The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Carney Fails as PM - Liberals praise him for running...

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here.

00:00:02.620 You can tell that Prime Minister Mark Carney isn't doing very well right now

00:00:06.860 because online liberal propagandists and the media

00:00:10.540 have to cover increasingly frivolous stories about the man

00:00:14.220 in order to say something nice.

00:00:16.660 And that is what has led us to today

00:00:18.940 with Mark Carney being praised for running a half marathon.

00:00:23.460 Apparently this is all we have left to justify why he is better

00:00:26.780 than Federal Conservative Party leader Pierre Polyev.

00:00:30.160 Honestly, Polyev and the Conservatives have been so effective

00:00:33.680 at pushing the Liberals off of certain issues over the past few months

00:00:37.180 that Polyev should just make a play for Prime Minister right now,

00:00:41.040 just demand that Carney let him be Prime Minister,

00:00:43.340 and there's a good chance he might do it.

00:00:45.200 Carney seems to have like no will to live anymore politically.

00:00:48.720 You know, Polyev criticizes him on an EV mandate for two months

00:00:52.020 and then he suddenly drops it.

00:00:53.720 Donald Trump puts pressure on him over the digital services tax

00:00:57.180 for about five minutes and he drops it.

00:00:59.240 It's been kind of wild watching just the Liberals

00:01:02.840 constantly pivoting to something,

00:01:05.100 pretending there this is the hill that they're going to die on,

00:01:07.420 and then retreating to somewhere else.

00:01:09.820 But you have this here, this person, John Beggs,

00:01:12.300 and it's been spammed all over social media

00:01:14.440 since it was reported on last night.

00:01:16.200 Oh my goodness, Mark Carney showed up to a marathon

00:01:18.120 and dazzled the crowds because they didn't know he was going to be there.

00:01:21.060 And I'm going to assume he actually did run the half marathon.

00:01:23.880 Good for him.

00:01:24.820 It's good to be healthy.

00:01:26.360 You know, healthier than I am.

00:01:28.120 But you have all these people constantly posting about what doesn't matter.

00:01:32.640 And I look at this, I'm like, well, where is the budget?

00:01:35.560 Why do we have a massive deficit?

00:01:37.960 Why did he have to drop the EV mandate?

00:01:40.700 Why is he like putting a pause on it?

00:01:42.280 I thought it was something he believed in so much.

00:01:44.700 Why are we still running a massive industrial carbon tax

00:01:47.660 and putting a carbon border adjustment

00:01:49.940 on countries that don't have a carbon tax

00:01:52.440 when we're supposedly trying to grow our economy right now?

00:01:55.580 Like, I could just keep going down the list.

00:01:57.740 You know, the Air Canada deal that's already fallen through

00:02:00.080 and the Liberal government doesn't seem to actually be trying

00:02:02.520 to quarterback that one across the finish line. 0.87

00:02:06.000 But know what?

00:02:07.120 At least Mark Carney is getting over the finish line

00:02:10.060 at this random marathon.

00:02:12.240 And you have this guy, John Beggs, here saying,

00:02:14.400 one man, 60 years old, raring to go, one man, 46, spent.

00:02:19.580 It's like, okay, well, what's Mark Carney accomplished?

00:02:23.980 If he's raring to go,

00:02:25.620 why did we have to have him go on an extended summer vacation

00:02:28.940 getting nothing done in Parliament

00:02:30.440 other than a symbolic Major Projects Act

00:02:33.560 that doesn't actually seem to have

00:02:34.940 any major projects attached to it?

00:02:37.120 In fact, there's like a leaked list of the projects

00:02:39.860 that the government may focus on.

00:02:41.460 And even like Doug Ford's upset about the list of projects

00:02:44.700 because it sounds like it hasn't been fully reported yet.

00:02:47.800 That's very unambitious.

00:02:49.540 And of course, you have Laura Babcock here saying,

00:02:52.540 you've got to admit, Carney is impressive.

00:02:55.420 Okay, I guess if we need a 60-year-old man

00:02:58.060 who can run a marathon, I will contact Mark Carney.

00:03:01.420 And it wasn't like this is just something

00:03:03.160 a few people reported on.

00:03:04.400 It was reported by CTV News and other outlets

00:03:07.680 as like this, wow, look at Mark Carney

00:03:10.020 running out there in the woods.

00:03:11.900 He can stay there in the woods.

00:03:13.400 That would make me happy.

00:03:14.660 But I'm not exactly happy that our prime minister

00:03:17.500 is, you know, screwing around

00:03:19.980 and he still hasn't accomplished anything

00:03:22.140 that will actually help the economy.

00:03:23.880 Again, other countries are building port terminals

00:03:26.720 for LNG importation in like 170 days.

00:03:31.920 And in over 180 days, we still haven't actually

00:03:35.060 gotten anything substantial from this government

00:03:37.080 since Mark Carney became the prime minister,

00:03:39.460 not since the election, of course.

00:03:40.920 But you'll have this stuff that has like 4,300 likes,

00:03:44.420 631 retweets and quote tweets.

00:03:48.280 This stuff is being pushed hard.

00:03:51.140 And people are copying and pasting

00:03:52.880 what this Charles Kropolek guy had posted.

00:03:57.100 Other people reposting the same thing.

00:03:59.180 Mark Carney, our 60-year-old prime minister,

00:04:01.240 casually and without media fanfare,

00:04:03.520 took part in the marathon,

00:04:04.820 in the marathon Halliburton Forest Trail race

00:04:08.240 yesterday in Ontario.

00:04:10.300 Out of 120 runners in the 26-kilometer race,

00:04:13.520 Prime Minister Carney finished 58th

00:04:15.380 with a time of just over 3 hours and 45 minutes.

00:04:18.260 Okay, can he, you know, lower taxes?

00:04:22.760 Can he do anything like that?

00:04:24.960 Like we even have him today in front of the media

00:04:28.180 in the Maritimes,

00:04:29.460 just having a simple question asked to him

00:04:32.180 of how are we going to pay for all of the subsidies

00:04:34.420 that you're pouring on our industries

00:04:36.100 in order to keep them afloat?

00:04:37.500 Again, we could just cut taxes

00:04:38.940 so that we were actually competitive.

00:04:40.600 But in the current tariff crisis,

00:04:43.080 the current trade crisis,

00:04:44.140 we're just going to throw money at different industries

00:04:46.620 and hope that they don't pass away

00:04:48.140 by the time the trade situation is sorted out,

00:04:51.420 which, again, the man who's raring to go

00:04:54.600 didn't seem to want to actually rare,

00:04:56.580 you know, wasn't really raring

00:04:58.680 to actually get a trade deal signed.

00:05:00.500 But here is a reporter from the CBC

00:05:02.660 asking him a very basic question

00:05:05.180 and then Mark Carney turning into a just um-and-ah machine

00:05:10.420 talking about completely nothing

00:05:11.900 in order to get through the question.

00:05:15.040 Question, go ahead.

00:05:15.840 Heather Gillis with CBC News.

00:05:17.980 Prime Minister, how do you plan to pay

00:05:19.760 for these support measures?

00:05:20.880 Will it be adding to the deficit

00:05:22.080 or through cutting programs?

00:05:24.800 So the measures we're taking,

00:05:27.280 the Strategic Response Fund,

00:05:29.840 liquidity so that businesses can pivot to grow.

00:05:33.240 What I'm talking about principally today,

00:05:35.040 the Regional Tariff Response Initiative,

00:05:36.860 $80 million for Atlantic Canadian

00:05:39.280 small and medium-sized enterprises

00:05:40.680 so they can invest in the future.

00:05:43.000 Those are investments.

00:05:43.760 Those are proud investments.

00:05:45.440 They're ambition investments for the future.

00:05:48.260 Okay.

00:05:48.880 He just, yeah, we understand that.

00:05:51.020 Now, how are you going to pay for all this random stuff?

00:05:54.540 Because he also, sometimes the support isn't even very much

00:05:58.000 because we don't really even have much capacity left

00:06:00.320 to spend more.

00:06:01.340 Again, where are the big corporate tax cuts

00:06:03.660 so that our businesses can out-compete American 1.00

00:06:06.740 and Chinese and European firms?

00:06:09.140 We keep talking about like elbows up.

00:06:11.320 We keep talking about how we want to support Canadian industry,

00:06:14.120 but we're not supporting them.

00:06:15.700 We're subsidizing them,

00:06:16.760 which is like putting them on life support.

00:06:18.260 And what the government is going to do

00:06:20.300 and what we're in the process for the next budget

00:06:22.480 is focusing on reducing waste,

00:06:25.680 reducing unnecessary federal spending,

00:06:28.560 reducing the duplication in federal spending,

00:06:30.920 becoming more efficient in federal spending

00:06:32.680 so that we have the room,

00:06:34.560 we have the force to support our businesses

00:06:36.960 so they can invest for the future.

00:06:38.660 That's what we're doing.

00:06:39.720 And a key message from today

00:06:41.200 is we're doing that

00:06:42.760 and we'll be working with the province of Newfoundland

00:06:45.140 and Labrador on major projects in energy,

00:06:48.320 clean and conventional energy, for example.

00:06:51.620 We're also working with the smallest businesses

00:06:53.760 in Newfoundland and Labrador

00:06:55.200 so that they can all invest for a brighter-

00:06:57.240 Okay, that's not an answer.

00:06:59.420 The closest he got to an answer

00:07:00.800 was saying that we are going to attempt

00:07:02.400 to get rid of duplicate spending

00:07:05.220 and make our departments more efficient

00:07:06.920 so maybe we can find the money for this.

00:07:08.980 It's like the major projects thing.

00:07:11.360 The other day, he just announces,

00:07:12.900 oh, hey, we have a big major project announcement next week.

00:07:16.580 This is a couple weeks ago.

00:07:18.520 And then when the time came along

00:07:20.180 to make the announcement,

00:07:21.300 what's the announcement?

00:07:22.200 Was it a new pipeline?

00:07:23.320 Is it a new mine?

00:07:24.320 Are we going to just do a blanket approval

00:07:26.200 in a certain region for projects?

00:07:28.300 Nah, we're going to open up an office

00:07:30.140 that's going to continue to talk about

00:07:34.140 and speculate about potential major projects.

00:07:36.380 Same thing with the spending issue.

00:07:38.520 You can't find areas of government

00:07:40.540 that you want to cut yet.

00:07:42.060 I know he's announced

00:07:43.620 and there's been rumors

00:07:44.760 that he may try and cut away

00:07:46.100 some DEI spending here and there.

00:07:48.420 But my thing is just do it.

00:07:50.160 Just announce.

00:07:51.480 As soon as you come in,

00:07:52.300 you can't find worthless departments

00:07:54.400 that you can just eliminate

00:07:55.200 and say, hey, good.

00:07:56.240 Hey, look, guys,

00:07:56.800 I just saved us $2 billion.

00:07:58.160 I'm going to get rid of this ESG initiative.

00:08:00.280 I'm going to get rid of this DEI initiative.

00:08:01.900 Another $5 billion right there.

00:08:03.880 And you're like slowly

00:08:05.000 nickel and diming your way down.

00:08:06.400 The fact that we haven't heard anything yet

00:08:07.960 sounds like it's all still in the back burner

00:08:09.860 and we might just start considering it

00:08:11.920 into the future.

00:08:12.980 Because right now,

00:08:13.920 the time horizon for the efficiency

00:08:16.220 is like the next three years

00:08:18.080 that ministries have to figure out

00:08:19.880 how to reduce spending

00:08:20.820 by like 10 to 15%.

00:08:22.240 And that's ambitious, actually.

00:08:23.840 Just cut it that much.

00:08:24.840 I would love to see it.

00:08:26.360 But again,

00:08:27.560 it feels like the time horizon

00:08:28.840 is more so like,

00:08:29.600 well, we'll consider cutting it

00:08:31.260 by the third year,

00:08:32.640 which means we're not going to do it

00:08:34.200 because we're probably going to be

00:08:35.520 in a new election

00:08:36.520 in the next year or two.

00:08:38.940 So it's always just promises

00:08:40.640 of stuff that we might do

00:08:41.860 at some point,

00:08:42.680 but, you know,

00:08:43.680 don't keep hold us to it

00:08:45.020 because we're not going to be that fast.

00:08:47.380 And here's another,

00:08:48.920 even we have former liberal

00:08:50.440 deputy prime ministers

00:08:52.160 or a former liberal deputy prime minister,

00:08:56.340 John Manley,

00:08:57.300 who came out to say

00:08:59.700 that we actually do need

00:09:00.740 to be getting rid of things

00:09:01.660 like Bill C-48 and C-69,

00:09:03.460 the same things

00:09:04.720 that Pierre Polyev

00:09:05.740 is calling for

00:09:06.500 in his Sovereignty Act

00:09:08.100 that would basically

00:09:09.280 massively cut down

00:09:10.660 on regulations

00:09:11.420 holding back energy projects

00:09:13.360 and other natural resource projects.

00:09:15.580 And the liberals

00:09:16.120 were making fun of him.

00:09:17.380 It's like,

00:09:17.680 oh, of course,

00:09:18.320 the conservatives thinks

00:09:19.560 that we can grow the economy

00:09:20.880 but throw away the planet

00:09:22.520 by not addressing climate change.

00:09:25.480 And you have former liberals

00:09:26.480 saying,

00:09:26.800 but, you know,

00:09:27.120 they're kind of right.

00:09:28.840 The other thing

00:09:29.760 they're going to have to do

00:09:30.940 if they want,

00:09:31.560 for example,

00:09:32.100 pipelines to be built

00:09:33.140 is they're going to have to deal

00:09:34.080 with some of the constraints

00:09:35.260 that exist on the supply side

00:09:37.960 in the oil and gas sector

00:09:40.060 supply being necessary

00:09:42.740 in order to have a pipeline.

00:09:44.600 It's one thing

00:09:45.200 to build a pipeline

00:09:45.900 but you got to have something in it

00:09:47.000 otherwise it's not going to be economic

00:09:48.320 and that means

00:09:48.980 some of the emissions caps

00:09:51.060 and other reductions

00:09:52.260 that have been in the law

00:09:54.860 for the last number of years

00:09:56.020 are going to have to be re-examined.

00:09:58.420 And now the funny thing

00:10:00.100 is that Polyev has put himself

00:10:02.080 in a great position

00:10:03.440 where regardless of what

00:10:05.240 Carney does at this point

00:10:06.640 he gets a win out of it

00:10:07.960 and rightfully so in fact

00:10:09.580 because he's basically said

00:10:11.280 taken the right position

00:10:12.260 of saying copy me

00:10:13.340 everything I put out

00:10:14.420 just do it

00:10:15.220 take the credit

00:10:16.040 you know I'm obviously

00:10:17.300 it's still my idea

00:10:18.220 but take the credit

00:10:19.300 just implement it

00:10:20.240 try it out

00:10:20.940 because now Carney's stuck

00:10:22.700 between a rock and a hard place.

00:10:24.500 If he doesn't do it

00:10:25.340 naturally the economy

00:10:26.560 is going to keep failing

00:10:27.740 and if he does do it

00:10:29.340 he's acknowledging

00:10:30.200 that Polyev is right.

00:10:31.800 Now this is a good change

00:10:32.980 from what the conservatives

00:10:33.760 were previously doing

00:10:34.840 before the federal election

00:10:36.020 rather when Mark Carney

00:10:37.840 had basically rescinded

00:10:39.900 the consumer carbon tax

00:10:41.820 the conservatives

00:10:42.600 tried to do too much

00:10:43.820 fussing around

00:10:44.440 saying well he didn't

00:10:45.100 really get rid of it

00:10:46.000 he just turned down

00:10:46.840 the rate of it to zero

00:10:47.820 and so it's still around

00:10:49.280 and we're going to campaign

00:10:50.080 on getting rid of it

00:10:50.800 it's like just take the W

00:10:52.140 just take the W

00:10:53.220 and move on

00:10:53.840 because if you kind of like

00:10:54.860 start trying to parse out

00:10:56.280 the nuance of whether it's gone

00:10:58.180 or whether the government

00:10:59.360 still has to pass a bill

00:11:00.400 to get rid of it

00:11:01.100 voters eyes are going to glaze over

00:11:03.120 they don't care

00:11:03.760 it's technically gone

00:11:04.820 for them at the pump

00:11:05.620 so just let it happen

00:11:06.860 and like it's fine

00:11:08.360 to go after the industrial

00:11:09.400 carbon tax now

00:11:10.300 you just don't argue

00:11:11.140 that it is still around

00:11:12.680 in spirit

00:11:13.220 or something like that

00:11:14.240 but the industrial carbon tax

00:11:15.680 and consumer carbon tax

00:11:16.740 were different

00:11:17.260 I think they should both go

00:11:18.620 but that's why

00:11:19.540 but I wouldn't message on it

00:11:21.060 saying like oh no

00:11:21.880 this is secretly

00:11:22.600 still the consumer one

00:11:23.660 but Polly of the other day

00:11:25.460 pointed this out

00:11:26.340 and it is a staggering figure

00:11:28.480 when you look at it

00:11:29.780 of just

00:11:30.180 this is a number

00:11:31.020 that would be headline news

00:11:32.740 all over the United States

00:11:33.800 if it happened to

00:11:34.520 Donald Trump's economy

00:11:35.560 but Polly of here 1.00

00:11:36.940 said a few days ago

00:11:37.980 on the 5th

00:11:38.540 and I've already reported

00:11:39.520 on this

00:11:39.940 but it is just again

00:11:40.740 one of those things

00:11:41.340 that you almost have to see

00:11:42.460 a few times

00:11:43.040 to properly digest

00:11:44.260 breaking

00:11:45.240 liberal job loss crisis

00:11:47.380 worsens

00:11:47.880 as 66,000 Canadians

00:11:49.880 lost their jobs

00:11:51.500 last month

00:11:52.040 due to Mark Carney's

00:11:53.380 economic failures

00:11:54.380 a total of 106,000

00:11:56.580 have lost their jobs

00:11:57.800 this summer

00:11:58.280 conservatives will fight

00:11:59.440 for these devastated families

00:12:00.760 and bring back

00:12:01.460 high paying jobs

00:12:02.300 that go to Canadians first 1.00

00:12:04.080 and again

00:12:05.340 I just made a video on this

00:12:06.760 Mark Carney

00:12:07.520 could actually reverse

00:12:09.000 the trend in jobs

00:12:10.380 by just slashing

00:12:11.680 both the temporary

00:12:12.540 foreign worker program

00:12:13.780 the student program

00:12:15.040 and the international

00:12:16.340 mobility program

00:12:17.580 international mobility program

00:12:19.260 is in fact bigger

00:12:20.240 than the TFW program

00:12:21.740 and it allows for people

00:12:23.120 to bring spouses

00:12:24.000 with them into Canada

00:12:25.260 just because they work

00:12:26.720 in certain fields

00:12:27.460 or whatever

00:12:27.860 it's just not helping

00:12:29.600 the country at this point

00:12:30.600 we want skilled workers

00:12:31.820 that's perfectly fine

00:12:33.260 bring in skilled people

00:12:34.480 but if someone doesn't

00:12:35.620 even have a high school

00:12:36.520 diploma

00:12:36.980 I don't see the reason

00:12:38.520 why we should be

00:12:39.280 bringing them in

00:12:39.860 as a temporary

00:12:40.440 foreign worker

00:12:41.240 if they're not

00:12:42.340 specifically in industries

00:12:43.640 like agriculture

00:12:44.400 or they're working

00:12:46.080 in retail

00:12:46.740 in seasonal

00:12:48.180 tourism towns

00:12:49.580 that are only open

00:12:50.440 three months a year

00:12:51.200 and I can see

00:12:51.740 why a lot of Canadians 0.88

00:12:53.000 wouldn't want those jobs 0.96

00:12:54.060 are you really going to

00:12:54.940 uproot from your home

00:12:56.040 for three months

00:12:56.740 to work a job

00:12:57.620 that probably doesn't

00:12:58.300 pay super well

00:12:59.180 and then you have to

00:13:00.200 sustain yourself

00:13:00.860 while you're there

00:13:01.620 and then you're going

00:13:02.900 to have to go home

00:13:03.500 and find something new

00:13:04.320 in three months

00:13:04.800 that's more of a job

00:13:06.280 for people who do live

00:13:07.600 in countries where

00:13:08.780 the economy isn't as good

00:13:10.220 so even though

00:13:10.940 they don't make tons

00:13:11.780 of money at that

00:13:12.780 Canadian job

00:13:13.420 if they bring those

00:13:14.280 those dollars home

00:13:15.560 they're worth a lot more

00:13:16.960 but anyways

00:13:18.540 a few other things

00:13:19.820 I just want to talk

00:13:20.600 about in this video

00:13:21.800 I want to go to

00:13:23.340 this Laura Babcock

00:13:24.180 video because of course

00:13:25.620 I have to talk

00:13:26.100 about Laura Babcock

00:13:26.840 but before we talk

00:13:27.700 about her video

00:13:28.180 oh my goodness

00:13:28.780 I saw her post

00:13:29.980 this just a bit ago

00:13:31.020 which truly shows

00:13:32.840 the liberal mindset

00:13:34.360 of just naysaying

00:13:35.580 conservatives

00:13:36.140 so the National Post

00:13:38.300 put out this very

00:13:39.180 good opinion column

00:13:40.140 that I 100% agree with

00:13:41.760 then the opinion is

00:13:43.380 the Muslim Brotherhood

00:13:44.680 poses an insidious

00:13:46.560 threat to Canadian society

00:13:47.980 absolutely correct

00:13:49.680 the National Post

00:13:50.680 is like political Islamism 0.95

00:13:53.560 it is people

00:13:54.420 who are not going to

00:13:55.760 you know

00:13:56.320 plan an attack

00:13:57.500 it's people who are

00:13:58.860 going to try and put

00:13:59.620 pressure on politicians

00:14:01.000 in order so that

00:14:02.380 aspects of Sharia law

00:14:03.840 are implemented

00:14:04.640 or so that maybe

00:14:05.800 there's a blasphemy law

00:14:07.140 one day

00:14:07.700 just a lot

00:14:08.620 it's very much

00:14:09.560 an insidious interest group

00:14:11.540 that's not just advocating

00:14:12.900 for Canadian Muslims

00:14:13.840 which is fine

00:14:14.620 you can have a Canadian

00:14:15.360 Christian group

00:14:15.980 Canadian Jewish group

00:14:16.880 Canadian Hindu group

00:14:17.820 whatever

00:14:18.520 that's okay

00:14:19.160 the Muslim Brotherhood

00:14:20.800 though is

00:14:21.280 quite the political

00:14:22.480 the military arm

00:14:23.820 of the Muslim Brotherhood

00:14:24.820 internationally

00:14:25.440 is literally Hamas

00:14:26.580 when the Muslim Brotherhood 0.81

00:14:28.160 took over Egypt 0.95

00:14:29.200 when they had enough power

00:14:30.580 they would literally

00:14:31.360 throw people off

00:14:32.340 of buildings

00:14:32.940 if people weren't

00:14:34.300 doing what they wanted

00:14:35.320 they would kidnap

00:14:36.180 people's children

00:14:36.820 and throw them off

00:14:37.800 a one foot drop

00:14:39.060 over and over again

00:14:39.940 because they dared

00:14:41.020 to oppose the Muslim 1.00

00:14:42.400 Brotherhood's agenda

00:14:43.680 it's a group

00:14:44.860 where their front groups

00:14:46.360 have a tendency

00:14:47.280 of funneling money

00:14:48.260 towards terror networks

00:14:49.560 around the world

00:14:50.260 you know

00:14:50.780 they're the type

00:14:51.540 of people

00:14:51.820 wearing nice

00:14:52.520 three-piece suits

00:14:53.280 but they're like

00:14:54.520 Hamas 0.96

00:14:55.020 you know

00:14:56.060 from the boardroom

00:14:57.020 but Laura Babcock 0.98

00:14:59.080 responds to this

00:15:00.820 by saying

00:15:01.280 American mega-owned

00:15:02.660 paper says

00:15:03.440 what?

00:15:04.720 so now apparently

00:15:05.600 respectable liberal

00:15:07.260 Laura Babcock

00:15:07.980 is in favor

00:15:08.780 of the Muslim Brotherhood

00:15:09.880 because

00:15:10.740 the liberal

00:15:12.380 I guess

00:15:12.720 like the conservatives

00:15:14.240 are against it

00:15:15.000 you know

00:15:15.240 conservative papers

00:15:16.080 against it

00:15:16.600 then well

00:15:16.980 they must be good

00:15:17.700 and now

00:15:19.820 I just have to

00:15:20.400 jump over

00:15:21.140 to this video

00:15:23.120 of Laura Babcock

00:15:24.140 having a good one

00:15:26.360 talking about

00:15:27.300 the detrimental

00:15:28.300 effect

00:15:29.140 that mega-conservatism

00:15:30.860 has on society

00:15:32.200 and I play this stuff

00:15:33.720 one because it's funny

00:15:34.860 she needs to take

00:15:35.980 her lithium

00:15:36.420 and I love

00:15:37.140 highlighting these videos

00:15:38.340 I'll stop talking

00:15:39.160 about her once she

00:15:39.780 takes it

00:15:40.240 because then she'll

00:15:41.040 be mellowed out

00:15:41.800 and she won't be

00:15:42.280 as interesting

00:15:42.780 but this is truly

00:15:43.940 the perspective

00:15:44.580 of some of these people

00:15:45.740 everything

00:15:46.760 is 11 out of 10

00:15:47.960 crisis

00:15:48.500 all the time

00:15:49.760 because a conservative

00:15:51.120 exists

00:15:51.760 and they're saying

00:15:52.580 something that people

00:15:53.260 agree with

00:15:53.840 my passion

00:15:55.200 for protecting Canada

00:15:57.580 from all of the evils

00:16:00.100 of the mega movement

00:16:01.840 all of its social

00:16:03.260 regressive policies

00:16:04.200 all of its cruelty

00:16:05.660 towards the other

00:16:07.020 all of its treatment

00:16:08.240 of marginalized people

00:16:09.960 my passion

00:16:11.240 and commitment

00:16:11.620 to that

00:16:12.000 is greater than

00:16:12.900 any affinity

00:16:13.700 or approval

00:16:14.660 I have of our

00:16:15.440 current prime minister

00:16:16.220 or the liberal party

00:16:17.140 or the Canadian government

00:16:18.360 okay but

00:16:20.760 for some reason

00:16:22.160 that includes

00:16:22.780 protecting the

00:16:23.720 Muslim brotherhood

00:16:24.960 you see the problem here

00:16:26.640 I want to stand up

00:16:27.800 for marginalized people

00:16:28.640 well I feel like

00:16:29.840 throwing people

00:16:30.600 off of buildings

00:16:31.500 is marginalizing them

00:16:32.720 like a little bit

00:16:33.920 but these people

00:16:34.760 are so genuinely

00:16:35.860 befuddled

00:16:36.620 in their political

00:16:37.660 like view

00:16:38.620 that they think

00:16:39.440 that just simply

00:16:40.260 opposing the mega thing

00:16:42.060 is good

00:16:43.000 oh it's a mega paper

00:16:44.720 the National Post

00:16:45.360 is a mega paper

00:16:45.940 ergo

00:16:46.520 the Muslim brotherhood

00:16:47.920 must be okay

00:16:48.780 ergo

00:16:49.700 the government

00:16:50.540 in Egypt

00:16:50.940 that eventually

00:16:51.540 the military

00:16:52.180 had to overthrow

00:16:52.820 because of how radical

00:16:53.560 they were

00:16:53.940 them

00:16:54.460 them

00:16:55.000 them

00:16:55.880 trying to float

00:16:56.940 the idea

00:16:57.400 of funding ISIS

00:16:58.280 back when they were

00:16:59.700 in power

00:17:00.020 that was just

00:17:01.140 oh you know

00:17:02.220 it's just

00:17:02.660 it's just

00:17:03.580 those boys

00:17:04.800 over there

00:17:05.460 you know

00:17:05.760 that's just

00:17:06.300 normal stuff

00:17:07.280 that's marginalized

00:17:08.540 people stuff

00:17:09.500 sometimes you just

00:17:10.180 have to sometimes

00:17:10.780 attempt to fund ISIS

00:17:11.900 sometimes

00:17:12.480 sometimes

00:17:13.440 anyways I'm saying

00:17:14.760 sometimes a lot

00:17:15.480 oh my goodness

00:17:17.000 but yeah

00:17:17.700 you wonder

00:17:20.140 you wonder why

00:17:20.920 things aren't going

00:17:21.620 well in this country

00:17:22.540 while at the same

00:17:23.960 time this is many

00:17:24.620 people's views

00:17:25.560 of politics

00:17:27.460 I love

00:17:29.860 I love cartoons

00:17:30.680 like this

00:17:31.100 all these people

00:17:31.780 who think that

00:17:33.060 Mark Carney's

00:17:34.680 absolutely killing it

00:17:35.880 and conservatives

00:17:36.520 are just seething

00:17:37.220 out there

00:17:37.660 we have this

00:17:38.420 whole cartoon here

00:17:39.840 of Mark Carney

00:17:40.460 with various pots

00:17:41.720 that say stuff

00:17:42.300 like Trump

00:17:42.820 EU partnership

00:17:43.960 economic planning

00:17:44.880 budget

00:17:45.360 Gaza

00:17:45.900 major projects

00:17:47.020 office

00:17:47.340 G7

00:17:48.040 first nations

00:17:48.820 planning

00:17:49.540 and you have

00:17:50.560 Polyev over here

00:17:51.480 saying you're not

00:17:52.400 making it right

00:17:53.300 what what is

00:17:54.460 what has Carney

00:17:55.320 done so far

00:17:56.020 on any of this

00:17:57.720 stuff that has

00:17:58.780 actually been good

00:17:59.560 on Gaza

00:18:00.360 apparently we are

00:18:01.580 we were going to

00:18:02.660 recognize a terror

00:18:04.220 state

00:18:04.620 and Mark Carney's

00:18:05.620 already pulled back

00:18:06.320 from that because

00:18:06.820 of how stupid it

00:18:07.580 was

00:18:07.840 our EU partnership

00:18:09.200 doesn't mean

00:18:09.840 anything

00:18:10.380 because the

00:18:11.620 Americans have 0.78

00:18:12.180 a better deal

00:18:12.880 than us

00:18:13.280 and trade

00:18:14.140 can at times

00:18:15.040 be zero sum

00:18:15.880 the Americans

00:18:17.260 are getting them

00:18:17.940 to buy over

00:18:18.620 700 billion dollars

00:18:20.100 of energy

00:18:20.740 over the next

00:18:21.360 few years

00:18:21.820 do you think

00:18:22.640 they even have

00:18:23.200 capacity to buy

00:18:24.140 anything from

00:18:24.600 Canada after that

00:18:25.680 they don't

00:18:27.060 our EU

00:18:27.920 our anyone

00:18:29.200 but US

00:18:30.200 trade

00:18:31.060 has gone up

00:18:31.800 about 14%

00:18:32.820 but our trade

00:18:34.200 with the US

00:18:34.940 has gone about

00:18:35.920 down by

00:18:36.440 I believe

00:18:37.880 12%

00:18:38.700 and

00:18:39.740 we only

00:18:40.920 traded

00:18:41.360 20%

00:18:42.060 with anybody

00:18:42.600 but the

00:18:43.140 United States

00:18:43.680 so that

00:18:44.020 going up

00:18:44.380 by 14%

00:18:45.280 means nothing

00:18:46.340 compared to

00:18:47.120 80% of our

00:18:48.400 trade

00:18:48.820 going down

00:18:49.760 by 12%

00:18:51.120 in its amount

00:18:52.160 but apparently

00:18:53.980 Mark Carney's

00:18:54.660 killing it

00:18:55.160 because we

00:18:55.720 can draw

00:18:56.140 cartoons

00:18:56.680 we can AI

00:18:57.320 generate

00:18:57.740 cartoons

00:18:58.300 that say

00:18:59.060 G7

00:19:00.020 on them

00:19:00.380 apparently

00:19:01.160 do you want

00:19:01.580 to see

00:19:02.140 our standing

00:19:02.980 currently

00:19:03.400 in the G7

00:19:04.400 it's all

00:19:05.900 it's all

00:19:06.480 sunny news

00:19:07.140 apparently

00:19:07.540 out there

00:19:08.120 until you

00:19:09.400 actually look

00:19:09.920 at any

00:19:10.240 of the

00:19:10.500 actual numbers

00:19:12.080 so right

00:19:13.440 now

00:19:13.740 in the

00:19:14.660 G7

00:19:15.140 we quite

00:19:16.140 literally

00:19:16.520 have

00:19:17.060 the worst

00:19:18.000 growth

00:19:18.580 I'll go

00:19:20.860 down to

00:19:21.100 the English

00:19:21.400 one that

00:19:21.700 Polly posted

00:19:22.260 and he

00:19:23.480 says

00:19:23.880 build the

00:19:24.820 fastest

00:19:25.180 growing

00:19:25.500 economy

00:19:25.960 in the

00:19:26.420 G7

00:19:26.960 which was

00:19:27.880 a Mark

00:19:28.540 Carney

00:19:28.780 promise

00:19:29.320 the results

00:19:30.360 the US

00:19:31.240 in Q1

00:19:31.900 and Q2

00:19:32.640 has gone

00:19:33.360 up 0.8%

00:19:34.440 France 0.3

00:19:35.540 Japan 0.3

00:19:36.620 UK 0.3

00:19:37.760 Italy went

00:19:38.380 down by 0.1

00:19:39.580 Germany 0.3

00:19:41.040 and Canada

00:19:41.520 has gone

00:19:41.900 down by 0.4%

00:19:44.440 now I've

00:19:45.740 heard that we

00:19:46.260 calculate our

00:19:47.000 numbers a little

00:19:47.780 bit differently

00:19:49.040 than the US

00:19:49.940 and the UK

00:19:50.440 so maybe we're

00:19:51.380 not actually

00:19:51.820 going down

00:19:52.320 as much

00:19:52.920 or we may

00:19:53.680 be even

00:19:54.060 growing slightly

00:19:55.080 but overall

00:19:56.320 the fact that

00:19:57.360 our overall

00:19:58.120 GDP is going

00:19:59.060 down

00:19:59.540 and our

00:20:00.420 per capita

00:20:01.100 GDP has

00:20:01.880 already been

00:20:02.240 going down

00:20:02.660 for multiple

00:20:04.220 quarters

00:20:05.280 is terrifying

00:20:06.720 because the

00:20:07.400 whole promise

00:20:08.320 of mass

00:20:09.040 immigration

00:20:09.560 of temporary

00:20:10.260 foreign workers

00:20:10.980 and international

00:20:12.060 mobility programs

00:20:13.400 was well by

00:20:14.580 bringing more

00:20:15.160 people here

00:20:15.620 you're going

00:20:15.900 to raise

00:20:16.300 productivity

00:20:16.940 and that

00:20:17.700 means the

00:20:18.080 GDP is going

00:20:18.660 to increase

00:20:19.180 well over

00:20:20.340 time we found

00:20:21.120 out that yeah

00:20:22.080 GDP goes up

00:20:23.100 but our GDP

00:20:23.840 per capita

00:20:24.520 starts slipping

00:20:25.320 because of

00:20:26.240 course if you

00:20:26.760 bring a new

00:20:27.780 person into the

00:20:28.440 economy and you

00:20:29.000 shake the

00:20:29.340 quarters out of

00:20:29.940 their pants 0.95

00:20:30.380 technically the

00:20:31.580 GDP has

00:20:32.220 increased

00:20:32.780 but over

00:20:34.080 time our

00:20:34.460 GDP per

00:20:35.300 capita was

00:20:36.080 falling and

00:20:37.120 now the

00:20:37.600 GDP is not

00:20:38.300 even going up

00:20:38.960 anymore because

00:20:39.600 we have massive

00:20:40.640 capital flight

00:20:41.620 so we aren't

00:20:43.080 being able to

00:20:43.600 invest in

00:20:44.140 major projects

00:20:45.040 even if our

00:20:45.780 carne approves

00:20:46.420 one we might

00:20:46.980 not have the

00:20:47.360 money to

00:20:47.760 invest to

00:20:48.200 actually make

00:20:48.640 it happen

00:20:49.080 and we're

00:20:50.160 left with

00:20:50.660 just like

00:20:51.020 retail workers

00:20:51.940 at Swiss

00:20:52.460 Chalet

00:20:52.780 serving you

00:20:53.740 up a bunch

00:20:54.140 of food

00:20:54.560 for like a

00:20:55.580 lower wage

00:20:56.220 than most

00:20:56.700 workers

00:20:57.160 than a worker

00:20:58.120 in Canada

00:20:58.540 could do it

00:20:59.000 for that

00:20:59.420 that's the

00:20:59.820 economy

00:21:00.180 it's people

00:21:01.200 on unemployment

00:21:01.940 buying food

00:21:03.700 from people

00:21:04.280 who are here

00:21:05.680 from another

00:21:06.120 country being

00:21:06.920 paid only

00:21:07.640 $11.50 an

00:21:08.460 hour after

00:21:08.960 the government

00:21:09.360 subsidy

00:21:09.880 is compensating

00:21:11.420 the business

00:21:12.000 but anyway

00:21:13.040 so that

00:21:14.500 should be it

00:21:14.920 for this

00:21:15.280 video guys

00:21:16.020 we don't

00:21:16.620 have nice

00:21:17.160 things in

00:21:17.600 this country

00:21:18.080 but at

00:21:18.500 least we

00:21:18.840 have a

00:21:19.680 prime minister

00:21:20.240 who goes

00:21:20.740 and gets

00:21:21.080 his cardio

00:21:21.620 and with

00:21:22.920 that see

00:21:23.640 you guys

00:21:24.040 later

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - September 09, 2025

Carney Fails as PM - Liberals praise him for running...

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript