The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - September 09, 2025


Carney Fails as PM - Liberals praise him for running...


Episode Stats

Length

21 minutes

Words per Minute

182.06729

Word Count

3,898

Sentence Count

99

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

9


Summary

Wyatt Claypool talks about Mark Carney running a half-marathon without the media and the liberal propagandists covering it, and why it's a good thing he's not Prime Minister right now. Also, why is it so important that a 60-year-old man can run a marathon?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here.
00:00:02.620 You can tell that Prime Minister Mark Carney isn't doing very well right now
00:00:06.860 because online liberal propagandists and the media
00:00:10.540 have to cover increasingly frivolous stories about the man
00:00:14.220 in order to say something nice.
00:00:16.660 And that is what has led us to today
00:00:18.940 with Mark Carney being praised for running a half marathon.
00:00:23.460 Apparently this is all we have left to justify why he is better
00:00:26.780 than Federal Conservative Party leader Pierre Polyev.
00:00:30.160 Honestly, Polyev and the Conservatives have been so effective
00:00:33.680 at pushing the Liberals off of certain issues over the past few months
00:00:37.180 that Polyev should just make a play for Prime Minister right now,
00:00:41.040 just demand that Carney let him be Prime Minister,
00:00:43.340 and there's a good chance he might do it.
00:00:45.200 Carney seems to have like no will to live anymore politically.
00:00:48.720 You know, Polyev criticizes him on an EV mandate for two months
00:00:52.020 and then he suddenly drops it.
00:00:53.720 Donald Trump puts pressure on him over the digital services tax
00:00:57.180 for about five minutes and he drops it.
00:00:59.240 It's been kind of wild watching just the Liberals
00:01:02.840 constantly pivoting to something,
00:01:05.100 pretending there this is the hill that they're going to die on,
00:01:07.420 and then retreating to somewhere else.
00:01:09.820 But you have this here, this person, John Beggs,
00:01:12.300 and it's been spammed all over social media
00:01:14.440 since it was reported on last night.
00:01:16.200 Oh my goodness, Mark Carney showed up to a marathon
00:01:18.120 and dazzled the crowds because they didn't know he was going to be there.
00:01:21.060 And I'm going to assume he actually did run the half marathon.
00:01:23.880 Good for him.
00:01:24.820 It's good to be healthy.
00:01:26.360 You know, healthier than I am.
00:01:28.120 But you have all these people constantly posting about what doesn't matter.
00:01:32.640 And I look at this, I'm like, well, where is the budget?
00:01:35.560 Why do we have a massive deficit?
00:01:37.960 Why did he have to drop the EV mandate?
00:01:40.700 Why is he like putting a pause on it?
00:01:42.280 I thought it was something he believed in so much.
00:01:44.700 Why are we still running a massive industrial carbon tax
00:01:47.660 and putting a carbon border adjustment
00:01:49.940 on countries that don't have a carbon tax
00:01:52.440 when we're supposedly trying to grow our economy right now?
00:01:55.580 Like, I could just keep going down the list.
00:01:57.740 You know, the Air Canada deal that's already fallen through
00:02:00.080 and the Liberal government doesn't seem to actually be trying
00:02:02.520 to quarterback that one across the finish line.
00:02:06.000 But know what?
00:02:07.120 At least Mark Carney is getting over the finish line
00:02:10.060 at this random marathon.
00:02:12.240 And you have this guy, John Beggs, here saying,
00:02:14.400 one man, 60 years old, raring to go, one man, 46, spent.
00:02:19.580 It's like, okay, well, what's Mark Carney accomplished?
00:02:23.980 If he's raring to go,
00:02:25.620 why did we have to have him go on an extended summer vacation
00:02:28.940 getting nothing done in Parliament
00:02:30.440 other than a symbolic Major Projects Act
00:02:33.560 that doesn't actually seem to have
00:02:34.940 any major projects attached to it?
00:02:37.120 In fact, there's like a leaked list of the projects
00:02:39.860 that the government may focus on.
00:02:41.460 And even like Doug Ford's upset about the list of projects
00:02:44.700 because it sounds like it hasn't been fully reported yet.
00:02:47.800 That's very unambitious.
00:02:49.540 And of course, you have Laura Babcock here saying,
00:02:52.540 you've got to admit, Carney is impressive.
00:02:55.420 Okay, I guess if we need a 60-year-old man
00:02:58.060 who can run a marathon, I will contact Mark Carney.
00:03:01.420 And it wasn't like this is just something
00:03:03.160 a few people reported on.
00:03:04.400 It was reported by CTV News and other outlets
00:03:07.680 as like this, wow, look at Mark Carney
00:03:10.020 running out there in the woods.
00:03:11.900 He can stay there in the woods.
00:03:13.400 That would make me happy.
00:03:14.660 But I'm not exactly happy that our prime minister
00:03:17.500 is, you know, screwing around
00:03:19.980 and he still hasn't accomplished anything
00:03:22.140 that will actually help the economy.
00:03:23.880 Again, other countries are building port terminals
00:03:26.720 for LNG importation in like 170 days.
00:03:31.920 And in over 180 days, we still haven't actually
00:03:35.060 gotten anything substantial from this government
00:03:37.080 since Mark Carney became the prime minister,
00:03:39.460 not since the election, of course.
00:03:40.920 But you'll have this stuff that has like 4,300 likes,
00:03:44.420 631 retweets and quote tweets.
00:03:48.280 This stuff is being pushed hard.
00:03:51.140 And people are copying and pasting
00:03:52.880 what this Charles Kropolek guy had posted.
00:03:57.100 Other people reposting the same thing.
00:03:59.180 Mark Carney, our 60-year-old prime minister,
00:04:01.240 casually and without media fanfare,
00:04:03.520 took part in the marathon,
00:04:04.820 in the marathon Halliburton Forest Trail race
00:04:08.240 yesterday in Ontario.
00:04:10.300 Out of 120 runners in the 26-kilometer race,
00:04:13.520 Prime Minister Carney finished 58th
00:04:15.380 with a time of just over 3 hours and 45 minutes.
00:04:18.260 Okay, can he, you know, lower taxes?
00:04:22.760 Can he do anything like that?
00:04:24.960 Like we even have him today in front of the media
00:04:28.180 in the Maritimes,
00:04:29.460 just having a simple question asked to him
00:04:32.180 of how are we going to pay for all of the subsidies
00:04:34.420 that you're pouring on our industries
00:04:36.100 in order to keep them afloat?
00:04:37.500 Again, we could just cut taxes
00:04:38.940 so that we were actually competitive.
00:04:40.600 But in the current tariff crisis,
00:04:43.080 the current trade crisis,
00:04:44.140 we're just going to throw money at different industries
00:04:46.620 and hope that they don't pass away
00:04:48.140 by the time the trade situation is sorted out,
00:04:51.420 which, again, the man who's raring to go
00:04:54.600 didn't seem to want to actually rare,
00:04:56.580 you know, wasn't really raring
00:04:58.680 to actually get a trade deal signed.
00:05:00.500 But here is a reporter from the CBC
00:05:02.660 asking him a very basic question
00:05:05.180 and then Mark Carney turning into a just um-and-ah machine
00:05:10.420 talking about completely nothing
00:05:11.900 in order to get through the question.
00:05:15.040 Question, go ahead.
00:05:15.840 Heather Gillis with CBC News.
00:05:17.980 Prime Minister, how do you plan to pay
00:05:19.760 for these support measures?
00:05:20.880 Will it be adding to the deficit
00:05:22.080 or through cutting programs?
00:05:24.800 So the measures we're taking,
00:05:27.280 the Strategic Response Fund,
00:05:29.840 liquidity so that businesses can pivot to grow.
00:05:33.240 What I'm talking about principally today,
00:05:35.040 the Regional Tariff Response Initiative,
00:05:36.860 $80 million for Atlantic Canadian
00:05:39.280 small and medium-sized enterprises
00:05:40.680 so they can invest in the future.
00:05:43.000 Those are investments.
00:05:43.760 Those are proud investments.
00:05:45.440 They're ambition investments for the future.
00:05:48.260 Okay.
00:05:48.880 He just, yeah, we understand that.
00:05:51.020 Now, how are you going to pay for all this random stuff?
00:05:54.540 Because he also, sometimes the support isn't even very much
00:05:58.000 because we don't really even have much capacity left
00:06:00.320 to spend more.
00:06:01.340 Again, where are the big corporate tax cuts
00:06:03.660 so that our businesses can out-compete American
00:06:06.740 and Chinese and European firms?
00:06:09.140 We keep talking about like elbows up.
00:06:11.320 We keep talking about how we want to support Canadian industry,
00:06:14.120 but we're not supporting them.
00:06:15.700 We're subsidizing them,
00:06:16.760 which is like putting them on life support.
00:06:18.260 And what the government is going to do
00:06:20.300 and what we're in the process for the next budget
00:06:22.480 is focusing on reducing waste,
00:06:25.680 reducing unnecessary federal spending,
00:06:28.560 reducing the duplication in federal spending,
00:06:30.920 becoming more efficient in federal spending
00:06:32.680 so that we have the room,
00:06:34.560 we have the force to support our businesses
00:06:36.960 so they can invest for the future.
00:06:38.660 That's what we're doing.
00:06:39.720 And a key message from today
00:06:41.200 is we're doing that
00:06:42.760 and we'll be working with the province of Newfoundland
00:06:45.140 and Labrador on major projects in energy,
00:06:48.320 clean and conventional energy, for example.
00:06:51.620 We're also working with the smallest businesses
00:06:53.760 in Newfoundland and Labrador
00:06:55.200 so that they can all invest for a brighter-
00:06:57.240 Okay, that's not an answer.
00:06:59.420 The closest he got to an answer
00:07:00.800 was saying that we are going to attempt
00:07:02.400 to get rid of duplicate spending
00:07:05.220 and make our departments more efficient
00:07:06.920 so maybe we can find the money for this.
00:07:08.980 It's like the major projects thing.
00:07:11.360 The other day, he just announces,
00:07:12.900 oh, hey, we have a big major project announcement next week.
00:07:16.580 This is a couple weeks ago.
00:07:18.520 And then when the time came along
00:07:20.180 to make the announcement,
00:07:21.300 what's the announcement?
00:07:22.200 Was it a new pipeline?
00:07:23.320 Is it a new mine?
00:07:24.320 Are we going to just do a blanket approval
00:07:26.200 in a certain region for projects?
00:07:28.300 Nah, we're going to open up an office
00:07:30.140 that's going to continue to talk about
00:07:34.140 and speculate about potential major projects.
00:07:36.380 Same thing with the spending issue.
00:07:38.520 You can't find areas of government
00:07:40.540 that you want to cut yet.
00:07:42.060 I know he's announced
00:07:43.620 and there's been rumors
00:07:44.760 that he may try and cut away
00:07:46.100 some DEI spending here and there.
00:07:48.420 But my thing is just do it.
00:07:50.160 Just announce.
00:07:51.480 As soon as you come in,
00:07:52.300 you can't find worthless departments
00:07:54.400 that you can just eliminate
00:07:55.200 and say, hey, good.
00:07:56.240 Hey, look, guys,
00:07:56.800 I just saved us $2 billion.
00:07:58.160 I'm going to get rid of this ESG initiative.
00:08:00.280 I'm going to get rid of this DEI initiative.
00:08:01.900 Another $5 billion right there.
00:08:03.880 And you're like slowly
00:08:05.000 nickel and diming your way down.
00:08:06.400 The fact that we haven't heard anything yet
00:08:07.960 sounds like it's all still in the back burner
00:08:09.860 and we might just start considering it
00:08:11.920 into the future.
00:08:12.980 Because right now,
00:08:13.920 the time horizon for the efficiency
00:08:16.220 is like the next three years
00:08:18.080 that ministries have to figure out
00:08:19.880 how to reduce spending
00:08:20.820 by like 10 to 15%.
00:08:22.240 And that's ambitious, actually.
00:08:23.840 Just cut it that much.
00:08:24.840 I would love to see it.
00:08:26.360 But again,
00:08:27.560 it feels like the time horizon
00:08:28.840 is more so like,
00:08:29.600 well, we'll consider cutting it
00:08:31.260 by the third year,
00:08:32.640 which means we're not going to do it
00:08:34.200 because we're probably going to be
00:08:35.520 in a new election
00:08:36.520 in the next year or two.
00:08:38.940 So it's always just promises
00:08:40.640 of stuff that we might do
00:08:41.860 at some point,
00:08:42.680 but, you know,
00:08:43.680 don't keep hold us to it
00:08:45.020 because we're not going to be that fast.
00:08:47.380 And here's another,
00:08:48.920 even we have former liberal
00:08:50.440 deputy prime ministers
00:08:52.160 or a former liberal deputy prime minister,
00:08:56.340 John Manley,
00:08:57.300 who came out to say
00:08:59.700 that we actually do need
00:09:00.740 to be getting rid of things
00:09:01.660 like Bill C-48 and C-69,
00:09:03.460 the same things
00:09:04.720 that Pierre Polyev
00:09:05.740 is calling for
00:09:06.500 in his Sovereignty Act
00:09:08.100 that would basically
00:09:09.280 massively cut down
00:09:10.660 on regulations
00:09:11.420 holding back energy projects
00:09:13.360 and other natural resource projects.
00:09:15.580 And the liberals
00:09:16.120 were making fun of him.
00:09:17.380 It's like,
00:09:17.680 oh, of course,
00:09:18.320 the conservatives thinks
00:09:19.560 that we can grow the economy
00:09:20.880 but throw away the planet
00:09:22.520 by not addressing climate change.
00:09:25.480 And you have former liberals
00:09:26.480 saying,
00:09:26.800 but, you know,
00:09:27.120 they're kind of right.
00:09:28.840 The other thing
00:09:29.760 they're going to have to do
00:09:30.940 if they want,
00:09:31.560 for example,
00:09:32.100 pipelines to be built
00:09:33.140 is they're going to have to deal
00:09:34.080 with some of the constraints
00:09:35.260 that exist on the supply side
00:09:37.960 in the oil and gas sector
00:09:40.060 supply being necessary
00:09:42.740 in order to have a pipeline.
00:09:44.600 It's one thing
00:09:45.200 to build a pipeline
00:09:45.900 but you got to have something in it
00:09:47.000 otherwise it's not going to be economic
00:09:48.320 and that means
00:09:48.980 some of the emissions caps
00:09:51.060 and other reductions
00:09:52.260 that have been in the law
00:09:54.860 for the last number of years
00:09:56.020 are going to have to be re-examined.
00:09:58.420 And now the funny thing
00:10:00.100 is that Polyev has put himself
00:10:02.080 in a great position
00:10:03.440 where regardless of what
00:10:05.240 Carney does at this point
00:10:06.640 he gets a win out of it
00:10:07.960 and rightfully so in fact
00:10:09.580 because he's basically said
00:10:11.280 taken the right position
00:10:12.260 of saying copy me
00:10:13.340 everything I put out
00:10:14.420 just do it
00:10:15.220 take the credit
00:10:16.040 you know I'm obviously
00:10:17.300 it's still my idea
00:10:18.220 but take the credit
00:10:19.300 just implement it
00:10:20.240 try it out
00:10:20.940 because now Carney's stuck
00:10:22.700 between a rock and a hard place.
00:10:24.500 If he doesn't do it
00:10:25.340 naturally the economy
00:10:26.560 is going to keep failing
00:10:27.740 and if he does do it
00:10:29.340 he's acknowledging
00:10:30.200 that Polyev is right.
00:10:31.800 Now this is a good change
00:10:32.980 from what the conservatives
00:10:33.760 were previously doing
00:10:34.840 before the federal election
00:10:36.020 rather when Mark Carney
00:10:37.840 had basically rescinded
00:10:39.900 the consumer carbon tax
00:10:41.820 the conservatives
00:10:42.600 tried to do too much
00:10:43.820 fussing around
00:10:44.440 saying well he didn't
00:10:45.100 really get rid of it
00:10:46.000 he just turned down
00:10:46.840 the rate of it to zero
00:10:47.820 and so it's still around
00:10:49.280 and we're going to campaign
00:10:50.080 on getting rid of it
00:10:50.800 it's like just take the W
00:10:52.140 just take the W
00:10:53.220 and move on
00:10:53.840 because if you kind of like
00:10:54.860 start trying to parse out
00:10:56.280 the nuance of whether it's gone
00:10:58.180 or whether the government
00:10:59.360 still has to pass a bill
00:11:00.400 to get rid of it
00:11:01.100 voters eyes are going to glaze over
00:11:03.120 they don't care
00:11:03.760 it's technically gone
00:11:04.820 for them at the pump
00:11:05.620 so just let it happen
00:11:06.860 and like it's fine
00:11:08.360 to go after the industrial
00:11:09.400 carbon tax now
00:11:10.300 you just don't argue
00:11:11.140 that it is still around
00:11:12.680 in spirit
00:11:13.220 or something like that
00:11:14.240 but the industrial carbon tax
00:11:15.680 and consumer carbon tax
00:11:16.740 were different
00:11:17.260 I think they should both go
00:11:18.620 but that's why
00:11:19.540 but I wouldn't message on it
00:11:21.060 saying like oh no
00:11:21.880 this is secretly
00:11:22.600 still the consumer one
00:11:23.660 but Polly of the other day
00:11:25.460 pointed this out
00:11:26.340 and it is a staggering figure
00:11:28.480 when you look at it
00:11:29.780 of just
00:11:30.180 this is a number
00:11:31.020 that would be headline news
00:11:32.740 all over the United States
00:11:33.800 if it happened to
00:11:34.520 Donald Trump's economy
00:11:35.560 but Polly of here
00:11:36.940 said a few days ago
00:11:37.980 on the 5th
00:11:38.540 and I've already reported
00:11:39.520 on this
00:11:39.940 but it is just again
00:11:40.740 one of those things
00:11:41.340 that you almost have to see
00:11:42.460 a few times
00:11:43.040 to properly digest
00:11:44.260 breaking
00:11:45.240 liberal job loss crisis
00:11:47.380 worsens
00:11:47.880 as 66,000 Canadians
00:11:49.880 lost their jobs
00:11:51.500 last month
00:11:52.040 due to Mark Carney's
00:11:53.380 economic failures
00:11:54.380 a total of 106,000
00:11:56.580 have lost their jobs
00:11:57.800 this summer
00:11:58.280 conservatives will fight
00:11:59.440 for these devastated families
00:12:00.760 and bring back
00:12:01.460 high paying jobs
00:12:02.300 that go to Canadians first
00:12:04.080 and again
00:12:05.340 I just made a video on this
00:12:06.760 Mark Carney
00:12:07.520 could actually reverse
00:12:09.000 the trend in jobs
00:12:10.380 by just slashing
00:12:11.680 both the temporary
00:12:12.540 foreign worker program
00:12:13.780 the student program
00:12:15.040 and the international
00:12:16.340 mobility program
00:12:17.580 international mobility program
00:12:19.260 is in fact bigger
00:12:20.240 than the TFW program
00:12:21.740 and it allows for people
00:12:23.120 to bring spouses
00:12:24.000 with them into Canada
00:12:25.260 just because they work
00:12:26.720 in certain fields
00:12:27.460 or whatever
00:12:27.860 it's just not helping
00:12:29.600 the country at this point
00:12:30.600 we want skilled workers
00:12:31.820 that's perfectly fine
00:12:33.260 bring in skilled people
00:12:34.480 but if someone doesn't
00:12:35.620 even have a high school
00:12:36.520 diploma
00:12:36.980 I don't see the reason
00:12:38.520 why we should be
00:12:39.280 bringing them in
00:12:39.860 as a temporary
00:12:40.440 foreign worker
00:12:41.240 if they're not
00:12:42.340 specifically in industries
00:12:43.640 like agriculture
00:12:44.400 or they're working
00:12:46.080 in retail
00:12:46.740 in seasonal
00:12:48.180 tourism towns
00:12:49.580 that are only open
00:12:50.440 three months a year
00:12:51.200 and I can see
00:12:51.740 why a lot of Canadians
00:12:53.000 wouldn't want those jobs
00:12:54.060 are you really going to
00:12:54.940 uproot from your home
00:12:56.040 for three months
00:12:56.740 to work a job
00:12:57.620 that probably doesn't
00:12:58.300 pay super well
00:12:59.180 and then you have to
00:13:00.200 sustain yourself
00:13:00.860 while you're there
00:13:01.620 and then you're going
00:13:02.900 to have to go home
00:13:03.500 and find something new
00:13:04.320 in three months
00:13:04.800 that's more of a job
00:13:06.280 for people who do live
00:13:07.600 in countries where
00:13:08.780 the economy isn't as good
00:13:10.220 so even though
00:13:10.940 they don't make tons
00:13:11.780 of money at that
00:13:12.780 Canadian job
00:13:13.420 if they bring those
00:13:14.280 those dollars home
00:13:15.560 they're worth a lot more
00:13:16.960 but anyways
00:13:18.540 a few other things
00:13:19.820 I just want to talk
00:13:20.600 about in this video
00:13:21.800 I want to go to
00:13:23.340 this Laura Babcock
00:13:24.180 video because of course
00:13:25.620 I have to talk
00:13:26.100 about Laura Babcock
00:13:26.840 but before we talk
00:13:27.700 about her video
00:13:28.180 oh my goodness
00:13:28.780 I saw her post
00:13:29.980 this just a bit ago
00:13:31.020 which truly shows
00:13:32.840 the liberal mindset
00:13:34.360 of just naysaying
00:13:35.580 conservatives
00:13:36.140 so the National Post
00:13:38.300 put out this very
00:13:39.180 good opinion column
00:13:40.140 that I 100% agree with
00:13:41.760 then the opinion is
00:13:43.380 the Muslim Brotherhood
00:13:44.680 poses an insidious
00:13:46.560 threat to Canadian society
00:13:47.980 absolutely correct
00:13:49.680 the National Post
00:13:50.680 is like political Islamism
00:13:53.560 it is people
00:13:54.420 who are not going to
00:13:55.760 you know
00:13:56.320 plan an attack
00:13:57.500 it's people who are
00:13:58.860 going to try and put
00:13:59.620 pressure on politicians
00:14:01.000 in order so that
00:14:02.380 aspects of Sharia law
00:14:03.840 are implemented
00:14:04.640 or so that maybe
00:14:05.800 there's a blasphemy law
00:14:07.140 one day
00:14:07.700 just a lot
00:14:08.620 it's very much
00:14:09.560 an insidious interest group
00:14:11.540 that's not just advocating
00:14:12.900 for Canadian Muslims
00:14:13.840 which is fine
00:14:14.620 you can have a Canadian
00:14:15.360 Christian group
00:14:15.980 Canadian Jewish group
00:14:16.880 Canadian Hindu group
00:14:17.820 whatever
00:14:18.520 that's okay
00:14:19.160 the Muslim Brotherhood
00:14:20.800 though is
00:14:21.280 quite the political
00:14:22.480 the military arm
00:14:23.820 of the Muslim Brotherhood
00:14:24.820 internationally
00:14:25.440 is literally Hamas
00:14:26.580 when the Muslim Brotherhood
00:14:28.160 took over Egypt
00:14:29.200 when they had enough power
00:14:30.580 they would literally
00:14:31.360 throw people off
00:14:32.340 of buildings
00:14:32.940 if people weren't
00:14:34.300 doing what they wanted
00:14:35.320 they would kidnap
00:14:36.180 people's children
00:14:36.820 and throw them off
00:14:37.800 a one foot drop
00:14:39.060 over and over again
00:14:39.940 because they dared
00:14:41.020 to oppose the Muslim
00:14:42.400 Brotherhood's agenda
00:14:43.680 it's a group
00:14:44.860 where their front groups
00:14:46.360 have a tendency
00:14:47.280 of funneling money
00:14:48.260 towards terror networks
00:14:49.560 around the world
00:14:50.260 you know
00:14:50.780 they're the type
00:14:51.540 of people
00:14:51.820 wearing nice
00:14:52.520 three-piece suits
00:14:53.280 but they're like
00:14:54.520 Hamas
00:14:55.020 you know
00:14:56.060 from the boardroom
00:14:57.020 but Laura Babcock
00:14:59.080 responds to this
00:15:00.820 by saying
00:15:01.280 American mega-owned
00:15:02.660 paper says
00:15:03.440 what?
00:15:04.720 so now apparently
00:15:05.600 respectable liberal
00:15:07.260 Laura Babcock
00:15:07.980 is in favor
00:15:08.780 of the Muslim Brotherhood
00:15:09.880 because
00:15:10.740 the liberal
00:15:12.380 I guess
00:15:12.720 like the conservatives
00:15:14.240 are against it
00:15:15.000 you know
00:15:15.240 conservative papers
00:15:16.080 against it
00:15:16.600 then well
00:15:16.980 they must be good
00:15:17.700 and now
00:15:19.820 I just have to
00:15:20.400 jump over
00:15:21.140 to this video
00:15:23.120 of Laura Babcock
00:15:24.140 having a good one
00:15:26.360 talking about
00:15:27.300 the detrimental
00:15:28.300 effect
00:15:29.140 that mega-conservatism
00:15:30.860 has on society
00:15:32.200 and I play this stuff
00:15:33.720 one because it's funny
00:15:34.860 she needs to take
00:15:35.980 her lithium
00:15:36.420 and I love
00:15:37.140 highlighting these videos
00:15:38.340 I'll stop talking
00:15:39.160 about her once she
00:15:39.780 takes it
00:15:40.240 because then she'll
00:15:41.040 be mellowed out
00:15:41.800 and she won't be
00:15:42.280 as interesting
00:15:42.780 but this is truly
00:15:43.940 the perspective
00:15:44.580 of some of these people
00:15:45.740 everything
00:15:46.760 is 11 out of 10
00:15:47.960 crisis
00:15:48.500 all the time
00:15:49.760 because a conservative
00:15:51.120 exists
00:15:51.760 and they're saying
00:15:52.580 something that people
00:15:53.260 agree with
00:15:53.840 my passion
00:15:55.200 for protecting Canada
00:15:57.580 from all of the evils
00:16:00.100 of the mega movement
00:16:01.840 all of its social
00:16:03.260 regressive policies
00:16:04.200 all of its cruelty
00:16:05.660 towards the other
00:16:07.020 all of its treatment
00:16:08.240 of marginalized people
00:16:09.960 my passion
00:16:11.240 and commitment
00:16:11.620 to that
00:16:12.000 is greater than
00:16:12.900 any affinity
00:16:13.700 or approval
00:16:14.660 I have of our
00:16:15.440 current prime minister
00:16:16.220 or the liberal party
00:16:17.140 or the Canadian government
00:16:18.360 okay but
00:16:20.760 for some reason
00:16:22.160 that includes
00:16:22.780 protecting the
00:16:23.720 Muslim brotherhood
00:16:24.960 you see the problem here
00:16:26.640 I want to stand up
00:16:27.800 for marginalized people
00:16:28.640 well I feel like
00:16:29.840 throwing people
00:16:30.600 off of buildings
00:16:31.500 is marginalizing them
00:16:32.720 like a little bit
00:16:33.920 but these people
00:16:34.760 are so genuinely
00:16:35.860 befuddled
00:16:36.620 in their political
00:16:37.660 like view
00:16:38.620 that they think
00:16:39.440 that just simply
00:16:40.260 opposing the mega thing
00:16:42.060 is good
00:16:43.000 oh it's a mega paper
00:16:44.720 the National Post
00:16:45.360 is a mega paper
00:16:45.940 ergo
00:16:46.520 the Muslim brotherhood
00:16:47.920 must be okay
00:16:48.780 ergo
00:16:49.700 the government
00:16:50.540 in Egypt
00:16:50.940 that eventually
00:16:51.540 the military
00:16:52.180 had to overthrow
00:16:52.820 because of how radical
00:16:53.560 they were
00:16:53.940 them
00:16:54.460 them
00:16:55.000 them
00:16:55.880 trying to float
00:16:56.940 the idea
00:16:57.400 of funding ISIS
00:16:58.280 back when they were
00:16:59.700 in power
00:17:00.020 that was just
00:17:01.140 oh you know
00:17:02.220 it's just
00:17:02.660 it's just
00:17:03.580 those boys
00:17:04.800 over there
00:17:05.460 you know
00:17:05.760 that's just
00:17:06.300 normal stuff
00:17:07.280 that's marginalized
00:17:08.540 people stuff
00:17:09.500 sometimes you just
00:17:10.180 have to sometimes
00:17:10.780 attempt to fund ISIS
00:17:11.900 sometimes
00:17:12.480 sometimes
00:17:13.440 anyways I'm saying
00:17:14.760 sometimes a lot
00:17:15.480 oh my goodness
00:17:17.000 but yeah
00:17:17.700 you wonder
00:17:20.140 you wonder why
00:17:20.920 things aren't going
00:17:21.620 well in this country
00:17:22.540 while at the same
00:17:23.960 time this is many
00:17:24.620 people's views
00:17:25.560 of politics
00:17:27.460 I love
00:17:29.860 I love cartoons
00:17:30.680 like this
00:17:31.100 all these people
00:17:31.780 who think that
00:17:33.060 Mark Carney's
00:17:34.680 absolutely killing it
00:17:35.880 and conservatives
00:17:36.520 are just seething
00:17:37.220 out there
00:17:37.660 we have this
00:17:38.420 whole cartoon here
00:17:39.840 of Mark Carney
00:17:40.460 with various pots
00:17:41.720 that say stuff
00:17:42.300 like Trump
00:17:42.820 EU partnership
00:17:43.960 economic planning
00:17:44.880 budget
00:17:45.360 Gaza
00:17:45.900 major projects
00:17:47.020 office
00:17:47.340 G7
00:17:48.040 first nations
00:17:48.820 planning
00:17:49.540 and you have
00:17:50.560 Polyev over here
00:17:51.480 saying you're not
00:17:52.400 making it right
00:17:53.300 what what is
00:17:54.460 what has Carney
00:17:55.320 done so far
00:17:56.020 on any of this
00:17:57.720 stuff that has
00:17:58.780 actually been good
00:17:59.560 on Gaza
00:18:00.360 apparently we are
00:18:01.580 we were going to
00:18:02.660 recognize a terror
00:18:04.220 state
00:18:04.620 and Mark Carney's
00:18:05.620 already pulled back
00:18:06.320 from that because
00:18:06.820 of how stupid it
00:18:07.580 was
00:18:07.840 our EU partnership
00:18:09.200 doesn't mean
00:18:09.840 anything
00:18:10.380 because the
00:18:11.620 Americans have
00:18:12.180 a better deal
00:18:12.880 than us
00:18:13.280 and trade
00:18:14.140 can at times
00:18:15.040 be zero sum
00:18:15.880 the Americans
00:18:17.260 are getting them
00:18:17.940 to buy over
00:18:18.620 700 billion dollars
00:18:20.100 of energy
00:18:20.740 over the next
00:18:21.360 few years
00:18:21.820 do you think
00:18:22.640 they even have
00:18:23.200 capacity to buy
00:18:24.140 anything from
00:18:24.600 Canada after that
00:18:25.680 they don't
00:18:27.060 our EU
00:18:27.920 our anyone
00:18:29.200 but US
00:18:30.200 trade
00:18:31.060 has gone up
00:18:31.800 about 14%
00:18:32.820 but our trade
00:18:34.200 with the US
00:18:34.940 has gone about
00:18:35.920 down by
00:18:36.440 I believe
00:18:37.880 12%
00:18:38.700 and
00:18:39.740 we only
00:18:40.920 traded
00:18:41.360 20%
00:18:42.060 with anybody
00:18:42.600 but the
00:18:43.140 United States
00:18:43.680 so that
00:18:44.020 going up
00:18:44.380 by 14%
00:18:45.280 means nothing
00:18:46.340 compared to
00:18:47.120 80% of our
00:18:48.400 trade
00:18:48.820 going down
00:18:49.760 by 12%
00:18:51.120 in its amount
00:18:52.160 but apparently
00:18:53.980 Mark Carney's
00:18:54.660 killing it
00:18:55.160 because we
00:18:55.720 can draw
00:18:56.140 cartoons
00:18:56.680 we can AI
00:18:57.320 generate
00:18:57.740 cartoons
00:18:58.300 that say
00:18:59.060 G7
00:19:00.020 on them
00:19:00.380 apparently
00:19:01.160 do you want
00:19:01.580 to see
00:19:02.140 our standing
00:19:02.980 currently
00:19:03.400 in the G7
00:19:04.400 it's all
00:19:05.900 it's all
00:19:06.480 sunny news
00:19:07.140 apparently
00:19:07.540 out there
00:19:08.120 until you
00:19:09.400 actually look
00:19:09.920 at any
00:19:10.240 of the
00:19:10.500 actual numbers
00:19:12.080 so right
00:19:13.440 now
00:19:13.740 in the
00:19:14.660 G7
00:19:15.140 we quite
00:19:16.140 literally
00:19:16.520 have
00:19:17.060 the worst
00:19:18.000 growth
00:19:18.580 I'll go
00:19:20.860 down to
00:19:21.100 the English
00:19:21.400 one that
00:19:21.700 Polly posted
00:19:22.260 and he
00:19:23.480 says
00:19:23.880 build the
00:19:24.820 fastest
00:19:25.180 growing
00:19:25.500 economy
00:19:25.960 in the
00:19:26.420 G7
00:19:26.960 which was
00:19:27.880 a Mark
00:19:28.540 Carney
00:19:28.780 promise
00:19:29.320 the results
00:19:30.360 the US
00:19:31.240 in Q1
00:19:31.900 and Q2
00:19:32.640 has gone
00:19:33.360 up 0.8%
00:19:34.440 France 0.3
00:19:35.540 Japan 0.3
00:19:36.620 UK 0.3
00:19:37.760 Italy went
00:19:38.380 down by 0.1
00:19:39.580 Germany 0.3
00:19:41.040 and Canada
00:19:41.520 has gone
00:19:41.900 down by 0.4%
00:19:44.440 now I've
00:19:45.740 heard that we
00:19:46.260 calculate our
00:19:47.000 numbers a little
00:19:47.780 bit differently
00:19:49.040 than the US
00:19:49.940 and the UK
00:19:50.440 so maybe we're
00:19:51.380 not actually
00:19:51.820 going down
00:19:52.320 as much
00:19:52.920 or we may
00:19:53.680 be even
00:19:54.060 growing slightly
00:19:55.080 but overall
00:19:56.320 the fact that
00:19:57.360 our overall
00:19:58.120 GDP is going
00:19:59.060 down
00:19:59.540 and our
00:20:00.420 per capita
00:20:01.100 GDP has
00:20:01.880 already been
00:20:02.240 going down
00:20:02.660 for multiple
00:20:04.220 quarters
00:20:05.280 is terrifying
00:20:06.720 because the
00:20:07.400 whole promise
00:20:08.320 of mass
00:20:09.040 immigration
00:20:09.560 of temporary
00:20:10.260 foreign workers
00:20:10.980 and international
00:20:12.060 mobility programs
00:20:13.400 was well by
00:20:14.580 bringing more
00:20:15.160 people here
00:20:15.620 you're going
00:20:15.900 to raise
00:20:16.300 productivity
00:20:16.940 and that
00:20:17.700 means the
00:20:18.080 GDP is going
00:20:18.660 to increase
00:20:19.180 well over
00:20:20.340 time we found
00:20:21.120 out that yeah
00:20:22.080 GDP goes up
00:20:23.100 but our GDP
00:20:23.840 per capita
00:20:24.520 starts slipping
00:20:25.320 because of
00:20:26.240 course if you
00:20:26.760 bring a new
00:20:27.780 person into the
00:20:28.440 economy and you
00:20:29.000 shake the
00:20:29.340 quarters out of
00:20:29.940 their pants
00:20:30.380 technically the
00:20:31.580 GDP has
00:20:32.220 increased
00:20:32.780 but over
00:20:34.080 time our
00:20:34.460 GDP per
00:20:35.300 capita was
00:20:36.080 falling and
00:20:37.120 now the
00:20:37.600 GDP is not
00:20:38.300 even going up
00:20:38.960 anymore because
00:20:39.600 we have massive
00:20:40.640 capital flight
00:20:41.620 so we aren't
00:20:43.080 being able to
00:20:43.600 invest in
00:20:44.140 major projects
00:20:45.040 even if our
00:20:45.780 carne approves
00:20:46.420 one we might
00:20:46.980 not have the
00:20:47.360 money to
00:20:47.760 invest to
00:20:48.200 actually make
00:20:48.640 it happen
00:20:49.080 and we're
00:20:50.160 left with
00:20:50.660 just like
00:20:51.020 retail workers
00:20:51.940 at Swiss
00:20:52.460 Chalet
00:20:52.780 serving you
00:20:53.740 up a bunch
00:20:54.140 of food
00:20:54.560 for like a
00:20:55.580 lower wage
00:20:56.220 than most
00:20:56.700 workers
00:20:57.160 than a worker
00:20:58.120 in Canada
00:20:58.540 could do it
00:20:59.000 for that
00:20:59.420 that's the
00:20:59.820 economy
00:21:00.180 it's people
00:21:01.200 on unemployment
00:21:01.940 buying food
00:21:03.700 from people
00:21:04.280 who are here
00:21:05.680 from another
00:21:06.120 country being
00:21:06.920 paid only
00:21:07.640 $11.50 an
00:21:08.460 hour after
00:21:08.960 the government
00:21:09.360 subsidy
00:21:09.880 is compensating
00:21:11.420 the business
00:21:12.000 but anyway
00:21:13.040 so that
00:21:14.500 should be it
00:21:14.920 for this
00:21:15.280 video guys
00:21:16.020 we don't
00:21:16.620 have nice
00:21:17.160 things in
00:21:17.600 this country
00:21:18.080 but at
00:21:18.500 least we
00:21:18.840 have a
00:21:19.680 prime minister
00:21:20.240 who goes
00:21:20.740 and gets
00:21:21.080 his cardio
00:21:21.620 and with
00:21:22.920 that see
00:21:23.640 you guys
00:21:24.040 later