The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Carney's BIG polling problem, many swing back Conservative (CPC lead 10%)

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I want to make this video today to throw a bucket of cold water on all the liberals who feel like now that Mark Carney has replaced Justin Trudeau as the Liberal Party leader, now they have a really good chance of winning the next federal election.

00:00:18.320 Nay nay, that is not what is going to happen. When you actually look at the consistent polling, the polling done by pollsters whose numbers aren't all over the place, it shows that while the liberals have received a bump in the polling because the leader is no longer Justin Trudeau, that doesn't actually mean that Canadians like them still.

00:00:38.380 I am discounting pretty much any pollster who cannot give me consistent numbers on who's ahead and who is behind. I am putting Leger in the corner of shame and it must now wear the hat of shame because two weeks ago they said the conservatives were leading by three points.

00:00:56.080 And then last week they said the conservatives are leading by 13 points. And just yesterday they said the conservatives are now tied with the liberals.

00:01:04.900 That is not how polling works. That is not how public opinion changes. You go sit in the corner of shame.

00:01:11.200 The only two pollsters I am following at this point are Abacus Data and Innovative Research because they actually seem to understand how to reduce response bias in their polls.

00:01:21.760 Make sure that their polls are not just being given to people in Starbucks lineups in downtown Toronto, making it look like the liberals are surging even in southwest Ontario when working class men are the big stumbling block for the Liberal Party right now.

00:01:37.340 That is one of the big issues going on right now for the Liberal Party.

00:01:41.560 Mark Carney can look silly wearing a hat at a steel plant and that is not bringing back the men who have basically been talked down to by the Liberal Party for 10 years at this point and are not considering voting for them anymore.

00:01:55.260 It's just not in the cards.

00:01:57.340 Most of the gains that the liberals have been making, even in these pollsters I like, they have been gaining in even these polls, has mostly been among people in suburban or urban areas and mostly women.

00:02:09.540 And the issue for the Liberals is those voters are still more accessible to the Conservatives than men and people who work in trades are to the Liberals.

00:02:20.500 So there is a kind of issue where the Conservatives are ahead and their lead is shrinking, but they're quickly starting to hit their floor.

00:02:28.160 The floor for the Conservatives, at least in my opinion, is 38%.

00:02:32.740 They are never going to fall below 38%, which is a pretty comfortable floor considering they only got 34% in 2021.

00:02:40.960 I would be shocked if they got below 40% in the federal election and really all they need is about 41.5% to 42% in order to secure a majority.

00:02:50.420 And I want to take you guys through today the innovative research polls from last week and this week, last week showing them only up on the Liberals by 7% and this week showing them up by 10% and specifically the demographic groups that Mark Carney is having a problem with.

00:03:06.960 They even pull Mark Carney's approval rating and it's now slipping down from the positives to the negatives and he's only seen as well as Pierre Polyev is, which is not great for a Liberal because you have tons of media propaganda on your side.

00:03:22.200 And if people are already mostly not liking him, that's a big problem.

00:03:27.680 Conservatives are used to having negative approval ratings because there's so much anti-Conservative propaganda, about 50% of Canadians will just say, oh, it's the Conservative, well, I suppose I don't like him.

00:03:39.540 Where a lot of people tend to give the Liberal or the NDP leader a lot more of the benefit of the doubt.

00:03:45.200 Anyways, before I get into the innovative research poll, guys, just make sure to like this video, subscribe to the channel, comment, do all that great stuff.

00:03:55.500 In fact, share this video with any of your panicking Conservative friends who think Mark Carney is some big political juggernaut and he is going to, like, steal Pierre Polyev's soul in the next election.

00:04:06.680 It's not happening. Mark Carney is still a boring, uncharismatic leader.

00:04:10.540 You know, we rejected Stefan Dion, we rejected Michael Ignatieff, I don't know why suddenly Canadians would be, like, pro-Carney.

00:04:18.280 There is not enough Trump propaganda on the planet to make Pierre Polyev look bad, especially as Trump has condemned him.

00:04:25.380 And also, people don't really care because people care about domestic issues.

00:04:29.760 Anyways, here is the innovative research poll from last week.

00:04:34.400 This is actually the personality test they give to people before they poll them.

00:04:38.400 It makes sure that they're not having massive outlier polls because they're ensuring that, you know, the personality of Canadians are not going to shift massively overnight.

00:04:49.480 So, they break up people into these different categories as pay-as-you-go moderates, populist Conservatives, deferential Conservatives, business Liberals, left Liberals, and core left.

00:05:00.780 This poll from last week actually seemed to have more core left, left Liberals and business Liberals than usual.

00:05:08.020 And even in this poll, where those demographics are, like, at 61% or something like that, 64%, even in this poll, with not as many Conservatives and moderates polled, the Conservatives were still leading by seven points.

00:05:22.740 And that's because, and I'll just scroll down here quickly, see they are leading 38 to 31, NDP at 16.

00:05:30.140 This is also why I trust innovative research.

00:05:33.280 Are the NDP floundering right now with Jagmeet Singh as their completely toothless leader?

00:05:38.840 Sure, but the NDP is fundamentally a cult, and about 14% of people are, like, blood-bound to vote for them every single election, whether they have a chance or not.

00:05:49.300 So I think it's fairly realistic.

00:05:51.940 They're going to lose a couple points or so, but they're not going to exactly crater.

00:05:56.100 But they actually poll people on their personality types and who they're planning on voting for, if they have it here.

00:06:03.920 I'm trying to find it.

00:06:05.900 Or do they not have it?

00:06:07.880 I've seen it before.

00:06:09.200 If they don't have it here, then it's just this, for some reason, this one was the one that they didn't include it.

00:06:13.660 But it's the business Liberals that currently the Liberal Party is suffering with.

00:06:17.780 A lot of business Liberals will not vote Liberal.

00:06:21.100 I think I do have it in the next one, so maybe I'll just pull that one up.

00:06:23.880 But last week, they're behind by 7.

00:06:27.100 Or they're, yeah, the Liberals are behind by 7.

00:06:29.100 Conservatives are up by 7.

00:06:30.300 This week, the Conservatives are up by 10.

00:06:33.740 And I want to show you that this being a more, I think, realistic mix of people voting, there's a few more moderates.

00:06:41.600 There's a few less business Liberals, left Liberals, and core left people, and a couple extra populist and deferential Conservatives.

00:06:49.280 That in this environment, the Conservatives are actually able to gain a pretty massive lead of 37 to 28.

00:06:58.160 And I do believe with those undecided voters, they're mostly probably going to be splitting towards the Conservatives.

00:07:04.320 And here is the problem, too.

00:07:07.600 This is the leadership aspect of it all.

00:07:10.480 Mark Carney, when he first announced, was polling at probably a plus 2 or a plus 3.

00:07:16.060 And then for a brief bit of time, he was polling around, you know, plus 7, plus 9.

00:07:21.560 And that's natural that he's not going to be wildly popular or wildly unpopular when he first announces, because nobody knows anything about him.

00:07:30.280 For a long time, Pierre Polyev, or just Conservative leaders in general, had very bad reputations, being in the negative 20 or 15 range.

00:07:39.220 When Polyev became Conservative leader, after several months, when it got into the spring and summer of 2023, he started getting a positive approval rating.

00:07:48.920 Again, because of anti-Conservative propaganda, he was only ever hovering around, like, plus 4, plus 5 or so.

00:07:56.020 But that is a big win for the Conservatives.

00:07:58.220 Back in around February or December-ish, then he dipped down when the Liberal leadership race was going on.

00:08:04.960 And people who were maybe default Liberals, who couldn't bring themselves to vote Liberal again, knowing that, hey, it might be a better leader.

00:08:12.760 It might not be Justin Trudeau anymore.

00:08:14.380 Then they kind of turned on the Conservatives for a brief bit to see what was going on.

00:08:18.940 And now you'll see, as the Liberal leadership race was kind of finishing up, and it was very clear it was going to be Mark Carney, basically 95% chance it was going to be him.

00:08:27.900 And it was almost guaranteed to be him, because it was effectively a WWE-staged leadership race.

00:08:33.740 Now, Polyev has jumped back up.

00:08:36.700 He's at negative 4.

00:08:37.660 Not amazing, but it's actually pretty decent for a Conservative.

00:08:40.220 But Mark Carney is now at a negative 3% rating, very early on to his leadership, despite constant gushing coverage of his campaign, constant gushing coverage of his resume.

00:08:53.040 And again, Canadians are not going to vote for people based on their resumes.

00:08:58.760 We are not French voters in France who need politicians to write very eloquent-sounding memoirs before the campaign to show that they're literary men and women, even though they still suck at their jobs.

00:09:11.980 We more so care about, hey, what's the person's actual record?

00:09:15.240 And as Mark Carney's record has come out, it hasn't been great.

00:09:18.280 Now, I want to show you guys another poll that I think is quite telling.

00:09:25.620 There is a poll question that Innovative Research has been asking people, that the poll question goes like this on screen.

00:09:34.540 They ask people, do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

00:09:38.020 And it says, the Liberals may have their problems, but they're still the best party to form government.

00:09:43.960 Strongly agree is 17%.

00:09:46.000 That makes sense.

00:09:47.420 The Liberals are at around, you know, 28%, 27%.

00:09:51.200 Obviously, there's going to be a base who says that they're the best.

00:09:54.400 Somewhat agree is 22%.

00:09:55.940 Neither agree nor disagree is 17%.

00:09:58.940 And then you have somewhat disagree 10%, strongly disagree 31%, and don't know 3%.

00:10:04.940 Remember, too, that somewhat agree and neither agree nor disagree are going to have people who vote NDP and block in it and green as well, because they know they can't form government.

00:10:16.000 Right now, the Liberals are running with a soft base of 13% core Liberals and 9% soft Liberals who are effectively the people they're having to rely on.

00:10:27.900 They don't even have above a 20% core base of Liberals who think that they are the best people for the job.

00:10:35.180 The problem there is that the Conservatives, and what you'll see is there are, on this own bar graph, in this question, the people who were not in favor of the Liberals forming government, 28% are rated as hostile to the Liberals.

00:10:49.100 And 23% are soft anti-Liberal party.

00:10:53.820 That is horrible.

00:10:55.520 The Liberals literally have, like, a half to a third of the people that would hate them like them enough that they're probably going to vote for them.

00:11:05.780 And I say probably because 13% are definitely, 9% are generally committed but could be swayed.

00:11:11.920 And that's the problem.

00:11:13.520 I want to go find if I can find the chart of men right now.

00:11:17.100 The problem that they have is that they are relying, again, like I've been saying, on voters who are actually more likely to switch to the Conservatives than Conservatives are relying on voters who might switch to the Liberals.

00:11:28.440 I'm trying to find other things here.

00:11:35.480 I don't need to cover that anymore.

00:11:37.000 I can jump onto another one.

00:11:38.200 They don't have the gender stuff. 1.00

00:11:39.320 This is always the annoying thing with pollsters, is that they'll have great poll results, but then by the next poll, they stop showing you as much detail.

00:11:47.220 But yes, the main gain, actually, that the Conservatives have made, outside of just men in general, has specifically been people who work in private sector unions.

00:11:55.980 Those people who work on construction sites, oil rigs, who work in even grocery stores and whatnot, they don't like the inflation the Liberals have brought on.

00:12:05.120 They don't like the carbon tax.

00:12:06.860 And Carney can try and run away from it. 1.00

00:12:08.660 But the problem is right now, the advertisements already write themselves.

00:12:12.600 And I'm also going to show you guys the chart of the current polls, because I think it also gives the lie to some pollsters, like being on to something when they can't seem to decide where they actually stand on how the Liberals and Conservatives are doing.

00:12:26.680 It's like, so look at that.

00:12:27.920 Leger, back on March 1st, 13% Conservative.

00:12:33.480 Yesterday, or on the 9th, it's a tie.

00:12:36.140 Sorry, but I don't believe you.

00:12:39.180 But let's just quickly jump into abacus data here, because they do good breakdowns of gender. 1.00

00:12:45.800 This is just going to be my point.

00:12:47.300 They're saying plus 12, Conservative.

00:12:49.280 You know, maybe read that on a bit of a curve.

00:12:51.220 Assume there may be a couple points underneath, just for the sake of argument.

00:12:55.780 Let's go see what men and women are currently thinking about this government and economy.

00:13:00.580 Oh, and here's a great chart.

00:13:02.180 Time for change or re-elect the Liberals?

00:13:04.480 While this was last week, there are only 20% of people who think the Liberals should be re-elected.

00:13:11.400 Is that better than where they were last year?

00:13:14.000 Yeah, like a few points better.

00:13:15.800 It's basically where they were in August of 2023, and they were not doing well back then.

00:13:20.520 So they are currently at August 2023 numbers, when the Liberals were in full panic mode.

00:13:25.480 And yet, I'm supposed to be panicking as a Conservative, believing that the Liberals are making a big comeback when they are at the numbers where the Liberals knew they were screwed back in August.

00:13:37.340 And again, most people think it's generally time for change, but yeah, and there are good alternatives.

00:13:42.500 48% believe that it's time for change, and there are good alternatives.

00:13:45.520 32% still want change, but they're not sure if there are good alternatives.

00:13:49.860 And those people can be swayed if they see enough good messaging from different parties.

00:13:55.740 And they also found the same thing.

00:13:58.440 Look at Mark Carney.

00:13:59.780 His disapproval rating is climbing up faster than his approval rating has been.

00:14:04.380 He got an initial shock of approval at the very start because he was running for the Liberals, so a bunch of Liberals start saying they like him.

00:14:10.280 But since then, he went from 33 to 36 in three or four weeks, but he went from 20 to 26 in those same three or four weeks.

00:14:21.120 And now I just want to quickly move on to the gender stuff because I do think it is a good, you know, I think it is a good general study of what people are thinking.

00:14:32.280 Here's men and women in this poll that puts the Conservatives plus 12 ahead of the Liberals.

00:14:40.700 Again, assume it's over-polling the Conservatives by a couple of points.

00:14:44.140 I'm not even sure about that.

00:14:45.880 Men, the Conservatives are winning 44%.

00:14:48.340 The Liberals are only winning 29.

00:14:52.000 But you go to women, on this one, the Conservatives are still winning 39 to 30. 0.99

00:14:56.000 Even if you tighten that up more, the Liberals need to be decisively winning one of the genders or they are going to lose. 0.99

00:15:03.160 Because the Conservatives are already decisively winning men, like by double digits.

00:15:08.200 They are winning them, what is that, 15-point lead on men, whereas the Conservatives still have a 9-point lead.

00:15:16.140 Even if that shrinks down and they're tied on women, the Conservatives still win. 0.98

00:15:20.000 The Liberals are only, right now, gaining ground when it comes to, like, urban and suburban areas that they already won back in 2021.

00:15:31.000 They're still in the rebuilding phase.

00:15:34.220 But anyways, one thing I do want to address here is that, can the Conservatives lose?

00:15:40.900 Of course, literally any party can win or lose because things happen.

00:15:45.880 I think right now, the election is really deciding, are the Conservatives going to get a majority government or a minority government?

00:15:53.240 And in effect, you could say a minority is a loss because the rhetoric coming out of the Liberals and the NDP and the Greens and the Bloc are that the Conservatives are so bad, maybe the Bloc would work with them.

00:16:04.700 But in general, the Conservatives are so bad, we have to stop them.

00:16:08.900 And it would be hypocritical of them to then say, well, Conservatives got a minority government, we'll let them govern for a couple of years.

00:16:15.280 They would probably just form a coalition to keep the Conservatives out.

00:16:19.140 So it is the Conservative Party's duty right now to not just win, but win hard.

00:16:24.980 And this is why I bring up, guys, you need to be focused on the win.

00:16:31.040 I hate it whenever the polls start slipping, the Conservatives lose confidence in themselves, and they start circling the wagons and playing it safe.

00:16:39.940 Sorry, was Polyev gaining massive popularity from playing it safe? 0.96

00:16:43.720 Are any of the big issues that the Liberals are currently unpopular with soft, moderate issues?

00:16:50.820 No, they're very passionate issues about crime, immigration, taxation, drugs, parental rights.

00:16:59.440 These are all hot-blooded political issues.

00:17:01.980 And if you start getting scared of them because they have a controversial tint to them, even if most people agree with you, you will lose.

00:17:08.560 And I say this with affection.

00:17:11.960 The Conservatives basically never win any elections.

00:17:15.680 The Conservative Party of Canada does not win elections.

00:17:18.420 They simply wait for the Liberals to lose the elections.

00:17:21.480 And I deeply hope that is not what they are doing in the year 2025,

00:17:26.340 after seeing that tactic lose in 2021, in 2019, and 2015. 0.99

00:17:32.980 Playing it safe and hoping people pick you after looking at the other guys is stupid. 0.99

00:17:38.000 Mark Carney is trying to seize the initiative. 1.00

00:17:41.520 He is bad at it because he is an uncharismatic, boring, corrupt individual.

00:17:45.160 But he can do it if the Conservatives decide to sit down and say, 0.53

00:17:48.520 let's just say nothing and do nothing and hope that people vote for us anyways.

00:17:52.440 No, you guys should actually become more hawkish on the issues.

00:17:56.840 Every winning campaign needs one big, audacious policy that you run on.

00:18:01.900 One or two.

00:18:02.940 I think that they should be capping immigration at 100,000.

00:18:06.800 The Conservatives rolled out their cap and said,

00:18:09.440 well, it's 200,000 to 250,000, depending on how many houses are built in a year.

00:18:13.600 No, no, no.

00:18:14.940 Because guess what?

00:18:15.900 The worst possible campaign promises are ones your opponents could also make.

00:18:20.800 Mark Carney could say 250,000 and his base wouldn't abandon him.

00:18:24.480 You want to say a number that if Mark Carney tried to match you on,

00:18:28.200 his Liberal progressives would run away from him because he's betrayed them and he's turned conservative.

00:18:33.800 100,000 is also just smart policy in general.

00:18:36.640 We've had way too much immigration, so you can't just bring it back to even. 1.00

00:18:40.140 You need to have a deficit of immigration for a while in order so that people who are currently living at home with their parents 1.00

00:18:47.380 and can't buy an apartment or a condo or a starter home have the room to actually be able to actually explore the housing market.

00:18:54.500 Because bringing in the same amount of immigrants as there are houses being built 0.97

00:18:58.240 is just going to basically guarantee that prices stay extremely high

00:19:02.180 and there is no supply for people to compete for who currently want it or who are in the country right now.

00:19:08.160 Another one.

00:19:09.080 Guys, getting rid of the carbon tax is a great policy.

00:19:12.400 Now, we should be pivoting towards saying,

00:19:15.840 guess what?

00:19:16.680 2% across the board tax reduction in the first year of the government.

00:19:21.020 And by the fourth year, I want the tax burden in this country on the federal level

00:19:25.460 to fall from 15% to 20%.

00:19:29.220 We should have Canadians, corporations, every individual overall paying 18% less taxes on average

00:19:38.300 because that's how you lower prices.

00:19:40.560 You can't lower prices by lowering regulations or just getting rid of the carbon tax.

00:19:44.200 Will that help things?

00:19:45.360 Sure, but it's not the majority of the problem.

00:19:46.940 The majority of the problem is the fact that Canadians in the upper tax brackets

00:19:50.900 pay 33% of their income in taxes.

00:19:54.460 Even the bottom tiers are like 12% and 15%.

00:19:57.540 Our country is severely overtaxed.

00:20:01.420 So you have to run on a big, audacious tax cut.

00:20:05.680 You need to run on, like, willing to use the notwithstanding clause.

00:20:11.040 If judges try and strike down mandatory minimum sentences from rapists

00:20:15.300 and, you know, repeat violent offenders.

00:20:18.500 Everyone wants to say, that sounds dictatorial.

00:20:20.580 Everyone understands that judges are the issue

00:20:22.580 and nobody is against the notwithstanding clause when it makes sense.

00:20:26.120 Run on something controversial that gets people talking

00:20:28.720 because when people talk, what they will eventually conclude is,

00:20:31.860 well, you know, Pierre's kind of right.

00:20:33.440 Even if the Toronto Star, the Red Star, is condemning you,

00:20:37.000 if you stand for the right issues,

00:20:39.420 people from listening to it a few times will be like,

00:20:42.540 well, he's kind of right.

00:20:43.440 I don't really care about the liberals trying to woke scold him

00:20:45.820 for saying that because he's kind of right.

00:20:47.740 This happened in British Columbia.

00:20:49.560 The BC Conservative HQ team would get cold feet

00:20:51.980 about something purely sensible a candidate said

00:20:54.300 and they would say, can you please shut up about that?

00:20:56.420 Even if 80% of people heard what the person said,

00:20:58.980 they would have agreed with them.

00:21:00.460 Just say things that people agree with

00:21:02.680 that other campaigns are unwilling to say.

00:21:05.560 Saying things that everyone can agree with universally, 1.00

00:21:07.780 no matter the ideology, is stupid 1.00

00:21:09.420 because elections are not won on things 1.00

00:21:11.920 that everyone already agrees on.

00:21:13.560 It's won on things that a plurality,

00:21:16.040 a majority of people agree on,

00:21:17.780 but the current minority position is what rules.

00:21:21.280 Immigration is a great one. 0.53

00:21:22.940 Crime is a great one.

00:21:23.980 Drugs are a great one.

00:21:25.200 Parental rights are a great one.

00:21:26.880 Target those issues and you will win way more voters.

00:21:30.060 Stop taking your foot off the gas

00:21:31.780 because that's how you will lose a race. 1.00

00:21:33.720 It legitimately is as stupid as being in an actual NASCAR race 1.00

00:21:39.760 and you're currently 100 meters ahead of your opponent 1.00

00:21:43.280 but they're closing the gap.

00:21:44.580 So you take your foot off the gas

00:21:46.160 in order to think that,

00:21:47.920 well, I just don't want to touch anything

00:21:49.440 so I want to maintain my lead

00:21:50.680 so we're just going to touch nothing

00:21:51.880 because we're currently ahead

00:21:53.020 and me making any turns,

00:21:54.720 me putting my foot on the gas or anything,

00:21:56.360 that's a decision

00:21:57.140 and I'm going to stop making decisions

00:21:58.340 to try and maintain this lead.

00:22:00.140 You and I both know how illogical that would be.

00:22:02.060 We would say, no, you're ahead.

00:22:03.480 Keep trying to become even more ahead

00:22:05.200 if you take your foot off the gas.

00:22:06.780 That is what is, in fact, going to make you fall behind.

00:22:11.300 But I digress.

00:22:13.260 Anyways, so that's it for me today, guys.

00:22:15.860 If you agree with my takes, by the way,

00:22:17.560 you should sign up to my website,

00:22:19.120 wyattclaypool.com,

00:22:20.540 linked in the description below

00:22:21.920 as well as pinned in the comments.

00:22:23.880 I just do that so that if there's ever

00:22:25.300 a good nomination race going on

00:22:27.040 and there's a good amount of you

00:22:28.220 who live in that riding area,

00:22:30.160 I can call you,

00:22:30.940 I can email you

00:22:32.160 and let you know a couple good candidates

00:22:34.020 that you should consider

00:22:34.920 so that we have the most conservative

00:22:36.540 and the most winnable candidates

00:22:38.800 in every single riding.

00:22:41.160 That's another thing.

00:22:42.180 Conservatives,

00:22:43.000 get a hold of your nomination processes.

00:22:45.400 When you pick bland candidates from above,

00:22:48.560 what you will have is bland results.

00:22:51.340 In fact, I had a great idea from,

00:22:53.760 this was given to me by a politician

00:22:55.380 currently sitting in office somewhere in Canada.

00:22:57.340 They said, in urban ridings,

00:22:59.820 the conservatives should just appoint candidates.

00:23:02.140 And that's not because they shouldn't respect

00:23:03.940 nomination processes.

00:23:05.500 It's that nobody even wants these candidates.

00:23:07.820 So by holding a nomination,

00:23:08.920 they're wasting time

00:23:09.580 because they usually have to convince people

00:23:10.940 to run anyways who don't really want to

00:23:13.040 because they know they're going to get beat.

00:23:15.400 Appoint a candidate early

00:23:16.400 and appoint somebody who's slightly eccentric

00:23:18.680 because they can get attention in a city riding

00:23:21.160 where campaigning is very tough.

00:23:22.820 Why do you think Rob Ford won the mayoral election in 2010?

00:23:28.680 He is an out-of-the-box eccentric candidate.

00:23:31.580 But guess what?

00:23:32.380 That got him attention

00:23:33.280 and it got attention on his message

00:23:35.340 of respecting taxpayers,

00:23:37.000 cutting wasteful spending,

00:23:38.340 and reducing commercial

00:23:40.200 and individual property taxes,

00:23:42.800 cracking down on crime,

00:23:43.800 and doing all that stuff.

00:23:46.200 Regardless.

00:23:46.920 Anyways, like, share, and subscribe, guys.

00:23:48.880 Thanks for watching the show.

00:23:50.320 See you guys all later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - March 12, 2025

Carney's BIG polling problem, many swing back Conservative (CPC lead 10%)

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript