The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 14, 2025


Conservatives take 3% lead over Liberals for first time in poll!

Hosted by
Mentioned
Carney runs from press after tariff strategy FAILS! Mark Carney refuses to fire Liberal staff spreading disinformation!

Episode Stats


Length

17 minutes

Words per minute

191.84

Word count

3,406

Sentence count

136

Harmful content

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Even when the polls were showing the Liberals losing ground over the past few weeks, there was always hope that the Tories were going to make a come back. Well, that hope has been vindicated by a new Main Street Research poll that has the Tories leading the Liberals by 3 points.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. We have some very good polling news today for Pierre Polyev and the
00:00:05.780 Conservatives that I feel like vindicates my optimism over the past few weeks even when the
00:00:11.340 polls were showing the Liberals ahead by four or five points. The Conservatives are not just
00:00:16.100 regaining some momentum and reducing the Liberals' lead in many polls, they are actually taking the
00:00:21.540 lead in polls that have never showed them leading during this entire federal election.
00:00:26.160 Main Street Research started out this race showing the Liberals leading the Conservatives by five
00:00:32.880 points and now as of today the Conservatives are leading by three points. That is a major turnaround
00:00:40.680 especially because in the period of the last 22 days at times in the Main Street tracking poll the
00:00:47.500 Liberals were literally leading by seven or eight points. It looked like it was going to be a blood
00:00:52.240 bath but the reason I was optimistic for three weeks is that when you actually went below the
00:00:58.140 national top line number saying where the Liberals and Conservatives were on a national level you saw
00:01:03.920 a lot of weakness with the Liberals. I'm going to get into it in just a second. I just want to do my
00:01:08.680 normal plugs of saying, hey guys, like the video, subscribe to the channel if you're not yet a
00:01:14.020 subscriber and leave a comment on the topic of the day. It really helps the video out on the algorithm
00:01:18.880 and I always like to scroll through and see what you guys think. Got that boilerplate out of the way
00:01:23.880 now we can get into this in more detail. So when I say the Liberals were weak under their surface
00:01:29.700 when you actually pulled voter enthusiasm in even in some of these really trash polls like Angus Reid
00:01:36.000 what you found was that only around half of Liberals were saying they are definitely voting Liberal
00:01:41.380 and then a bunch of people were somewhat likely to show up and then kind of unlikely to show up and
00:01:46.740 then not likely at all to show up. Whereas with Conservatives it was like across the board
00:01:50.920 high levels of voter enthusiasm and we see this in Pierre Polyev's rallies. This is genuinely a unique
00:01:58.620 talent of Pierre Polyev to be able to entertain crowds of thousands of people that not only does
00:02:04.660 Mark Carney lack the ability of, this is an ability that probably politicians in Canada haven't had since
00:02:10.320 the 60s or 50s back when people used to show up in crowds to see a random guy talk about political
00:02:15.580 issues of the day. So right now we have a very fired up Conservative base that is starting to eat
00:02:22.180 into the Liberal numbers. We've seen from 338's voter simulator that in fact the Conservatives could win
00:02:29.200 government even getting a smaller amount of the popular vote than the Liberals and this is because
00:02:36.740 the math for the Conservatives has completely changed. The Conservatives are not just a Western
00:02:42.300 stronghold party that hopes it can grab a couple ridings in the East. In fact the Conservatives could lose
00:02:48.180 a couple of ridings in Alberta and Saskatchewan but win the election because they've become so popular
00:02:54.000 in working class ridings like in Burlington, like in the Hamilton area, Atlantic Canada, Niagara. There's a lot 0.99
00:03:02.100 of working class kind of parts of the country that have swung hard behind the Conservatives because they are
00:03:07.720 so tired of the contempt that the Liberals and to a lesser extent the NDP seem to have for people who
00:03:13.760 actually work with their hands. So I want to get into some of the regionals of what this Main Street
00:03:19.040 poll is showing and sort of how remarkable this comeback really is. It's both remarkable as well
00:03:26.900 as predictable. I just want to get that out there but it is a big comeback considering I was having people
00:03:31.400 dooming all over the place saying what's even the point? Why don't we just move out of the country
00:03:35.880 because the Liberals might win this thing anyways? So going back to day one of the Main Street poll,
00:03:42.300 we had the Liberals at 41%, the Conservatives at 36%, and the one thing I will throw out there is the
00:03:47.960 thing I don't trust Main Street polls for is how low they have the NDP and how often low they also have
00:03:54.140 the Bloc Québécois. I really don't think that the NDP is only going to get 6% of the vote while the
00:04:00.380 PPC, a completely dead in the water party that didn't even get candidates in one quarter of the
00:04:06.120 ridings in terms of they missed one quarter of the ridings. I don't think the NDP is only going to
00:04:10.300 triple the PPC vote. The NDP is probably going to come around 10%, 9%, maybe 11%, and it's mostly
00:04:18.060 going to be at the expense of the Liberals. I think what Main Street has is a sample that is very,
00:04:24.000 very much dominated by hardcore major party supporters. And so when we see the Liberals go
00:04:32.620 from leading by 5% to now the Conservatives leading by 3%, in fact, the lead might be even
00:04:39.500 better than you think when you acknowledge the fact that I don't think, like it shows today,
00:04:44.700 the NDP are at 5% and the Bloc are at 4%. The Bloc have not really done anything to embarrass
00:04:50.000 themselves over the past three and a half years other than the fact that they're the Bloc and we
00:04:54.320 should point and laugh at them more often because it's a Quebec separatist party and I'm an Albertan
00:04:58.720 so I have to cartoonishly dislike them. But they shouldn't be at half of what they had last time,
00:05:04.760 nor is the NDP really only going to come in at 5%. Jagmeet Singh is incompetent, but they have been
00:05:10.320 dumping money into the areas where they want to keep incumbents. So the NDP may lose a portion of their
00:05:16.900 vote, but they're not going to contract from having 18% last election to literally less than
00:05:23.500 a third of it at 5% this election. And if Conservatives are leading even before I make that
00:05:28.580 adjustment, that means the Conservatives may be ahead by anywhere from four to five points.
00:05:34.700 Now I want to bring up some of the sub numbers. I'm only going to show you a small peek, but because
00:05:39.680 I do have to pay for a subscription for Main Street. I don't want to step on Kudo Mackey's toes
00:05:44.960 by just dumping all this data out there. But this is what the poll looks like for this day when you
00:05:51.680 remove all of the undecided voters and you add the leaning voters to the party that they're leaning
00:05:57.220 towards. We have the Conservatives at 44% and Liberals at 42%, NDP 6, Block 2, Greens 2, PPC 1,
00:06:05.620 other 1. Again, I don't really think the NDP and the Block are going to be that low, and if I'm correct,
00:06:11.080 it's going to be at the expense of the Liberals' portion of the vote. But now let's go down and
00:06:17.120 just look at some of the regionals, because this is going to tell you how the election is actually
00:06:22.060 going to shake out in real terms, because obviously this is not just a national popular vote contest,
00:06:27.680 this is a riding-by-riding battle to get into a minority government position, at least,
00:06:33.220 if not a majority, if you're lucky. This is probably not going to be an election where anyone gets a
00:06:38.560 majority. So in Atlantic Canada, we have the Liberals at 57.4% and the Conservatives at 36.6%.
00:06:46.520 This, again, is probably one of those areas of the country that are probably just a little
00:06:51.200 under-polled. We have the unweighted frequency of Atlantic Canada at 68, which means only 68 people
00:06:57.960 from Atlantic Canada responded to the poll asking who they're going to vote for, which means that that
00:07:03.040 is going to be a sample very subject to swinging. And by the way, this is how the law of big numbers
00:07:08.000 works. The more people you poll, generally, the more accurate your poll is going to be,
00:07:12.760 unless you're just micro-targeting tons and tons of people in one very specific part
00:07:16.760 of the region. So when you only poll 68%, the problem is, is that because people in urban areas
00:07:23.260 are going to be more likely to pick up the phone than others or answer the survey online especially,
00:07:29.080 that means that this is going to be a sample heavily favoring urban centers. And it's just not a
00:07:34.340 big sample at all, which means it's also a bit of a problem. It's such a small sample that other,
00:07:38.660 not even PPC, but other, got 2% of the vote. So in Atlantic Canada, and I'm not just trying to wish
00:07:45.440 cast here, I genuinely think we're going to see the Conservatives punch above 40%, and I actually kind
00:07:51.040 of doubt the Liberals are going to be at 57. I bet they're probably going to be more at below 50%,
00:07:58.080 because as unpopular as the NDP is in places like Atlantic Canada, they're more popular than 2.8%.
00:08:04.200 Now, BC. This poll actually, in fact, has the Liberals leading in BC, but again, based on other
00:08:12.200 polls I've seen, it's probably tighter, if not leaning conservative, because this poll also only
00:08:17.240 has NDP at 9.3%, when in fact, this is a province that is both good for the NDP as well as
00:08:25.220 good for the Greens. I actually think they might even have the Greens at 0% here. They have them
00:08:30.600 at 2%, and then they have the People's Party at 0.2%, and other at 1.5%. So this is another
00:08:37.720 area where I think this is a fine stat for the Conservatives, but I could imagine it being better
00:08:42.920 in real life. The real reason the Conservatives are actually really ahead in these polls is that
00:08:47.620 they're just doing massively well in the Prairies as well as Alberta. In Ontario, though, despite this
00:08:55.160 being the place where the Liberals have the most seats to be able to either win or hold
00:09:00.900 on to, it is now becoming a very close knife fight of 43.6% for the Conservatives and 45.6%
00:09:07.780 for the Liberals. Quebec, similarly tight, 44.1% in Quebec for the Liberals, 30.6% for the Conservatives,
00:09:15.840 and 16.5% for the Bloc Québécois. Now, I look at these numbers, and at the same time,
00:09:22.020 I note I don't exactly believe them because I think that Main Street, again, does have a bias
00:09:27.680 towards hardcore supporters that are heavily likely to actually answer their polls. Sometimes if you're
00:09:34.580 not exactly a Quebecer yourself, it's harder to get Quebecers to answer your polls, and a Quebec
00:09:39.300 separatist type of a person is very unlikely to take your poll if it's a company that's not Quebec-based.
00:09:47.580 And so what I think we're actually going to see, and considering that this poll is as good as it is
00:09:53.100 with some dubious points in it, I think what we are going to see is the Conservatives are actually
00:09:58.060 going to do massively well in BC, and then if they can hold the Liberals at neutral in Ontario in terms
00:10:03.840 of both parties basically end off with the same amount of seats, and then the Conservatives can
00:10:09.340 basically also hold off the Liberals in Quebec from making big gains, that means we are probably within
00:10:16.080 a minority government position for the Conservatives. Atlantic Canada, again, is one of those places I
00:10:22.020 could even see the Conservatives tying the Liberals, because based on what we've seen with Tim Houston
00:10:27.000 winning a massive election in Nova Scotia for his re-election, New Brunswick being pretty close
00:10:33.020 in the provincial election, and Newfoundland having all those fishermen protests outside of Mark Carney
00:10:39.820 events, it doesn't feel like this is a part of the country where more than half of people are just
00:10:45.680 simply going to thoughtlessly put a ballot in the ballot box. I know people who live in Nova Scotia,
00:10:51.380 I know people who live in the other maritime provinces, they are not saying that they're going
00:10:56.240 door-to-door and people are rejecting them outright. You would be able to feel going down a street that
00:11:00.940 50% of people are voting for the Liberals. They say it's a battleground where the ridings that the
00:11:06.480 Conservatives don't even currently hold are like one-third of the people saying they're voting
00:11:10.700 Conservative, which is quite good, because that doesn't mean the other two-thirds are all voting Liberal,
00:11:15.460 that means some are voting NDP, some aren't voting at all, you get my point. So what I think that we
00:11:21.720 are also going to see here in the future is that we have a lot of people who are now willing to talk
00:11:28.500 about domestic issues again. The big thing that the Liberals had going for them over the past few
00:11:34.000 weeks is everyone wanted to talk about Trump and the Americans. Once that goes away, and we already see
00:11:39.240 that going away, even in polls again, I'm not a big, I don't trust Ipsos that much, I don't think their
00:11:44.420 samples are great, but even they have showed that the U.S. and Trump has dropped from issue number
00:11:50.180 one down to issue number two and a distant issue number two. The top issue now is affordability in
00:11:55.760 the economy at 44%, and then Trump in the U.S. is down at 24. Ipsos, by the way, their previous poll
00:12:03.040 had the Conservatives losing by like 13 points. You know what their new one's at? I believe it's like
00:12:08.460 the Liberals leading by five. So it went from plus 13 to plus five. Other ones like Nanos have been
00:12:15.780 closing the gap pretty hard. Abacus, which was actually a fairly friendly Conservative pollster
00:12:20.760 for much of the election, showing them leading for a decent bit. It switched Liberal last week,
00:12:25.620 went plus six Liberal, and then the next poll was plus five, and now it's plus three. It is slowly
00:12:33.600 ratcheting back as people are actually starting to take domestic issues seriously. Now again,
00:12:39.420 time is short in this election. We have less than half of the election left to go. So what this means
00:12:46.700 to me is that Pierre Polyev needs to win the debate. It can't be neutral. It can't be they both look good,
00:12:53.540 because if people both look good, then you're going to have a lot of people defaulting to the Liberals if
00:12:57.840 they were already leaning that direction. What Polyev has to do is go to more podcasts to reach out to
00:13:03.180 youth voters who were going to stay home, and he needs to win that debate. Again, it doesn't mean
00:13:08.060 that Carney's pants have to fall off and he falls over and hits his face on the podium. It means that
00:13:12.760 he just needs to be decisively proven to have been a major contributor to the policy failures of the
00:13:19.300 Liberals over the past five years. He was the economic advisor. It should be very easy for Polyev
00:13:24.020 to hit him on that. Polyev needs to hit him on that, and like I've said in a live stream, you hit Carney
00:13:29.760 for being part of the problem, and then you give a policy solution. Hit Carney for being a part of
00:13:33.920 the problem, show that he's just like Trudeau, then hit them with the conservative policy solution.
00:13:38.700 That's what you need to do, because the narrative out of, and he has to somehow do all this with
00:13:43.720 seeming cordial, if a little bit snarky. That's okay, because the Liberal narrative is that he's a
00:13:49.640 bully like Donald Trump, and that he has no plan. So seem lighthearted while still criticizing the
00:13:55.700 Liberals, and then hit them with a detailed policy proposal that you can deliver in a few seconds
00:14:00.760 to prove people wrong. Because what people, you know, what drives votes is oftentimes is what people
00:14:07.920 can feel smug about at work. If you decisively show that Carney has no clue what he's talking about,
00:14:13.200 or he's just showing microwaved Liberal policies, then it kind of takes a lot of the fire out of
00:14:18.800 people who want to vote for the intellectual option. Carney is not the intellectual. And in the French
00:14:23.440 debate, the actual really bad thing for Carney is that he is one of five people on stage, but he is
00:14:29.140 guaranteed to be the worst person in French. The best French speaker is obviously going to be 0.99
00:14:34.540 Blanchet, followed actually by Pendalt, the Green Party leader, because he grew up in Quebec. And then
00:14:39.900 you're going to have Polyev, and then Singh, and then Carney. Although Polyev's French is so good,
00:14:44.720 I really don't think people are going to see a difference with him and the Bloc leader and the Green 0.99
00:14:49.520 Party leader. Singh is in the great position of actually being a better French speaker than
00:14:55.700 Mark Carney. Usually, Singh is easily the worst. And in this election, he's actually going to be
00:15:01.100 decent on the debate stage. If I'm Mark Carney, I'm trying to find an excuse to get off that French 1.00
00:15:06.460 debate stage. Because right now, like what we're seeing in this poll, and again, I think this is
00:15:11.560 heavily overstating the Liberals in Quebec, if they were at 44%, if they drop below like 38,
00:15:18.380 they're in trouble. Now they are only winning Montreal again, and maybe a couple other ridings
00:15:22.840 outside of Montreal, and that's it. In reality, I think they're probably already only at about 39%,
00:15:28.420 40%. And the Bloc is probably more like 20, if not 25. If I actually think the Conservatives aren't
00:15:34.740 probably going to do as well as 30, they'll probably do about 25 in Quebec. But if the Bloc actually surges
00:15:40.400 because of Carney's bad French, you are going to see a very, very quick evaporation in the
00:15:48.360 ability for the Liberals to win, because they need to dominate Quebec, and then they need to win
00:15:52.820 like, well over half the seats in Ontario. And if that doesn't happen, they are out of the ballgame.
00:15:58.440 Anyways, so that should be it for me in this video, guys. Just a quick polling update, although I always
00:16:04.260 go on for a long time, so it probably doesn't feel that quick. Conservatives are doing well, pretty much
00:16:08.780 all the polls are showing them gaining momentum again, even if they were just trash pollsters. I tend to put 0.98
00:16:14.160 pollsters in three categories. There are conservative-friendly pollsters on average,
00:16:18.620 which are, I would say, Kolsovsky, Abacus, and Innovation, or Innovative. Doesn't mean they always
00:16:25.120 show the Conservatives leading, but they tend to have good samples for picking up on Conservative
00:16:29.100 voters out there. There are the people who are not kind to the Conservatives. That would be the
00:16:33.480 Main Streets. That would be Leger, Liaison, Research Co., Polera. And then there are the gutter trash
00:16:40.520 pollsters, in my opinion, which are Ecos and Angus Reid. Do not listen to them. Their poll 0.99
00:16:45.860 samples make no sense. If anyone says that somebody is leading in this election by more than eight
00:16:50.980 points, they're lying because, no, they're not. This is a knife-fight election, and make sure you
00:16:56.780 go out and vote early, because I want those voter lines on election day. Do not scare away those less
00:17:02.380 likely to vote people who think they'll stand in line to vote Conservative for 30 minutes,
00:17:07.560 but as soon as it gets to 45 or 50 minutes, they're out. So make sure if you're definitely
00:17:12.080 voting Conservative, please vote early. So anyways, that's it for me today, guys. I'm traveling to
00:17:17.820 Ottawa, probably when you're watching this video, to go help out in the Nepean riding and to try and
00:17:23.260 defeat Mark Carney in that riding that he's running in. So if you live in the area, you might want to
00:17:28.200 help out Barbara Ball or go to Kanata. These are winnable ridings in the Ottawa area that are usually
00:17:34.060 not on the table for the Conservatives at all. So I want to make sure I get out there, actually hit
00:17:38.600 doors, put my money where my mouth is, because I don't want to just tell you guys to volunteer.
00:17:42.520 I'm going to volunteer as well. So anyways, see you guys later.