Michael Knowles DEBATES Viral Pro-Choice Activist | Bronte Remsik
Episode Stats
Length
2 hours and 21 minutes
Words per Minute
193.57512
Summary
In this episode, Dr. Bronte Remzik, a third-year medical student at the University of Tennessee Knoxville, joins Betsy and Amanda to debate abortion and the pro-life movement in general. The conversation touches on abortion access, the role of the fetus in the womb, and the importance of informed consent.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
If you want to look at that, then you would like to look at that.
00:00:06.920
It's just really ghastly to show a picture of a person who's been killed.
00:00:10.180
People such as yourself like to share propaganda about this issue.
00:00:14.600
And I am here to try to present a medically accurate representation of this issue.
00:00:30.000
One of the great sorrows of my life is that liberals never want to talk to me.
00:00:42.860
One of the most successful popular videos that we've put out was a debate that I had
00:00:47.720
with a popular social media influencer on the left on the topic of abortion
00:00:54.220
And not only that, she did so well that we decided we had to invite her out here
00:01:02.160
Bronte, thank you for coming out all the way to Tennessee.
00:01:08.660
I hope that I can kind of introduce your viewers to a new perspective.
00:01:12.520
That's, you know, I suspect they have been introduced,
00:01:15.820
but perhaps you will change some people's minds.
00:01:17.920
For the occasion, I'm having a very pink drink of some sort.
00:01:28.500
People can find you on TikTok and throughout social media.
00:01:31.720
And you have a website as well where you've got all of your ideas and merchandise.
00:01:47.400
You have done us the great honor of coming out here
00:01:50.840
and gone through all the hassle that it takes to get to Tennessee.
00:01:53.060
See, so you are staunchly in favor of abortion.
00:01:59.000
If you had to give me the elevator pitch, what would it be?
00:02:03.460
So what I would really like to start this conversation off with
00:02:06.400
and make very clear from the start for both you and your viewers
00:02:09.360
is I am not saying that you are wrong for being uncomfortable with abortion.
00:02:14.680
I'm not saying that you are wrong for not agreeing with it.
00:02:18.380
But your opinion applies to your body and your life alone.
00:02:23.060
We are not sitting here having a discussion about our personal disagreements.
00:02:28.520
I am here to educate you and your viewers on the guidelines of proper medical practice
00:02:33.840
that have been established by our country's leading medical experts.
00:02:37.440
And they have stated publicly and unequivocally that abortion access is essential
00:02:48.360
And what remains true is protecting innocent life never involves restricting access to health care.
00:02:58.120
You mentioned that all of the genius medical people agree in our country that we need to have abortion.
00:03:03.620
Now, surely all of the genius medical people have agreed on all sorts of practices throughout history,
00:03:09.160
even in the not-so-distant past, that are quite terrible for people.
00:03:16.360
There was a scientific consensus in the country that when women are behaving a little eccentric,
00:03:23.340
And they used these kinds of procedures throughout the 20th century.
00:03:27.320
Now we look at that as ghastly and a violation of basic rights.
00:03:33.840
So surely you're not telling me that just because a bunch of fancy people in lab coats
00:03:37.700
think something about a matter of bioethics, that therefore it's the gospel truth.
00:03:42.040
Well, a big part of the prior travesties of medicine is there was not consent from patients.
00:03:49.000
And there wasn't proper informed consent from patients.
00:03:52.760
Where when it comes to abortion, you continuously say that I am pro-abortion,
00:03:59.980
And abortion access and the discussion of having an abortion should be between the patient
00:04:08.620
And the entire concept and the entire point is that the pregnant person gets to consent
00:04:14.780
to continue with their pregnancy and must consent to the use of their body.
00:04:19.340
Because they are the one that understands their body and their life and their finances
00:04:23.520
and everything that makes up the complexities of human life.
00:04:26.960
They are the only ones who are able to decide and understand what is best for them
00:04:31.240
with the guidance of proper modern medical practices.
00:04:36.240
And it is true that our world and our country's leading medical minds have, like I said, unequivocally
00:04:42.860
stated that abortion access is essential to comprehensive, evidence-based health care.
00:04:49.280
And your opinion can remain your opinion, but it does not get to override the opinion
00:04:55.080
of people who train their entire lives to provide health care to people.
00:04:59.000
Well, so on the matter of consent, obviously the clear rebuttal to that would be that abortion
00:05:03.780
involves not two people, but three people, one of whom is the unborn baby.
00:05:07.040
Now, I imagine you would have issues with that description, so we can get to that in a moment.
00:05:11.180
The first thing you said, though, is that I'm entitled to my opinion, but I'm only entitled
00:05:16.060
to my opinion as it pertains to my own body, and I'm not entitled to an opinion about what
00:05:24.420
Do you really believe that people can only have opinions about things that pertain to
00:05:30.480
I can't have an opinion about, I don't know, a sunset, or I don't know how automobiles are
00:05:37.420
made, or I don't know, drug use or anything like that.
00:05:40.840
I can't have an opinion about politics, how our government should be run, or how our political
00:05:50.760
You can have your opinion about anything and anyone that you'd like, but that opinion cannot
00:05:57.800
You can disagree with someone's choice to get an abortion, but just because you disagree
00:06:03.060
with it doesn't mean that your opinion should override the opinion of their medical experts.
00:06:07.960
Can my opinion be put into effect to restrict someone's access to drugs like heroin?
00:06:19.660
Well, we have self-government in the United States, at least nominally.
00:06:23.220
And so if I think that heroin is really bad, and I think we ought to have laws against its
00:06:27.800
use, then I can lobby my elected representatives and they can pass a law, as they have, against
00:06:32.640
And then you are not allowed to use heroin, even though that affects only your own body.
00:06:37.940
I have now expressed my opinion about heroin in such a way that it restricts what you can
00:06:46.620
So actually, with laws regarding drugs, it is illegal to buy and sell drugs, but it's not
00:06:58.000
But you cannot tell me what I can or cannot do with my body.
00:07:01.500
Again, you can totally and rightfully so disagree with someone's choice to do drugs, but that
00:07:08.600
doesn't mean that we shouldn't, as health care providers, ensure that that, say, drug user
00:07:15.420
is able to make informed choices about their body.
00:07:18.380
Are you familiar with, like, clean needle programs?
00:07:23.040
And so clean needle programs, they reduce disease transmission.
00:07:27.360
And so even though someone is going to choose to do drugs, it is the responsibility of medical
00:07:32.280
experts and health care providers to ensure that we cannot, you know, we cannot change someone's
00:07:38.840
choices and behavioral patterns, but we can ensure that we provide them resources and able
00:07:44.020
to ensure that their decisions and the impact of their decisions is minimized in whatever way
00:07:50.000
Bronte, putting aside for a moment the efficacy of clean needle programs, which I think is
00:07:54.600
dubious, but that might be a discussion for another day, I think you're evading the question
00:07:58.680
Because you're suggesting that drug use is not criminal in all cases, which is not the
00:08:06.360
There are all places where drug use is quite...
00:08:14.400
Nevertheless, purchasing the drugs would be illegal.
00:08:17.180
Now, this is something you do with your own body, with your own money.
00:08:20.780
It's the very same issue, just removed one step.
00:08:24.540
So is it all right for me to express my opinion about illicit drug use, to restrict you from
00:08:32.680
Be that shooting the heroin, purchasing the heroin, putting the heroin in a syringe, whatever
00:08:37.980
And clearly, I am restricting your bodily autonomy here.
00:08:42.880
And that has been done throughout civilization.
00:08:45.720
That remains on the books in the United States.
00:08:47.640
So are you saying that drug laws are basically some sort of travesty?
00:08:55.340
Now, when we talk about pregnancy and abortion, essentially, what causes pregnancy is sex, correct?
00:09:01.200
And we cannot outlaw sex, unless that's something that you are trying to bring forth.
00:09:06.660
And so when it comes to laws limiting someone's ability to have bodily autonomy or limit someone's
00:09:13.740
ability to behave in a certain way, sex and pregnancy and abortion is a very unique circumstance.
00:09:20.840
And sure, we can talk all day about some convoluted drug analogy.
00:09:35.980
And so trying to compare it to illegalizing drug use, it's not completely analogous to illegalizing
00:09:44.340
Because sex and drug use are two very different things.
00:09:47.280
And they happen for two very different reasons.
00:09:49.240
I suppose I'm just discussing the principle that you described earlier, which is that I don't
00:09:54.440
have the right to an opinion that affects what you do with your own body.
00:09:58.400
But even leaving that aside, you say that we can't make sex illegal.
00:10:02.580
I don't think anybody wants to make sex illegal.
00:10:04.560
But historically, all sorts of sex has been illegal.
00:10:10.120
There are certain sexual behaviors, even in our more decadent and inclusive age, that are
00:10:15.520
Obviously, sex with children or sex with animals, things like that.
00:10:18.460
Historically, sex outside of marriage has been illegal in many places.
00:10:23.820
Homosexual sexual activities have been illegal in many places.
00:10:26.520
So we've had laws in the United States and continue to have laws that regulate sex.
00:10:37.040
And doesn't that seem to be a little bit beside the point when it comes to abortion?
00:10:41.160
Because now we're saying, you know, consenting adults above the age of 18, they can have
00:10:47.320
But if you do have sex and you do get pregnant, well, you don't have the right to kill the
00:10:52.640
Well, when you talk about things like, you know, having sex with children or animals being
00:10:57.680
illegal, that's because they can't properly consent to have sex.
00:11:01.460
When we're talking about consent or sex with, you know, consensual sex between adults, that
00:11:09.060
People have sex for social reasons, social connections, psychological reasons, not just
00:11:16.240
And so, sure, pregnancy can happen accidentally and unwanted, but consent must be enthusiastic
00:11:27.400
You know, sort of, well, I'll do it, but, you know, I'm not happy about it.
00:11:30.380
That's a really big problem in our society right now.
00:11:32.580
And, you know, that's something that people will take, you know, the small...
00:11:38.740
And that's why we say sex should be enthusiastic and ongoing.
00:11:42.800
Because if you are trying to have sex with someone who's not enthusiastic about it, then
00:11:49.680
I agree with you entirely, but isn't that a bit sex-negative of you to say that?
00:11:53.520
That there is a certain way that one should engage in consensual sex?
00:11:59.420
No, because enthusiasm is expressed, you know, differently between people.
00:12:03.580
It doesn't mean that you have to be jumping up and down.
00:12:05.680
I just mean that the person who's consenting is consenting, you know, very clearly and enthusiastically
00:12:10.960
in their own way and not being pressured into saying yes, not being timid about saying yes.
00:12:16.600
You know, you are ensuring that they are saying yes, you know, out of their own validity.
00:12:21.720
I want to compare, like, sex with pregnancy, right?
00:12:25.060
So you understand that sex can be a fun and beautiful thing without, you know, people
00:12:31.720
But it's only fun and beautiful when it's consensual.
00:12:35.100
And when sex is not consensual, it can be traumatic and devastating for people.
00:12:41.420
When pregnancy is consensual and pregnancy is wanted, it can be a beautiful thing.
00:12:47.680
But when pregnancy is unwanted and non-consensual, then it can be a very traumatic and devastating
00:12:54.420
Well, you know, I suspect it can be both in either case.
00:12:59.380
I mean, I think not only of the experience of my wife, but of many of my friends who have
00:13:05.780
And they want kids and they intentionally get pregnant, or at least they are happy when
00:13:10.500
they find out that they accidentally become pregnant.
00:13:12.320
But there's still a lot of trauma involved in that.
00:13:14.600
I mean, there's a lot of suffering that comes along with that.
00:13:17.220
That's part of pregnancy and childbirth and life generally.
00:13:20.960
You know, life involves some degree of suffering.
00:13:22.960
So it just seems what you're saying is, when the pregnancy is desired, that is beautiful
00:13:33.240
And when the pregnancy is not desired, then you ought to be able to end it, meaning end
00:13:39.620
And it reminds me of what the, you see this with the royal family.
00:13:43.400
The royal family, you know, the princess gets pregnant and they say, we have the royal baby.
00:13:49.800
But they say, this is a royal baby, but then some left-wing woman goes on television and
00:13:58.240
But we're talking about the exact same thing, right?
00:13:59.740
We're talking about a child at, who knows, 15 weeks gestation, 20 weeks gestation, let's
00:14:04.780
So, yes, I understand that the experience of sex in pregnancy can be felt differently in
00:14:13.080
But the baby himself would be the same in both circumstances.
00:14:17.480
It's just in one, we celebrate his beautiful baby life, and in the other, we kill him as
00:14:22.800
So, when it comes to medical terminology, it's actually an embryo or a fetus.
00:14:28.680
And when you call it a clump of cells, I agree that that can feel dehumanizing.
00:14:33.160
But on the same side, when you call it a baby, that's also anthropomorphizing.
00:14:38.640
And so, neither side is correct in its entirety, and that doesn't remove, what?
00:14:44.860
Well, I guess you're entirely right that the, I mean, you mentioned the word fetus, which
00:14:51.660
ironically is dehumanizing, although the word fetus, you know, the Latin word fetus just
00:14:57.580
means offspring, and we're referring to human beings here.
00:15:00.060
But doesn't the question hinge on which language should we use?
00:15:04.640
So, one is dehumanizing, one is anthropomorphizing, in other words, humanizing.
00:15:09.460
So, then, isn't the question that we have to answer, is this thing that we're talking
00:15:15.160
And if it is a human, then we should only use the anthropomorphizing language, and if
00:15:19.240
it is not a human, then we should only call him a clump of cells.
00:15:21.940
Well, when it comes to medicine and medical practice, it is, you are, you call it a fetus,
00:15:28.960
Well, but you're also not a medical professional, are you, Mike?
00:15:30.740
But I'm a human being with rational faculties who describes the world around him, right?
00:15:34.280
True, but you aren't having discussions with pregnant people, and when...
00:15:40.840
So, there are articles written for medical professionals about how to have these conversations,
00:15:48.140
And when the pregnancy is wanted, it is also appropriate to call it a baby when that pregnancy
00:15:54.600
is wanted and desired, and you are trying to create a comforting and accepting environment
00:16:01.080
But from a medical standpoint, it is completely appropriate to call it a fetus until you understand
00:16:07.060
where your patient is at in their mentality regarding their pregnancy.
00:16:13.460
If the mother wants to be pregnant, then you can call it a baby.
00:16:19.140
But if the mother doesn't want to be pregnant, you don't call it a baby?
00:16:23.720
That's amazing that that's the medical guidance.
00:16:25.720
Yeah, well, it's all about creating a comfortable and appropriate environment for the patient
00:16:30.720
because we care about the mentality of the patient, and you want the patient to be able
00:16:36.800
You want the patient to feel comfortable in your exam room.
00:16:39.940
And calling it a fetus when it is a wanted pregnancy can make them feel detached from that
00:16:45.780
But also calling it a baby when it is an unwanted pregnancy can put, you know, unnecessary pressure
00:16:53.920
But you don't believe that whether or not the baby is human hinges on whether or not
00:17:03.500
You don't think that the desire is the determining factor for the ontology of the embryo?
00:17:13.920
So then why wouldn't you use anthropomorphizing language?
00:17:16.240
Why wouldn't you refer to it in human language?
00:17:17.840
Because language is often emotional, and pregnancy is an emotional state for someone to be in.
00:17:23.460
And as a medical professional, you have to be conscious of the way that your words affect
00:17:31.860
Well, you said it is lying, because you said the baby or fetus or whatever you want to say
00:17:36.760
And you said the word baby is humanizing language.
00:17:39.480
So you're describing the human being with humanizing language, unless you say that the emotions
00:17:46.640
of the pregnant mother are such that you don't want to describe the human being in humanizing
00:17:53.180
And so you describe the human being in dehumanizing language.
00:17:59.920
How would you describe that other than telling a lie?
00:18:02.720
I didn't say that anthropomorphizing was necessarily a negative thing.
00:18:06.640
And as I said, saying fetus is medical terminology, and it is appropriate.
00:18:19.260
It's medically appropriate, and it's medically consistent with how you should define...
00:18:25.920
Why are you given the guidance to call it a fetus to the woman who doesn't want the baby
00:18:32.200
and a baby to the woman who does want the baby?
00:18:35.080
I've explained this to you, but I can explain it again.
00:18:39.860
It depends on the mentality of the pregnant person and how they feel towards that pregnancy.
00:18:45.060
Because as a medical professional, in that exam room, you are trying to create a comfortable
00:18:49.720
environment where that patient understands what their options are and what their situation is.
00:18:55.840
And so when you are trying to identify how they feel about their current medical state,
00:19:01.200
you want to use language that creates a comfortable environment for them.
00:19:05.140
So how do those two words affect their emotional statement?
00:19:12.420
When a pregnant mother who doesn't want the baby hears you describe the baby as a fetus
00:19:17.900
versus as a baby, how are they perceiving and conceiving of that?
00:19:23.000
So I can probably ask you the same question, Michael.
00:19:25.020
Why on your show and in these interviews do you insist on calling it a baby?
00:19:30.380
Is it because you understand the emotional pull that that has on your viewers?
00:19:34.560
So you insist on using that language because you understand it's emotional.
00:19:38.180
No, it's because I think it's ontologically precise in exactly the way you just described.
00:19:43.500
Because you say that the word baby is anthropomorphizing,
00:19:46.280
and you said that the human being inside you is a human being.
00:19:49.380
And so it's appropriate to use humanizing language for human beings.
00:19:54.300
Depending on the conversation that you are having,
00:19:56.880
because you have to be aware and compassionate towards the person that you are having that discussion.
00:20:01.660
Right, but I don't think it's compassionate to deceive people or to pretend that the human isn't a human.
00:20:05.720
I think that it's always disrespectful to lie to people.
00:20:12.620
But it's less anthropomorphizing than baby, you would admit.
00:20:16.780
But would you admit that it's less humanizing than the word baby?
00:20:25.280
So if the two words are synonymous, why is there guidance for one and then the other?
00:20:29.820
You keep saying it's because of the emotional state of the mother.
00:20:34.340
How do the emotions change hearing one word or the other?
00:20:38.160
Again, I think you understand this because you choose to say baby.
00:20:41.140
Why do you choose to say baby instead of fetus?
00:20:47.440
Because there's an emotional baggage that comes with baby.
00:20:52.380
And so I generally try not to use sort of Latin or jargony terms for things that are plainly
00:20:59.080
And so that's why I prefer good Saxon words and good plain words.
00:21:02.460
And I don't use a 25-cent word when I can use a nickel word.
00:21:04.800
And as you just said, the guidance to use one word or the other based on whether the mother
00:21:13.600
wants to have an abortion or wants to give birth to her child clearly, though you don't seem willing
00:21:21.060
But clearly it's because the word fetus allows this pregnant mother in distress to abstract
00:21:26.800
away the humanity of her child and makes it easier for that woman to justify having an abortion.
00:21:32.060
Whereas if she were to call it a baby, it would be much, much harder for her to justify killing
00:21:40.480
I can acknowledge that calling it a baby minimizes the options that the pregnant person feels
00:21:49.300
And if they are not in a financial, mental, or physical state to carry through with that
00:21:54.340
pregnancy appropriately, calling it a baby makes them feel as if they have less options
00:22:01.200
So you mentioned those three states that you might be in where you want to kill your child.
00:22:07.080
A financial state, psychological state, and what was the other one?
00:22:19.480
What is the financial and physical state that would require one or greatly impel one to end
00:22:28.300
their baby's life in the womb through abortion?
00:22:31.660
Do you know how much it costs to carry through with pregnancy?
00:22:44.280
You just went through it with your wife, right?
00:22:50.280
Though we're very lucky in this country that the very poor have health care through Medicaid.
00:22:55.740
And the elderly, well, I guess they don't get pregnant all that much, but they could
00:22:59.220
And people have health insurance through their employers.
00:23:06.240
And people can stay in their parents' health care until the age of 26.
00:23:09.560
And you can go to an emergency room whenever you want.
00:23:11.020
So there are all sorts of health care options in the United States, some of which could be
00:23:15.720
But there are lots of health care options in the United States.
00:23:18.680
And then when one delivers in the hospital, there is a very large sticker price.
00:23:25.560
But people don't really pay that price because insurance covers that.
00:23:29.820
And it's basically just a scam to enrich the insurance companies.
00:23:32.700
But that's, again, another problem with the U.S. health care system.
00:23:35.680
People aren't actually writing $50,000 checks to give birth to their children.
00:23:39.660
So yeah, I'm not saying it's cheap to eat well and be able to stay home on bed rest, perhaps,
00:23:47.580
Or to get prenatal vitamins or to raise a kid is very, very expensive.
00:23:52.940
But to just get to the point of delivering the baby and then perhaps giving the baby up
00:24:01.360
So it costs about $18,000 on average to carry through with the pregnancy and labor.
00:24:09.840
And if you have insurance, the out-of-pocket cost is around $2,000 to $3,000.
00:24:14.300
But what you might not understand either, which I work in the medical field in rural North
00:24:20.380
Carolina, so I'm very much familiar with people who they do not have insurance or cannot afford
00:24:26.620
insurance, whether through their employer or if they're contract workers.
00:24:31.540
And then the limit for someone to be qualified for Medicaid, there is a good amount of people
00:24:38.120
And I worked at a clinic that offered free care to people who were uninsured but don't
00:24:43.560
And our clinic was busy all the time because there is a massive amount of people who fall
00:24:49.840
There's a great organization called Good Counsel Homes, which I really love.
00:24:57.000
And they do fabulous work for people who, again, might fall through the cracks or might
00:25:01.560
be very distressed and for whom abortion might seem attractive because of that financial
00:25:07.700
But there are lots and lots of these organizations.
00:25:09.940
You mentioned the one that you work with, I mentioned the one that I've done some work
00:25:12.820
with, and there are many, many others around the country, which is good.
00:25:17.080
But it seems to undermine the argument that financial reasons impel people to get abortions.
00:25:22.680
No, because as we discussed in the beginning, there's multiple reasons that someone might
00:25:27.020
not be able to carry through with a pregnancy, physically, psychologically, and financially.
00:25:30.820
And financially, the financial aspect of it cannot be belittled.
00:25:40.600
I've got two kids under my belt hoping for more, you know.
00:25:43.220
So they've actually found that about 40% of Americans cannot afford an unexpected $400
00:25:49.100
cost, whether that be for their home, for their health, for whatever.
00:25:52.700
And so saying that it's not a big deal to inquire about, if you have insurance, about a $2,000
00:25:59.860
And if you don't have insurance, it can be about $18,000 on average.
00:26:02.660
When 40% of Americans can't afford an unexpected $400 cost, you are basically discounting the
00:26:12.240
Well, the thing about those statistics, though, is they're not quite right, because it's true
00:26:16.740
that many Americans don't have a lot of money, like cash, available.
00:26:21.340
But Americans tend to have a lot of stuff, because Americans carry a lot of debt.
00:26:24.980
So those numbers are also somewhat misleading, because what people do is go into debt.
00:26:29.500
Or if we're talking about something like an adoption, which is what we're really discussing
00:26:35.280
here, there are all sorts of wonderful adoption agencies and all sorts of wonderful programs
00:26:40.740
provided by the state and provided by private charity that cover these costs for all sorts
00:26:45.520
of people who are financially strapped but don't want to kill their children.
00:26:49.040
And so I just think it's an argument to evade the basic question.
00:26:55.880
I promise you, and I'll say it to the camera right now, if you are pregnant and you feel
00:27:00.920
that you can't afford to carry your child through pregnancy and you can't afford the $500 and
00:27:05.180
you can't find an organization that'll cover it, write to me.
00:27:10.700
Plenty of pro-life people around the country would do it.
00:27:14.960
Do you really believe $500 to $2,000 is that delta that people may or may not be able
00:27:23.540
to afford is a strong justification for killing 850,000 human beings every year?
00:27:29.060
So again, saying the term killing 800,000 human beings is essentially, no, that is using
00:27:35.020
manipulative and emotional language intentionally, Michael.
00:27:41.380
But killing a human being is not the same as aborting a fetus.
00:27:44.960
But you can use the manipulative and emotional language if you'd like.
00:27:48.040
Bronte, I'm only using your language because you said that it's alive and it's a human being.
00:27:52.640
And so what do you call it when you end a life?
00:28:00.100
And what do you call a human being is a human being.
00:28:06.360
If that's how you'd like to describe it, that's fine.
00:28:09.940
Well, since we've talked about the financial aspects of abortion and pregnancy, why don't we
00:28:14.420
talk about the physical and mental aspects of it?
00:28:16.720
Because that is really the heart of the bodily autonomy argument.
00:28:27.480
I don't need to recite these statistics for you.
00:28:30.380
The percentage of women who get abortions because the baby poses a direct threat to their lives.
00:28:39.480
By direct threat to their lives, you mean they're going to lose their life?
00:28:43.540
Well, Michael, do you know what the leading cause of death for pregnant people is?
00:28:52.600
Not all of them are mothers, but if you'd like to call them that.
00:29:06.240
It's interesting because you come into this conversation, you know, trying to hold this
00:29:14.120
But when I use inclusive language, which it only takes a couple extra syllables to use inclusive
00:29:19.320
And it seems to include people who don't, you know, identify as women but can become
00:29:24.120
So, like a person who's born a woman and then identifies as a man and is pregnant.
00:29:32.940
So you're telling me that in order to be a moral person, I need to accept the idea that
00:29:38.100
a man, someone who is born a man and looks like a man, can really become a woman.
00:29:43.160
That's a prerequisite of my being a moral person.
00:29:47.880
To me, it is because if you are trying to deny someone of their identity and deny what
00:29:53.420
their life experience is, then that doesn't seem like a moral stance to me.
00:29:57.220
I want to be accepting and I want to respect people's life experiences and respect the way
00:30:02.620
that they want to identify and respect the way that they want to present themselves to
00:30:06.740
Bronte, I would like to identify, I do identify actually, as the correct person on this issue
00:30:14.980
I identify as being correct and more correct than you on this issue.
00:30:20.340
And I would just ask that you accept and affirm my identity.
00:30:26.420
Well, you are not a medical professional and abortion and pregnancy is a medical concern.
00:30:34.580
That's very different from your sexual and gender identity.
00:30:40.880
I mean, don't you think, I'm not just talking about my gonads or something like that.
00:30:44.840
I'm talking about, I'm not just talking about my sexual appetites or desires.
00:30:47.800
I'm talking about my mind, my capacity for reason, my judgment here.
00:30:52.800
And so you're saying you don't respect that identity, but you do respect the identity of
00:30:59.980
I'm saying that you are someone without medical training and pregnancy is a medical condition
00:31:05.840
And so we need to abide by the informed and knowledgeable opinions of medical experts.
00:31:12.700
Again, you are entitled to your opinion, but you are not an informed and knowledgeable
00:31:18.960
So your opinion is not equal and should not override the opinions of medical experts on
00:31:25.580
And they have stated unequivocally that abortion access is essential to comprehensive, evidence-based
00:31:32.740
Bronte, do you, are you a trained epistemologist?
00:31:39.120
And yet you are making claims about knowledge and how knowledge can be ascertained and expressed,
00:31:48.020
So it seems to me if I'm not allowed to have opinions about abortion because I'm not a trained
00:31:52.220
medical professional, you surely shouldn't be permitted to have opinions about how people
00:31:56.380
hold opinions if you're not trained in the very study of knowledge, epistemology.
00:32:01.020
If you have a heart condition, who do you go to?
00:32:03.200
Do you go to your deli worker or do you go to a cardiologist?
00:32:07.440
But if you have a philosophical question, who do you go to?
00:32:16.900
Well, ultimately, what we're talking about is human life, right?
00:32:21.380
I mean, that's the reason it's a controversial issue.
00:32:23.640
Well, yes, but also pregnant people are living human lives.
00:32:29.060
So we are talking about their life, and their life takes precedent when it comes to medical
00:32:34.400
Right, but that's—now you've moved out of the realm of the natural sciences.
00:32:38.780
Now you're into the realm of the philosophical science.
00:32:41.240
This is a fundamental principle of medical ethics.
00:32:44.740
This is a fundamental principle of medical ethics.
00:32:50.500
But you just said you're not a trained ethicist.
00:32:52.600
You're not—well, you said you're not a trained epistemologist.
00:32:55.740
I'm trained in medicine, and we've had to take multiple courses in medical ethics.
00:33:04.400
We have to take—I don't know if you know this, but when you are going through medical
00:33:07.500
training, you are trained in ethics, because otherwise doctors—
00:33:10.900
No, I should hope—I mean, I should hope that anybody who has any education at all would have
00:33:16.960
But you're—would you call yourself an expert in ethics and—
00:33:20.760
I would call myself knowledgeable, and also to be clear—
00:33:24.080
Right, but to be clear, as I said at the beginning of this discussion, we're not sitting here just
00:33:28.400
having a discussion about our differences in opinion.
00:33:30.980
I am here to educate you and your viewers on the guidelines and the published statements
00:33:36.920
of our country's leading medical experts, specifically the—
00:33:40.200
Not even just the unpublished ones, but the published ones.
00:33:42.140
But the published ones, the public published opinions of the American College of Obstetricians
00:33:46.720
and Gynecologists, who is our country's leading experts when it comes to the health and well-being
00:33:51.480
And they say, unequivocally—and you can look, there's also publications from Harvard, from
00:34:02.040
Our country's leading minds—our country's leading minds state that abortion access is
00:34:08.420
So you are entitled to your opinion, but it is not equal to the opinion of people who train
00:34:13.480
their entire lives to understand this subject deeply.
00:34:16.520
Well, if we're citing experts and the leading authorities, I would be remiss if I didn't cite
00:34:22.420
the President's Council on Bioethical Inquiry, which in the middle of the 2000s assembled
00:34:28.020
the nation's leading experts on bioethical questions from all of the top schools with all of the
00:34:33.820
And they concluded that abortion is bioethically unacceptable.
00:34:39.660
So I'm not quite sure why I'm supposed to trust the trade organization of American obstetricians
00:34:45.540
over the bioethicists, who certainly have far more expertise in this realm of knowledge
00:34:52.780
than the obstetricians, who might be very good at delivering babies, but might not be
00:34:56.700
quite as good at understanding matters of ethics and morality.
00:35:00.940
So obstetricians and gynecologists specialize in the health and well-being of pregnant people,
00:35:06.220
and pregnancy affects the health and well-being of pregnant people.
00:35:11.540
But when it comes to looking at a pregnant person, their health, when it comes to a medical
00:35:18.720
condition that it is between the life of the pregnant person and ending the pregnancy,
00:35:23.800
the life of the pregnant person takes precedent unless otherwise specified by the pregnant person,
00:35:31.520
Oh, so you're saying that the life of the mother takes precedent unless the mother says no.
00:35:38.940
Now, again, the only reason I keep bringing up this matter of bioethics is that statement
00:35:46.660
that you're making is not a statement that pertains to natural science.
00:35:50.400
It's in the way that I would say, you know, if you want to get a baby out, you use this clamp.
00:35:54.200
Or, you know, if you want to make an incision into an abdomen, you use this sort of knife
00:35:58.100
When you say so-and-so's life takes precedence over someone else's life, that is a philosophical
00:36:05.860
statement and an ethical statement, which is different than a statement about, you know,
00:36:10.860
You know, this glass is made up of certain chemicals or whatever.
00:36:14.060
So that's why I think you're conflating those two realms here, and you're trying to trade
00:36:18.840
expertise from one realm in the natural sciences into expertise in another realm, which would
00:36:24.480
And I'm all for trying to bring these things together in a, you know, university-style way.
00:36:29.900
You know, you bring knowledge together because everything affects everything else.
00:36:33.340
But I think it's just disingenuous to claim then that obstetricians are the be-all and end-all
00:36:40.420
It's also worth pointing out these threats to the life of the mother are, threats to her
00:36:49.160
I mean, far less than 1% of people who have abortions do so because of a threat to the life of the
00:36:54.160
There is no medical condition for which the treatment is abortion.
00:36:59.700
But also, as I asked you before, do you know the leading cause of death for pregnant people?
00:37:04.980
I assume it's some comorbidity of, you know, I don't know, obesity or heart disease or something
00:37:15.860
Homicide is the number one cause of death for pregnant people.
00:37:18.380
The number one cause of death for babies and abortion, too.
00:37:21.580
But we are talking about living, breathing people who are people's daughters, sisters,
00:37:27.920
Did you know 59% of people who get abortions already have children?
00:37:32.300
And so we're talking about them prioritizing their needs and their life and you trying
00:37:37.760
to limit their ability to care for their already existing children.
00:37:41.900
And the number one cause of death for pregnant people, you do.
00:37:44.960
Because, you know, being able to afford medical care for pregnancy and labor takes away from
00:37:51.420
their ability to care for their already existing children.
00:37:56.560
So if we're talking about $500 here or there, which, again, I think we already pointed out
00:38:00.900
can be taken care of through any number of organizations, through the state and through
00:38:05.180
But if, you know, we're talking about the difference of $500 here, the cost of raising
00:38:12.320
It's hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars.
00:38:14.420
And so if you won't be able to raise your children because of a $500 cost, then you're
00:38:25.620
But a $500 cost is the average cost of an abortion.
00:38:29.140
The average cost of pregnancy and labor is $18,000 without insurance, about $3,000 with
00:38:35.320
And so I don't, you know, again, I see that you see yourself as a compassionate and moral
00:38:41.820
I don't know that I see myself that way, but I certainly strive to be.
00:38:44.000
It doesn't seem so when you try to consistently minimize these hardships that people are encountering
00:38:49.660
and you say it's not that much, it's not that big of a deal.
00:38:51.360
No, I just think that it is better for a mother to endure the discomfort and
00:38:59.020
cost of pregnancy than it is for her to murder her child is really what I think.
00:39:05.160
But it's also not your right to decide what the amount of risk someone should take, what
00:39:12.140
amount of harm they should endure without their consent.
00:39:16.120
Why is it not your right to decide what sort of risk that I should take over my body?
00:39:23.340
Because it is my body and I get to decide what kind of health risks that I accept.
00:39:27.480
But we've already established that, especially in a self-governing republic, we pass all
00:39:32.900
sorts of laws that restrict people's bodily autonomy, like drug laws.
00:39:36.040
So why is it my right to pass a law about you using heroin, but not my right to pass
00:39:44.460
a law that prevents you from murdering your child?
00:39:46.260
For that matter, we live in a self-governing republic.
00:39:48.700
We have laws against murder that limits what people can do with their own bodies to somebody
00:39:53.620
else in exactly the same way that a law against abortion would limit what you can do with your
00:40:00.220
Can you tell me a scenario where you can force someone to use their body to save the life
00:40:13.440
So you can't describe any other scenario where one human can be forced against their will
00:40:20.200
to use their body to save the life of another person.
00:40:24.320
I mean, I wouldn't be opposed to a law that says, you know, if you see a little kid drowning
00:40:29.800
in a pool, you have an obligation to jump in the pool and pull the kid out.
00:40:33.700
I mean, I think that would be perfectly reasonable.
00:40:35.300
That's not the same thing as using your internal organs and bodily resources.
00:40:39.360
Yeah, your internal organs, that would be unique to motherhood, yeah.
00:40:42.240
And so the fact that there is no other scenario where you can force a living person to use
00:40:48.480
their body to save the life of another person means that you are trying to grant fetuses
00:40:55.680
No, I think you're right to describe motherhood as a singular phenomenon.
00:41:00.420
And motherhood is something that half of the population can possibly experience.
00:41:06.180
And the fact that there is half the population that will never have the possibility of experiencing
00:41:13.600
Makes it so that when you are pushing for abortion bans, it is essentially a sexist issue
00:41:21.240
Bronte, you know that the pro-life movement is mostly women.
00:41:23.940
And you know that women are split 50-50 on the issue.
00:41:29.800
The movement against abortion is mostly women and women are split basically 50-50 in America
00:41:36.980
So to call it sexist or misogynist or whatever seems a little bit silly.
00:41:41.280
It would seem to me that you are describing this as, you know, the men forcing this on
00:41:46.580
If you look at the makeup of the movement against abortion, I call it the pro-life movement,
00:41:51.000
and you look at the public opinion on abortion among women, it's mostly women.
00:41:56.460
So the Pew Research Center actually did surveys and found that 61% of Americans feel that abortion
00:42:05.120
29% of Americans found that it should be accessible in cases of rape, incest, or to protect the
00:42:16.380
You're saying 61% of Americans say it should be available in all cases.
00:42:21.120
And 29% say it should be available for victims of rape.
00:42:30.160
I would imagine that the number would say, well, certainly women who, you know, face an
00:42:34.980
existential risk from pregnancy, they should be able to have abortion.
00:42:42.100
I just wonder if you were misreading the statistics, because that doesn't seem credible to me.
00:42:49.820
Why would the number go down for a more dire situation?
00:42:52.760
No, 29% of Americans think that it should only be accessible.
00:42:59.740
And so I just want to make it clear that 29% of Americans think that it should only be
00:43:04.300
accessible for in cases of rape, incest, or the risk of life of the mother.
00:43:08.980
And so you are, and I understand that that might not even be the category that you find
00:43:13.420
yourself in, and only 9% of Americans believe that it should never be legal.
00:43:17.740
And so I just want to make it clear that you are in the minority on this issue, and your
00:43:23.840
The problem with the statistics, though, Bronte, is that, I mean, I'll just take your
00:43:27.700
word for it on the Pew numbers, but you can look at any number of polls on this issue
00:43:30.820
from Pew to Gallup to Harvard-Harris to all of these other people.
00:43:36.280
I think it was Gallup, but I forget which one it was, that shows that only 6% of Americans
00:43:39.700
believe that abortion should be legal in all circumstances.
00:43:43.560
94% of Americans believe that there should be some restrictions on abortion.
00:43:46.900
And when you get even more granular on it, you look at the way that the questions are
00:43:50.400
phrased, the numbers become even more malleable.
00:43:54.040
So, you know, there are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
00:43:57.260
I think just if you look at the way that people vote, you look at the way that people express
00:44:04.340
their views through their elected representatives on questions of abortion, it is roughly split.
00:44:09.260
That's why it's been a contentious issue for a very long time.
00:44:12.540
And so, you know, you can, I suppose you can have your statistics from your credible research
00:44:20.060
Yeah, you know, it's really easy to just discount statistics when you disagree with that.
00:44:26.880
But I think it's Gallup, but I could be wrong on that.
00:44:28.840
My resources are actually, they're also from Gallup.
00:44:31.240
Pew and Gallup, they published very similar numbers.
00:44:36.300
Well, I suppose I'll just have to go look it up.
00:44:39.500
I encourage your viewers to as well, because I really just want to reiterate that, you
00:44:45.700
America is really split, when really we are not.
00:44:49.120
61% of Americans feel that abortion should be accessible in all or most cases.
00:44:56.420
But Bronte, the thing is, and again, by my statistics, you know, that those numbers are
00:45:02.420
very different, and by the statistics at the pro-lifers side.
00:45:05.900
But even if that were the case, let's say it's 61%, okay, 61% are pro-abortion, 60% are
00:45:17.140
It's still, you know, it's still roughly split, though, by your numbers, that's obviously
00:45:24.420
I mean, that doesn't, you know, the mob of people killed Socrates.
00:45:30.780
Are we really saying that the measure of right and wrong is some conveniently selected public
00:45:44.400
95% of OBGYNs say that they would assist a patient in receiving an abortion regardless
00:45:54.840
So an OBGYN could think that what he or she is doing is actually murdering a baby, and
00:46:03.720
Well, I certainly don't trust that person's judgment.
00:46:09.460
Because when we look at the people in our society who are trained to care for the health
00:46:15.340
and well-being of pregnant people, even they understand, 95% of them understand that their
00:46:22.580
personal feelings about this matter cannot override and should not override a patient's
00:46:30.980
So why do they have those personal feelings at all?
00:46:33.500
Because your opinion is about your body and your life alone.
00:46:37.720
No, well, we've established we can have opinions about all sorts of things that aren't
00:46:42.200
But as I said before, the leading cause of death for pregnant people is homicide.
00:46:46.060
And I bring that up because you cannot pretend like you understand the situations that people
00:46:53.380
So what you're telling me is that if a woman is threatened with murder by her boyfriend
00:46:59.780
because the boyfriend doesn't want her to be pregnant or something like that, that
00:47:05.540
is why we need to basically give those women the option to kill their baby because their
00:47:13.500
psychopath boyfriends might murder them if they don't murder their own child.
00:47:17.020
That's what you're telling me the solution is to these murderous boyfriends that you're
00:47:21.540
Are you minimizing the threat to someone's life?
00:47:24.480
No, I just think that I don't think the solution to a boyfriend threatening to kill a girlfriend
00:47:29.220
if she doesn't kill her own child is to encourage the girlfriend to kill her own child.
00:47:37.160
Wouldn't it be better to send in the civil authority to arrest the murderous boyfriend
00:47:45.680
What if the mother who is afraid of being murdered by her boyfriend wants to keep her child, but
00:47:50.180
she's afraid that she's going to get murdered so she feels that it'll just be sort of safer
00:47:55.280
for her to go kill the child even if this, there was a video of this that just went viral recently
00:47:59.800
of a clearly abusive boyfriend who was trying to throw his pregnant girlfriend into a car
00:48:05.380
It went viral, I think, about six months or so ago.
00:48:07.900
And the woman clearly doesn't want to get the abortion and the boyfriend really wants her
00:48:12.160
It's the exact situation that you're describing.
00:48:13.900
You think that the solution to that is to make it easier for the woman to get the abortion?
00:48:20.320
To make it easier to give the murderous boyfriend what he wants?
00:48:23.120
What I am saying, well, no, because this entire thing is about consent.
00:48:34.320
I think the baby's heart is the heart of the issue.
00:48:36.500
I think the baby's life is the heart of the issue.
00:48:38.620
Consent plays a role in moral judgments, but it's not the only criterion that we consider
00:48:44.960
So can I ask you, why do you find it so easy to have compassion for a fetus or a baby that
00:48:52.720
is non-autonomous and has absolutely no awareness of its own existence, but you find it so difficult
00:48:59.700
to expand that compassion towards pregnant people?
00:49:04.700
I don't think it's good for pregnant people, also known as mothers, to kill their children.
00:49:12.100
I also would have to push back on your argument that babies in the womb do not have any awareness.
00:49:19.740
They do have some awareness, and they do react to their environments.
00:49:23.760
They can kick, and they can move, and they can...
00:49:25.720
When the mother eats something that's maybe a little spicy, the baby will actually get
00:49:30.320
And when you describe, I don't know, self-awareness, I mean, yeah, it's true the baby in the womb does
00:49:36.280
not have consciousness, you know, is it not going to discourse on, you know, Aristotle
00:49:42.200
But a six-month-old baby isn't really conscious either, right?
00:49:45.800
Certainly a newborn baby has no more consciousness than the baby in the womb does.
00:49:57.640
We can talk about different numbers, but are you aware of the time in which 80% of abortions
00:50:10.560
Okay, so 80% of abortions occur before week nine, and, you know, you say that their babies
00:50:17.160
Are you aware of what a nine-week-old fetus looks like?
00:50:26.100
That's, you know, especially when you go in and you have your babies, you go in for an
00:50:31.420
By the eight-week appointment, they can tell you the sex of your baby, which is amazing.
00:50:36.720
By the 10-week appointment, they've got basically all of their features formed in a very rudimentary
00:50:42.140
way, but they're already quite formed, and you can look, and they no longer look like
00:50:48.800
They've got their little fingers already and their little toes.
00:51:03.440
I would like to, if you want to look at that, and you would like to look at that, you can
00:51:11.100
It's not like any ultrasound I've ever looked at, though.
00:51:13.400
That's why I brought them, because when it comes...
00:51:22.060
To discount misinformation that is spread about this issue, just like you do.
00:51:33.380
So you're saying that a baby that has been sucked out and dismembered looks a little
00:51:38.360
They aren't dismembered, because there isn't enough of them to be...
00:51:42.960
The fetus is barely recognizable to the naked eye at nine weeks.
00:51:49.600
So at nine weeks, it's usually just a pill that expels the fetus.
00:51:55.720
Yeah, it basically makes the uterine lining not able to...
00:51:59.900
Or the fetus not able to adhere to the uterine lining, and it sheds it.
00:52:15.620
What they will do is it's no longer going to be a pill.
00:52:18.060
They essentially inject like saline solution, and they inject, and it removes it from the uterine
00:52:33.180
Yeah, I'm not saying it's cyanide or something like that, but it's...
00:52:42.780
If I put saline solution on a slug, it'll shrivel up and die.
00:52:48.280
Do humans react the same way to saline solution as slugs do?
00:52:56.360
To dissolve the connection between the mother...
00:52:57.740
Between the baby and the placenta and the mother, and to flush out the poor little baby.
00:53:02.080
So this is why I think it's really ghastly and disingenuous of you to...
00:53:05.460
No, I'm bringing this because you consistently want to anthropomorphize this issue.
00:53:18.880
But you know, you're accusing me of anthropomorphizing a human being.
00:53:25.240
And I bring this to try to address misinformation about...
00:53:30.980
Sure, it's just really ghastly to show a picture of a person who's been killed.
00:53:37.260
Your apology implies that you'll correct your behavior.
00:53:40.320
Because people such as yourself and there are different, multiple different websites that like to share propaganda about this issue.
00:53:49.360
And I am here to try to present a medically accurate representation of this issue.
00:53:58.000
And when you try to act as though it is murder, I want your audience to truly, truly understand what we are talking about.
00:54:08.740
Because I am not saying that a woman with a desired pregnancy shouldn't feel connected to her fetus.
00:54:19.720
When we have a person with an unwanted pregnancy, you cannot act as though their choice to, you know, decide what is best for their life and their body is murder.
00:54:35.100
When in reality, it is a living person standing in front of you who's a living, breathing person with dreams and aspirations who is a mother, sister, you know, daughter.
00:54:47.440
No, 59% of people who get abortions are mothers with existing children.
00:54:57.600
I mean, Bronte, what's so confusing about this to me, and what's very silly, I think, about showing pictures of aborted babies, is it would be as though if you were to ask me to show you a picture of, you know, what does an Italian guy in New York look like?
00:55:14.320
Okay, and I showed you a picture of a young 25-year-old Italian guy splayed out on the street, chopped up, bleeding dead, versus, you know, an Italian boy, you know, eating a bowl of spaghetti or something like that.
00:55:31.240
Those two pictures would look very, very different.
00:55:32.940
And so the trick, the deception that you've engaged in, is you've taken a baby who has been killed for abortion and been separated from his mother and splayed out and squeezed out and looks unrecognizable.
00:55:46.940
And what you're pretending is that that cadaver is what a baby who has not been killed by his mother, who is still in the womb and who is growing and who is exhibiting all the signs of life and who is moving and who has little fingernails, even in a small...
00:56:03.980
If you look at this, primarily most of the tissue here is the gestational sac because the beginnings of pregnancy, the gestational sac and the placenta are some of the first things created because that is what attaches to the uterine lining and provides the fetus with resources and expels its waste.
00:56:20.280
That is primarily in the first few weeks of pregnancy.
00:56:23.380
Those are the tissue contents that are created before the fetus is really developed.
00:56:28.580
And a nine-week-old fetus, like I have here, the fetus itself is hardly distinguishable to the human eye.
00:56:42.200
Because when you present this, you say, well, actually, this mostly isn't the fetus.
00:56:49.120
But then you're not showing me what a fetus looks like.
00:56:58.900
Oh, so now all you're saying is the fetus at that stage, it's not that the fetus, you
00:57:12.720
So now what you're admitting is you're not showing people a picture of a fetus.
00:57:17.500
You're showing people a picture of a gestational sac that's been expelled with a tiny fetus.
00:57:21.680
If you wanted to show people what a fetus looks like at the age of 10 weeks in gestation, you
00:57:27.880
And you would have to zoom in because it's a very tiny little guy.
00:57:29.440
You would have to use a microscope in order to see it.
00:57:34.100
We have plenty of medical technologies which are being put to great evil.
00:57:37.340
But we can also put them to good use and show what the baby looks like.
00:57:41.440
At 10 weeks, the baby looks like a baby and has little fingernails and little toes and
00:57:52.600
So when we talk about abortion, 80% of abortions, this is the contents.
00:58:02.480
Michael, I allowed you to finish and I would...
00:58:05.380
But I guess I just don't want to move past this point.
00:58:08.640
Your argument now is not that the baby looks in a way that you wouldn't expect the baby to
00:58:13.740
Your argument is simply that abortion is permissible at this stage because the baby is very,
00:58:18.580
very small and you can't see him in my photograph.
00:58:20.700
No, I am saying that abortion is permissible because it is about the use of the person's
00:58:28.420
And I bring these photos because there is so much misinformation put out about this issue.
00:58:35.160
Well, like you like to say, oh, they react when you eat something spicy.
00:58:40.040
When in reality, the fetus at nine weeks where 80% of abortions occur is hardly distinguishable
00:58:47.920
So to say that a living person sitting in front of you with dreams and aspirations and health
00:58:54.820
situations and financial situations, mental situations that you cannot possibly understand,
00:59:01.200
when they're sitting in front of you telling you that they do not consent, whether it be
00:59:06.500
because they cannot or will not, you know, endure a pregnancy, you are saying that the tissue
00:59:12.900
within their uterus, which is primarily just a gestational sac and a microscopic fetus, that
00:59:20.160
is worth more than their desires about their own body.
00:59:24.720
And, you know, when misinformation is spread about this issue, it is as if these babies are
00:59:29.980
dismembered and is this very emotional and manipulative language used, when in reality,
00:59:36.820
They've only been poisoned with a pill and flushed out.
00:59:40.520
They've made the uterus uninhabitable, so then it is expelled.
00:59:47.680
But the point you're making here, Bronte, is you're saying it's misinformation when I say
00:59:51.520
that a baby at 10 weeks in gestation has little fingers and toes.
00:59:57.300
I'm saying that it's not distinguishable and it is not, you can't even see it with the
01:00:07.540
You do, but I can't see them with the human eye.
01:00:10.800
But if I took my shoes off, they are distinguishable to the human eye.
01:00:13.440
Now, what if you were five miles away and I couldn't see your toes five miles away with
01:00:20.820
Is this picture five miles away from you, Michael?
01:00:24.200
What I am saying is you can't see my toes because they're within my shoe.
01:00:28.080
You can't see a fetus because it is inside of a person.
01:00:31.480
When it is removed from that person, you still cannot see the fetus, whether you are five
01:00:39.300
And you trying to use emotionally manipulative language to reach your audience and try to
01:00:44.760
get them to vote to ban abortion against the opinion of medical experts.
01:00:50.520
That is why I bring these photos because there are hardly any medically accurate photos
01:00:57.600
And instead, it is primarily illustrations and propaganda that is pushed to manipulate
01:01:03.500
people into removing the bodily autonomy from their fellow citizens.
01:01:07.580
When in reality, these fetuses are hardly distinguishable to the human eye.
01:01:12.420
And we should instead look at the person that I can see in front of me and respect their right
01:01:20.180
She is a living, breathing person with desires.
01:01:26.960
So if the pregnant mother is intubated, then we can kill her?
01:01:35.660
So if we have someone who's on life support, what are they connected to?
01:01:46.620
So when you use this analogy, there's two options.
01:01:50.260
Either you didn't think your analogy through very well, or you think that living people
01:01:56.960
are equivalent to inanimate objects and machines.
01:02:01.040
And so if that pregnant person who is intubated and connected to a machine, if instead they
01:02:06.520
needed to be connected to a living person in order to survive, our current laws and medical
01:02:12.760
ethics would never allow you to force someone to connect themselves to that person to keep
01:02:19.680
Unless we're talking about the unique case of motherhood.
01:02:22.020
I mention it because you said that in order for a person to have a right to life, he needs
01:02:29.060
And then the other point here you've mentioned is that because I can't see a fetus at nine
01:02:36.020
weeks gestation with the naked eye, that he isn't real or doesn't exist or doesn't have
01:02:42.680
But I just, I wonder how you apply this principle.
01:02:45.800
Are you saying that the existence or inexistence of a thing is dependent upon whether or not
01:02:55.800
I am saying that even if you give a fetus all of the rights of a born living, breathing
01:03:04.000
person, they still cannot use someone's body to survive without their consent.
01:03:09.780
That's a good thing to discuss and I want to get to that.
01:03:12.700
But I don't think we can move past this naked eye thing, which just seems to me so preposterous.
01:03:18.420
You're saying because I can't see someone with a naked eye that that person doesn't exist?
01:03:24.120
I'm saying that someone that I can see and speak to standing in front of me cannot use
01:03:28.920
my body against my will and neither can someone that I cannot even distinguish without a microscope.
01:03:40.200
I mean, usually it's with your will because people generally consent to have sex and children.
01:03:44.960
But even if that were not the case, you just accidentally become pregnant or something
01:03:49.260
like that, it is simply a fact that your child can and does use your body even if it is against
01:03:56.100
So of course that can happen because we're talking about the unique case of motherhood.
01:03:59.900
And so you are arguing that in no other case can someone use someone else's body against
01:04:05.460
their will unless we're talking about motherhood.
01:04:07.940
So you only think that we should remove bodily autonomy from people with uteruses.
01:04:13.240
Well, I don't know what you mean by bodily autonomy.
01:04:15.180
We've already accepted at the beginning of our conversation that we don't have a total
01:04:19.560
inalienable right to do whatever we want with our own bodies.
01:04:22.600
It's interesting that you say that when you can't describe one scenario for me in which
01:04:29.920
No, I'm telling you, that would be a unique fact of motherhood.
01:04:34.100
And when I say bodily autonomy, that is what I mean.
01:04:36.360
I mean the use of your body and decisions about what happens to your body.
01:04:42.200
Decisions about what happens to your body, that's different because of the drug laws and the
01:04:46.300
Decisions when it comes to how your body is used.
01:04:56.100
That would be the case of laws against suicide and drug use.
01:05:00.920
But if we're talking about a baby growing inside you, yeah, of course, that's unique
01:05:09.620
And so you cannot describe one scenario where someone can use someone else's body.
01:05:14.800
And that's what I'm trying to describe is the only people in our society that you think
01:05:20.220
don't deserve full bodily autonomy are people with inter-sists.
01:05:25.680
If by bodily autonomy you mean the only people who can have babies grow inside them are mothers.
01:05:40.300
And those are the only people in our society that you are arguing should have their rights
01:05:45.900
Well, I don't think they have rights to kill babies.
01:05:48.320
Because you don't think that they have rights to their own body.
01:05:50.360
Well, yeah, I don't think people have a total right to do whatever they want with their
01:05:53.180
own bodies anyway, as we've already established.
01:05:55.040
But you don't believe that they have the right to remove consent.
01:06:01.840
If they don't consent to their body being used, you don't believe that they have the right
01:06:07.700
No, I think if you create a child, you don't have the right to kill them.
01:06:11.960
You don't think that if your body is being used against your will, that you have the
01:06:16.920
right to decide that you don't want that to happen?
01:06:19.680
In the case of a little baby, no, I don't think you have the right.
01:06:22.180
If you've changed your mind and you say, I don't like this baby anymore and I want
01:06:25.960
to kill him, I don't think you have the right to kill him, just because you no longer
01:06:29.380
Even though your opinion does not coincide with the opinions of medical experts.
01:06:34.120
Well, it certainly coincides with the opinions of bioethical experts and it's certainly with
01:06:37.800
some medical experts, but yeah, I don't really care what some maniac obstetrician.
01:06:40.940
Except for 95% of OBGYNs who are the country and the world's leading experts on pregnant
01:06:46.500
people, 95% of them would, you know, help their patient access abortion regardless of
01:06:52.820
You just told me a number of them would commit murder even though they think it's murder.
01:06:56.940
No, I'm telling you that people who spend their lives training to care for pregnant people
01:07:02.840
and understand the complexities of pregnancy and the lives of pregnant people understand
01:07:08.360
that regardless of their own feelings, that they cannot impede someone's access to medical
01:07:13.960
And so I understand that you might not feel like that's appropriate, but for me, I would
01:07:19.820
want my doctors who train their entire lives to be specialists in their field, I believe
01:07:25.120
that we should abide by their expertise and that someone who's not trained in the complexities
01:07:31.040
of medicine, their opinion should not override someone's opinion.
01:07:35.320
Well, I think we're talking a little bit in circles now.
01:07:38.160
And I don't think that the obstetricians necessarily have the greatest training in ethics or, you
01:07:45.460
know, philosophy or morality or anything like that.
01:07:50.860
Or I don't really trust the medical establishment on a whole host of issues because they tend to
01:07:54.320
get things wrong so frequently, sometimes egregiously wrong.
01:07:57.480
But regardless, I then have to ask, why has this become such a cause for you?
01:08:08.840
What is it about abortion where you say, this is my issue?
01:08:20.920
And seeing the rights to our bodies be removed against the expertise of medical experts, that
01:08:28.100
is a passionate issue for me because I am trained and passionate in defending the opinions
01:08:37.720
Well, I mean, I've always been pro-choice my entire life.
01:08:41.760
Ironically, I grew up in Texas and I grew up Republican, but I was always, yeah.
01:08:54.200
I became educated and informed and I realized that, you know, my opinions on certain things
01:09:01.020
were completely removed from the reality of the issue.
01:09:04.340
And then the deeper and deeper that I got into my education, like I said, I got my master's.
01:09:09.320
And I realized that people who train their entire lives to analyze this issue are, you
01:09:19.180
And there's 95% of them that agree that this is a, we should have access to this.
01:09:24.800
If the American Academy of Obstetricians or whatever the group is, if they told you to
01:09:34.240
Well, it would be, depending on how well you swim.
01:09:43.300
If they told you that the best treatment for cancer is to eat a lollipop jumping on
01:09:48.700
If they showed me the science behind it, then sure.
01:09:53.560
Because then you're using, because then you're not just deferring to the experts.
01:10:00.020
And so if they are able to show me the evidence behind their opinion, which all medical experts
01:10:07.620
Which on this issue of abortion and abortion access, they're able to show multitudes of
01:10:15.860
No, why banning abortion access actually harms more people.
01:10:19.120
So Colorado University actually did a study showing that abortion bans are likely going
01:10:23.840
to increase maternal mortality by 24%, and that abortion bans do not minimize or decrease
01:10:33.160
So what happened to abortion after Roe v. Wade was decided?
01:10:45.360
But a lot of people, because abortions become illegal and they are difficult to quantify.
01:10:49.580
No, but Roe v. Wade made abortion legal nationally.
01:10:52.900
What happened to the total number of abortions?
01:10:54.040
The total number of abortions that are accessed through proper medical channels decreased, not
01:10:59.480
the amount of abortions that happen at people's homes unsafely and illegally.
01:11:09.920
So the total number of abortions that happened after abortion became legal, you just said that
01:11:16.500
Sorry, I thought you were referring to the overturning...
01:11:19.300
So 1973, because you were just saying that abortion bans actually don't reduce the number
01:11:27.380
No, it doesn't go the other way because people who desire an abortion and need an abortion
01:11:31.840
are going to access it regardless if it's illegal or legal, safe or unsafe.
01:11:35.660
But it has to go the other way because the question is, is the regulation of the abortion?
01:11:43.820
If you legalize abortion, it increases the safe and legal abortions.
01:11:48.060
If you ban abortion, it's going to increase the amount of illegal and unsafe abortion.
01:11:53.320
What about the total number of abortions, though?
01:11:56.740
The illegal ones and the legal ones and the bad ones you don't like and the good ones
01:12:02.760
Well, the safe and legal ones when Roe v. Wade in the 70s...
01:12:09.440
It's going to increase in the statistics because we can quantify the amount of people who receive
01:12:15.780
But we can also quantify the illegal ones, too.
01:12:19.500
Well, the abortions went way, way up and they actually doubled.
01:12:21.980
But even to your point on quantifying illegal abortions and legal abortions, you know, we
01:12:28.620
And there was this canard that went around that before Roe v. Wade, thousands of women
01:12:34.340
And you're referring to maternal mortality rates are being predicted by all the doom and gloom
01:12:43.000
How many women actually died the year before Roe v. Wade was decided from illegal abortions
01:12:48.780
I know that about 700 to 800 women die every year from pregnancy complications.
01:12:54.260
And I know that unsafe abortions are in the top four leading causes of maternal mortality.
01:12:59.700
But I don't know the amount of people who died prior to Roe v. Wade from illegal abortions.
01:13:03.540
It's 39 in the year before Roe v. Wade was decided.
01:13:08.320
And those 39 women, that's not a big enough number for you to care.
01:13:11.140
No, but do you know how many women died from legal abortions that year?
01:13:18.100
Now, if you look at the percentage of states where abortion was legal and illegal, the
01:13:21.840
craziest thing is that your likelihood of dying from a legal abortion or an illegal
01:13:28.740
I've seen that only in the past, I believe it was 2018, only two people died from complications.
01:13:36.520
Oh, well, of course, because the numbers declined dramatically.
01:13:38.880
The way that they got away with pretending that 5,000 women died a year from abortion,
01:13:42.220
other than Dr. Bernard Nathanson admitted that he just made it up when he was running NARAL.
01:13:46.440
But the reason is because decades prior, many more women died from abortions because medical
01:13:53.840
But so obviously, since 1973, medical care has progressed even more.
01:13:57.260
So you would expect that number to go down for legal and illegal.
01:13:59.840
The reason I bring it up is because those scare numbers are, I think they're just used
01:14:07.360
They deceive in that the numbers usually aren't right and they're dramatically wrong.
01:14:12.420
And because the number for the illegal and illegal were basically the same.
01:14:16.220
So my question for you is, it seems like you consistently want to find ways to minimize
01:14:23.160
the harm that is experienced by pregnant people.
01:14:26.180
And you really want to hone in on mortality, right?
01:14:29.720
Because you think that death is the only negative outcome of pregnancy.
01:14:34.000
There's a lot of suffering that goes along with pregnancy.
01:14:36.040
And you think that you get to decide that people who become pregnant should just be obligated
01:14:42.380
Yes, if the alternative is killing the baby, then yes, yes.
01:14:45.060
So even though the fetus that is completely unaware of its own existence and is not even...
01:14:49.520
A three-month-old baby is unaware of its own existence.
01:14:51.280
Right, but people aren't getting abortions at three months.
01:14:54.360
And people who do get abortions at three months, it is largely because of medical concerns
01:14:58.680
or because they do not have timely access to medical care.
01:15:15.060
Because we understand the neural networks that are required in order for you to perceive
01:15:20.240
And those neural networks are not present at nine weeks.
01:15:22.760
Yeah, well, it's questionable because people keep moving the definition.
01:15:27.140
So you could say that a baby at 10 weeks has a beating heart.
01:15:32.140
But usually it doesn't actually have a beating heart because it doesn't look totally
01:15:35.040
No, because it doesn't have all of the chambers of your heart.
01:15:39.480
It is the electrical cells that are able to have an electrical impulse.
01:15:44.960
You know, when you use this language, like the heart is beating and it has a beating heart.
01:15:51.260
Actually, that's a simulated heart sound because it is an electrical impulse.
01:15:58.000
Say we listen with a stethoscope, the heart sounds are made from the valves of your heart
01:16:04.600
And when you don't have the proper chambers of your heart at that week of gestation, many
01:16:10.480
times the sound on the ultrasound machine is a simulated sound.
01:16:14.940
It can pick up the electrical impulses, but it's a simulated sound.
01:16:19.240
It's translating a represented into a representation.
01:16:24.200
So it is true that a baby at 10 weeks gestation is different, in a way, from a 10-year-old kid.
01:16:31.900
Different meaning undeveloped, non-sentient, non-autonomous.
01:16:37.860
But it's more developed than it was at nine weeks.
01:16:40.920
So, yes, it's true that it translates that heart impulse into a sound in some cases.
01:16:50.460
The sound is a representation of what is and will further become the baby's heart.
01:17:00.540
But it is not existing in the way that you want.
01:17:07.840
Yeah, it's cells proper to a 10-week-old baby that are different in some way from cells that
01:17:14.680
have a 15-week-old baby and a 10-year-old baby and a 25-year-old.
01:17:17.360
And again, I'm going to continue to repeat, even if you want to apply all of the same rights
01:17:23.960
that a living, breathing person has, you want to give the fetus those same rights, nobody
01:17:29.400
has the right to use your body against your will.
01:17:35.700
And so when you want to remove the right for someone to decide what happens to their body,
01:17:39.660
you're arguing that the only people who should have those rights to their body removed are
01:17:43.740
people with uteruses who become purposefully or accidentally pregnant.
01:17:47.020
They are not deserving of basic human rights, and that is what you were trying to say.
01:17:50.460
I really like people with uteruses, so I have no problem with them.
01:17:53.980
Right, when you get to decide what happens to their body, when they are trying to decide
01:17:57.440
Well, we live in self-governance, so yeah, we make all sorts of decisions about how we
01:18:01.540
But you keep going back to rights, which is interesting to me, because I don't think of
01:18:10.120
Fundamental rights to do whatever I want with my body in these circumstances or whatever.
01:18:14.460
So, okay, if we're talking about rights, are all rights equal?
01:18:18.820
Are all rights on this, you know, my right to have this pink fruity drink here, is that
01:18:22.320
the same as your right to, I don't know, drive a car or something?
01:18:30.160
Is there one most important right that you would call it a fundamental right, the fundamental
01:18:35.300
The right to your body and the right to decide what happens to your body.
01:18:45.140
Well, it seemed to me that the right to your body and the right to do certain things to
01:18:49.860
your body must necessarily be preceded by the right to life, without which you do not have
01:18:55.060
your body or the ability to do anything at all.
01:18:57.100
Well, and as I've described, your right to life does not get to supersede or override someone
01:19:13.540
Because it seems to me, if we're going to have any rights at all, the right to drink
01:19:16.580
my fruity drink, the right to have a lovely conversation in this kind of black room here,
01:19:20.740
any of these other rights, that all of those rights depend upon the right to life, which
01:19:25.400
is not just one right among many, but it is the fundamental right.
01:19:29.160
And so therefore, if rights are to have any meaning at all, the right to life must supersede
01:19:38.260
I think that you have, I think you have a right to life, but your right to life does
01:19:43.080
not override someone's right to bodily autonomy.
01:19:47.800
Because you, as I've asked you quite a few times now, you cannot describe to me one instance,
01:19:54.380
except motherhood, where it is acceptable for you to use someone's-
01:19:59.200
But I'm just saying, you are saying that the right to do whatever you want with your body
01:20:07.020
And I explained to you why I think that the right to life is fundamental and more important
01:20:13.760
And I gave you, maybe you don't like my argument or something, but I think I at least spelled
01:20:17.120
it out in a way that's fairly clear and logical.
01:20:19.400
So what is your argument as to why the right to control your own body is more fundamental
01:20:27.780
Because I think that if you allow the government to decide that someone else's right to life can
01:20:33.980
override your right to bodily autonomy, that is opening the door for a lot of terrifying
01:20:39.280
This is why you have to volunteer to be an organ donor.
01:20:42.100
This is why you have to volunteer to be a blood donor.
01:20:46.420
If we allowed the government to say that someone else's right to life can supersede your right
01:20:53.300
to your body, that is a pretty terrifying amount of power to give to the government.
01:20:57.480
No, but we're speaking about, I mean, you're talking about organ donations, but we're speaking
01:21:12.460
Maybe I do to filter all these terrible things I put into my body.
01:21:19.000
But it would be wrong if the government came in and said, Michael, we're taking your kidney
01:21:24.840
I might give it to you voluntarily, but I certainly wouldn't want someone coming in
01:21:31.180
Even if you were in dire straits, I wouldn't, I still might give it to you, but I don't
01:21:37.180
And I don't think that I have an obligation to give you my kidney.
01:21:43.560
But in the same way, a woman's womb is for nurturing a child.
01:21:56.080
So I don't think that the analogy that you're making here is apt.
01:22:00.440
I think, once again, it gets back to the unique status of motherhood.
01:22:05.460
So the same thing can be said for your liver, right?
01:22:11.020
Well, but your liver, the purpose of your liver is to detoxify your blood.
01:22:19.240
But if I don't ingest those toxins, then my liver doesn't have to do that job.
01:22:24.100
If I don't choose to harbor a fetus, my uterus doesn't have to harbor that fetus.
01:22:29.560
Just because your body can do something doesn't mean that you should be compelled for it to do
01:22:34.820
If you choose not to have a drink, then your liver is not going to process alcohol.
01:22:42.800
But if you decide after, I don't know, you had a crazy weekend, you went out here to Nashville,
01:22:49.200
You would never do this, but I'm saying women of ill repute would go out and they meet a guy.
01:22:56.300
Anyway, the next morning she finds out she's pregnant.
01:23:04.800
She says, oh darn, I don't want to be pregnant.
01:23:07.160
And you know, that baby has no right to be in my womb.
01:23:10.820
She has engaged in behavior that would introduce the baby into her womb in a way that if you
01:23:16.820
put the drink down, you will not be introducing alcohol to your liver.
01:23:19.660
So should we then deny health care to alcoholics because they partook in behaviors that caused
01:23:28.720
Should we deny smokers access to medical care because they partook in behaviors that damaged
01:23:39.520
I don't think we should kill them or steal their livers or anything like that.
01:23:43.160
I don't think we should go in and kill the baby just because the mother wants to—
01:23:45.800
But you are saying that you get to judge someone based off of their behaviors.
01:23:51.960
And because of those behaviors, you believe that they should be denied access to health
01:23:56.000
care in order to address the effects of those behaviors.
01:23:59.400
And not if it's a drinker, not if it's a smoker, but if it's a woman, then sure, now
01:24:04.300
we get to remove the right to her body and the effects of her behavior.
01:24:08.240
No, well, and I guess we're again missing the point.
01:24:11.100
I don't think a mother ever has the right to kill her child in any circumstances.
01:24:15.000
So I'm not suggesting that we single mothers out here or that it would be very judgmental
01:24:21.220
or anything like that or deny anybody health care.
01:24:23.620
I just don't think that killing a baby is ever health care.
01:24:29.840
When we talk about the distinction between babies and fetuses.
01:24:31.580
See, and that's where you're wrong, though, because when we've talked about maternal mortality
01:24:35.460
rates, we've talked about the number one cause of death for pregnant people is homicide.
01:24:38.840
Maternal mortality is still very low, by the way.
01:24:40.680
Do you know the amount of people who have, do you know the difference between maternal
01:24:49.180
So morbidity is essentially unforeseen or serious health effects of a medical condition.
01:24:55.220
So maternal morbidity is when someone experiences severe complications of pregnancy and labor.
01:25:00.620
And I know that you think that 700 to 800 women dying annually from pregnancy is too low for
01:25:08.040
Well, we should bring the number down, but we shouldn't kill 850,000 babies to pretend
01:25:13.320
So 60,000 people every year have serious maternal morbidity, which means there's certain codes that
01:25:21.440
they use, like insurance codes that they use to determine whether or not you experienced
01:25:27.520
And some of those codes are having an ICU admission or needing multiple blood transfusions,
01:25:33.360
And 60,000 women every year are admitted into the ICU or need blood transfusions, what have
01:25:41.380
That's the whole definition of a severe morbidity?
01:25:45.480
Are we talking about ICU or are we talking about certain things that are less severe?
01:25:51.240
So it depends because it can be sepsis, hemorrhage, I think pulmonary embolism.
01:25:57.760
There's multitudes of different complications that can't be classified.
01:26:01.000
We're not talking about something like tearing or something like that.
01:26:07.120
Is 60,000 women every year experience severe morbidity?
01:26:11.320
And that's not including the women who just develop things like diabetes or have a perineal
01:26:17.320
Well, that's actually a very important point that you bring up of some of these problems
01:26:22.540
Because something that the abortion advocates mention that often is not addressed by the
01:26:28.360
pro-life movement, not that I think it needs to be, but it's interesting nonetheless, is that
01:26:32.360
the United States is not the best when it comes to maternal mortality.
01:26:39.100
But the reason for that, of course, is not because of any conspiracy among the doctors
01:26:44.140
or misogyny or anything like that, I don't think.
01:26:46.820
I think it probably has more to do with America's disproportionate rates of obesity and heart
01:26:54.580
You look especially, it's not as though complications of pregnancy are the same across all demographics.
01:27:02.560
And the reason for that, it would seem to me, is that black women are much more likely to
01:27:08.020
be obese and to have heart problems and have diabetes and all those things that do factor
01:27:15.720
Again, I don't think any of that is a good argument to kill a bunch of babies every single
01:27:19.940
But that seems like a health issue that should be addressed elsewhere, right?
01:27:23.260
Getting people to exercise, put down the cupcake, not be so obese and have a heart problem.
01:27:27.620
Many pregnancy complications are unavoidable and unforeseen.
01:27:31.180
And so sure, there are comorbidities that make you more likely.
01:27:36.020
But when we live in a country where health care is inaccessible and unaffordable to a
01:27:41.040
large majority of Americans or a large percentage of Americans...
01:27:45.000
Well, yeah, it depends on the statistics and it depends on what you classify as unaffordable
01:27:50.700
Because someone can be living in a rural area and it'd be less accessible.
01:27:55.240
Someone can be in financial situations, it'd be unaffordable.
01:28:01.020
The thing is, this entire conversation, you are very fetus-centered, where I am very...
01:28:09.380
When we are going through these scenarios, you consistently center the fetus.
01:28:14.420
Where I consistently center the woman, I want to consider her health, her finances, her
01:28:24.260
Yes, because you believe that the only people in our society who shouldn't get to decide
01:28:29.240
what happens to their body are people with uteruses.
01:28:31.880
I don't think that people have an absolute right over their own body.
01:28:37.680
But I know, but you're putting an opinion into my head that I'm...
01:28:42.520
What you've said is you cannot tell me one scenario in society where someone can use someone's
01:28:46.960
body against their will, but unless that is a...
01:28:54.300
Yeah, well, that's in a completely different topic because that is, you know, essentially...
01:28:59.580
When you described it and you said, you know, name me a scenario where someone other than
01:29:04.460
a mother, or I'm sorry, a pregnant person has someone growing inside of them using their
01:29:15.840
I said, tell me a scenario where someone can use someone else's body without their consent.
01:29:26.460
Well, I mean, again, that is an issue in and of itself.
01:29:32.520
Like, that is definitely taking advantage of a broken system.
01:29:35.100
Well, yeah, but there are three purposes to criminal justice.
01:29:37.660
I guess this is a little bit of a pivot here, but it's not just rehabilitation.
01:29:47.800
And I just think it's funny that the only other scenario you can bring up is definitely
01:30:02.960
Again, I mean, this is, you know, going off into the weeds.
01:30:07.260
But I'm naturally a compassionate person, and I see the best in people.
01:30:11.280
And I believe especially a lot of crime is committed because of circumstances that people
01:30:18.440
I don't mean to be this blunt, but I guess I have to be.
01:30:21.260
You have been sitting here describing how it is good and moral to permit a system to
01:30:30.000
exist that kills 850,000 people who you admit are human beings every single year because
01:30:43.480
I think you're just extraordinarily confused and misguided.
01:30:45.820
But to say, you know, I'm such a compassionate person as I make it my jihad to permit the
01:30:53.240
killing of 850,000 babies, who I admit are babies every single year, seems to me absurd.
01:30:59.080
And this is why I bring up that you are entirely fetus-centered in this conversation, and you
01:31:04.740
completely disregard the trauma experienced by pregnant people.
01:31:09.720
I've said so many times that women suffer in pregnancy.
01:31:12.100
But you don't feel like it's worth protecting them from.
01:31:15.480
No, I think it's definitely worth protecting them and giving them the best medical care
01:31:18.760
I just don't think it's worth sanctioning the killing of 850,000 babies a year.
01:31:22.320
Giving people medical care does not, you know, minimize or does not get rid of the trauma
01:31:29.480
You can have all the medical care in the world available to you, and you still will experience
01:31:33.980
some trauma, some pain, and some suffering throughout your pregnancy.
01:31:42.500
You're just talking about rape, which is a very, very small percentage of abortions
01:31:50.280
But that is clearly the exception of the exception of the exception, not the rule.
01:32:05.580
But if it's consent to the possibility of pregnancy, then it is consent to pregnancy.
01:32:15.740
I mean, you've just said that when you consent to sex, you are acknowledging the possibility
01:32:28.580
If I consent to go to the bar, and I know that if I go to the bar, there is a possibility
01:32:38.180
And then I know if I get drunk, there's a possibility that I have a hangover the next morning.
01:32:43.620
Then when I go out there to that bar with the boys for a rowdy Saturday night, I am consenting
01:32:49.320
to that hangover that I am going to have, that will involve some suffering and maybe teach
01:32:54.840
So I don't say, how is that different with pregnancy?
01:33:00.200
So say that not, you just didn't have a hangover, because a hangover doesn't necessarily require
01:33:07.560
Should you go to the ER and then be turned away because they're like, well, you drank,
01:33:12.460
so you consented to the possibility of alcohol poisoning, and we have restricted your
01:33:16.500
access to medical care because you consented to the possibility of this happening?
01:33:20.020
But again, as we've pointed out, the issue of abortion does not merely concern the mother.
01:33:26.920
It concerns this other person who you've admitted is a human being.
01:33:29.680
So I think a more apt analogy would be, if I go out to the bar, and I wake up, and I've
01:33:34.960
got this headache, and my kid just won't stop crying.
01:33:43.680
And so I say, you know, I've got to kill my kid.
01:33:46.640
I've got to kill my kid to shut him up because he's crying too much.
01:33:48.980
And it's really, ah, my body and my head is just throbbing, and I'm suffering.
01:33:52.980
And it's just going to make me feel a lot better if I kill my little baby.
01:33:55.640
Who, by the way, is exactly as sentient, well, exactly as sentient, I'll even go further,
01:34:02.560
conscious, self-aware as the little baby in the womb.
01:34:13.100
If they are a born child who is autonomous, they are not equal to a fetus.
01:34:18.340
What do you think little babies are like if you think they're autonomous?
01:34:21.920
So you're confusing biological autonomy with functional autonomy.
01:34:29.000
So biological autonomy is when your bodily system can support itself, your organs can support
01:34:33.840
itself, and you do not need to be connected to another person biologically for your body
01:34:38.920
Oh, so maybe like a baby in the womb at 25 weeks.
01:34:44.360
When abortions do not happen then, when it comes, abortions that do happen then are largely
01:34:52.540
They don't happen then, or they do happen then, but it's okay.
01:34:56.460
There are like less than 1% of abortions happen.
01:34:58.760
And yet for some reason, states in America, like New York, are changing their laws in a hurry.
01:35:03.840
To permit abortion up until the moment of birth.
01:35:07.020
Abortion does not happen up until the moment of birth.
01:35:12.560
But Bronte, they did change the law in New York such that, and they actually changed the
01:35:15.840
penal code such that abortion is permitted in the state of New York up until the moment
01:35:24.100
It changed the penal code such that if you kill a pregnant woman, it's no longer double homicide.
01:35:28.420
They could not more clearly point out, they could not more clearly highlight through
01:35:33.340
the statute that abortion is permissible at any point in pregnancy up until the moment
01:35:37.520
See, it seems that you consistently want to demonize women, and you want to feel as though
01:35:44.200
But when you describe abortions happening right up until the moment of birth, you are describing
01:35:49.060
someone who has carried this fetus for like, you know, nine months, 40 weeks, whatever
01:35:53.740
it may be, and you are acting as though those people are completely unaware of the situation
01:36:02.600
And usually people who are at that point in their pregnancy have decorated the nursery,
01:36:07.200
have picked out a name, have went to prenatal appointments, things like that.
01:36:10.820
And so for you to try to say that women are wanting abortions right up until the moment
01:36:23.760
So then why do they keep changing the law in all of these liberal states?
01:36:26.460
They're changing the law to protect women and protect women's access because there's
01:36:30.520
also a lot of these laws that are trying to criminalize women for things like miscarriages.
01:36:37.920
All of that is protected, and especially because of the Doe decision.
01:36:42.060
People don't realize that the Roe v. Wade decision was really two cases, Roe and Doe,
01:36:46.140
And Doe creates this right that protects women's ability to have abortions for...
01:36:51.960
For psychological reasons, for emotional reasons, practically until the very end.
01:37:02.300
There was no risk whatsoever in New York that abortion was going to be criminalized,
01:37:08.020
or miscarriages were going to be criminalized, or whatever other propaganda comes out.
01:37:11.500
So if you're telling me that abortions do not happen late term, why would multiple liberal
01:37:19.520
governors and state legislatures change the law to permit abortion up until the moment
01:37:25.640
I'm not saying that I agree with those laws, but I also believe from what I've read as
01:37:31.340
The way that you're describing it is a misrepresentation of the purpose of the law, but I'm also not saying
01:37:35.760
that I personally agree with those laws, if that is what they state.
01:37:41.260
Well, because as I've said numerous times, I'm prioritizing the needs of the pregnant person,
01:37:47.200
But if you're going to prioritize the needs of the pregnant person, surely they should have
01:37:49.820
the greatest window possible to have an abortion, which would be up until the moment of birth,
01:37:56.340
I don't believe so, because I believe if you've reached that late term in the pregnancy, then
01:38:02.820
at that point, then the fetus has the ability to be viable and autonomous, and that is when
01:38:14.760
So post-viability, you think abortion should be illegal?
01:38:21.600
Well, by medical concerns, do you include, you know, emotional distress, or do you mean
01:38:28.700
I mean, not to discount medical or mental concerns, because those can be serious, but primarily
01:38:35.060
So you would support a post-viability abortion there?
01:38:41.200
With the exception of, you know, medical and protecting medical providers based on certain
01:38:59.180
Because, you know, a baby who's born, a newborn baby, can't do a damn thing.
01:39:03.340
You leave the baby outside, or even inside for 72 hours, the kid's going to die, right?
01:39:08.060
That's functional autonomy versus biological autonomy.
01:39:12.120
Biological and, no, biological autonomy and functional autonomy are two very different
01:39:17.960
But practically speaking, they're the same thing.
01:39:19.680
Because if you leave the baby, who you say is biologically autonomous, if you leave
01:39:24.280
that baby alone to his autonomous self for, let's say, five days even, that baby is going
01:39:31.460
That baby has no control over himself or his surroundings at all.
01:39:36.760
So it's really a distinction without a difference.
01:39:39.480
But the difference is anyone can provide food and shelter to that infant, where only the
01:39:45.840
singular pregnant person can provide the womb for the fetus.
01:39:51.200
That is where, and you can surrender your parental rights.
01:40:03.620
Because you cannot force someone to use their body and use their time in a way that they
01:40:10.360
Do you think parents of children who are five years old should be able to just renounce them
01:40:19.980
I mean, if they're incapable of providing a safe home.
01:40:23.280
What if they're capable and they just don't want to be a parent?
01:40:25.920
But if they're not mentally willing and capable, then the child will be taken.
01:40:33.000
It's some rich lawyer with a nice house in the suburbs, two cars, nice dinner every night.
01:40:40.180
You think they ought to have the right to renounce their parenthood?
01:40:44.040
That seems like that would be better for the child.
01:40:46.980
I wouldn't want the child to grow up in a home where they're unwanted and resented.
01:40:52.600
So yeah, I think that they should be able to give up their parental rights because
01:40:55.340
that doesn't seem like an appropriate environment for that child.
01:40:58.540
Well, if you're saying child protective services should go in and take the kids away, maybe
01:41:03.300
But I guess it's just this right part, because you keep coming down to consent and rights.
01:41:09.100
If you're saying that a parent of sound mind really has the right to abandon his own children,
01:41:20.060
I would never want a child to grow up in a home where they're resented and abused because
01:41:24.820
their parent isn't willing to take care of them.
01:41:28.100
Why should we force a child to stay in that environment?
01:41:31.120
We're not talking about what is prudentially best for the child.
01:41:35.140
That's not what we're prioritizing, the needs of the child?
01:41:41.200
You're saying a parent has a right to renounce his or her child?
01:41:44.960
Again, if it is prioritizing the well-being of the child, I think that the government...
01:41:51.700
Why would staying in an abusive home where they're...
01:41:57.680
I'm telling you, all things being equal, this guy, this nice guy and his wife, you know,
01:42:12.000
And it'd be a little easier if they could renounce the child.
01:42:13.680
But I'm really focusing on this question of rights because I think that's where the
01:42:23.380
Again, prioritizing the well-being of the child.
01:42:26.520
If they're in an environment in which they are unwanted, then that is not an appropriate
01:42:32.040
And I believe that if a parent is unwilling to care for that child appropriately and...
01:42:39.320
No, I just think that you continuously want to ignore the well-being of people that we
01:42:47.640
I don't want to kill them to the tune of 800,000 years.
01:42:48.220
Whenever I bring up the well-being of people, it seems like you're like, that's not the
01:42:56.940
And then when I focus on rights, you shift to well-being.
01:42:59.740
And then when I focus on well-being, you shift to rights.
01:43:01.660
And so I think you're trying to evade the topic.
01:43:07.380
Our rights protect our well-being, and our rights basically have a large effect on our
01:43:14.680
We decide what our rights are depending on the way that they affect our health and our
01:43:27.080
This might help me to understand your view on abortion.
01:43:29.960
Well, it depends on what kind of rights you're talking about.
01:43:32.540
Because in a society, our government is a system designed to protect our rights.
01:43:47.620
Because essentially, if we were cavemen, we wouldn't necessarily decide that we had rights,
01:43:54.040
I think cavemen were a lot smarter than we give them credit for.
01:43:56.400
Oh, the only thing we know about cavemen is that they painted on the walls.
01:43:59.000
The only thing we know about cavemen is that they were artists.
01:44:01.340
So I think they probably had a pretty good intuition of these things.
01:44:04.380
But I mean, our rights don't necessarily come from anywhere aside from our own analysis of
01:44:11.020
Oh, so then we don't really have any rights at all.
01:44:14.720
The rights that we have decided on based on the analysis of our human experience, we have
01:44:18.660
decided that these are the rights that prioritize the health and well-being of society.
01:44:22.760
And these are the things that we need to protect in order to prioritize the health and well-being
01:44:27.360
So you're saying that my rights are just whatever I say my rights are?
01:44:32.380
Our rights are what our society has decided on, on a large spectrum.
01:44:37.600
Well, then our society, on a large spectrum, has just decided that abortion is not a right.
01:44:44.620
And in about half the country now, abortion is severely restricted, if not outright illegal.
01:44:52.320
So again, 61% of Americans, which is the majority...
01:44:54.960
No, I'm talking about the Supreme Court and the legislatures.
01:44:59.300
Our government is not conducted by Pew Research.
01:45:03.820
When I talk about society, when I talk about society, I talk about both society as a general
01:45:10.000
sense, and then society as also the experts as it pertains to that right in particular.
01:45:16.380
So when we talk about 61% of Americans, according to the Pew Research Center, agree with the ability
01:45:24.300
to access abortion in all or most cases, and 95% of OBGYNs said regardless of their personal
01:45:29.600
feelings, they would help a patient access abortion.
01:45:32.460
So that is what I mean by coming to a consensus as a society about what is a right that should
01:45:38.600
And both society as a whole and the society or the group of experts largely as a whole
01:45:45.580
has decided that this is a right that should be protected.
01:45:48.860
But I think you're ignoring the way that our society is actually governed.
01:45:53.280
The civil authority in our society has decided that there is no right to abortion.
01:45:58.100
The Supreme Court just decided that, which is in keeping with the longer jurisprudence throughout
01:46:02.160
the United States and England and elsewhere in civilization.
01:46:04.980
And so that was how the actual civil authority in our society that governs us determined we
01:46:13.280
And so then I would say if that's your understanding of where rights come from, you should accept
01:46:18.680
But then you respond to that and say, no, that's actually, that doesn't matter what the civil
01:46:22.800
authority says through our self-government because of this one Pew Research Survey and because
01:46:28.220
of the trade organization for the obstetricians.
01:46:35.180
As I've said, pregnancy is a medical condition and abortion is a medical procedure.
01:46:40.460
And so when I talk about the experts and when I talk about people who should be deciding
01:46:46.980
It comes from society as a whole in addition to the experts.
01:46:49.700
And society as a whole is typically guided by experts.
01:46:52.280
But society as a whole, well, what represents society as a whole?
01:46:59.180
No, because the government is meant to serve society.
01:47:02.780
And if society decides that something should be protected as a majority.
01:47:07.360
And in self-government, the representatives pass new laws and appoint different judges.
01:47:10.760
And the judges make rulings about statutory and constitutional interpretation.
01:47:15.520
And in this case, they've said there's no right to abortion.
01:47:17.700
But as I've said, the legislation is not appropriately representing the needs and desires of the people.
01:47:24.820
Because 61% of Americans believe that abortion should be protected.
01:47:28.060
Oh, so you're saying that the way that the people in our self-government express their
01:47:34.600
Not through our elected representatives at the ballot box on Election Day, but through
01:47:44.620
But we have abysmal voter turnout here in the U.S.
01:47:48.160
And so what is represented in our legislation isn't necessarily representing the desires
01:47:57.540
So I don't think that our rights come primarily from just what we all sort of agree upon.
01:48:03.760
But even if I did, you realize how absurd this sounds.
01:48:08.240
You're saying that our system of self-government, where we go to the polls and we elect our representatives,
01:48:13.120
they're there to represent us, imperfectly as a fallen world might do, but that's what
01:48:20.120
You're saying that that is not the way to understand the will of the people.
01:48:27.480
But just like one survey of, who knows, usually these are 1,000 to 2,000 people, that is the
01:48:34.420
expression of the will of the people, even when other surveys contradict it.
01:48:39.120
If you're saying our rights come not from the civil authority, but from the Pew Research
01:48:44.040
No, it is very clear, as of recently, that our representatives are not properly representing
01:48:53.560
And like I said, we have abysmal voter turnout.
01:49:05.220
Well, I think the Senate is the Democrats, our presidency is a Democrat, and then I believe
01:49:12.880
the House went to the Republicans, or it hasn't been called yet, I haven't.
01:49:16.880
Well, the Republicans will take the House in January, when they're sworn into office.
01:49:22.000
But today, we have a unified government run by the Democrats.
01:49:25.300
And so when you say that our government is not adequately representing the people, I agree
01:49:29.260
But we also have a filibuster, which is essentially kneecapping our ability to pass proper legislation
01:49:39.960
But the representatives of the people agreed to have the filibuster in the first place.
01:49:47.640
I'm just saying the filibuster itself was an expression of the popular will and the self-guided.
01:49:51.360
But it's not right now, and it should be abolished, according to...
01:49:53.860
Well, they can abolish it if they want to, but it just hasn't been done yet by either party.
01:50:00.380
Sure, you might disagree with it, but the politicians do not abolish it because, presumably, they
01:50:05.560
believe it's in their electoral interest not to abolish it because they are accountable
01:50:10.020
And so, regardless of what you think about the filibuster, nevertheless, if you accept the
01:50:14.340
premise of self-government, Republican government at all, that expresses the will of the people.
01:50:19.200
Well, also, we live right now in a binary political system in the United States, which our political
01:50:25.020
spectrum as a whole of society doesn't exist in a binary.
01:50:30.260
And so, when we only have one of two options, it's not going to accurately represent the desires
01:50:35.940
of the people, which is a big problem in our political system.
01:50:48.240
I don't agree with all the Democrats do, but I believe it was Obama who said that voting
01:50:57.280
You aren't going to find the one, but you take the one that is getting you closest to
01:51:02.420
And for me, that is the Democrats in our binary system.
01:51:10.080
You know, I find myself, I don't know, maybe I'm going crazy in my old age, but I find myself
01:51:15.100
agreeing with the radical feminists more and more than I do with the leftists.
01:51:19.560
Or I'm sorry, more and more than I do with the liberals.
01:51:22.640
Well, there was a great clip that was going around of Catherine McKinnon.
01:51:27.420
Catherine McKinnon, wonderful, great radical feminist.
01:51:30.500
And it was her debating some conservative over porn.
01:51:36.900
She said, you know, you conservatives, some of you conservatives are tolerant of porn.
01:51:43.500
And obviously, since the internet, it's exploded everywhere and it's caused a lot of problems.
01:51:47.520
And she says, but, you know, imagine if you were in your apartment and you heard some guy
01:51:51.540
knocking a woman around, every single wall, abusing some woman.
01:51:56.760
I hope you'd go over to the apartment, try to stop it.
01:51:59.920
But that's what you're doing when you're watching porn.
01:52:02.300
And this weak conservative, he said, well, you know, but people have a right to look at
01:52:10.760
And the conservative said to her, well, well, don't you agree with that?
01:52:15.240
All these free principles of just watching whatever you want.
01:52:22.200
I thought, oh, I guess maybe I'm a feminist too.
01:52:26.680
Or would you describe yourself as, she called herself sex negative.
01:52:31.040
You know, that's the kind of anti-porn feminists.
01:52:33.000
Are you the anti-porn feminist or the pro-porn feminist?
01:52:35.220
Yeah, because largely our, the pornographic industry is a huge issue as far as perpetuating
01:52:46.440
And so, no, yeah, I'm not a supporter of the porn industry as a whole.
01:52:52.700
Yeah, and as far as like sexual liberation and the ability to, you know, consciously
01:52:57.400
and responsibly consume porn, I'm not necessarily opposed to that.
01:53:01.760
But the large porn industry as a whole, as it supports sex trafficking and is largely unregulated,
01:53:09.400
And is it only the trafficking that bothers you or is it?
01:53:13.200
The women who are involved in porn come from bad backgrounds almost all the time and usually
01:53:18.960
neglectful and abusive backgrounds and they're very vulnerable.
01:53:22.700
And they're completely exploited and they're paid pennies and they're treated literally
01:53:32.120
And it's not, that's not a matter of trafficking exactly, but it's still an exploitation.
01:53:38.280
But then you, then you just said that you don't mind people watching porn in certain circumstances.
01:53:43.860
If, if the industry was better regulated, people were paid living wages, there wasn't this
01:53:48.640
whole situation where people feel, you know, pressured or forced into that industry based
01:53:53.260
off of certain life experiences or certain, certain circumstances.
01:53:59.880
I do feel like people can consensually and responsibly, you know, participate.
01:54:08.700
Like, I see, and I think that that is sort of dehumanizing and I think that-
01:54:12.980
But that's also removing the consent aspect because there are a lot of people who do do
01:54:17.460
sex work responsibly and they do so of their own volition.
01:54:21.160
So you, so before you were sounding sex negative, like the radical feminists, now you're sounding
01:54:29.300
Well, I am sex positive, but I mean, it depends.
01:54:34.000
I mean, we agree that we both do not like the porn industry as a whole.
01:54:43.160
I mean, frankly, according to the law, it already sort of is largely banned.
01:54:46.680
It's just a few court decisions kind of screwed that up.
01:54:49.840
I mean, I think that things like OnlyFans should stay legal when they are run.
01:54:54.600
I think that if it is run by the worker themselves and it is they're deciding to do something of
01:54:59.760
their own volition, then I'm not necessarily opposed to that.
01:55:02.420
But I do think that the porn industry should be banned or regulated as a, you know, as a
01:55:09.040
So people should not be permitted to look at Pornhub, for instance.
01:55:13.520
I think Pornhub should be shut down because a lot of it is, you know, unregulated and kind
01:55:18.500
of, there's a lot of things on there too that perpetuate abuse, that perpetuate, you
01:55:23.520
know, radicalist ideas of, you know, objectifying women.
01:55:30.060
So does that not undercut a little bit of your argument about bodily autonomy and doing
01:55:35.680
what you want, you know, in your own bedroom with the blinds closed?
01:55:39.620
I mean, if a guy wants to go into his bedroom and pull up some disgusting pornography and
01:55:46.100
do whatever with his own body, you know, sex with someone you love as Woody Allen described
01:55:50.780
it, is that not a matter of his personal bodily autonomy that he allegedly has a right to?
01:56:02.980
There are responsible and worker-run, you know.
01:56:09.920
Well, we don't have to protect his right to access Pornhub.
01:56:18.160
I think OnlyFans is okay because, like I said, it is run by the workers themselves and
01:56:22.120
they aren't exploited by an industry and they aren't forced into certain things.
01:56:25.700
Don't you think that pornography intrinsically is exploitative and degrading?
01:56:37.460
Because you seem to think that the only moral criterion that matters is consent.
01:56:42.940
If you consent to do it, then it's fine and dandy.
01:56:45.480
But I think there are plenty of things that you can consent to do that are not good and
01:56:50.320
are degrading and feed your basest passions and enslave you and should be illegal and are
01:57:04.640
But I don't think you have a right to do all sorts of things, you know?
01:57:07.700
I don't think people should have a right to cheat on their wives.
01:57:09.760
Maybe a married man consents to sleep with his secretary or something, and the secretary
01:57:17.700
And it was illegal for a lot of American history.
01:57:21.060
I don't think that if you are under the delusion, if you're a man and you're under the delusion
01:57:26.000
that you're a woman, that you have a right to chop your healthy genitals off any more
01:57:29.800
than you would have a right to walk into a doctor's office and say, Doc, I identify as
01:57:39.680
You know, I'm not going to chop your limbs off.
01:57:41.720
But then that same man walks into a doctor's office.
01:57:45.380
And that doc says, wow, oh my gosh, that's so brave and wonderful.
01:57:50.780
Let's get you onto the operating table and cut off the family jewels.
01:57:56.560
I guess, ultimately, I'm saying, I don't think you have a right to wrong.
01:58:01.480
Well, what we define as wrong is different between you and I.
01:58:05.760
Because I do agree in providing gender-affirming care to people.
01:58:10.520
Because when you are in a body that doesn't feel right to you and you do not identify as
01:58:16.060
the gender that people perceive you as, that can have psychological consequences.
01:58:20.560
And again, when we look at medical experts who study this and provide this care, they
01:58:25.220
agree that gender-affirming care is essential in order to prioritize the needs of these patients.
01:58:33.440
So Dr. Paul McHugh is a doctor at Johns Hopkins and was the pioneer of the gender transition
01:58:40.500
surgery and was the head of their gender clinic.
01:58:45.700
Then he found after a few years that it wasn't improving psychological outcomes.
01:58:50.160
He didn't find that it was damaging psychological outcomes in most cases, but it just wasn't
01:58:59.480
And so he's not only one figure in the transgender care medical community, whatever.
01:59:08.260
And he says that it's awful and we should stop the surgeries.
01:59:10.920
So does his expert opinion color your views at all?
01:59:15.300
So in medicine, we are taught something called paternalism is something that we should avoid.
01:59:20.180
And paternalism is essentially putting your own personal views into the health care of other
01:59:25.180
So if you believe that a patient is going to regret this decision, then you are going
01:59:33.040
And as medical practitioners, as physicians, we are taught to avoid paternalism.
01:59:40.800
So that's an interesting use of the word paternalism.
01:59:42.940
So by that, you mean just having opinions and acting on them?
01:59:48.700
It is a specific terminology in medical ethics.
01:59:51.420
It is not prohibiting your patient's access to medical care based off of—
01:59:57.140
You would say, I don't think you should chop your genitals off, or I don't think you should
01:59:59.880
See, and that is putting your personal opinion that is unrelated to medical studies and unrelated
02:00:08.400
Why would you hold a personal opinion that is completely out of step with reality?
02:00:13.800
I mean, I just fail to understand this distinction between a personal opinion and, say, a public
02:00:21.860
I just don't see—if they disagree, the professional opinion that you're supposed to hold and your
02:00:28.940
personal opinion, and if they're contradictory, only one of them can be true.
02:00:33.620
So if the professional opinion is true, then why do you hold your mistaken personal opinion?
02:00:40.100
And if your personal opinion is true, then why would you give a damn what some lunatic
02:00:44.240
who's telling you to perform a lobotomy has to say?
02:00:47.120
So when it comes to medical practice, your personal opinion is colored by your own personal
02:00:53.780
experience, where your professional opinion is influenced by evidence and training.
02:00:59.000
But is your personal opinion not influenced by your faculties of reason and your moral
02:01:03.300
conscience and your ability to perceive reality?
02:01:05.680
True, but my moral conscience and my ability to perceive reality is based off of my own
02:01:10.460
personal reality, and my personal reality differs from someone else's.
02:01:15.500
I thought—I thought the purpose of reason and perception is to ascertain objective reality.
02:01:23.740
It's not like the imagination, where you're just concocting your own fantasies, right?
02:01:27.800
So what you're telling me, then, is that your faculties of reason and moral conscience are
02:01:32.000
not reliable, and they can have nothing to say about objective reality, so then I have
02:01:36.700
to ask, why should I care what you think about anything?
02:01:40.240
Well, it depends on what you're asking me my opinion on.
02:01:42.820
Because, again, there's a difference between personal and professional opinions.
02:01:45.680
Because when professional opinions, especially in medical practice, are colored by statistics
02:01:51.020
and training, that is going to supersede my personal opinion when it comes to offering someone
02:01:57.640
So are you saying you simultaneously hold two opinions at the same time, or are you saying
02:02:02.600
that you just defer to the board of obstetricians on every question?
02:02:09.680
I'm saying that I understand, as a medical professional, that I need to avoid paternalism.
02:02:14.620
And that although my personal opinion, and my personal experience, and my perception of
02:02:21.060
life based off of my own worldview isn't going to be completely accurate when it comes to
02:02:28.080
the life experience of a patient sitting in my exam room.
02:02:31.540
So what if it's 1950, you've just graduated medical school, you're doing your residency,
02:02:37.960
and the fancy people in the lab coats say, all right, Bronte, here's your first assignment,
02:02:44.000
you're going to perform a lobotomy on this crazy lady.
02:02:46.940
And the crazy lady comes in, and you say, you know, I think it's probably a bad idea to
02:02:51.580
I think scrambling up poor women's brains is not good.
02:02:55.840
But the consensus medical opinion, the professional opinion, disagrees with my personal opinion
02:03:01.720
Would you just put your personal opinion and your own view from your reason and your conscience
02:03:07.700
So does the woman, is she wanting this procedure?
02:03:17.120
I mean, with any kind of psychological treatment, there is a lot of ambiguity.
02:03:24.460
So in this situation, we have the privilege of, you know, perspective, right?
02:03:29.500
We, in the 1950s, you don't have the privilege of that kind of perspective.
02:03:33.360
So we understand that, you know, medically, lobotomies are not appropriate.
02:03:38.600
But in the 50s, we are working with the evidence that we have at the time.
02:03:42.880
And if the patient is wanting the procedure, and the evidence and studies at the time support
02:03:48.040
that procedure, then sure, you would move forward.
02:03:50.120
You would perform the lobotomy, even if your faculties have...
02:03:54.760
Just as abortion and transgender surgery are controversial now.
02:03:58.960
Because it's not only that we learned in foresight, you know, or rather in retrospectively.
02:04:04.020
Oh, gosh, can you imagine we did these lobotomies?
02:04:07.900
And then all of a sudden, we all realized it was wrong.
02:04:15.040
So I think the analogy is quite apt to abortion and to transgenderism.
02:04:21.760
Well, let's just go to the lobotomy thing then.
02:04:23.460
You know, at the time, as did many, many people in the medical profession, that lobotomies
02:04:28.420
are really spooky and weird and not good, and you really disagree with it.
02:04:35.480
The docs are telling you to perform the lobotomy.
02:04:38.360
Do you really put your own moral conscience aside and your own rational thought aside,
02:04:42.840
and you just do what the doctors tell you to do?
02:04:48.140
And I also don't believe that lobotomies are, you know, analogous to gender-affirming care.
02:04:55.520
Because gender-affirming care is not necessarily controversial in the medical field.
02:05:01.600
Well, the guy who invented it says that it's terrible.
02:05:03.560
No, as you said, it might not have improved their mental state, but it also didn't necessarily
02:05:17.880
It's convenient that you choose this one person who campaigns against it.
02:05:22.760
Well, he might have been one of the first to do it.
02:05:24.460
But in the medical field, it is shown that providing gender-affirming care is beneficial
02:05:30.040
to the patients when done with evidence-based medicine and appropriately.
02:05:34.100
In the medical field, it was shown that lobotomies were really good for crazy ladies.
02:05:38.240
And it was shown with evidence and studies and papers and very serious men in horn-rimmed glasses
02:05:44.200
See, and I just feel like this line of questioning is inherently transphobic.
02:05:49.260
And when you act as though people who have gender dysphoria or body dysmorphia or whatever
02:05:54.940
it may be, when you act as though their situation is equivalent to someone in the 50s needing
02:06:01.260
or wanting a lobotomy, you are perpetuating this idea that their life experience and their
02:06:07.880
opinions about their own bodies is inappropriate and wrong.
02:06:11.120
Bronte, I just think your attacks on lobotomies are extraordinarily misogynistic, first of
02:06:16.580
And I think they deny the science and the scientific consensus.
02:06:19.860
And they're frankly ignorant because all of the educated people with all the power, they
02:06:31.320
Hysteria, actually, is what we would have called it then.
02:06:34.120
And you're denying them care that will ease their suffering.
02:06:41.100
If the patient is consenting to this procedure and the evidence and the consensus of the medical
02:06:48.540
field as a whole is supporting this kind of procedure, then I would go forward with it.
02:06:55.940
I'm not going to say that I would perform the lobotomy.
02:07:02.260
I would perform a procedure if the evidence supported it and the patient consented to it.
02:07:08.480
And in the 1950s, the evidence supported lobotomies.
02:07:12.120
I don't know enough about lobotomies in the 50s in order to give you an accurate response
02:07:16.820
So it seems to me that your deferral away from moral conscience, your admission that your
02:07:28.200
moral conscience and your faculties of reason are purely subjective, solipsistic even, they
02:07:33.020
only pertain to your own body and your own possibly deluded view of the world.
02:07:37.500
And so that's why you have to defer to the experts and the people in the lab coats.
02:07:44.420
And those people are the ones who have the ability to make our rights anyway.
02:07:48.740
Our rights, in fact, come from the Academy of Obstetricians or whatever.
02:07:52.480
And because of all of that, if the medical science supported it and if the patient consented
02:07:59.880
You would perform the gender-affirming surgery on the men who think that they're women.
02:08:07.660
I just say humbly and respectfully, Bronte, it should give you pause if you're on the
02:08:15.000
I am on the side of gender-affirming care and reproductive health care.
02:08:20.820
Not necessarily lobotomies, no, because those aren't analogous to gender-affirming care.
02:08:24.980
If you want to, because it seems like you are intent to use manipulative and emotional
02:08:31.560
Because if you need to refer to lobotomies in order to make your point, then that means—
02:08:37.320
My point is that the scientists often get things dramatically, including in the medical
02:08:41.320
We should be able to have a conversation about gender-affirming care and abortion without
02:08:46.120
bringing in a controversial procedure from the 50s.
02:08:52.180
No, if you're not able to just discuss gender-affirming care and just discuss abortion without bringing
02:08:58.220
in, you know, manipulative language and outdated procedures, then you're not able to appropriately
02:09:05.440
Because your defense of, well, now transgenderism but also abortion is based on the authority
02:09:11.600
of the—and the credibility of the medical authorities.
02:09:15.260
And so I have to demonstrate to you that those medical authorities don't have all that
02:09:21.560
much credibility, especially on sort of bizarre and controversial matters, because historically
02:09:28.400
And that's why I'm going into the not-too-distant past, by the way.
02:09:30.580
It's not like I'm going back to leeches and bleedings and all sorts of bizarre medical
02:09:36.320
practices that were accepted by the experts for all of human history.
02:09:39.300
I'm going back to a very, very recent example and showing you that those experts in the lab
02:09:44.000
coats that you are deferring to, even for the question of rights itself, are very frequently
02:09:50.420
But in this case, we have shown that gender-affirming care is beneficial to patients who have gender
02:10:00.000
Currently, with the evidence that we have right now, we are showing that it is medically
02:10:04.860
responsible to provide patients with all the information and all of the access to health
02:10:09.980
care that can benefit them in their medical care.
02:10:15.160
Is it not discussing people who exist in a body that they don't feel comfortable in?
02:10:19.620
And modern medicine has the ability to help them address that issue.
02:10:23.880
Bronte, when you say exist in a body, or you say they find themselves in a body, who do
02:10:35.220
Our fellow citizens that we share this society with.
02:10:39.540
You're saying that they are distinct from their body.
02:11:05.000
I think that the soul is a substantial form of the body.
02:11:09.320
But then that means that the soul and the body are linked.
02:11:15.080
If you agree, as we just said, that the body is actually a symbol of the soul, then you
02:11:21.680
The body is not something merely to be discarded.
02:11:25.080
To say, I have a body, is an incoherent statement, according to what you've just agreed to.
02:11:30.000
Because you would say, I am a body, and I am a soul, and I'm this...
02:11:33.600
The technical term for it is hylomorphic being, that is, body and soul, inextricably linked
02:11:40.580
Right, but that doesn't mean that my mentality and my soul is accurately represented by the
02:11:48.620
So if you find a discrepancy between your metaphysical perception of yourself and the
02:11:52.340
physical representation, which you acknowledge is tied inextricably to your soul, why do you
02:12:00.280
Wouldn't it be a little easier just to change your mind and recognize that your perception
02:12:05.560
If you're a woman, I think, you're very clearly a woman, and if you said one day, I'm a man,
02:12:12.480
well, rather than my saying, oh, well, good, go chop your body up, shouldn't I just say,
02:12:15.600
no, you're not, you're a woman, and you're just misperceiving yourself, or misconceiving
02:12:23.960
Well, then you would be denying what I am telling you is my life experience.
02:12:30.500
According to you, but you can't tell someone that their life experience is wrong.
02:12:35.340
No, I can tell people that their statements about reality are wrong.
02:12:42.400
Why do you think that we are men and women, and there is no spectrum in between?
02:12:57.420
Well, I haven't, you know, I'm a married man, so I don't have too much.
02:13:01.960
What would, in abstract, what would you quantify sex to you?
02:13:07.820
Well, it would be, it would involve your bodily features.
02:13:18.780
It would involve, it would mean that you're not a man.
02:13:23.020
It would mean that you're complementary to a man and not identical with a man.
02:13:27.420
So are you aware that, medically, your genitalia, your hormones, and your chromosomes do not
02:13:36.880
There are multiple medical conditions in which your chromosomes, your hormones, and your
02:13:41.240
genitalia do not match and do not fit into this binary.
02:13:46.820
Right, and so what I'm saying is, naturally, sex is on a spectrum.
02:14:02.420
But if we say that there are some ligers, not very many, but there are some ligers, this
02:14:07.380
would not deny that there is a categorical distinction between lions and tigers.
02:14:12.920
And the same thing would be true, you mentioned a chromosomal abnormality.
02:14:17.680
Turner syndrome is where you have one X chromosome, right?
02:14:22.540
Well, why don't we talk about Klinefelter then?
02:14:25.220
Because that's when you have, I think, two Xs and a Y.
02:14:28.700
I mean, you could talk about any of these chromosomal or genital abnormalities.
02:14:35.440
But in that expression, it's pretty easy to categorize.
02:14:40.040
I mean, I mentioned Turner syndrome because it's so easy to categorize people who have
02:14:46.280
But in the others, too, even when there's more ambiguity, you can categorize these things.
02:14:51.060
And so then we talk about this distinction between sex and gender.
02:14:56.000
And people say, well, sex and gender are different.
02:14:58.100
So you might be a woman, but your gender, by which people really, I think, mean your soul,
02:15:02.080
I think you're using the more precise language there.
02:15:04.760
Your soul might be the soul of a man, say, or something like that.
02:15:07.800
But I just don't see how that would be true if your soul and body really are linked.
02:15:12.140
And also, if it were true, then why is it that we would say that you then have a right
02:15:17.620
Wouldn't we then say you have an obligation to express your gender in accordance with your
02:15:31.580
Porn and drugs is not the same as gender-affirming care.
02:15:41.040
Like, porn and drugs obviously have—like, that is a negative industry.
02:15:45.860
But when you compare them to something like gender-affirming care, you are coloring gender-affirming
02:15:51.040
I'm just saying that the sex surgeries where you chop off the boy's, you know, family jewels,
02:15:58.600
See, and where I stand on it is I think that acceptance and tolerance and respect for people
02:16:05.540
who are different from you is inherent in being a compassionate, moral being.
02:16:10.740
And I don't believe that I get to tell someone that they are wrong based off of my interpretation
02:16:18.320
So to get us back, I think, to the top, I sincerely believe that abortion is evil because it is,
02:16:27.460
as you describe, ending the life of a human being.
02:16:34.380
And I sincerely believe that abortion should be illegal throughout the United States.
02:16:39.540
And I really would just request that you not impose your liberal beliefs on me and force
02:16:45.700
me to surrender my political views in a self-government, for goodness sakes, and force me to live in
02:16:52.960
a society where women are permitted to kill their children.
02:16:56.260
I would just ask you to respect and include and be welcoming and tolerant of my views and
02:17:03.020
identity, my identity as the correct person in this debate.
02:17:05.520
So I respect your opinion as it pertains to your body and your life.
02:17:09.160
That is the entire point of being pro-choice, is I am not saying that you or your wife or
02:17:19.980
And being pro-choice means that I respect everyone's ability to decide what is best
02:17:33.960
And whether physically, financially, or mentally, they are incapable or unwilling to endure pregnancy
02:17:39.840
And I hope every pregnant person who's watching this can try to understand if they had to endure
02:17:44.920
that, unwanted and unsupported, how terrifying and traumatizing that would be.
02:17:53.380
And I just want to say that I consistently center the pregnant person.
02:17:59.340
I respect women and their ability and their knowledge about their own body and their own
02:18:04.000
And I want to protect their right to access health care.
02:18:07.080
What if they believe that their baby is not a, that the fetus is not a human being?
02:18:13.860
I mean, well, that would be medically inaccurate.
02:18:18.780
I mean, I respect their belief, but it doesn't make it correct.
02:18:25.800
I mean, if it doesn't impose on my ability to access health care and it doesn't reflect
02:18:29.640
my life individually, then they can think whatever they want.
02:18:40.920
I mean, I don't understand what you mean by that.
02:18:44.640
Well, you're saying you respect these views that are wrong.
02:18:50.380
So the government that we get, at least in theory, is going to reflect what people believe.
02:18:54.940
And so what you keep coming back to in these questions of transgenderism and in questions
02:19:00.900
of people mistakenly believing that the human in their body is not a human being, you keep
02:19:05.280
saying, well, I just respect your wrong, you're entitled to your wrong beliefs.
02:19:08.020
But, you know, those wrong beliefs in a self-government end up becoming law.
02:19:10.960
But they must be evidence-based and medically accurate and medically appropriate.
02:19:16.040
Oh, so you only respect the beliefs if they're medically accurate.
02:19:18.680
But you just said you respected the woman's belief even though it wasn't accurate.
02:19:23.920
She can have that belief if she chooses to have that belief.
02:19:26.380
As long as there's no consequence of it in society.
02:19:31.580
Like, your ideas that you're pushing on your show do have dire consequences for pregnant
02:19:35.920
people, as the University of Colorado showed, banning abortion can increase maternal mortality
02:19:41.620
And so pushing these medically inaccurate and emotionally manipulative views on your show
02:19:46.620
and many others, they do have impacts on living, breathing people.
02:19:51.060
And they will lead to more harm and more suffering of people's mothers, daughters, sisters, of women
02:19:57.840
Well, you know, because I'm a gentleman, I obviously disagree with everything you just said.
02:20:01.920
But since I'm a gentleman, I'll give you the last word, Bronte.
02:20:08.680
I am firmly opposed to abortion and the transgender surgeries and the mutilation and to lobotomies.
02:20:18.540
And I guess my critics and opponents support those things.
02:20:22.980
And people can decide for themselves who is more reasonable.
02:20:25.520
I am sincerely really impressed with you that you came out here and were willing to come on
02:20:32.380
And I really, I wish more, well, I won't call you a liberal because you're a leftist.