The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 05, 2025


Conservatives retake lead in new polls! (Election Analysis)


Episode Stats

Length

24 minutes

Words per Minute

194.9715

Word Count

4,857

Sentence Count

292

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

In this episode, I talk about the latest polling numbers and how they prove that the Conservatives are actually leading the Liberals in the polls. I also talk about how the Tories are gaining ground on the Liberals, and why a minority government is actually possible.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I have some great polling news for the Conservative Party and Pierre
00:00:05.860 Poly of today. In previous videos where I've been talking about polling, often I am talking about
00:00:11.540 polls that show the Liberals leading, but I'm always wanting to highlight numbers underneath
00:00:16.300 the national numbers that prove that the Liberals lead was far softer than many wanted to make it
00:00:21.880 out. And I think that these new numbers coming out right now are proving me exactly correct.
00:00:26.440 For an example, I would sometimes highlight a poll from Angus Reid. I don't even think they're a very
00:00:31.760 good firm, at least in this election cycle. They would have the Liberals up nationally on the
00:00:36.540 Conservatives by four to six points. But if you scroll down and read some of the sub numbers,
00:00:42.320 it would prove that things weren't actually looking as good for the Liberals as the national numbers
00:00:47.340 would make it seem. So they would poll voter enthusiasm and the Liberals would have 51%
00:00:52.840 of their supporters saying that they are definitely going to vote. But the Conservatives, and this is
00:00:58.160 a big sample for both parties, the Conservatives would have 72% of their supporters saying they're
00:01:04.220 definitely going to vote. In fact, with the Liberals, like 5% said they weren't going to vote at all,
00:01:09.120 and another 6% said that they were unlikely to vote. That's really, really bad for the Liberals,
00:01:14.820 and I think we are seeing that starting to bear fruit negatively for the Liberals, that they were the
00:01:19.880 shiny new toy because Justin Trudeau was swapped out with Mark Carney. And now as the kids are
00:01:25.060 playing with it, they're realizing that this is junk just like Justin Trudeau was. The tariff issue
00:01:29.800 was off the table for the Liberals. They're trying to keep it alive, but the thing's dead. There was no
00:01:34.400 direct sweeping tariffs on Canada from the United States. Yeah, there's the auto sector tariffs,
00:01:39.600 and there's steel and aluminum tariffs. Even then, a lot of this actually spells good things for
00:01:44.440 Canada with all the tariffs on other countries. Canada may become an import hub. Where other countries
00:01:49.160 import their stuff to Canada first, so then it can be manufactured a little bit further,
00:01:53.660 so then it can be moved to the U.S. without any tariffs. So, you know, there's a silver lining
00:01:59.180 there. But I want to get into some of the numbers that are coming out now, proving that the
00:02:03.180 Conservatives actually have a lot of national muscle. It's not just these sub figures that I'm
00:02:08.140 looking at saying that the Conservatives are doing well. Those were important. Now it's even the top
00:02:12.900 line numbers showing that the Conservatives are leading. Now, don't get me wrong. The Conservatives need
00:02:17.900 to do much better in order to actually pull a government out of this. The advantage the Liberals
00:02:22.880 have is that if their people actually do show up, they have a far more efficient vote because
00:02:28.520 the Conservatives will win a rural riding by Saddam Hussein numbers. They can win Athabasca like
00:02:35.100 they're Idi Amin, and it doesn't mean anything. They need to be able to win certain ridings in Ontario,
00:02:40.980 in British Columbia, in Quebec, in Atlantic Canada, if they want to nickel and dime their way up to at least
00:02:46.140 a minority government. And I consider a minority government a big win for the Conservatives because
00:02:51.200 if Polyev can even govern for five months, I think Canadians are going to see, oh, that's why he was
00:02:57.400 telling the Liberals that they should do this and that. This is at least getting a bit better with
00:03:01.740 the Conservatives in. You know, things aren't going to get much better until they have a majority, but
00:03:05.800 if they can even do a couple of the things they promised in a minority government, if they can even
00:03:11.560 get a partial version of it passed, if they then go to a new election within a year, they will easily
00:03:16.520 get a majority. So our goal as Canadians is just to get these people into a minority at least, so then
00:03:22.040 we can get a majority later. Can we get into majority now? Sure, but let's just focus on like Moneyball,
00:03:28.200 getting on base, let's just get across the finish line and get some form of a government. So before I get
00:03:33.320 into the numbers, guys, make sure to like this video, subscribe to the channel if you've been liking my
00:03:38.200 election coverage and then leave a comment. It helps the videos in the algorithm and I genuinely
00:03:42.840 like to scroll through and read the comments three or four times just scrolling through all the newest
00:03:48.120 ones to see what people are saying. Anyways, now without further ado, let's jump into the first pollster
00:03:55.000 I want to highlight today, and that is Abacus Data. Now this poll actually has its top line number in a
00:04:00.760 tie. We have the Conservatives at 39, Liberals 39, NDP 11, Block 6, Greens 3, and PPC 2. You will detect
00:04:09.560 that this is not quite 100%. There are a lot of undecided people out there still, as to be expected.
00:04:15.320 We are early on to an election, but this is an improvement for the Conservatives, considering that
00:04:20.440 it was just last week that they actually had the Liberals leading in their poll. But now, if you actually
00:04:26.280 dig down a little bit deeper, and I think that this is important to do, and you look at those saying
00:04:30.600 that they are certain to vote, you can see Shreya Teest here says new Abacus data poll among those
00:04:35.640 certain to vote, the Conservatives now have a lead of 2%. Liberals are down at 40, NDP 9, Block 6,
00:04:43.000 Greens 2, PPC 1. Now obviously both the Liberals and the Conservatives gain between just all voters and
00:04:49.080 certain to vote people because the NDP is a very squishy group of people these days. But what's most
00:04:54.600 interesting is, look, from last week's poll from Abacus data to this week, the Liberals with certain
00:05:00.200 to vote people have dropped one and the Conservatives have gone up three. So a four-point swing in a
00:05:06.280 single week has occurred between the Liberals and the Conservatives. If the Conservatives can even just
00:05:11.480 gain 1% a week right now in the certain to vote category over the Liberals, then we're easily in a
00:05:18.120 government. We are easily falling into governmental range for the Conservatives. They need to beat the
00:05:23.240 Liberals probably by two and a half to three points to get a minority government. They probably need
00:05:28.440 to beat them by eight points to get a majority. It's just the way Canadian politics works. Liberals
00:05:33.320 have an extremely efficient vote. They win a lot of their ridings with like 42%, whereas an average
00:05:39.240 Conservative riding is one with like 53% because of that heavy rural vote that the Conservatives have.
00:05:45.560 In the cities, their votes become far thinner and they need to be allocated properly
00:05:49.640 to actually pull a riding out. But now I want to jump over to a different pollster.
00:05:55.320 This one had the Conservatives like falling behind a lot last week. It was crazy how bad that they were
00:06:01.720 doing last week. And this is a pollster I trust, Innovative Research. And it might have just been
00:06:05.880 a really bad week for the Conservatives in that poll, but here is Sheree Attiste. He does a good job
00:06:10.680 presenting all this stuff on Twitter. Give them a follow their real Albanian patch or whatever,
00:06:16.200 real Albanian patriot. He's not even Albanian. It's like a joke or whatever. But new innovation
00:06:22.040 research poll, the Conservatives at 38%, Liberals 37%, NDP 12%, Block 6, Greens 4, and other two.
00:06:31.000 Now, obviously again, with the two top parties only in the upper 30s and the NDP at 12, there are a lot
00:06:37.320 of undecided people out there. So a lot of people that the Conservatives can still win over. And this is
00:06:43.160 a good poll, though, for the Conservatives. Because as the plus four and the plus one are representing
00:06:47.640 for the Liberals and the Conservatives, the Liberals have gained one percent since last week, but the
00:06:53.400 Conservatives have gained four. The Conservatives had a massive resurgence. And it's because,
00:06:58.440 frankly, not only has Pierre Pauly been generating massive amounts of enthusiasm and energy through these
00:07:05.960 record-breaking rallies. He had 6,500 people show up in Oshawa. He's had 5,500 people in Surrey.
00:07:15.160 And what's most impressive of all is actually 1,800 people, 2,000 people in Charlottetown.
00:07:21.320 PEI is a province of like 1,600, maybe 180,000 people. And he brought in like 1.2%, 1.3% of the
00:07:32.840 population to come and see him speak. That's massive. And I was told by people on the ground
00:07:38.440 there like, yeah, not many people drove in from out of province to that rally because you'd have to
00:07:42.840 drive in over like an hour and a half if you were coming from Nova Scotia or New Brunswick
00:07:47.960 at the closest. And so that demonstrates that even in a province where all three ridings last election,
00:07:54.520 and actually for the previous, I think three or four elections, have all gone Liberal. If the
00:07:59.000 Conservatives can even grab one, just one PEI seat, the Conservatives are really in business
00:08:04.760 in Atlantic Canada. Because my theory about this election is that we don't actually need the GTA.
00:08:10.360 Are there some GTA ridings the Conservatives could win? Sure, Mississauga, Brampton,
00:08:14.520 heavy South Asian populations who hate SOGI, hate gender theory, really hate taxes. Those people
00:08:20.760 might come out in droves and they're very hard to pull so that area of Canada will seem bright,
00:08:25.640 bright red, because it was red last time. And the polls will or the poll models will have a bias to
00:08:30.840 what they were last time. But those groups of Canadians are very apt to swing between the parties.
00:08:36.600 The one thing the Conservatives have to stop doing is stop kicking Hindu voters in the face. There was
00:08:41.640 a Hindu candidate for the Conservatives, I believe in Brampton, who was kicked out. And there was some
00:08:46.120 story like, oh, he was colluding with the Indian government. And that is basically just him sending
00:08:51.720 out a post on Facebook criticizing Kalistanis. Probably some idiot in the background of the
00:08:57.320 Conservative Party, rose a big fuss, you have to get rid of a rhyme out. And the party's like,
00:09:02.440 okay, we'll get rid of them. Dumb move, because guess who is the second most conservative voting
00:09:07.880 group in Canada after Evangelical Christians? Hindus. Hindus are hardcore Conservative voters.
00:09:13.720 Like, I think Evangelical Christians vote Conservative 76%. And then Hindus vote Conservative like 70%. So those
00:09:23.240 two groups like gun owners and business owners are like your bread and butter as conservatives. So you've
00:09:28.360 got to do something to get those people on side. Because in fact, I've seen Hindus are going to vote PPC
00:09:32.920 because they hit all the parties. But yeah. And so that's just to say you don't need the GTA,
00:09:39.000 although there's bright spots. What you need is Southwestern Ontario, you need Mississauga,
00:09:44.360 not Mississauga, blah, Niagara, you want Windsor, you want some of those ridings, you don't need all
00:09:49.000 of them, but you want some of them. You want to win East Ontario, you want to grab out one extra Ottawa
00:09:53.720 riding, you want to grab out like Thunder Bay, or James Bay, and then you just want it to be a standstill
00:10:00.200 in Atlantic Canada. If you can take half or even a third of the Atlantic Canadian provinces, perfect.
00:10:04.760 If you can then grab up about 10 seats in BC, great. If you can snag one extra seat in Alberta,
00:10:10.840 great. If you can snag one of the three territories, great. We are in business getting a minority
00:10:15.480 government. Again, the outskirts of Winnipeg is a great area for the conservatives. So that's just my
00:10:22.440 vision for what the conservatives need. If we are getting to that 170 number, or we're even trying to
00:10:29.160 get close to have the biggest plurality, you just need to sort of nickel and dime these bedroom
00:10:34.680 communities, suburban areas that have a little bit of rural mixed into them, or suburban parts of cities,
00:10:40.360 you can pick those up, you're ready to go. So I want to get into some other polls, I want to highlight
00:10:45.400 this, I've highlighted this in another video. And this again, this is a secret card in the back pocket
00:10:52.360 of the conservatives, that's going to make it far easier on election day. So as we're seeing these big
00:10:57.000 rallies, you'll see videos of pure poly of walking outside. And there's like working class guys there
00:11:02.600 who couldn't get in because it was too packed, who still want to like shake his hand, you know,
00:11:06.440 take a selfie with them. And they're like guys in their like, 20s, they're like 23 year old guys,
00:11:11.720 they're not political junkies like myself dressed up like, you know, Steve Urkel here.
00:11:16.200 They're guys in hoodies, jeans, they just got off of work, probably working with their hands somewhere,
00:11:21.960 and they still want to show up and see pure poly of. Do you think even though maybe those
00:11:26.760 guys were too young to vote last election, but those same type of guys, were they showing up
00:11:30.760 for O'Toole? Were they showing up for Andrew Scheer? I like Andrew Scheer, but I don't think
00:11:34.680 Scheer had the appeal to those type of younger working class men. Were they showing up for Harper
00:11:40.680 in 2015? I don't think so. I don't think that group of guys has ever shown up for anyone,
00:11:46.920 not even the Liberals, the NDP before. They didn't care. Maybe 2015, that type of guy voted
00:11:52.520 for the Liberals because of pot, but not this election. And that is why in the polls, they
00:11:58.680 might be heavily underestimating the Liberals because, or the Conservatives, because like
00:12:03.160 David Coletto from Abacus Data here shows, 46% of non-voters, people who did not vote in 2021,
00:12:11.160 people who are low propensity voters, 46% are going to vote conservative, saying they are
00:12:16.840 certain to vote. So these are non-voters saying they will vote this time, 46% voting conservative,
00:12:21.960 only 34 voting Liberal, and 11 NDP. And that's a hard group to poll. It's hard to tell because
00:12:28.680 I've been talking to some pollsters, talking to people who do poll modeling behind the scenes,
00:12:33.160 and they've told me that I am right on, that non-voters might swing all of these polls,
00:12:38.760 might show that all these polls are wrong, and the Conservatives might win like 42% in the vote,
00:12:43.400 and the Liberals only win like 36% or 35%. Because even if a non-voter is going to show up
00:12:50.440 and vote, it's very difficult to tell how big of the national poll or the national vote they're going
00:12:55.960 to make up. Because even if they're certain to vote this time, that doesn't mean that those 24-year-old
00:13:01.960 guys in their work clothes outside of a rally, they're not going to pick up a poll and answer one.
00:13:06.440 They're not going to join Leger and Angus Reid's poll sample online and start answering polls for
00:13:12.760 credit cards. They're too busy, you know, working a construction site or they work in some sort of
00:13:18.360 auto plant. They're not doing anything. They're landscaping. They're not doing anything online
00:13:23.400 or on the phone in the middle of the day. They're electricians. That's not their bag. And so many of
00:13:29.400 these pollsters, I had another one show me that their non-2021 voter poll, and again, it's hard to
00:13:35.800 get a massive sample size, but they still have like over 100 people answer this question. They said 50%
00:13:41.400 of their non-voter polls are showing that they're going for the Conservatives. That is wild. By the
00:13:48.120 way, I highlighted this in another video. I really hope the Conservatives do this because it's such a big
00:13:53.640 vote getting issue. I helped Kolosovski strategies put together a poll question. They just asked if I
00:14:01.800 wanted to include something, if I could generate an interesting idea. And we had agreed on a poll
00:14:06.120 about how much immigration should be reduced. And we pitched the idea to people, literally over 1100
00:14:12.600 respondents. Would you be okay with cutting immigration by 75% from around 450,000 people a year,
00:14:19.640 400,000, I think is exactly what it is right now, down to just 100,000? 75% of respondents
00:14:27.080 want the immigration to be reduced to only 100,000 permanent residents a year. And I know there's
00:14:32.200 always that kind of PPC guy who's like, why isn't it zero? Well, because you want a little flexibility.
00:14:36.520 What happens if a guy is leaving from Iran and he wants to work in oil and gas in Canada and he hates
00:14:41.320 the regime there? I'm not just going to be like, well, we don't have any room because we made it
00:14:44.840 artificially zero. Make it 100,000, have strict values tests and means tests and make sure that
00:14:50.680 people don't bring 10 dependents with them. And I think the immigration system can work. 100,000 is
00:14:55.720 well below how many houses we build, which helps a lot of young millennials and Zoomers actually be able
00:15:01.720 to buy housing who are still stuck in their parents' basement. Even in our poll, 75% of people wanting
00:15:07.000 it to be 100,000. Even the NDP, 58% of NDP voters think that's a good idea. 73% of liberals, 83% of
00:15:15.080 conservatives. This is something that I hope Polyev makes a big pivot on because her current promise is
00:15:21.160 saying, let's lower it to 200,000 to 250,000 because that's within the range of how many houses we build a
00:15:27.320 year. Sure, and I know it's not like each immigrant occupies one house, but you want the deficit of
00:15:34.680 immigrants to housing being built to be quite large for at least five to seven years so that
00:15:40.040 the markets can all settle back down. I've heard people say to me, well, people wouldn't go for
00:15:46.760 that because their housing prices would lower. It's like, guys, I'm taking off my glasses to
00:15:52.600 emphasize my seriousness here. Who cares? Who cares? You bought a house in the 90s or the early 2000s for
00:16:00.040 like $350,000. And it's like worth 1.7 million now. I get it. It was a great grab. Can you let
00:16:07.640 your house price fall $100,000 so that somebody can buy something else? Please. But anyways, I was
00:16:15.080 being a little bit snarky here for a second. But I just want to highlight now why exactly I don't trust
00:16:22.200 certain pollsters. So I just want to bring up the, what is it the numbers for? I want to bring up the
00:16:28.200 ECOS numbers. I'm not trying to be like a cheerleader. I'm not just highlighting polls
00:16:33.720 that are good for the conservatives. I do want the conservatives to win. And there are so many
00:16:37.480 people who are very doomerish out there. Every time a liberal poll comes out, a good liberal poll,
00:16:43.000 they're like, let's leave the country. Let's pretend we're different people, change our names,
00:16:47.960 move to Guatemala. It's not helpful. And so I tend to show the bright side of things. But I'm also
00:16:53.480 showing the realistic stuff. Because every time I say something about the polls, it tends to work
00:16:58.200 out. I've had people come to me like, Wyatt, you were wrong about BC. You thought the BC conservatives
00:17:02.600 were going to win. And then they didn't. Like, did you see how tight the election was? I said 75%
00:17:07.720 shot they win. The conservatives came within 200 votes in three ridings of winning. So, you know,
00:17:13.080 get off my back, man. But here's ECOS numbers. This proves why I discount certain pollsters.
00:17:20.360 This is their top line number, if I can find it. This is their, this is the sub numbers. I want to
00:17:26.600 find the top line numbers. Their sub numbers were absolutely insane. Okay, I don't think it really
00:17:32.200 matters. They had the liberals at like 48% and the conservatives at like 34. It made no sense at
00:17:39.080 all. Or actually 50%. See right here? Their poll had the liberals at 50.5, conservatives 33.1,
00:17:45.320 new democrats 6.9, and so on and so forth. They have the, they have the liberals leading in Alberta.
00:17:52.680 They have the liberals at 45% in Manitoba, 55% in Ontario, in Quebec 46% in the block only at 20%.
00:18:01.080 Atlantic Canada 67%. This is why I don't trust pollsters like abacus, sorry, like, like ECOS.
00:18:09.560 Abacus Innovative, Cole Solisky, Main Street, Main Street's even fairly bearish on the conservatives.
00:18:16.440 They tend to be pretty bearish on the conservative numbers, still have them trailing by like two and
00:18:21.160 a half. But they showed the liberals at the start of the race at like five and a half percent,
00:18:25.240 six percent lead. And it's been reducing over time as many of those soft liberals move back towards the
00:18:31.080 conservatives. But when I see ECOS putting out crap numbers like this, I stop caring what they're saying.
00:18:39.080 If you see any pollster say plus nine for any party, they're lying, or at least they suck at their
00:18:44.680 jobs. Do you really think this is a plus 10% election, a plus 15% election like this ECOS poll is trying to
00:18:51.560 claim for anybody? Not a chance. It's a knife fight. We know it's a knife fight. And we, it's probably
00:18:57.960 unlikely that any party is going to win a majority government at this point. I would give a 10% shot
00:19:02.760 that the liberals or conservatives get a majority government. It's just not that type of an election
00:19:07.480 right now. Even Nanos, when they put out a plus nine for the liberals that has them absolutely
00:19:13.160 front running it in Atlantic Canada, like 60%, not a chance. Do you see Polyevs crowds in the
00:19:20.200 Atlantic provinces? Do you see the fishermen protesting the liberals? Regular guys, you can
00:19:25.400 tell are not party activists, 150 of them showing up because they hate the liberals fishing policies
00:19:31.160 in their government. So we're like, what am I supposed to do? I'm not just highlighting things
00:19:37.240 because it's great for the conservatives because it doesn't do the conservatives one good thing
00:19:41.240 to lie about where they're at. I'm being realistic. I am wanting the conservatives to win and I am
00:19:46.440 highlighting numbers that demonstrate the path to victory. I can even show you the liberal path to
00:19:51.400 victory as well. It's not as interesting. It's really that they end up basically holding ground.
00:19:56.440 They hold on to Kingston and the islands. They hold on to Cambridge. They hold on to Kitchener-Conestoga.
00:20:01.720 They very much hold on to these suburban Ontario ridings. They make a few gains in Calgary. They
00:20:08.200 make some gains in Edmonton. It's mostly about where the liberals already do well. They hold on
00:20:13.080 and they expand. The conservatives have a much more eclectic path to victory. They need one seat
00:20:19.000 like in Montreal. They need an extra seat around Quebec City. They need another seat
00:20:23.400 out in like the they need to pick up Kingston. It's very much like targeted little areas that they
00:20:30.120 need where the liberals are just kind of like these big dense balls of urban ridings and if they can
00:20:34.520 expand their appeal a little bit out to the suburbs they can take the whole field. And so I always see
00:20:40.120 politics as kind of like a battle map. Like the conservatives will launch their ads and it's like
00:20:43.880 we had to hit the area with artillery then you send your troops in to take it. And the conservatives are
00:20:47.800 very much in this kind of clean that phase where they have a lot of these suburbs surrounded with rural
00:20:52.280 ridings and they need to now suck their volunteers out of those areas and start finding working class
00:20:57.480 neighborhoods in some of these communities that are very tired of how condescending the liberals have
00:21:02.520 been to people who are working class, people who work with their hands, who work in trades, business
00:21:06.920 owners. That's the profile of a conservative voter. The profile of a liberal voter is frankly somebody
00:21:13.320 who is retired and wealthy. Not all people, obviously a lot of you might fit that demographic but
00:21:19.080 you're conservatives. But there is a type of person who lives in suburban Toronto who is very well off.
00:21:25.640 They are insulated from all the bad policies they vote for and they are voting liberal because
00:21:30.200 my goodness I can't vote for that that Polyev guy. He's like Trump somehow. And even if you were to
00:21:35.080 ask them what Trump's done that's that bad, outside of tariffs they probably couldn't articulate anything.
00:21:40.360 I want to highlight this last thing. There's this like mission that CBC has been on. By the way,
00:21:46.440 they are being offered another 150 million dollars a year by Mark Carney. They just seem to go around
00:21:52.120 and complain that Polyev doesn't let them sit on his lap and like ask them questions all day long,
00:21:56.920 even though they've been constantly demonstrated to be like bad actors when they ask questions,
00:22:01.480 but take a look at this. This is our last day with the conservative campaign and we have faced some very
00:22:06.440 tough message control from the party, not only breaking with tradition in the sense that we are
00:22:11.560 not allowed to accompany the campaign, but also we've seen great control over the questions. We have not
00:22:16.760 been allowed to ask any questions during the week that we've been with the conservatives.
00:22:20.120 Uh, today we made an effort to get a question and they told us that we could ask one, but that it
00:22:25.880 had to be my colleague, Tom Parry, who asked the question. We responded that I was the one who had
00:22:29.800 the question and we preferred that I asked it. At that point, they took our question away and gave
00:22:33.800 it to another outlet. We've also seen efforts to find out. Good, good. Don't give them a question.
00:22:38.520 There's this big push liberals are doing right now to like make the CBC one of their big election
00:22:43.160 issues that we're going to save the CBC. How many people watch the CBC? It's like less than two
00:22:48.200 percent of Canadians. And there was this ridiculous article that came out like, oh,
00:22:52.040 but it's hurting rural people to take the CBC away. No, there's no, who do, who do you think
00:22:56.600 rural people are big CBC fans? They don't care. Oh, it's because sometimes CBC will cover something
00:23:01.880 that going on their town. They don't care. They don't care. There's already local outlets. And
00:23:07.000 frankly, a random guy on Facebook is probably doing a better job of keeping up on what's happening on city
00:23:11.960 council. The CBC employee that just reads whatever the council minutes are, writes up a crappy article
00:23:19.080 and quotes the most progressive person on city council and some activist who thinks that everything
00:23:23.000 needs to be rainbow colored. That's all they do. Nobody actually likes these people. And they're like,
00:23:27.880 oh, they took away our question and gave it to another outlet. Sorry, would the CBC cover back in
00:23:32.600 the day when True North and Rebel News and all the other independent outlets were banned from the
00:23:37.880 debates. They were not allowed to ask any questions. And whenever they did get a question
00:23:41.720 after having to sue get to get into debates, they would just get like attacked and bad mouth.
00:23:46.120 Is that not, is that something that the CBC has ever cared about? Of course not.
00:23:49.800 They deserve to take a walk in the snow. I'm like, they won't let us on their private jet.
00:23:53.880 As I said in my last video, um, the conservative campaign is going to spend
00:23:58.280 far less than probably $50 million in total. And you guys have a budget of 1.4 billion.
00:24:05.320 Plus they do get some ad revenue because naturally you cannot run a news outlet that
00:24:09.160 big and not generate some ad revenue. And they are somehow whining that they like,
00:24:14.360 we're not allowed on their private jet. Good, good. Literally anyone should be
00:24:18.280 occupying a seat instead of a CBC report. And CTV news tried to slander Polyev and Brian Patterson
00:24:24.280 at, uh, at like a news conference lat, like, uh, literally yesterday. And we're supposed to be
00:24:29.000 like, oh, the legacy media really needs to be engaged with more. Polyev should do more podcasts,
00:24:33.320 frankly. Anyways, so that should be it for me today, guys. Uh, make sure to like the video,
00:24:38.040 subscribe to the channel, leave a comment, do all that great stuff, keep up with my federal
00:24:41.640 election coverage. And of course, uh, hopefully there's new polling news I can talk about in a
00:24:45.960 week, but I'm going to probably stake, stick more to sort of the rhetorical side of politics
00:24:49.960 in my next few videos. So anyways, see you guys later.