The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - June 10, 2024


Justin Trudeau's desperate attempt to smear Pierre Poilievre!


Episode Stats


Length

19 minutes

Words per minute

182.67241

Word count

3,590

Sentence count

242

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Puripolyev has been accused of being a "bad guy" by the Liberal Party of Canada for coming out publicly as gay and supporting the LGBTQ+ community. I'm here to tell you that he's not, and he is not a bad man.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Well, guys, it's another day ending in why. So Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party of Canada are throwing more spaghetti at the wall, hoping something will eventually stick.
00:00:10.760 And by this, I mean they are throwing mud at Puripolyev, trying to smear his character, thinking that this is their route back into being competitive in the next federal election.
00:00:20.480 It's not going to happen. The next federal election is effectively being conducted along the lines of people's opinions on Justin Trudeau and the Liberals' record.
00:00:31.040 Saying that Puripolyev is a bad man does not actually make people like the Liberal Party.
00:00:37.020 And on top of that, what they're saying about Puripolyev is not really even criticisms.
00:00:41.620 It's just kind of like vague, well, he's sort of nasty, without being able to really prove anything.
00:00:48.240 And if anything, that just makes people more skeptical of the perspective that the Liberals are coming from.
00:00:54.540 When you actually have very concrete criticisms that can be made against you, you're deeply corrupt, your policy sucks, you guys, like, talk to people in a very high-handed manner.
00:01:05.580 That, being paired up with you attacking Puripolyev because he's far right or something, only makes you seem more pathetic and desperate.
00:01:13.940 And that's what all of the stuff is. So I want to look through several social media posts here, including some videos that the Liberal Party has posted to their own social media.
00:01:23.460 That's the funny thing here. I never go and find some sort of right-wing account that's going after the Liberals and just, like, reacting to it.
00:01:32.580 Like, oh, look at them making fun of Justin Trudeau. Justin Trudeau is such an idiot.
00:01:35.960 I go and look up the Liberals' own stuff, and I just criticize that. It's hilarious how bad their own social media is.
00:01:44.200 Again, I stand by what I've said for a while now. The Liberals need to fire their communications team.
00:01:50.040 These people don't know the Liberal Party's strengths. Really, there's not that many that exist.
00:01:54.580 I'm obviously a conservative. I don't want the Liberals to win.
00:01:57.320 But it seems like their comms team doesn't understand how to reach middle-class Canadians who don't already like them.
00:02:03.940 So they keep putting out stuff that makes them look really petty and weak.
00:02:08.020 So first up, we have this graphic that the Liberals posted.
00:02:12.520 It says, up top, Puripolyev will pander to the far right and leave 2SLGBTQI plus Canadians behind. 0.98
00:02:20.960 Guys, for one thing, never use that full acronym. It's annoying, and it just makes people roll their eyes at you.
00:02:26.140 If you're going to say something, just say LGBT. That's it. 1.00
00:02:30.260 If you say the full thing, you guys seem like you're pandering to the far-left, hyper-progressive urbanites,
00:02:36.180 who are the only people that appeal to.
00:02:38.580 But the rest of the graphic is based off of a Hill Times headline,
00:02:44.020 the Hill Times being a very center-left, liberal, biased publication.
00:02:48.420 And the graphic says,
00:02:50.740 Polyev's comments on trans people show he's taking cues from far-right and PPC factions, observers say.
00:02:57.620 And observers say, they're not even saying experts say.
00:03:00.360 It's just merely, this man has eyes, and he's observed something.
00:03:04.000 And because he's liberal, he's saying that Puripolyev's a bad man.
00:03:06.640 I even defended Puripolyev back in the day when he had, you know, rightfully so, 0.94
00:03:12.140 when he had come out against gender theory and a lot of this sort of trans rhetoric being taught in the classroom.
00:03:18.540 It's dangerous to kids.
00:03:19.560 I even got attacked by press progress in an article where they're saying,
00:03:23.820 I didn't care about, like, you know, gay or trans kids being abused.
00:03:26.900 They had no evidence, so the headline was basically their only evidence.
00:03:29.920 They were made-up headline.
00:03:30.680 And then the rest of the article proved that I didn't say anything wrong.
00:03:34.380 And this is basically what they're still digging up.
00:03:37.580 Something from back in, like, November.
00:03:40.180 Because I remember I made the video defending Polyev, then press progress attacked me.
00:03:45.020 It wasn't the Hill Times at the time.
00:03:46.780 But the Hill Times is digging up stories from eight months ago that already didn't play ball.
00:03:53.480 And now they're trying to push it again because maybe the second time we try and smear Puripolyev along these lines,
00:03:59.820 it'll work.
00:04:01.440 Also, I just want to slip in here.
00:04:03.100 It's very deeply ironic that I was defending Puripolyev.
00:04:05.840 Rightfully so.
00:04:06.540 He deserves to be defended on all these things.
00:04:08.740 And then in my writing of Calgary Signal Hill,
00:04:11.040 somebody in the background of the Conservative Party disqualified me from the Signal Hill Conservative Party nomination.
00:04:17.100 But I'm appealing that.
00:04:18.240 I'll get into that more in the future.
00:04:20.880 But that's just a little feeler for you guys.
00:04:22.980 There's some insiders that definitely shouldn't be inside the Conservative Party
00:04:26.660 who are tired of leading it astray in certain ways.
00:04:28.980 But now I want to get to the second Liberal graphic right here.
00:04:32.700 And again, it's more stuff trying to make you panic because Puripolyev might be fiscally responsible.
00:04:39.340 That's effectively what this is all getting at.
00:04:41.540 So we have the Liberal Party saying Puripolyev would make deep cuts that would gut the middle class.
00:04:47.580 Guys, the middle class is already deteriorating.
00:04:50.700 Either people are getting a lot of Liberal government subsidies through their fake businesses,
00:04:55.100 like many Liberal ministers are even getting in there entering the upper class.
00:04:59.020 Or like most people, they're either struggling to stay middle class or they're slipping into the lower middle class
00:05:04.740 because of just the general cost of things.
00:05:07.280 And it's not businesses' fault.
00:05:09.460 It's not the grocery cartels.
00:05:11.340 It's taxes.
00:05:12.300 It's regulations.
00:05:13.280 It's a lot of things that the government controls.
00:05:16.340 Because guess what?
00:05:17.320 Before the government started messing around, nothing was wrong.
00:05:20.240 There's this like left-wing conspiracy theory that every time the government starts meddling in the economy,
00:05:26.800 then everything that went wrong was actually just big business doing it.
00:05:31.200 Basically, they're acting like big business.
00:05:32.880 Because once the Liberals raised taxes or regulations, that didn't actually affect prices.
00:05:37.400 But corporations are coming to collude to then raise prices in the aftermath of these regulatory changes
00:05:43.820 and pretend that it was the government's fault, as if it's not the government's fault.
00:05:47.380 That's where I always say the left is actually so much more conspiratorial than any factions on the right
00:05:52.820 because they truly think everything down to the price of bread is being fixed by a shadowy cabal of people.
00:05:59.180 But the graphic then says, Polyev's message signals plans for an austerity agenda.
00:06:05.860 And I just got to say, guys, when 67% of Canadians in polling are saying that we spend too much money on the federal level,
00:06:14.680 this message does not work.
00:06:17.320 Trying to make people scared of austerity is really just trying to threaten them with a good time.
00:06:22.300 But then we have the Liberals now going after Peter Polyev on firearms.
00:06:25.740 This liberal post says, liberals have delivered some of the strongest gun control laws in Canadian history.
00:06:31.380 Peter Polyev would weaken them.
00:06:33.200 Now, I'm a very pro-gun guy.
00:06:35.220 But what's so pathetic about this is that the Liberals haven't even pushed their actual gun ban yet.
00:06:40.800 They haven't tried to buy back any of the guns because they know it's a deeply unpopular thing that they've been pushing.
00:06:46.800 People think that the real problem, rightfully so, is gang violence that the Liberals have been going soft on.
00:06:52.580 And now the Liberals are trying to pat themselves on the back for something that they're not even really technically doing.
00:06:57.260 Like, yeah, they banned some models of weapons and you can't purchase handguns.
00:07:00.640 But if anything, based on what they were promising their base, they've actually kind of gone soft.
00:07:04.760 But I'll look at the banning assault weapons and implementing national freeze on handguns.
00:07:12.860 I should probably mute that because in a previous video, they tried to slam me for playing five seconds of a song.
00:07:20.380 But it says, conservatives want to roll back our progress and weaken gun control in Canada.
00:07:25.340 Has crime fallen since Justin Trudeau took office?
00:07:28.400 Like, no. And this is where I'd kind of get frustrated with just the mentality of many liberal Canadians that we can pass policies that even if I disagree with them on a fundamental level,
00:07:39.340 I think going after gun rights is basically going after all property rights.
00:07:43.320 I maybe don't own a gun, but I understand somebody's ability to own a gun is what gives me the right to own a car.
00:07:49.960 And the government not saying, well, your car is hurting people through the environment.
00:07:53.560 So we actually can ban your driving more than 20 kilometers a day or whatever.
00:07:58.880 That's where I understand that guns are important.
00:08:01.840 But even if you're like a liberal, wouldn't you even if you think inherently guns are evil,
00:08:06.760 wouldn't you think that, well, crime's gotten so much worse while we're doing all the gun control stuff?
00:08:11.420 Maybe law abiding gun owners weren't the problem here. 0.98
00:08:14.180 But maybe I'm asking for too much by simply inquiring about that.
00:08:18.540 But now I want to get to the magnum opus of the liberals new strategy to go after Pure Polyev. 0.79
00:08:25.000 They have this new candidate for the riding of Ottawa Carlton, which is where Pure Polyev is the current MP. 0.89
00:08:33.040 This man, Bruce Fanjoy, who apparently has blocked me and blocked half the Internet on Twitter.
00:08:39.480 I guess he knows he's not going to be an MP since if he was going to be an MP, he would know that he'd have to unblock all these people later.
00:08:45.820 And so he's blocking everybody because he knows he's going to get smashed in the next election.
00:08:50.220 But they're using this Bruce Fanjoy man to go after Pure Polyev in his home riding and try and make you think that he's an evil, racist, homophobic, nasty person.
00:09:00.280 In 2004, what does that year mean to you?
00:09:03.800 To us here in Carleton, it was the year we got Pure Polyev.
00:09:08.080 He was elected 20 years ago.
00:09:10.660 And well, we don't have a lot to show for it.
00:09:13.280 In his first year, he voted against same-sex marriage.
00:09:17.080 In year four...
00:09:17.860 That's like an extremely normal thing to have voted for in 2004.
00:09:22.460 I don't know why people are like thinking that this is a big gotcha against Pure Polyev.
00:09:26.320 Or he told indigenous peoples that they needed to learn the value of hard work more than they needed compensation for residential school.
00:09:34.220 That's also just a big misquote of Pure Polyev from the time.
00:09:37.180 Like there's a big sort of like hoopla around the fact that Harper had to go after Pure Polyev for making that comment.
00:09:43.340 But it was more so that Pure Polyev said something that a lot of conservatives do in fact think.
00:09:47.560 That the problem on indigenous reserves is that the government is too much and there's not enough room for actual individual effort.
00:09:53.980 Pure Polyev was never saying like indigenous people are lazy.
00:09:56.600 He was saying that there's not enough incentive for people to go and do for themselves.
00:10:02.300 Which is the problem with the welfare state in general which affects literally every community.
00:10:06.800 It just affects the indigenous community in particular because that's where the government absolutely dumps resources.
00:10:12.520 And it's been incredibly toxic for that particular community.
00:10:16.960 In year 10, he made it harder for Canadians to vote.
00:10:20.300 In year 18...
00:10:21.300 Do I have to tell you that that's not true at all?
00:10:23.460 Also think about how much they're having to jump around in a minute and a half video where they could name a lot of great points about things that he did that were objectively bad for the country.
00:10:33.440 And like why would anyone do that?
00:10:35.140 Oh, I can't believe he like hurt these middle class people.
00:10:38.140 They can't...
00:10:38.460 They're finding like these like points where only if you're very much already in the liberal camp, you don't believe them.
00:10:45.460 The Fair Elections Act was actually trying to make sure that there was more integrity around voting, having voter ID.
00:10:51.840 But liberals don't believe in voter ID.
00:10:53.940 So I guess it was horrible that they did this.
00:10:56.360 There were some other issues around third party advertisers that they were legislating on.
00:11:00.320 It was not at all something that was hurting democracy.
00:11:04.220 But they're going to just sprinkle that in there and then move on because that's easier.
00:11:07.600 Just, you know, drive by shooting of a smear attack against polyeth.
00:11:11.780 Don't substantiate any of it because if you actually went into detail, you'd look like a clown.
00:11:15.980 So that's why...
00:11:17.120 This is also why the liberals are losing.
00:11:19.220 Their propaganda must stay as surface level as humanly possible.
00:11:22.260 Because if you dip below the surface at all, you realize there's nuance here and that you can't smear pure polyeth based on any of this stuff.
00:11:29.040 He encouraged chaos on the streets of Ottawa and across the country at great expense to the public and the economy.
00:11:38.660 Did lockdowns hurt the public or the economy?
00:11:42.020 Just asking Mr. Bruce Fanjoy or whatever his name is.
00:11:45.740 I feel like I already forgot his first name.
00:11:47.540 Maybe the lockdowns actually hurt people.
00:11:50.560 That might have been why people showed up to Ottawa.
00:11:53.160 I hate this idea that people are like, did you...
00:11:55.700 It was illegal to park trucks around Parliament Hill.
00:11:58.380 Yeah, in a normal year, that's fully illegal.
00:12:00.460 You can't do that.
00:12:01.280 Also, the whole point was the people who showed up to Ottawa were voluntarily engaging in something that was illegal because of what the government was doing was also illegal.
00:12:12.660 And frankly, you could probably add evil on top of that, basically saying you're no longer allowed to drive your own truck, which you are the only person in the cabin of because you're unvaccinated. 0.92
00:12:22.400 That might have caused people to show up to Ottawa.
00:12:25.620 So yes, can you not usually illegally park trucks around Parliament Hill?
00:12:31.040 Sure.
00:12:31.480 Also, maybe don't give people big incentives to do that.
00:12:42.820 You know what?
00:12:44.240 Screw this.
00:12:44.920 Oh, sorry.
00:12:45.500 You guys didn't actually see what was going on there.
00:12:47.160 I was just playing that.
00:12:47.800 But this is what he just said on in this next point.
00:12:51.140 Screw this guy.
00:13:02.900 That is a disgusting lie.
00:13:05.240 Do you know what the Conservatives vote on?
00:13:07.100 I'm a pro-life person.
00:13:08.380 I think there should be discussions around these issues.
00:13:10.640 But him bringing this up like it's a big negative that pure poly have did something absolutely unprecedented.
00:13:16.560 It was it was nasty and horrible.
00:13:19.620 Do you know what the debate was over?
00:13:21.720 It was over whether there should be upgraded criminal sentencing sentencing for assaulting a pregnant woman and and causing her to miscarry her child.
00:13:31.500 Screw him.
00:13:32.540 Screw him if he's going to say something like that.
00:13:34.420 Oh, I can't believe he reopened the abortion debate because he actually values the life of a pregnant mother and her unborn child.
00:13:41.800 Because that is something that 95 percent of Canadians would not be at all taking issue with the 5 percent of people who literally are so hyper pro-abortion that they support the idea that that should not be anything more than a basic assault.
00:13:55.560 But because we want to make that more than a basic assault to cause it to be a greater crime to cause a pregnant woman to miscarry that that is attacking choice in Canada.
00:14:05.900 This guy, you don't have any morals left and he's trying to take some moral swings at pure poly of while he's basically OK with assaulting pregnant mothers.
00:14:15.580 No, he's an awful human being if he's going to try and pull that.
00:14:18.860 Notice how in this section they will not show you what the bill was about or any text of it.
00:14:23.920 They'll just say he voted in favor of something.
00:14:25.560 Just take our word for it that it was bad.
00:14:27.180 He means right to work legislation, your ability to work a job without having a union middleman tell you how you can work at what hours you have to take, what wages you have to take that you can go and get your own job.
00:14:51.860 That is anti-union, far right, Republican politics, giving people freedom, giving people freedom.
00:15:00.000 That's anti-worker care, farmacare and housing investments. 0.99
00:15:04.060 Eric Paulyev's only priority has been to make deep cuts to programs that help Canadian families so he can cut the taxes of his wealthy friends.
00:15:13.840 Every single having a cash for access fundraiser.
00:15:17.460 That's not a cash for access fundraiser.
00:15:19.380 I know a lot of these like left-wing organizations like The Breach.
00:15:22.020 Again, the funny thing is that I am not at all like what someone would describe as like far right.
00:15:28.640 And the thing is that even like the Conservative Party is pretty careful with which media sources that they quote because they know that the left-wing media will like, you know, take their heads off if they quote rebel, even though rebel's fine.
00:15:40.080 But the thing is that they'll generally avoid it.
00:15:42.020 The left, the liberals and the NDP will cite the most obviously far left, flat-out communist publications and nobody will take issue for it.
00:15:53.060 The Breach, you have press progress there.
00:15:55.000 They'll cite anti-hate.com and just openly anti-conservative organization.
00:16:00.060 They actually don't care about left-wing hatred or anti-Semitism.
00:16:02.500 They will only go after something if it's slightly tinged with conservatism, even if they have to make up what kind of conservatism is involved.
00:16:10.060 It's just could be some random racist person who has no political faction.
00:16:13.160 And they'll say, look at this conservative.
00:16:15.540 And then they'll try and tie them back to the Conservative Party.
00:16:18.440 But the liberals will, will like cite these smear merchants and socialists and they'll never get called out for it.
00:16:24.960 And again, really, this is just whimpering and whining because the Conservatives can actually raise money these days and the liberals can't.
00:16:32.000 What kind of representative is that?
00:16:35.100 Here in Carleton, we need a leader who is ready to make life more fair for everyone.
00:16:42.120 Someone who believes in $10 a day childcare and doesn't call it a slush fund.
00:16:47.240 Someone who will make retirement more secure.
00:16:50.380 The $10 a day childcare thing is flat-out a slush fund.
00:16:53.040 It's a slush fund for liberal allies who are able to access the subsidy money because the $10 a day childcare program makes it almost unaffordable to operate a private business in the daycare childcare sector.
00:17:05.920 If you aren't in the most ideal of locations or like a massive corporate childcare organization, that's going to get more money from the liberal government.
00:17:14.040 For seniors and not cut their benefits.
00:17:17.440 Someone who believes that climate change is real and that we need to take action now for our environment and our economy.
00:17:25.260 My name is Bruce Fangioid and I'm taking on Pierre Poiliev as the liberal candidate for Carleton in the next election.
00:17:32.580 I don't want to go after him too much for his presentation.
00:17:36.080 I'm definitely not the most charismatic man on the planet.
00:17:39.000 But if you're using your hands in a video, don't like crab claw around here.
00:17:44.460 I'm taking on Pierre Poiliev in the next election.
00:17:47.980 Just loosen up the hands, Bruce, even though I think that you're kind of a horrible human being.
00:17:53.300 But whatever.
00:17:54.760 Carleton, I believe that 20 years of Pierre Poiliev is enough.
00:17:59.760 Well, that was the liberals' big pitch.
00:18:04.900 Pierre Poiliev is a nasty, horrible man because he's conservative and he, you know, blah, like vagary.
00:18:12.480 And that's the problem with the liberals.
00:18:14.000 They have nothing but vague accusations these days.
00:18:16.340 And when all you have left is vague accusations, you don't have a real narrative.
00:18:21.240 Narratives need to be like really solid, visionary kind of things that you can tell the Canadian public.
00:18:26.460 This is why we're good and this is why the opposition doesn't get it or they're bad or nasty.
00:18:32.600 And it has to be specific.
00:18:33.520 It has to feel like a very coherent, like, you know, a good way of being able to really sum up the problems of the country or something like that.
00:18:41.640 Or like what, how we're going to take ourselves from here and go and move the country into a higher position.
00:18:47.860 But the liberals don't have that.
00:18:49.300 They have programs.
00:18:50.700 They keep passing more money for more programs that don't work and are then just running on that Pierre Poiliev is going to take away these useless programs.
00:18:57.780 That's it.
00:18:58.280 It's a government on its last legs.
00:19:00.620 They don't really know what their reason to exist is anymore.
00:19:03.460 And so nearly they're just spending our own taxpayer monies trying to bribe us and then slinging mud at Pierre Poiliev saying that he's vaguely far right based on surface level, like, like vague accusation.
00:19:15.360 Anyways, that should be it for me today, guys.
00:19:17.740 I'm going to keep the outro really short.
00:19:19.380 But if you want to donate to my legal fund, it's in the Give, Send, Go link in the description below.
00:19:24.040 We're being sued by a billionaire developer for defamation that he cannot prove.
00:19:28.380 And after more than two and a half years, he's not submitted any evidence for.
00:19:31.660 So if you want to help us out, you can go to that Give, Send, Go link, click on it, donate something.
00:19:36.340 And I deeply appreciate it if you do.
00:19:38.440 Have a good one, guys.