The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - November 03, 2024


Canadian politicians enable Khalistani thugs on our streets


Episode Stats

Length

10 minutes

Words per Minute

168.7713

Word Count

1,733

Sentence Count

106

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

8


Summary

In the wake of the attack on a Hindu temple in Brampton, Canada, only two MPs have been able to even call out the perpetrators as "Calistanis" and even then, only because it's politically incorrect to do so. And yet somehow, even as Canadian politicians are saying that this is bad, the vast majority of them just say, wow, there was unacceptable violence against the Hindu community.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 One of the most frustrating aspects of Canadian politics is the backward way that the liberal
00:00:06.080 political establishment treats different groups of people. If you're a Canadian, for example,
00:00:11.520 who, you know, went to go fight with ISIS in Syria, in the minds of the Canadian liberal
00:00:16.680 establishment, it's all cool. You can come back, just attend a couple info sessions about how you
00:00:22.720 shouldn't kill people anymore. But if you're a parent who protests gender theory being taught
00:00:27.540 in schools, you will be arrested and treated like a national security threat. It's absolutely
00:00:33.360 ridiculous. And I think that this is a great example today of how the Canadian political
00:00:39.040 establishment just doesn't care about actual extremists and is scared to even name who they
00:00:45.480 are because it's politically incorrect to do so for some reason. So today in Brampton, there was an
00:00:51.680 attack on a Hindu temple by a bunch of crazy Calistani activists. And there's only been
00:00:57.440 two MPs who are able to even label them as Calistanis, and they're literally advertising
00:01:03.420 it. Here is the video of what went on today.
00:01:33.420 I think you guys all get what the situation is here. This is a Hindu temple. They did not
00:01:40.080 start this fight. It's literally these people, these Calistanis coming to them to pick a fight.
00:01:46.100 And yet somehow, even as Canadian politicians are saying that this is bad, the vast majority of them
00:01:52.000 just say that, wow, there was unacceptable violence against the Hindu community today. Canadians should be
00:01:58.220 able to worship in any way they want without being able to even name check those who are doing this.
00:02:05.200 And you could say, well, what does naming them really do? Isn't calling out the violence enough?
00:02:09.540 It's not. Because if you don't call out the sorts of people doing this, they are not going to be
00:02:14.580 publicly shamed and forced to stop doing this sort of stuff. Public shaming works. But for some reason
00:02:21.240 in Canada, especially within the liberal federal government, we can't call out people who attack
00:02:27.460 Christian and Catholic churches. We can't call out people who attack synagogues and block roads in
00:02:33.520 Jewish neighborhoods. And we can't attack or even name check those who go after Hindu temples because
00:02:39.520 these people are liberal allies. This is how crazy it is today. And I even have to say, if you're a
00:02:45.800 conservative politician, you need to call this stuff out. Who cares if the liberals are going to try and pull
00:02:51.840 some nonsense that you are attacking Sikh activists? These people are not Sikh activists.
00:02:57.460 It would be like if I, it would be like as insulting. Calling these people Sikh activists is insulting to
00:03:04.240 Sikhs. I'm a Baptist. I would be insulted if you called a Westboro Baptist crazy a Baptist activist.
00:03:11.900 They're not. They're just lunatics. And right now, the only two, oddly enough, the only two MPs who have
00:03:18.080 actually called these people out by name as Khalistanis, one of them being a current liberal
00:03:22.960 MP and another being a former liberal MP. Chandra Arya is a Hindu liberal MP, making it more likely he
00:03:30.940 was going to call this out. But he was actually had the backbone to call out these people as violent
00:03:36.360 thugs who are trying to create divisions in Canada. The funny thing is, you get a lot of people online
00:03:42.120 assuming, see, this is what happens when you have mass immigration. And while obviously I oppose mass
00:03:47.620 immigration, this is not a consequence of mass immigration. This is a consequence of not calling
00:03:54.860 out violent thugs. This could be happening from technically any group. This is like how people in
00:04:00.360 the NDP won't call out Antifa, but they'll go after the Proud Boys for doing the exact same violent
00:04:06.200 things that Antifa does. In fact, Antifa probably does it worse because they're usually the ones who start
00:04:11.480 fights. And the other MP alongside Chandra Arya was independent MP who was kicked out of the Liberal
00:04:18.620 Party, Kevin Vong. So I would like for us all to be able to actually name and shame those who do
00:04:25.360 violent things. At the same time, everyone seems perfectly comfortable to use really hyperbolic
00:04:30.800 language to going after, again, parents protesting the protesting gender theory in schools,
00:04:37.000 or truckers parked outside of the Capitol protesting endless lockdowns and mandates.
00:04:42.560 Somehow we have all the most overblown rhetoric for those people because we didn't like the manner
00:04:47.940 in which they protested. But when people are actually saying violent things and attacking people,
00:04:53.260 it just becomes a vague sense of violence that we all have to condemn without being able to name
00:04:58.140 the Kalistanis because that's somehow rude. Or in case of if you're from Sikhs for Justice or the WSO,
00:05:04.700 it's anti-Sikh to say that Kalistanis are bad, even though Kalistanis are a fringe minority of the
00:05:11.600 Sikh community, and the Sikhs don't like them either. Again, it would be like saying that somehow the IRA
00:05:17.740 are a pro-Catholic group. It's deeply insulting. I just want to pull up a post I made about it. And
00:05:24.880 actually, I'll go to Mocha's post. Mocha's been doing a really good job covering all these crazy
00:05:29.180 protests going on. This is not normal stuff. I'll show you the sorts of signs that these
00:05:34.680 people are currently showing at all their protests. This was video captured by Mocha
00:05:41.540 Beruzian, I think is the way you say his name. Make sure you guys go follow him, Beruzian
00:05:45.700 Mocha, on Twitter. He does a really good job of capturing these protests.
00:05:49.680 Look at this. These people who would just call themselves humanitarian Sikh activists,
00:06:05.860 they're not, literally have cardboard cutouts of the event in 1984-5 of Indira Gandhi, the then
00:06:14.640 Prime Minister of India's bodyguards shooting her to death. Insane. These people are going
00:06:19.720 to pretend that we're just protesting against the Indian government's past actions against Sikh
00:06:25.540 people in India. Yes, there was anti-Sikh riots in 1984. That's awful. That's terrible. It was
00:06:32.460 definitely, it wasn't, I wouldn't say it's genocidal, but just because I have a very strict
00:06:36.300 definition of what a genocide is. It was a hateful massacre. It was like, you know, what you would
00:06:40.860 usually consider to be some sort of like a war crime if it was a war zone. Awful. But none of
00:06:46.000 these people who are protesting this Hindu temple, where I think there was like an Indian official
00:06:50.060 there, actually care. They are standing on the dead bodies of people who were killed in 1984
00:06:55.260 in order to push their own violent rhetoric. Because those people will never actually condemn
00:07:00.180 like the Air India bombing, or Calistani terrorism in India, or Calistanis trying to beat people to death
00:07:06.460 in Canada for disagreeing with them, like Ujjal Dasanj. That's all totally fine. But, and this is
00:07:12.800 again, this is why we need to call this stuff out. For some reason, it is politically incorrect to call
00:07:17.680 up people like this, while it is very politically correct to call up people with very overheated
00:07:23.000 rhetoric for simply protesting things that they don't like, in very peaceful manners. There are
00:07:28.860 obviously some people that people could pull up from a, you know, pro-parental rights protest who I
00:07:33.900 would disagree with what they were doing. But that is not even in the ballpark of what's going on at
00:07:39.780 these protests. And especially the people who are protesting gender theory in schools actually have
00:07:44.800 a good point. They are actually protesting something bad, where these people are basically just trying to
00:07:50.140 create divisions within Canada. And so this is what's enabling these people, not calling them out,
00:07:56.260 not calling up pro-Hamas people enables them, not calling out those who burn down Christian and
00:08:01.920 Catholic churches enables them. It is giving a tacit wink to what they're doing, because we,
00:08:07.680 you know, will condemn the tactic, but we won't condemn the motive. That's exactly what NDP MP Leah
00:08:13.260 Gazin did when Conservative MP Garnett Genui called her out for not being able to condemn churches being
00:08:20.200 burned down around Canada. She says, well, I don't know who's doing it. I don't know what motivates them.
00:08:24.400 As if it would matter. As if it would even matter who was doing it. And really, was she just
00:08:30.740 going to say that, well, if it's someone who's First Nations burning it down, then it's okay.
00:08:34.980 Which doesn't make sense at all, because actually most of the churches actually in Western Canada
00:08:39.400 especially end up having a lot of family records for First Nations people. And so that's awful if
00:08:45.220 anyone was burning them down, since it's mostly impacting First Nations people, since that's where
00:08:49.400 the churches were located. But it's crazy that we seem to have a time, place, and manner
00:08:54.560 idea for when extremism actually matters. It depends on who's doing it. And even sometimes it
00:09:01.480 depends on who's doing it, whether something that's not actually extremist is called extremist.
00:09:06.980 You're a Christian protesting at some sort of abortion clinic? Well, you're an extremist.
00:09:11.800 Someone can agree or disagree with that protest, but that's obviously not extreme. But it's politically
00:09:15.940 correct to say it's extreme. You're literally attacking Hindu people? Well, we're not going to name
00:09:20.760 you. We'll just say it's bad to hit those people. This is Canada right now. Insane. Anyways, if you
00:09:28.320 guys want to help the show, make sure you subscribe to the channel, like this video, and you can donate
00:09:33.580 to the Give, Send, Go link in the description below, as well as pinned at the top of the comments.
00:09:39.740 And then if you also want my recommendation for different politicians or people in nominations to
00:09:45.240 support, if you want better local representation, you can also sign up down at my website in
00:09:50.740 the description below, as well as pinned at the top of the comments. WyattClaypool.com. There are
00:09:55.900 going to be two upcoming leadership races in the near future in Manitoba and New Brunswick. So those
00:10:01.600 will be two races I'm going to focus on a lot. And as nominations are going on in different parts of
00:10:06.200 the country, I can give recommendations if people want them. I can email people specifically in those
00:10:11.200 areas so that they're in the know. Anyways, that's it for me today, guys. Have a good one.