00:09:00.940somebody who might actually want to run in a more winnable riding next time but they're kind of
00:09:05.780putting their personality on display in this riding and showing that they can throw punches
00:09:09.920at the liberals even if they are dead on arrival because when you do that you actually might be
00:09:14.300able to make the riding a bit more competitive in that by-election not winning it probably still
00:09:18.360losing by 20 points but it will look better but overall though the liberals won these ridings
00:09:23.780with crazy vote margins because of course they were going to win now in Surrey Cloverdale last
00:09:29.260election, you had Tamara Jensen beating a Liberal for the riding in a by-election.
00:09:38.040That was previously a Liberal had held the riding, John Aldeg. He dropped out to run for the BCNDP
00:09:44.320in the provincial election. He actually got beat in that provincial election by Harmon Bangu for
00:09:48.660Langley Abbotsford, so it was not a good idea for him to resign to run provincially. But when the
00:09:53.020Liberals then tried to replace John Aldeg, I'm not sure if he ran again or somebody else,
00:09:58.820Tamara Jensen, who again, remember, had lost that riding last election to John Aldegg,
00:10:05.000then retook it from the Liberals, but she won by literally 50 points.
00:10:09.420The margin between her vote and the Trudeau Liberal at the time was 50 points.
00:10:14.520You can read into that result because it's an actual seat change.
00:10:18.220You can't read into the Liberals already holding a riding with a massive margin
00:10:22.520and then winning the riding in a by-election that nobody really cares about
00:10:26.320by an even bigger margin. A lot of people only vote in places like University Rosedale in a
00:10:31.560federal election, not because they expect the conservative locally to win, but they're voting
00:10:36.280for the conservatives because they like Polyev or they like the conservative party in general,
00:10:40.780and they're getting out there in solidarity to support the conservative party. But anyways,
00:10:45.960let's get back to this clip. I just find this, the implication here is the idea that, hmm,
00:10:51.840you're sitting there as a conservative and you don't have a cabinet position because the
00:10:55.500conservatives don't have uh control of the government oh well you should think about you
00:10:59.860know you know maybe cross the floor or getting rid of pure polyev or something like this when
00:11:04.520there's not enough evidence to come to any of these conclusions uh so there it is this like
00:11:08.960okay it's a liberal majority government that's terrible but well actually wait a second we get
00:11:13.100to breathe a little bit and actually figure out what is the what is the path forward here and to
00:11:17.720the point i said before and i'll say again time is the only thing right now strongly on polyev's
00:11:23.380He has to figure it out. He has to use the timer appropriately and see where this goes. You know, there's lots of chatter last week of more MPs crossing. I've seen lots of chatter about letters, the Reform Act, where you can remove a leader about people collecting signatures.
00:11:41.000I've not actually heard from any MPs or any Conservatives that that's actually happening.
00:11:46.580It is something when a party gets a majority government, there's got to be some reflection here.
00:11:51.600There's got to be some, you know, caucuses Wednesday.
00:11:53.760It'll be interesting what is discussed at that point.
00:11:56.540But, you know, we are, what, how many weeks are left in this session of the House?
00:12:00.500Seven, eight, and then we have the summer break.
00:12:03.480Now, remember, Fred DeLore here is, in fact, the Conservative on the CBC panel.
00:12:08.340And of course, someone on the CBC panel, it doesn't really matter if it's a conservative or not, because they're all the liberal on the CBC panel, just kind of throwing out that maybe there could be something to do with the Reform Act, which would allow the Conservative Party MPs to just throw Polyev out.
00:12:24.160Like, why is this on the table to discuss? Now, I have criticisms of Polyev. I have praises of Polyev. I think that he's done a really good job on certain things in the past that I think that he's actually kind of fallen down on a little bit these days. And he could regain some of his strength on issues if he makes, you know, changes with the suggestions that I would I would give or other people would give.
00:12:44.060But what has he really done that lost all these MPs, that caused Carney to be able to secure a majority government using petty office seekers like Chris Dontremont, CCP agents like Michael Ma, anti-pipeline land back people like Laurie Idlout, Matt Jenneru, who's been lying about what riding he lives in so he can be the Edmonton Riverbend MP, even though he lives where I am right now in Victoria.
00:13:11.000we have Marilyn Gladju who needs to be the corpse at every funeral and bride at every wedding who
00:13:15.960probably crossed the floor just for attention seeking reasons tell me how this has anything
00:13:20.160to do with Polyev people keep saying well isn't there any internal reflections going on how about
00:13:25.280one of the floor crossers comes out and explains why Polyev is bad and why he forced them to leave
00:13:32.280they don't explain it because probably it's not true probably it's the petty reasons is the why
00:13:39.340they left and if they actually told people what happened they would look really bad in the midst
00:13:43.880of the story i get through that i think polyev is going to have to really map something out and come
00:13:49.380back in the fall and i said the same thing last summer we had to map something out last summer
00:13:53.520there is it he's got to do something he's got to show something and keep people comfortable that he
00:13:59.360does have a plan yeah i i get what is this commentary polyev needs to go away and do
00:14:05.100something, or say something, or prove something. What something? And I can even say the something
00:14:10.420that Polyev should do, because I've been saying it for a while. The Conservative Party needs a
00:14:15.220harder, older platform, a big tax cut across the board. Because what Mark Carney just did today
00:14:23.020was smart. He took Polyev's suggestion to remove the gas taxes, and he removed part of them. Now,
00:14:29.280Polyev's plan would remove it by 25, would reduce current gas prices by 25 cents a liter
00:14:34.560on average. And what Carney is doing is going to reduce it by 10. Now, Carney is going to get the
00:14:40.540credit for reducing it. So it was a good suggestion by Polyev and Carney's trying to make it its own
00:14:44.740thing. But the problem is, is that right now Polyev is sometimes offering or suggesting that
00:14:50.500the liberals do only small things. Now, there's no coincidence that Carney did it after he secured
00:14:55.560his majority because he didn't want to acknowledge that Polyev had a good idea before he got the
00:14:59.440majority government. But whatever, he's now done it. But what are you going to do now as Pierre
00:15:04.160Polyev? You can't just say, oh, well, they should cut the gas taxes even more, because now we're
00:15:09.440playing Price is Right, and you never want to do Price is Right politics. You want to say, hey,
00:15:13.620let's reduce taxes, income taxes, corporate taxes, and the GST across the board by a large percentage.
00:15:19.600Take a point off the GST, reduce all other taxes across the board by 20%.
00:15:27.360Carney will never try and do that, because he's a liberal.
00:15:30.720The problem with asking him to do something more attainable, like reduce the gas tax,
00:15:35.160is that he might do it, and then you end up sitting there running on an agenda item that
00:15:40.500wasn't really that remarkable in the first place, and he's just stolen it from you.
00:15:44.880That was the problem with running against the carbon tax only in 2025.
00:15:49.600Well, Carney just adjusted it down and took away your platform from you, because Carney is smart at political maneuvering. Now, he's not very good at political rhetoric. Now, he can be very incompetent when it comes to policy. He hasn't done anything particularly good yet. Literally, the only two things that he did well was just taking Polyev's idea to get rid of the consumer carbon tax and reduce the gas taxes, although he's found ways of increasing taxes in other ways.
00:16:14.860he's done a little bit of some progress on immigration but it's still way too high
00:16:19.260other than that he's been pretty bad the problem though is that if you're the conservatives and
00:16:23.900you're not running on a big enough agenda a big or bold enough platform it doesn't motivate people
00:16:29.180to show up when at best you sound like you're maybe proposing a 20 percent improvement on how
00:16:34.540things are currently done you should basically only ever be running to improve things 100 percent
00:16:40.140200%. Everything should be getting just massively better if you become prime minister. And I think
00:16:45.820the conservative party has been too obsessed with not rocking the boat too much and simply
00:16:51.080tinkering around the edges of policy. I think Polioff is a political talent. And I think the
00:16:56.620people who advise him tend to advise timidity, mildness, and that doesn't really jibe with
00:17:03.480here Polioff's personality. He's a big personality and should be running on big things. But at times,
00:17:08.940I think that his own staff end up basically telling him to run like he's Aaron O'Toole or
00:17:13.440run like he's Andrew Scheer. Now, if Polly became prime minister, I think he would improve things
00:17:17.880massively. But the way he talks indicates the person who doesn't follow politics that much,
00:17:21.960that it's not going to be that much different than what Mark Carney would be doing. But I'll
00:17:26.560finish this up and then we'll get to some other stuff. I agree with you that time is on his side.
00:17:31.080I just don't know how many times you can ask for time to come up with a plan. Do you know what I
00:17:35.860mean i don't know and i agree i don't i don't have a list of people we talked about before though
00:17:40.780about this being a wartime prime minister right like we people are really focused in on the
00:17:44.560certain issues and the prime minister has to deliver with this with what he's given if he
00:17:48.360has a majority he's got to deliver stuff so like you know 15 months ago pierre polyev had a 25 point
00:17:53.260lead since then he's lost a national election he's lost his own seat and mark herney i hate this
00:17:57.860talking point okay when we had rosemary barton there again just throwing darts at polyev implying
00:18:02.760that you know how how long with no to plan until you know you know something happened and then you
00:18:08.100have david cochran who then comes in here i had to reverse this a little bit just so i could hear
00:18:12.780that again i i just i find all this snideness from the media infuriating now criticize polyev
00:18:20.500do that sure come up with actual concrete criticisms i can the conservative party needs
00:18:27.120real nominations they need to run on a boulder platform across all the issues social fiscal
00:18:32.280uh cultural but the thing is the media doesn't agree with my analysis that they need to be more
00:18:38.200conservative they need bolder plans to get people out so they just stick to this vague thing that
00:18:42.480he somehow just vaguely done something wrong and they can't really name it because you know they
00:18:48.900can't actually they don't have any good criticisms for him they're just simply wanting to throw vague
00:18:52.820darts since then he's lost the national election he's lost his own seat and mark hardy is going to
00:18:57.200get a majority largely on the strength of defections from pure poly of scott now again it's
00:19:01.820it's the constant just implication that it's polyos false for losing mp candidates not them
00:19:08.980betraying their own constituents the media never digs down that rabbit hole about how much of a
00:19:14.780betrayal this is to the voters of these areas and then he says he lost a 25 lead the lead was never
00:19:20.44025 guys i hate this revisionist history the lead that the conservatives had in 2024 and
00:19:27.040December was never 25%. It was maybe 15. It was 13. At highest, it was 18. The thing is that the
00:19:35.400media likes to cite the highest lead the conservatives ever had to make it look like,
00:19:39.400oh, and Paulie, I felt all the way down here. Do you actually know the pollster that said 25%
00:19:43.260for the conservatives? It was ECOS. Now, you might be sitting there thinking, well, that's weird.
00:19:48.500Isn't ECOS the pollster that always says the liberals are leading by like 20 points these
00:19:52.940days or 15 points or 17 points when Carney first became prime minister. And that clearly wasn't
00:19:57.840true based on what happened on election day. Yes, but it's a propaganda pollster. So when
00:20:03.580that propaganda pollster needed to give the liberal party more ammunition to get rid of
00:20:08.900Justin Trudeau, well, suddenly ECOS, which had been showing milder leads for the conservative
00:20:14.180party than the other pollsters up to that point, suddenly shoots up and says, oh, oh,
00:20:18.020Polly of the conservatives are 25 percent ahead. But I hate how this gets rolled into this
00:20:22.280narrative, that Pauliev blew this just incredibly large lead. The lead wasn't that big. What
00:20:29.500happened was that conservatives were excited to vote because, hey, let's get rid of Trudeau,
00:20:35.340and the liberals were like, oh my goodness, we have to run with Trudeau as our leader? So they
00:20:39.160weren't answering the polls as much. I apply the same logic now. The liberal leads are exaggerated
00:20:44.080now because, of course, conservatives are not in government, and they don't have all the exciting
00:20:49.160things happening for them with floor crossers and whatnot. So they're less likely to pick up
00:20:53.340the phone and answer a poll or answer an online poll. But the liberals are. So their lead is
00:20:57.920currently exaggerated the way that the conservative lead became exaggerated in December 24.
00:21:03.400Liberals, as abacus data says right now, probably leading five to eight points. It's between that
00:21:09.360range right now. That's the realistic lead for the liberals. That would be a majority.
00:21:13.060Back in 24, now everyone hated Trudeau's guts. And so I believe that the conservatives weren't
00:21:18.700double digits but they weren't 25 but again they repeat this because it makes poly of look worse
00:21:25.020if you cite this unrealistically high number and show how far he has fallen
00:21:29.460right like that is a track record i know he sent letters to a shadow cabinet saying justify your
00:21:36.100role and this may be a reason marilyn gladu crossed the floor i think you were confirming
00:21:39.600that on friday on the show uh that doesn't even make sense she wasn't she wasn't a cabinet minister
00:21:44.140She wasn't a shadow cabinet minister, I believe.
00:21:48.540So saying that you have to justify your role would cause Marilyn Gladju to relieve is insane
00:21:53.640because she didn't have a big role at that point.
00:21:56.140If anything, she would have been someone who should, in theory, be excited that other people1.00
00:22:00.080are going to have to justify their roles because maybe she can move up to the front bench1.00
00:22:04.000and be able to get a big shadow cabinet job.1.00
00:22:07.460Fred, but a year and a half ago, we were talking about he needs a finance minister.
00:22:13.080he needs this now it's he needs time yeah okay yeah apparently again the media is trying to turn
00:22:19.480this into a funeral for a pure polyev uh again i need to i need to highlight this i find all these
00:22:25.240clips just obnoxious of how the media will turn again the corruption of democracy doesn't mean
00:22:31.160your votes don't actually count the vast majority of people have the mp that they voted for but it
00:22:35.320is something that undermines the way our system is supposed to work when people just kind of take
00:22:40.760their voters votes as a mere suggestion and not actually like a promise that i'm promising you
00:22:47.640that i'm going to represent your views in government if you got into government i would
00:22:51.620say even as a liberal if you were part of the government right now and you're you are a liberal
00:22:56.220mp and your views kind of changed to being more conservative i would say you actually still have
00:23:00.500a duty to vote for the liberal government unless you're crossing the floor because of a massive
00:23:05.280corruption scandal and you can't be part of this anymore you have a duty to vote for the things
00:23:09.720that you were elected to do you can't just be like oh i had a road to toronto moment so i'm
00:23:15.260leaving and joining the liberals oh i i'm joining the conservatives like leon alice love did back
00:23:20.360in like 2018 oh i don't like him anymore i'm leaving i didn't get a good enough gig i'm leaving
00:23:25.080and joining the conservatives no you weren't elected to do that but we're not going to actually
00:23:29.180investigate that very big issue that's plaguing our politics right now we're just going to simply
00:23:34.640throw darts at polio what's your number one job when you're a political leader to win when you
00:23:39.520don't win your job is inherently and constantly at risk and when you lost an election you're
00:23:44.800supposed to win lost your own riding now you're losing four caucus members to the sitting
00:23:49.920government and in the in the process losing majority control the house of commons none of
00:23:54.800that is good for you he does have that large endorsement of the party members at his party
00:23:59.680convention just a few short months ago um so he's got that to stand by but he has to stop the
00:24:06.280bleeding and he has to give conservatives and then canadians in that order reason to believe
00:24:12.160that he's the right guy that he can win and that the losing is behind him now the thing is that
00:24:19.500actually it was bad when obviously polyab didn't win the 25 election and lost his own riding
00:24:24.700now i would say that the thing the conservative party needs to do is fire everyone associated
00:24:29.620with that. I know there are individuals who were in charge of overseeing Polyev's rioting who are
00:24:35.300still around in the offices. People who knew about this stuff, who stood by when nominations were not
00:24:42.060being done properly. You have Jenny Byrne and Jeremy Litkey still around. Why? I have no clue.
00:24:48.240You have other people who were just awful organizers in the different provinces who still
00:24:51.680have jobs. That needs to be fixed. Those are actual, I'm coming up with real substantive
00:24:56.720issues that can be fixed. People associated with the failure should go. But we're going to try and
00:25:00.980just put it all at Pierre Polyev's feet and act like everyone who's crossing the floor is again
00:25:05.900saying something about himself. All the other things like these by-elections are another loss
00:25:12.240for Polyev. They're a loss for Polyev. They're safe. Two of them are safe liberal seats and the
00:25:16.920other one is a battleground between the bloc and the liberals. This doesn't say anything about
00:25:20.860anything. I'm sorry. I know the media wants to read into it. There's just nothing to read into
00:25:25.580it. I'm sorry. Like, I'm sorry that they don't have a reason to attack Polyev. But I just want
00:25:30.540to jump to this. Now, I will actually give, again, Carney is playing good politics now
00:25:34.940with the gas tax thing. He's trying to take another tool, another club away from Polyev by at least
00:25:40.560not even half doing the idea, like a third doing the idea. A little bit more than 30%
00:25:45.460of the tax reduction that Polyev was proposing is being implemented by Carney. Now, there,
00:25:51.420this is a great way of getting a little small victory on the board for them, reducing gas taxes
00:25:55.640by a bit, although they should just remove all of them because gas taxes are just like massive,
00:26:00.600gas is massively inflated right now because they were in Iran. But they're doing a little bit of a
00:26:04.920thing to take this issue away from Polyev. Now Polyev needs to understand now, needs to pivot
00:26:10.400to a big across the board income tax cut. I wouldn't declare it this week because it would
00:26:15.920look like the last shriek on the retreat. I would do it in the coming months or the summer,
00:26:20.680roll out like we are at 1BC. We have the 25% plan at 1BC, 25% reductions in income taxes,
00:26:29.540corporate taxes, take two points off the PST, reduce administrators by 25%, reduce the number
00:26:35.260of ministries by 25%, like Javier Mele, reduce regulations by 25%, a simple but bold plan to do
00:26:42.480economic reform. And then do the same thing when it comes to cultural and social issues. Take a
00:26:47.760big stance that's simple but everyone knows that it would be a massive change a first year a first
00:26:54.220time offense for fentanyl dealing that's a 10-year sentence or five-year sentence have a massive
00:26:58.780punishment for drug dealers you'll actually start to win especially asian communities way more
00:27:03.720because those people their number one issue tends to be drugs run on a soft pro-life platform because
00:27:09.720as my friend chris the great canadian bagel pointed out when i was on his channel we did a
00:27:15.320video together about BC polling, he pointed out the problem when you don't run pro-life is all
00:27:20.580the pro-life voters don't really have a reason to vote for you anymore. And their second top issue
00:27:25.060might be one that they actually lean to the liberals on. So if you take away their top issue
00:27:29.220being pro-life from them, they're no longer voting for that because none of the parties are running
00:27:33.200pro-life. So, well, now maybe their next big issue is their pension and they trust the liberals more
00:27:39.360of beefing up their pension benefits. That's the problem when you don't run conservative.
00:27:44.260of. You're not running on the thing that people want enough, and so they drop down to their second
00:27:49.260or their third biggest issue, and those might be issues that the liberals win them over on.
00:27:54.480Voters are weird. Voters don't just say, I'm a conservative conservative who believes conservative
00:27:58.780things on everything. People have views that would fall into the different parties' baskets.
00:28:03.920If you believe in healthcare, you might be voting for the NDP because they are the healthcare party
00:28:09.040that just talks about jamming more money into the healthcare system regardless of it's being used
00:28:13.340right. That's if you care about health care, you will be voting NDP, even if every issue after that
00:28:19.180in terms of your hierarchy of values might be conservative, technically, technically, you want
00:28:23.800lower taxes. But you also like health care. So you vote NDP because they're the health care party.
00:28:28.720Now, I know this video is a little bit disorganized, but I'm just trying to put a lot of
00:28:32.880thoughts out there for people to kind of chew on in the aftermath of this. I don't think these
00:28:37.380by-elections say much about Polyev. But if they if but if people are saying they somehow say
00:28:42.520I will reject that, but say that overall there's still improvements that could be made. It has
00:28:48.440nothing to do with these three by-elections, but these have been things hanging in the background
00:28:52.880that I've been saying a lot over time that should be fixed anyways. It's not because all the floor
00:28:58.140crossers are his fault. I don't think any of them are his fault. It doesn't mean the by-elections
00:29:01.840are his fault. It doesn't mean a lot of the other things are his fault. But we can do two things at
00:29:07.540ones. The media is entirely wrong. And there are still improvements that can be made inside the
00:29:12.860conservative camp. But here is Carney now taking away the gas tax issue. We all know that because
00:29:18.460of the war with Iran, fuel prices have increased sharply around the world, including right here
00:29:24.260in Canada. So we're taking more action to help build that bridge over short-term pressure.
00:29:31.740With the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Natural Resources, we're announcing today
00:29:35.660that Canada's new government will temporarily suspend the federal fuel excise tax from next
00:29:42.640Monday until Labor Day. We're also removing the fuel excise tax on aviation fuels. This will
00:29:51.060remove up to 10 cents per litre on gasoline and 4 cents per litre on diesel fuel. And again,
00:29:58.260this is a weaker promise than what Kapaliev was pushing for. This is a weaker thing for him to
00:30:02.720be doing but the problem is the conservatives should not get wrapped up in trying to say this
00:30:06.980isn't enough because most Canadians will just say well he did give me something so I'm not unhappy
00:30:11.340with him and people aren't going to get angry thinking that not that many people are going to
00:30:15.460get angry thinking they got 10 cents off their gas or they could have gotten 25 most people who
00:30:19.700don't follow politics that much are just going to say think I got 10 cents off my gas but this is
00:30:24.920again why you should be running on things that you know your opponent will not do if you propose it
00:30:29.240a massive across the board tax cut is what the Conservatives should do. I actually want the
00:30:34.820finance minister sitting there, Francois Philippe Champagne. I think that Polyev needs to make one
00:30:40.300of his next initiatives needs to be going after him for his conflict of interest in the Alto
00:30:46.460train situation. They should also do what we've been doing at 1BC and calling out Liberal MP for
00:30:51.800Vancouver Quadra, Wade Grant, for his massive conflict of interest as a former board member
00:30:57.680of the council member of the Musqueam band, and also an advisor on indigenous affairs to Chrissy
00:31:04.280Clark, and also a liberal MP, of course, that he didn't say anything to his constituents about the
00:31:08.840Musqueam agreement that the liberals signed that have undermined the land title of both public and
00:31:14.640private property in the area. Yes, you're not going to have your house repossessed, but now you are
00:31:19.160sharing title, which is insane. Conservatives need to go after him, Francois-Philippe Champagne,
00:31:24.380They need to go after corruption across the board, and Polyev needs to re-embrace his blacked-out roots.
00:31:30.440If you remember that video where Polyev went out during the WE charity scandal and threw out all the papers that the liberals had blacked out because they didn't want people to see all of the obvious conflict of interest between the Trudeau family and the WE charity that the government was giving a billion dollars plus to.
00:31:50.500I think it was actually more than that. It was at least hundreds of millions, if not a billion
00:31:54.160dollars going to this charity for children's education that the Trudeaus were getting speaking
00:31:59.640fees for. Polioff needs to do stuff like this again. Be theatrical. Politics is not backroom
00:32:06.940drama. So many people in politics like to think of themselves as like, you know, what is they like
00:32:13.960to think of themselves as a character in House of Cards or West Wing or even Veep. Politics isn't
00:32:19.320veep west winger house of cards politics is opera at the end of the day and i know not a lot of
00:32:23.880people watch opera but politics is big and epic and people want to vote for a hero who's going
00:32:29.780to ascend the tower and kick the black knight off the top and i think that paul ev had that
00:32:34.860but his advisors have kind of been telling him more so to kind of cultivate professionalism
00:32:42.300cultivate seriousness in terms of how he carries himself and talks he would never do something like
00:32:48.260this now, not because he wouldn't want to. I think he would love to do stuff like this.
00:32:51.880And I think too much in the communications department has been around looking prime
00:32:55.740ministerial. Be prime ministerial, look prime ministerial when you're the prime minister.
00:33:00.640When you're not prime minister, go after the liberals like this, circa just five years ago
00:33:04.600or so. We have here an email from Craig Kielberger to Bill Morneau. And, you know, we'd love to learn
00:33:13.280about the attached documents in it but unfortunately and what is to become a trend throughout this
00:33:18.620package it's all all the relevant information the two documents are completely blacked out
00:33:25.440another email from craig keelberger that went to someone in the government the same day he spoke
00:33:31.840to bill morneau on the phone but we don't know who received the email that's blacked out or what the
00:33:37.860email said all blacked out here's an email from the minister responsible for the department that
00:33:44.620granted the half billion dollars to her top bureaucrat again all the substance is backed
00:33:51.180out blacked out and that would not be the first time next page blacked out this page blacked out
00:33:59.440this page blacked out this page blacked out why don't we ask what's in those pages at a
00:34:07.800parliamentary committee well i'll tell you why justin trudeau shut down those parliamentary
00:34:14.560committees when did he do it the same day these documents became public do you know that right
00:34:21.080now we have basically the same caliber of corruption issue going on right now with
00:34:25.940Francois-Philippe Champagne, the Minister of Finance, and his wife, who is the Vice President
00:34:30.340of Environment at Alto Trains, which is a crown company, they got a $90 billion,
00:34:37.780they're getting $90 billion to build a train from Toronto to Quebec City that's only going
00:34:44.320to have five stops, and they've already estimated that the cost could overrun all the way to $200
00:34:48.760billion. And guess what? There was a committee meeting trying to get him to answer questions
00:34:54.960about his conflict of interest, and the Liberals did move heaven and earth to make sure that
00:35:00.760Francois-Philippe Champagne didn't have to actually testify. And the way that they got
00:35:05.200away with it was they basically just ran out the clock, waited until the by-elections happened last
00:35:10.260night, so they have a majority and they no longer actually have to force Francois-Philippe Champagne
00:35:15.460to be summoned. That is something the Liberals actually did. Polyev could easily do this whole
00:35:21.240routine again. Let's go through all the records of what he claimed that he had recused himself
00:35:25.340when he had declared his conflict of interest. He could go through every single update of the
00:35:32.380conflict of interest screenings that you can get and show for months, weeks and weeks and weeks
00:35:38.300during the time that he said that he disclosed his conflict of interest, he had not done it.
00:35:42.920this this is opera this is exciting this is heroic it's about good and evil corrupt and just and i
00:35:54.140think this is what the conservatives need to go to not saying they're doing this a little bit wrong
00:35:58.840or they're doing that wrong that this is evil or this is corruption or this is incompetence it
00:36:06.000needs to be very everything needs to be hard-hitting and they need to follow up with the
00:36:09.800punch of what they're going to do, and it needs to be epic in its scope of the amount of change
00:36:15.240they need. But by the way, I actually like that Polyev is wearing a red tie here and a blue shirt.
00:36:20.260I think too often these days, he wears a white shirt, dark navy suit, and a dark navy tie.
00:36:26.740Now, lo and behold, I'm kind of wearing something like that, although I have stripes. I think
00:36:31.340Polyev actually needs to kind of put a little more color into his outfits these days because
00:36:35.840the media wants to paint a picture of him being dark, demure, stiff. You got to change your outfit
00:36:43.360a little bit. I will personally take Pierre Polyev to my men's store of choice and have them get him
00:36:50.780a new outfit. I think it actually would work. It would actually be helpful. Get a softer looking
00:36:56.140haircut. Don't put too much, don't put product in your hair anymore. Let it flop around. He has great
00:37:01.120hair right here. Maybe a little bit older than his age here than it should be. Whatever. Put
00:37:07.140glasses back on. Glasses make you look a little dorky. That's sometimes a good thing in Canadian
00:37:11.500politics. But now I'm just getting silly and doing my routine again about politicians and
00:37:16.380how they look. But anyways, I'm going to be coming back and talking more about how Canadian
00:37:21.680politics is developing. I'll be covering liberal scandals. I'll be covering things in British
00:37:25.200Columbia. But a through line in a lot of my federal coverage will be basically sitting here