The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Carney Liberals caught in Awkward position on multiple fronts!

00:00:00.160 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. As the title of this video implies, we are going to be taking a bit of a tour through multiple areas of public policy where Mark Carney's liberal government are stuck between a rock and a hard place.

00:00:15.360 Either they overpromised and now they cannot deliver, or because of a certain faction of their base, they're having to say things that are then going to alienate other Canadians from voting liberal in the future.

00:00:26.640 So, let's take it from the top, starting off with an issue you guys have heard about before, and that is tariffs.

00:00:35.200 This is an article headline from the Globe and Mail, and they are really trying to front-run the idea that Mark Carney's liberals are being forced into having a tariff applied to Canada after the August 1st deadline.

00:00:49.160 Both because there's probably not going to be a deal made by August 1st, but also because Mark Carney's liberals are probably going to cut a deal where we still have a tariff applied to us.

00:01:00.600 Now, this article I read through the whole thing, they go over the idea that, well, because, you know, Japan and the European Union are going to be left with a 10 or 15% tariff,

00:01:12.360 well, Canadians shouldn't be shocked if Canada ends up with a 15% tariff.

00:01:17.420 But the thing is, Canada has far more leverage, and we have just not been using it whatsoever.

00:01:23.960 I want to cut to another article right here that has Minister Dominic LeBlanc saying that he's encouraged after a meeting with Howard Letnick,

00:01:34.100 and they go on to say that, you know, we have some common interests here, and maybe we can use that in order to get a better deal.

00:01:42.840 And the article quotes a Republican senator from Alaska, Lisa Murkowski, saying that, you know, it would be very bad for the U.S. and Canada to be at odds on trade,

00:01:53.140 because, of course, many states rely heavily on exports into Canada and whatnot, or they rely on imports from Canada.

00:02:01.640 That's all great.

00:02:02.580 But as I was reading this, I keep coming across things like, LeBlanc said complex negotiations are continuing between Canada and the United States,

00:02:11.820 and that he will be returning to Washington next week.

00:02:15.160 Next week?

00:02:16.600 Why?

00:02:17.400 Why next week?

00:02:18.480 I've been seeing clips of Mark Carney hanging out in a Caliwet.

00:02:23.580 Okay, well, why?

00:02:24.960 And he says, quote, Canadians expect us to take the time necessary to get the best deal we can in the interest of Canadian workers,

00:02:34.360 LeBlanc said outside the Dirksen Senate office building in Washington.

00:02:37.660 Quote, so we are only going to be in a position to accept a deal where the prime minister decides that it is the best deal we can get in the interest of Canadian workers in the Canadian economy.

00:02:46.560 Well, if these guys cared about the Canadian economy, they would be putting supply management on the table,

00:02:54.020 saying that we will either eliminate our supply management system or we will heavily modify it in order to allow some U.S. states

00:03:02.880 to be able to send dairy products into Canada, poultry, and the rest.

00:03:08.140 We could easily get down to zero tariff where we actually ended up trying to remove any barriers between the two countries,

00:03:15.380 because we actually do have a lot of leverage on the Trump administration.

00:03:20.020 He, his administration, has a lot of Republican Congress people up for re-election in 2026.

00:03:27.840 Naturally, everyone in the House of Representatives of the U.S. has to run every two years,

00:03:32.440 senators have to run every six years, and of course the president is up for grabs every four years.

00:03:36.940 So Congress is at real risk in some of these border states or any of the states that have heavy exports to Canada.

00:03:44.260 Many states have higher exports into Canada than they have to any other individual state.

00:03:50.360 And so if we basically just make a deal to lower prices heavily in the United States by opening up the barriers fully,

00:03:57.780 we could actually get a lot good out of this.

00:04:00.160 Plus, supply management isn't even good for Canada.

00:04:03.600 The example I've been using recently is the one that Alberta Premier Daniel Smith has been using.

00:04:09.460 Alberta has 12% of the population.

00:04:12.760 We also have a lot of farming.

00:04:14.660 But we only get 7% of the supply management quota given to our province, which is a bit of a problem.

00:04:23.100 It also doesn't make sense because naturally there are more farmers in places like Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba per capita

00:04:30.620 than there are farmers in, you know, provinces like Ontario.

00:04:35.060 Yet Ontario gets an outsized amount of the supply management quota.

00:04:39.920 Quebec obviously does too. 1.00

00:04:41.880 This is a very stupid system. 1.00

00:04:43.720 And in fact, it's a very Soviet system that certain farms are allowed to produce certain amounts, 1.00

00:04:48.960 but you're not a government-favored farmer, so you can't even produce and sell eggs at all,

00:04:53.500 or they will literally come and arrest you, which has happened.

00:04:56.460 And people always kind of forget about this after a few days and like, oh, yeah, that was a crazy Canadian story.

00:05:02.820 Like, we should just take it for granted.

00:05:04.380 It's like, no, that's kind of awful.

00:05:06.780 That would be like a scandal in the United States.

00:05:09.180 That would be a scandal in most countries.

00:05:10.740 And we're like, oh, well, that's just supply management for you.

00:05:13.760 But yeah, so right now, because we will not get rid of supply management,

00:05:17.400 we are now trying to prepare Canadians for taking on a 15% tariff after we sign some sort of deal after August 1st.

00:05:25.940 They're not even, even Lisa Murkowski, Dominic LeBlanc, Mark Carney are all saying,

00:05:30.020 we don't think that we're going to have a deal by August 1st,

00:05:32.340 which means that we are going to pay or we are going to have a tariff applied of 35%

00:05:37.320 to a bunch of our products going into the US.

00:05:40.120 The good thing is it is not going to apply to anything already under the USMCA agreement.

00:05:45.700 So that's good.

00:05:47.400 But still, guys, can we sort something out?

00:05:52.040 Can we stop getting in our own way?

00:05:55.780 Well, now I want to move on to another story.

00:06:00.300 And this one is kind of funny.

00:06:02.460 At the same time, I think a lot of conservatives are getting this story wrong.

00:06:06.320 When I say conservatives, not politicians, but people who are content creators like Mario,

00:06:12.160 that guy on TikTok.

00:06:13.180 I know people think this is a big gotcha on Carney.

00:06:17.200 One, the story isn't even what you think it is.

00:06:20.320 At the same time, even if the story was accurate, even if Mark Carney was doing what people are saying he's doing,

00:06:26.160 it would actually be a good thing.

00:06:27.700 The problem is he's not doing a good thing.

00:06:31.420 So it says here, union claims Prime Minister broke promise to cap, not cut public services.

00:06:40.600 The sub-headline is the Liberal government is looking to cut most departments' budgets by up to 15% over three years.

00:06:47.280 And I'm just going to read a little bit of this for you guys.

00:06:50.840 It says one of the largest unions representing federal public servants says it's gearing up to fight cuts that have been proposed by the Liberal government.

00:06:58.160 The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada, PIPSC, which represents knowledge-based professionals such as government scientists,

00:07:06.180 has taken aim at Prime Minister Mark Carney's plan to find savings in government departments and agencies.

00:07:10.480 Quote, let's not forget, this government ran on a promise to cap, not cut, of caps, not cuts.

00:07:16.900 That promise has been torched, the union said in the news release July 18th.

00:07:21.040 Quote, these aren't caps or efficiencies, they're deep, dangerous cuts that put jobs and critical public services at risk.

00:07:28.880 Now, I want to explain why this story is not what you think it is.

00:07:33.780 If Mark Carney was actually going to reduce the budgets of multiple ministries by 15%, I would be throwing a parade for him because we spend too much.

00:07:44.160 Is Mark Carney actually cutting things in order to, you know, bolster the economic health of the country?

00:07:50.460 No, this should be obvious.

00:07:52.560 We have a $92 billion deficit this year.

00:07:56.440 And by the way, even if the deficit goes down the next year, that's just going to be off of generic economic growth that's reducing it.

00:08:03.320 And it happens even with someone bad as prime minister.

00:08:06.140 The economy is going to grow.

00:08:08.580 And so naturally, your deficit is going to go down unless you add on even more spending than you had the previous year.

00:08:14.520 But we're running a $92 billion deficit, which is the biggest deficit that we've ever had outside of 2020, which was an insane year.

00:08:23.340 But it is the biggest deficit that we've ever had.

00:08:25.940 And we're only cutting in government employees because we're taking that money and we are moving it to another area of government.

00:08:33.280 So I do like pointing and laughing at all the public sector union workers who were going really hardcore against conservatives to only potentially have their useless positions cut.

00:08:45.180 But at the same time, it's not like it's being cut for a good reason.

00:08:49.960 It's being cut so we can spend money elsewhere.

00:08:52.440 I'm fine with increasing defense spending.

00:08:54.520 I also don't trust Mark Carney is going to spend money on defense in the right ways because technically, Trudeau was spending more money than Stephen Harper on defense.

00:09:05.000 But our military got to the point where we had effectively no tanks.

00:09:08.820 Our Navy didn't barely operate.

00:09:11.180 And we didn't have any actual up-to-date jets.

00:09:13.660 We finally signed a deal in the dog days of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's time in office, but we still don't have them.

00:09:22.740 And again, we had a more functional military under Harper because the dollar amount does not equal quality.

00:09:29.720 This is the problem in health care in Canada in general.

00:09:33.520 In British Columbia, I'm going to quickly do a shameless plug for my party, 1BC.

00:09:39.220 Guys, go check out the 1BC website.

00:09:41.100 I'm going to link it in the description below and pin it at the top of the comments.

00:09:44.300 We started because basically the B.C. NDP and B.C. conservatives have found a way of both always being wrong on the issues.

00:09:52.140 They're both in favor of DREPA, both in favor of SOGI, both in favor of crazy amounts of spending, all that stuff.

00:09:56.800 But shameless plug over. 0.95

00:09:58.960 In health care, nobody wants to talk about cutting health care spending in British Columbia because it feels like we're taking dollars away from nurses.

00:10:07.160 It feels like somebody sitting in a bed recovering is going to have like a government agent walk into their room and just start removing things to sell it to in order to take money back from the system.

00:10:17.820 That's not what the system's problem is.

00:10:20.880 If you take money away, that money is not coming out of hospitals.

00:10:23.820 You should be slashing funds from the administration.

00:10:28.760 You don't really even need to take money away.

00:10:30.860 You could just basically cut the spending in B.C. health care through attrition.

00:10:36.020 Just basically don't give it any increases for the next 10 years.

00:10:39.480 And guess what?

00:10:40.160 Health care quality, you could still go up even if you reduce spending.

00:10:43.640 Because the problem right now is you spend a lot on health care, but most of it's not actually going to health care.

00:10:49.220 That's the issue.

00:10:50.000 You need to actually direct the money properly.

00:10:52.360 Harper, with defense, directed the money properly.

00:10:55.680 We actually had jets in the air that were hitting ISIS targets under Harper.

00:11:00.200 And then Justin Trudeau comes in, grounds all of our aircraft.

00:11:04.520 We don't, our forces aren't doing anything.

00:11:06.840 And then he sends winter jackets to people who are being murdered by ISIS. 0.98

00:11:11.480 That was how ridiculous that guy was when he first came into office. 0.99

00:11:16.180 It wasn't like Trudeau eventually became a clown. 1.00

00:11:18.640 He entered as a clown. 0.97

00:11:19.880 He's sending winter jackets to people who are being beheaded. 1.00

00:11:23.060 He's a complete idiot. 1.00

00:11:24.480 But anyways, I want to move on to a clip of this PSAC representative taking issue with Mark Carney. 1.00

00:11:33.520 Again, I like pointing and laughing at these people because a bunch of their own members are going to be screwed over by them being liberal sycophants.

00:11:40.200 At the same time, the unions are still wrong.

00:11:44.040 This is all bloated spending.

00:11:45.860 And Mark Carney is not unbloating the spending.

00:11:48.880 He is reorganizing the bloat.

00:11:50.900 There is still a bloat in the middle of the room.

00:11:52.940 He is just pushing the bloat to the sides.

00:11:55.840 The bloat is less intrusive now, but the bloat still exists.

00:12:00.200 Yes, we may get some more spending for defense, which I prefer over other areas of government.

00:12:05.240 But we're not getting the actual fiscal house in order.

00:12:07.700 And by the way, guys, if a war starts, even though I want more spending, I want a bigger military in Canada, we're really not going to be shouldering any burden, even under Mark Carney's plans.

00:12:18.760 What are we going to spend more on reinforcing bridges that technically counts as war defense spending?

00:12:24.880 We're going to have a few more tanks.

00:12:26.560 We're going to have a few jets, which is not even equivalent to what the U.S. has.

00:12:30.240 I'm fine with defense spending, but let's do it after we get the fiscal house in order, which you can do in the same year, but he doesn't want to do it.

00:12:38.120 But here is the Peace Act president sounding off about this, whining about something that was obvious that eventually a government is going to have to cut some spending.

00:12:49.400 So when I was speaking with an official in the Department of Finance about this yesterday, what they said to me was that this is not intended to be a job cutting exercise.

00:12:57.540 They do want to rebalance the public service.

00:13:00.560 This annual rate of growth of 9 percent is way outstripping GDP and revenue growth and is not seen as sustainable.

00:13:06.800 But the job losses they suggested would largely come through retirement as people leave, the attrition approach.

00:13:15.480 And then the prime minister has talked about using AI to make things more productive and efficient inside government.

00:13:21.520 Do you buy that they can hit targets like this without big job losses?

00:13:25.880 I don't see how they could do that.

00:13:27.480 And the reason why I'm saying this is because who can retire in this economy?

00:13:31.520 Right now, everything, the cost of living has gone up.

00:13:34.560 Can people actually retire with dignity and respect?

00:13:38.500 The answer is no.

00:13:39.520 They need a good job to enable them to do that.

00:13:42.740 In terms of AI, AI is great for tools, for patchwork, for doing calculations.

00:13:48.660 But they can't actually do the job that someone who actually processes does.

00:13:54.680 I might have the biggest fan of AI, but like, goodness, no, you can replace a lot of government jobs with AI.

00:14:00.520 And that's not because AI is fantastic.

00:14:02.240 It's because a lot of government labor is completely unneeded.

00:14:06.120 Again, BC health care has 10 times as many administrators, people in management, people in HR, DEI, than the German health care system is 10 times more like the per capita amount of people who hold those most oftentimes completely worthless jobs are 10 times higher than the German system, where they've made it more efficient so that they only have as many administrators as they really need.

00:14:30.760 Because you don't need somebody writing up reports about everything.

00:14:34.500 Eventually, you're going to find out that if we just stop collecting reports on this, if we stop doing all this reporting on or some like efficiency reports, we can actually be more efficient without doing efficiency reports because we just put more people on the front lines.

00:14:47.580 40% of people who work in administration in BC health care are registered nurses.

00:14:55.320 I know some are probably in their 60s, don't want to go back to front lines, and some people genuinely are holding needed jobs in the administration.

00:15:03.000 But let's say that you can take that 40% and even just return 15%, 20% back to the front lines.

00:15:10.620 No more hospital shutdowns.

00:15:12.400 No more long wait times.

00:15:14.860 You just need to take your money and spend it on the thing that the service is supposed to provide.

00:15:20.320 If you are spending on education, which is another area where we actually overspend, if you're spending on education has 50% of the money not going towards teachers, schools, janitors, principals, you're doing it wrong.

00:15:32.420 This is the problem, too, actually, in Alberta schools.

00:15:35.560 I've heard that 20 years ago, you'd have a principal, a vice principal, maybe a couple other administrators, people doing some management in a school.

00:15:43.640 But these days, you have three vice principals.

00:15:46.160 You have two co-principals.

00:15:47.720 You have 15 office staff or a school that has 500 kids or something like that.

00:15:55.880 And the amount of teachers has not increased.

00:15:58.340 In fact, most of the people who are now the vice principals not teaching classes are teachers.

00:16:03.480 They could just go back to teaching.

00:16:04.900 And everyone's like, oh, my goodness, we have a teacher shortage.

00:16:07.260 Look, no, you have an administrative bloat problem.

00:16:10.060 That's the problem here.

00:16:11.500 But I'll let this person finish up.

00:16:13.340 And so at the end of the day, you're going to hit a shortfall.

00:16:17.860 Do I believe that there's cost savings?

00:16:20.340 Yes, I do.

00:16:21.420 But it doesn't have to be on the backs of public sector workers.

00:16:25.120 I believe that there's a way we can do this through consultation, looking at the contracting out of work that is already being done to save money.

00:16:34.560 And there are solutions that we can actually propose.

00:16:39.580 By the way, the union's not actually going to propose it.

00:16:42.600 There's a she has an idea that there is such a thing as saving money. 0.50

00:16:47.320 She's not going to say where the money can be saved.

00:16:49.520 It just can't be saved on public sector workers.

00:16:51.660 I guarantee you, if you held her down and you found 10 workers and they're like obviously doing nothing all day, it is club fed.

00:17:00.200 They are sitting around playing Tetris, drinking coffee.

00:17:04.180 Their work could be easily either just completely eliminated.

00:17:08.480 Their work doesn't do anything.

00:17:09.900 The reports that they file don't actually benefit anybody.

00:17:13.080 Or it could just be easily replaced by AI.

00:17:15.380 If you brought that to her, I guarantee you she would refuse to say that they need to be fired.

00:17:22.560 At the end of the day, I guess that's her job as a union hack is just to basically say that however many workers we have is not only good, but we probably need even more. 0.68

00:17:33.060 Because the benefit to her is the more people you hire, the more power she has, the more union workers that believe the things that she says. 1.00

00:17:42.840 But yeah, so I'll get back to the some of the details of how they're cutting just to give you a little bit more detail on this.

00:17:50.700 Obviously, we're jumping around, so I'm not being super detailed.

00:17:53.640 On July 7th, Finance Minister Philippe, Francois Philippe Champagne sent letters to ministers asking them to find 15% savings over three years in their departments.

00:18:02.840 He has asked them to come up with savings of 7.5% during the 2026-2027 fiscal year, with an additional 2.5% the year after and 5% in 2028-2029.

00:18:15.100 It isn't clear yet whether there will be widespread layoffs as ministers will have until the end of the summer to propose cuts to their department,

00:18:22.000 but personnel costs such as salaries and benefits make up a significant chunk of department budgets.

00:18:27.860 But again, this whole article doesn't really mention, as it should, that we have a $92 billion deficit, and that's new spending mostly.

00:18:40.240 It's not like it was existing spending that's getting the better of us or whatever, like debt service costs are getting out of control, and so the thing's bloating.

00:18:49.820 It's mostly bloating because of new things Mark Carney wants to spend on.

00:18:52.740 And again, if we do not, going back to the first story, get a trade deal where we basically get tariffs down to nothing, or at least we lower taxes on our side of the border significantly.

00:19:04.440 And I know Mark Carney's saying, we have middle-class tax cuts.

00:19:07.700 Wow, 1% off the rate of taxes under $50,000 when you don't even pay taxes for the first $18,000?

00:19:14.220 Big whoop.

00:19:15.260 I know people want as much money as they can get back from the government as possible.

00:19:18.840 And I will also benefit from that tax cut, but let's be clear, getting $250 bucks back, $350,000 from the government is very paltry.

00:19:28.400 If they actually eliminated the supply management system, we'd probably actually all save more money than even cutting taxes by that much,

00:19:35.240 because the supply management system makes things like chicken and eggs unduly expensive compared to everywhere else on the planet.

00:19:42.020 But anyways, so let's get on to another story, and this is where we're going to go on to a foreign policy story.

00:19:50.620 I gotta say, my goodness, the liberals need to get control of the nutcases in their base who have, like, an irrational hatred for Israel.

00:20:01.940 I'm not saying you have to like Israel.

00:20:03.700 You don't even have to care about it.

00:20:05.020 But, like, Canada doesn't give any money to Israel.

00:20:08.920 And for some reason, we are telling them how to deal with terrorists on their border and constantly nitpicking them all the time.

00:20:16.340 As a country that does not actually, again, do anything to actually protect people from terrorism or doesn't do anything to actually prevent deaths in different countries,

00:20:27.580 Canada didn't do anything about the Druze being murdered right now in Syria.

00:20:30.920 We don't do anything about Yemen.

00:20:32.580 We don't do anything about the Congo.

00:20:34.480 We don't do anything about all the Christians being slaughtered in Nigeria.

00:20:38.080 But for some reason, we're going to tell Israel that it has to let terrorists be involved in distributing aid supplies,

00:20:45.720 which really means they just steal it and give it to their own militants and they don't let the people get it.

00:20:50.320 But here we have Anita Anand, our foreign affairs minister, saying,

00:20:54.240 The suffering of civilians in Gaza is horrific.

00:20:56.780 Together with 25 other partners, Canada's message is clear.

00:21:00.180 The war in Gaza must end now.

00:21:01.660 We call for an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, and full resumption of humanitarian aid, including food. 0.81

00:21:08.080 Okay, well, that's really stupid because Hamas has had every opportunity to release hostages. 0.50

00:21:19.220 It's not like, well, you know, they were going to do it, but then Israel backed away on some problems. 0.98

00:21:25.460 No, Israel's always said, here is the deal, release hostages, and we will have some way of, like, you know, ending the war. 0.51

00:21:32.120 But Hamas doesn't get to stay as the governing force.

00:21:34.680 And you can say, well, that's unfair.

00:21:36.280 They don't get to stay as the governing force.

00:21:38.080 Well, yeah, the whole point is that we will cease fire.

00:21:42.020 You guys can just go slip back into the dark corners of the world, but you guys don't get to be in charge after all of this.

00:21:49.740 You know, we'll let the Palestinian Authority take over or whatever, which seems more than fair because that would be like letting the SS just kind of, you know, leave without having to face military trial. 0.61

00:22:00.280 As long as you stop bothering us, we will have a ceasefire.

00:22:03.780 That is more than generous.

00:22:06.140 But not only is Anita Anand going after them, you will notice that in that tweet, Mark Carney had retweeted it.

00:22:12.760 Mark Carney is also hitting them today himself, saying that somehow, again, they are being very, very bad in some way to the Palestinians, to the people in Gaza.

00:22:23.060 No, they're not.

00:22:26.220 I'll get into a little bit more of the details of what's going on here in a second, but it's really dishonest.

00:22:31.320 Mark Carney says, Canada condemns the Israeli government's failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

00:22:39.340 Israel controls the control of aid distribution must be replaced by comprehensive provision of humanitarian assistance led by international organizations.

00:22:49.240 Many of these are holding significant Canadian funded aid, which has been blocked from delivering to starving civilians.

00:22:55.800 This denial of humanitarian aid is a violation of international law.

00:23:00.560 Canada calls on all sides to negotiate an immediate ceasefire in good faith.

00:23:05.360 We reiterate our calls for Hamas to immediately release all the hostages and for the Israeli government to respect the territorial integrity of the West Bank and Gaza.

00:23:15.920 And then he goes on to talk about a two-state solution. 1.00

00:23:19.620 What an idiot. 1.00

00:23:20.600 The reason why Israel controls aid distribution was before Hamas would hijack aid and would just take it for themselves. 1.00

00:23:31.200 There are videos.

00:23:32.340 Hamas uploads themselves of them executing civilians because they got a hold of aid that they didn't want them to have.

00:23:38.900 Some poor person ended up getting a hold of some rice and Hamas executes them on camera because don't you know that's Hamas's rice? 0.70

00:23:47.600 That is why Israel, who sends in humanitarian aid themselves, has control over aid distribution, which most of it's actually coming from the United States.

00:23:57.640 And the United States has no problem with the control that is being exerted because, again, they understand what's going to happen.

00:24:03.840 It's like if the Red Cross was giving out aid to German civilians and just not caring whether or not the Wehrmacht or the SS was going to get a hold of it.

00:24:12.920 It's obviously a problem. 0.82

00:24:14.380 But Mark Carney is pretending to be ignorant in order to shore up his far left flank because with the collapse of the NDP in the 2025 election, he has now inherited a bunch of NDP crazies. 0.75

00:24:26.880 So he, in a certain sense, now has to act like an NDP crazy, taking issue with things that, if you actually do basic research, is not actually happening. 0.84

00:24:36.520 Not Israel just being mean and not letting people have aid. 0.55

00:24:40.060 In fact, a lot of the news of people starving is complete nonsense.

00:24:44.380 They will take a photo of someone starving in another country and claim it's someone from Gaza.

00:24:48.700 Or you'll see somebody who is legitimately looking like they are starving.

00:24:52.180 But it's because they have a different medical issue and they're being held by their mother who is obviously not starving.

00:25:00.780 It's because of something else.

00:25:01.880 But the thing is, the liberals are allowing for misinformation to go out there.

00:25:05.220 They don't care that they are basically promoting misinformation.

00:25:07.700 They're trying to keep the pro-Hamas side of the left voting liberal and not going back to the NDP.

00:25:14.940 The problem with trying to please those people is they are now going to lose a lot more people who are pro-Israel in Canada.

00:25:21.780 And also, the radicals on the left are probably not even going to be satisfied with what Mark Carney is saying here.

00:25:28.680 And they're going to go back to the NDP anyways when Heather McPherson or Yves Engler ends up becoming the leader.

00:25:35.040 Both people who are just fully pro-terrorist.

00:25:38.280 It's nuts the kind of things that the liberals are doing to themselves right now.

00:25:42.920 But I'm here for it.

00:25:44.060 Again, a rock and a hard place on so many issue fronts.

00:25:49.020 There's probably even more.

00:25:50.080 These are just the three I noticed at the top of the day where the liberals, say, are trying to basically do this really crazy balancing act of pretending that they're fighting for Canadians on the tariffs, but they're not actually doing anything to alleviate the tariffs.

00:26:02.800 Or that they want to seem like they're conservative on fiscal issues and they're making government more efficient, but they're spending $92 billion on – they have a $92 billion deficit.

00:26:16.000 They got the unions mad at them.

00:26:17.440 At the same time, they're not going to get any fiscal conservatives to come over to them because they're not fiscally conservative.

00:26:23.980 This is what I mean.

00:26:25.800 They're doing something to achieve a goal, but at the same time, they're doing something else that undermines the goal, and everyone's going to be rightfully upset with them.

00:26:35.260 But anyways, so that's it for this video, guys.

00:26:38.880 Hopefully, you didn't mind it.

00:26:40.100 Hopefully, it wasn't too much of a ramble.

00:26:42.780 But make sure you like the video if you liked my presentation.

00:26:46.660 Subscribe if you are not yet a subscriber.

00:26:48.920 And leave a comment on what you think about the news of the day.

00:26:52.320 Anyways, so with that, see you guys all later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - July 25, 2025

Carney Liberals caught in Awkward position on multiple fronts!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript