The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - CBC's Liberal Propaganda is PAPER THIN - Conservatives clawing back support!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.

00:00:05.900 Thank you all for joining me here on your Sunday evening. Today, I want to talk about the obvious

00:00:12.180 propaganda effort to try and demoralize Conservative Party voters to try and keep the

00:00:18.520 Liberal Party's polling lead alive. Are the Liberals currently ahead in the polling right

00:00:23.720 now? Yes, they are. But I want to go over the difference between good pollsters, okay pollsters,

00:00:30.680 and full-on propaganda pollsters. Not every pollster is made equal. They're not all good.

00:00:37.220 They're not all bad. You have to have discernment to understand which one is which. I also want to

00:00:43.300 talk about the media coverage because these two things are converging right now to try and keep

00:00:49.100 Pierre Polyev and the Conservatives out of the game. They want you to think that Polyev and

00:00:53.920 the Conservatives are down and they are not getting back up. From my, I guess, people I know

00:00:59.780 inside of politics in Ottawa, the Conservatives are in fact trailing right now, but with Pierre

00:01:06.560 Polyev's messaging pivot that he made recently on trade and that he will hopefully be making

00:01:11.140 on other topics, that he is starting to battle back the lead that the Liberals have. Let's say

00:01:16.440 the Liberals used to be at maybe plus eight or plus seven in the polls, leading the Conservatives

00:01:21.980 by seven or eight percent. They're probably leading them by four and a half to five points now.

00:01:27.240 And if Polioff keeps his assault up, he can probably get this back to par and maybe even

00:01:32.420 start leading. Mark Carney is in a lot of ways a smart politician. In other ways, he's a very bad

00:01:39.060 politician. He's very good on the topics that he's good on. And when he's bad on a topic, he is

00:01:44.760 horrific. He's boring, which is kind of an asset for him, because when he walks into boardrooms

00:01:50.320 and he's meeting with other world leaders, unlike Justin Trudeau, he doesn't make a clown of himself

00:01:54.860 and he seems like he's doing serious business even while accomplishing nothing. But if Polyev

00:01:59.960 can kind of pierce that facade and get through to the real domestic issues that Mark Carney is not

00:02:05.800 dealing with and move them on to topics that he is deeply uncomfortable with, then he will start

00:02:10.980 falling apart. So in this video, I want to take you guys through a segment on the CBC,

00:02:16.380 then we're going to go through some polling, and then finish off with what the Liberal Party is

00:02:21.100 posting on social media these days, and what Polyev is doing on his European tour. But before

00:02:26.620 we get into it, I just want to remind you guys, if you like the show, make sure to leave a like

00:02:30.720 on the video, subscribe if you are not yet a subscriber, it allows my videos to pop up more

00:02:35.960 often in your feed than if you don't subscribe, and then of course leave a comment about what

00:02:40.960 you think. And I want to plug that if you live in British Columbia, check out the 1BC party.

00:02:47.100 I work for Dallas Brody and the 1BC party in British Columbia. We are growing very rapidly

00:02:52.880 right now because the BC conservatives refuse to actually hold the NDP accountable on the big

00:02:59.020 issues of the day, like indigenous land claims. All they do is basically point out that David

00:03:04.400 Eby's lying. And it's like, wow, that's crazy. Are you guys going to get rid of all these

00:03:09.160 aboriginal land deals get rid of drippa fully and not deal with the uh the uh the reconciliation 0.70

00:03:15.360 industry oh well you have to kind of do it and there's always 10 000 excuses for why they can't

00:03:21.580 actually just do the right thing fully rather than constantly pandering to the other side

00:03:26.480 anyways now this is just me rambling check out the 1bc party now let's get into the segment

00:03:32.500 with the CBC on Rosemary Barton's show and I find I like to consume liberal propaganda both from the

00:03:40.620 party directly as well as from the CBC because it gives you an insight to what their campaign

00:03:45.980 strategy currently is it's all about acting like Carney is you know moving Canada to do heights

00:03:51.980 right now everything's steady everything's professional with him and the liberals have

00:03:57.540 such a big lead what are the conservatives going to do should they replace polyev so check this out

00:04:03.300 it's the prime minister in japan where he wrapped up a 10-day trade tour with stops in india australia

00:04:09.280 and japan obviously um how effective were the prime minister's trade missions how important

00:04:13.440 were those talks between jameson greer and dominic leblanc on friday and what should we make of pierre

00:04:18.200 polyev's overseas trip what does that signal for his leadership let's bring in our sunday scrum

00:04:22.900 Aaron Wary, senior writer for CBC News here in Ottawa.

00:04:25.440 Emily Nicola, a columnist for Le Dauroir.

00:04:27.740 She's in Montreal.

00:04:28.840 And Rob Russo is writer for The Economist, former CBC Parliamentary Bureau chief,

00:04:32.520 joining us from beautiful Calgary today.

00:04:34.300 Good to see everyone.

00:04:35.580 Can I just point out, pretty much all these people are on the left.

00:04:39.800 I think one of these guys, I think the last guy there,

00:04:43.280 I think he's a little bit more of like kind of an old school Tory maybe,

00:04:48.200 but not really.

00:04:49.500 This is what a CBC panel at the end of the day is.

00:04:52.080 None of them technically are from partisan backgrounds, so it technically gets to be a neutral panel, but we know it's not a neutral panel. Independent media websites, you know, Juno News, Rebel, the Western Standard, other independents out there, they'll be honest about the fact that their panels are full of conservative influencers, conservative, you know, think tank people, you know, Canadian taxpayer federation guys who are very conservative.

00:05:19.360 of, they're not hiding it. Rosemary Barton hides it by not, by just constantly portraying this as

00:05:25.220 just kind of a neutral analysis from people with insights into politics, rather than people who

00:05:29.680 are going to give you a very pro-liberal perspective. I'm going to start with the

00:05:34.460 Prime Minister, and then we'll pivot to Mr. Poiliev and what he was up to. It was a big,

00:05:40.320 long trip, Aaron, and there appeared to be a lot of deals that were begun or signed about

00:05:47.180 energy, trade, critical minerals. How important is it that the Prime Minister keep these trips up

00:05:54.560 even as Dominic LeBlanc is trying to get things back on the rails with the United States?

00:06:00.500 Back on the rails because they haven't been actually getting the deal to move forward.

00:06:04.680 The Carney Liberals negotiating position is basically by default always stalled out. So of

00:06:11.200 course Dominic LeBlanc's having to get it back on the rails. It's never been on the rails and it's

00:06:16.140 not exactly Donald Trump's fault. Is he maybe a hard man to negotiate with? Yes, because he's a

00:06:20.980 good negotiator. He always asks for way more than he actually wants. He pushes you, he badgers you,

00:06:26.780 and he tries to get you to give him more than you were willing to when you walked into the room.

00:06:31.600 And it seems like the only thing that carny liberals do is they walk into the room, 0.74

00:06:34.580 then immediately turtle up, say nothing, and then leave disappointed.

00:06:38.920 Yeah, I don't think there's really much of an option at this point. I think it's a bit of a

00:06:42.580 reminder that the job of prime minister at this point and maybe going forward is increasingly

00:06:47.580 international and uh you can't sort of treat foreign affairs and and visits to other countries

00:06:54.000 as sort of a secondary uh concern obviously you know the the thing that always gets said coming

00:06:59.460 out of these trips is you know it remains to be seen what the things that were signed amount to

00:07:05.380 and and sort of what comes next but i think that's sort of a long-term play and you know

00:07:12.900 obviously a lot of what happened this week was overshadowed by iran uh understandably and and

00:07:18.020 for good reason but i think this is really you know an indication that this is kind of the way

00:07:23.380 things have to work from now on that the prime minister has to spend a lot of time abroad

00:07:27.300 has to spend a lot of time in in capitals you know but why the thing again this is why i hate

00:07:34.740 hate the CBC. Those shows are so boring when someone says something, you just assume it must

00:07:40.640 be factual because that was like sleep inducing. No, it's not required for him to go travel

00:07:47.000 internationally and meet with all these foreign leaders and go to their capitals and constantly

00:07:51.720 be signing these deals. The deals are mainly meaningless. The deal they signed in Japan

00:07:56.160 pretty much doesn't do anything. They're all these kind of memorandums of understanding where

00:08:01.060 we sign an agreement saying that maybe one day possibly we could trade a little bit more with

00:08:05.200 each other have a better national security sort of like alignment later on it's like okay um we

00:08:11.900 don't have a military and our economy sucks right now so what are we doing here oh guys we signed a

00:08:18.480 piece of paper with someone from indonesia cool are we gonna start trading with them like 15%

00:08:24.480 more okay well that doesn't make a dent in anything those would be celebratory deals if

00:08:30.320 we were already doing a good job, but we're not doing the basics right. And we're supposed to

00:08:35.100 congratulate Mark Carney for getting these little frill deals. Oh, wow. We're going to move our

00:08:40.340 trade, like our exports with Indonesia from 2.6 billion to like 2.9 billion. It's not a bad thing 1.00

00:08:48.880 to be trading more of them, obviously, but let's have, let's come on guys. Let's focus on the meat

00:08:53.900 and potatoes, which is the U S trade deal. And we've even been signing deals like with China

00:08:59.680 that make the U.S. deal less likely, unless you go with Polioff's plan, something I have been

00:09:04.440 advocating for for around a year. You use China to get a better deal with America. You basically say,

00:09:11.480 I'll tear up everything I have with China. And as long as we can have a zero tariff relationship, 1.00

00:09:16.200 we're basically as close as we can get. And we as Canada, the United States and all the other

00:09:21.220 Commonwealth countries with Canada can team up against China. That's what they should be doing.

00:09:26.560 But they keep basically deliberately making them less attractive to the United States, weakening their negotiating position, and then using the fact that they keep weakening their own position as a justification to go trading with other countries even more that aren't actually going to be able to replace the United States.

00:09:43.520 Both shoring up trade relationships, but also, you know, shoring up relationships with allies.

00:09:48.660 I think it was the first time a prime minister had made a bilateral visit to Australia since 2014.

00:09:53.960 you know it's almost like australia doesn't really matter all that much like we need to

00:09:59.140 shore up our alliances why was anyone kicking canada out anytime soon and any other any

00:10:04.800 country kicking us out of their good books it's worthless we don't need to be reaffirming these

00:10:10.260 relationships we need to be lowering taxes lowering regulations you could literally not

00:10:15.540 even leave the borders of canada and get a better trade deal with the united states by just severely

00:10:20.500 lowering our taxes freaking the americans out that we can live without them because our economy is

00:10:25.300 going to start growing like gangbusters and then they would sign something very quickly but we

00:10:29.300 can't do that because the liberal party is the party of handouts and programs and they will never

00:10:34.100 cut their program spending which means they need to keep taxes very high i think that's the kind

00:10:39.140 of thing that you know we're probably not going to be able to go a decade without visiting australia

00:10:44.260 again. This is just the way the world works and the way Canada has to act at this point.

00:10:52.020 And we will talk about Iran and the government's position on that in the next hour, just so people

00:10:55.880 know. But there has been, I guess, some criticism, Emily, from conservatives that now Mark Carney's

00:11:03.860 doing too much of this, that he's spending too much time trying to diversify trade and not enough

00:11:08.440 time trying to make sure uh the the things you know even rosemary barton is the worst propagandist 1.00

00:11:16.280 because she's so obvious she literally throwing in a laugh there i guess conservatives saying that 1.00

00:11:21.480 they're spending too much time diversifying trade as if it must be a hilarious notion that yes he is

00:11:27.760 in fact spending too much time diversifying trade because you can't diversify away from your closest

00:11:34.660 southern neighbor that has the longest land border shared between two countries on the planet yes you

00:11:41.700 can't really diversify away from that i am sorry we're not going to be able to send enough hard

00:11:46.020 bite potato chips to japan to offset our trade deficit or the the trade that we're losing with

00:11:52.020 the united states which is a deficit but i was just not wanting to confuse people with an act

00:11:56.660 what with the you know a trade deficit's an actual thing i wasn't trying to use language

00:12:01.540 as if i didn't know what i was doing there why why are you so insecure why are you justifying

00:12:05.860 yourself let's just get back to rosemary barton laughing at conservatives making a good point 0.77

00:12:10.340 diversified that now mark carney is doing too much of this that he's spending too much time

00:12:15.140 trying to diversify trade and not enough time trying to make sure uh the the things you know

00:12:20.740 get on on track with the united states um i don't know dominic leblanc had this meeting so obviously

00:12:26.260 there are still conversations happening on that front she's even jumping in throwing her body in 1.00

00:12:31.860 front of every bullet for the liberal party well they're still they're still trying to get back on

00:12:36.820 track but they think we should get this agreement back on track even though we had just implied that 0.98

00:12:41.460 that's a foolish stupid person thing to try and do i despise the way rosemary barton does television 1.00

00:12:49.060 Yes, and Pierre Poirier is abroad himself, or was abroad himself. So I hear the concern. I think the concern is more, and I know we're going to get back to this later, but I think the concern is the executive style leadership of Mark Carney, where it seems like him and maybe one or two close advisors are just taking foreign policy positions from the depth of their brains, and then everybody else learns about it. 1.00

00:13:16.320 And him being so far away from Parliament makes it even more of an interesting position for Canadian democracy where Canadian media are not even privy to interviewing the Prime Minister himself while he's making really important speeches and policy conversations abroad.

00:13:34.220 That being said, this week is also hard for him to politically score points because there

00:13:40.820 was such a media eclipse around Iran.

00:13:42.860 So really, the upside of those trips is just the policy themselves.

00:13:47.340 Well, there is no policy.

00:13:48.740 We're not actually getting anything done.

00:13:50.160 It actually should be a great week for Mark Carney because he originally actually took

00:13:55.240 the correct position on Iran.

00:13:57.360 The United States and Israel are okay to attack the Islamic dictatorship, killing tens of thousands of their own people, as well as spreading terrorism around the Middle East and the rest of the world. 0.86

00:14:08.800 That was a good position.

00:14:10.840 And now he is on position number five or six.

00:14:13.640 He keeps flip-flopping back and forth on whether he's just on side with the U.S. and Israel or he's going to cry tears of sadness over the Ayatollah of Iran dying and that this wasn't following international law.

00:14:27.740 He can't figure out what his position is.

00:14:29.740 So he'll try to make excuses.

00:14:30.920 Oh, well, Carney hasn't had a lot of wins this week because Iran happened. 1.00

00:14:34.380 No, he doesn't have many wins this week because he sucked on Iran so badly and he made himself look stupid. 0.91

00:14:40.100 and it turns out all of his signings around the world aren't really all that substantial when you 0.98

00:14:44.760 stack it up with a real foreign policy issue. So yeah, it's been a bad week because he's not very

00:14:49.440 good at this. What do you achieve on those trips? And that is also hard for us to evaluate abroad

00:14:54.180 because there are certainly certain announcements, but a lot of it is, you know, prepping the

00:14:59.180 relationship. And there's also a lot of variables that are in the air right now because of Iran and

00:15:05.300 the the the spikes uh uh on energy prices and the guys let's silently all vote do we skip over 10

00:15:13.780 seconds because she's saying absolutely nothing oh it is this stuff going on in iran and there's

00:15:19.080 meetings and we have to prep some of these talks for later and he's doing this is just noise we're

00:15:25.540 just going to skip our new caps are changing in real time it just means that what's happening

00:15:31.140 there we go um i i think there there is always the most important audience when a prime minister

00:15:37.540 goes abroad and that's the audience at home that's traditionally been the case i i do think

00:15:42.580 there is much to what aaron was saying though that that there is a a compelling uh necessity for a

00:15:49.300 prime minister to go abroad now um so it's not just about the audience at home i thought mr

00:15:56.580 Karni ran into the stark difference between real politic, which he espoused at Davos,

00:16:03.620 and ideal politic even before he left over a controversy about whether or not India is still

00:16:09.780 interfering in Canada, either in our domestic politics or in our diaspora here. I thought the

00:16:19.140 trip to Japan, which didn't get a lot of attention here in Canada, was very, very important for the

00:16:25.460 domestic audience he uh he did some things with japan that is going to include japan playing a

00:16:31.460 role in the arctic which i think is very important a very important signal to russia and china

00:16:35.700 at the same time oh my goodness nobody cares what's japan gonna do deploy troops know what you

00:16:41.620 need you need a better relationship with the united states all of this is basically like

00:16:47.940 the us the relationship with them solves like 80 of the problems and we keep kind of skirting

00:16:54.580 around the 20%, getting Japan on side, which is going to, you know, solve 1% of the problem.

00:17:00.400 And then Canada is going to try and ramp up its own military presence over the next several

00:17:05.660 years, which maybe resolves 10, 15% of the problem and try and get these other countries

00:17:09.980 involved.

00:17:10.700 Okay, but why, but we keep letting them off the hook or not dealing with the U.S.

00:17:15.840 We just act like it's just some sideshow compared, oh, well, the U.S. versus the rest of the

00:17:20.200 world.

00:17:20.480 Of course, the rest of the world matters more.

00:17:22.620 For Canada, no, it does not.

00:17:24.580 Because it turns out it's easier to ship wood pulp to the United States than it is to ship it to Nigeria.

00:17:32.660 It turns out. Who could have guessed?

00:17:34.840 What we didn't hear a lot about, and we need to hear a lot about, is Japan going to come to the rescue of Ontario's automobile industry?

00:17:44.340 No. No, they're not.

00:17:46.840 We have Donald Trump saying openly he wants cars that are produced in Canada to be produced in the United States.

00:17:52.260 three quarters of the cars that are produced in canada are japanese automobiles we are going to

00:17:58.420 need them not just to maintain that level of manufacturing but accelerate it uh the chinese 0.99

00:18:04.980 entry into the market is going to be slow and a trickle we need japan to step up uh that's

00:18:09.540 something that i think we should follow up on but this this notion of sorry but china's not helping

00:18:14.740 our market they're just selling into our market that's very different they're not letting us

00:18:18.900 manufacture their models. They're just shipping the cars into Canada. That's the difference.

00:18:24.120 Dividends being paid at home, that's changed. We need to go abroad. We need to seek not just

00:18:31.480 political dividends, but economic dividends abroad as well. Okay, let's do a quick round,

00:18:36.080 if we can, on Mr. Poiliev's trips to the UK and Germany, giving speeches, meeting with various

00:18:43.000 politicians um to try and build i think his credibility as a potential leader in a situation

00:18:50.520 where you know as you've all pointed out there's a lot going on in the world and it's hard to get

00:18:54.440 attention what was this a good idea a necessary uh trip that he had to do aaron yeah i think it

00:19:02.200 fits with what we were just talking about in terms of the job of the prime minister being more

00:19:06.120 international i think it also fits within what you've seen from pierre polyev and in terms of

00:19:11.800 kind of tweaking his own presentation, his own sort of public image. I don't know how on the

00:19:19.160 latter, you know, how much that will stick. He still gave an interview when he was in England

00:19:23.640 in which he, you know, talked disparagingly about the the idea of net zero. And

00:19:29.720 Okay. I feel like I'm done with the CBC segment. I can agree it's actually a good idea that

00:19:36.280 Polly have went to Europe is doing this European tour. And people could say,

00:19:40.680 Oh, isn't that hypocritical?

00:19:42.560 I thought you said that Carney's trips are all frivolous. 0.53

00:19:46.520 Yes, but the opposition leader can go and do the same trip

00:19:49.880 to prove he can at least do it better than you.

00:19:52.440 Because the thing is that that doesn't mean that

00:19:54.240 Paulia would actually waste his time doing stuff like this

00:19:56.720 if he were the prime minister.

00:19:58.700 His job is to oppose Mark Carney,

00:20:00.480 and he is doing it by visiting all of these countries

00:20:03.540 and using rhetoric more in line with what Canadians actually want.

00:20:07.400 Talking about exporting energy,

00:20:09.140 talking about lowering immigration when he's on something like the Trigonometry podcast,

00:20:15.100 talking, you know, much more aggressively about how Canada needs to align against China, Russia,

00:20:21.000 and Iran. And we need to, it's just, it's a good look, because he sounds more serious,

00:20:27.120 you know, actually trying to sell Canada rather than oppose the US, which is really what Carney's

00:20:33.260 trips looked more like. He's not actually trying to benefit Canada as much as thumb his nose at

00:20:37.840 the United States. Basically, Kirapali is saying, you can have both, it turns out. But now, I want

00:20:44.740 to move on to the polling, and I want to go over this again to talk about the nuances between good

00:20:51.680 polling, okay polling, and propaganda polls. Now, the one we're looking at right now is one I would

00:20:57.920 call an okay poll. I do not agree with the result, because I find that Leger tends to have a very

00:21:04.480 liberal sampling bias. They are not very good at sort of like counteracting what you would call a

00:21:10.600 response bias. A response bias is the whole idea that when you do a poll, you need to figure out

00:21:18.020 who's going to take the poll. And a response bias is you oversampling people from specific areas or

00:21:26.380 who are openly partisan on one side that ends up giving a completely like a bad picture of what

00:21:32.540 the country actually looks like. So the problem right now is we have pollsters like Leger, who I

00:21:38.400 do not think are correcting for the fact that right now, liberals are far more likely to be

00:21:44.460 answering polls than conservatives, especially urban liberals compared to conservatives in rural

00:21:50.040 areas. We have seen this in previous polls, when they showed that the Toronto samples in many of

00:21:55.200 these polls have these absurd liberal leads of like plus 50 points, leads that don't even make

00:22:00.660 sense. Like you pulled 300 people in Toronto and like 250 of them are voting liberal. That's not

00:22:06.240 even, that's not accurate at all. It's basically saying no one's voting NDP, barely anyone's

00:22:11.920 voting conservative, nobody's voting Green Party, when Toronto tends to have more diversity on who

00:22:17.200 votes for the left-wing parties. And then the conservatives usually hang in there, actually

00:22:21.280 like this poll shows nationally, but usually the conservatives can pull off 35% in Toronto. Yeah,

00:22:27.240 they're not winning anything because the Liberals are at like 50 or something like that, but they,

00:22:32.100 you know, they're a contender in the area in terms of at least being able to bring in quite a few

00:22:36.400 votes. This isn't Montreal where the Conservatives are only getting 8%. This is why Leger really needs

00:22:42.300 to be going back to the chalkboard and figuring out how they can get more accurate samples.

00:22:47.960 The Liberals are not leading by 14 points right now, especially the NDP and the Bloc. I don't

00:22:54.120 think the NDP are going to underperform how they did last election. I think as long as they get

00:22:58.880 rid of Jagmeet Singh and they have a more aggressive leader, they are going to do better.

00:23:02.960 The Bloc Quebecois being at 5% makes no sense. The Parti Quebecois in Quebec provincially is

00:23:09.720 leading the pack right now, and it's a big field. There's like five or six competitive parties in

00:23:15.760 Quebec, and the Bloc Quebecois or the Parti Quebecois are leading like 12 points. They are

00:23:21.240 massively ahead i am sorry the bloc are not only at five percent which would have them like hitting

00:23:27.060 like 25 percent 23 percent in quebec nationally like five percent translates to that uh because

00:23:34.420 obviously the bloc only running quebec five percent in quebec is like 25 percent the bloc

00:23:40.560 is probably more like at seven or eight percent they're not going to underperform how they did

00:23:45.620 last election, which was around 6%, they're only going to go up because the Quebec nationalist

00:23:52.280 forces are on the rise right now. That doesn't mean they're going to separate, but, you know,

00:23:57.500 very aggressive Quebec nationalists are, in fact, doing very well. You're not going to see the

00:24:03.200 bloc doing worse than they did last election. This is how I would say you evaluate a poll.

00:24:09.860 You don't just say, I like that result, it's wrong. The liberals are ahead. They are not 14

00:24:14.720 points ahead. But now I want to show you what I would call a propaganda poll. Like a good pollster

00:24:21.060 right now was actually, I would say, Nanos has moved from okay to good. Previously, they were

00:24:25.880 just okay because they were really not handling their liberal response bias in the summer, and

00:24:30.560 they were the ones showing these insane plus 12 results for the liberals back when they were

00:24:35.340 probably leading by, but not by nearly that much. Spark Insight is literally run by a liberal

00:24:42.360 advocate, like a liberal propagandist runs it, somebody who loves the liberals, hates the

00:24:47.040 conservatives, and that is why you're seeing them put out polls like this. 46% liberal, 31%

00:24:54.360 conservative, NDP 10, other 8, block 5. Okay, starting back off, block is not at 5, they're

00:25:01.940 probably at 6 or 7, at least 6, probably 7 or 8. Conservatives, do you think that the conservatives

00:25:09.320 have somehow lost 25% of the supporters they had last election. You would need to have your leader

00:25:16.300 hit someone with their car and not apologize to get that bad in the polls. What has Carney done

00:25:23.840 to deserve not only maintaining everything he had, but growing at the same time the MVP was also

00:25:29.220 growing? No, he's not leading the conservatives by 15%. This is a propaganda poll, and I guarantee

00:25:38.040 you what people like Bruce Anderson right now, who runs Spark Insight, or Frank Graves, who runs

00:25:44.180 Ecos, they want conservatives to be demoralized. Now, that doesn't mean they're just typing into

00:25:50.040 an Excel spreadsheet what they want the numbers to be. But I don't think they are deliberate. I

00:25:54.160 think they are deliberately doing a bad job. They collect up a bunch of responses. They don't care

00:25:58.940 if they're all coming from urban areas. They don't care that their samples are completely

00:26:03.700 full of partisan liberals they just release the numbers and you have to deal with it i need to

00:26:09.080 tell you guys something do you know that in march this is before carney is even sworn in

00:26:15.020 as the liberal party leader he had won the liberal party leadership but this is before he was sworn

00:26:20.520 in he was literally at the ecos on march 13th said the liberals were leading by 17.7 points 0.99

00:26:29.080 no they were not the ecos has this stupid reputation that oh my goodness they predict 1.00

00:26:35.380 trends before they happen i'm sorry you could say that that means nothing if the if frank 0.98

00:26:42.480 grave said the liberals actually are going to win 100 of the vote in the next election they're

00:26:46.300 going to win and then the liberals win by like a few a couple points and they like get a minority

00:26:52.180 government he can go out there and say well i was right they won didn't they you didn't predict 0.99

00:26:56.360 crap, Frank. You predicted nothing. This poll is worth nothing. Insiders in Ottawa probably 0.99

00:27:03.800 are telling me that the Conservatives are behind, yes, but they're behind by low single digits,

00:27:11.200 behind by four points, five points, six points. Now, that's a substantial loss. If the Conservatives

00:27:17.180 lost the federal election by 6%, they would get blown out in terms of the seat count,

00:27:21.940 Because as we become more of a two-party country, rather than a party country with the NDP clocking at 18%, the Bloc getting nine, and the Green Party getting five, it means that a 6% difference between Conservatives and Liberals leads to a massive difference in seat counts.

00:27:40.580 Because it's pretty much just one or the other in every single riding.

00:27:44.160 There's no NDP grabs this riding and the Greens grab that one, the Bloc grab that one.

00:27:48.900 It's becoming more and more outside of Quebec, liberal or conservative.

00:27:52.820 So if the liberals nationally are winning by six points,

00:27:55.620 that means they're probably getting like 210 seats.

00:27:59.760 But there's a difference between leading by five, leading by six, and leading by 15.

00:28:06.780 Guys, even Trudeau wasn't even getting beaten that badly in 2024.

00:28:12.740 Yeah, there were some polls showing him being beaten by 25,

00:28:15.240 But the more reasonable pollsters at the time were showing him being beaten by like 13, 14, sometimes you get a 17.

00:28:22.520 And he was like the most hated man in the world for Canadians.

00:28:26.080 He was being beaten by Donald Trump in terms of approval.

00:28:29.440 And Canadians were designed from birth to hate Donald Trump in this country, even before they knew who he was.

00:28:35.260 and somehow we're all supposed to assume that polyev is more hated than justin trudeau now

00:28:41.560 or as equally hated as as trudeau circa like july 2024 it just ain't happening people this

00:28:50.900 is meant to make you think well i'm not going to donate to the conservatives i'm not telling you

00:28:55.860 to donate to them do whatever you want i'm just saying that this is meant to go to the big donors

00:28:59.940 and have the next fundraising meeting they have with polyev or any conservative mp and they say

00:29:05.040 I'd love to give you $1,000, man, but you guys are losing by 15 points, Spark Insight told me.

00:29:11.400 They're trying to go to people and say, what's the point of going to that rally? What's the point

00:29:15.020 of going and volunteering? You're losing by 15 points. The funny thing is these same propaganda

00:29:20.200 pollsters were the ones when Trudeau was getting thrown out of the Liberal Party that were showing

00:29:25.180 the Liberals losing by 25 points. I can guarantee you Trudeau was never losing by 25 points. That's

00:29:30.920 like impossible. There are so many default liberal voters, they're never going to do that badly in an

00:29:35.220 election. But it's funny that the pollsters that are showing the liberals way up now were the ones

00:29:40.160 showing the most aggressive leads for the conservatives when the liberal insiders wanted

00:29:44.640 Trudeau out. So when they want Trudeau out, the propaganda firms, which are only a few of them,

00:29:49.960 most of them are good or okay. But the propaganda firms, they went into high gear to getting Trudeau

00:29:55.800 out because they needed him out. So they need as many bad polls as possible. And then as soon as

00:30:00.320 Trudeau's out and Carney wins, then the same propaganda pollster, ECOS, that showed plus 25

00:30:06.520 conservative, suddenly swaps us now plus 17 liberal. No, not how it works. And ECOS is like,

00:30:13.460 oh, well, we were pretty accurate last election. Their last poll said that the liberals were going

00:30:17.100 to win by six points. That would have been majority. It didn't even come close to that.

00:30:21.080 They won by a couple points and then got a minority government. Like two weeks before

00:30:25.420 the election they were predicting an insane like nine point lead and before that 14 points it's

00:30:31.420 called herding what they do is that they give up these insane propaganda numbers to get the people

00:30:37.560 donating to the liberal party getting people jumping on the bandwagon to get conservatives

00:30:42.140 feeling demoralized and then what they do is they heard the numbers at the end to make it look a

00:30:47.900 little better because they don't want to show they don't want to come into the next election

00:30:51.540 like being 12 points off the real result they want to get at least somewhat in the conversation

00:30:57.800 i think frank graves genuinely thought the liberals were going to do better so he thought

00:31:02.500 his plus six was like reasonable when it was actually like way outside the margin of error

00:31:07.020 because the typical margin of error is two points you know you want to say liberals are going to get

00:31:11.740 41 and they get like 42 and a half or conservatives are going to get 39 and they get 41 that's

00:31:17.800 reasonable. Frank is six and a half points outside the margin or so, or like he's four

00:31:24.660 points outside the margin. He is double what the liberals got, and he actually underrated what the

00:31:30.580 liberals got. So no, he's not accurate. He sucks at his job. He is just somebody putting out

00:31:36.500 terrible poll after terrible poll, hoping that the liberals win and the person he hates the most

00:31:42.600 in this world, Pirapaliev loses. Anyways, so that was that, and now I want to get over to some liberal

00:31:49.380 propaganda. And so the liberals are really, I think, running out of stuff to do. I think that

00:31:56.640 they have now, it doesn't mean, again, they're not leading, and I'm predicting some big turnaround

00:32:00.540 here, but their stuff is getting stale. We have right here the liberals saying, we're strengthening

00:32:05.900 our partnerships abroad to diversify our trade, build a more resilient economy, and create high

00:32:10.560 paying careers for canadians and it shows right here in tokyo carney signs agreement with japanese

00:32:15.200 counterpart to expand trade and defense ties okay what did we actually agree to nothing

00:32:23.040 we're not actually doing anything here another one right here mark carney says today in sydney

00:32:29.540 canadians and australian investment leaders announced a new agreement that will make it

00:32:33.280 easier to invest between our countries that means more opportunities for our businesses more growth

00:32:38.720 for our economy and higher paying careers for Canadian workers.

00:32:42.700 Does it, though?

00:32:43.900 We keep having job losses.

00:32:45.760 The funny thing is we keep signing these agreements and we keep losing jobs.

00:32:49.440 Now, they can claim, well, it has a delayed effect.

00:32:54.240 Okay, I agree.

00:32:56.000 Sometimes things have a delayed effect.

00:32:57.720 You do it today and then you see the growth later.

00:33:00.500 But you don't sign tons of these things like they've been doing

00:33:03.240 and then see jobs fall off the cliff.

00:33:05.700 at least people would say, okay, let's not fire anyone because it looks like the economy could

00:33:10.360 start boosting again. Let's just stay where we're at. People are laying people off because it's not

00:33:16.740 happening because the export agreements aren't doing anything. That's the problem. And the

00:33:22.340 businesses don't just lay workers off frivolously. They do it because they don't think that they are

00:33:28.080 going to get any productive value out of it. Here is Mark Carney speaking when I believe he was in

00:33:33.080 India. From the Liberal Party, this post says, Mark Carney and our new Liberal government are

00:33:37.960 focused on what we can control. We're building our economic strength at home and diversifying

00:33:43.220 our trade partnerships abroad to build a more prosperous future for Canadians. Now, let's just

00:33:49.120 listen to this. You'll notice something very quickly about this speech, and I'm not going to

00:33:53.240 say anything until it's done. Canada is clear-eyed about the world as it is, and we are equally

00:33:59.780 be determined to forge a new path in it.

00:34:03.780 We are a confident and ambitious nation, and that confidence, that ambition, brings us

00:34:11.160 here to India to lay and build on the foundations, foundations that have been laid by tens of

00:34:19.520 millions of citizens in both our nations, to work together to create a more resilient,

00:34:25.340 a more prosperous and a more just future for our peoples.

00:34:29.420 That might remind you of every single speech the man has delivered for the past year,

00:34:34.320 especially it's just rehashing a lot of his old Davos language.

00:34:38.320 Now, I've had people say that, and they're right, 0.99

00:34:41.060 that Polyev and the conservatives became too sloganeering in the last election campaign,

00:34:45.760 and they leaned a little bit too much into Pierre Polyev's apple-eating persona.

00:34:51.300 Fair enough, that's a good critique.

00:34:53.020 That's what Mark Carney is doing right now, of trying to be the, you know, the sober-minded, clear-eyed truth-teller about the, you know, he's the seer of how everything is going on in the world right now.

00:35:05.120 At some point, this is going to get old, as things are not actually happening.

00:35:09.960 He keeps talking about how we are diversifying our trade and how we're, like, you know, dealing with the world as it is.

00:35:15.700 But we won't move a muscle to try and deal with America as it is.

00:35:20.820 We keep basically putting it off like it's the broccoli we don't want to eat.

00:35:24.440 That's the problem.

00:35:25.620 He keeps talking about how business savvy he is.

00:35:28.440 Keeps trying to signal how much of a businessman he is.

00:35:31.040 And he even talked about how he's dealt with Donald Trump before.

00:35:34.360 And the man is terrified to actually deal with Donald Trump.

00:35:39.060 Has a couple nice Oval Office visits, but doesn't come away with anything.

00:35:43.260 Because he is too terrified of his Trump derangement syndrome base to actually get a deal done.

00:35:48.820 There are bad things about Trump.

00:35:50.660 there are good things about Trump, but he can't actually deal with Trump as a reasonable person.

00:35:57.360 And is Trump unreasonable at times? Sure. But the thing is that Trump's not that difficult

00:36:01.800 to understand. He's aggressive. He tries to ask for more than he wants, hoping to get what he

00:36:06.700 actually wants under the surface. But the thing is that for Carney to deal with Trump as an actual

00:36:12.780 understandable world leader that's not an enemy, he would have to admit to something,

00:36:17.360 you'd have to admit something about Trump that his base doesn't want to hear, that he is an ally,

00:36:22.100 that he is somebody that Canada should actually have a good relationship with. And so that's why

00:36:26.300 he's just basically making sure he never quite gets to the table and never quite negotiates

00:36:31.940 seriously. His own people basically are not negotiating, acting comatose, so the deal never

00:36:37.080 goes forward so that his base never gets mad at him for signing something with Trump. Because,

00:36:41.560 again, the agreement's not going to be utopia. Nirvana is not for this world, and we are going

00:36:46.460 to have to concede on something to get the americans to the table and signing something

00:36:50.480 oh that's unfair oh well that's real life and the thing is that a lot of the liberal base does not

00:36:56.060 want to live in real life although i do believe there's one third of the liberal base which i

00:37:00.300 would call the business liberals who can be pried away by the conservatives if polio keeps up on his

00:37:06.040 messaging on trade keep saying that we need to be playing hardball we need to be willing to rip up

00:37:10.920 our agreement with china to get an agreement with the united states we need to be and i think he

00:37:14.960 needs to add in we need to be slashing taxes slashing regulations and building economic

00:37:20.520 strength at home making ourselves basically singapore we need to be a very easy place to

00:37:25.740 do business then we can negotiate better aliev needs to be constantly hammering on these economic

00:37:31.680 fundamentals running on a bold reform strategy on economics to get a better trade deal so he can

00:37:38.440 pry away these business liberals who at the end of the day yeah they have a lot of liberal

00:37:42.740 sensibilities but they want a deal signed even if these people privately don't like Trump anyways

00:37:48.500 with all that said I didn't realize this was going to be as long of an episode as it was but

00:37:53.400 that's what happens on the Wyatt show sometimes or whatever the show is called at this point

00:37:58.200 anyways I was going to trail off and talk about something hey guys if you want to support the

00:38:03.700 channel you can always hit that join button below the video and just contribute something

00:38:08.000 small every month. If you're a senior or someone living on a fixed income, I would say do not join

00:38:13.760 the thing. I will always keep all my content free, but if you want to make a contribution

00:38:18.000 that just helps basically make this a full career for me, that would be very helpful. But again,

00:38:23.080 do not economically hurt yourself to do it. Anyways, with all being said,

00:38:26.960 thank you guys for watching, and I'll see you all later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - March 09, 2026

CBC's Liberal Propaganda is PAPER THIN - Conservatives clawing back support!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript