Carney opposes Poilievre's plan to keep violent criminals locked up!
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
169.46033
Summary
Purepoly of the Conservatives says the Supreme Court of Canada should use the notwithstanding clause to keep criminals behind bars, even if the courts don't like it. Mark Carney's response to the matter is hilarious, and Purepoly's is even funnier.
Transcript
00:00:02.780
So we have crime becoming a big wedge issue in the 2025 federal election in Canada,
00:00:09.060
in part because the Liberals don't take it seriously.
00:00:13.140
Pure poly of the Conservatives saying something sensible on crime
00:00:16.400
has somehow turned into something that the Liberals think is very controversial,
00:00:21.400
because they may want criminals locked up despite what the courts say.
00:00:26.160
I am 100% fine with pure poly of the Conservatives using the notwithstanding clause
00:00:35.160
There is nothing against the Charter with mandatory minimums,
00:00:38.740
so we should be using the notwithstanding clause in order to enforce them if the courts get in the way.
00:00:44.980
I want to cut over to a clip of poly of talking about this in just a second.
00:00:48.660
I want to then jump over to what Mark Carney's response to all this is,
00:00:54.420
But before I get into it, guys, make sure to like this video,
00:00:57.600
subscribe to the channel if you're not yet a subscriber,
00:01:02.780
What do you think about the use of the notwithstanding clause?
00:01:05.320
Where is it appropriate? Where do you think it's not appropriate?
00:01:08.260
But now, without further ado, here is pure poly of answering a journalist's question
00:01:12.480
about the use of the notwithstanding clause in reference to crime.
00:01:17.640
The question was, will you use it for other things?
00:01:23.780
And the answer is, we will only use Section 33 to fight crime.
00:01:30.460
We will only use it to end the liberal crime wave,
00:01:33.860
which they have unleashed with catch-and-release, hug-a-thug laws.
00:01:37.760
We will reverse all of those laws, and we will bring in the biggest crime crackdown
00:01:43.580
in Canadian history to protect the constitutional charter rights of Canadians
00:01:56.420
I should just say one last thing, because after the last liberal decade
00:02:01.420
of skyrocketing crime and costs of living, we cannot afford a fourth term.
00:02:09.300
We need a change, a change with a new conservative government
00:02:14.220
so you can have food that you afford, homes you can afford,
00:02:18.000
streets that you're safe on, and a paycheck that grows faster than your cost of living.
00:02:24.880
Is there an example of when a mass murderer has been set free?
00:02:29.640
Does the parole board not usually rule against that?
00:02:33.400
Well, the problem is that the ruling just happened in 2022.
00:02:41.500
So the clock started ticking on these cases in that year.
00:02:47.820
So what we will see is 25 years forward, these offenders will be eligible for parole.
00:02:53.820
And when you kill six people, you should never be eligible for parole.
00:03:01.960
You should never be able to force the families of the victims to have to come and testify at a parole hearing
00:03:07.740
so that they relive the hell that you've exacted on them.
00:03:12.820
I like how many questions he's getting from the media on this specific topic,
00:03:17.340
as if what he is saying is somehow like, you know, a little beyond the pale.
00:03:21.520
I can't believe he would say something like this.
00:03:23.720
I need to bring up the funniest reaction to it before I cut over to Mark Carney.
00:03:27.720
Rachel Gilmore reacted to this saying, whoa, Paulyov's announcement today,
00:03:33.180
he would invoke the notwithstanding clause to overturn a Supreme Court ruling and make sure multiple murderers die in prison.
00:03:40.180
This would make him the first prime minister to override the charter using the notwithstanding clause.
00:03:44.920
And over time, it's been made very clear that Rachel Gilmore was not saying this because it was just big news or something like that.
00:03:52.840
She was saying this because she openly opposes the use of the notwithstanding clause to keep murderers locked up,
00:03:59.700
as if that is a big tragedy that murderers will not be able to get out in their lifetimes.
00:04:05.020
Even then, I support the use of the notwithstanding clause in order to overturn all these stupid bail rulings from judges,
00:04:13.820
letting multiple-time violent offenders just out of jail before their trial,
00:04:18.220
even though they've repeatedly shown that they cannot handle it.
00:04:21.880
Here is the purpose of jail and the criminal justice system.
00:04:27.100
If you are dangerous, if you are incapable of staying out of trouble pre-trial,
00:04:33.800
But we have this ridiculous system where if the prosecution wants to keep dangerous criminals
00:04:40.320
or repeat offenders in prison or jail before trial,
00:04:46.360
they need to literally bend over backwards to make an argument in front of a judge
00:04:51.040
in which if it's a very liberal judge, they'll just dismiss it and say that the guy who stabbed somebody
00:04:56.020
can go back out in the streets and we'll just hope that he actually shows up for his trial.
00:04:59.560
It's ridiculous, which means that prosecutors don't even bother at this point because it's such a waste
00:05:06.080
of time. Now I want to jump over to Mark Carney's reaction is absolutely insane that he thinks that this is
00:05:14.600
somehow a good angle of attack on Polyev that, oh my goodness, Polyev is going to use the notwithstanding
00:05:22.060
Chair Polyev announced today he would use the notwithstanding clause to push through his tough-on-crime
00:05:28.580
agenda. Is there any case you'd invoke the clause to override the Charter?
00:05:31.780
I think this is a very dangerous step. We have a Charter of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in this country
00:05:41.760
and it's the responsibility, in my view, of the Prime Minister, of the Government of Canada to defend
00:05:49.620
that Charter, those fundamental rights and responsibilities and liberties that Canadians enjoy.
00:05:55.920
The guy supported the use of the Emergencies Act to suspend Canadians' charter rights. What is he talking about?
00:06:05.220
This is a very dangerous step. Locking up criminals, apparently actual criminals, is the dangerous step here.
00:06:11.060
Not lockdowns, not mandates, not the Emergency Act use and freezing bank accounts.
00:06:16.000
It's when we're making sure that Paul Bernardo doesn't get to come up in front of bail hearings or parole hearings anymore.
00:06:24.520
The politicizing certain issues with respect to fundamental rights is a slippery slope that leads to further politicization.
00:06:40.200
And I understand if I was correctly briefed, it won't surprise you I didn't watch Mr. Polyev's press conference,
00:06:50.120
but if I was correctly briefed, that it relates to issues of heinous crimes and murderers.
00:06:59.120
So he even knows that we're talking about heinous crimes and murderers not being allowed parole,
00:07:06.540
and he is still saying it's a dangerous, it's a dangerous precedent that Polyev is setting.
00:07:12.380
So he's fully aware of what he's speaking on, and he still thinks this is dangerous.
00:07:17.060
I think that the notwithstanding clause should be even used more liberally than what Polyev is talking about.
00:07:22.300
I think any person who commits a violent offense, unless disputed, if it's on camera, they should not be let out of jail pre-trial.
00:07:30.800
Especially if it's a public offense against a stranger.
00:07:33.520
Because if someone's attacking a random stranger, do you think that that person's not going to attack somebody else if you let them out before trial?
00:07:40.320
Especially because they know they're probably going to get locked up.
00:07:42.540
They might just do whatever the heck they want at that point.
00:07:44.600
Being tough on crime, and being tough starts with being smart on crime.
00:07:50.180
And it includes being tough on guns and gun violence.
00:07:54.900
And I know that, with regret, that Mr. Polyev has voted against every single gun control measure
00:08:03.260
during his very long career as a career politician and member of the House of Commons.
00:08:12.940
It is Farmer Brown's shotgun that is the problem.
00:08:16.640
Not the fact that because the liberals have not secured the border over 10 years,
00:08:20.980
and in fact they actually keep passing laws to lower offenses for carrying actual illegally obtained guns,
00:08:29.060
If we were locking people up, if we were not appointing liberal judges all over the place
00:08:34.180
who don't like locking up criminals, we wouldn't have this problem.
00:08:37.040
But the liberals would rather disarm people who have never committed an offense in their lives,
00:08:47.020
They are the ones who are now going to have to be punished
00:08:50.120
because a bunch of Somali gang members are shooting each other up the streets of Toronto.
00:09:00.160
And I hope that Polly at the debates absolutely smacks them for this,
00:09:04.380
that they have been letting gangsters run around, shooting each other without cracking down on them,
00:09:08.940
and in fact making it easier for those people to operate while going after people
00:09:12.740
who are literally one-third as likely to commit a violent offense as the average person in Canada.
00:09:17.760
Gun owners because you lose your gun license if you commit a violent crime,
00:09:21.640
or I think even certain other, like if you shoplift, you would lose your gun, I believe.
00:09:25.960
I think that would be a criminal offense worthy of getting your gun license pulled.
00:09:32.800
This would be really stupid to when you lose so many privileges by doing it.
00:09:37.920
But yeah, now I want to jump back over to Pierre Polyev,
00:09:41.400
because even though these are the same press conferences,
00:09:43.880
they can have been kind of dueling back and forth,
00:09:45.920
knowing each other's talking points on these issues,
00:09:47.980
and he probably have responded to the sort of perspective on crime that Mark Carney has.
00:09:52.900
And Mark Carney has said he will not change any of the catch-and-release liberal laws.
00:09:58.200
Like so many elites who don't have to feel the effects of their policies, he agrees with them.
00:10:09.020
He spent most of his adult life not even living in Canada.
00:10:11.940
He has no idea what it's like to feel endangered in his community.
00:10:15.580
With Mark Carney, you will get four more years of the same out-of-touch liberal catch-and-release laws
00:10:22.360
that have caused the problem in the first place.
00:10:24.820
So the question is, do I respect Supreme Court decisions?
00:10:31.040
And I also respect the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
00:10:34.140
which guarantees life, liberty, and the security of the person to every single Canadian.
00:10:41.080
That right has been trampled on by the Liberals' catch-and-release laws
00:10:48.000
that have unleashed crime and chaos in our communities.
00:10:52.360
And I will use Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
00:10:58.520
to put an end to the liberal crime and drug wave
00:11:03.800
and to protect law-abiding Canadians against the dangers
00:11:12.860
I would be suggesting to Polyev that in a debate, this is a great...
00:11:17.520
The thing is that it might not be true to most people,
00:11:24.560
but people living in those sort of mixed suburban-urban ridings
00:11:29.100
that the Conservatives need to be able to win this election,
00:11:32.180
hitting on crime heavily will move a lot of voters.
00:11:35.780
And I think going after Carney as an out-of-touch liberal elite
00:11:38.940
who doesn't actually have to suffer with the consequences
00:11:41.920
of his own bad policies and actions is a great thing to do.
00:11:45.200
That this man doesn't matter if he crashes the economy, he will be fine.
00:11:49.060
Whereas Polyev actually has grown up and still lives in a world
00:11:53.340
where if the economy goes south, it could actually affect his own standard of living.
00:11:58.380
You know, he probably has had a good amount of savings over time,
00:12:01.480
having been an elected official for quite a length of time.
00:12:05.100
But there's a difference between Polyev maybe having millions of dollars
00:12:09.040
and Carney having tens of millions of dollars, if not like $100 million.
00:12:13.740
That the man should be slapped at for wanting to keep around the Trudeau-era policies
00:12:19.060
that have made people's lives worse because it doesn't really seem to be a big deal to him
00:12:25.120
It's not that things have to affect you personally for you to take it seriously,
00:12:28.680
but it just demonstrates how out-of-touch a person Carney is.
00:12:32.080
If it doesn't affect him personally, it seems like he doesn't take it seriously.
00:12:38.680
I do hope that the Conservatives really hone in on this.
00:12:42.000
In fact, I could have brought up the stats, but I know you guys don't want me
00:12:48.300
Crime in Canada since 2015 has literally gone up.
00:12:51.860
Violent crime has gone up 30% across the country.
00:12:54.580
In provinces like BC, it's gone up 50% in part because of the combination of terrible policies
00:13:08.720
This is a major, major sore point for the liberals, and they are literally unwilling
00:13:15.020
They're wanting to hire more cops, crack down more on guns, but it's literally taking the
00:13:19.240
same policies they already had, microwaving them, and then just doing them more.
00:13:26.740
Saying that for the second time because I end up trailing off.
00:13:29.040
Make sure to like the video, subscribe to the channel, leave a comment, do all that great
00:13:36.360
I'm going to probably go door knocking for Barbara Ball shortly here, just making sure
00:13:40.420
that I have content to put out throughout the day while I'm talking to liberals and conservatives