The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - September 03, 2025


Carney MAD at reporter calling him out for flip-flopping on Trump

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Debunked: Leftists LIE about Alberta "banning" The Handmaid's Tale Carney and Poilievre FIGHT over ending foreign worker program

Episode Stats


Length

16 minutes

Words per minute

183.46

Word count

3,077

Sentence count

182

Harmful content

Toxicity

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A clip from a press conference where Prime Minister Mark Carney appears to flip-flip on the question of Canada's relationship with the United States. Also, a clip of President Trump saying it's great to have Canada on board for his Golden Dome project.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I need to show you a hilarious clip from a press conference today
00:00:06.700 with Prime Minister Mark Carney, where it is clear he is not adjusting very well to his new
00:00:13.400 elbows-down lifestyle. Carney and the Liberals know the only reason they won the federal election
00:00:19.420 back in April was because of the elbows-up campaign. Canadian anti-American sentiments
00:00:25.580 were very high, and the Liberals were sleazy enough to exploit it in the way that they did,
00:00:31.320 saying that our relationship with the Americans are over, and we're going to go trade with Europe
00:00:36.640 and Asia, and we're just going to ignore the U.S. And it turns out reality eventually caught up with
00:00:42.360 the Liberals, and now they need to be nice with U.S. President Donald Trump and the Americans.
00:00:47.980 And they know that one of their only big issues in the last election was how anti-Trump they were.
00:00:54.120 The other day on the show, we went over the top nine issues according to Canadians in a recent
00:01:00.260 abacus data poll, and only two of the nine pulled better for the Liberals than they did for the
00:01:06.400 Conservatives. Things like cost of living, crime, immigration, housing, even health care leans
00:01:13.860 Conservative either mildly or massively. On things like immigration and crime, the Conservatives lead
00:01:20.400 the Liberals on who Canadians trust with it by 50 points. It's insane. The only thing the Liberals
00:01:27.180 had going for them were single-issue anti-Trump voters, but that issue is currently fading in
00:01:32.500 its relevance, and now the Liberals are basically having to put a bullet in its head by now bear-hugging
00:01:37.920 the U.S. to try and repair the relationship that they had been messing up. And yes, did the Americans
00:01:43.380 put tariffs on us and was that bad, and should we be upset about it in some part, even though we
00:01:47.980 already had tariffs on them with things like supply management? Maybe. But reality is, we need to trade
00:01:54.100 with them, and they are a big ally of us. And the way the Liberals were going about all this in the
00:01:59.600 first couple of months of their government was completely ridiculous. We didn't end up signing a
00:02:04.720 trade deal, and now we are running back to the table to try and do it because the Liberals don't
00:02:09.260 want to look pathetic in Parliament when Mark Carney is being grilled by Pierre Pauly of the House of
00:02:14.800 Commons for having no deal. So in a second here, I want to cut over to a clip of President Trump 0.97
00:02:20.440 announcing that Canada is working closely with him on his new Golden Dome project, which again, we should
00:02:27.200 be, but it's so weird that Carney is now doing this again after months and months and months of the
00:02:34.060 elbows up screw the Americans campaign. And then we're going to jump over to the clip of Carney being
00:02:40.000 flustered by a reporter asking him about his flip-flopping on the question of the United States.
00:02:46.960 But before I get into it, I just want to remind you guys that if you like the show, make sure to leave
00:02:51.600 a like on this video, subscribe to the channel if you are not yet a subscriber, and leave a comment on
00:02:57.000 what you think. And then also in the description of this video below, as well as pinned at the top of the
00:03:02.740 comments, I will be linking the We Unify Reclaiming Conference link if you want to buy a ticket. It's
00:03:09.400 being hosted in Calgary at the BMO Centre between September 19th and the 21st, and I will be there
00:03:15.820 both on the floor around mingling with people, and I will also be sitting and speaking on some of their
00:03:21.180 panels if you want to swing by and say hi. But now, without further ado, here is a clip of Donald Trump
00:03:29.300 saying that it's great to have Canada on board for the Golden Dome.
00:03:33.320 In Huntsville Space Comm, we'll play a key role in building the Golden Dome, as you know. That's
00:03:38.600 going to be a big thing. Everybody wants to be a participant in it. Missile Defense Shield, we're
00:03:43.940 going to be having a Golden Dome that the likes of which nobody's ever seen before. The finest,
00:03:50.340 the best. And by the way, Canada called. They want to be a part of it, and that'll be great. But Canada
00:03:55.140 wants very much to be included in that. Then we're going to work something out with them, I hope.
00:03:59.920 And again, this is sensible policy for Mark Carney, but it's not sensible as he had been talking
00:04:07.600 previously. He'd been asking, like, we need to make our own defense alliances, and we need to take
00:04:12.140 care of our own defense, and actually implying we may need to protect our borders from foreign 0.99
00:04:20.060 incursions. He didn't directly say that, but at so many points, he had basically been talking as if
00:04:27.460 Canada may need to arm up its military because maybe Trump will come to try and take Alberta from
00:04:33.180 us or something like that. It was so hysterical, and when you looked at the liberal commentators
00:04:39.000 online reacting to Carney, that's exactly the impression they got of the situation from his
00:04:44.600 overhyping of the situation, that we're in danger because of the Americans, and we need to split
00:04:49.400 off from them, trade with other people. We need to not increase our defense spending, not because
00:04:54.200 we should, and the Americans have been flipping the bill for us for a long time, but we need to
00:04:58.180 potentially protect ourselves against those same Americans who already protect us. But anyways,
00:05:04.180 now we need to jump over, and the funny thing about that last clip is I saw liberals online,
00:05:09.160 more lefty people saying, oh, Trump's lying. Carney would never have agreed to that. He's just making
00:05:13.860 stuff up. And then Carney's office had to confirm that, no, we are trying to work with the Americans on the
00:05:19.040 Golden Dome. And all these people like gobsmacked. He's like, why are you, why are you shocked? This
00:05:24.040 is actually like a totally understandable position for the government to be taking if they hadn't been 1.00
00:05:29.500 doing the stupid elbows up nonsense. But now here is Mark Carney, very much not liking a question from 0.99
00:05:35.920 a reporter about his repeated flip-flopping. When was the last time that you exchanged messages or you
00:05:41.240 spoke to the U.S. president? And it's been four months that you've been text, you know? He's like turning into a witch.
00:05:48.380 As we speak, he's like, I changed messages. What are you trying to imply there? He's so, he's just so mad
00:05:56.260 about this being asked. I love his face.
00:05:58.520 ...or you spoke to the U.S. president. And it's been four months that you've been text, you know?
00:06:04.600 I was like, you're my teacher, and I've been caught.
00:06:06.820 Yeah, you have been caught. He's changed messages like two or three times at this point. Elbows up
00:06:14.140 during the campaign, right out of the campaign, bear hug in the Oval Office. Right after that,
00:06:18.540 trying to normalize relations. Then he went back to elbows up, and then no trade deal signed. But,
00:06:23.100 well, but, you know, it's okay because we don't even need a trade deal because we have USMCA already,
00:06:27.700 even though becoming compliant with USMCA in order to avoid the tariffs actually still costs us more money
00:06:33.800 so that we're still having to pay increased costs regardless. And now we are back to bear hug.
00:06:39.720 And by the way, bear hug is the right stance. But again, I am calling out the hypocrisy here
00:06:45.340 that the people that put Carney into office expected not this. They expected quite the opposite of this.
00:06:52.700 But let's get back to Carney, getting mad about the question, trying to justify himself.
00:06:57.160 ...or you spoke to the US president. And it's been four months that you've been text, you know?
00:07:03.220 I was like, you're my teacher, and I've been caught.
00:07:06.360 And it's been four months since you've been in government. How much longer do Canadians have to
00:07:10.460 wait to see results from those talks with the US president?
00:07:12.880 Okay, well, let's go to results. Right now, we have the best trade deal of any country in the world.
00:07:17.560 Okay? Those are results. We're not weak thinking.
00:07:20.000 Those aren't results. Those pre-existed the situation. And saying we have the best trade
00:07:26.880 deal with the United States is not shocking. We share a massive border with them. We produce
00:07:32.840 a lot of raw resources that the United States wants. So naturally, we trade a lot with them.
00:07:37.940 The problem is, is that you were the guy who said that you knew how to deal with a man like Donald
00:07:44.600 Trump. You've dealt with people like Donald Trump before, which was immediately a red flag because
00:07:49.740 Donald Trump, whatever you think about the man, is a very unique person. There are not other people
00:07:55.600 out there in the world like Donald Trump. And so him acting like, oh, no, I've dealt with people
00:08:00.840 across the boardroom table like him before. No, you have not. And I think the record up to this point
00:08:07.420 proves that you have not because we have massive tariffs on our softwood, our steel and aluminum,
00:08:13.680 and we haven't actually signed a deal to get rid of the 35% tariffs on all the other non-USMCA
00:08:20.260 compliant goods. If he was a good negotiator, he would have probably been able to put forward
00:08:25.120 something saying that, hey, I know that you guys don't want people ripping you off and that you've
00:08:31.320 been paying our defense bill. Know what? We will actually not just increase our defense spending to
00:08:35.740 2%. We'll do 5% preemptively. But we want to have a free trade relationship with you because
00:08:41.920 really our two economies are really one economy based on how integrated they are. Maybe you have
00:08:48.020 to make some extra concessions like getting our supply management. Maybe you have to make extra
00:08:52.000 threats. But he didn't do anything. His entire trade strategy was completely comatose.
00:08:57.700 It can be better and we're working to make it better. But to be absolutely clear,
00:09:01.720 85% of our trade with the United States is tariff free. Nobody else is in that position. Our average
00:09:07.420 tariff is about 5.5%. That's the lowest average tariff of any country.
00:09:13.460 Yeah, but for the companies having to pay 35%, the 15% who are not exempt, it is killer for them. And
00:09:22.680 actually, it's even higher because they act like USMCA compliance means zero tariff.
00:09:26.720 The thing is, I've said this before, it's a bit complicated. But previously, before the 35%
00:09:33.480 tariffs, if you were not USMCA compliant, the tariff was like 5%, 7%. It wasn't very high.
00:09:39.340 But most companies didn't even bother becoming compliant, which should tell you that the cost
00:09:44.000 of becoming compliant to those businesses who are sophisticated enough to probably be able to run
00:09:48.700 the numbers and say how much would the extra paperwork cost? How much would the getting certain
00:09:53.580 things sourced from different countries cost? Because you need products that were like 90%
00:10:00.620 made in Canada, US and Mexico in order to avoid it and be compliant? They looked at that. They looked
00:10:07.100 at all the standards and regulations and they said that I'd rather just pay an extra 5%, 6%, 7%.
00:10:12.240 So it should tell you that the products that have now become USMCA compliant, because only about 34%
00:10:17.940 of them were compliant since 2024. So now that 85%, 90% are compliant now, it means that those
00:10:24.260 companies are paying 5% to 7% plus more in order for that compliance. But anyways, I'll let him keep
00:10:32.340 talking. But it's ridiculous to say, oh, no, our effective tariff is 5%. It's probably more like 8% or 9%
00:10:37.940 or 10% because of the costs of becoming compliant. You can look it up. It costs quite a bit for
00:10:44.500 companies to do the extra paperwork to source their labor and materials from different areas
00:10:48.980 in order for the products to go over the border tariff-free in the world. So right now we have the
00:10:56.100 best, but we have real issues. Without question, we have real issues in steel, in aluminum, in forest
00:11:02.740 products, in autos, potentially in pharma, copper, some other sectors. So there's these strategic
00:11:09.780 sectors that the US has focused on where we have issues. And as well, there will be a review of
00:11:17.460 KUSMA, our trade agreement with the US and Mexico, starting next year. So we need to prepare for that.
00:11:24.180 We need to lay the groundwork for that review. And we need to address as rapidly as possible these
00:11:28.980 strategic sectors. He keeps talking about how we're addressing it and we need to address it,
00:11:33.940 but we haven't addressed it. That's the problem. We haven't seemingly been all that serious about it
00:11:38.980 because we will not put things like supply management on the table. Supply management,
00:11:44.740 as I've also said in other videos, is not even good for Canada because Alberta, with 12% of the
00:11:49.940 population, gets 7% of the quota in order to produce poultry and dairy products. That seems unfair
00:11:57.300 even within Canada. So then why are we holding on to this with a death grip rather than trying to
00:12:02.900 use it for leverage to have zero tariffs between Canada and the United States? It'd be good for
00:12:07.860 both our countries. And in effect, Canadians would actually pay lower prices for things if we just
00:12:14.500 got rid of supply management. Even if we didn't allow any dairy or poultry products in from the United
00:12:20.100 States, just getting rid of that regulatory burden in our country and letting farmers produce whatever
00:12:26.260 they want outside of a quota system, we would domestically already have cheaper dairy and poultry.
00:12:32.900 Okay. So that's the overall context. So we're looking now, given that we've got the best deal.
00:12:41.380 Oh, so we've established that we have the best deal, even though we have 80% of our trade with the
00:12:47.140 United States. So in fact, this is not the best deal. If you look at it purely on paper, how much tariff we
00:12:52.740 pay in effect? Yeah, it's technically the best, but none of the countries paying more trade more
00:12:59.380 than 80% with the United States. So he's just entirely wrong when he says specious things like
00:13:05.540 that to really focus in on those strategic sectors and prepare the groundwork for that broader discussion
00:13:11.860 on Kuzma. That's what we're doing. I last spoke, uh, exchange messages. I last spoke, uh, to the...
00:13:18.500 He's still so mad about it. He's still seething about the him changing messages because he did
00:13:23.620 change messages. And it's like gnawing at the back of his head, like a rat spoke, uh, exchange messages.
00:13:30.420 I last spoke, uh, to the president, uh, Monday evening. I spoke at length, um, uh, on a, on a wide range
00:13:37.460 of issues, including on, uh, including on trade, but geopolitical, uh, uh, other issues, labor issues,
00:13:42.740 et cetera. Uh, it was a good conversation. Uh, we have a team, a very senior team. The clerk of the
00:13:48.020 Privy Council is there in Washington as we speak, uh, that is meeting with the, uh, the US counterparts.
00:13:53.860 Don't expect immediate white smoke on one of these strategic, uh, uh, sectors, but that's the type of
00:13:59.780 conversation that we're having. So he's already telling us not to actually assume that anything's
00:14:04.500 going to be getting done on steel aluminum or softwood lumber anytime soon. But the thing is,
00:14:10.580 that's the problem with Carney. It's all talk. I think previously he wasn't still seething about the,
00:14:14.820 the changing messages thing. He was, uh, seething about the exchanging messages thing with Donald
00:14:19.220 Trump because he does also doesn't like it being said in the media that he's having this more direct,
00:14:24.340 warmer relationship with Donald Trump implied through the idea that they're exchanging messages
00:14:30.340 in this casual way having, uh, and we'll continue to have as well. And this is a government that can
00:14:36.500 do more than one thing at one time, as well as, uh, advancing those discussions in Europe,
00:14:41.300 uh, and in Asia, as we diversify our trade partners. The problem is we're not really
00:14:46.820 diversifying trade partners. We're losing lucrative trade with the United States, and we are trying to
00:14:53.700 replace it with random countries in Europe and Asia who are not going to be paying us as much as the
00:14:59.700 Americans would for our output, for our exports. This is why we need a deal fast. I would like to
00:15:06.660 see white smoke on this stuff very fast, but we keep acting like it's ridiculous. It's unreasonable 0.73
00:15:13.780 to expect him to actually do the things he said that he was going to do quickly. Carney, you, if you
00:15:20.260 were watching the federal election, did you get the impression from what he was saying that he was not,
00:15:24.980 he was going to move slowly and not get anything done in the year 2025? Or did you think that because
00:15:30.900 he pitched himself as the man to lead us through a crisis that he is going to get in there and he's
00:15:35.700 going to break stuff to fix it back up and he's going to get a deal on the table with the Americans
00:15:40.980 within a month and it's all going to be hunky dory. We are now in the crisis management mode on this
00:15:47.620 issue where, hey, it's not gonna be white smoke. We're talking to them about this. We're still preparing
00:15:52.500 for the Kuzma USMCA renegotiation next year. What? We're now preparing for something that's
00:15:59.620 only going to start happening next year instead of trying to solve the real problem that is in
00:16:05.780 front of us right now. We're going to solve the thing that we only start talking about next year
00:16:10.500 and may not be fully renegotiated for another couple of years after that. But whatever, what do I
00:16:15.860 know? I'm not Mark Carney, the genius economist, businessman, Goldman Sachs banker, central banker.
00:16:24.100 But that should be it for me today, guys. Again, if you like the show, make sure to leave a like on
00:16:28.900 this video, subscribe if you are not yet a subscriber, and leave a comment on what you
00:16:34.100 think about the topic. Anyways, with that being said, see you guys all later.