The Michael Knowles Show - November 27, 2022


Lies, Theft, & Orgies In The Bahamas: FTX Crypto Explained | Erik Voorhees


Episode Stats

Length

20 minutes

Words per Minute

171.89241

Word Count

3,600

Sentence Count

249

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

1


Summary

FTX, the world's second largest crypto exchange, was changing everything. It was revolutionizing not just crypto and finance, but the whole world through effective altruism, through the funding of the most wonderful, idealistic, largely Democratic politicians all over the U.S. It was all just so beautiful until it all came tumbling down. And it turned out that FTX was actually a bunch of kids living in a Bahamas penthouse, doing a ton of drugs and sleeping with one another, spending gazillions of dollars that didn't actually exist.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 It all seemed so wonderful. FTX, the world's second largest crypto exchange, was changing
00:00:08.040 everything. It was revolutionizing not just crypto and finance, but the whole world through
00:00:14.660 effective altruism, through the funding of the most wonderful, idealistic, largely Democrat
00:00:22.880 politicians all over the United States. It was all just so beautiful until it all came
00:00:29.720 tumbling down. And it turned out that FTX was actually just a bunch of kids living in a Bahamas
00:00:38.800 penthouse, doing a ton of drugs and sleeping with one another and spending gazillions of dollars that
00:00:46.300 didn't actually really exist. Now, I know absolutely nothing about crypto or finance or the Bahamas for
00:00:56.000 that matter. But fortunately, we have one of the OG leaders in crypto, Eric Voorhees, who has debated
00:01:03.880 the man in question here. That would be Sam Bankman-Fried, S-B-F, and who has really approached
00:01:12.620 crypto, not just from a money-making perspective, but from a philosophical perspective as well.
00:01:17.000 And can, I think, shed some light on what the hell happened. Eric, thank you so much for coming on the
00:01:23.400 show. Hey, Michael. Thanks for having me. I truly know nothing about crypto. I have been reading the
00:01:31.920 reports of what happened here at FTX. I still, I don't quite get it. The best I can deduce is that
00:01:39.180 the whole thing was kind of a Ponzi scheme. What happened?
00:01:45.280 Yeah, let's start with the basics. So yeah, FTX was this massive exchange, fairly new on the scene,
00:01:52.580 like it didn't even really exist three or four years ago. But suddenly it was the second largest
00:01:57.400 exchange. It had its name on the Miami Heat Stadium. It was doing Super Bowl ads with Tom Brady and Giselle.
00:02:04.940 And everyone thought it was like one of the most successful companies in the entire industry.
00:02:12.460 It had a related company called Alameda, started by the same guy prior to FTX. Alameda was a
00:02:20.760 prop trading firm. They would trade their own money, make speculative bets on various things within the
00:02:26.080 crypto world and without. And FTX was a exchange for customers. So people that want to buy and sell
00:02:34.260 cryptocurrencies would go to FTX to do that. What seems to have happened is that Alameda made a bunch
00:02:41.600 of losing bets, very large losing bets, billions of dollars, perhaps earlier this year. And it borrowed
00:02:50.780 the missing amount from FTX. FTX lent customer money over to Alameda. So FTX had billions of dollars
00:03:02.620 of customer deposits who were trying to trade their own cryptocurrencies. It lent that money,
00:03:07.040 unbeknownst to those customers, to this other company. And that seems to be what has happened
00:03:12.680 generally. The details are still all coming out. But there's something around $10 billion missing,
00:03:19.400 which is an absurd amount. And the behavior of SPF since the collapse last week has been also very
00:03:29.900 strange and extraordinary. So I'll stop there and we can dig into whatever you want.
00:03:34.320 Fools and their money are quickly separated. But you're talking about some pretty serious people
00:03:39.520 with some pretty serious money and then a ton of other kind of regular run-of-the-mill retail investors
00:03:45.740 who are using this exchange. How did nobody figure out that the whole thing was kind of a scam?
00:03:53.660 Well, Twitter figured it out. Crypto Twitter figured it out. Just people using blockchain forensics
00:04:01.080 figured it out. And that's kind of what started this all unwinding. It certainly wasn't the government
00:04:05.940 that figured it out. It certainly wasn't regulators that figured it out. It certainly wasn't the police
00:04:10.200 anywhere that figured it out. It was just private people doing some investigation. And so it was discovered
00:04:19.180 because basically they had to stop having customer withdrawals. They had to pause them.
00:04:27.080 And that's always like a huge red flag. There should be no point where a custodian is ever pausing
00:04:32.220 withdrawals. That's a problem. And they're pausing it because they didn't have enough money to fund it.
00:04:38.020 Right. I mean, this is the sort of thing we read about in the 1930s or right after the stock market
00:04:43.260 crash that this Twitter thread emerges. And they say, actually, FTX is completely screwed. And then
00:04:55.080 people come in and they say, OK, I want to get my money out of here. And it's basically like a run
00:04:58.420 on the bank. And the bank or the exchange, the FTX in this case, doesn't have the funds. And so they
00:05:03.460 say, OK, we're going to put a pause on it. And then no one has any faith whatsoever in the institution
00:05:07.520 anymore. And then the whole thing just collapses instantly. Yeah, the comparison to a bank is the
00:05:13.120 right one. So just like with banks, FTX operated on what's called a custodial model where it's
00:05:18.620 holding customer money. So a lot of things in crypto are called self-custody, where you're
00:05:23.640 holding your own keys, you're holding your own crypto, and you don't have to worry about whether
00:05:27.480 people are trustworthy. But still, people deposit funds with third parties. And in this case, the third
00:05:33.320 party was FTX. And just like a bank that doesn't actually have all the money in it that people think
00:05:37.960 it does, FTX did not either. But unlike a bank, FTX does not have a backstop of taxpayers in the form
00:05:45.020 of FDIC insurance. So when the run started, it all fell apart. You have to feel sorry for the people
00:05:52.780 who lost their money, even Tom Brady or whoever. But there is something really satisfying here,
00:05:59.360 which is that SBF, the guy who was running this thing, was so flamboyantly liberal. I don't know.
00:06:09.800 He was so effusive about effective altruism and how he was going to transform the world. And he
00:06:16.300 wasn't really in it for the money. He was just in it for all the good that he could do for everybody
00:06:20.440 else. And then it turned out it was just complete BS. The guy's a common criminal, basically.
00:06:25.700 Yeah, well, he was the second largest donor to the Democratic Party in this last cycle,
00:06:31.320 something like $40 million. I'm awaiting those politicians to return all that money so that
00:06:35.940 it can go into the relief fund for the victims. That would be nice.
00:06:39.420 Well, I hope you're not holding your breath on that, Eric, because I don't think that would be
00:06:44.440 conducive to your health. So the basic scheme here was the guy takes the money out of the exchange
00:06:54.680 and sends it over to this hedge fund. The hedge fund is being run, it turns out, by this 20-something
00:07:01.900 Stanford graduate girl who may or may not have been SBF's girlfriend and who publicly now it is
00:07:10.740 coming out. I mean, I guess it was public before, but no one was paying attention to it,
00:07:14.720 was not implementing even basic protections against some of her crazy bets that obviously
00:07:21.980 weren't paying off very well as investments. And then they would all brag about how they were
00:07:26.720 hopped up on amphetamines. I guess what I still struggle with is how did they get away with it for
00:07:33.600 this long? They got away with it for this long because they had the mirage of protection under
00:07:42.320 government regulation happening. FTX's marketing campaign was the safe, regulated way to buy Bitcoin
00:07:49.040 and digital assets. And it wasn't just a campaign. Again, Sam was in Washington, D.C. lobbying and
00:07:56.740 talking with all these regulators. He was buddies with many of them. There are all sorts of photos of
00:08:00.700 him with Maxine Waters. And he had meetings with the chairman of the SEC, Gary Gensler, who seems to
00:08:07.180 have taken a very light touch approach with him. People trusted it because it flew under the banner of
00:08:15.740 regulation. And unfortunately, people trust the government. They should stop doing that.
00:08:20.120 Thankfully, in crypto, you can trust code. You can trust math. You don't need to trust politicians.
00:08:25.340 But people still do. And so that's part of what allowed this to get so large and to collapse so
00:08:31.020 horribly. You know, I'm not a huge Ayn Rand guy, but I have to admit this whole episode just seems like
00:08:37.680 something out of Atlas Shrugged. You know, the really crooked businessman whose entire wealth rests on
00:08:44.280 favors that he's calling in in Washington, D.C. I mean, this guy, Sam Bankman-Fried, was just doing
00:08:49.600 all of that. And it's not just the regulators in D.C. It was the media, too. I just pulled at sort of
00:08:56.660 at random one of the glowing profiles of this man. Here's what they said about his Bahamian business
00:09:03.620 operation. Sam Bankman-Fried lives there with nine roommates, fellow travelers in effective
00:09:10.280 altruisms movement. An intimate crew. We learned it was actually a very intimate crew, but that's
00:09:15.700 beside the point. It's just SBF, his family, his mother, father, and brother are all in town,
00:09:21.660 and close friends. A team dedicated to fixing the world via the magic of quantitative easing and the
00:09:27.700 overwhelming force of goodwill. All of them are united by the mission. Goes on and on and on.
00:09:33.460 Yes, the government regulators failed here. Didn't the media fail as well? How come it's just
00:09:38.280 random guys on Twitter who were able to expose this fraud? Where were the journalists? Where
00:09:42.960 are the financial journalists who should have been poking around the business operation?
00:09:48.660 Yeah, well, they, like often, abdicate their responsibility. In the crypto world,
00:09:53.620 we get lots of articles from the press that are very damaging and very cynical about what we're doing.
00:10:01.740 But when it comes to someone like SPF, they write these glowing reviews.
00:10:04.900 Why? Why that discrepancy? Like the good leaders that have been in this space for
00:10:10.900 up to a decade at this point, just get totally trashed by the New York Times, by the Wall Street
00:10:16.160 Journal, myself included. And then the biggest fraudster that has ever appeared in crypto comes
00:10:23.100 along, and they write these glowing reviews about him. Even what came out in the New York Times a day or
00:10:28.060 two ago, post the collapse. If you read it, it's shocking how unwilling they are to acknowledge
00:10:35.100 that Sam committed an absurd degree of fraud and theft here. They don't even use those words. They
00:10:41.520 talk about how there was a collapse and this thing went off the rails. And it just got this vibe of,
00:10:48.800 you know, poor kid got ahead of himself instead of, this guy stole customer deposits and gave them to
00:10:56.300 a sister company. And that is simply just fraud and theft. It's not complicated. It's not like some
00:11:03.260 complicated new scheme was created using crypto technology. They just had a bunch of customer
00:11:08.280 money and they gave it to someone else. And it's just theft.
00:11:11.320 You know, I did watch a debate between you and this guy, Sam Bankman-Fried, and knowing absolutely
00:11:19.100 nothing about crypto, I had the sense that you had the right side of the debate because you gave your
00:11:26.260 answers in really plain, concise language. And he would just spin a yarn forever using all this kind
00:11:34.520 of jargon and all of these kind of mealy-mouthed words. And I thought, you know, seems like the guy is
00:11:40.780 trying to hide something here. And clearly that's the case. But as you point out with the New York
00:11:45.380 Times, the narrative that is emerging from the collapse of FTX is that this was a failure of
00:11:52.540 too little regulation. The failure here was that, you know, crypto itself is sort of poisoned or,
00:12:01.520 you know, we just need the government to come in there more and add some more safeguards. You say
00:12:06.760 it's exactly the opposite. Yeah. The problem here is that someone committed theft and stole a bunch
00:12:12.380 of money. Theft doesn't require regulation. It's already illegal. Crypto doesn't need more rules. It
00:12:18.340 already has a bunch. Centralized custodians like this are already heavily regulated under the Bank
00:12:22.640 Secrecy Act and many other laws in the United States and elsewhere. Those of us in crypto have
00:12:28.480 seen how much regulation we have, and it doesn't help people. And here comes the biggest fraudster ever,
00:12:33.840 and none of the regulators stopped it. None of the regulators caught it. The industry caught it.
00:12:38.900 The industry stopped it. And for those of us who have been building this stuff, what we're trying
00:12:43.780 to advocate here is that people realize that decentralized finance, basically using financial
00:12:49.360 tools built on blockchains where you don't have to trust anyone, is the future. You can have honesty
00:12:54.060 through transparency and through code. You don't need to trust, you know, Tom Brady's endorsement.
00:13:00.160 You don't need to trust Maxine Waters and her, you know, 50th Committee on Financial Oversight.
00:13:05.800 You can just trust open source code, and that is incredibly powerful. And that's actually the
00:13:09.240 right lesson to learn from all this. By the way, I remember what Tom Brady did to those footballs,
00:13:13.260 okay? I remember Deflategate. So I would never trust a crypto exchange that he was endorsing.
00:13:18.540 But I don't know, maybe that's from my prejudices as a New Yorker, you know, never was a big Patriots
00:13:23.160 fan. Moving forward, you've got this DeFi movement. We're saying, okay, the regulation
00:13:29.040 is a big, big problem here. And obviously there was a failure of people being too cozy with these
00:13:33.760 regulators. Can crypto broadly survive this? I mean, because you can say, well, the narrative
00:13:40.940 that's being spun up by the media is total BS, but narratives have power. What does the collapse
00:13:48.060 of FTX mean for the broader crypto space? Yeah. So from a superficial level, it's a huge
00:13:54.760 black eye for crypto, right? Like irrefutably. The fundamental question, what's valuable to
00:14:01.520 understand is, did anything actually change with the technology that would lead someone who had a
00:14:07.040 thesis about this to change their thesis? Nothing about crypto technology changed. There's no horrible
00:14:13.440 bug revealed in the consensus mechanism of Bitcoin, for example. Crypto blockchains keep working just
00:14:20.460 as they always have, and they operate according to code. The failure here is a failure of centralized
00:14:25.160 financial intermediaries, and that's been happening for hundreds of years. There's nothing new to that.
00:14:31.640 But certainly people who don't look under the surface or who read the New York Times
00:14:35.400 are going to end up, you know, misled. And that's a shame.
00:14:40.020 I think you repeated yourself there, by the way, Eric. People who don't look under the surface and
00:14:44.200 people who read the New York Times. I hope they can look elsewhere to figure out the reality of
00:14:50.600 what is going on. But if you've got all this money that basically disappears, and who knows if SBF,
00:14:58.200 you know, flies off into the sunset, you know, and leaves on a yacht from the Bahamas, you know,
00:15:03.880 with some crypto wallets in his pocket. But how are the other exchanges reacting to this? And what do
00:15:11.660 you think, even if it's ill-advised, the regulatory action from Washington is going to be?
00:15:18.080 Yeah, so the other exchanges are, you know, all reacting first in telling people, you know,
00:15:26.080 they don't act the same way. You can trust them. And some of them are correct. You can trust them.
00:15:30.740 But that's also still missing the point. Again, the best way to use crypto is in a way that you
00:15:35.760 don't have to trust humans. That's the magic of the technology that has come out. So decentralized
00:15:39.860 exchanges haven't been saying anything, of course, because there's no people there. It's just these
00:15:45.420 financial robots that work according to code. And that's like a much better way to actually have
00:15:48.840 a foundation for economic interaction between people. One good thing that should happen from this
00:15:55.500 is more of the centralized exchanges may be encouraged to do what's called proof of reserves.
00:16:02.180 So you can actually do like a mathematical proof of what you hold. It's slightly technical,
00:16:08.120 but it can be done in a way for the user where it's clear and obvious. And that would provide
00:16:12.680 some degree of verifiability. So I'm hoping that that will happen. I think the regulators are going
00:16:19.340 to use this as an opportunity to regulate more. They're not going to use it as an opportunity to
00:16:23.680 self-reflect and recognize that they completely and utterly failed at their job. I can guarantee
00:16:28.400 you that. They're just going to use this to write more laws and impose them down on a bunch
00:16:31.860 of innocent people. So we've talked about what the effect for crypto will be. Will there be any effect?
00:16:38.860 Will there be any black eye for the effective altruism movement? Will there be any black eye for the
00:16:45.780 Democrat Party? Will there be any black eye for the regulators or no? Do you think that just gets
00:16:51.400 brushed under the rug because this is kind of a technical topic to discuss and most people are
00:16:57.160 just going to glaze over? Well, it's actually not a technical topic. It's just someone who had a
00:17:02.820 bunch of customer money stealing it and giving it to someone else, right? But I mean, the industry
00:17:06.520 broadly requires a little bit of kind of technical know-how. Yeah, that's fair. I don't really think
00:17:12.960 this is actually a story about effective altruism. I mean, that's the idea that if you're going to try to
00:17:17.380 be generous, you should try to be effective in your generosity. And there's nothing wrong with
00:17:21.440 that in principle. The reason that gets pulled into the story is because it looks so bad when,
00:17:26.200 you know, one of the world's foremost billionaire effective altruism advocates comes out as like
00:17:31.140 the greatest Ponzi scheme operator of all time. This isn't actually even a Ponzi scheme. It's just
00:17:36.960 theft. So like we don't need to come. Do you think there's a comparison? You know, people are asking,
00:17:42.880 is this Bernie Madoff? Is this Enron? Is this, I don't know, any other number of huge financial
00:17:48.640 scandals? Is there any analogy that you would draw? I think it's closer to Enron than Bernie.
00:17:56.200 Bernie was running a Ponzi scheme over many years over the long term that failed as Ponzi schemes must
00:18:02.520 fail. This wasn't really a Ponzi scheme. This was just taking a bunch of customer money and giving it
00:18:07.580 to someone else. I'm sure that Sam thought that he'd get that debt paid back and it would never
00:18:13.280 be a problem. But it was a problem. So yeah, there's, I don't know a good historical example
00:18:22.960 like this. Certainly within crypto, a lot of centralized exchanges have gone bust or had
00:18:28.260 hacks, you know, that kind of thing. So it's not new within centralized custodians.
00:18:33.460 You've talked about your enemies in Washington. Do you have any allies? I mean, are there politicians
00:18:39.080 that you would point to who you think these guys get it, they get what crypto is and what crypto
00:18:44.100 could be and they're moving in the right direction on it? Yeah, there are a few and there's more and
00:18:51.180 more. You know, 10 years ago, no one in Washington cared about Bitcoin or crypto. Five years ago,
00:18:56.740 no one in Washington was an ally. Now there are some allies. I don't actually want to name any
00:19:03.440 names because I'm kind of a persona non grata in Washington and I don't want to get them in trouble
00:19:09.400 with their peers. But it has been good to see actual allies that understand it and who speak
00:19:14.700 eloquently when they're discussing cryptocurrency. Can I at least ask you, are you talking about
00:19:19.260 regulator or bureaucrat types? Are you talking about US senators, say, or are you talking about
00:19:24.740 all of the above? Senators, senators and congressmen. I don't know that I've seen any
00:19:28.660 regulators who are doing a good job. I will make one exception, which is Hester Pierce at the SEC.
00:19:36.560 She's been the most thoughtful, perhaps the only thoughtful regulator at the SEC.
00:19:41.620 She has stood against many of the decisions that they've made that have been really bad.
00:19:45.860 So yeah, props to her for both understanding what she's talking about and for coming to the right
00:19:50.060 conclusions on it. Well, that's terrific. I'm glad to hear that you've got a little bit of support in
00:19:54.420 Washington, even if you wisely don't want to go about flaunting it. You saw what happened to the
00:19:59.420 last guy who was flaunting all of his political contacts in Washington. Did not turn out very
00:20:03.320 well for him or for his exchange. But thank you for shedding a little light on something that I
00:20:07.860 really, you know, I just mired in all of the gobbledygook jargon. I couldn't make any sense of
00:20:13.580 it, but you've distilled it pretty well. A guy stole a bunch of money and spent it in ways that he
00:20:18.780 shouldn't have. A tale as old as time, but in this case on a very large scale. Eric, where can people
00:20:24.760 find you if they want to read more, follow your thoughts, and all the rest of it?
00:20:30.400 Twitter's great, at Eric Voorhees, Eric with a K, and you can find me there.
00:20:36.400 That's great. That's wonderful. I look forward to that. Speaking of freedom and, you know,
00:20:42.200 getting rid of regulations, Twitter, another great place right now where a billionaire is coming in
00:20:47.980 and hopefully making things a little bit more free. So I'll look forward to seeing you over there.
00:20:51.820 And for all the rest of you out there, I look forward to seeing you tomorrow. I'm Michael Knowles.
00:20:55.560 This is The Michael Knowles Show.