The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - March 12, 2024


Canadian Leftists are 'too smart' for Common Sense


Episode Stats


Length

10 minutes

Words per minute

198.20108

Word count

2,064

Sentence count

107

Harmful content

Toxicity

10

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I talk about why so many Canadians are still voting for the Liberals and the NDP, and why it's a symptom of a false sense of being "elitist" that keeps them afloat in the polls.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 I think a false sense of being elite is actually a major root cause as to why we still see such a
00:00:05.780 large chunk of Canadians still willing to cast a ballot for the Liberals and the NDP in the next
00:00:10.820 election. Like, don't get me wrong, the Conservatives are still going to smash them in 2025.
00:00:16.000 Some polls are putting the Conservatives up ahead of the Liberals by 21%. But without fail,
00:00:22.060 in the comment section of all the videos where I talk about polling, there are some people saying,
00:00:26.740 I can't believe the Liberals and the NDP still have like 23% or 21%, like depending on the poll,
00:00:32.220 like here's an example. And yes, that is kind of frustrating that there are still that many people
00:00:37.100 who don't seem to notice that the Liberals and the NDP's policies have failed over the last nine
00:00:41.720 years. But I don't think that's the point for why so many people are still voting for them.
00:00:46.420 I think a lot of people, and this is not the majority of the parties, but there's a hardcore
00:00:50.380 base to both the Liberals and the NDP who support those parties because it is the degreed person's 0.81
00:00:55.980 party. It is the intellectual choice. It is the educated person's choice. And they believe
00:01:01.160 that they are supposed to vote Liberal to signify the fact that they're not some simplistic rube
00:01:06.940 who is following the pure poly of common sense agenda. They are better than common sense. They
00:01:13.120 are too smart for common sense. And I think an article that really captures this sort of snobby arrogance
00:01:19.220 is this one from an aptly named publication from Montreal titled Cult MTL. The article reads,
00:01:26.900 the less educated you are, the more likely you are to have a positive opinion of pure poly of.
00:01:31.900 And there are so many Liberal people who will read this article and crow with the fact that they're
00:01:36.880 not so undereducated to support the Conservative Party. The Conservative Party is for foolish, dumb people. 1.00
00:01:42.680 And no, just having a degree does not actually mean you're smart. I only think I have to say that. 1.00
00:01:47.800 It's so obvious. Having a degree just means that you have the degree. You've jumped through the hoops
00:01:52.540 to get that degree. And now you have it. I have seen so many people in different programs that I've
00:01:58.100 taken at university. I have a bachelor degree and a master's degree. And I would not trust a lot of
00:02:03.000 the people in my master's degree program to run the government because they have very wacky ideas from
00:02:08.220 being in academia for so long. The person who has started a business by themselves and only has a high
00:02:14.080 school diploma is miles smarter than the PhD who studies gender. Having common sense is a fairly
00:02:21.620 intellectual thing to possess. And so many people who go to university to get degrees in nothing are
00:02:28.320 not exactly hyper-intelligent people. They are educated. They have been educated into a specific
00:02:34.700 ideology or set of factual information about a subject. But that doesn't mean that those skills
00:02:41.540 or that sort of way of thinking about things translates to good ideas in the real world.
00:02:47.680 Like STEM degrees definitely make you smart in the specific things that you study. Like I'm never
00:02:52.360 going to have some guy who's really good at computer science come and tell me how economics works
00:02:56.900 because I just don't think he really has any clue about it unless he can prove he has like common
00:03:01.960 sense knowledge about how the economy works. But in my master's program, I'm not even kidding,
00:03:06.400 day one. I had someone get mad at me for saying that we should maybe arrest homeless drug addicts
00:03:12.100 and make sure that they forcibly detox so that they can actually live more productive lives.
00:03:16.820 And I said that, you know, if you ever look at a homeless person on the street, I'm not trying to
00:03:20.020 be rude or anything, but it's just true that if you follow them around for the entire day, you'd
00:03:24.240 probably find them committing five to six crimes. And by enforcing those crimes, by actually enforcing the
00:03:30.120 law on those crimes, you could arrest them and then make sure that they actually get off drugs or push
00:03:35.000 them off of drugs. Whereas a lot of this decriminalization stuff actually takes away
00:03:39.360 tools for police to intervene with these people and try and get them help. Because if they can't
00:03:43.580 arrest them for any of these misdemeanor crimes, well, they have to wait for them to commit a major
00:03:47.340 crime to try and force them to get help or they have to let them sit there. But I had someone in
00:03:52.280 this program day one say that I was being like a horrible person and I'm stigmatizing homelessness.
00:03:58.940 And the first step to ending homelessness is to de-stigmatize the problem. Like, okay, good,
00:04:04.320 good job, lady. Yeah, we need to go over to people's encampments and lay brochures in front
00:04:10.160 of their tents and say, it's okay that you're on drugs. You're, you're like smoking crack on the
00:04:14.880 streets. Just know that I do not hold it against you. And here's a pamphlet for some sort of clinic
00:04:20.920 you can go to. You gotta be overeducated to believe in such stupid things as that a problem needs to be 1.00
00:04:26.940 de-stigmatized before that we can actually deal with it. Goodness. But I want to dive into the 1.00
00:04:34.140 actual stats that article from Cult MTL went over. It's from Angus Reid. And yes, it actually is true
00:04:40.400 that if you have more education, you're more likely to vote for the liberals of the NDP. Doesn't mean
00:04:45.900 that you're actually smart for voting for them. It just means that you have a degree and you happen
00:04:49.560 to be voting for a dumb party. But it shows people who have high school education have a 24% very 0.88
00:04:56.620 favorable of pure poly of and 19% somewhat favorable with 16% somewhat unfavorable and 29% some are very
00:05:04.700 unfavorable. And then when you get up to people with university degrees, 13% are very in favor of pure
00:05:10.620 poly of 18% somewhat 18% somewhat disfavorable and 43% very unfavorable view of pure poly of. And to that,
00:05:21.100 I say, who cares? It doesn't actually mean anything. Again, like I've said before, just because you have
00:05:27.280 a PhD doesn't mean you actually understand how the economy works. I trust someone who actually started
00:05:32.280 their own business far more than I have to trust someone with an arts PhD who's going to tell me
00:05:37.400 that we need to like put caps on rent to lower the cost of housing as if just price fixing has ever
00:05:44.000 actually solved a problem in the short term. But these people who have master's degrees are actually
00:05:48.620 very disproportionately likely to vote for the liberals and the NDP who approach a problem like
00:05:53.800 high prices and just look at and say, well, why can't we just mandate the prices be lower? They actually
00:05:59.920 think that rent control is a good policy, because these people have no historical knowledge. They do not
00:06:05.440 have the common sense view of history of knowing that when price fixing occurred in the 70s, it caused the
00:06:11.480 supply of those goods to go away. So while yes, you could buy it for an affordable price, if you were the one
00:06:17.840 of the lucky people to find an apartment for rent or different products that were like available at
00:06:24.440 the price of pricks. Oh, oh, my goodness, I am falling over myself. You're lucky if you can find
00:06:30.040 the product at the fixed price. But if you can't, you don't get the thing. And this is where so many
00:06:35.560 on the left believe that their ideas are more intellectual because they are, you know, their policy
00:06:40.480 papers are so long and nuanced. But if the idea is bad, who cares? I see people all the time on the left,
00:06:46.740 and they'll mock conservative policies for being simplistic. And they'll praise a liberal policy
00:06:52.820 because it's 110 pages. Look at all the detail here. If the fundamental policy sucks, who cares?
00:06:59.320 I do not read policies in detail. If on the first paragraph, the entire thing is stupid, 1.00
00:07:05.100 because what is it going to not be stupid once I get to page 110, where I'm just reading detail about 1.00
00:07:10.220 the stupid policy? There are so many people who trick themselves. It's the very wonkish mentality 1.00
00:07:15.380 that, you know, hard thinking about policy leads to good solutions. Not always. Oftentimes,
00:07:21.800 the common sense, simple solution is the best. This is where you get leftists in the media saying,
00:07:27.260 pure poly of has no plan. All he wants to do is cut things, get rid of the carbon tax and all this
00:07:32.200 stuff. Yeah, that's actually what will make the country better. Reducing immigration, cutting the 1.00
00:07:36.680 carbon tax, cutting income taxes, cutting regulations and reducing the size of government
00:07:40.380 is exactly what we need. Well, he's not proposing anything. He's just proposing get rid of stuff.
00:07:45.600 Yeah, because it's what needs to be done to solve the problem. It's not that we don't have enough
00:07:50.680 government programs to gird up the economy to get us onto new heights of prosperity. It's that the
00:07:56.720 government is actually holding down people's prosperity and trying to redistribute the gains
00:08:00.800 of other individuals to people who are less well off to pretend that they're actually helping people
00:08:05.860 when they're usually making people who are also less well off, even worse off just to help one
00:08:10.920 person. It is, again, the idea that you are going to rob Paul to help Bill. It is a foolish idea. But
00:08:17.880 if you have a master's degree, you think it's fantastic because it feels so intricate and it
00:08:22.580 feels so caring that we're taking money from this rich, terrible person and handing it to this virtuous
00:08:28.260 person who doesn't have as much income. It's a very intellectually satisfying solution if you've been in
00:08:34.640 university for eight to 12 years. But if you actually know how things work, if you know the
00:08:39.580 market on an intimate level, having been a business owner or having been a contractor or being a real
00:08:46.180 person who works in the economy, not just someone who intellectualized about the economy, you know
00:08:51.460 that actually getting the government out of the way is what is going to enable success. But anyways,
00:08:57.040 that's my rant on this really stupid mentality on the left of thinking that the liberals and the NDP 0.99
00:09:02.440 are intellectual. I just want to quickly plug the fact that I, Wyatt Claypool, am running for the 0.98
00:09:07.780 Calgary Signal Hill Conservative Party nomination. If you live in this riding, please buy a membership
00:09:13.000 and vote for me. This is what the riding boundaries look like. Go check out my website,
00:09:16.760 WyattClaypool.com. If you previously lived in Bowness and you think you live in my riding,
00:09:21.400 you don't anymore because in April the riding boundaries are changing so you'll be out.
00:09:26.040 And if you live in Curry Barracks, Ross, Caro, or Lincoln Park, you will then also be in my riding.
00:09:30.280 So buy a membership or contact someone you know who lives in the riding, get them to buy a
00:09:34.560 membership. And also you can contribute to the National Telegraph and myself's legal fund. We
00:09:41.320 have this billionaire developer suing us over nonsense. It's a defamation case where he has
00:09:45.260 not proven any evidence of defamation. And he's just mad that one of our guest writers referenced
00:09:50.600 a long investigative article about him from the Globe and Mail. He evidently never sued the Globe and
00:09:55.500 Mail because he knew he'd get smashed in court. But he thought if he sued a 21-year-old,
00:09:59.720 I was 21 when this whole thing started, if he sued a 21-year-old, maybe he could get a false apology
00:10:04.760 and pretend everything negative ever said about him is actually false because, look, I have a piece
00:10:09.280 of paper showing that this person apologized. We don't apologize for nonsense at the National
00:10:14.120 Telegraph. So we're $26,000 deep in defending ourselves. If you can contribute anything to the
00:10:19.520 legal fund, it really helps us out. Give, send, go link is in the description below. Have a great one,
00:10:24.460 everybody.