The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - November 06, 2025


Another Conservative MP resigns! Liberals block Conservative budget amendment


Episode Stats


Length

16 minutes

Words per minute

183.68471

Word count

3,003

Sentence count

13

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Matt Genereau resigns from the Conservative Party of Canada and becomes an independent. What does this mean for the Tories? Is this a good or bad thing for the party? And what does it mean for Canadian politics in general?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here.
00:00:03.040 Imagine me sitting here thinking I was about to do the show
00:00:06.660 talking about the Liberals, NDP, and Bloc Québécois
00:00:10.540 ganging up to defeat the Conservative amendment to the Liberal budget
00:00:14.800 and then we had another Conservative MP leave the Conservative Party
00:00:19.760 and now we have to talk about this instead
00:00:21.840 although we will be talking about the former topic a little bit later in this video as well.
00:00:26.600 So Conservative MP for the riding of Edmonton Riverbend, Matt Gennereau
00:00:32.900 is leaving the Conservative Party.
00:00:35.500 Now he's not actually crossing the floor and joining the Liberals
00:00:38.980 and he's not even leaving the party and just sitting as an independent
00:00:43.080 he's just leaving Parliament.
00:00:45.080 He is resigning his seat sometime near in the future
00:00:48.440 and then there will be a new by-election to replace him in the riding of Edmonton Riverbend.
00:00:54.120 In a certain sense, I actually don't see this as being an entirely bad thing for the Conservative Party.
00:01:01.060 You know, it's an easy way of getting fresh blood in in a by-election
00:01:04.920 as well as Pierre Polyev being able to test his mettle in an Alberta riding
00:01:10.060 to show that he is still popular as the leader.
00:01:13.420 I know he kind of did that in Battle River Crowfoot
00:01:16.040 but now he can show that even when he is not on the ballot in a suburban riding
00:01:20.740 that Conservative voters will show up and put people over the finish line
00:01:25.060 for this version of Pierre Polyev's Conservative Party.
00:01:29.180 But before we get into it a little further
00:01:31.320 I just want to remind you guys that
00:01:33.520 hey, if you like the show
00:01:35.100 make sure to leave a like on this video
00:01:36.960 subscribe to the channel if you are not yet a subscriber
00:01:39.580 and hit the notification bell
00:01:41.080 and leave a comment on what you think about all this
00:01:44.580 but let's go over to the letter that Matt Gennaro had released himself
00:01:49.580 to get his perspective on it
00:01:51.860 although I will admit many of these things that politicians release
00:01:55.460 tend to be deliberately vague
00:01:57.960 because they're never really going to tell you all of their motivations for doing things.
00:02:01.800 Abigail Bimham from the I think CTV News The National
00:02:06.820 has put out this letter that Matt Gennaro released
00:02:12.920 and it says
00:02:14.300 For those who have reached out
00:02:16.140 I am deeply grateful for your friendship and concern
00:02:18.960 however I ask that you please not attempt to contact my family during this time
00:02:23.580 I ran in the last election hopeful that Canadians
00:02:26.520 would put their faith in a team led by Pierre Polyev's Conservatives
00:02:30.240 offering a chance to change Canada's perception
00:02:32.800 in our own country and around the world
00:02:35.080 I wanted desperately to play a role in that vision
00:02:39.080 although the outcome was not what I anticipated
00:02:41.740 I have great admiration for the many remarkable individuals
00:02:45.500 who were elected in the House of Commons
00:02:47.200 on both sides of the aisle
00:02:48.800 who continue to dedicate themselves to the betterment of our nation
00:02:52.140 their work gives me faith that the momentum towards the stronger and more unified Canada endures
00:02:57.860 with all this in mind earlier today
00:03:00.200 I spoke with our opposition whip
00:03:02.000 a colleague and friend
00:03:03.400 for whom I have the utmost respect
00:03:05.060 to inform him of my decision to resign as a member of parliament
00:03:08.820 it is not an easy decision
00:03:10.600 but it is better
00:03:11.560 but it is I believe the right one
00:03:14.300 I have
00:03:15.400 I have hoped to have the opportunity to address the House one final time
00:03:18.820 in the future
00:03:19.640 for now my focus must
00:03:21.240 turn entirely to my family
00:03:23.040 and to the responsibilities that come with that
00:03:25.680 and then it is just signed
00:03:26.620 Matt Genereau
00:03:27.740 and that is it here
00:03:29.880 again this is not honestly the worst thing ever
00:03:33.040 this doesn't actually really affect anything in favor of the liberals
00:03:37.080 does it make it a little bit easier for them to pass things right now
00:03:40.300 sure
00:03:41.140 technically now they only need
00:03:43.480 if Matt Genereau just doesn't even participate in the vote on the budget
00:03:48.200 and just resigns before that
00:03:49.480 or just starts being completely MIA from parliament
00:03:51.880 technically now Mark Carney's liberals could just pass the budget
00:03:55.740 with only Elizabeth May's vote
00:03:58.280 in order to do it
00:03:59.480 they would just need her vote 0.96
00:04:00.820 and then the speaker would break the tie
00:04:02.860 in favor of passing the budget
00:04:05.520 that would seem very shallow
00:04:07.880 but it's actually very possible right now
00:04:10.540 and it would give Elizabeth May the most relevance she's ever had
00:04:14.240 but again this isn't like a floor crossing
00:04:16.860 it's not permanent
00:04:17.780 within six months
00:04:18.760 there must be a by-election called
00:04:21.340 in order to replace Matt Genereau
00:04:23.800 in his Edmonton River Bend seat
00:04:26.020 you know they could pick me maybe
00:04:28.020 I'm kind of kidding
00:04:29.280 when I say kind of kidding
00:04:30.780 you always have to hedge your bets
00:04:31.700 maybe someone does ask
00:04:33.000 hey Wyatt do you want a riding nowhere near where you live
00:04:35.460 but anyways now I'm going to fully stop joking here
00:04:38.820 but this actually again
00:04:40.980 does allow Pierre Polyev and the conservatives
00:04:43.160 to demonstrate that they're not just being able to tread water
00:04:47.220 from where they were at back in April
00:04:49.520 and win the seat back
00:04:50.740 but in a by-election
00:04:52.020 that they could win the seat
00:04:53.440 with 60% of the vote or more
00:04:55.720 because this is one of those Edmonton ridings
00:04:58.400 that in theory the liberals could win
00:05:01.800 and when I say in theory
00:05:03.200 I mean it's just not like a Calgary riding
00:05:05.340 where the conservatives win it by like 20 plus points
00:05:07.780 this is a riding where the conservatives win by about 10 points
00:05:11.560 and so if the conservatives run this by-election
00:05:15.020 and end up having a margin of 15 or 20%
00:05:19.040 it would probably show that the conservative vote
00:05:21.640 is coming back towards the conservative party
00:05:24.300 those voters that they hemorrhaged towards the liberals
00:05:26.680 in the last election
00:05:28.000 are willing to come back to the conservative party
00:05:31.220 and you could say like
00:05:32.700 well how did the conservatives lose conservative voters
00:05:37.740 they actually gained percentage of the vote
00:05:39.780 in this last election
00:05:40.940 well yes
00:05:41.840 but while they gained votes
00:05:44.220 they also lost votes
00:05:45.420 there's pretty much no election
00:05:46.820 where a party just comes in with 100%
00:05:49.600 of what they had last time
00:05:50.780 plus some more
00:05:51.820 usually what happens is you lose a little bit
00:05:54.040 but then you gain even more
00:05:55.600 and what the conservatives did
00:05:56.780 was they actually probably gained a lot of younger voters
00:05:59.540 who may have presumably been voting NDP or liberal
00:06:02.620 and they especially got a lot of former NDP
00:06:06.300 sort of trade union blue collar guys
00:06:09.400 in ridings like Windsor
00:06:11.000 which is why the conservatives went from being a third place party in Windsor
00:06:14.620 that hadn't won
00:06:17.460 especially one of the ridings
00:06:19.020 they hadn't won one of the ridings
00:06:20.220 since like the 1930s
00:06:21.620 to being you know
00:06:23.020 to winning it
00:06:23.660 they were third place before
00:06:24.960 and then they actually won it
00:06:26.480 on the strength of winning youth votes
00:06:28.960 of winning immigrant votes
00:06:30.420 as well as the key demographic
00:06:32.720 of blue collar workers
00:06:34.500 who used to vote NDP
00:06:35.920 but now we can go a little bit more into the budget
00:06:39.920 because this situation
00:06:41.700 isn't actually that big of a deal
00:06:44.300 it's annoying
00:06:45.340 but it's something that will solve itself in time
00:06:47.760 and may even give the conservatives
00:06:49.760 the ability to flex their strength
00:06:51.780 in a by-election
00:06:52.820 this is not like Chris Dantremont
00:06:55.240 who just left the conservatives
00:06:56.840 and joined the liberals
00:06:57.720 with extremely petty personal reasons for doing so
00:07:00.720 this seems like a complete black box
00:07:03.700 of a decision for Matt Gennaro
00:07:05.000 I have no clue why he's doing this
00:07:06.840 maybe he does just want to spend more time with his family
00:07:09.220 who knows
00:07:10.000 but he's not joining the liberal party
00:07:11.820 and helping them rule for another four years
00:07:14.300 with a majority government
00:07:15.760 but anyways
00:07:17.000 now let's move on to the budget issue
00:07:19.640 because we had the NDP and the bloc
00:07:22.900 do something really stupid
00:07:24.920 they could have abstained from this vote
00:07:27.100 you are allowed to abstain in the parliament
00:07:29.840 but they actually joined with the liberal government
00:07:33.040 to defeat a conservative amendment to the budget
00:07:36.440 something that is going to actually be very helpful
00:07:39.660 for the conservatives in the future
00:07:41.880 because they can say
00:07:42.900 we were the only ones
00:07:44.160 trying to reduce wasteful spending
00:07:45.940 we were the only ones
00:07:47.280 trying to eliminate bad regulations
00:07:49.120 we were the only ones
00:07:51.440 trying to give Canadians 0.94
00:07:52.800 more of their own money back
00:07:54.220 and reduce inflation
00:07:55.260 and they were given that
00:07:58.020 by the NDP and the bloc
00:08:00.040 not just not voting for the conservative amendment
00:08:02.400 but specifically voting against this
00:08:04.520 against it
00:08:05.580 we have here a national post story
00:08:08.400 that reads
00:08:09.060 block NDP to vote with liberals
00:08:11.960 in first of three confidence budget votes
00:08:14.960 so all of the amendments being put forward
00:08:18.000 as well as the budget itself
00:08:19.740 is a confidence motion
00:08:21.880 that you have to be
00:08:23.540 one I think only official parties
00:08:25.120 can bring these amendments forward
00:08:26.460 so you're going to have one
00:08:27.500 from the conservatives
00:08:28.560 that's going to get defeated today
00:08:29.940 and then you're probably going to have one
00:08:31.080 from the Bloc Québécois
00:08:32.080 remember NDP is not an official party
00:08:34.220 and then you will have the final confidence vote
00:08:37.180 which is just the liberals
00:08:38.540 passing what they proposed
00:08:40.260 but this article reads
00:08:42.400 Ottawa
00:08:43.220 Canadians are not headed to the polls just yet
00:08:46.140 the Bloc Québécois and the NDP
00:08:48.060 have said they will be voting with the liberals
00:08:50.240 ensuring a majority
00:08:51.540 in the first of three confidence votes
00:08:53.440 on Prime Minister Mark Carney's first budget
00:08:55.700 on Thursday evening
00:08:56.860 more specifically
00:08:58.000 they will be voting against
00:08:59.180 the conservative sub amendment
00:09:00.700 which calls on the House of Commons
00:09:02.300 to reject the budget
00:09:03.220 because it did not bring down the deficit
00:09:05.000 to the promised 42 billion
00:09:06.900 in the last financial update
00:09:08.360 and failed to include a plan
00:09:10.900 to build more oil and gas pipelines
00:09:13.520 interim NDP leader Don Davies
00:09:16.560 says his party will not be supporting
00:09:18.180 the conservative's motion
00:09:19.180 because it calls for tens of billions
00:09:21.240 of more in cuts to public spending
00:09:22.960 quote
00:09:23.940 it's absolutely irresponsible
00:09:26.320 it's extremely right-wing
00:09:27.940 and it's not the direction
00:09:29.380 the country should be going in 0.65
00:09:30.840 Don Davies said
00:09:31.740 the vote is expected to happen
00:09:33.340 around 5.45 p.m. Eastern time
00:09:35.480 there will be a second confidence vote
00:09:37.380 on Friday
00:09:37.940 on the Bloc's amendment to the budget
00:09:39.660 this time
00:09:40.240 which calls for MPs
00:09:41.380 to reject it
00:09:42.360 because it does not do enough
00:09:43.800 for Quebec
00:09:44.500 in the party's opinion
00:09:45.660 and it does not have a clear plan
00:09:48.200 to fight climate change
00:09:49.700 and then it just goes on from there
00:09:51.720 of the Bloc 0.81
00:09:52.380 having their own
00:09:53.340 completely opposite reasons
00:09:55.280 to the conservatives
00:09:56.100 for why the budget is bad
00:09:57.960 the funny thing here
00:09:59.600 is that Mark Carney
00:10:00.880 has put himself
00:10:01.460 in a very bad position
00:10:03.020 on the budget
00:10:03.580 oh there's my voice going on
00:10:05.500 he's put himself
00:10:08.180 in a very bad position
00:10:09.640 on the budget
00:10:10.260 because he has a budget
00:10:11.600 that seeks to please
00:10:13.080 absolutely nobody
00:10:14.520 if you wanted more
00:10:15.900 fiscal responsibility
00:10:16.960 and either were
00:10:17.940 a conservative voter
00:10:18.800 or you were a liberal voter
00:10:20.080 believing that Carney
00:10:21.040 was going to be more responsible
00:10:22.220 this budget
00:10:23.300 with its 78 billion dollar deficit
00:10:25.500 and 54 million dollars
00:10:27.920 for deficit servicing alone
00:10:30.780 you are unimpressed
00:10:32.260 if you are on
00:10:33.720 the progressive left
00:10:34.960 in the NDP
00:10:36.240 the Bloc 0.80
00:10:37.500 or even part of the liberal party
00:10:39.380 who thought Carney
00:10:40.280 was going to be more progressive
00:10:41.420 you don't like this
00:10:42.660 because there are too many
00:10:43.720 cost saving measures
00:10:44.720 that may end up reducing
00:10:46.420 the amount of public employees
00:10:48.180 working in Ottawa
00:10:49.180 and Gatineau
00:10:50.040 and so you are unimpressed
00:10:51.880 for that reason
00:10:52.600 there will be some people
00:10:54.060 who like it obviously
00:10:55.240 just as there are party loyalists
00:10:57.200 who like anything
00:10:57.880 that their government does
00:10:59.120 but in general
00:11:00.540 they end up splitting the baby
00:11:02.240 in such a way
00:11:02.960 that I think sets them up
00:11:04.240 very poorly
00:11:04.840 in the next election
00:11:05.780 because it gives
00:11:06.460 the conservatives
00:11:07.280 a clear
00:11:08.060 fiscally responsible
00:11:09.660 like a platform
00:11:11.620 to be running on
00:11:12.420 and they can say
00:11:13.160 the liberals
00:11:13.640 have been irresponsible
00:11:14.820 and then the NDP
00:11:17.100 the Bloc 0.80
00:11:17.780 and even the Greens
00:11:18.660 can then say
00:11:19.620 that the liberal party
00:11:21.320 has been compromised
00:11:22.180 by conservative policies
00:11:23.820 and conservative politics
00:11:25.740 so that's why
00:11:26.960 we need
00:11:27.880 like you know
00:11:28.380 you should be voting for us
00:11:29.440 and abandoning
00:11:30.180 the liberal party
00:11:30.980 because they betrayed you
00:11:32.140 and they're acting
00:11:32.660 too much like Pierre Polyev
00:11:33.920 even though they're not
00:11:35.200 like again
00:11:35.980 the liberals
00:11:36.860 can pretend all day long
00:11:38.200 that they're
00:11:38.640 you know reducing spending
00:11:39.900 and they're being
00:11:40.480 more responsible
00:11:41.240 but you can't say
00:11:43.260 hey look
00:11:43.840 in our household budget
00:11:45.060 I cut down
00:11:45.980 on the junk food
00:11:47.220 budget by 50%
00:11:48.940 yes I did buy
00:11:50.520 the Lamborghini
00:11:51.260 but hey look
00:11:51.980 the junk food
00:11:53.100 budget's down
00:11:54.440 you can't drive
00:11:55.460 to places like
00:11:56.400 in the Lamborghini
00:11:57.660 with junk food
00:11:58.440 so the Lamborghini
00:11:59.540 does have more utility
00:12:00.780 than the junk food
00:12:01.820 does
00:12:02.080 I'm like
00:12:02.520 okay
00:12:03.040 I understand that
00:12:04.620 I understand that
00:12:05.740 you can do more
00:12:06.980 with an automobile
00:12:08.020 even if it's
00:12:09.080 kind of a slightly
00:12:10.200 useless luxury automobile
00:12:11.620 than with a bunch
00:12:13.200 of Twinkies
00:12:13.920 but maybe we shouldn't
00:12:15.400 be spending on
00:12:16.560 either the Twinkies
00:12:18.040 or the Lamborghini
00:12:19.720 because that is
00:12:20.280 effectively what we have
00:12:21.440 in this budget
00:12:22.000 we have
00:12:22.540 40 billion dollars
00:12:24.180 going towards
00:12:24.940 a plan
00:12:25.540 to build
00:12:26.560 like a green
00:12:27.880 like to expanding
00:12:30.220 a green electrical grid
00:12:31.660 across Canada
00:12:32.400 and we have
00:12:33.500 a bunch of money
00:12:34.240 going towards
00:12:35.120 Carney's plan
00:12:35.820 for modular housing
00:12:37.140 which will make
00:12:38.360 very substandard housing
00:12:39.600 probably over budget
00:12:40.900 for what people
00:12:41.580 are getting
00:12:42.060 so yeah
00:12:43.520 we have
00:12:44.260 the potential
00:12:45.640 staffing budget
00:12:46.900 going down
00:12:47.620 for certain areas
00:12:48.560 of government
00:12:49.040 but a lot of other
00:12:50.140 budgets are skyrocketing
00:12:51.440 and I'm super skeptical
00:12:53.080 that we're actually
00:12:53.980 going to be seeing
00:12:54.700 large layoffs
00:12:55.460 I think what you're
00:12:56.080 going to see
00:12:56.380 is large labor
00:12:57.180 transfers 0.52
00:12:57.800 where people
00:12:58.980 are losing their jobs
00:13:00.060 and then just going
00:13:01.100 to the new departments
00:13:01.920 and getting a job there
00:13:02.980 or somebody in Ottawa
00:13:04.740 is losing a job
00:13:05.480 but then we have
00:13:06.140 public employees
00:13:06.960 being employed
00:13:07.660 in other areas
00:13:08.640 of the country
00:13:09.300 maybe it's a smart
00:13:10.560 thing for Carney
00:13:11.140 to do
00:13:11.480 because it looks
00:13:11.940 like he's creating
00:13:12.660 jobs outside
00:13:13.800 of his super safe
00:13:15.320 area of Ottawa
00:13:16.620 but I don't think
00:13:18.340 it's really going
00:13:18.860 to be dazzling
00:13:19.580 that many people
00:13:20.400 when it comes
00:13:21.020 like right down
00:13:21.920 to the real results
00:13:23.080 I think right now
00:13:24.660 we're actually
00:13:25.180 in a very
00:13:26.940 kind of unsafe
00:13:30.440 period for the government
00:13:31.400 because while I think
00:13:33.080 that the NDP
00:13:33.660 and the bloc
00:13:34.440 I think the bloc
00:13:35.100 is going to abstain
00:13:35.660 but I think the NDP
00:13:36.460 and then maybe
00:13:37.840 Elizabeth May
00:13:38.520 are going to push
00:13:39.240 this budget through
00:13:40.620 the NDP are probably
00:13:42.340 only voting for it
00:13:43.360 one because they're
00:13:44.020 a little bankrupt
00:13:44.560 at the moment
00:13:45.200 and two because
00:13:46.200 they're going through
00:13:46.940 a leadership race
00:13:48.000 Don Davies and the NDP
00:13:49.720 could easily say
00:13:50.620 you know what
00:13:51.380 it's horrible
00:13:52.320 that the liberals
00:13:53.140 are effectively
00:13:53.940 forcing us to vote
00:13:55.000 for such a bad budget
00:13:55.920 because they know
00:13:56.640 we're in a leadership race
00:13:57.640 but we vow
00:13:58.680 there's going to be
00:13:59.680 an election
00:14:00.120 within a year
00:14:00.880 because of this
00:14:02.500 you know
00:14:02.760 original sin
00:14:03.820 of the liberal government
00:14:04.900 forcing the NDP
00:14:05.880 to vote for this budget
00:14:07.220 is what is going
00:14:08.320 to cause this government
00:14:09.360 not to last a year
00:14:10.500 so I actually do see
00:14:12.140 there being a good setup
00:14:13.680 for having a spring election
00:14:15.580 or even an election
00:14:16.420 sometime in March
00:14:17.540 or up to the spring
00:14:19.200 or summer of next year
00:14:20.800 that could easily happen
00:14:22.380 because
00:14:22.780 one Mark Carney
00:14:24.340 is the type of guy
00:14:24.920 he really doesn't like
00:14:25.960 having to work
00:14:26.420 with other parties
00:14:27.040 he is very much
00:14:28.180 someone who just wants
00:14:28.900 to be able to
00:14:29.520 unilaterally move
00:14:30.960 and not have to negotiate
00:14:32.060 it's just his personality
00:14:33.240 the NDP also knows
00:14:34.860 that if they capitulate
00:14:35.660 to the liberals
00:14:36.320 their party is going
00:14:37.300 to go extinct
00:14:37.900 just as it almost did
00:14:39.180 under Jagmeet Singh's
00:14:40.480 lack of leadership
00:14:41.180 and then the Bloc Quebecois
00:14:42.680 obviously
00:14:43.280 because Carney
00:14:44.580 is such a unilateral leader
00:14:46.640 and doesn't want
00:14:47.200 to have to talk to them
00:14:48.020 they know that
00:14:49.180 the way they're going
00:14:49.720 to get back
00:14:50.280 at the liberals
00:14:51.020 is trying to trigger
00:14:52.220 an early election
00:14:53.040 and rip back
00:14:53.940 a bunch of their seats
00:14:54.620 because the liberals
00:14:55.480 are not pro-Quebec enough
00:14:57.340 or whatever
00:14:57.900 so that's the current
00:14:59.600 situation that we're in
00:15:00.900 this Matt Gennaro thing
00:15:02.440 I think is going
00:15:03.140 to be one of those things
00:15:03.820 everyone's going
00:15:04.340 to forget about
00:15:05.020 within three or four months
00:15:06.460 when the by-election
00:15:07.300 is called
00:15:07.820 and the seat is filled
00:15:08.600 by another conservative
00:15:10.400 maybe me
00:15:11.360 I'm kind of kidding
00:15:12.360 I say I'm kind of kidding
00:15:13.860 I'm like fully kidding
00:15:15.000 but it's one of those things
00:15:15.980 where it's like
00:15:16.320 oh that'd be neat
00:15:17.020 obviously not going to happen
00:15:18.400 but we're going to fill it
00:15:21.900 with a new conservative
00:15:22.780 the conservatives
00:15:23.540 contest their mettle
00:15:24.560 in an Edmonton by-election
00:15:26.200 and then the world
00:15:27.820 will spin on
00:15:28.540 and we'll probably have
00:15:29.320 a real election
00:15:30.080 sometime after that
00:15:31.200 but right now
00:15:33.880 with the stuff going on
00:15:35.560 with the budget
00:15:36.120 I think that Carney
00:15:37.380 thinks he's building himself
00:15:39.140 like a new re-election narrative
00:15:41.040 by doing all these investments
00:15:42.780 but I think this trick
00:15:44.040 has been done
00:15:44.640 too many times before
00:15:45.760 by Justin Trudeau
00:15:46.820 for it to be really effective
00:15:47.980 and these days
00:15:49.240 especially with the tariffs
00:15:50.500 seeming like they may go away
00:15:51.940 in the United States
00:15:52.800 there's going to be like
00:15:53.940 no re-election
00:15:54.960 narrative for Mark Carney
00:15:57.360 to actually be running on
00:15:58.500 he's just going to be the guy
00:15:59.660 who spent us into a hole
00:16:01.200 but had like some
00:16:02.800 anti-Trump justification
00:16:03.700 for it
00:16:04.280 even though the justification
00:16:05.500 completely died off
00:16:06.740 he's just another
00:16:07.680 spendthrift liberal
00:16:08.660 anyways
00:16:09.760 so that should truly be
00:16:11.360 the end of this video
00:16:12.200 thank you guys for tuning in
00:16:13.840 like, share, and subscribe
00:16:15.160 do all that fantastic stuff
00:16:16.580 and I'll see you guys all
00:16:17.560 later
00:16:18.200 and I'll see you guys next time
00:16:19.820 and I'll see you guys next time