The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Jagmeet Singh proves why he is Canada's worst politician

00:00:00.000 In a piece of absolutely non-breaking news, Jagmeet Singh and the federal NDP are still

00:00:05.680 terrible at politics. I know that's not shocking to any of you, but it's still baffling to me,

00:00:11.720 because I imagine right now it's better than ever to be the NDP, because Justin Trudeau and the

00:00:17.320 Liberal Party are extremely unpopular, and in theory the NDP should be a fairly logical next

00:00:23.620 party to be voting for for a lot of disenfranchised Liberal voters. But Jagmeet Singh and the NDP

00:00:29.320 seem to be perfect at triangulating the wrong tone and wrong positions on every single issue

00:00:35.900 to make sure that Canadians don't trust them. Like right now, Canadians think we spend way too

00:00:40.700 much in government. They think there's way too many regulations, taxes are too high, and they don't

00:00:45.980 like the progressive sanctimoniousness of Justin Trudeau. And then Jagmeet Singh rocks up to the

00:00:52.420 podium and basically says, I'm going to be Justin Trudeau on steroids. More spending, just hyper

00:00:58.040 progressive as ever. I want even more regulations. I want to attack the rich with knives and spears and

00:01:05.040 whatnot. Like he's just a militant socialist at a time when people don't like that. They think that 0.99

00:01:11.500 Justin Trudeau is too much of that. And now Jagmeet Singh is saying, I'll be that even harder. And I love

00:01:18.940 looking at Jagmeet Singh's social media, because he just doesn't get it. He just doesn't get that nobody

00:01:24.700 takes him seriously. And now he's trying to pick fights with conservative federal leader, Pierre

00:01:29.120 Polyev, as if anyone thinks of these two as like contenders. Jagmeet Singh is like an afterthought in

00:01:35.620 federal politics. He's a fourth place seated party behind the Bloc Québécois, a party that only runs in

00:01:42.280 one province. Nobody thinks that Jagmeet Singh is going to be prime minister. He can say when I'm prime

00:01:47.580 minister as many times as he likes. But people are only ever going to laugh at that as if he's

00:01:52.400 trying to be self depreciating. Like it's a great comedy bit for Jagmeet Singh to say when I'm prime

00:01:58.600 minister. But now he's posting stuff like this as if like Pierre Polyev takes him seriously, fears at

00:02:04.800 him at all, or even thinks about Jagmeet Singh. I don't think Polyev ever thinks of Jagmeet Singh unless

00:02:11.440 he's using effectively his political corpse to beat Justin Trudeau. But so this is something that

00:02:16.560 Jagmeet Singh posted today. And you can see my comment underneath it. He said this weekend,

00:02:21.340 I gave Pierre Polyev an ultimatum 48 hours to stop blocking access to birth control for women and

00:02:27.120 Canadians. Today is the deadline. He can withdraw or we'll stop him. He'll he's going to learn never

00:02:34.280 mess with women's rights in Canada again. And I just said, I'm sorry, sir. Who are you? Because who is

00:02:41.120 this guy? What who does he think he is? Like, obviously, I know who Jagmeet Singh is,

00:02:45.900 thus the rant so far. But who actually cares about who Jagmeet Singh is, and what his personal

00:02:52.460 problem with Pierre Polyev is? I don't know if Jagmeet Singh knows this. But Pierre Polyev is not

00:02:58.900 the current prime minister of the country. That would be Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. It's in the name

00:03:03.640 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Pierre Polyev, maybe it's because he's so high in the polls and Jagmeet Singh is so

00:03:09.440 low that Jagmeet Singh in a weird psychological way already associates Pierre Polyev with the

00:03:14.880 prime ministership. But one, the conservatives aren't blocking anything. They are a opposition

00:03:21.020 party. And you and the liberals in the bloc currently hold the majority, even if Jagmeet Singh didn't vote

00:03:27.680 for this birth control thing. The bloc would. Jagmeet Singh is not even a player in this conversation.

00:03:33.740 He doesn't actually factor in at all. And he's like putting ultimatums to Pierre Polyev. Ooh,

00:03:40.120 Polyev, if you don't respond to me, then I'm going to do something like what you're going to pass the 0.98

00:03:45.740 bill anyways. Like, yeah, the conservatives are not voting for this bloated pharmacare bill and all the

00:03:51.520 other provisions. And because one, it's inefficient and will not actually get many people medication.

00:03:57.180 And two, it's causing crazy inflation, which is just going to cause more people to not be able to

00:04:02.100 afford their own medication and thus require more government support. It's a completely circular

00:04:08.360 policy, just as all socialist policies are. And Jagmeet Singh is like trying to make this like a

00:04:14.080 emotional war between him and Pierre Polyev. Polyev, I've left you 10,000 messages on your machine.

00:04:20.980 Why haven't you called me back? Like, I expect Jagmeet Singh to start crying next time he talks about

00:04:27.540 Polyev not like noticing his existence because he doesn't matter. And now I just want to go over to 0.95

00:04:33.340 this other video because this video is so, in a certain sense, whiny. At the same time, it's like

00:04:39.740 deeply insecure. I know those two things aren't too far off, but one, he's whining about having no

00:04:46.180 donors himself. And then he's just deeply insecure about his own support base. But this is Jagmeet Singh

00:04:52.600 with his post on X that says, 100 reasons not to trust Pierre Polyev. And notice that ratio,

00:04:58.960 3,800 people commenting on this video with only 962 liking it. And I can guarantee you a lot of

00:05:06.480 those retweets are either ironic or just quote teats making fun of him. But check this out where he's

00:05:12.220 basically upset that Polyev is popular enough to actually be able to raise money.

00:05:16.340 Let me give you 100 reasons why not to trust Pierre Polyev. 100 of the nation's leading corporate

00:05:21.900 lobbyists, both former and present, have met with and donated to Pierre Polyev. These aren't just any

00:05:26.960 old corporate lobbyists. These are the ones that represent the greedy CEOs.

00:05:30.900 Oh, the greedy CEOs, not like all those other corporate lobbyists who are good.

00:05:36.160 I'm just going to say this right now. This is so ironic for Jagmeet Singh to be saying.

00:05:40.200 The NDP is effectively a lobbyist party. It is a public sector union lobbyist party. That's the only

00:05:47.440 reason they exist. That's the only reason they get seats, is because QP and Unifor and all the other

00:05:53.500 unions effectively force their members or push their members into donating to the NDP. They have

00:05:59.380 massive lobbying front groups who act as NDP front groups for federal politics. Why do you think the

00:06:05.500 unions pretty much always endorse the NDP, except until recently where some of them will endorse the 1.00

00:06:10.680 liberals because Jagmeet Singh is pants on head stupid. But for the most part, they always vote 1.00

00:06:15.880 for the NDP. Yes, union members. I know a lot of you probably work for public sector unions and you

00:06:21.880 hate the way that your unions represent you in federal policy. But the NDP is the most lobbyist

00:06:27.980 heavy party in the country because all of its support comes from lobbyists. All of its donations

00:06:33.100 come from lobby groups or non-profit far-left workers. I'm going to keep letting it go. But he's

00:06:39.760 like, oh, these people are representing greedy CEOs in the oil and gas industry.

00:06:44.240 Yes. These are the ones that represent the greedy CEOs. Big oil and gas, big pharma,

00:06:48.580 big corporate landlords and real estate investors. That's who he's meeting. And it shows in the way

00:06:53.560 he's voting. I'll let you make your own determination, but I don't think it's a

00:06:56.540 coincidence that he voted against a pharma care, which would have meant lower cost for medication,

00:07:01.460 something that big pharma is clearly opposed to. He voted against a school lunch program,

00:07:05.420 which would have saved money for families, made sure kids aren't hungry,

00:07:07.700 but would maybe impact that bottom line for big corporate grocery stores. He voted against...

00:07:13.640 Sorry, what corporate lobbyist was opposing school lunch programs? There's a lot of reasons to

00:07:19.680 oppose school lunch programs or other pharma care, universal dental programs, because they just don't

00:07:25.140 work. They're inefficient. And the fact that you actually are, these programs are increasing

00:07:29.400 inflation, which is the reason people need to access them. Why do you think kids are going to school

00:07:33.740 hungry, Jagmeet? You and Justin have been running this country for eight years. I know that Jagmeet

00:07:39.680 and the MDP have only been involved since 2019. But still, to be fair, that's when the vast majority

00:07:44.740 of the problems started. But people need these programs because you're bankrupting them. And so

00:07:49.420 they don't really need these programs. They need you to stop trying to bankrupt them, and then they will

00:07:53.680 not need them anymore. But apparently, Pure Polyev is sitting in the background scheming with Galen

00:07:59.700 Weston and greedy CEOs to prevent little Sammy from getting a sandwich. No, it's not happening.

00:08:06.980 But Jagmeet Singh is like fighting on behalf of fake people, fake individuals, and fake individuals who

00:08:12.900 in theory, he was the one who actually harmed. A renter's protection fund, which would protect 0.50

00:08:17.700 renters against big corporate landlords. Again, he sided with big corporate landlords. It is very clear

00:08:23.700 whose side he's on. I'll let you be the one to judge all these things. But let's be clear,

00:08:27.700 new Democrats are on your side. We've been fighting for you. We don't work for the billionaires,

00:08:31.620 for the big corporations. We work for you. You just voted for the big corporation

00:08:36.980 budget. He called the Liberals 2024 budget a big corporate lobbyist conservative budget,

00:08:44.740 and it's a big corporate welfare budget. And then he voted for it. And guess who didn't vote for it?

00:08:49.460 The conservatives. Apparently, this was their budget. This was everything the conservatives wanted,

00:08:54.180 and they voted against it. Because it turns out the conservatives actually want less spending,

00:08:57.940 just as most Canadians want less spending. It's unheard of in Canada to actually have a situation

00:09:04.180 where people want less spending. Because Canada, there's a lot of default Liberals,

00:09:08.820 especially in Eastern Canada, who associate more spending with more prosperity. Because the idea is

00:09:14.340 that nasty, evil conservatives in the United States always want to cut spending, even though,

00:09:18.900 again, Democrats or Republicans always increase spending no matter who's in power. And they 0.80

00:09:23.060 think of it as a very Canadian thing to have more state intervention in the economy and more programs

00:09:28.100 and all this stuff. Getting the vast majority of Canadians, like 67%, to say, yes, we have way too

00:09:34.100 much spending, please cut it, is insane. And that's not with the rest of people, the other 33%, 0.99

00:09:40.980 wanting more spending. No, no, no. That's what like another 15% saying, oh, I don't know if we have,

00:09:46.020 we need to reduce or keep spending at the right level. Like there's very, there's only about 10%

00:09:51.300 people, maybe 18%, who think spending needs to go up. And I guess they're all voting for the NDP

00:09:56.820 and the Greens and some are still voting for the Liberals. But Jagmeet Singh is just embarrassing.

00:10:02.340 He doesn't know how to orient himself in this political landscape at all. The idea that he's

00:10:07.060 fighting back against the CEOs while he's literally in government and pretending that pure poly of

00:10:12.260 his big role blocked all of his priorities is just embarrassing. He cannot read the political room.

00:10:17.620 But anyways, I just want to quickly talk about one other thing, the stupid disinformation poll that 0.99

00:10:22.580 Frank Graves released that some Liberals are making a lot of hay about. It's just too small of a topic 0.97

00:10:27.540 for me to turn into its own video. It would be only like three minutes. So I'm just gonna quickly address

00:10:32.500 that. But first, I just want to bring up the map of the riding that I'm running in. Again, I always plug

00:10:38.020 this. Again, my name is Wyatt Claypool. I'm running for the federal conservative party nomination in

00:10:42.100 Calgary Signal Hill here. So here's the city of Calgary. I just realized I never actually show you

00:10:46.820 guys what the ridings look like to make it easier to understand what I'm talking about. So if you live

00:10:51.060 in the city of Calgary, this is the riding I'm running in right here. Here's all the communities,

00:10:55.540 Discovery Ridge, Glen Morgan, Glenbrook, Calgary, Signal Hill, Aspen, West Springs, all this. You have

00:11:01.940 Crestmont Valley Ridge, all this is in bounds. So if you live in any of this area of Calgary,

00:11:11.460 please make sure to buy a conservative party membership and check out my website and description

00:11:16.580 below, wyattclaypool.com. But now I want to move on to Mark Gerritsen, everyone's least favorite

00:11:23.620 liberal MP going on about this stupid disinformation poll done by Frank Graves over at ECOS, 0.97

00:11:30.660 like supposedly showing that conservatives believe disinformation more than any other party. 0.99

00:11:37.300 So check this out. He says, the only thing more alarming than this crap is that those in the high 0.99

00:11:42.420 and very, those in the high and very high category will claim this is fake news. It just is fake news. 0.99

00:11:48.980 I don't want to go into the particular questions, but if you guys know anything about this Frank Graves

00:11:55.380 disinformation poll that he releases every once in a while, it's entirely fake. Like that's the only

00:12:00.740 way I can really put this. What he like, what he considers disinformation is insane. He thinks

00:12:07.220 that if you don't think that Canada's GDP is increasing the fastest out of the entire G7,

00:12:13.380 that's disinformation. If you don't believe that climate change is purely due to human action,

00:12:20.100 that's disinformation. Even though you can literally look at a climate chart of warmer

00:12:24.340 and cooler periods going on for a thousand years. No, that is disinformation to believe

00:12:29.780 that it is not the vast majority of human action causing the climate to potentially be warming right

00:12:35.220 now. It's silly. Obviously carbon in the atmosphere warms the climate. If you put anything in the 0.95

00:12:40.260 atmosphere, it'd warm the climate. If you just shot up a bunch of gummy bears into the atmosphere and

00:12:45.060 had them floating around the planet, that would potentially affect the climate. It's just how

00:12:49.540 anything in the climate will change things. But the climate also changes on its own too. That's just

00:12:54.420 how it works. I know I'm going to have like press progress on me or some left-wing think tank

00:12:59.060 saying that I'm like a danger to Canada as a conservative candidate, because I think that there are many

00:13:04.820 things that change the climate. Should we want lower emissions? Maybe. Also, we shouldn't make

00:13:10.580 people's lives worse to do it. But all of the questions in this disinformation poll are just

00:13:15.380 backhanded. Some of them are legitimate disinformation. I'd agree with that. When

00:13:21.300 people say 100% of the money being sent to Ukraine is all money laundering. Yeah, that's not correct.

00:13:26.660 That's just not true. People will believe very hyperbolic things because it feels emotionally

00:13:32.660 resonant. Like I talk to liberals all the time at the doors while I'm door knocking and they'll

00:13:37.700 say things like, well, the UCP lowered healthcare spending. No, they didn't. No party in Alberta has

00:13:43.700 reduced healthcare spending since like the Ralph Klein days. And he was more so efficient, making

00:13:48.740 the healthcare system more efficient, which is why our wait times even went down when he was the

00:13:52.900 premier. But you'll just have people casually say things that are just not true at all. But Frank

00:13:57.620 Greggs would never ask people, did the conservatives in your province lower or raise healthcare

00:14:02.580 spending? He would never test that. He's only testing things that might trip up conservatives.

00:14:07.620 And then the joke is half of the questions are not even really disinformation to believe it. It's

00:14:12.900 just that you disagree with Frank Greggs' opinion. Obviously, if I put in a question about do crystals

00:14:19.460 help you heal from terminal illnesses, that would catch up a lot of liberal and green party voters

00:14:27.220 because they have a lot of granola naturalist type people who vote for them. I talk to enough

00:14:31.940 liberal people, there's a lot of still hippie-ish liberals out there. There's lots of ways I could

00:14:36.340 construct any poll in order to tell me that the other party supporters are bad, nasty people who 1.00

00:14:41.860 believe stupid things. Obviously. Have you ever talked to people? A lot of people believe a lot of 1.00

00:14:46.740 silly things. But Frank Greggs is so insecure because he's a deep, deep liberal that he keeps putting 0.59

00:14:51.860 out these scuffed polls. I don't even think he believes these polls aren't accurate. I think

00:14:56.420 he's just so liberal, he can't put together a good poll. So at the same time that every other pollster

00:15:02.180 is showing conservatives at anywhere from 18 to 21 points ahead of the liberals, Frank Greggs is like

00:15:08.820 showing that the conservatives are only had by like 10 points. And he's saying, well, no, no, no,

00:15:12.980 this is accurate because, you know, I crunched the numbers multiple times as we always verify that our

00:15:18.820 sampling is right. Dude, how did you get like only like 50% or it's like 47% of people in Alberta

00:15:26.260 saying they're voting conservative? That's like a gimme that the conservatives are going to be at

00:15:30.100 like 63%, maybe minimum 60. But he looks at, he gets all these crazy polling results where somehow

00:15:38.340 like Manitoba was the vast majority of the Western pro, not the vast majority, but it was disproportionately

00:15:43.940 pulled Manitoba. And then he's not confused on why he gets way more liberal supporters in

00:15:48.580 Western Canada when he pulled Manitoba more than he pulled Saskatchewan proportionately to their

00:15:53.940 populations. Ugh. For the most part, polling is actually very accurate. But whenever bad polling

00:16:00.180 comes out, it annoys me to no end. Whether the question's badly formed or the sampling is totally

00:16:06.660 off, I hate it. Like I hate whenever pollsters, and again, all these pollsters genuinely are trying

00:16:12.660 to be accurate. Even Frank Greggs is trying to be accurate because the whole point is they do this free

00:16:16.740 polling. They don't get paid at all for this polling. They do free polling on politics in

00:16:21.300 order to attract businesses to hire them to do their market research. I would never hire ECOS based

00:16:26.900 on how badly they do these things. But a lot of pollsters have a very urban liberal bias because

00:16:31.780 if they're doing phone polls or other sorts of IVR polls, when you phone up a farmer in Western Canada,

00:16:38.180 he's not going to pick up a phone in the middle of his workday to answer a 20 minute survey on politics.

00:16:44.180 A public sector union worker working downtown Vancouver will 100% pick up the phone because

00:16:49.220 they're not doing anything. They can take a poll at any time of day, where conservatives tend to be

00:16:53.780 more disproportionately represented in trades, small business ownership, the type of people who do not

00:16:59.300 want to waste their time with some pollster on the phone. So that's where you have to kind of look at

00:17:03.860 polls, sometimes with a grain of salt, whenever it's showing like a massive swing in favor of the NDP,

00:17:09.700 in or like the NDP is majorly ahead in British Columbia, despite the fact that everyone thinks

00:17:14.660 the NDP is failing on the issues. It's because there's a lot of voters that end up being contacted

00:17:19.620 in downtown Vancouver, and it makes the rest of the province look far more orange than it really is.

00:17:24.980 Oh, okay. Well, that turned into a very long rant about polling. I am so sorry, everyone.

00:17:29.300 Anyways, so as I said before, if you live in Calgary Signal Hill, check out my website,

00:17:34.100 wyatclaypool.com, buy a federal conservative party membership to vote for me. And you can also

00:17:38.580 donate to the TNT Legal Fund in the Give, Send, Go link in the description below. And then there is

00:17:45.860 the TNT Telegram channel linked there as well, if you want to subscribe to that to get all of the new

00:17:51.220 videos that we released just sent right to you, rather than having to rely on YouTube notifying

00:17:56.740 you whenever we put out a new piece of content. Anyways, that should be it for me, guys. Have a good one.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - May 06, 2024

Jagmeet Singh proves why he is Canada's worst politician

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript