Carney Liberals SHAKEN by Poilievre's new speech!
Episode Stats
Harmful content
Misogyny
1
sentences flagged
Toxicity
10
sentences flagged
Hate speech
4
sentences flagged
Summary
Polyveez's speech on trade with the US yesterday was highly well received by the Conservative Party of Canada, but the Liberals are not so pleased. They are trying to downplay it, but it's not so hard to see what they're actually trying to do.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.
00:00:06.120
You can tell that Conservative Party leader Pierre Polyev's speech yesterday
00:00:10.200
on Canada U.S. trade was highly effective, not because Conservatives liked it, of course
00:00:15.980
Conservatives liked it, but because Mark Carney's Liberals hated it, and they are not reacting well
00:00:22.640
at all. They're just firing blindly, because I guess they never expected Polyev's Conservatives
00:00:28.180
to do a proper messaging reset on trade, and reorient the issue back towards the domestic side
00:00:34.540
of how Carney has screwed up so badly that we actually can't negotiate with the U.S. because
00:00:40.140
Carney and Trudeau have made us so weak. So in just a second here, I want to take you through
00:00:45.720
what the Liberal Party has posted on their own social media, as well as panels where Liberal
00:00:51.860
strategists are trying to downplay what Polyev did yesterday. But before I get into it, I just want
00:00:57.780
to remind you guys, if you like the channel, make sure to leave a like on this video, subscribe if
00:01:02.800
you are not yet a subscriber, comment what you think about this issue, and of course, if you want to
00:01:08.440
support the channel, hit the join button below the video and make a small monthly contribution. It
00:01:13.500
allows me to be less reliant on the YouTube algorithm, which is completely wacky these days.
00:01:19.060
Like, some people's channels are doing really well. My channel will sometimes have a great click-through
00:01:23.580
rate on the actual videos where a lot of people are seeing it and clicking on it. But YouTube
00:01:28.080
just apparently doesn't show my videos to anyone. So I'm like barely crawling sometimes over like
00:01:32.520
10-15,000 views after like more than a day of a video being out when that's not typical for this
00:01:38.440
channel at all. But it's just how the YouTube gods work sometimes. Anyways, so I want to start off
00:01:45.220
with this post on the Liberal Party's X account that's trying to go after Polyev, not for what he said
00:01:51.620
in the speech, but what he said in other interviews. And by the way, what he said in
00:01:57.280
these other interviews is not offensive to me at all. I didn't think he was wrong. He was often taken
00:02:01.840
out of context in previous interviews to make it seem like he's slagging Canada as a country.
00:02:06.880
But also, this isn't an effective rhetorical line for the Liberals, because you can't attack Polyev
00:02:12.780
for what he's saying now, based on what he said months ago, unless you're trying to call out
00:02:17.960
hypocrisy. They're basically saying, oh, dang, Polyev actually has a really good rhetorical line
00:02:23.540
right now. And so we should counter by saying, nuh-uh, you said something different eight months
00:02:29.220
ago. But it's not even really hypocrisy. They're just getting mad that he said something that wasn't
00:02:33.300
as effective eight months ago. But here we go with what the Liberals tried to post in this video.
00:02:38.320
It says, witches appear, while conservatives continue to pander and divide, will always stand up
00:02:44.320
for Canada. Okay, guys. Well, you know, tell me you're insecure without telling me you're insecure.
00:02:50.380
And this is, by the way, something that Mark Carney has said, and I agree with him. He has said that
00:02:54.540
we cannot control what the U.S. president says or does. We can control what we do on this side of
00:03:00.780
the border. It's not the Americans' fault. It's our fault. We're stupid. The president's talk of 51st
00:03:05.760
statehood, whether it is a joke or not, is unacceptable. We are shooting ourselves in the foot
00:03:11.780
if we continue this anti-America, you know, hissy fit. A country that stands on its own feet,
00:03:18.980
is master in its own home, that bows before no nation, a country that is unbreakable.
00:03:32.060
Okay, but what's their actual point here? They realize that he's criticizing them for sucking
0.99
00:03:37.300
at their jobs in those other clips. In the recent speech clips that you were seeing on the left side
00:03:43.000
of the screen there, Polyev was talking about how we should be strengthening ourselves so we can
00:03:49.220
actually negotiate from a place of strength. His other clips of saying we're stupid, the country's
1.00
00:03:55.180
broken, or Jamil Javani saying we have to stop shooting ourselves in the foot with this anti-American
1.00
00:03:59.780
hissy fit. They are criticizing the way that this government frivolously complains about the United
00:04:05.100
States and just acts helpless to get a trade deal done while not actually making the domestic policy
00:04:11.400
changes needed in order to be able to get the trade deal. Because again, if you don't actually
00:04:17.040
have anything to bargain with, i.e. a strong economy, then you're never going to get a trade deal done.
00:04:23.380
Because if you want a good outcome, well, you're not going to have that unless you actually build up
00:04:28.680
your economy, or you're going to have to take a bad deal and make a deal right now with the poor
00:04:32.920
economy. But the Carney liberals just sit around basically blaming Trump for not getting a deal
00:04:38.480
done. But that just points to the fact that he's not threatened by them at all. They can't actually
00:04:43.500
push him, and they're not willing to make any concessions. And so we're just in this dumb holding
0.98
00:04:48.060
pattern right here. So this commercial that the liberals released doesn't really even make the
0.75
00:04:53.760
point that they think it does. Really, it just shows that Polyev was right. And now he's basically
00:04:58.480
laying out the ground, the path for how you actually implement, like, good policy that will
00:05:04.260
get us to a proper trade deal. But now I want to take you guys over to some of these panel shows
00:05:09.740
analyzing Polyev's speech. Or actually, we'll start off with question period, then we'll go over to the
00:05:14.500
CPAC footage. So this is from question period today, where the liberals are already trying to retail
00:05:20.800
this new line that Polyev finally woke up and decided that Trump was bad, and he's following our lead.
00:05:27.520
That's not what was in the speech at all. Polyev had previously said, yeah, I don't like the 51st
00:05:34.120
state talk. Yes, of course, I don't like the tariffs. His whole point before, and his whole point
00:05:40.620
still is, the fact that focusing on Donald Trump doesn't solve anything. Okay, reality is he can be
00:05:48.840
unreasonable sometimes. We don't like the tariffs. He makes bad jokes at our expense, because clearly
00:05:54.720
they're jokes. He's not trying to actually annex us. What are you going to do now? And the liberals
00:05:59.100
basically have never left square one of just being offended, because they think it's better for their
00:06:03.660
electoral prospects to just clutch their pearls and then point to the conservatives and be like,
00:06:08.360
they don't hate Trump enough, even though he's letting, they're letting Trump eat our economic
00:06:12.940
lunch by not actually strengthening our economy enough to be able to negotiate against the Americans
0.74
00:06:18.320
properly. The Canadian economy is suffering the effects of unjustified tariffs from the Trump
00:06:32.140
administration in the U.S. Conservatives propose creating a strategic, critical mineral reserve,
00:06:39.940
as well as an all-party KUSMA working group to address these challenges and to create a tariff-free
00:06:47.260
auto pact. This would restore our leverage and support Canadian manufacturing. So will the government
00:06:53.700
work with us to ensure that Canada can negotiate trade deals that benefit our workers and our economy?
00:07:00.600
That was a good overall summation for Michael Barrett there on specifically what Polly have proposed.
00:07:05.640
I just want to kind of highlight a couple of things there. Now, I'm not the biggest fan of the
00:07:09.300
strategic minerals reserve. It's not that it's a bad idea. I just think it's not an A-plus idea. I
00:07:14.660
think you could just lower taxes and regulations heavily, and that would probably give Canada more
00:07:19.700
bargaining power by just being more of an economic threat to other economies, because more jobs might
00:07:24.320
want to move into Canada than go the other direction for a change. But the big part of Polly's proposal,
00:07:30.880
I think really 80% of it, 90% of it, the real meat and potatoes of it, is this auto pact. The idea that
00:07:38.880
Canada will agree to tear up its agreement with China to let EVs into Canada, but we need a zero
00:07:45.380
tariff relationship for automobiles between Canada and the United States. Really good idea. I've been
00:07:50.620
advocating this for several months now. You use basically China as the bargaining chip with the
00:07:57.160
Americans. Now, I don't think we actually had to sign an agreement the way that Carney did with China
00:08:01.260
and proposing that we, you know, integrate on security matters and cultural matters. It's
00:08:06.060
ridiculous. But what Carney or any prime minister should have always done is go to Trump and say,
0.77
00:08:11.340
you know what, I know that you find, you know, you don't like, you want more stuff built in America.
00:08:17.660
That's fine. You're going to have to trade with somebody, though. And who do you rather trade more
00:08:21.560
with, Canada or China? And how about we team up against China and we try and reduce their
0.98
00:08:27.420
international power by becoming more reliant on Western good countries for trade rather than
00:08:33.980
dictatorships, communist dictatorships like China that hate us? I think that was always the better
1.00
00:08:38.980
move. So now the liberals, but the thing is, the liberals are going to pretend like the conservatives
00:08:43.420
and them have the same position. They don't. The liberals, their position is to sign deals with China
00:08:50.500
Minister of industry to answer directly to my colleague. Obviously, we can we can get to a good
00:08:57.700
deal that is that this is exactly why the prime minister is engaged. But also, this is exactly why
00:09:02.980
our colleague, the minister of Canada, U.S. Trade is in Washington today meeting with the representative
00:09:09.180
for trade. That's right to do that work. That being said, we've took good note of what the leader of
00:09:15.940
the opposition said yesterday at a Canadian club. And we're very happy that a lot of our program is
00:09:22.540
What program? The idea that there should be a trade deal signed? I'm pretty sure everyone who had more
00:09:29.760
than five IQ points agreed that we should have a trade deal signed. Look, that's the thing. The
00:09:35.220
liberals don't actually have a plan. And so they're just acting like any plan the conservatives came up
00:09:40.100
with. We're like, well, of course, that's that's what we were always doing. You don't know,
00:09:44.060
except the carny liberals wouldn't even tell people what the trade negotiation terms were that they
00:09:49.400
were trying to offer. They've been very, very like opaque about the whole negotiating process,
00:09:55.220
because they probably just don't want Canadians to know that they're not actually seriously
00:09:58.840
trying to get to a deal. Trump even said that a couple times, he's blown away at the fact that the
00:10:03.320
Canadian negotiators don't really offer anything. They don't demand anything, they just kind of show
00:10:07.380
up and do the routine about how we're better together, and we should have no tariffs. And then once the
00:10:12.820
Americans just say no or say, hey, well, we want you to get rid of supply management, or we want you
00:10:17.100
to do this or that the Canadians are like, well, Carney didn't give us any permission to actually
00:10:21.640
negotiate. So see you guys. That's actually the current issue. Carney will not let his own trade
00:10:26.460
representatives represent Canada and negotiate. They can basically just give the very vague party line
00:10:33.520
that we want a good deal. And that's it. We want no tariffs. Okay, what are you gonna do to get
00:10:38.460
there? But let's get back to the question period. Conservatives have consistently demonstrated
00:10:47.280
a willingness to work with the government to get results for Canadians in the face of these
00:10:53.840
unjustified tariffs from US President Donald Trump. Look at the constructive amendments to the budget bill
00:10:59.380
that they adopted in our support for efforts to relieve taxes on Canadians in this challenging time.
00:11:04.620
Our proposal for an all party Kuzma working group to get a tariff free auto pact to create a strategic
00:11:11.300
critical mineral reserve will help us to negotiate from a position of strength. So will the government
00:11:16.260
accept our offer to work together to get the best results in the interest of all Canadians?
00:11:22.040
Minister of Industry. Mr. Speaker, there are lots of things we cannot control. Certainly we can control
00:11:28.460
the White House, but there are lots of things we can control. And what we can control...
00:11:32.620
Like tax rates that they won't lower? It's always absurd whenever they try and like say like,
00:11:37.800
oh, we can't control Trump, but we can control what we do. And then they don't do anything.
00:11:42.400
How to build one strong Canadian economy. Who said that first? Prime Minister Carney.
00:11:48.540
Oh, wow. Wow. Carney said that we should build one strong Canadian economy.
00:11:53.280
Is she actually, she actually gonna claim that the Conservatives are stealing that?
00:11:57.520
Okay, let's see. Listen to this. Listen to this.
00:11:59.860
One strong Canadian. Lots of things who can control. And what we can control is how to build
00:12:05.080
one strong Canadian economy. Who said that first? Prime Minister Carney.
00:12:09.380
Who copied that yesterday? The leader of the opposition.
00:12:13.240
Mr. Speaker, of course we'll work on an auto pact that is tear free. Of course, Mr. Speaker,
00:12:19.460
we will work. No, that's, that's actually, they're actually stealing that from the Conservatives if
00:12:24.080
they start doing that. Now, steal away is good for the country if they steal that. But no, that's not
00:12:29.160
what they were working on. Because Carney has never articulated that at all. But she gets up there and
00:12:33.460
be like, who came up with the idea of having one strong Canadian economy first? Who said that first?
00:12:38.940
Well, that was the very attractive, very handsome Prime Minister Mark Carney. And guess who stole that from
00:12:45.060
him? Opposition leader, Pierre Polyev. Like very incisive, Melanie Jolie, very incisive. What else did
00:12:51.920
Polyev steal from Mark Carney? The idea that you shouldn't eat your own thumbs? Like, you know, they should
00:12:57.140
probably sleep at night and be awake in the day. What other, you should eat food with your mouth? Did
00:13:03.380
Polyev also steal that from Mark Carney? It's almost like you guys don't actually have a plan. And so the only
00:13:10.020
things that you can like lean on is just vague rhetoric. This is where the Conservatives are doing
00:13:15.920
way better with this one pivot on trade. Now they have to do it on everything else as well. This is
00:13:21.040
step number one. They also need to be running on a big tax cut. I haven't seen that yet. They need to
00:13:26.040
do it. Not just because I like big tax cuts. It's electorally effective. Running a big tax cut, run on a
00:13:33.100
massive crackdown on crime, big mandatory first time minimums for things like dealing fentanyl and all
00:13:38.100
that. That would be very popular. Big parental rights bills, all that stuff. What you have to
00:13:43.980
do, what the Conservatives are doing well on the trade issue though, and what they should do on
00:13:47.640
these other issues, is you criticize what the Liberals are doing and then you give a very common
00:13:52.880
sense alternative that every Canadian could agree with. You know, if you just ran a 20% across the
00:13:59.020
board tax cut and pointing out that they won't cut taxes and they're effectively letting the Americans
00:14:03.260
eat our lunch because they have a low tax environment relative to us, the Liberals are
00:14:10.140
too petty to actually adopt good ideas and they will then spit in the face of Canadians who want that
0.71
00:14:15.660
implemented at 20% tax cut by saying, well, we're not going to do that. We are the Liberals and we
00:14:22.580
come up with all the great ideas like, you know, having a strong economy and whatnot. It's like, well, then
00:14:27.720
adopt our policy to cut taxes, force them to oppose the most obvious things the Canadian government
00:14:34.440
should be doing but has not been doing. You would criticize what they're doing and then you give a
00:14:39.160
very tantalizing proposal of what Canadians want that they are then going to have to spit on and reject.
00:14:45.160
We have a strong critical mineral supply. And of course, we're willing to work as one team Canada,
00:14:56.440
Speaker, the numbers are in and Canada's economy shrank during the fourth quarter of 2025. In fact,
00:15:03.880
Canada's economy is the only shrinking economy in the G7. The Prime Minister promised to build the
00:15:10.120
strongest economy in the G7. Instead, he's delivered the weakest. So in the face of that,
00:15:16.600
will the Prime Minister accept any responsibility for the dismal state of Canada's economy?
00:15:23.880
I do like how Melanie Jolie just got off of talking about how we're trying to build one
00:15:27.480
strong economy and then got immediately smacked by the bad GDP numbers.
00:15:33.720
It's always interesting when the Conservatives cite reports. They only cite part of the report.
00:15:38.920
Of course, it's unfortunate that we saw a contraction of 0.6% in real GDP.
00:15:43.800
What else does the report say? It says that consumer demand is up.
00:15:47.320
It says that domestic business investment is up.
00:15:50.200
Beyond that, my colleague's very well read. I'm sure he read Bloomberg yesterday.
00:15:54.440
The highest foreign direct investment Canada has seen since 2007 at almost 100 billion dollars.
00:16:01.960
A major nation building project is exactly what this country is engaged in.
00:16:05.720
Okay. I'm not sure if you've guessed yet. This isn't true. It's only true if you've never taken
00:16:12.760
economics in your life, if you've never even heard about the concept of economics. So what the Liberals
00:16:20.040
are claiming, I'll actually pull up Mark Carney making the claim this morning. The Liberals are
00:16:24.920
claiming that we have had the biggest amount of foreign investments come into Canada since 2007.
00:16:31.640
Mark Carney here says, good news for Canadians. More international investment means more of our
00:16:36.600
businesses, more of our businesses can scale up faster, creating more high paying career opportunities
00:16:41.560
for Canadians. The Financial Post says foreign investment surges to Canada's strongest level since
00:16:45.880
2007. In 2025, net investments in Canada exceeded net outflows by 17.4 billion. The surplus showing
00:16:54.360
a reversal from 2022. Okay. The fact that we've only now stopped, reversed it is insane. So basically,
00:17:03.080
we're admitting that for years, we literally had more money leaving than coming into the country in
00:17:08.280
terms of foreign investors. Foreign investors were pulling money out before, and now they're starting on
00:17:12.920
net to put some back in. But it's complete nonsense. This is the most we have had since 2007. Do you
00:17:21.640
know, there was a community note put under that post by Mark Carney because it's not right. In fact,
00:17:29.400
what it said here was that, yes, they brought in, it was like the actual amount that they brought in
00:17:36.600
is, I don't even need to go into the numbers. Effectively, they're not correcting for inflation.
00:17:41.080
So no, it is not the most since 2007. It's been quite a while. Only if you don't actually apply
00:17:47.960
inflation, does the numbers look impressive. That's like saying like, oh my goodness, this is
00:17:53.080
the most money we've ever taken into the, or like the biggest investment in whatever or whatever,
00:17:58.520
since 1930. It's like, well, yes, 1930, $1,000 was considered a lot of money. That's not how it works
00:18:05.080
anymore. 2007, like the dollar, like the dollar value has like doubled since then, or sorry,
00:18:11.560
I mean like a shrink in half. Yes, so whatever number you have, cut that in half or more,
00:18:17.800
and then you're getting to where the actual, like then you're, you're getting to a more realistic
00:18:22.360
number there. Anyways, so now I just want to jump over to CPAC, where it starts off with a liberal
00:18:29.560
strategist analyzing pure Polyev speech yesterday. And like with what Melanie Jolie was saying,
00:18:34.920
the liberals are just pretending that somehow Polyev is playing catch up rather than in a lot of ways,
00:18:41.080
he's now changing the game and the liberals don't like it. But was that speech, those positions,
00:18:47.400
were they distinct enough from what we've heard from Mark Carney to help the public image of the
00:18:53.480
conservative leader in terms of improving his polling numbers? Yes and no. Yes, in terms of
00:19:01.320
China, I think he sort of drew a stronger line on China. People are paying attention, but no.
00:19:06.840
Drew a stronger line on China. He's always been tough on China. That's like not changed at all.
00:19:11.560
Oh, for the rest of it. I, I read the speech. I didn't watch all of the speech.
00:19:16.360
Um, and I, I, my thought as I was reading it was, uh-huh. Uh-huh. I think Prime Minister Carney said
00:19:23.240
that. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. What part? Is this going to be the Melanie Jolie line where he talked about
00:19:28.760
building one strong Canadian economy and that's Mark Carney's thing? Huh? What took you so long,
00:19:34.280
Pierre? And, and also, uh, you're the guy that went around for so long saying Canada's broken and all
00:19:39.640
of a sudden you have this newfound faith in the country. Yes. The Canadian, the Canada's broken
00:19:45.240
by the Liberals. The policy sucks. It's a great country that could be extremely prosperous if their
1.00
00:19:50.760
policies were gotten rid of. There's nothing hypocritical here. They keep trying to find
00:19:54.520
hypocrisy where there is no hypocrisy. So that was part of it. Um, I, I think he'll have to be
00:20:00.280
saying those kinds of things for a while for people to feel that there's a big difference because the
00:20:04.760
time to have started talking about those things was when President Trump got elected because
00:20:09.000
Mr. Polyev was the leader. Then Mr. Carney got elected and Mr. Polyev still wasn't talking about those
00:20:14.520
things through his leadership review. Uh, he wasn't talking about those things because he was worried
00:20:19.880
about the Jamal, Jamal Giovanni part of the base of the party. And now that he's through his leadership
00:20:26.120
review, he's suddenly starting to talk. You're not contradicting Jamil Giovanni at all. If anything,
00:20:31.160
he's actually agreeing with Jamil Giovanni. It's just that you could maybe argue that Jamil Giovanni
00:20:35.880
shouldn't have made the hissy fit comment. Even then in context, he didn't say a thing wrong. It's just
00:20:41.960
people taking it out of context and acting like every Canadian who's had ever had a complaint
00:20:46.120
about America as having a hissy fit. No, his whole point was, it's not a great trade strategy just to
00:20:51.000
stand up and complain about something that Donald Trump said, rather than negotiating a real deal,
00:20:57.240
taking a really hard stance. He's not saying go soft, play, play trade hardball, do that if you want,
00:21:03.800
but actually do it. Don't just sit around basically saying, oh, Trump's so unreasonable. He's so
00:21:08.280
terrible. The Canada-US relationship is over. Oh my goodness, he made a joke about us. But
00:21:13.800
Polyev is not contradicting Jamil. If anything, he's saying it in just the softer way that's going
00:21:19.320
to connect with more voters. The whole idea, because he said in the speech, we can't, we shouldn't be,
00:21:24.440
when we're negotiating with the United States, saying that our relationship is irrevocably changed
00:21:30.360
with the United States. It's all over. The American era is done and Canada is going to go find friends
00:21:36.040
elsewhere. Yes, that's strategically stupid. And Polyev is pointing out that's strategically stupid.
1.00
00:21:41.640
What's also strategically stupid is not cutting taxes and deregulating and doing all these things
1.00
00:21:46.600
that would strengthen your position at the bargaining table. Of course, you don't have a
0.99
00:21:49.880
trade deal signed. You're in no position to negotiate. And they can blame Trump all day long.
00:21:54.440
They've not done anything to try and change the game for Canada. But yeah, so this is, I find all of
00:21:59.880
this just so silly. Like again, they're just kind of exposing the fact that they don't really have
00:22:05.240
a good rhetorical line against Polyev on this one. About those things. So it's a, do we need them to
00:22:11.080
be talking about that? It's good for the country for those kinds of conversations. But I think people
00:22:14.440
feel that the prime minister's got a lot of that stuff handled. Do they? He said he was going to get
00:22:19.320
a deal done by July or August. Now the country's only polling well for the liberals right now. The
00:22:26.120
liberals are only leading by about six or seven points on average on the pollsters that aren't,
00:22:30.600
don't have these crazy hyperbolic leads that they're just not believable. That's not because
00:22:34.840
I don't want to believe them. It's just not believable. Do you really think Alberta is neck
0.99
00:22:39.080
and neck between the conservatives and liberals right now? I'm from Alberta. I live most of my,
00:22:43.640
I spend most of my time in Alberta. I can tell you there has not been a giant, just like a,
00:22:48.360
like wind change in Alberta in favor of the liberals. You know, maybe a little tighter overall,
00:22:54.040
but the conservatives are still going to win Alberta if an election was today by more than 10
00:22:58.280
points, probably more like 15 or 20 points or something like that. And that's if I even believe
00:23:03.480
some of the more realistic polls that are bad for the conservatives. But the thing is the liberals were
00:23:09.240
only up mainly because Trump was back in the headlines. Now the liberals might still remain in
00:23:15.160
the headlines if the conservatives were stayed in their sort of messaging limbo because they were in
00:23:20.760
a bit of a holding pattern where they weren't really coming up with new stuff. But Polyev has
00:23:24.600
found a smarter line of actually basically crafting really good ideas. I think the conservatives were
00:23:29.960
always holding back, not wanting to give the liberals the good ideas they had. I think they've
00:23:35.160
realized, give them all your good ideas. They're not going to take them and they're going to look
00:23:38.840
ridiculous not taking them. Criticize the liberals for not getting a deal done, then give them a great
00:23:43.640
idea of things they should be doing to get a deal, and then have the liberals spit in your face.
00:23:48.200
That's what the conservatives should keep doing. Keep proposing great stuff and keep having the
00:23:52.920
liberals arrogantly shut it down because that's how you get the topic away from Trump and towards
00:24:00.120
Mark Carney being incompetent. Anyways, with that all being said, thank you guys for watching.
00:24:05.960
I actually have to go to Vancouver now. We have a 1BC town hall on tomorrow, I guess, the 28th of February,
00:24:13.640
2 to 4pm Pacific, of course. If you guys want to come to that 1BC event with myself, Dallas Brody,
00:24:19.880
and Billboard Chris, you can sign up at the link I'm going to attach at the top of the comments below.
00:24:25.640
If you're in the Lower Mainland area or the Fraser Valley, I highly recommend showing up.
00:24:29.880
If you're not in that area, do not try and come from as far away, like from farther away,
00:24:34.920
because that would be insane. I do not want you like rushing all the way to get there.
00:24:38.760
We will be doing a bigger tour at some point for the 1BC party and with Dallas Brody.
00:24:43.080
Anyways, but with all that being said, thank you guys for watching.
00:24:46.440
Like, share, subscribe, and comment, and I will see you all later.