The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - February 04, 2025


CBC attacks Chrystia Freeland to defend Carney and Trudeau!


Episode Stats

Length

15 minutes

Words per Minute

185.78572

Word Count

2,960

Sentence Count

154

Misogynist Sentences

12

Hate Speech Sentences

1


Summary

Chrystia Freeland has been a key part of the Liberal leadership campaign for a decade, and yet, she's being attacked by Rosemary Barton for not being an "insider" enough. Is she an insider or an outsider?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. As a conservative commentator, this federal liberal leadership
00:00:07.040 race has been so weird to follow, because day to day, I am sometimes having to defend
00:00:13.060 people I would normally only say bad things about. Today, I'm going to have to defend
00:00:18.940 former Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, because as weird
00:00:24.660 as it is to say, she is in fact an outsider candidate in this liberal leadership race.
00:00:30.660 Is she on paper an insider? 100% she is. She's been an insider for a decade. At the same time,
00:00:38.580 Mark Carney is clearly the pick of both Team Trudeau, as well as the liberal establishment
00:00:44.840 of the media. This is why I'm going to show you this absolutely insane clip where Rosemary
00:00:51.020 Barton from the CBC attacks Chrystia Freeland because they are going all out trying to paint
00:00:57.380 her as the insider and Mark Carney as the outsider, even though his campaign chair is Gerald Butts.
00:01:03.140 He has Katie Telford on his campaign assisting. Justin Trudeau is clearly behind him. Justin
00:01:08.200 Trudeau's entire wedding party is either on the campaign or endorsing the man, and he
00:01:13.320 has most of the ministers endorsing him. It's wild to watch. But look at this. This demonstrates
00:01:19.980 just how in the bag the CBC is right now for Mark Carney, because Rosemary Barton is saying
00:01:27.600 things in an interview that are just frankly inappropriate if you're trying to be a neutral
00:01:32.000 interviewer. Before I get into it, guys, just a reminder to like this video, subscribe to
00:01:36.860 the channel if you're not yet a subscriber. About 70% of people who watch any of my videos
00:01:41.220 are not yet subscribers, so make sure you go hit that subscribe button, and then leave
00:01:45.200 a comment if you have any thoughts. I always like to scroll through and see what people
00:01:48.820 have said. Anyways, check this out right here. You told my colleague Catherine Cullen that you're
00:01:54.180 running against the Ottawa establishment, the establishment that you have been a key part of
00:01:58.800 for a decade. Why on earth would anyone believe the claim that you are against the establishment,
00:02:04.000 that you are not part of the establishment? That's not a real question. That is what we call
00:02:08.920 poisoning the well. And again, is Christy Freeland part of the establishment? Obviously she is.
00:02:14.700 Compared to Mark Carney, is she the establishment favorite? Not at all. It's obviously Mark Carney
00:02:21.880 when it comes to Gerald Butts and Katie Telford and everyone else who is a big power broker inside
00:02:27.780 the party. Freeland has some people on her side, but she is swimming against the tide. But that
00:02:33.520 question right there where Rosemary Barton said, why on earth would anyone consider you an outsider
00:02:39.020 or not an insider? It's like, what the heck? You're basically saying this is a completely ridiculous
00:02:44.100 thing you're trying to put forward, Christia. You're wrong, but here you have a chance to talk
00:02:49.460 anyways, and I'm probably going to cut you off. Look, I think that people can see very clearly
00:02:55.940 the dynamics of the race. But the reason that I'm asking people... That's not what my question was.
00:03:02.060 Okay, guys, I'm being very serious with you. I actually don't watch these clips ahead of time
00:03:09.340 outside of the first like 15, 16 seconds, because I want to be able to react to it fresh.
00:03:15.280 Truly, she couldn't even let Freeland get away with giving like half an answer. She immediately
00:03:21.420 jumps in and says, hey, wait, wait, wait, Christia, I'm trying to attack you right now. Why are you not
00:03:26.000 accepting me attacking you? It's like Rosemary Barton is still only used to interviewing people
00:03:31.260 like Erin O'Toole, who just lie down and wait for the interviewer to kill them. Because like,
00:03:36.920 she looks so bad here. Honestly, this is making Christia Freeland look good. Does Christia Freeland
00:03:42.220 deserve to look good? No. Half the time, she looks like a bit of a bush baby in this interview,
00:03:47.180 looking like a deer in the headlights. But Rosemary is making it so obvious that Carney is like
00:03:53.080 a artificial propped up guy to be Justin Trudeau's fourth term in office.
00:03:58.640 She said, why would people believe that you are not part of the establishment,
00:04:03.820 given the proximity you had to the prime minister for a decade? Are you actually just saying that
00:04:08.620 because that is the only possible way for you to win at this stage?
00:04:11.960 Again, that's not a question. That's an attack. This is saying you're a loser who's going to lose.
00:04:16.220 And are you just saying this because you're losing so bad? Maybe it's your only path to victory.
00:04:21.180 What?
00:04:21.360 Rosie, not at all. And I think it's important for people to remember that I resigned. I'm the minister
00:04:29.920 who had the courage to do that. I'm the minister who saw that we needed to be relentlessly focused
00:04:37.600 on the threat that Donald Trump posed.
00:04:39.820 Would you not have had a better...
00:04:40.960 Rosie, I'm not just saying that today. I said that on December 16th, before these measures were in place.
00:04:49.040 Would you not, Chrystia Freeland, have had a better opportunity to help the country
00:04:53.860 had you stayed at the cabinet table in whatever capacity the prime minister wanted you to?
00:04:58.200 It's serious. Rosemary Barton, like Justin Trudeau's enforcer here, like grilling her,
00:05:03.860 you should have stayed at the company's side.
00:05:05.880 Why would you betray Justin Trudeau like that? My fantasy boyfriend. Why would you ever do that
00:05:12.900 to Mr. Trudeau? Chrystia, why are you such an insider at the same time when you've proven me wrong?
00:05:19.260 Well, you were wrong for doing it. Shouldn't you have stayed in the insider circle?
00:05:23.080 And again, the absurdity of everything going on here is that Chrystia Freeland for years helped
00:05:27.840 feed the bodies of people under the bus like Bill Morneau and other people who were doing the right
00:05:33.160 thing in Trudeau's government. You know, Jane Philpott, Jody Wilson-Raybould, tons of other
00:05:39.340 liberals have been thrown out of the party. Ram Nishanga. Lots of people were thrown out for
00:05:44.280 calling out issues within the party, corruption, or doing their jobs properly, but Justin Trudeau
00:05:50.160 needed to use their back as a knife block. She was totally fine with it. And that's why this is so weird,
00:05:56.460 because she actually is the outsider at this point, and the CBC is not having it, because how dare you
00:06:02.140 get in the way of Justin Trudeau's fourth term using Mark Carney as a meat puppet?
00:06:06.920 You would have been able to take on Donald Trump right now.
00:06:10.460 No. Canada is strong. Canada is going to astonish the world with our strength, and I am very proud
00:06:19.120 every single day to be out there talking to Canadians, rallying Canadians, and speaking out for Canada.
00:06:27.460 You could see how, like, angry Rosemary Barton looked in, like, the corners of her mouth. It's like,
00:06:34.020 yeah, yeah, yeah, okay, okay, Christy, shut the hell up. Get off my show. Either could drop out of the
00:06:40.820 race and endorse Carney, or you're not allowed on my show again. Again, this is why nobody likes the CBC.
00:06:47.020 Is technically this just a basic interview on paper? Sure. But the questions are done horribly.
00:06:55.940 They always imply that you're wrong, and you're going to say some stuff, but you're already wrong,
00:07:00.800 because I've told the audience you're wrong. Why on earth, Christy, or would anyone believe that
00:07:06.080 you're not part of the establishment? Well, because if you have eyes and ears, you can look
00:07:13.500 at the dynamic of the race and see that Carney has all of the Team Trudeau support, and everyone else
00:07:20.180 is either a candidate who's only running for the leadership to throw Carney second-place votes,
00:07:25.600 or they are heavily on the outs with the party, like Freeland is. By the way, she is right. She
00:07:32.640 actually did trigger the ouster of Justin Trudeau as prime minister, so she should get some credit for
00:07:37.980 that. But again, Rosemary is deeply, deeply invested in making it that Carney's the outsider.
00:07:45.300 So he's never even been an MP before, but he's been Trudeau's economic advisor for years. In fact,
00:07:51.380 a few times where there was big policy screw-ups in the last few years, it wasn't Freeland's fault
00:07:57.320 exactly as finance minister. It's her fault for being around when the problems are happening and not
00:08:02.700 calling out until the very last minute. But it was Carney that was basically the one making the
00:08:07.960 playbook that the liberals ran on and that Trudeau told Freeland to implement. That's why she ended
00:08:13.800 up leaving when she got tired with Trudeau basically doing a bait-and-switch every time she was carrying
00:08:20.200 out what he wanted. He would change his mind, and then she'd look like an idiot pivoting and then
00:08:24.660 causing a massive deficit because Trudeau cannot keep what he wants straight. Is Freeland a good
00:08:30.100 politician? No. I hope she loses her re-election. She doesn't deserve to be in government.
00:08:35.220 At the same time, if I was having to choose between Mark Carney and Chrystia Freeland as
00:08:40.520 liberal leader, I would take Chrystia Freeland because at least it's honest. At least it's some
00:08:46.760 random lady running because she wants to run and she doesn't like Justin Trudeau. Mark Carney's not
00:08:52.200 even running. He's running so that Justin Trudeau doesn't have to run because Justin Trudeau doesn't
00:08:57.880 want to lose the next election, so he wants Mark Carney to be his stand-in so that maybe Justin gets to
00:09:03.700 have a comeback in eight years or something like that. Mark my words, Trudeau is going to attempt
00:09:08.760 to come back because he's got, you know, what else is he gonna do? Go back to teaching people how to
00:09:13.540 surf? Is he gonna be another, he's gonna go back to being a drama teacher? The man's got nothing. I know
00:09:18.760 he's independently wealthy, but people get bored, and the thing that Trudeau and also Jagmeet Singh
00:09:24.060 love more than wealth or anything like that, or power, they love attention. They love being in the middle
00:09:30.520 of the spotlight. That is the main reason, in my mind, why Jagmeet Singh does not want a federal
00:09:36.760 election early, and he is going to bring up every excuse to push it back till October.
00:09:42.760 Unfortunately, Doug Ford, the fake conservative in Ontario, gave him the perfect reason not to call
00:09:47.660 an election right away and to keep the liberals in power for a few months longer, and because there's
00:09:53.380 an early Ontario election, so Jagmeet can easily just say, there's a lot of voter fatigue in Ontario
00:09:59.040 right now, and all our staff members were just exhausted from helping Merritt Stiles, so you're
00:10:05.060 gonna have to give us a few more months, and also we need to pass some stuff in case we have another
00:10:10.000 trade threat by Trump. That's what Jagmeet Singh's gonna do, mark my words, but Jagmeet, he kind of cares
00:10:16.200 about the pension. He kind of cares about other stuff related to how well the NDP is going to do in the next
00:10:22.100 election and needing more money, but the main thing is that he needs to do well enough in this election
00:10:26.980 to maybe justify still being leader, or justify making a pivot and going somewhere else in his political
00:10:32.940 career, because Jagmeet loves being on television. He loves being on podcasts. He loves streaming video games
00:10:40.140 with AOC and Ilhan Omar, and that guy who said America deserves 9-11, Hassan Piker. He loves being, like,
00:10:48.040 he's like a colorful parrot who goes around collecting shiny objects, and Justin Trudeau is
00:10:53.260 the same way. Both don't love being on a magazine cover more than anything. They would give up every
00:10:58.360 single principle and their left foot to be on People magazine, because they are just very shallow
00:11:03.980 individuals, and now Mark Carney is the guy who is Trudeau's blood bag to get him through this period
00:11:09.840 where he's not prime minister. Boring enough that he's not going to outshine Trudeau, he's still going to lose,
00:11:15.960 but it allows Trudeau not to be the one who personally took the loss, so that in eight years he can come
00:11:21.360 back and say, see, don't you guys all miss me? And by the way, we will not miss him by that point. He
00:11:26.220 will flop on his face. He is not like his father. His father actually had skill. He does not, and I think
00:11:32.380 that's where we're really left. There is a chance Freeland could beat Carney, even in the polling that shows
00:11:37.860 Carney ahead. Some of it shows him way ahead with liberal supporters. I don't quite believe that, just because
00:11:43.480 his name recognition in Canada is still fairly low, and Freeland has much higher name recognition
00:11:49.080 among liberal voters, but a new poll came out, so I don't really believe the mid-50s ones where he's
00:11:54.660 at like 53%, 55%, but another poll from Angus Reid seemed more realistic, where depending on the
00:12:00.240 province, he's at 33 or 35, and Freeland's at 15 or 18. He can be caught there, especially if there's a
00:12:07.020 debate, and he is ducking a debate right now, and it's probably because somebody like Ruby Dalla
00:12:13.640 running for the liberal leadership is going to smoke him. Is Ruby going to win? Probably not,
00:12:19.580 but Ruby has showed that she is not just willing to throw punches, that she probably has like weights
00:12:25.300 in her boxing gloves, that she is going to go and roast him as Trudeau 2.0 and slam him for basically
00:12:31.660 just being like the exact carbon copy of Trudeau's policy without any of the charisma. Ruby has been
00:12:37.760 ruthless, and then Freeland on stage can also go after him for being the insider favorite. He does
00:12:43.540 not want any attention. That's the problem. There are so many liberals online who want to talk about
00:12:48.700 how Mark Carney's brat, and isn't he so interesting, and he's giving so much energy to the party. At the
00:12:54.960 same time, do not let him go on any shows that are not scripted. Do not let him talk to any
00:12:59.660 independent media. Do not put him on a debate stage. By the way, Mark, you're not allowed to
00:13:04.300 leave your house. That is his campaign. He was running the Joe Biden basement campaign from the
00:13:09.400 2020 presidential election in the U.S., and I'm not sure if that's going to win you an election
00:13:15.100 when you would be against pure Polyev as a federal leader, and he's actually interesting. He's actually
00:13:21.560 good long form in discussions. He's good at debating. He's good in hostile media situations,
00:13:26.960 and people, when you look at his approval rating, generally like him, and the Conservative Party's
00:13:31.660 at like 43%. No, Mark Carney's not going to be able to win. Right now, all the pollsters showing
00:13:37.120 the liberals going up, except Ecos, because they're showing like the liberals like surging
00:13:40.640 in an insane way, which is unrealistic to how public opinion works, and there's nothing in the
00:13:45.520 news cycle that would suggest anyone anywhere close to like 30% of Canadians are cool with the
00:13:50.920 liberals, and he has them at like 35. It's crazy, but all the other ones, all the other pollsters that
00:13:56.160 have the liberals realistically bumping up to like 27%, 26%. I'm not even sure if that's real
00:14:03.980 support surging. That might just be a mirage. Like, liberal supporters who were depressed are
00:14:08.960 more likely to say they're voting now, but then in time, they're just going to fall back to 24,
00:14:13.500 23, and they're going to be back in mediocre pre-Trudeau coup numbers. Anyways, so that's it for me today,
00:14:21.480 guys. Remember to like the show, leave a comment, subscribe, do all that great stuff. I might have
00:14:27.000 another video out today. I actually have a fundraiser I'm going to with Pierre Polyev, so maybe I'll post a
00:14:32.660 photo of that later or whatever and tell you what I said to him or whatever. I always like to give
00:14:37.300 politicians advice on marketing and whatnot. In fact, Pierre Polyev has taken our advice from the National
00:14:44.300 Telegraph before. I did an interview with him talking about central bank digital currencies. It
00:14:49.440 was like a very short 30-second interview, and I wrote an article about it where he had given me a
00:14:54.420 general answer that, yeah, I'm against CBDCs. I'm not sure how I would ban them, but in general, I don't
00:14:59.540 want the Bank of Canada addressing it. I rolled out that article. He had been doing nothing on CBDCs
00:15:04.600 before that. My article on Facebook back when you could actually post on Facebook got 12,000 likes. This
00:15:10.780 was during the leadership race. 12 days after that article, his campaign then rolls out all these
00:15:16.000 graphics about how much he's against CBDCs, and it starts being worked into a stump speech where he
00:15:21.540 would be like, and by the way, we're going to ban CBDCs, and we always get a big crowd reaction. I could
00:15:27.040 tell in my original interview, you could tell he was a bit more awkward, like he didn't know if anyone
00:15:31.040 really cared that much about CBDCs. Not that he wasn't against them, but, you know, sometimes talking
00:15:36.720 about something that nobody has a clue about makes you seem like really out of touch,
00:15:40.280 and so I thought, I think he didn't assume that it was going to be a big deal. Article came out,
00:15:44.720 and then the campaign then rolls out all the CBDC stuff. That's not a coincidence. That's called
00:15:50.220 having an actual effect. Anyways, that's truly it for me here. See you guys later.