The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Carney attacks Pierre Poilievre but makes him sound GREAT!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. Remember when Mark Carney was supposed to be completely different than Justin Trudeau?

00:00:08.120 Ostensibly, he had run to replace Justin Trudeau as liberal leader because he was going to bring fresh new ideas to a tired and unpopular liberal government.

00:00:17.800 Well, in the theme of Canadian politics, which is nothing ever changes, Mark Carney has quickly devolved into Justin Trudeau with worse hair and no charisma.

00:00:28.540 It's kind of funny how other than getting rid of the carbon tax, which was just stealing Pierre Polyev's idea, Carney is just there affirming all the things the liberal government was already doing or promised to do and never did.

00:00:41.960 And the media and many Canadians are pretending like, wow, this is so interesting and new. It's not. It's not. It's literally been done in 2015, 2019, and 2021.

00:00:53.860 Throughout all of those campaigns, Justin Trudeau ran on the exact same things as Mark Carney is right now.

00:01:02.620 In fact, I want to highlight this video because it's kind of hilarious.

00:01:06.300 Mark Carney reaffirms himself to spending massive amounts of Canadian taxpayer money overseas, and then he makes Polyev sound really cool by saying,

00:01:15.300 well, don't vote for that guy. He's going to cut off all this useless foreign aid.

00:01:20.100 So I'm going to cut to that in just a second. I do just want to remind you guys, if you like my coverage of the Canadian federal election,

00:01:25.840 make sure to like the video, subscribe to the channel if you're not yet a subscriber,

00:01:29.260 and leave a comment. It helps us in the algorithm, and I like to scroll through a few times to see what people are saying about the topic of the day.

00:01:36.480 Anyways, so here is Mark Carney answering a journalist question while making PurePolyev look really good.

00:01:44.560 And again, is there any daylight between what Carney believes and what Justin Trudeau was doing before him?

00:01:50.940 Sir Carney, would you cut foreign aid from the current ODA and financing levels?

00:01:56.900 And what is your broader vision for Canada when it comes to global development?

00:02:00.820 Okay, so the short answer is no. My government will not cut foreign aid, and we will be releasing our platform soon.

00:02:11.240 By the way, if you guys have an ah counter going, I think we're up at six or seven already.

00:02:16.460 So you can see that. That is a direct contrast to Mr. Polyev, who will not just cut foreign aid,

00:02:22.360 but taking his cue from the Americans, he will eliminate foreign aid.

00:02:27.020 He will eliminate foreign aid to those most affected around the world, most punished around the world.

00:02:33.660 He'll eliminate foreign aid by extension to the Middle East, to Ukraine as well.

00:02:39.240 And he will use the money for other purposes, presumably for tax cuts, which is normally what he does when he cuts programs.

00:02:46.840 Like, stop threatening Saul with a good time.

00:02:49.580 I already liked Polyev enough.

00:02:52.020 But man, if you're in a making Polyev sound cool competition, you best hope that Mark Carney isn't your main competitor,

00:03:01.760 because that guy is going to mop the floor with you, making Polyev sound fantastic,

00:03:05.800 by saying that not only is he going to get rid of foreign aid, he's also going to use it to cut your taxes.

00:03:13.320 Amazing?

00:03:14.840 The conservatives should really seize on this.

00:03:17.160 And point out, so is this guy actually saying that to continue paying for tens of millions of dollars of abortions in West Africa

00:03:27.160 and sending Hamas money, we're not going to fight, we're not going to use that money for, you know,

00:03:33.760 protecting our economy from the Americans. 0.96

00:03:35.460 We're not going to cut our own taxes.

00:03:37.100 We're just, we're going to continue paying for abortions. 0.99

00:03:39.400 We're going to continue paying Hamas to try and kill Jewish people in Israel. 0.97

00:03:43.200 And then we're going to send money to like Bangladesh to people, teach people how to, you know, like, I don't know, make baskets in the, like, you know, 0.98

00:03:54.200 I don't even know weave baskets.

00:03:55.600 What do we even spend money on in Bangladesh? 1.00

00:03:57.680 I was going to say like a gender theory jazz tap dancing group.

00:04:01.720 But that's probably actually too realistic for what the Canadian government currently spends money on.

00:04:07.140 I got lost there because I was trying to find a hyperbolic example and I realized I couldn't go hyperbolic enough to parody the type of things that we spend money on.

00:04:15.360 Like, didn't we do like diarrhea research in Pakistan or something like that to the tune of tens of millions and we don't know what it was actually spent on?

00:04:23.300 Anyways, but the conservatives really should seize on this because he's just openly admitting he actually doesn't care about Canadians. 0.94

00:04:30.060 He actually does not give a crap and he would be rather, he'd be willing to keep spending your money overseas. 0.96

00:04:35.960 At the same time, he was fear-mongering that the U.S. is going to take us over and eat our lunch economically. 0.98

00:04:43.420 The conservatives should run on across-the-board tax cuts because for some reason Carney's against them.

00:04:48.160 Run on across-the-board tax cuts and then beat this guy to death on the topic that you're actually willing to keep Canadians and Canadian corporations taxed at sky-high levels

00:04:58.120 at the same time that you're talking about the economic threat of the U.S.

00:05:02.880 That's delusional.

00:05:04.120 But anyways, I want to move on to another topic before I get back to talk about the liberals

00:05:09.100 and that is an actual great policy announcement today by Pierre Polyev on the topic of crime.

00:05:16.320 Crime is actually my whole background research topic that I've done for a long time.

00:05:21.820 Crime is through the roof in this country.

00:05:23.540 I just looked it up.

00:05:24.800 Total violent crime instances since 2015 are up 30.5%.

00:05:28.980 Even per capita, it's up 11.5%.

00:05:32.360 Violent crime.

00:05:33.700 It's insane.

00:05:34.740 We cannot go on with another four years of liberal catch and release.

00:05:39.300 We need a change to bring safety back to our streets.

00:05:43.200 That's why I am announcing today that a future conservative government will bring that change.

00:05:48.320 Not only will we repeal liberal catch and release laws,

00:05:51.480 we will carry out the biggest crackdown on crime in Canadian history.

00:05:54.820 And we will do it by passing the three strikes you're out law.

00:06:00.020 Three strikes you're out means that anyone convicted of three serious offenses

00:06:06.620 will be ineligible thereafter for bail, probation, parole, or house arrest.

00:06:12.980 And they will serve a minimum of 10 years behind bars, a maximum of life imprisonment,

00:06:20.360 and they will have to earn their release even still.

00:06:24.580 I really ask Canadians who are basing their vote and deciding to vote liberal

00:06:30.700 because in some weird theory, Donald Trump's going to be really mad about you voting liberal,

00:06:36.680 and that's a great way of getting back at him.

00:06:38.960 Do you not care about the threat of violent crime?

00:06:42.040 How just lots of communities across Canada have been completely hollowed up by violent crime?

00:06:47.100 When I say there was a 30% increase across Canada,

00:06:50.500 in provinces like British Columbia, violent crime instances are up 50%.

00:06:55.640 In fact, I don't really even care to track it by per capita

00:06:59.300 because per capita acts like there's a certain amount of crime that's acceptable

00:07:03.140 in a certain size population.

00:07:06.940 Not really, because at the same time that, yeah,

00:07:10.400 if crime, you know, if instances of crime had doubled,

00:07:14.200 but the population over a hundred-year period had, like, quadrupled,

00:07:17.740 that's pretty good.

00:07:19.060 The thing is that crime happens in a fixed geographical area,

00:07:22.560 and I hate how people just kind of blase-ly just kind of slough off the idea

00:07:28.340 that crime's that big of an issue.

00:07:29.660 Oh, it's only up 10%.

00:07:31.180 Well, that means, like, another stabbing or two on your street corner every single year,

00:07:36.580 and we're just pretending, well, it's okay because the population went up a lot.

00:07:40.220 Well, the sidewalk hasn't increased in size,

00:07:42.960 and there's more muggings happening on that sidewalk.

00:07:45.640 I don't care that in this weird world where we're all zebras in our herd,

00:07:49.700 that I can technically know that if somebody picks on a mug,

00:07:53.680 it's a little less likely to be me.

00:07:56.240 Even then, per capita is still up.

00:07:58.280 But this is a great policy.

00:07:59.500 They really should push the issue of crime hard, tax cuts hard,

00:08:03.520 because, again, here's another instance.

00:08:06.180 Mark Carney is basically no different than Justin Trudeau,

00:08:09.180 and these are issues that had been motivating Canadians for the past two years

00:08:12.600 to say they were going to vote Conservative until the recent trade conflict.

00:08:16.640 Now that the trade conflict's over,

00:08:18.020 if you really press hard on these issues,

00:08:20.360 you can get a lot of people back.

00:08:21.720 Here's Mark Carney in a montage the Conservatives released

00:08:25.220 talking about how we actually shouldn't be exploiting our energy resources in this country

00:08:29.260 because that's very bad and nasty for some reason.

00:08:31.940 Maybe as much as half of oil reserves, proven reserves,

00:08:35.340 need to stay in the ground if we're going to get to where we are.

00:08:37.660 We can't meet our ultimate objectives,

00:08:39.940 which is to get to net zero emissions.

00:08:42.900 We can't get there unless we do not just have a cap on emissions,

00:08:46.560 but those emissions are brought effectively to zero.

00:08:49.780 You know, the stranded asset problem in the energy sector

00:08:53.240 is going to crystallize sooner than people think.

00:08:57.780 There will be a glutton of oil,

00:08:59.580 and the wisdom of developing new fields,

00:09:03.480 just from an economic perspective, can be called into question.

00:09:07.120 How do you reconcile Keating Bill C-69

00:09:09.860 with your plans to build infrastructure in Canada?

00:09:12.620 Do you plan to repeal Bill C-69?

00:09:14.800 We do not plan to repeal Bill C-69, to answer your question directly.

00:09:20.840 What we have said is society is putting tremendous value on achieving net zero.

00:09:27.180 So the companies and those who invest in them and lend to them

00:09:30.900 who are part of the solution will be rewarded.

00:09:34.020 But those who are lagging behind and are still part of the problem will be punished.

00:09:38.360 So to get to net zero, we need to electrify everything and make electricity green.

00:09:45.680 By the way, that would be a horrible idea,

00:09:48.060 especially in a country like Canada,

00:09:50.200 where you can freeze to death in certain parts of the country

00:09:52.840 if you decide to walk out of the house for eight months of the year. 0.95

00:09:57.260 Putting more things on the grid is a foolish idea.

00:10:01.200 You know what's great about gasoline?

00:10:02.780 It doesn't have to run through a copper wire to your house.

00:10:06.720 It's a liquid that doesn't put pressure on the grid.

00:10:10.320 And in fact, if other power sources burn out,

00:10:13.240 you can actually use gasoline in a power generator

00:10:16.440 to then actually be able to keep the lights on in your own home.

00:10:20.560 But for some reason, this is a travesty in Mark Carney's mind.

00:10:23.860 Anyone who has relatives or friends who are thinking about voting liberal

00:10:28.320 should be shown that video and say,

00:10:29.860 do you agree with his perspective on energy?

00:10:33.040 That we shouldn't be exploiting our resources

00:10:34.720 and then the fact that we should be electrifying all of society

00:10:37.960 and getting off oil and gas.

00:10:39.520 If they say no, you can't vote for that guy.

00:10:42.500 Well, Trump, what about him?

00:10:44.960 What about him?

00:10:46.040 Does he have anything to do with 99% of the things

00:10:49.820 that go on in this country?

00:10:51.300 Not at all.

00:10:52.760 This is for some reason, I don't know why I say this.

00:10:55.100 It's just a 35 second clip from this liberal candidate

00:10:58.140 in one of the Ontario ridings, I believe.

00:11:00.760 For some reason, the liberals are now making a big part of their platform

00:11:04.820 to protect the CBC.

00:11:07.380 This man's pitch has never made me want to cut the CBC harder.

00:11:11.980 Nobody watches it.

00:11:13.560 The people do watch the CBC

00:11:15.440 and they disproportionately obviously are voting to the left

00:11:19.160 on the liberals and the NDP.

00:11:21.080 But like, I don't know that many people

00:11:24.060 who truly are going to like run out of their houses

00:11:27.080 to vote to protect possibly the most boring newscast on the planet.

00:11:32.360 We've been out knocking on doors with volunteers today

00:11:34.640 and hearing from a lot of folks about how they're worried

00:11:36.740 about the threats to Canadian sovereignty.

00:11:39.060 And we can defend and build Canadian sovereignty

00:11:41.240 by having really strong cultural institutions,

00:11:43.460 really strong CBC.

00:11:44.740 We have so many media workers, so many arts workers,

00:11:47.540 people producing Canadian culture in this riding.

00:11:49.700 And we need a government and an MP

00:11:52.100 who's going to stand for those institutions,

00:11:53.700 stand for a strong CBC,

00:11:55.160 and stand against American technology and cultural domination.

00:11:59.120 And this is something I'm really happy to do

00:12:00.820 with so many of the folks who are working on this campaign.

00:12:03.340 I'm not sure if this guy is from the CBC,

00:12:09.400 like he used to work there or a legacy media outlet.

00:12:12.500 But how is it that the CBC,

00:12:14.780 if it's such an important Canadian cultural institution,

00:12:18.320 why is it that every single year on the year,

00:12:22.220 they've been lowering their expectations for audience capture,

00:12:26.720 that they only expect, I think, this year,

00:12:28.860 to get like maybe 2.5% of the Canadian public

00:12:32.340 to watch the CBC even semi-regularly?

00:12:36.380 And these people get $1.4 billion.

00:12:39.020 If you actually increased their budget

00:12:42.200 relative to the US's population,

00:12:44.360 they have a bigger budget than Fox News, CNN, MSNBC,

00:12:49.260 and I guarantee if you combine them,

00:12:51.020 that might be in the approximate range

00:12:52.700 of how much the CBC is given,

00:12:54.560 considering we're a population of about 40 million,

00:12:57.360 and the US is a population of like,

00:12:59.700 what is it, 340 million?

00:13:02.340 Even then, a lot of people in this country don't really,

00:13:05.520 like anyone who doesn't speak English,

00:13:07.200 you can also take them out of the CBC funding,

00:13:09.400 obviously French and English,

00:13:10.540 but in terms of minority communities,

00:13:13.040 oftentimes don't speak English to the provincius

00:13:15.340 and see that they watch English media.

00:13:18.400 So the actual amount of people that the CBC is serving

00:13:21.360 is only like maybe 35 million.

00:13:24.140 It's tiny,

00:13:25.440 considering like the amount of money that they get 0.69

00:13:27.960 and the amount of viewership they have is ridiculous.

00:13:30.780 Per capita, their spending is insane,

00:13:33.160 way bigger than the BBC in the UK.

00:13:35.560 And everything just about the campaign,

00:13:39.740 like they're literally now diving back

00:13:42.020 into old housing policies that Justin Trudeau is pushing.

00:13:45.300 Look, Liberal Party,

00:13:46.720 building more homes for people across the country,

00:13:49.220 Mark Carney can get it done.

00:13:50.600 And it's a headline from the National Observer

00:13:52.380 by Max Fawcett, a leftist propaganda,

00:13:55.400 saying,

00:13:56.040 Mark Carney's housing plan is a big step forward.

00:13:59.280 And here's a quote from your article,

00:14:00.560 And yes, it includes 25 billion in financial support

00:14:04.380 for what is described as quote,

00:14:06.460 innovative prefabricated home builders in Canada

00:14:10.360 using Canadian technologies and resources

00:14:12.520 like mass timber and softwood lumber,

00:14:15.040 along with an additional 10 billion

00:14:16.980 in low cost financing for affordable home builders.

00:14:19.780 It's not going to get done.

00:14:21.480 How do I know it's not going to get done?

00:14:23.400 This is Trudeau's policy from 2015.

00:14:26.120 He also ran on in 2019 and 2021.

00:14:28.500 In fact, Carney was an advisor

00:14:30.840 in the 2021 like government.

00:14:34.080 He was the economic advisor since 2020.

00:14:37.180 And the Trudeau government ran again

00:14:39.640 on the home building plan in 2021.

00:14:43.060 How is it that when he was the economic advisor,

00:14:46.320 never got them to actually build a single home? 0.71

00:14:49.140 It's because government sucks at building homes.

00:14:51.860 If they were good at it, 0.70

00:14:53.200 you wouldn't need the free market

00:14:54.800 because it would just be inefficient.

00:14:56.580 A lot of, I just find this one very funny.

00:14:59.780 I just want to read it.

00:15:00.700 But Zalem Zahid, Zalem Zahid,

00:15:03.260 a liberal candidate here, liberal MP says,

00:15:06.020 it's time for Canada to build.

00:15:07.820 We will use Canadian resources,

00:15:09.580 create high paying jobs for our workers

00:15:11.500 and build more homes Canadians can afford.

00:15:14.060 A Mark Carney led government

00:15:15.340 will double the pace of construction

00:15:16.960 to almost 500,000 new homes a year

00:15:19.720 with a housing plan that will like build home.

00:15:24.120 This is a very awkwardly put out post.

00:15:26.180 But I always liked the whole Canada strong thing

00:15:28.340 above Zalem Zahid,

00:15:30.700 who is in fact somebody who openly

00:15:32.540 like defends and justifies Hamas.

00:15:35.640 The person who couldn't probably care less

00:15:38.360 about Canada as a country

00:15:39.520 is here to tell us Canada strong

00:15:42.020 and they're going to double home building.

00:15:44.020 Even though this government's housing accelerator fund,

00:15:47.140 which Mark Carney had backed and supported,

00:15:50.600 actually caused home building

00:15:52.120 to drop off precipitously in this country.

00:15:55.560 About four years ago,

00:15:56.720 we were building 240,000 homes a year,

00:15:59.220 230,000.

00:16:00.440 And then it went to 220 and then it went to 210.

00:16:03.280 And I think this last year,

00:16:04.320 we only built like 190,000

00:16:06.220 or started to build 190,000 new units. 0.97

00:16:09.840 It's pathetic. 0.93

00:16:11.160 We can't build anything 0.98

00:16:12.360 because we have too many government regulations in the way.

00:16:15.400 By the way, do you know what Mark Carney's plan

00:16:18.340 to build more homes doesn't include?

00:16:20.340 Any deregulation at all

00:16:21.880 because he wants to keep the public employees

00:16:24.240 in charge of enforcing those regulations 1.00

00:16:26.300 in their stupid busy work jobs. 1.00

00:16:29.480 So that should, 1.00

00:16:30.940 I think that's pretty much it for me here today.

00:16:33.420 There's another big rally going on

00:16:36.020 for pure poly of the moment in Brampton.

00:16:38.220 It looks like Brampton and Mississauga

00:16:40.360 might actually be massive bright spots

00:16:42.300 for the conservatives.

00:16:43.500 I've heard that there's a big realignment going on

00:16:46.660 where it's not really a regional election

00:16:49.280 like we usually see Canadian elections in the past

00:16:52.160 where the West vote's very blue

00:16:54.060 and then Ontario,

00:16:55.400 the Toronto area is very liberal

00:16:56.760 and then the rest of the province is very split up

00:16:59.060 and Atlanta, Canada is very liberal

00:17:01.560 and BC is a battleground.

00:17:03.620 It looks like working class neighborhoods,

00:17:06.840 places that have energy jobs,

00:17:08.780 places with a lot of entrepreneurship

00:17:10.920 are going conservative.

00:17:13.580 And those very metropolitan areas,

00:17:15.840 those very kind of upper class,

00:17:18.100 more retired areas are going liberal.

00:17:21.560 I think it's so telling

00:17:22.600 that those who are currently working in the economy

00:17:25.720 and don't watch,

00:17:27.140 like, you know,

00:17:27.540 the type of people who don't watch the CBC,

00:17:29.720 the type of people creating jobs

00:17:31.200 or working hands-on dirty jobs,

00:17:33.580 they're voting conservative

00:17:34.400 and those who are in government jobs

00:17:36.980 or they work white-collar HR jobs

00:17:39.280 are the main constituency at this point

00:17:41.440 for the Liberal Party of Canada

00:17:43.200 opposed to the others who are voting conservative.

00:17:46.500 Anyway, so that should be it for this video, guys.

00:17:49.340 I just want to remind you again,

00:17:50.400 like the video, subscribe to the channel,

00:17:51.860 leave a comment,

00:17:52.580 do all that great stuff.

00:17:54.120 Finally got a haircut.

00:17:55.100 I try and be very economical

00:17:56.660 whenever I get a haircut

00:17:57.680 and wait two months

00:17:58.940 between getting it cut again,

00:18:01.100 you know, save all those dollars

00:18:02.460 by waiting it out a little bit more.

00:18:05.060 But that should be it for this video.

00:18:07.660 In the future,

00:18:08.440 I'm going to try,

00:18:09.340 I'm going to try and wait a few days

00:18:11.100 before I attempt to do any more polling analysis.

00:18:14.200 And I'm not trying to run away

00:18:15.380 from the fact that the polls

00:18:16.700 actually have shifted

00:18:17.660 in the Liberals' favor quite a bit

00:18:19.180 in the last few days,

00:18:20.260 including the polls I trust.

00:18:21.940 And it's not like I now don't trust them.

00:18:23.540 I actually think that Abacus

00:18:24.920 and Innovative Research

00:18:26.240 are picking up on a real swing

00:18:28.040 towards the Liberals.

00:18:29.600 They went from like a tie ballgame

00:18:31.800 or slightly leading conservative

00:18:34.100 to now leading liberal by five points

00:18:36.240 or going liberal by five points.

00:18:38.260 I think that was all trade stuff.

00:18:40.300 The Liberation Day announcement

00:18:41.440 by Donald Trump,

00:18:42.600 as well as just the fallout

00:18:44.280 of all the tariffs being announced,

00:18:46.240 ended up causing people

00:18:47.960 to have this really silly

00:18:49.500 rally around the government kind of effect 0.73

00:18:51.860 where whoever is in government,

00:18:52.960 let's just say we like them

00:18:54.080 because for some reason

00:18:54.900 we deeply hate Donald Trump right now.

00:18:58.160 Now that the tariffs are gone,

00:18:59.520 I think we're going to have to wait

00:19:00.800 for some of these reactionary polls

00:19:02.680 from the tariff announcements

00:19:03.800 to go through.

00:19:05.360 In three or four days,

00:19:06.560 if it's still very pro-liberal,

00:19:08.800 I guess that's what it is.

00:19:10.920 And if it's not,

00:19:11.860 well, I guess we're going to be

00:19:12.720 in a new environment

00:19:13.640 now that the issues

00:19:14.480 of the election have changed.

00:19:16.020 Another thing is that

00:19:17.200 the one reason that it's always,

00:19:19.480 when you look at the polls,

00:19:20.380 it's not you discount poll results,

00:19:22.300 but you have to read them

00:19:23.220 in the context that

00:19:25.260 whenever we poll people

00:19:26.800 who didn't vote in 2021,

00:19:28.420 they're massively conservative.

00:19:30.380 But the fact that you didn't vote

00:19:31.760 in 2021 or previous elections

00:19:33.720 tends to say that you're very unlikely

00:19:35.780 to respond to a poll.

00:19:37.360 And so many pollsters

00:19:38.720 are just not weighting non-voters

00:19:40.740 as a factor in this election

00:19:42.240 because they don't really know

00:19:43.340 how much they're going to show up.

00:19:44.620 If this election is a 73% turnout,

00:19:47.980 74% turnout,

00:19:49.380 which is not unprecedented

00:19:50.180 in Canadian politics at all,

00:19:51.980 and this is a high energy campaign,

00:19:53.900 I think you would actually see

00:19:54.820 the Conservatives

00:19:55.420 potentially handily win

00:19:56.780 or at least handily win

00:19:58.260 a minority government

00:19:59.180 because that would indicate

00:20:00.780 a lot of non-voters showed up

00:20:02.400 and a lot of non-voters

00:20:03.380 were going conservative.

00:20:04.980 If it's more of like a 67% turnout,

00:20:08.660 it was 63 last time for context,

00:20:10.760 then it's going to be

00:20:12.540 a pretty bit hard knife fight

00:20:14.060 in many parts of the country.

00:20:15.240 So probably won't be covering that

00:20:18.260 for three or four days.

00:20:19.220 I'll be doing campaign updates

00:20:20.400 on what the different campaigns are doing,

00:20:22.280 how they're marketing themselves,

00:20:23.460 what the discourse online is.

00:20:25.500 But yeah, so other than that,

00:20:27.200 I'll talk to you guys later.

00:20:28.920 Thank you for watching.

00:20:30.360 Stay subscribed.

00:20:31.180 Do all that great stuff.

00:20:32.260 Have a good one.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 10, 2025

Carney attacks Pierre Poilievre but makes him sound GREAT!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript