The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - January 25, 2025


David Eby has already blown its 2nd term (ft. Ryan Painter)


Episode Stats

Length

53 minutes

Words per Minute

189.7804

Word Count

10,226

Sentence Count

580

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

In this episode of The Wyatt Claypool Show, my friend Ryan Painter joins me to talk about BC election irregularities, and why the government is trying to get a new election thrown out of the ballot box in order to nullify the previous election.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, everyone. Welcome back to the Wyatt Claypool Show. Usually, provincial politics
00:00:06.700 and federal politics calms down after an election. You know, people realize they're going to
00:00:12.100 have to live with the government for four years. That government slowly gets back to
00:00:16.440 work, and you don't really hear that much kind of explosive, controversial stuff happening
00:00:21.340 at least for several months when the government starts getting sort of the gears of legislation
00:00:27.600 going again. But that is not the case in British Columbia. Everything is a complete disaster
00:00:33.800 already after the last BC provincial election in October, and some of that disaster has to do with
00:00:39.980 the last election. And to talk about it with me today and try and make some of what's going on
00:00:45.880 make a little bit more sense is my friend Ryan Painter, who has a lot of in-house political
00:00:53.340 experience, out-of-house political experience. You've been following it for a very long time.
00:00:57.600 How's it going, Ryan?
00:00:58.780 It's going great. Thanks so much for having me here, Wyatt. I'm enjoying a nice,
00:01:04.420 mostly restful Sunday here in just outside of the capital in View Royal. Most people don't know
00:01:10.140 where that is, so I just say Victoria.
00:01:12.180 Yeah, it's somewhere on the island. I only know that there is BC, there's Vancouver,
00:01:16.300 there's things outside of Vancouver, and then there's things on the island, and then there's
00:01:20.520 Victoria. But yeah, yeah, so I would recommend everyone go and check out Ryan Painter's sub
00:01:27.980 stack. I will be linking that in the description below because he does do some good detailed
00:01:33.040 coverage of stuff that happens in BC politics and other interesting conversations with people
00:01:37.920 I know and people I don't know. But let's start with what I think is going to flavor the entire
00:01:44.300 conversation, which is the Surrey-Guilford sort of election irregularities controversy that's going
00:01:52.600 on. Because I didn't know this until right before the show, but you actually have some insight into
00:01:58.160 what the controversy is on the ground. It's a rioting where the BC NDP only got Gary Begg re-elected
00:02:04.520 by 22 votes. The BC Conservative candidate, Hanvir Endawa, has brought a lawsuit to the courts
00:02:10.480 in order to basically nullify this election and hold a new by-election because of irregularities
00:02:16.340 found. And you can give me some details on what you have seen with that, because I think this is
00:02:21.860 important to sort of contextualize the behavior of why it seems like EB and the BC NDP are so
00:02:28.320 aggressive right now. They really do not want a new by-election happening.
00:02:35.520 Yeah, you know, it was interesting because I was involved in the election, as I know you were.
00:02:42.480 I was working up north and you were doing all kinds of stuff down on the lower mainland. And,
00:02:47.540 you know, there were concerns about ballot boxes and various different things like that going on.
00:02:54.560 And I tend to be very, I guess, slow to look at things. Like, I'm very analytical. I try not to
00:03:04.180 get too excited about stuff because when it comes to elections, I know people are people. Sometimes
00:03:09.280 mistakes are made. It doesn't mean that there's corruption. It doesn't mean that there's problems
00:03:12.920 or issues all the time. So I try to take a very methodical approach to concerns around elections,
00:03:18.880 not least of which is it's become so de rigueur to call people election deniers that I would just
00:03:24.780 like to stay away from that moniker as much as possible. But what happened here in Surrey-Guilford
00:03:31.120 was just so seemingly crazy that it just had to be pursued. So what you had was a care home for
00:03:42.460 addictions and mental illness in Surrey-Guilford, a place called Argyle Lodge. And essentially it
00:03:51.640 turned out that there were 21 people who voted in this one place. And why that's weird is they had
00:04:00.100 21 mail-in ballots apparently sent to this place without anybody asking for them. And so anyone who
00:04:06.760 knows, and I don't expect most of your listeners to know the Elections Act inside and out,
00:04:11.980 but in order to get a mail-in ballot, you have to ask for one. It won't be sent to you otherwise.
00:04:18.880 And what we found was that, no, in fact, these 21 ballots had arrived, had been there,
00:04:25.480 that folks had filled them out and sent them in when the actual polling station was maybe
00:04:31.680 500 yards or something across the street. Like it was just across the street.
00:04:37.220 It was like Argyle Lodge, the sidewalk, the road, the other sidewalk, and then the walk up to the
00:04:42.820 school where the polling station was. Exactly. The polling station was right there. Now,
00:04:47.820 you know, we don't know where the doors were for the polling station, but at the end of the day,
00:04:51.040 that doesn't really matter. The polling location wasn't so far away from Argyle Lodge that it made
00:04:58.000 sense that some, for some reason, 21 mail-in ballots were there. Now let's put that whole
00:05:04.060 piece aside because I actually think what is more important is that we've now had the manager of the
00:05:09.360 Argyle Lodge say in public, well, for 30 years, we've been getting mail-in ballots delivered to us
00:05:15.400 in bulk from the commission. She says the commission, she means Elections BC and ostensibly Elections
00:05:20.400 Canada. But Elections BC has come out and refuted that and said, we don't do that. We don't deliver
00:05:26.880 mail-in ballots in bulk to anybody. Individuals have to ask for them. And another side of this is
00:05:33.520 only one person can vouch for another person if you're voting. So, I mean, there's all kinds of
00:05:37.840 things mixed up in this, right? The concern is how did all of these ballots get here? Who orchestrated
00:05:45.160 all of this? And sworn affidavits were also brought forward where people said that they were coerced
00:05:51.660 into filling out these ballots. They didn't know who they were voting for. They felt that they might
00:05:56.440 get kicked out of the lodge if they didn't vote a certain way. Lots of concerns around just being
00:06:02.080 forced to vote in a certain way, right? Because it's a recovery lodge, it's not like, oh, well,
00:06:07.560 I got kicked out. I'm standing up to this unprincipled manager and I'm going to go get a new place to rent.
00:06:12.760 It's like, this might be literally the only place that would actually let you in because
00:06:16.920 you've had to recover from addictions. You have maybe mental illness sort of issues because of
00:06:22.560 that. And so, like, you're a textbook vulnerable person. And you're right. The thing, too, about the
00:06:29.300 polling location being so close is I actually, at first, when I heard the story, assumed it was like
00:06:33.580 a long-term care home for people in their 80s who have mobility issues. Like, no mobility issues that I
00:06:39.540 know of. But one thing that was problematic that I heard, and this was part of the affidavits,
00:06:46.260 was that there were issues, or it wasn't part of an affidavit, it was technically just eyewitness
00:06:50.060 because this person wouldn't have been able to sign an affidavit, that there were several nonverbal
00:06:54.140 people who would have not been able to articulate a voting preference or would have not been able to
00:07:00.840 have, or would have not had the capacity to have engaged in the election in any way someone would
00:07:05.600 actually see as legitimate. And so, when the manager came out, and you, I'm not sure if you
00:07:11.100 know this part, did you hear that she said, well, I spoiled my ballot in this election?
00:07:15.720 No, I didn't hear that. That's a new wrinkle that I haven't heard. And I don't think this is the last
00:07:20.560 we've heard from her either, I have to say. I think we're going to hear more from her in the next couple
00:07:23.800 weeks. My thing is, like, that's a really cute lie in the sense that, yeah, really, are you one of
00:07:29.200 three people who intentionally spoiled their ballots in this riding for the election? Because obviously,
00:07:34.580 she's not going to say, oh, I voted conservative, well, don't bark up this tree, because her
00:07:38.560 donation record of $1,400, a maxed out donation to the BC NDP in 2023, makes it so that she can't
00:07:46.580 say, well, I voted conservative. And so, if she votes NDP, that's, like, obviously a problem if
00:07:51.800 she's filling out other people's ballots and donating to them. So, no, no, no, I spoiled my ballot.
00:07:56.040 It's another ripple. It's another ripple that just raises more questions than answers. So,
00:08:00.360 what Hanveer is doing is he's pursuing an independent review of this in court. He submitted
00:08:09.200 the filings that is, you know, essentially moving forward. We don't have any more news
00:08:13.580 on that. But the party itself has also called for police investigation. Now, given all this
00:08:19.720 new news that we have about all these ballots that apparently arrived, the concerns from folks
00:08:25.420 around, you know, kind of harvesting, forcing, coercing, there's a lot of concerns about what's
00:08:32.500 happened at this lodge, given the public statements from Baljeet Kandola, who is the manager of the
00:08:38.360 lodge, a lot of her public statements run contrary to the public statements of elections BC. And,
00:08:45.180 and, you know, our elections and our kind of democratic rights, they require this investigation.
00:08:51.360 But the province, the province in terms of, you know, saying we need an independent investigation,
00:08:55.620 which is what conservatives are certainly calling for. The province has said, no, we're going to do
00:09:00.200 an all party committee. We're going to have everybody sit down and talk this out. And the
00:09:04.180 conservatives are saying, no, we need to take this out of the politicians' hands and make this an
00:09:08.040 independent inquiry. But the all party committee that's being run by someone from the BCNDP.
00:09:13.400 Of course, of course, the chair will be an NDPer. And the vice chair will probably be an NDPer as
00:09:18.140 well. And they'll probably have one or two, you know, conservatives and maybe one green and that'll
00:09:23.920 be it. Right. So if we, if we come into the ballpark of some interesting questions that need
00:09:28.960 to be asked, I will assume that they will not let that go forward.
00:09:33.000 Yeah, the committees, committees are great because I mean, they, they, they're places where conversations
00:09:38.160 can happen. You can tease out some issues, but they're not, in my opinion, places where you get
00:09:41.960 good investigative work done. Yeah, definitely. So the, the thing that's so funny about this
00:09:48.060 was that David Eby himself was the man in November when we had a lot of these more, you know,
00:09:55.400 headline catching issues in the election come up, they weren't really affecting any important
00:10:00.560 ridings. It was like a ballot box was found in a riding that wasn't counted that the conservatives
00:10:06.200 won by like 5,000 votes. And it had McKenzie. Yep. Yeah. It only had a few hundred and like
00:10:11.680 500, 800 votes in it. That's a lot of votes, not in that riding in terms of the margin of victory,
00:10:16.840 but that's when Eby felt comfortable to come out and say, yeah, we need, you know, a commission to
00:10:21.360 look into this. The, uh, BC elections needs its procedures tightened up. We'll look into what we
00:10:26.240 can do. But then when Rustad and Hanvir come out and say, well, Hey, look, Surrey Guilford,
00:10:32.340 where your buddy only lost by, or only only won by 22 votes has at least 45 irregularities that
00:10:38.760 we've been able to find on our own without any data that was useful to us from elections, BC,
00:10:44.940 maybe we should look into this. And then David Eby pivots into, well, you're a bunch of election
00:10:49.400 deniers, sore losers, all this stuff. And why he's this concerned about the election is because
00:10:55.800 if a by-election was held, I guarantee he loses and he knows that he loses because so far it wasn't
00:11:02.840 even like a second, almost in terms of political time. It wasn't even like a second after the
00:11:07.800 election that things started popping loose and BC and DP promises did not come to fruition.
00:11:12.740 Like a week after the election, wasn't it that like, like 50% of ERs in the province,
00:11:19.360 like a month or so after had already had closure issues. The $1,000 grocery checks, the BC and DP had
00:11:26.920 promised during the campaign suddenly cannot be paid for anymore because the government's about to run a
00:11:32.740 record deficit aside from all those new spending promises, because the revenues, the tax revenues
00:11:38.940 from 2024 were not what they expected them to be. It came in way lower than expected. Who could have
00:11:45.380 seen that coming considering the fact that they have been basically killing private sector jobs all year
00:11:52.200 long? Every time they posted, oh, well, we added 11,000 new jobs this month, you would look at it and
00:11:57.620 they added like 20,000 public sector jobs. They lost 9,000 private sector jobs.
00:12:03.820 They, on this piece, on this jobs piece though, like the BC is leading nationally in the number
00:12:09.540 of public sector jobs, uh, compared to private sector. It's like six to seven public sector jobs
00:12:14.760 to one private sector job. And I think in actually in the most recent jobs report survey that I looked
00:12:19.600 at, I think BC lost some, uh, I'm going to get the number. It was 6,500 or so. Yeah, it was like 6,500
00:12:25.860 jobs that like private sector jobs that were lost in BC. Which pay for public sector positions. I never
00:12:32.340 get when people don't understand this. There are great public sector positions we need filled that
00:12:37.120 are very, uh, productive for the province. You know, the police, firefighters, nurses, doctors, all those
00:12:43.280 sort of things, people who work in government offices that are actually doing good work. But the thing is,
00:12:48.220 every time a new person's added, there isn't like a paper that comes out justifying why we needed,
00:12:53.420 you know, 2,000 more people in this department and why this department needed, uh, 50 new office
00:12:58.940 workers. It's just kind of taken as a net good that a bunch of people were hired to do stuff.
00:13:06.100 And, and in all of that, you've got the, the, which the irony of all of this is you have the
00:13:10.660 collapse and bankruptcy of small business BC, which was an organization, uh, essentially, uh,
00:13:17.480 created through provincial and federal mandate to support small businesses and who sat on the
00:13:23.960 board of small business BC, but a direct line to the minister of jobs. Uh, I think it was the deputy
00:13:31.160 minister or something who sat there and all of a sudden, uh, and it came so fast after the election,
00:13:36.680 just suddenly it's gone bankrupt. It had gotten an infusion of cash from the feds just before.
00:13:42.200 And now not only has it gone bankrupt, uh, there's concerns about whether or not people have been
00:13:46.920 fully paid out for what they're earned. There's concerns that there's actually going to be more
00:13:50.600 money that BC is going to have to pay out because they're bankrupt and they actually owe creditors.
00:13:55.880 Like it's a huge problem that we have not seen the last of yet.
00:13:59.880 Sounds like the BC United of government institutions.
00:14:04.520 But like, and that, and that's, and that's so pathetic because they probably knew it was going
00:14:09.560 bankrupt probably months ago, but it just got enough cash that they knew it would take them past
00:14:14.840 October 19th. And that is blatant corruption in a lot of ways when you're running the government,
00:14:21.080 not for the actual purposes you're meant to achieve, not because small business, uh,
00:14:26.280 BC is supposed to support small businesses. It is basically just trying to exist for six months
00:14:31.640 to take them past the election. A lot of this stuff, just like the, the water treatment plant
00:14:38.520 on the North shore project. And that this is literally probably in terms of a macro project,
00:14:46.120 no doubt there's been some small government contract for like $500 that ended up costing
00:14:50.200 10,000. And it's like crazy, the overrun, but for like a macro infrastructure project,
00:14:55.720 I don't think there has been a bigger cost overrun in Canadian history without like a justifiable,
00:15:02.040 like environmental crisis that happened, like an earthquake set work back. This is just mismanagement.
00:15:08.520 The BC North shore water treatment plant was supposed to cost $700 million,
00:15:14.680 dollars, which is an absolutely realistic amount of money to spend on something like this.
00:15:19.800 Unveil to the audience, how much this is costing now while I take a sip of coffee out of grief.
00:15:25.160 So I I'm, I'm, I'm not going to get the number right, but I think we're somewhere now at five,
00:15:30.840 six billion, somewhere around there. My number may be off, but I've heard it is at least 4 billion now,
00:15:35.720 but it's not even complete. So I think your five to 6 billion is what they're now projecting.
00:15:39.640 I think five to 6 billion is the projection of where we're going to wind up when, when it's all done.
00:15:43.800 And, and look, I wouldn't be surprised if it, if, if it went higher, I mean, here's the thing,
00:15:48.520 why it everything costs more now, right? Everything costs more. Interests are up, uh,
00:15:52.840 carpenters, uh, contractors, construction workers, materials, everything costs more.
00:15:57.240 Now, if, if it was just an increase that, as you say, you could justify based on labor and materials,
00:16:03.240 totally fine. But the problem here had nothing to do with that. It was everything to do with
00:16:08.760 mismanagement from Metro and between axiona, the company that was hired to do this work.
00:16:14.920 And my understanding, and this is going to blow your socks off. My understanding is that there
00:16:20.200 may be a settlement between the two and they may be looking to sign NDAs. And if that happens,
00:16:26.440 oh my gosh, are we the public in trouble? Because we won't be able to get the information we need about
00:16:32.440 what, what happened in all of this. I mean, we have little bits and pieces of information and
00:16:37.880 some material was purchased that wasn't quite right. And they had to go, it's almost like a,
00:16:42.680 a blue bridge scenario for anyone from Victoria who understands the issue of Chinese steel that was
00:16:48.200 brought in to remake the Johnson street bridge. And it sounds like there were some issues there with,
00:16:51.880 with this, but if they sign NDAs, they can hide behind that. And we don't get any information.
00:16:57.560 So we need a full public inquiry and an audit from the inspector general of municipalities
00:17:02.280 to really get to the bottom of this and understand what went wrong and who screwed up because it's a
00:17:07.720 lot of money. And I have no doubt that when, when this kind of like truly hits the fan in the public,
00:17:14.760 that you're going to have NDP politicians and supporters, influencers blaming the private
00:17:21.000 businesses that were involved, the private contractors involved when it's public policy,
00:17:25.880 which is incentivizing the misuse of funds. Because right now in the current rules,
00:17:31.240 let's just go down to the ground level of road construction, road repairs.
00:17:35.960 They, the government, when they pay people for, you know, for like a provincial highway or a federal
00:17:42.520 highway that the province is managing or some municipality right now in BC, they will give you
00:17:47.800 an allowance for overruns of overruns that are acceptable. You never give a company and say,
00:17:54.040 you know what, this job to do this many kilometers of the road, we're paying you guys $200,000 over
00:18:01.080 the next three or four months. But you can go over time by about three or four extra months,
00:18:06.520 and you can actually charge up to 500,000. Who in their right mind is going to get the job done fast
00:18:12.440 and efficient, even if you were a bonus for getting it done fast and efficiently, when you can be lazy,
00:18:18.360 get nothing done and get paid more for it. And there, there really has to be. And look,
00:18:23.240 I'm not anti union. That's something I want to make it really clear. I've been in a union. I've
00:18:27.240 been a union organizer. I really respect the work that unions do. But I think the community benefits
00:18:32.360 agreement that the NDP have put out there, which really, I think, have racked up costs at a time when
00:18:38.440 costs are already flying up like crazy has to be reviewed. I mean, at the end of the day,
00:18:43.640 there is one taxpayer, and we have to respect taxpayer dollars. And look, I run a nonprofit
00:18:50.520 here in in Victoria. I'm also part of another international nonprofit that does work. And we
00:18:56.040 have a line that I'm the director of development for the international one. And I have a line that
00:19:00.920 I always use donor dollars, we must respect our donor dollars. And that's my mindset, because that
00:19:07.000 money is precious, we get it, and we have to respect it. But yet, because taxpayer money is
00:19:13.240 somehow infinite, it doesn't need to be respected with a given the due consideration and care that
00:19:19.480 it should. So I think on that piece, we need to do a lot of work. And I don't know if you saw
00:19:24.040 last week, the Metro Vancouver mayors that are making more than the president of the United States,
00:19:28.360 in some cases, like, I was like, Oh, my gosh, who's like $400,000 for them? The the what was it?
00:19:35.720 Um, was it Ian Brody? It was Delta. Yeah, this Delta's mayor need $400,000.
00:19:42.760 Delta is barely a real municipality. All these places are just subsections of Vancouver,
00:19:47.880 they can basically take whatever Vancouver is doing, although I wouldn't advise it,
00:19:51.480 and just copy and paste it into their area. Did you hear Mike Hurley, the mayor of Burnaby,
00:19:56.200 actually say he deserved it? Like, yeah, I think I deserve it. I do a lot of work and and I'm up late,
00:20:01.320 and I'm having a lot of meetings. And it's just like, I'd hope that Brad West, who is also taking
00:20:06.920 a lot to be the mayor of Port, Port Coquitlam, that he'd maybe advocate for a slashing of his own
00:20:13.160 salary, because I feel like if you want to be a new fiscal conservative kind of champion in the
00:20:17.560 province, that should be looked at as like, you know, money where your mouth is take a small
00:20:22.520 sacrifice here. I'm not saying, you know, slash your salary by 50%. But a lot of this stuff is like,
00:20:28.360 well, no doubt this guy's doing a good job running the city, we're paying him a mountain.
00:20:33.400 Well, you know, I like Brad and and, you know, I know.
00:20:36.200 That's what I'm saying for his brand.
00:20:38.360 I'd say, you know, but that's the thing. I mean, the brand, it doesn't look good. I mean,
00:20:43.720 look, whether what you can't say that you're a fiscal conservative and then suddenly have a whole
00:20:49.800 bunch of money tied to you, it creates an optics problem. And so for anybody trying to be a fiscal
00:20:56.760 conservative, just be watchful of how much taxpayer money you're spending. And if like, if it's if
00:21:04.120 it's beyond what you think is reasonable, then, you know, slash it, donate it to something, you know,
00:21:10.600 do something else with it. I don't actually, I wouldn't even mind if they started tradition with
00:21:14.680 some of these mayors, don't take a pay cut. But every year you donate 20%, 15% of your salary to
00:21:21.240 an organization or I'm donating 15% of my salary this year to refurbish park benches.
00:21:26.600 Perfect. Absolutely. Local food bank, because Lord knows that food banks usage has skyrocketed more
00:21:31.880 than anything else I've seen here in a long time. There there's a community up near where I live
00:21:36.760 called Sydney by the sea or Sydney. Lots of people know it. You come through it when you take the ferry
00:21:41.160 here. I understand that food, it has a high, high density of seniors that live up there. Food bank
00:21:47.400 usage has increased over 100%. This is one of the wealthiest municipalities on the island. And yet food
00:21:54.200 bank usage by seniors up there has increased tremendously. And that was shocking. I heard this
00:22:01.160 a couple weeks ago. And it's because it used to be an affordable place to live. Probably these people
00:22:06.040 probably did well in their careers. But you banked a certain amount of money per year after you retired
00:22:12.680 that you assumed that you needed to live on. And when you thought you were going to have to pay
00:22:16.680 15,000 a year, because you already own your home, you already have all this other stuff,
00:22:20.600 you only have to pay 15,000 a year to sustain yourself. And your costs are going up to $23,000
00:22:25.960 a year that you have to pay in your municipal property taxes keep going up eventually doesn't
00:22:30.440 work. But you mentioned the fairies just now. And I think that's something else we have to talk about
00:22:35.480 because this is a yet another failure of the government that rolled out like right after the
00:22:40.760 election, to the point where people couldn't get from Vancouver to Vancouver Island for Christmas.
00:22:47.080 Yeah, yeah. I mean, the fairies stoppages
00:22:50.040 World War Two, and we're trying to get soldiers back to base camp so they can celebrate
00:22:53.960 Christmas away from the front lines. We're just trying to get people in their SUVs from one location
00:22:59.480 to another. And they're SUVs or walk-ons or if you're like me for the first year and a half that
00:23:05.160 I lived here bussing over because my wife went to Caplano University at the time. Look, the BC
00:23:12.440 ferries are called the island's highway system. And I really do believe that they are an excellent
00:23:16.760 innovation from Wacky Bennett, WAC Bennett to bring in the ferry system that can connect the mainland and
00:23:24.280 connect the island. And they have been largely, I think, successful, well-managed. That's another
00:23:31.720 issue. I mean, it is a crown corporation. Maybe it needs to be brought back under BC control. Maybe it
00:23:36.120 needs to be made a completely private entity. I don't know. I'm not that much into kind of the
00:23:41.480 mechanics of it. But I tell you what, ferries breaking down, two or three ferries breaking down
00:23:46.360 every week or every two weeks, stranding people on either side of the ocean is not what it was meant to be.
00:23:52.520 It was meant to be something that could continuously run. And heaven forbid, you need to actually get
00:23:58.680 to the island and you're into Wasson and a ferry breaks down and you have to jet to Horseshoe Bay
00:24:03.640 just to hope you can get something or fly out. It's really terrible that the ferries are having
00:24:10.760 this much of a problem for a community that depends on them. And this is exactly what happened,
00:24:15.960 except it was centuries ago. So it's embarrassing now. But two centuries ago in the 1820s,
00:24:23.560 there was a problem with the ferry system between New Jersey and New York. And it was because the
00:24:31.400 government had basically lent a monopoly to a company that did not require itself to do a good
00:24:39.240 job in order to keep getting its subsidies. And they even had like clauses that prevented competition
00:24:45.880 from getting into the game with them. And it was actually Cornelius Vanderbilt who had to create an
00:24:50.920 illegal ferry system that could get people across the water in half the time for like half the money
00:24:57.000 that eventually ended up running the state monopoly out of business. And right now we just the problem in
00:25:03.000 our modern day is that you could not just start up your own random ferry somewhere and get it going.
00:25:08.920 You got to be connected to public roads. You got to be from a public port point. And if you're you
00:25:14.760 start up your own, it's not going to work. But we have to just accept that, oh, well, it's a public
00:25:19.800 service. So we can't have it be like, you know, a competition or whatever. It's like, well, it costs,
00:25:25.480 it costs like half of a minimum wage worker salary to cross the river if you needed to do that sort of
00:25:31.000 thing. To get a car across, it's like an entire day's wage and a half.
00:25:35.880 Yeah. Well, you're not wrong. And they have I mean, they are there. There have been some
00:25:39.880 introductions of some small private sector stuff like you've got Hello and Nanaimo and that's just
00:25:44.040 a walk on. You know, they had the V2V in Victoria that lasted all of a year because it was too expensive.
00:25:52.680 It just couldn't you can't make it work. So and this kind of stuff always brings up conversations
00:25:56.760 around a permanent road to the island. And again, I'm not an engineer. I don't know any
00:26:03.240 feasibility of any of that stuff. But look, like whatever we need to do to keep the ferries running
00:26:08.200 on time, to keep the trains running on time, people here on the island and and back and forth,
00:26:13.480 because there are people here who go to Vancouver for cancer treatment or go to Vancouver or if you
00:26:17.400 can't get cancer treatment in BC anymore, you go to the States. But you have you need access to this
00:26:22.760 stuff. So breaking down is just not an option. Yeah, it's like honest. I've been a long time
00:26:28.760 advocate, actually, even though I'm a fiscal conservative. They should just pool airport fees
00:26:35.240 in general tax pools rather than having it be on ticket prices, because if you haven't checked
00:26:40.600 recently, your ticket cost on an airline these days is like one third of it is just government taxes
00:26:47.080 and airport fees and all this other stuff and airport fees that don't even make sense. Why do I need
00:26:51.080 to pay 25 bucks for the Vancouver airport every time I land for improvement fees? It has nothing
00:26:56.040 to do with that must be that improvement fee cost. Security, even though security checks require
00:27:03.400 fewer people and less time than ever. So somehow I owe them $8 after I stand in line for a few minutes
00:27:09.320 and walk through to get your bags probably late. You had to pay another $7. You get nickel and dimed.
00:27:16.280 And I am I'm always the person having to stand up for the honor of the airlines,
00:27:19.960 because like, it's really not their fault. It's not their fault that they suck. They have to suck
00:27:24.600 to make money because when all went out, there's so many fees, there's extra fuel taxes they have to
00:27:29.880 pay. They have to pay, you know, like they have to pay usage fees in order to get access to terminals
00:27:35.880 and all this stuff, which makes sense. But it's also bloated. Obviously, you're going to have to add
00:27:40.760 three or four more rows in the plane that probably shouldn't be there. Everyone could have way more leg
00:27:44.920 room if it wasn't for government regulations and taxes. And so if you're going to give basically
00:27:51.080 public corporations the monopoly over an airport, at least make it all publicly funded rather than
00:27:57.400 user fees from people who, in theory, are bringing business to other parts of Canada.
00:28:03.640 You're totally right. And and just just on the point around around fees and around taxes, I mean,
00:28:09.560 we are paying so much these days, whether it's through carbon taxes or the myriad of other 30
00:28:14.280 some odd taxes that the NDP government introduced. And yet, in their most recent fiscal update in
00:28:20.360 December, the NDP reported a nine point four billion dollar deficit, which is just it's wild when you
00:28:28.680 think just just over two years before that date, the late John Horgan left David EB with a six billion
00:28:36.040 dollar surplus. So that means in two years, David EB went from a six billion dollar surplus to almost
00:28:43.880 10 billion dollars in deficit. And now we're the ones we're going to have to probably deal with
00:28:50.200 program cutbacks, housing program cuts, all other kinds of cuts that we already know this,
00:28:55.640 this rebate that we were supposed to be getting a central economic pillar of EB's 2024 election
00:29:01.720 campaign. That's not coming, y'all like I know, like they're talking about shelving and it might
00:29:05.880 come. It's not coming like it's gone. It will not come because they can't. It's just if whether it's
00:29:11.640 10 or 15 percent that Trump brings into the tariffs, the NDP are going to lean on any excuse they can to
00:29:17.560 try to save some money because we're in serious trouble debt wise. And that's that's also the thing I
00:29:23.160 want to get to. David EB is exploiting the issue of Trump to pretend that, well, you know, it's not
00:29:30.520 actually my fault. B.C.'s economically weak. It's the Trump tariffs that are only theoretical at this
00:29:36.040 point that haven't even come in yet. That's why I suck at my job. I like the whole Team Canada thing
00:29:42.440 feels like a psyop in terms of like a literal psychological operation to try and make Polyev and
00:29:48.120 Daniel Smith and other conservative premiers like Scott Moe to join with these bloated other provincial
00:29:54.760 governments and the federal government. And let's let's have a strong, you know, stance against Trump
00:30:00.120 and the Americans. It's like you guys actually need to be doing your jobs first. Maybe it would be
00:30:04.760 good if this whole Team Canada that half the team wasn't smoking and overweight. You know, I mean, for
00:30:10.760 for like a for a sports metaphor here, maybe if we're going to actually face them down, you guys need to
00:30:15.880 cut your wasteful spending. You need to cut your over taxation. It's crazy. And the funniest thing
00:30:22.840 is Bill Vanderzam throughout all of this was actually vindicated because without his campaign
00:30:29.640 to stop the HST, David EB would be even more screwed than he already is because he didn't have to forego
00:30:36.760 the provincial sales tax between December and February.
00:30:40.520 So shot. Not only a shout out to to Vanderzam, but Bill Thielman, a long time NDP insider and
00:30:47.880 campaigner who was also a lead charge of the anti-HST campaign. I remember working on that campaign
00:30:54.040 back in Vernon when Adrian Dix was still the leader and Vernon ended up approving it by only about 51%.
00:31:01.160 That was that was interesting. You're right, Wyatt. And, you know, it's interesting to look at all of
00:31:07.960 this. Look at how much money the NDP has absolutely shoved down the toilet and then look at how they
00:31:15.560 gave every single MLA a cabinet level position or a minister of state position or a parliamentary
00:31:21.160 secretary position, some kind of position that gave them a raise. And if you look at the ordering
00:31:27.080 councils that are coming out and I check these every day when when when I'm when I'm at work,
00:31:32.200 because I want to see where our money is going in these ordering council.
00:31:35.000 You should start sending me the funniest ones you find.
00:31:37.480 Oh, man. Some of the stuff that that people are like the how many chiefs of staff does Ravi Callon
00:31:43.400 have? Like, I think in all total, I think he's got like eight or nine staff and they're making over
00:31:48.840 a million bucks like in all of that staff. You need you have you need staff members to run around
00:31:53.720 managing all of his building projects. It's true. You have Matt Smith, who was David Eby's
00:31:59.800 chief of staff, who only worked for two years and got a two hundred and seventy thousand dollar
00:32:04.200 severance when he left. That's just his severance. I think in total he got like eight hundred thousand
00:32:09.480 dollars for two years. Yeah, because the severance was half the salary over a certain period of time.
00:32:13.880 So his salary was double that half a million a year to do to make trouble, basically. And the funny
00:32:20.840 thing is he has a bigger cabinet because everyone got a he's the Oprah Winfrey. It's the Oprah Winfrey.
00:32:26.440 You get a raise. You get a raise. Everybody gets a raise. Every useless random MLA.
00:32:32.200 Anyone who could fog Amir in the party got a got a got a new higher position. Some of the lowest end
00:32:39.080 promotions only get them like a parliamentary secretary bump of twelve thousand. But some of the other
00:32:43.960 cabinet minister positions are getting them eighty four thousand more a year or a hundred thousand for
00:32:48.840 certain positions. The cabinet literally costs four hundred thousand dollars more than Horgan's
00:32:55.640 cabinet cost, even though he had a far bigger caucus where you could have argued that, you know,
00:33:00.920 this guy's just he has a Ph.D. in, you know, mathematics. I really want him to be in this
00:33:06.040 position, even though I already have a finance minister. No, he has less talent because a lot of
00:33:10.440 the talent left before the election. A lot of these people are just in these roles. So with the B
00:33:16.680 squad, the B squad, for some reason, justified even more positions and the four hundred thousand
00:33:22.760 dollar cabinet price increase, that's only the MLA extra cost that has nothing to do with what you're
00:33:28.680 saying. Yeah. Everyone has a bunch of new staffers they get to employ because you're not just the
00:33:33.960 parliamentary secretary. You're now an important person who now needs three other interns and you
00:33:39.240 need a you need a chief of staff. You need an EA or maybe you need two EAs and maybe you need a
00:33:43.720 co-chief of staff and maybe you need a director of communications. Maybe you need several administrative
00:33:48.040 assistants. Maybe you need a special advisor. Yeah. I mean, there are special advisors listed
00:33:53.320 in some of these roles, which I'm just like, what are you special advising on and why, why, why do these
00:34:00.360 cabinet ministers need special advisors when they have government bureaucracies that are set up and
00:34:06.680 designed to give them the best information possible? Like I've worked in the bureaucracy
00:34:11.640 here in BC for a few years. I know how expert some of these bureaucrats really are. These are people
00:34:17.480 who spend a lot of time looking and thinking about problems and trying to fix them and to not lean on
00:34:24.680 them is ridiculous. I took a master's degree in public policy. So I know that even some of these
00:34:29.480 people in these very technical policy jobs are actually genuinely worth it. They actually genuinely
00:34:35.160 know how to take your big piece of legislation, break it down to its component parts and knows
00:34:39.480 how to hand each part off to its right department so they can make the changes they need. There are
00:34:44.120 some good people in there, but it feels like with so many people in government, it's like watching that
00:34:50.280 rich kid who never had his parents really teach him the value of money going out and being given a
00:34:56.840 million dollars. And you wonder how they end up blowing it all in like two years because they go on
00:35:02.120 vacation and they spend like $45,000 on a vacation. And that's what the NDP feels like. It's like
00:35:07.560 watching people who have never learned the value of money. The thing that always drove me up the
00:35:12.680 wall as something you think the government would, even if they don't want to admit that there's
00:35:17.560 problems, you think they would silently do this in the background because it's such an easy solution
00:35:21.240 to reduce wait times and ER closures in BC healthcare. 40% of people who are in HR and administration
00:35:29.480 and management in the healthcare system, some of them should be in those positions,
00:35:32.920 but 40% of them are registered nurses and doctors. So when I talk about eliminating some of these
00:35:38.280 positions, we're not eliminating the position, we are removing them back to front lines. And the
00:35:44.200 problem is, is all, everything is just perverse incentives in the BC government and in the different
00:35:49.320 institutions. You make more from stopping being a nurse, which doesn't pay that well in your first few
00:35:55.560 years. So you're probably already pretty resentful. But if you get in good with the union and it's not,
00:36:01.320 again, it's not that unions are bad. It's just that unions have now been taken over by politicians
00:36:06.520 themselves. The people who run them are very much lefty politicians. Cause I heard in the nineties,
00:36:10.360 there was almost a riot with the nurses union when they heard 15% of the healthcare budget was going
00:36:15.160 to administration. These days it's like 50, 50 front lines at administration. But the thing is like,
00:36:21.560 we're the thing is that that's why there's so much bloat is because people who are disgruntled
00:36:27.640 and who are, and who have the right connections can move from being only paid 70,000 a year, 65,000
00:36:33.480 a year as a nurse and bump up to an HR rep or the region. And you're now making 130,000, even though
00:36:40.040 you have actually increased the workload on everyone else, the front lines, it is a vicious cycle.
00:36:44.600 It is. And look, I've seen it happen within unions in my time in union environments. I've seen folks
00:36:51.880 who I honestly didn't think were that exceptional at their job, somehow managed to get involved in
00:36:58.920 union executive roles. And now they are, because they were a union member, they were allowed to be,
00:37:05.400 or they got to be elected into an executive position. And now somehow they're running the union
00:37:11.480 for something that they weren't actually all that good at before. So it really is just a cozy place
00:37:17.000 to land where, in my opinion, you're not really doing that much work. But you're getting to siphon
00:37:21.640 off of union, you're getting to live off of union dues and not really, not really get much,
00:37:27.080 not much done for it. In my opinion, these people in many cases make more than these mayors we just
00:37:32.840 talked about. They're making like executive salaries for being like professional useless people,
00:37:38.680 because a union fundamentally should be an advocacy group for good workers, that these people deserve
00:37:45.640 better. But really, it's that certain members deserve cushy administrative jobs. And I've heard
00:37:51.880 this happens in Alberta all the time, is that people who are really cozy with the Alberta Teachers Union,
00:37:57.480 they will work as a teacher for maybe a semester, maybe a year. And then they'll get bumped up to
00:38:02.280 co-principal at a school, because the schools have a lot of people who want to stay friendly with
00:38:06.680 the Alberta Teachers Union. And the way that you stay friendly is that you give the people that they
00:38:11.160 kind of indicate what should be put in a manager role, into a manager role. And within a couple of
00:38:16.520 decades, even the Calgary Board of Education is full of union people, because they think,
00:38:23.640 okay, we'll take on your people to stay friendly. But then it's union people then promoting good union
00:38:29.000 people into union jobs, the whole thing. It's like unions all the way down.
00:38:31.880 Well, and you know, you've segued into another issue that I know really well, which is education.
00:38:38.360 And here in Victoria, we have an issue where we have our local, the local school board for the
00:38:43.320 last 18-19 months has been running in direct opposition to its community, to every locally
00:38:49.400 elected municipality, to the two indigenous nations that are here, to multi-faith organizations,
00:39:00.120 you name it, parents groups, advocacy organizations, all of them. And essentially, what they did
00:39:04.600 is they kicked school police liaison officers out of their classrooms 18 months ago, out of their
00:39:10.200 schools, pardon me, and said, we don't want them in our schools anymore, for really no reason. So what
00:39:13.800 happened was, at the time, the Human Rights Commissioner for BC, Kasari Govinder, essentially
00:39:21.960 said, we don't have enough information to prove that these school police liaison officers are
00:39:26.120 actually a benefit. And so what we did, because I was on the board at the time, I said, okay, well,
00:39:31.160 let's review. Let's review and see what the community thinks, and let's see what students think, and
00:39:36.360 are they serving a purpose? Are there things we can do to improve? Because I am someone who believes
00:39:40.360 no policy is outside of review. Everything should be reviewed. All of it, right? And so we reviewed
00:39:48.520 it. We got a feedback from the community after about a year and a half or so of talking about this.
00:39:54.920 By and large, everybody wanted the program to stay. Some folks wanted some tweaks, but like a 70%,
00:40:01.640 75% majority surveyed wanted it to stay. Well, I didn't run again, but...
00:40:07.000 Oh, sorry. I was just going to say, I assume that the other 30% wasn't even people who were...
00:40:12.280 I've lost sound with you for some reason. That's weird.
00:40:16.440 Oh, okay. Sorry. Can you hear me now?
00:40:19.640 Yeah. Can you try again? Can you hear me now?
00:40:22.200 Oh, that's weird. It's out of my monitor. Hold on one sec.
00:40:25.080 No worries. I'll let Ryan fix that. But the thing I was going to ask, and which Ryan can respond to in a
00:40:30.520 second, is that even when you see something where it's like 70% of people agree and this happens in
00:40:35.160 polling all the time, that doesn't mean the 30% disagree. So I assume you had a lot of, well,
00:40:39.560 you know, I'm neutral to it as well. We did. We had neutral folks there.
00:40:45.800 We had folks that were just like, yeah, you know, we can see where there are problems,
00:40:48.520 but it should be changed. It should be fixed, which was fine. I didn't run again, but in, I guess,
00:40:54.680 six or seven months after we got those survey results, the school board just said, okay,
00:40:58.280 they're gone. There was no, they just brought a motion to get rid of them. There was no discussion.
00:41:02.840 There was no anything. They just got rid of them. And so the community, of course,
00:41:06.120 has been up in arms about this. We had petitions. We've had protests. And just last week,
00:41:12.200 we had all of the police departments in the community, Victoria, Oak Bay, the West Shore RCMP,
00:41:17.720 Saanich Police Department, all chiefs of police wrote to the minister saying they had no confidence in
00:41:21.880 this school board that they couldn't work with them effectively. And so the minister essentially
00:41:27.800 demanded that this board write some safety plans to put this back in place or to do something to
00:41:34.440 work with the community. We've had the nations also say, because there's a Squamalton Songhees
00:41:38.520 nations here too. They've also said this school board is not engaging with us respectfully. And I really
00:41:44.040 think that this board should have been fired quite a long time ago. And under section 172 of the school act,
00:41:48.680 the minister can appoint an official trustee, that's the word for it, who can take up the
00:41:55.160 roles of a trustee. And under, I think it's subsection C and D, I think there's specific
00:42:01.720 mentions around safety. So I honestly think this board is rogue. They've given an opportunity
00:42:07.480 to try to fix things they don't want to. This is a headache for David Eby because
00:42:12.920 down here in Victoria, it is NDP territory and it has always been NDP territory and people here
00:42:19.400 always vote NDP. But stuff like this starts to happen where the government isn't super responsive,
00:42:24.680 things are getting more dangerous. You know, you don't mess with people's kids. You just don't do it.
00:42:29.400 It feels like in LA. Yeah. Well, I was going to say, it strikes me as something along the lines of
00:42:36.040 like Karen Bass in Los Angeles, cutting the fire department budget because she wants it freed up
00:42:41.560 for other stuff because the government's so bloated, obviously it's hard to even raise spending at this
00:42:45.880 point. So maybe you've got some anti-police progressives on the board who have already an
00:42:51.400 excuse to not want these police resource officers in schools. And it gives them an extra few million
00:42:56.600 dollars to play with if they eliminate it. Well, the funny thing is there's, there's no money.
00:43:02.040 The school board doesn't pay for this. The money comes from, no, no, there's no, like the school
00:43:07.240 board has never paid for this program. The program is paid for entirely by local police. And so this has
00:43:12.920 never been something that the school board ever had to pay for it. They don't save money by getting rid
00:43:17.240 of this. Right. And so, uh, the, it is purely ideological. It is a 100. And what they'll say is they'll say,
00:43:23.800 well, some black and indigenous kids feel unsafe with police in schools. How racist is that?
00:43:33.480 I hate that mentality. I'm like, you might as well start referring to people as slurs if you're going
00:43:38.440 to start basically saying, oh, these people can't have police around. What? That's disgusting to say.
00:43:44.360 It is, it is, it is. It's totally disgusting. And we actually have, uh, we had local members of the,
00:43:50.600 the black community and the indigenous community say, we want police involved. Like maybe we change
00:43:55.400 how they're involved or something, but we want them involved. And so it's, they're completely
00:43:59.640 ignoring them because they're not the right indigenous and black voices for them. The voices
00:44:04.360 that they want are the voices that line up with their ideology. And that's, that's actually what happens
00:44:08.680 all the time in the U S it's usually white progressives telling you that black people don't
00:44:14.360 want police resource officers in their communities or more police doing patrols in their communities.
00:44:18.680 And when they pull those communities, they're like, they're literally the most pro police communities
00:44:23.320 is the black community in America. They're the most pro police. Yeah. So, so yeah, I guess to kind of
00:44:30.040 round all of these pieces up, David Eby's second term has not started well. It's gone about as well
00:44:35.880 as his first, if not worse than his first. Um, and you know, where are we going this year? Well,
00:44:42.120 the budget is going to come down at the end of February when the, uh, actually the beginning of
00:44:45.640 March, when the, uh, the, the legislature comes back in on the 18th. Um, I imagine we're going to get
00:44:52.280 cuts. By the way, something we haven't talked about yet. When is the legislature actually sitting
00:44:59.000 this year? How many days? I think it's 69 days, 67 days, something like that. Yeah. And here's the
00:45:05.320 thing I thought I think is most disgusting about that. It's not because you could say like, oh,
00:45:10.120 well, it's good. Government's not meeting as much. They can't screw as much up. Sure. But the problem
00:45:15.000 is, as you would know, when you're in opposition as the BC conservative party right now, you get
00:45:20.840 fewer opposition days to put forward petitions and do your own bills and do your own commit,
00:45:26.120 like your own work in the, in the legislature. Everything is truncated. Yeah. Everything is truncated.
00:45:32.200 And I think it's because David EB does not like hearing from other people, not people from his
00:45:36.520 own party, not people from the other party. David only listens to David. And so I think that there
00:45:43.080 is a real risk right now. And this is just from my perspective. I haven't talked to anyone that he
00:45:49.000 might have an NDP MLA cross the floor at some point, whether that's to the greens or the conservatives,
00:45:54.760 or just saying I'm an independent now, leave me alone because he talks down to people so much.
00:45:59.960 And he, it seems like he feels like he can just muscle his way through this entire, uh, situation
00:46:05.720 right now. The, the, all the bad economic news, the, the, the Surrey Guilford, uh, riding, uh,
00:46:11.320 like lawsuit, he can just kind of push through and he will eventually win. Cause I'm the leader.
00:46:16.520 Things are not looking good for him on that because, and I'm glad you brought up. So yes,
00:46:20.040 legislature is only in for 67, 69 days, something like that. It's ridiculous because you're right.
00:46:25.320 67. Yeah. 67. You're right. It does not allow the opposition an opportunity to do it's, it's,
00:46:32.040 it's, it's job. It's, you want to call it a Royal prerogative or a democratic prerogative,
00:46:36.280 whatever it is, it doesn't get to do the job of opposing proposing and doing its work and
00:46:40.520 scrutinizing. And EB hates that. That's why in the last session of his government, uh, the last term of
00:46:46.120 his government, he dropped so many bills late and really clipped the, had the time that they could be
00:46:51.720 debated for his closure on quite a few things. Didn't allow any time for stuff, just ran things
00:46:56.680 through. He's probably going to do that again because he has even, uh, even more weak people
00:47:02.280 elected, uh, to now try to argue and push this, this stuff through. That's why we've been on a
00:47:07.080 break for four months since the election. But I just want to hit on something you said around
00:47:11.240 discontent in the party, because you know, I was an NDPer for, for 20 some odd years and, uh,
00:47:17.160 I haven't been in the party now since January, 2023, but people in the party still talk to me
00:47:22.440 and there are unhappy people in the party, very unhappy. And, um, I know that there are folks who
00:47:27.800 feel that he, he is the one who barely law barely, barely won this election. Um, and, and I think,
00:47:35.080 I think he has quite a bit to contend with inside the party. I would not be surprised if there were
00:47:40.360 some really unhappy people who didn't get cabinet promotions, like higher level ministerial positions
00:47:45.800 who should have, who stayed loyal, who stayed behind. Um, and you just have to look at the
00:47:51.880 ridings. And there were a few of them where you had an NDPer win only because there was a former
00:47:59.080 BC United candidate, or there was an independent candidate who pulled votes away from the BC
00:48:04.920 conservative. Otherwise the BC conservative would have won. Look at those ridings. And those are places
00:48:09.960 where I think you have some real potential for disease, uh, and, and upset and unhappiness
00:48:16.360 within the NDP caucus. Now, nobody there that I've talked to has told me anything, but I know other
00:48:20.600 people who, who talk to me about stuff and there's quite a bit of dissatisfaction in that party right
00:48:25.960 now. Yeah. Maybe this is a final point. And then, uh, then I'll, you can talk about a bit about your
00:48:30.360 sub stack, but the place I always kind of circle in on is Surrey, because there's so many of these
00:48:35.560 Surrey, BC NDP, uh, MLAs, especially guys who are more community figures and less NDP ideologues
00:48:44.760 who look at the education minister absolutely getting skunked in the election. And it was
00:48:49.960 specifically because she was the NDP, uh, education minister and could not run away from SOGI 123.
00:48:56.680 I know a lot of these guys in Surrey were running around saying, well, of course I get a free vote
00:49:00.920 on SOGI. Of course I'm against it. They know next election, whenever that comes,
00:49:05.240 they're going to be against potentially the same opponent with more name recognition,
00:49:09.160 more money and more disdain for their position on the issues. If BC conservatives push forward,
00:49:16.840 I would say a dozen votes on everything to do with SOGI around it. You're going to have a lot of these
00:49:21.400 guys find ways of taking an off ramp and joining the BC conservatives, because it's hard to run for
00:49:28.840 reelection when people know you're a fraud on an issue that fundamental to the more socially
00:49:33.720 conservative community in Surrey. Yeah. Or, or they just get challenged, uh, for a nomination.
00:49:39.560 You know, we don't call it primary up here. That's what it is in the States, but essentially that could
00:49:43.000 happen too. I mean, you're not guaranteed a nomination, uh, in the NDP. I, I know, uh, internally,
00:49:48.280 I've seen, uh, uh, folks thinking that they were a shoe in and suddenly their nomination doesn't get
00:49:53.320 approved. Uh, and we in fact saw that when, uh, we saw that with the Nathan Cullen fiasco that happened
00:49:57.880 back in 20, uh, 2020, right. There's, uh, that, that certainly happens and it can happen here.
00:50:02.760 Yeah. So what's, uh, what's your website and, uh, substack all about?
00:50:06.920 So politicalpulse.ca is my substack. Um, essentially it is, uh, a broad cross-section
00:50:14.120 discussion around politics, the, the federal, the provincial. Um, we talk about culture, society.
00:50:20.120 Um, I just had a really good in-depth conversation, uh, with Chris Sankey, who was the North Coast
00:50:27.000 Haida Gwaii candidate, proud indigenous, former indigenous elected official from the Tsimshian,
00:50:32.360 uh, nation. Um, also, uh, a resource, uh, a very proud resource champion, natural resource champion.
00:50:39.160 And Chris had, uh, uh, he had, he had a tough go of it in the last election. Um, he had, uh, some lies
00:50:45.000 told about him by the premier, which made, uh, things very, very difficult and challenging for him.
00:50:49.880 Death threats, uh, included as a result of that. Uh, and so Chris and I got really deep, um, on that. I was
00:50:55.560 his campaign manager. And so there were things that we kind of both got to talk about. Um,
00:50:59.480 I had it behind a paywall, but I actually had quite a few people say, we want to see this whole video
00:51:03.560 with you and Chris. So I un-paywalled it. So now people can just go and watch the whole video.
00:51:08.520 Um, I had a discussion with former federal minister of health, Ujjal Dessange, also former premier of BC.
00:51:14.280 We talked about, um, uh, what Ujjal says is Canada descending into a nation of street fights. Um,
00:51:20.920 and it was a really fascinating conversation. He had, he doesn't pull his punches when he tells
00:51:25.960 you what he thinks about Justin Trudeau. I really, you know, I really like Ujjal Dessange. That's a
00:51:29.480 good one to check out. So I'll be linking cause I, this won't be released right away. So everyone,
00:51:34.680 I will be linking the Chris Sankey interview in the description below. So you can go check that out.
00:51:39.240 It's going to be pinned at the top of the comments as well as, uh, Ryan's overall, like,
00:51:43.560 sub stack as well. If you go, want to go over and subscribe. Uh, but definitely I'm going to have
00:51:48.040 you back on. Cause it sounds like, you know, the policy better than I do. I'm never going to be
00:51:52.520 the person saying like, you know, the elections act, subsection, whatever here. I'm a policy guy
00:51:58.280 who hates reading policy. I, you know what? Uh, I, I don't know at all why it, but I tell you,
00:52:04.440 there's some stuff that I can go really deep into because I'm a bit of a nerd with certain things.
00:52:09.080 Um, you know, don't, don't ask me about health stuff because I could go a high level on health stuff,
00:52:14.280 but on education, on things like mining, natural resources, I'm all over it.
00:52:19.080 Yeah. I was going to say one more thing, uh, shout out to Chris Sankey, because I was just
00:52:23.000 looking at the 2020 election results to the 2024 election results. And despite there being no
00:52:28.440 third party candidates, uh, Chris Sankey went from, uh, cause the BC liberals, their candidate
00:52:34.120 last time, Roy Jones Jr. Got 22% of the vote. It was the more technically conservative option
00:52:39.560 compared to the NDP. And he ended up getting Chris Sankey got 35%. So that's a 12% increase.
00:52:46.520 Very, very respectable in a riding like North coast height of Gwaii. That is never expected to even
00:52:51.720 have a large conservative population. And now you're actually probably in punching distance
00:52:57.080 for whenever the next election breaks. We're very proud of that outcome. We poured everything into
00:53:00.760 that race, man. And, and, uh, we didn't have a huge team, uh, but we had a lot of heart and we're,
00:53:07.160 we're proud of that. And there's a lot that we both learned coming out of that, that campaign.
00:53:10.920 Yeah, no, I was, I was like, uh, people who are good at campaigning actually try hard on the ground
00:53:15.560 because so many people in the campaigning world think it's that, you know, your social media ads
00:53:21.400 and your brand that are going to pull you through. It's like, that's a, that's a quarter of the campaign.
00:53:26.360 A quarter is your local ads. A quarter is your door knocking. And as quarter is the candidate
00:53:30.520 actually themselves going out there and talking to people. So many people think you can win with one
00:53:35.560 to three of the quarters. You need all four. You need all four. Yeah. You need all four.
00:53:40.840 Anyways. Well, thanks for coming on the show, Ryan. And definitely we'll be seeing
00:53:44.360 you in the coming months as things in BC continue to be insane. Have a great one.