The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Carney Liberals SHAKEN by Poilievre's new speech!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.

00:00:06.120 You can tell that Conservative Party leader Pierre Polyev's speech yesterday

00:00:10.200 on Canada U.S. trade was highly effective, not because Conservatives liked it, of course

00:00:15.980 Conservatives liked it, but because Mark Carney's Liberals hated it, and they are not reacting well

00:00:22.640 at all. They're just firing blindly, because I guess they never expected Polyev's Conservatives

00:00:28.180 to do a proper messaging reset on trade, and reorient the issue back towards the domestic side

00:00:34.540 of how Carney has screwed up so badly that we actually can't negotiate with the U.S. because

00:00:40.140 Carney and Trudeau have made us so weak. So in just a second here, I want to take you through

00:00:45.720 what the Liberal Party has posted on their own social media, as well as panels where Liberal

00:00:51.860 strategists are trying to downplay what Polyev did yesterday. But before I get into it, I just want

00:00:57.780 to remind you guys, if you like the channel, make sure to leave a like on this video, subscribe if

00:01:02.800 you are not yet a subscriber, comment what you think about this issue, and of course, if you want to

00:01:08.440 support the channel, hit the join button below the video and make a small monthly contribution. It

00:01:13.500 allows me to be less reliant on the YouTube algorithm, which is completely wacky these days.

00:01:19.060 Like, some people's channels are doing really well. My channel will sometimes have a great click-through

00:01:23.580 rate on the actual videos where a lot of people are seeing it and clicking on it. But YouTube

00:01:28.080 just apparently doesn't show my videos to anyone. So I'm like barely crawling sometimes over like

00:01:32.520 10-15,000 views after like more than a day of a video being out when that's not typical for this

00:01:38.440 channel at all. But it's just how the YouTube gods work sometimes. Anyways, so I want to start off

00:01:45.220 with this post on the Liberal Party's X account that's trying to go after Polyev, not for what he said

00:01:51.620 in the speech, but what he said in other interviews. And by the way, what he said in

00:01:57.280 these other interviews is not offensive to me at all. I didn't think he was wrong. He was often taken

00:02:01.840 out of context in previous interviews to make it seem like he's slagging Canada as a country.

00:02:06.880 But also, this isn't an effective rhetorical line for the Liberals, because you can't attack Polyev

00:02:12.780 for what he's saying now, based on what he said months ago, unless you're trying to call out

00:02:17.960 hypocrisy. They're basically saying, oh, dang, Polyev actually has a really good rhetorical line

00:02:23.540 right now. And so we should counter by saying, nuh-uh, you said something different eight months

00:02:29.220 ago. But it's not even really hypocrisy. They're just getting mad that he said something that wasn't

00:02:33.300 as effective eight months ago. But here we go with what the Liberals tried to post in this video.

00:02:38.320 It says, witches appear, while conservatives continue to pander and divide, will always stand up

00:02:44.320 for Canada. Okay, guys. Well, you know, tell me you're insecure without telling me you're insecure.

00:02:50.380 And this is, by the way, something that Mark Carney has said, and I agree with him. He has said that

00:02:54.540 we cannot control what the U.S. president says or does. We can control what we do on this side of

00:03:00.780 the border. It's not the Americans' fault. It's our fault. We're stupid. The president's talk of 51st

00:03:05.760 statehood, whether it is a joke or not, is unacceptable. We are shooting ourselves in the foot

00:03:11.780 if we continue this anti-America, you know, hissy fit. A country that stands on its own feet,

00:03:18.980 is master in its own home, that bows before no nation, a country that is unbreakable.

00:03:28.200 Everything is broken in Canada.

00:03:32.060 Okay, but what's their actual point here? They realize that he's criticizing them for sucking 0.99

00:03:37.300 at their jobs in those other clips. In the recent speech clips that you were seeing on the left side

00:03:43.000 of the screen there, Polyev was talking about how we should be strengthening ourselves so we can

00:03:49.220 actually negotiate from a place of strength. His other clips of saying we're stupid, the country's 1.00

00:03:55.180 broken, or Jamil Javani saying we have to stop shooting ourselves in the foot with this anti-American 1.00

00:03:59.780 hissy fit. They are criticizing the way that this government frivolously complains about the United

00:04:05.100 States and just acts helpless to get a trade deal done while not actually making the domestic policy

00:04:11.400 changes needed in order to be able to get the trade deal. Because again, if you don't actually

00:04:17.040 have anything to bargain with, i.e. a strong economy, then you're never going to get a trade deal done.

00:04:23.380 Because if you want a good outcome, well, you're not going to have that unless you actually build up

00:04:28.680 your economy, or you're going to have to take a bad deal and make a deal right now with the poor

00:04:32.920 economy. But the Carney liberals just sit around basically blaming Trump for not getting a deal

00:04:38.480 done. But that just points to the fact that he's not threatened by them at all. They can't actually

00:04:43.500 push him, and they're not willing to make any concessions. And so we're just in this dumb holding 0.98

00:04:48.060 pattern right here. So this commercial that the liberals released doesn't really even make the 0.75

00:04:53.760 point that they think it does. Really, it just shows that Polyev was right. And now he's basically

00:04:58.480 laying out the ground, the path for how you actually implement, like, good policy that will

00:05:04.260 get us to a proper trade deal. But now I want to take you guys over to some of these panel shows

00:05:09.740 analyzing Polyev's speech. Or actually, we'll start off with question period, then we'll go over to the

00:05:14.500 CPAC footage. So this is from question period today, where the liberals are already trying to retail

00:05:20.800 this new line that Polyev finally woke up and decided that Trump was bad, and he's following our lead.

00:05:27.520 That's not what was in the speech at all. Polyev had previously said, yeah, I don't like the 51st

00:05:34.120 state talk. Yes, of course, I don't like the tariffs. His whole point before, and his whole point

00:05:40.620 still is, the fact that focusing on Donald Trump doesn't solve anything. Okay, reality is he can be

00:05:48.840 unreasonable sometimes. We don't like the tariffs. He makes bad jokes at our expense, because clearly

00:05:54.720 they're jokes. He's not trying to actually annex us. What are you going to do now? And the liberals

00:05:59.100 basically have never left square one of just being offended, because they think it's better for their

00:06:03.660 electoral prospects to just clutch their pearls and then point to the conservatives and be like,

00:06:08.360 they don't hate Trump enough, even though he's letting, they're letting Trump eat our economic

00:06:12.940 lunch by not actually strengthening our economy enough to be able to negotiate against the Americans 0.74

00:06:18.320 properly. The Canadian economy is suffering the effects of unjustified tariffs from the Trump

00:06:32.140 administration in the U.S. Conservatives propose creating a strategic, critical mineral reserve,

00:06:39.940 as well as an all-party KUSMA working group to address these challenges and to create a tariff-free

00:06:47.260 auto pact. This would restore our leverage and support Canadian manufacturing. So will the government

00:06:53.700 work with us to ensure that Canada can negotiate trade deals that benefit our workers and our economy?

00:07:00.600 That was a good overall summation for Michael Barrett there on specifically what Polly have proposed.

00:07:05.640 I just want to kind of highlight a couple of things there. Now, I'm not the biggest fan of the

00:07:09.300 strategic minerals reserve. It's not that it's a bad idea. I just think it's not an A-plus idea. I

00:07:14.660 think you could just lower taxes and regulations heavily, and that would probably give Canada more

00:07:19.700 bargaining power by just being more of an economic threat to other economies, because more jobs might

00:07:24.320 want to move into Canada than go the other direction for a change. But the big part of Polly's proposal,

00:07:30.880 I think really 80% of it, 90% of it, the real meat and potatoes of it, is this auto pact. The idea that

00:07:38.880 Canada will agree to tear up its agreement with China to let EVs into Canada, but we need a zero

00:07:45.380 tariff relationship for automobiles between Canada and the United States. Really good idea. I've been

00:07:50.620 advocating this for several months now. You use basically China as the bargaining chip with the

00:07:57.160 Americans. Now, I don't think we actually had to sign an agreement the way that Carney did with China

00:08:01.260 and proposing that we, you know, integrate on security matters and cultural matters. It's

00:08:06.060 ridiculous. But what Carney or any prime minister should have always done is go to Trump and say, 0.77

00:08:11.340 you know what, I know that you find, you know, you don't like, you want more stuff built in America.

00:08:17.660 That's fine. You're going to have to trade with somebody, though. And who do you rather trade more

00:08:21.560 with, Canada or China? And how about we team up against China and we try and reduce their 0.98

00:08:27.420 international power by becoming more reliant on Western good countries for trade rather than

00:08:33.980 dictatorships, communist dictatorships like China that hate us? I think that was always the better 1.00

00:08:38.980 move. So now the liberals, but the thing is, the liberals are going to pretend like the conservatives

00:08:43.420 and them have the same position. They don't. The liberals, their position is to sign deals with China

00:08:48.780 and never get a deal done with America.

00:08:50.500 Minister of industry to answer directly to my colleague. Obviously, we can we can get to a good

00:08:57.700 deal that is that this is exactly why the prime minister is engaged. But also, this is exactly why

00:09:02.980 our colleague, the minister of Canada, U.S. Trade is in Washington today meeting with the representative

00:09:09.180 for trade. That's right to do that work. That being said, we've took good note of what the leader of

00:09:15.940 the opposition said yesterday at a Canadian club. And we're very happy that a lot of our program is

00:09:21.960 being copied.

00:09:22.540 What program? The idea that there should be a trade deal signed? I'm pretty sure everyone who had more

00:09:29.760 than five IQ points agreed that we should have a trade deal signed. Look, that's the thing. The

00:09:35.220 liberals don't actually have a plan. And so they're just acting like any plan the conservatives came up

00:09:40.100 with. We're like, well, of course, that's that's what we were always doing. You don't know,

00:09:44.060 except the carny liberals wouldn't even tell people what the trade negotiation terms were that they

00:09:49.400 were trying to offer. They've been very, very like opaque about the whole negotiating process,

00:09:55.220 because they probably just don't want Canadians to know that they're not actually seriously

00:09:58.840 trying to get to a deal. Trump even said that a couple times, he's blown away at the fact that the

00:10:03.320 Canadian negotiators don't really offer anything. They don't demand anything, they just kind of show

00:10:07.380 up and do the routine about how we're better together, and we should have no tariffs. And then once the

00:10:12.820 Americans just say no or say, hey, well, we want you to get rid of supply management, or we want you

00:10:17.100 to do this or that the Canadians are like, well, Carney didn't give us any permission to actually

00:10:21.640 negotiate. So see you guys. That's actually the current issue. Carney will not let his own trade

00:10:26.460 representatives represent Canada and negotiate. They can basically just give the very vague party line

00:10:33.520 that we want a good deal. And that's it. We want no tariffs. Okay, what are you gonna do to get

00:10:38.460 there? But let's get back to the question period. Conservatives have consistently demonstrated

00:10:47.280 a willingness to work with the government to get results for Canadians in the face of these

00:10:53.840 unjustified tariffs from US President Donald Trump. Look at the constructive amendments to the budget bill

00:10:59.380 that they adopted in our support for efforts to relieve taxes on Canadians in this challenging time.

00:11:04.620 Our proposal for an all party Kuzma working group to get a tariff free auto pact to create a strategic

00:11:11.300 critical mineral reserve will help us to negotiate from a position of strength. So will the government

00:11:16.260 accept our offer to work together to get the best results in the interest of all Canadians?

00:11:22.040 Minister of Industry. Mr. Speaker, there are lots of things we cannot control. Certainly we can control

00:11:28.460 the White House, but there are lots of things we can control. And what we can control...

00:11:32.620 Like tax rates that they won't lower? It's always absurd whenever they try and like say like,

00:11:37.800 oh, we can't control Trump, but we can control what we do. And then they don't do anything.

00:11:42.400 How to build one strong Canadian economy. Who said that first? Prime Minister Carney.

00:11:47.300 You're here. Who copied that?

00:11:48.540 Oh, wow. Wow. Carney said that we should build one strong Canadian economy.

00:11:53.280 Is she actually, she actually gonna claim that the Conservatives are stealing that?

00:11:57.520 Okay, let's see. Listen to this. Listen to this.

00:11:59.860 One strong Canadian. Lots of things who can control. And what we can control is how to build

00:12:05.080 one strong Canadian economy. Who said that first? Prime Minister Carney.

00:12:09.040 You're here.

00:12:09.380 Who copied that yesterday? The leader of the opposition.

00:12:13.240 Mr. Speaker, of course we'll work on an auto pact that is tear free. Of course, Mr. Speaker,

00:12:19.460 we will work. No, that's, that's actually, they're actually stealing that from the Conservatives if

00:12:24.080 they start doing that. Now, steal away is good for the country if they steal that. But no, that's not

00:12:29.160 what they were working on. Because Carney has never articulated that at all. But she gets up there and

00:12:33.460 be like, who came up with the idea of having one strong Canadian economy first? Who said that first?

00:12:38.940 Well, that was the very attractive, very handsome Prime Minister Mark Carney. And guess who stole that from

00:12:45.060 him? Opposition leader, Pierre Polyev. Like very incisive, Melanie Jolie, very incisive. What else did

00:12:51.920 Polyev steal from Mark Carney? The idea that you shouldn't eat your own thumbs? Like, you know, they should

00:12:57.140 probably sleep at night and be awake in the day. What other, you should eat food with your mouth? Did

00:13:03.380 Polyev also steal that from Mark Carney? It's almost like you guys don't actually have a plan. And so the only

00:13:10.020 things that you can like lean on is just vague rhetoric. This is where the Conservatives are doing

00:13:15.920 way better with this one pivot on trade. Now they have to do it on everything else as well. This is

00:13:21.040 step number one. They also need to be running on a big tax cut. I haven't seen that yet. They need to

00:13:26.040 do it. Not just because I like big tax cuts. It's electorally effective. Running a big tax cut, run on a

00:13:33.100 massive crackdown on crime, big mandatory first time minimums for things like dealing fentanyl and all

00:13:38.100 that. That would be very popular. Big parental rights bills, all that stuff. What you have to

00:13:43.980 do, what the Conservatives are doing well on the trade issue though, and what they should do on

00:13:47.640 these other issues, is you criticize what the Liberals are doing and then you give a very common

00:13:52.880 sense alternative that every Canadian could agree with. You know, if you just ran a 20% across the

00:13:59.020 board tax cut and pointing out that they won't cut taxes and they're effectively letting the Americans

00:14:03.260 eat our lunch because they have a low tax environment relative to us, the Liberals are

00:14:10.140 too petty to actually adopt good ideas and they will then spit in the face of Canadians who want that 0.71

00:14:15.660 implemented at 20% tax cut by saying, well, we're not going to do that. We are the Liberals and we

00:14:22.580 come up with all the great ideas like, you know, having a strong economy and whatnot. It's like, well, then

00:14:27.720 adopt our policy to cut taxes, force them to oppose the most obvious things the Canadian government

00:14:34.440 should be doing but has not been doing. You would criticize what they're doing and then you give a

00:14:39.160 very tantalizing proposal of what Canadians want that they are then going to have to spit on and reject.

00:14:45.160 We have a strong critical mineral supply. And of course, we're willing to work as one team Canada,

00:14:52.280 the Conservatives should just get on board.

00:14:53.880 Yeah, I remember saying Albert Sturgeon-River.

00:14:56.440 Speaker, the numbers are in and Canada's economy shrank during the fourth quarter of 2025. In fact,

00:15:03.880 Canada's economy is the only shrinking economy in the G7. The Prime Minister promised to build the

00:15:10.120 strongest economy in the G7. Instead, he's delivered the weakest. So in the face of that,

00:15:16.600 will the Prime Minister accept any responsibility for the dismal state of Canada's economy?

00:15:23.880 I do like how Melanie Jolie just got off of talking about how we're trying to build one

00:15:27.480 strong economy and then got immediately smacked by the bad GDP numbers.

00:15:31.400 My second message is immigration.

00:15:33.720 It's always interesting when the Conservatives cite reports. They only cite part of the report.

00:15:38.920 Of course, it's unfortunate that we saw a contraction of 0.6% in real GDP.

00:15:43.800 What else does the report say? It says that consumer demand is up.

00:15:47.320 It says that domestic business investment is up.

00:15:50.200 Beyond that, my colleague's very well read. I'm sure he read Bloomberg yesterday.

00:15:54.440 The highest foreign direct investment Canada has seen since 2007 at almost 100 billion dollars.

00:16:01.960 A major nation building project is exactly what this country is engaged in.

00:16:05.720 Okay. I'm not sure if you've guessed yet. This isn't true. It's only true if you've never taken

00:16:12.760 economics in your life, if you've never even heard about the concept of economics. So what the Liberals

00:16:20.040 are claiming, I'll actually pull up Mark Carney making the claim this morning. The Liberals are

00:16:24.920 claiming that we have had the biggest amount of foreign investments come into Canada since 2007.

00:16:31.640 Mark Carney here says, good news for Canadians. More international investment means more of our

00:16:36.600 businesses, more of our businesses can scale up faster, creating more high paying career opportunities

00:16:41.560 for Canadians. The Financial Post says foreign investment surges to Canada's strongest level since

00:16:45.880 2007. In 2025, net investments in Canada exceeded net outflows by 17.4 billion. The surplus showing

00:16:54.360 a reversal from 2022. Okay. The fact that we've only now stopped, reversed it is insane. So basically,

00:17:03.080 we're admitting that for years, we literally had more money leaving than coming into the country in

00:17:08.280 terms of foreign investors. Foreign investors were pulling money out before, and now they're starting on

00:17:12.920 net to put some back in. But it's complete nonsense. This is the most we have had since 2007. Do you

00:17:21.640 know, there was a community note put under that post by Mark Carney because it's not right. In fact,

00:17:29.400 what it said here was that, yes, they brought in, it was like the actual amount that they brought in

00:17:36.600 is, I don't even need to go into the numbers. Effectively, they're not correcting for inflation.

00:17:41.080 So no, it is not the most since 2007. It's been quite a while. Only if you don't actually apply

00:17:47.960 inflation, does the numbers look impressive. That's like saying like, oh my goodness, this is

00:17:53.080 the most money we've ever taken into the, or like the biggest investment in whatever or whatever,

00:17:58.520 since 1930. It's like, well, yes, 1930, $1,000 was considered a lot of money. That's not how it works

00:18:05.080 anymore. 2007, like the dollar, like the dollar value has like doubled since then, or sorry,

00:18:11.560 I mean like a shrink in half. Yes, so whatever number you have, cut that in half or more,

00:18:17.800 and then you're getting to where the actual, like then you're, you're getting to a more realistic

00:18:22.360 number there. Anyways, so now I just want to jump over to CPAC, where it starts off with a liberal

00:18:29.560 strategist analyzing pure Polyev speech yesterday. And like with what Melanie Jolie was saying,

00:18:34.920 the liberals are just pretending that somehow Polyev is playing catch up rather than in a lot of ways,

00:18:41.080 he's now changing the game and the liberals don't like it. But was that speech, those positions,

00:18:47.400 were they distinct enough from what we've heard from Mark Carney to help the public image of the

00:18:53.480 conservative leader in terms of improving his polling numbers? Yes and no. Yes, in terms of

00:19:01.320 China, I think he sort of drew a stronger line on China. People are paying attention, but no.

00:19:06.840 Drew a stronger line on China. He's always been tough on China. That's like not changed at all.

00:19:11.560 Oh, for the rest of it. I, I read the speech. I didn't watch all of the speech.

00:19:16.360 Um, and I, I, my thought as I was reading it was, uh-huh. Uh-huh. I think Prime Minister Carney said

00:19:23.240 that. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. What part? Is this going to be the Melanie Jolie line where he talked about

00:19:28.760 building one strong Canadian economy and that's Mark Carney's thing? Huh? What took you so long,

00:19:34.280 Pierre? And, and also, uh, you're the guy that went around for so long saying Canada's broken and all

00:19:39.640 of a sudden you have this newfound faith in the country. Yes. The Canadian, the Canada's broken

00:19:45.240 by the Liberals. The policy sucks. It's a great country that could be extremely prosperous if their 1.00

00:19:50.760 policies were gotten rid of. There's nothing hypocritical here. They keep trying to find

00:19:54.520 hypocrisy where there is no hypocrisy. So that was part of it. Um, I, I think he'll have to be

00:20:00.280 saying those kinds of things for a while for people to feel that there's a big difference because the

00:20:04.760 time to have started talking about those things was when President Trump got elected because

00:20:09.000 Mr. Polyev was the leader. Then Mr. Carney got elected and Mr. Polyev still wasn't talking about those

00:20:14.520 things through his leadership review. Uh, he wasn't talking about those things because he was worried

00:20:19.880 about the Jamal, Jamal Giovanni part of the base of the party. And now that he's through his leadership

00:20:26.120 review, he's suddenly starting to talk. You're not contradicting Jamil Giovanni at all. If anything,

00:20:31.160 he's actually agreeing with Jamil Giovanni. It's just that you could maybe argue that Jamil Giovanni

00:20:35.880 shouldn't have made the hissy fit comment. Even then in context, he didn't say a thing wrong. It's just

00:20:41.960 people taking it out of context and acting like every Canadian who's had ever had a complaint

00:20:46.120 about America as having a hissy fit. No, his whole point was, it's not a great trade strategy just to

00:20:51.000 stand up and complain about something that Donald Trump said, rather than negotiating a real deal,

00:20:57.240 taking a really hard stance. He's not saying go soft, play, play trade hardball, do that if you want,

00:21:03.800 but actually do it. Don't just sit around basically saying, oh, Trump's so unreasonable. He's so

00:21:08.280 terrible. The Canada-US relationship is over. Oh my goodness, he made a joke about us. But

00:21:13.800 Polyev is not contradicting Jamil. If anything, he's saying it in just the softer way that's going

00:21:19.320 to connect with more voters. The whole idea, because he said in the speech, we can't, we shouldn't be,

00:21:24.440 when we're negotiating with the United States, saying that our relationship is irrevocably changed

00:21:30.360 with the United States. It's all over. The American era is done and Canada is going to go find friends

00:21:36.040 elsewhere. Yes, that's strategically stupid. And Polyev is pointing out that's strategically stupid. 1.00

00:21:41.640 What's also strategically stupid is not cutting taxes and deregulating and doing all these things 1.00

00:21:46.600 that would strengthen your position at the bargaining table. Of course, you don't have a 0.99

00:21:49.880 trade deal signed. You're in no position to negotiate. And they can blame Trump all day long.

00:21:54.440 They've not done anything to try and change the game for Canada. But yeah, so this is, I find all of

00:21:59.880 this just so silly. Like again, they're just kind of exposing the fact that they don't really have

00:22:05.240 a good rhetorical line against Polyev on this one. About those things. So it's a, do we need them to

00:22:11.080 be talking about that? It's good for the country for those kinds of conversations. But I think people

00:22:14.440 feel that the prime minister's got a lot of that stuff handled. Do they? He said he was going to get

00:22:19.320 a deal done by July or August. Now the country's only polling well for the liberals right now. The

00:22:26.120 liberals are only leading by about six or seven points on average on the pollsters that aren't,

00:22:30.600 don't have these crazy hyperbolic leads that they're just not believable. That's not because

00:22:34.840 I don't want to believe them. It's just not believable. Do you really think Alberta is neck 0.99

00:22:39.080 and neck between the conservatives and liberals right now? I'm from Alberta. I live most of my,

00:22:43.640 I spend most of my time in Alberta. I can tell you there has not been a giant, just like a,

00:22:48.360 like wind change in Alberta in favor of the liberals. You know, maybe a little tighter overall,

00:22:54.040 but the conservatives are still going to win Alberta if an election was today by more than 10

00:22:58.280 points, probably more like 15 or 20 points or something like that. And that's if I even believe

00:23:03.480 some of the more realistic polls that are bad for the conservatives. But the thing is the liberals were

00:23:09.240 only up mainly because Trump was back in the headlines. Now the liberals might still remain in

00:23:15.160 the headlines if the conservatives were stayed in their sort of messaging limbo because they were in

00:23:20.760 a bit of a holding pattern where they weren't really coming up with new stuff. But Polyev has

00:23:24.600 found a smarter line of actually basically crafting really good ideas. I think the conservatives were

00:23:29.960 always holding back, not wanting to give the liberals the good ideas they had. I think they've

00:23:35.160 realized, give them all your good ideas. They're not going to take them and they're going to look

00:23:38.840 ridiculous not taking them. Criticize the liberals for not getting a deal done, then give them a great

00:23:43.640 idea of things they should be doing to get a deal, and then have the liberals spit in your face.

00:23:48.200 That's what the conservatives should keep doing. Keep proposing great stuff and keep having the

00:23:52.920 liberals arrogantly shut it down because that's how you get the topic away from Trump and towards

00:24:00.120 Mark Carney being incompetent. Anyways, with that all being said, thank you guys for watching.

00:24:05.960 I actually have to go to Vancouver now. We have a 1BC town hall on tomorrow, I guess, the 28th of February,

00:24:13.640 2 to 4pm Pacific, of course. If you guys want to come to that 1BC event with myself, Dallas Brody,

00:24:19.880 and Billboard Chris, you can sign up at the link I'm going to attach at the top of the comments below.

00:24:25.640 If you're in the Lower Mainland area or the Fraser Valley, I highly recommend showing up.

00:24:29.880 If you're not in that area, do not try and come from as far away, like from farther away,

00:24:34.920 because that would be insane. I do not want you like rushing all the way to get there.

00:24:38.760 We will be doing a bigger tour at some point for the 1BC party and with Dallas Brody.

00:24:43.080 Anyways, but with all that being said, thank you guys for watching.

00:24:46.440 Like, share, subscribe, and comment, and I will see you all later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool

Carney Liberals SHAKEN by Poilievre's new speech!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript