The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Carney's Credibility Crumbles after 84,000 more jobs lost!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.

00:00:06.020 Remember when Mark Carney was pitched to Canadians as a savvy businessman and public finance wizard

00:00:11.920 who was going to get Canada's economy back on track? Well, Pepperidge Farms remembers.

00:00:17.720 But what I remember was that Mark Carney was literally the financial advisor to Justin Trudeau

00:00:24.120 in the last four and a half years of his prime ministership.

00:00:27.140 why did we think this guy was going to do a good job with Canada's economy?

00:00:32.220 Like, I know I didn't believe that and you didn't believe that,

00:00:35.620 but a lot of Canadians did fall for the whole idea that because Carney was once a Goldman Sachs man

00:00:41.240 and the governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England,

00:00:44.180 that he was somehow going to be good as prime minister for our economy

00:00:47.700 when his last credential was economic advisor to Trudeau

00:00:52.420 and the last four and a half years of Trudeau's government was terrible for Canada's economy and

00:00:57.920 that has continued. Just check out this headline right here. Breaking news. Canada's economy lost

00:01:05.060 net 83,900 jobs in February, driving Canada's unemployment rate up to 6.7%. Economists were

00:01:12.920 expecting a 10,000 gain according to Bloomberg's survey. Who the heck were those economists and

00:01:20.120 why are they not fired yet? Don't even bother firing them. Just throw them at the window, 0.84

00:01:23.980 because if you were that off, find a different career. Go and shine bowling shoes at a bowling

00:01:30.380 alley. My goodness. Yeah, Mark Carney's not very good at this, because it turns out that you can't

00:01:36.040 just subsidize your way into a one strong Canadian economy. I really like the post that my friend

00:01:43.060 JJ McCullough had made like a month ago, asking the question of when Mark Carney is going to stop

00:01:47.960 doing all of these meetings with different premiers so that we can break down interprovincial

00:01:52.500 trade barriers and just actually do it. He keeps promising to do things and then has a meeting

00:01:57.920 about it and then signs a document that doesn't actually do anything saying it's going to address

00:02:02.120 it, but we never actually get to the point where we do the thing. And I'm speaking vaguely because

00:02:07.500 it doesn't matter what Mark Carney has been promising, what I am saying applies to it. He

00:02:12.840 has accomplished nothing nothing you have to ask anyone who votes liberal and is planning on doing

00:02:19.640 it again what's your metric of success here how are you actually marking the report card for mark

00:02:27.080 carney how do you determine if he's doing a good job on the economy or not honestly it's like they

00:02:33.640 just put a color swatch up to him realize he doesn't have the the trump orange tan and say

00:02:38.460 Oh, he must be doing a brilliant job because he's not Donald Trump.

00:02:41.360 And it's like, oh, OK, that's that's nice.

00:02:44.880 America has a better economy than us.

00:02:46.620 So, yeah, all the anti-mega elbows up stuff is, you know, seemingly not working.

00:02:52.840 It's seemingly not putting us to new heights like we had read in the Globe and Mail letter to the editor a few months ago back in January.

00:03:00.060 This embarrassing letter to the editor where some guy was like, I have never imagined we were going to be at high like at heights this high.

00:03:07.100 we're on a new road to like you know wherever like nirvana or something like that no we are not

00:03:14.020 everything is sucking over the last couple of months i've been trying to give a lot of advice 0.52

00:03:19.300 to pure poly as conservatives because i think a major factor as to why the liberals are currently

00:03:24.260 leading in the polls is that the conservatives have a very indecisive or vague agenda you can't 0.99

00:03:30.380 just stand up and say the liberals are sucking at their job because well of course they suck at 1.00

00:03:34.960 their job. What are you going to do differently? And Polyev has been improving on that front, 1.00

00:03:39.820 at least on the trade issue as of late. He is giving good economic proposals. He's giving good

00:03:45.220 proposals on how to get to a trade deal with the United States, which upgrades him from simply

00:03:50.360 naysaying the liberals to saying, you guys are doing a bad job. Here is a better plan. And then

00:03:54.900 if Carney rejects those better plans, he looks like a complete moron because he hasn't been able 0.99

00:03:59.300 to do a good, like get the deal signed yet. So why are you saying that Polyev's plan is bad? 0.97

00:04:03.380 why not give it a try? But the biggest factor in the conservatives catching up to the liberals

00:04:09.340 is the fact the liberals eventually set everything on fire. Liberals still ahead in the polls right

00:04:15.300 now. I don't think that will hold up for another month and a half. I think the liberals are going

00:04:21.420 through like their second honeymoon right now, where they were artificially doing well in the

00:04:25.640 polls simply because Carney and Trump were at odds again. And for some reason, liberals love

00:04:30.640 it whenever they're fighting, even as the economy is just on fire around them. They will ignore that

00:04:36.400 just to watch Carney deliver just some pretentious speech at the World Economic Forum. Apparently

00:04:41.620 that's what really gets their goat and caused Matt Jenneru to cross the floor from the conservatives

00:04:46.680 to the liberals was Mark Carney's brilliant speech at Davos, which was just microwaved old

00:04:52.340 campaign rhetoric from him he had been delivering a year ago. But suddenly it gave Matt Jenneru

00:04:57.220 this road to Damascus moment. And now he's going to go join the liberals. But anyways, in this

00:05:02.640 video, I want to go over Mark Carney reacting to his own bad economic numbers, because it's been

00:05:09.140 embarrassing. Mark Carney doesn't actually really know how to justify himself here. Like he doesn't

00:05:15.360 have any, you know, promised, you know, better future that his policies will eventually lead to.

00:05:21.140 They were already supposed to be boost bolstering the economy right now. He's not saying give it a

00:05:25.800 year. He's not saying, you know, yes, it's early going. A lot of what I'm doing, it's two years

00:05:30.720 down the line, we are going to see the gains. No, no, he was pretending, he was trying to spin

00:05:35.640 previous data as being good for the country. Oh, wow, we had 150,000 job gains in December of 2025.

00:05:44.980 It's like, yeah, those are temporary holiday jobs like the economy takes on every year. And then in

00:05:51.280 January and February, it's been a bloodbath of just jobs leaving the economy left and right.

00:05:56.460 And we're not talking about just people exiting who are in those temporary jobs leaving. Even

00:06:00.840 when you completely factor out the temporary seasonal workers who came into the economy and

00:06:06.340 left, on net, we are losing massive amounts of people who are not seasonal workers. They are

00:06:12.320 people who are trying to work all the time, part-time or full-time workers. It's ridiculous. 0.98

00:06:17.320 us. So in just a second here, I want to show you Mark Carney's response to all this. But before we 0.84

00:06:22.760 get into it, I just want to remind you guys that if you like the show, make sure to leave a like

00:06:27.100 on this video, subscribe. If you are not yet a subscriber, hit that notification bell, leave a

00:06:32.160 comment about with what you think about this entire mess. And then if you want to help support

00:06:36.540 the show, I would greatly appreciate if you hit the join button below the video and make a small

00:06:41.760 contribution per month because YouTube, for some reason, has decided they want to execute my

00:06:46.800 channel and is basically not showing my videos to anyone but subscribers. So by adding a little

00:06:51.560 bit of money per month, it helps me keep this channel more sustainable over time. Anyways,

00:06:57.100 let's jump into this first video of Mark Carney reacting to the poor job numbers. This is just a

00:07:02.740 10 second clip, but we'll be getting into some longer ones in just a second here.

00:07:06.620 If you look at the performance of the labor market over the course of

00:07:10.640 the last six months, we've created over 80,000 jobs net over the last six months.

00:07:16.800 really, we have created 80,000 jobs net over the last six months. I don't need to be an economist

00:07:26.280 to tell you that's not true. Because he was ballyhooing about the fact that he had a bunch

00:07:32.080 of job gains in December that were completely wiped out in January. And even when you factored

00:07:37.060 out the seasonal, we lost like, I think it was like 80,000 or 120,000 or something like that,

00:07:42.440 90,000 in January and then we lost lost another 83,000 net we're not just saying we lost 83,000

00:07:49.120 and he's saying we gained 90,000 so we technically have a net gain of seven no no on net including

00:07:55.480 the job gains when you include job gains and job losses on net we're down minus 83 job 83,000 jobs

00:08:03.200 that's embarrassing again Goldman Sachs guy here how is this even possible here here is the longer

00:08:10.200 version of that clip of Carney trying to justify his time in office so far if you look at the

00:08:16.120 performance of the labor market over the course of uh the last six months uh we've created over

00:08:21.800 80 000 jobs net over the last six months the united states has created 6 000 jobs okay the

00:08:27.720 united states 11 times the size of our economy that that is not true i'm going to tell you that

00:08:35.720 is not true now maybe the american economy has only gained very few jobs but they've been gaining

00:08:43.080 jobs we have been losing them and there are going to be elbows up people out there like laura babcock

00:08:48.760 who are going to eat this stuff up and assume like oh yeah no canada number one canada number

00:08:53.160 one carney said that we've been gaining jobs massively we have not uh wages are growing at

00:08:59.480 4.2 percent faster wage growth uh in years uh unemployment 6.7 percent is lower than the peak

00:09:07.080 when i the level when i i came into uh came into office a year ago there's no question though

00:09:13.960 because it goes it's lower than the peak that's not an accomplishment this is like every time

00:09:21.240 people look at crime data and they say well we're not at the worst level so we're not we're not like

00:09:25.880 the 1990s levels of crime calm down it's gonna be okay okay i don't care about measuring our current

00:09:34.520 crime rate to the worst i don't care about measuring our current unemployment rate compared

00:09:39.960 to the worst and it's like saying oh you know it's down from the peak yes because the peak was during

00:09:45.800 the the the trade crisis where people thought we were going to have everything tariffed and

00:09:49.480 every single trade deal is going to be ripped up that was like 7.2 percent or so and we're down to

00:09:54.760 to 6.3%, 6.7%. 6.7% is horrific. Does this need to be said? That is horrific.

00:10:03.460 It was to the first part of your question. I'll move to that, which is that given the scale of

00:10:08.660 the trade actions, the uncertainty that is associated as well as with the trade actions

00:10:13.280 by the United States, that that is causing, you know, big adjustments in the Canadian economy.

00:10:20.460 And that's why we're making major investments across a whole range of areas.

00:10:24.820 I won't go through them all.

00:10:26.240 I think you're probably familiar with them.

00:10:28.220 Yes, we are.

00:10:29.220 They're not investments.

00:10:30.800 They are subsidies.

00:10:33.280 Subsidies.

00:10:33.980 We're not actually growing the economy.

00:10:36.480 We are paying companies to not get rid of their, not like not fire people.

00:10:41.340 We are bribing companies to keep people employed.

00:10:44.980 That is something that some people out there would describe as embarrassing.

00:10:48.280 this is where the poly of conservatives and i will i will go i will become homicidal if they do not do

00:10:54.600 this just kidding sort of they need to cut taxes 20 across the board 15 one of those two numbers

00:11:03.400 somewhere in between 18 run on cutting taxes across the board massively because the carny

00:11:09.420 liberals are failing saying let's stop having the government invest or subsize let's have the

00:11:14.560 government get out of the way so we can grow the economy and you can't just simply say that and say

00:11:18.060 we're going to deregulate a little bit. Deregulation is also sorely needed, but we also

00:11:23.940 need a big tax cut. It's been a while since taxes were cut a lot. We need 18% across the board,

00:11:31.400 all personal income tax brackets, corporate taxes, and just for good measure, whack a point

00:11:36.560 off the GST. If you do that, you will cause the next election to be a referendum on your plan to

00:11:43.700 give people back their money and Carney puttering along doing the same thing that Trudeau was doing

00:11:47.760 for a decade that is what the poly of conservatives need to do because this guy is eminently beatable 0.72

00:11:53.080 you can't make him as hated as trudeau he's too boring to be hated he is the eeyore of canadian

00:11:58.880 politics in in certain sense he's inherently likable because he is eeyore no one hates eeyore

00:12:05.600 as a character as he is a you know winnie the pooh character is it's almost like he's a comfort

00:12:10.680 character carney is too boring he was around the 2008 economic crisis 0809 so certain certain

00:12:18.760 generation of canadians has this strange affinity for him i know a lot of people even if you're in

00:12:23.380 that age demographic above 60 you probably still don't like them anyways if you're watching my 0.99

00:12:28.680 channel but like you can't make him hated so as a conservative party you just need to offer

00:12:34.580 something substantially better than him and have canadians come to the conclusion that carney's

00:12:38.920 got nothing. Because he's got nothing. Quite literally, he has no plans. Before we get into

00:12:44.160 some other stuff regarding Carney getting mad at people for asking basic questions, I just want to

00:12:49.780 get into this video that the Conservative Party put up, because this is open season for Pauliev.

00:12:55.720 But I do want to see this followed up on. Don't just point out the negative. Follow up with the

00:13:01.180 positive. He's lost 84,000 jobs. I'm going to massively cut taxes so we can gain those jobs

00:13:07.100 back because we can't subsidize those jobs back into existence so poly of here says we he promised

00:13:13.820 growth instead we lost 84 000 jobs in one month and nearly all in the private sector it's all an

00:13:20.540 illusion and then this video was attached being our own best customer will put more of every public

00:13:27.260 dollar back into our economy creating good canadian jobs canadian careers using canadian

00:13:33.740 resources and benefiting Canadian communities. A lot of job losses to report from the month of

00:13:39.400 February. Yeah, not good reading at all. Really bad reading, actually. The employment in this

00:13:44.460 country saw some significant declines, and this is on top of declines that we saw in January as

00:13:50.480 well, which were considered more of an edging down. These are pretty bad. Let's show you some

00:13:54.820 of the numbers right now. Employment declining by 0.4% in February. That accounts for 84,000 jobs

00:14:00.920 lost these are mainly full-time positions in the private sector which makes these numbers worse

00:14:06.000 yeah so great video for the conservatives but we do need that follow-up you have everything should

00:14:12.440 always be a one-two punch showing where the liberals are failing and then following up with

00:14:16.240 a transformatively different agenda it can't just be better it's got to be transformatively

00:14:22.220 different if someone is running if a liberal liberals don't need to run on a tax cut to get

00:14:28.160 votes because they have a very different voter profile that they're going after. They want

00:14:32.180 people who want services. They want people who are voting for, they want subsidies because they

00:14:36.980 might be in those different subsidy economies, supply chain, you know, sorry, the supply management

00:14:42.200 system, all that stuff. They want pensions, all that. It's a disproportionately older party overall

00:14:48.940 compared to the conservatives. Conservatives are very much the middle-aged party. The NDP are like

00:14:53.200 the young party. The conservatives need to run on a tax cut because you're not going to beat the

00:14:58.580 liberals in an election when Carney says, I'm going to give you $300 back on your taxes. You

00:15:02.700 can't just be saying, I'll give you $500. Who cares about the small time bidding war? He's

00:15:07.980 going to say $300. You got to say $4,000. You got to say, I'm going to cut every single bracket.

00:15:12.280 And if you're making $150,000 a year in your household, you're getting $3,000, $4,000 back

00:15:17.800 on your taxes that's what people want to hear but now i want to move on to this exchange that paul

00:15:24.680 that sorry uh mark carney had with a reporter at one of his events in norway here when you have a

00:15:32.360 tight market what you need in a tight market the last thing you need in a tight market is to have

00:15:38.520 more problems uh and canada's part of solution in that regard it's your one year anniversary you

00:15:44.040 promise to you you promised major projects you promised to remove tariffs of the u.s and levied

00:15:49.560 i did not promise i promised the best deal for canada that's the difference judy no no no no

00:15:55.320 he promised he was going to get the tariffs off he promised a deal the whole idea frankly can we

00:16:01.720 also define a good deal for canada as being one that's done quickly i'm sorry i'm not going to

00:16:06.120 wait 50 years for him to get his utopian agreement you should be getting it fast but he's trying to

00:16:11.880 to now rewrite history and say, well, I never promised to actually get a deal. I just promised

00:16:14.940 to get the best deal for Canada, which is obviously a moving goalpost. He's effectively

00:16:19.560 saying, I lied to you. He's lying on two different fronts in the sense that he in fact did promise

00:16:25.200 to get a deal signed. Now he's moving the goalpost to say that, no, I promised to get the best deal

00:16:30.440 for Canada, which means I'm not obligated to sign an agreement right away. But that in itself is a

00:16:35.060 lie because that's saying like saying I'm not actually going to get a deal because there's

00:16:37.740 such thing as a perfect deal the u.s had levy done i did not promise i promised the best deal for

00:16:43.100 canada that's the difference judy and we have the best uh deal for canada right now 0.70

00:16:47.260 thousand jobs were lost in february what results do you have in this first year that you can present

00:16:52.540 to canadians i think many canadians would feel that it is a disappointment uh well uh judy i'd

00:16:58.220 say the following uh first is uh he always uses our reporters names whenever he's just not liking

00:17:04.060 the questions he starts naming them we've created 85 84 000 net jobs uh since uh i became prime

00:17:12.380 minister the united states created about 6 000 jobs uh over that period of time uh secondly in

00:17:17.740 terms of he has not created 84 000 net jobs this is a lie it's basically saying that because when

00:17:25.740 trudeau was still prime minister that the job market fell off the cliff and then it started

00:17:32.140 coming back that technically compared to the trough that mark carney entered into it's 84 000

00:17:38.060 higher than the trough that doesn't matter though it does not matter that's the trough that was

00:17:44.720 naturally going to bounce back anyways basically he's like really this is the job market we're at

00:17:50.580 this we're at like here when trudeau's like still prime minister in december the tariff crisis

00:17:56.220 happens it dips down and then it pops back up when mark carney becomes the prime minister not

00:18:01.680 because of him it just naturally bounced back when people kind of adjusted to what the reality of the

00:18:05.360 tariffs was actually going to be and it wasn't going to be completely apocalyptic came back up

00:18:09.340 to here and so he technically gained jobs back because since he was in the trough he became

00:18:15.680 prime minister in the trough he got out of the trough and it came back up to the normal level

00:18:19.400 but since the normal level we have lost jobs we went from here when he took over which was always

00:18:24.860 going to bounce back we then came back to here when he became prime minister after a couple months

00:18:28.980 and now we're here we're like halfway in the trough because of him but he's congratulating

00:18:34.320 himself because we're not literally completely bankrupt or something major projects that's the

00:18:39.900 first point the second is that every month wages have grown faster than inflation in fact you saw

00:18:45.200 in the most recent month uh wage growth above four percent uh so canadians uh you know cost

00:18:51.080 of living moved up a lot and by the way wage growth has not gone up what happened is that

00:18:57.480 because we actually have reduced the population a little bit, that's something I'll give him.

00:19:01.680 That's actually been positive change that we've been making sure we have less TFWs, less foreign 1.00

00:19:06.740 students, less new permanent residents. And we've had more people leave the country that it actually

00:19:11.600 has popped up the per capita income like a little bit. It's not because anyone actually has been

00:19:17.380 given a pay increase. It's just because we got rid of a bunch of low minimum wage workers and

00:19:21.960 then sent them home and so relatively the average worker is now making more money because we got

00:19:27.980 rid of the bottom side of the economy. Canadians are getting ahead it's going to take longer for

00:19:34.760 that to fully realize but every month Canadians wages are growing faster than the rate of

00:19:40.040 inflation. In terms of major projects we have shifted the whole process for major projects

00:19:48.260 We've green-lighted ContraCurra that's moving forward.

00:19:51.440 We've approved a series of natural gas projects and moving forward.

00:19:55.840 We've just approved two of the largest uranium projects in the world in the course of last month.

00:20:02.620 We approved an oil pipe or gas pipeline in British Columbia.

00:20:06.960 We are moving forward with projects such as Bay de Noor off Newfoundland.

00:20:11.820 There's a series of others.

00:20:12.940 You and I were just in the Northwest Territories announcing a series of measures, including the Mackenzie Valley Highway, which.

00:20:22.400 This is what we call flailing.

00:20:24.400 He's got nothing.

00:20:25.480 So he's flailing around and just reciting a bunch of non-promises because all these things that he's been approving, all these non-accomplishments, he didn't do anything because all these projects were already pretty much all approved.

00:20:38.220 and the one that was actually scratch a brand new one happened to be tied in with brookfield which

00:20:42.960 is really sketchy you know i'm not going to make a comment about that or anything i think you can

00:20:47.320 make your own conclusions about why that's not ethical but all these projects were mostly like

00:20:51.760 at their final stage and he's fast-tracked them by like a couple weeks most of them were already

00:20:56.480 massively behind schedule so he's not actually creating any gains he's like slightly stopping

00:21:01.820 the bleeding from mr carney i just want to go back to a response you had to a question about

00:21:07.400 Canadian job losses. Earlier today, you primarily talked about macroeconomics, the major projects

00:21:12.920 office, which has yet to actually approve the project, and some more things the government

00:21:16.900 has announced that are going to be more medium to long-term projects. But what's your message

00:21:21.700 to the 84,000 additional Canadians who are looking for work right now, who are worried

00:21:26.220 about their bills today? Well, the first thing is that any job loss, of course, is a challenge

00:21:33.960 for the individuals for their families um and what's important is that we're putting in place

00:21:38.920 uh not just the measures for the long term by the way i would don't have time to go through

00:21:43.560 all the elements of the premise that uh aren't exactly uh accurate what premise but people

00:21:49.320 haven't been losing their jobs that net job losses aren't like that net job losses aren't

00:21:53.400 terrible in january february the job gains we were celebrating back in the holiday season were

00:21:59.500 obviously fake and they were temporary like oh there's a there's a problem with the premise of

00:22:04.900 the question as in he's not gonna he's not gonna use your propaganda you've net created 83 000

00:22:10.640 jobs since you became prime minister shut up oh my goodness uh there in terms of approvals and

00:22:16.060 moving forward uh but also that we're providing uh support in moving the economy for it here's

00:22:21.660 where the subsidies that's what he means he means he has subsidies that he is putting into the 0.61

00:22:27.020 economy and we're supposed to give them a pat on the butt for it. The economy is today. Well,

00:22:31.380 we've lost jobs. We've also created jobs. Well, we have taken steps immediately to help Canadians.

00:22:38.340 We've lost jobs, but we've also created jobs. That is like saying that is technically true.

00:22:43.180 If you lost 83,900 jobs, but you also created one job, that is technically true that we've

00:22:49.120 created jobs or at least two jobs to make a plural. In terms of the tax cut for 22 million

00:22:55.060 canadians that is starting to take effect now the income like 250 bucks for the average person

00:23:00.900 if you're like a combined income family i guess it's like 400 gained overall who's who's dancing

00:23:07.660 through the streets because you got 400 bucks back tax cut there uh providing uh groceries and

00:23:13.760 essentials benefit to canadians so the canadians uh most affected that's uh a benefit uh that

00:23:20.400 reaches millions of Canadians, including up to about $1,400 over the course of a year for a family

00:23:26.780 of four. There's other measures that are coming that would provide immediate support. And the

00:23:32.760 government is very focused on growing this economy and part of how we're going to grow this economy.

00:23:38.040 Yes, it's immediate measures, as I've just indicated, but it's also getting the confidence

00:23:43.240 and the investment in the country, a country that's more independent, that's diversifying our

00:23:49.800 partnerships that's building first and foremost at home oh my goodness he's just going back into

00:23:54.680 campaign rhetoric i think that there is a falling off the cliff moment coming for mark carney not

00:24:01.720 like he's going to go down he's now going to be down on the conservatives by like 10 points

00:24:05.080 but there is a time when it just becomes he had a big artificial boost because of trump in january

00:24:10.220 and february i think past that he's going to be having a tough time being able to keep people

00:24:16.000 engaged if the job numbers keep being bad eventually economic realities catch up with him

00:24:21.940 or are going to catch up with him and it's going to be very difficult for liberals to be snooty

00:24:26.520 about the fact that you know well do you what you do you like donald trump you're not voting 0.76

00:24:30.140 liberal what do you like donald trump the economy sucks so what are you going to do with that like 0.83

00:24:34.540 if you have liberal friends don't be rude don't be like snarky about it but just ask so what metric 0.94

00:24:41.380 are you actually evaluating this guy on because i have no clue what he's actually accomplished

00:24:46.060 I didn't even give him the immigration lowering.

00:24:49.080 That's good overall.

00:24:50.200 I think it still needs to be lowered much more.

00:24:51.920 We should probably get all these IRGC terrorists out of the country 1.00

00:24:54.340 that the liberals are barely taking seriously.

00:24:57.280 You know, what else can I give him?

00:24:59.040 I think he's done a good job of trying to improve relations with India.

00:25:02.160 That's a pretty minor foreign policy win overall. 0.98

00:25:04.500 The rest of his foreign policy sucks. 0.98

00:25:07.380 Like what win? 0.99

00:25:08.780 Will we fast track some projects?

00:25:10.380 Which ones did he actually fast track

00:25:12.200 and which ones were basically like five minutes to being done

00:25:14.640 and he and he moved it up to being three minutes away from being done

00:25:17.860 get off my back man but yeah anyways that should be it for this video guys thank you for showing

00:25:25.860 up patronizing me and watching this video make sure to like the video subscribe leave a comment

00:25:31.680 consider hitting the join button and helping sustain this channel along with me and i will

00:25:36.940 see you guys all next time

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - March 14, 2026

Carney's Credibility Crumbles after 84,000 more jobs lost!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript