The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Left-Wing YouTubers FAIL in 2025 - Carney has allies online!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here.

00:00:03.220 Although a lot of negative things have happened in the year 2025,

00:00:07.800 one massive victory for the conservative movement in this country

00:00:11.640 has been the utter defeat of Canadian left-wing political YouTube.

00:00:17.440 They were doing pretty well at the start of the year, especially around the federal election.

00:00:22.400 But ever since then, they have completely fallen off the map.

00:00:26.680 I didn't expect to cover this in a video today.

00:00:30.240 This is not something I've been planning on doing.

00:00:32.640 It's not even something I even woke up in the morning wanting to talk about.

00:00:36.760 But I saw a few social media links to certain YouTubers' channels.

00:00:41.520 I checked them out.

00:00:42.560 I'm always curious to see how different YouTubers are doing,

00:00:45.600 especially on the other side of the political spectrum.

00:00:48.340 And what I found was not very good.

00:00:51.140 But it's also hilarious if you're a conservative.

00:00:53.700 There are a lot of conservative or YouTubers on the right in Canada right now.

00:00:59.960 And we all do pretty well.

00:01:02.060 Yeah, there's some channels that are kind of puttering along,

00:01:04.320 maybe because of the format.

00:01:05.520 They haven't really caught a break yet.

00:01:07.200 You know, I hope that they all do well.

00:01:09.600 Eventually, they find their footing and start gaining an audience.

00:01:12.580 But there are tons of conservative channels that have a big audience.

00:01:16.760 I have a pretty good-sized audience.

00:01:18.560 And there are channels multiple times bigger than myself,

00:01:22.320 like The Pleb, like Mr. Sunshine Baby, Jasmine Lane, all these people.

00:01:28.180 But the left, seemingly, it's not just that they haven't really grown at the same rate.

00:01:33.820 They have completely fallen off a cliff.

00:01:37.500 Velma and Louise style, just convertible,

00:01:40.460 falling into a giant crevice and exploding on impact.

00:01:44.120 Let's start off with an example that you guys are going to find funny.

00:01:48.820 And that is one of our favorite journalists, Rachel Gilmore.

00:01:53.020 Now, her channel actually has a bunch of videos that did pretty well.

00:01:57.920 I'm just going to her popular videos.

00:02:00.140 These are like nine months ago, seven months ago,

00:02:02.620 eight, four, 11, eight, seven, 11.

00:02:06.200 You know, it's pretty much everything more than four months ago,

00:02:09.480 she was doing much better in.

00:02:11.620 She was getting like 57,000 views, 53,000, 45,000, 42,000.

00:02:18.400 And even if I go to the latest, if I go back about four months or so,

00:02:22.300 you get 11,000 here, 7.9, 3.9, not so good, 9.1, 42,000, that's pretty good,

00:02:30.440 7.6, 4.4, 4.7.

00:02:33.220 And the problem is, if we actually go to her latest, latest content,

00:02:37.960 because she had a bit of a break almost here,

00:02:40.280 where you can see it goes from 13 days to two months to three months.

00:02:44.560 As of recently, with her, video three hours ago has 406 views,

00:02:50.580 1,200 from a day ago, 1,300 from two days ago,

00:02:54.540 3,400 from three days ago, 1,100 from seven days ago.

00:02:58.520 This channel is dying, and I don't think that Rachel Gilmore

00:03:03.740 has the humility within her to actually turn it around,

00:03:07.820 because then she would have to admit to having a personal flaw,

00:03:11.240 and she doesn't do that sort of thing. 1.00

00:03:13.420 She will never admit that her content is boring and pedantic and self-indulgent.

00:03:19.480 I was just talking to somebody earlier today about this.

00:03:22.920 You could say there are definitely flaws on right-wing Canadian YouTube.

00:03:27.080 Maybe too many YouTubers talk about politics like they're a WWE wrestling commentator.

00:03:33.560 I don't think that's many people,

00:03:35.000 but you can sometimes get a little bit too much tabloidy drama stuff

00:03:39.380 that ends up leaking into political commentary.

00:03:41.680 I don't even think that's exactly a right-wing flaw.

00:03:44.000 It can happen on the left, too.

00:03:45.220 But we're not perfect, is what I'm saying.

00:03:47.820 But the left, I find there's a sort of idea

00:03:53.280 that there are, like, philosopher kings out on a mountain in the woods,

00:03:58.420 and you're going to go out of your way to go watch their content.

00:04:01.640 And then when it turns out that that's not true,

00:04:04.360 the channels just wither and die.

00:04:06.500 There was this Callum guy right here,

00:04:08.800 who I remember started cranking out videos and shorts pretty consistently

00:04:12.600 for a few months back during the election.

00:04:15.700 Some of these things aren't even all that old

00:04:18.020 when you go over to the short section.

00:04:20.660 But he made all these videos of, like,

00:04:23.640 he made these, like, long 20-minute videos

00:04:25.780 of him talking about politics in Canada,

00:04:28.120 and it was getting, like, 47 views, 205, 55,

00:04:32.120 and then the channel just withered and died.

00:04:34.580 His presentation style wasn't even particularly bad.

00:04:38.480 It was just that everything about it

00:04:41.060 was just bloated and overwrought.

00:04:43.580 The actual filming and editing was fine,

00:04:45.960 but the content itself is not actually appealing

00:04:48.800 unless you're a very snarky left-wing millennial

00:04:52.840 or someone from Gen Z.

00:04:55.520 Someone who's actually not doing as bad,

00:04:58.120 but they've kind of been a mini failure to launch,

00:05:01.100 is Laura Babcock.

00:05:02.700 The O Show with Laura Babcock.

00:05:04.260 201 videos on her channel.

00:05:07.160 There's no shorts,

00:05:07.880 so she's not padding her channel views with short videos.

00:05:12.220 But you get 3,300, 5,300, 55, 5,600, 6,500, 34, 66.

00:05:20.140 But this has been going on for a long time.

00:05:22.800 You go back to...

00:05:23.880 When you care about...

00:05:25.420 Actually, watch a video from Laura Babcock.

00:05:27.920 But if you go back to her oldest views,

00:05:29.340 she's been doing this for, like, four years or so,

00:05:32.080 but you could say that that was when she wasn't really full-time.

00:05:36.260 Now she's full-time,

00:05:37.280 but it's basically just been kind of struggling

00:05:39.260 around that kind of mid-thousands mark,

00:05:42.060 and that's pretty much it.

00:05:44.380 Let's go on to somebody else.

00:05:46.560 This one is funny.

00:05:48.400 Dale Smith, who is a freelance journalist

00:05:51.680 who mostly writes for, I think, Canadian Press,

00:05:55.760 so his articles can kind of be syndicated anywhere,

00:05:58.700 he would probably consider himself a big wig

00:06:01.040 of legacy journalism,

00:06:03.240 legacy media commentary and reporting.

00:06:06.400 I think he actually considers himself

00:06:07.920 a straight-up neutral reporter, which is insane.

00:06:10.860 But this guy, with all of his media experience and savvy,

00:06:14.260 has created 314 videos on this channel,

00:06:18.080 and he only has 527 subscribers still.

00:06:21.520 You go back to his oldest videos,

00:06:22.920 and yes, some of these were being made six years ago,

00:06:25.540 so let's discount that stuff.

00:06:27.600 Still, I don't think that's any excuse to fail that hard

00:06:30.080 when you should know a thing or two about the media,

00:06:32.360 but he's a subsidized journalist.

00:06:34.040 He doesn't actually know anything.

00:06:35.220 You go down here, it's from six days ago, 12 days ago,

00:06:39.200 two weeks, three weeks, one month.

00:06:41.400 The highest, these are literally not even breaking 1,000 views.

00:06:45.120 Some of them have like 55 views, 49, 264.

00:06:49.940 His most popular video only has 1,500 views,

00:06:54.780 because you can't force people to consume the content

00:06:58.260 by subsidizing it and putting it on television

00:07:01.080 or having their articles syndicated on every single outlet.

00:07:04.560 Nobody is actually going to consume it.

00:07:07.100 These people, again, see themselves as like philosopher kings

00:07:10.600 up on the mountain,

00:07:11.900 and Canadians are going to hack their way through the jungle 1.00

00:07:14.900 with a machete to come and sit at their feet

00:07:17.620 and listen to their wisdom.

00:07:18.900 And it's just not true.

00:07:21.140 The left in Canada is boring.

00:07:23.300 A lot of their content just is bad.

00:07:26.720 There's no real other way of putting it.

00:07:28.800 Here's another person, True North Eager Beaver Media,

00:07:32.880 who you have, I believe Laura Babcock has him on her show a lot.

00:07:37.860 He actually has 28,000 subscribers.

00:07:40.780 Now, what is his most popular video?

00:07:43.280 That's not too bad.

00:07:44.520 30,000, 23,000, 8,200.

00:07:47.020 So this guy at least demonstrates he can punch above his weight

00:07:51.820 in terms of viewership.

00:07:54.040 You can get more views on videos than he even has subscribers.

00:07:57.420 But recently, you go through this stuff,

00:07:59.520 and there's no chance this guy's been demonetized

00:08:01.920 or he's been somehow, you know, throttled on YouTube.

00:08:05.940 These are woke, very safe channels

00:08:09.240 that put out very safe left-wing opinions.

00:08:12.280 And his most recent videos, 112 views, 36 views, 149, 25, 139, 43.

00:08:20.940 Maybe his format's really the live stream.

00:08:23.840 But if you go to the live stream, it's not better.

00:08:26.700 Hundreds of views only.

00:08:28.600 And you can't say, well, no, no, no,

00:08:29.860 he's mostly on another platform.

00:08:31.760 He's a Spotify show, don't you know, Wyatt?

00:08:35.200 You have 28,000 subscribers on YouTube,

00:08:37.660 and you can't actually pull in very many views.

00:08:39.920 That probably means that the audience watched you for a while.

00:08:44.300 You had a few videos that promised quality.

00:08:47.240 And after that, it became the same boring, meandering, whining

00:08:52.260 about Pierre Polyev and the conservatives

00:08:54.640 and Donald Trump and the Americans.

00:08:57.320 It's why Laura Babcock's show, 1.00

00:08:59.360 probably in the next seven months,

00:09:01.320 is going to be, you know,

00:09:02.980 petering out around 2,000 views, 3,000 views.

00:09:06.060 Frankly, I think some people watch Laura Babcock 1.00

00:09:07.920 out of pure irony.

00:09:10.360 Her show was just hilarious to watch. 1.00

00:09:12.840 She's constantly bugging her eyes out 0.98

00:09:14.880 and acting like it's the end of the world

00:09:16.560 every single time a conservative

00:09:18.220 simply disagrees with Mark Carney.

00:09:21.040 I think I already covered Dale there.

00:09:23.040 We even had, I have a photo of him here

00:09:25.540 just so we can remember him.

00:09:27.740 Do I have it here?

00:09:29.160 Yeah, we have our photo

00:09:30.240 of the great super sleuth, Steve Boots.

00:09:33.620 Remember how this guy was like an up-and-coming,

00:09:38.120 more NDP-coded, left-wing Canadian YouTuber?

00:09:41.980 And he actually could pull off

00:09:43.060 some really high views sometimes.

00:09:45.100 And then the channel started petering out.

00:09:47.880 He just started live-streaming all the time,

00:09:49.840 and all of his content, like Rachel Gilmore's is now,

00:09:53.060 just started being live-streamed clips

00:09:54.600 about him rambling about left-wing philosophy.

00:09:58.040 I once went after him a few times in video responses

00:10:01.780 because he would make these really kind of

00:10:04.880 patronizing videos about why young men

00:10:08.340 are voting conservative and talking about how,

00:10:10.940 you know, well, we need to understand young men,

00:10:13.500 but we don't need to make excuses for them

00:10:15.420 and all this stuff.

00:10:16.360 His own audience brought up the fact

00:10:17.780 that I had made a video response to him

00:10:20.080 that was multiple times more views

00:10:22.280 than his actual original video.

00:10:23.900 And he just told the person,

00:10:25.320 no, we're not talking about Wyatt Claypool on the show.

00:10:27.300 We don't talk, we don't respond to people like that.

00:10:30.640 And then he wonders why he, like, quit the channel,

00:10:33.400 deleted all of his videos to go back to teaching.

00:10:35.680 No doubt the school basically required him

00:10:38.220 to delete all of the content

00:10:39.860 if he's gonna come back and be a teacher

00:10:41.420 because some of his stuff was wildly far left.

00:10:45.560 Like, just, no matter what the issue was,

00:10:49.320 capitalism is bad, Israel is bad, 1.00

00:10:51.780 white people are bad, religion is bad, 1.00

00:10:54.380 that was everything.

00:10:55.060 And you're gonna let this guy teach

00:10:56.520 in a classroom in Saskatchewan?

00:10:58.700 You know, more power to him if he's a good teacher

00:11:00.940 and he just sticks their curriculum.

00:11:02.500 I'm not trying to slag the guy too hard here.

00:11:04.840 But the problem with the left wing in Canada

00:11:08.480 is that other than the subsidized media

00:11:11.520 where you can get people to watch

00:11:13.340 simply because they're used to watching

00:11:14.820 and it's on TV,

00:11:16.300 nobody's actually going out of their way

00:11:18.600 to watch any of this stuff.

00:11:20.500 The CBC's viewership has been pretty much

00:11:23.620 going down consistently for decades

00:11:26.040 to the point where they keep setting themselves

00:11:28.640 even lower goals for what they try to achieve

00:11:31.840 in terms of media market capture

00:11:33.700 and they undershoot even what they undershoot.

00:11:36.500 So you would assume that the CBC

00:11:38.340 would want to get more viewership every year.

00:11:41.840 No, each year they literally lower

00:11:44.280 the amount of media capture

00:11:45.680 that they want to achieve

00:11:46.780 because they know they're going down

00:11:48.040 and oftentimes they undershoot even that.

00:11:51.680 It's so bad.

00:11:53.780 And now just to finish this video off,

00:11:55.980 I just want to talk about this clip

00:11:58.960 from Power in Politics

00:12:00.380 and why nobody likes liberal media.

00:12:05.000 It's just an echo chamber.

00:12:07.160 Now I'm conservative

00:12:07.960 and I tell you conservative opinions,

00:12:09.940 but I mean in terms of the liberal mainstream media

00:12:12.520 pretending to be objective.

00:12:14.340 Nobody likes it because of stuff like this.

00:12:16.640 It will be a few minutes,

00:12:18.260 but mind you,

00:12:19.460 the first guy who's about to talk

00:12:20.580 is a liberal on the panel

00:12:21.720 and the second guy they will go to

00:12:23.860 is the conservative.

00:12:25.160 ...head space than a year ago.

00:12:28.120 All the liberals you talk to

00:12:29.160 in these year-end conversations

00:12:30.360 are like that survivor contest

00:12:31.920 that won the challenge of week 10

00:12:33.600 and they get to eat good food for the first time.

00:12:35.940 What are you watching for your party for next year?

00:12:38.060 Well, I mean, there's a saying in politics,

00:12:40.020 a week is an eternity, a year.

00:12:42.260 This is incredibly different space for the liberals.

00:12:45.940 There was a saying during the pandemic

00:12:48.480 that governments were building the plane while flying it.

00:12:52.480 I think the liberals changed pilots,

00:12:54.840 but it ended up being a very, very different looking plane.

00:12:57.960 And a lot of responses to things

00:13:00.880 that have been points of criticism

00:13:03.560 towards the liberals for a long time

00:13:05.700 around things like the country's ability to build,

00:13:10.520 the country's ability to recognize

00:13:12.820 that the economy has had a major threat

00:13:16.520 thanks to the President of the United States.

00:13:19.160 So incredible change.

00:13:22.560 A lot of the things that we were hearing...

00:13:25.060 Sir, what is he talking about, incredible change?

00:13:27.640 Because, yes, he is in fact trying to say

00:13:30.000 that there has been incredible change.

00:13:31.940 The plane was built while it was flying.

00:13:33.800 It looks completely different

00:13:35.060 now that they've gone from Justin Trudeau to Mark Carney.

00:13:38.360 Has it...

00:13:39.960 I keep hearing that it's a new government,

00:13:42.000 but, yeah, he is the liberal hack on the panel,

00:13:44.320 so he's going to say hacky liberal things.

00:13:46.580 But can you give one point

00:13:48.340 about how the actual plane is different?

00:13:52.640 Other than Mark Carney leading instead of Justin Trudeau,

00:13:56.080 what philosophical change

00:13:57.740 has taken place inside the liberal party?

00:14:00.240 He can point to,

00:14:01.240 oh, well, they got rid of the carbon tax.

00:14:02.960 Yeah, but that was only because

00:14:04.660 the conservatives effectively put them in a corner

00:14:06.600 and they had to do it.

00:14:08.100 That was the only reason the liberals actually did that

00:14:10.580 and then they doubled the industrial carbon tax.

00:14:13.120 On other issues, yeah,

00:14:14.540 I guess he's technically lowered income taxes

00:14:16.580 by 1% for the first $50,000 of people's income

00:14:20.140 because he kind of had to promise it to get re-elected.

00:14:23.040 But philosophical change?

00:14:25.640 This is like a brand new face of the liberal party?

00:14:27.940 I don't think so.

00:14:28.980 You know, in 2024, I spoke about how when I'd leave Ottawa,

00:14:32.820 people would tell me very clearly if they, you know,

00:14:34.940 if they knew, you know, identified liberal

00:14:36.820 or they knew us from this panel

00:14:38.220 that they weren't very happy with Justin Trudeau,

00:14:40.360 but they had concerns about Pierre Polyef.

00:14:42.680 Well, the election of 2025 really, you know,

00:14:46.920 gave us proof of that.

00:14:48.920 Yeah.

00:14:50.920 Even that's kind of an overwrought point.

00:14:52.760 I get what he's saying,

00:14:54.040 but the problem is,

00:14:54.840 is that it's not like the conservatives

00:14:56.440 fell in the polls very hard.

00:14:58.860 They were at around 43% on average in the polls

00:15:01.720 before Justin Trudeau dropped out

00:15:03.840 as the liberal party leader.

00:15:05.460 As the highest the conservatives got,

00:15:07.320 I think it was like 47% in one poll,

00:15:09.760 but that was one poll.

00:15:11.300 That's an outlier by definition

00:15:12.780 if only one poll was showing them that high.

00:15:14.780 They were maybe at 43 on average

00:15:17.140 and they ended up achieving 41.2

00:15:20.580 or 41.3 in the election.

00:15:22.660 That's not much of a fall.

00:15:24.420 It wasn't like people really had concerns

00:15:26.180 about Pierre Polyef,

00:15:28.280 is that they had concerns about Justin Trudeau.

00:15:30.780 Trudeau was swapped out.

00:15:32.200 Trump ended up creating an issue

00:15:34.100 that gave Mark Carney

00:15:35.860 and the liberal incumbent government a big boost.

00:15:38.360 And because Jagmeet Singh was still leading the NDP,

00:15:41.180 the liberals disproportionately got that NDP vote

00:15:44.400 and they got it right in the right ridings

00:15:46.120 that they needed to get those NDP votes.

00:15:48.340 And so they ended up overcoming the conservatives

00:15:50.820 barely by 8,000 votes

00:15:53.560 in the closest 20 ridings combined.

00:15:56.440 It wasn't exactly like a big repudiation of Pierre Polyev,

00:16:00.120 but this is what Greg McKecker

00:16:01.680 and other liberals want to keep implying,

00:16:04.440 is that Polyev's done,

00:16:05.780 people don't like him,

00:16:06.840 trying to demoralize conservatives

00:16:08.340 and saying you can't run him again

00:16:09.580 because he barely lost the last election

00:16:11.980 when the liberals were given

00:16:13.500 pretty much every artificial advantage possible.

00:16:16.040 So Fred, it's a completely different political dynamic

00:16:18.840 as, you know, parliament shuts down on the...

00:16:20.880 So we're going from Greg McKecker

00:16:23.500 and who is a partisan liberal hack.

00:16:25.720 That's fine, he's supposed to be a partisan liberal hack.

00:16:28.600 We are now going to the conservative representative

00:16:31.160 on this panel, Fred DeLaurie.

00:16:33.880 Now, this is what the CBC has

00:16:36.660 as a conservative on their panel show.

00:16:39.100 Your winds down in 2025,

00:16:40.540 I mean, what do you think is the big thing

00:16:42.560 for the liberals looking ahead to 2026?

00:16:44.500 I mean, the hunt, as we speak,

00:16:46.240 as we speak, because this is taped,

00:16:48.080 there's still the one seat short of a majority.

00:16:50.020 You know, I guess that's the big target for them.

00:16:52.320 Well, yeah, they're in a situation right now

00:16:53.840 in a minority parliament

00:16:54.700 that they're, you know,

00:16:55.820 they're so close to that majority.

00:16:57.600 But going back to a year ago to Justin Trudeau

00:17:00.660 and the decade that he was prime minister,

00:17:02.980 like, this is not the liberal party of Justin Trudeau.

00:17:05.700 This is a complete shift.

00:17:07.100 And that's the...

00:17:08.040 What is he talking about?

00:17:10.080 Like, this is...

00:17:11.500 That is the most Fred DeLaurie thing

00:17:13.520 I've ever heard in my life

00:17:14.480 because, remember,

00:17:15.160 this man was the campaign manager

00:17:17.080 for Aaron O'Toole in 2021.

00:17:19.880 Oh, this is a totally different party.

00:17:22.580 Totally different party.

00:17:23.840 All the faces are pretty much the same.

00:17:25.900 Mark Carney was even the economic advisor

00:17:27.860 to Justin Trudeau.

00:17:28.980 He's not even exactly a new face.

00:17:31.680 That is why he ended up getting grilled

00:17:34.280 in committee meetings by Pierre Polyev

00:17:36.580 in, I think, like, 2020, 2021, 2022,

00:17:40.200 one of those years

00:17:41.100 because he was one of the people responsible

00:17:43.800 for the economic direction

00:17:45.440 that Canada was going in.

00:17:47.500 And when you look at all of the year-end interviews

00:17:50.360 with Prime Minister Mark Carney,

00:17:52.620 he can only highlight that,

00:17:54.140 you know, while we had a tough budget

00:17:56.300 that we had to put through

00:17:57.340 and we maintained all the spending

00:17:59.040 on the programs that Justin Trudeau created,

00:18:02.240 you know, we have the dental program

00:18:04.040 and we have the school lunch program

00:18:05.680 and we have all these auto subsidies

00:18:07.360 and whatnot.

00:18:08.580 Everything that Carney was celebrating

00:18:10.400 were things that already existed

00:18:12.080 before he got into office.

00:18:13.340 And then he celebrates his very tiny tax cut,

00:18:16.000 which is offset by his doubling

00:18:17.440 of the industrial carbon tax

00:18:18.860 and the new clean fuel standard

00:18:20.680 and all this stuff.

00:18:22.140 No, like, this is not

00:18:23.420 a substantially different government,

00:18:24.760 but Fred DeLore here,

00:18:26.320 who's supposed to be the conservative,

00:18:27.580 is just going along with the talking point.

00:18:30.000 Resiliency in the brand of the Liberal Party

00:18:31.760 is fascinating that they're able to shift

00:18:33.900 like that.

00:18:34.360 Like, they don't hold values

00:18:35.640 that are dear to themselves.

00:18:37.320 What values have they gotten rid of?

00:18:39.780 I know if you talk to Stephen Gilbeau,

00:18:41.840 he'll act like they're failing the climate now

00:18:43.740 because they're not being as aggressive

00:18:44.940 as he would be.

00:18:46.060 But it's not like Carney's gone

00:18:48.280 in a different direction.

00:18:49.360 He has maybe slowed the car down

00:18:51.260 a little bit compared to Trudeau,

00:18:52.760 but that's it.

00:18:53.420 And it's more so, again,

00:18:54.700 he was forced into the corner

00:18:55.940 by the conservatives and had to do it.

00:18:57.920 He's like, oh my goodness,

00:18:58.840 the ability for this government

00:19:00.100 to shift and pivot on its feet

00:19:02.440 is remarkable.

00:19:03.140 No, it hasn't pivoted at all.

00:19:06.480 The only idea,

00:19:07.980 the only people saying that they've pivoted

00:19:10.200 are the Liberal Party

00:19:11.260 and hacked commentators

00:19:12.960 like Fred DeLorean and Greg McEachern.

00:19:15.280 And that is sometimes

00:19:16.920 in the electoral system a benefit,

00:19:18.700 but also a risk.

00:19:19.660 Where does that go in the future?

00:19:21.080 Can they hold whatever coalition

00:19:23.080 that they currently have together

00:19:24.780 when you're not really rooted in anything?

00:19:26.380 Well, they're rooted in holding on to power

00:19:29.300 and surviving, right, Mel?

00:19:30.720 I mean, this is the criticism.

00:19:32.660 That's all we need to do.

00:19:33.760 We don't need to hear

00:19:34.400 from the NDP lady on the panel.

00:19:36.160 I cannot stand power in politics.

00:19:38.520 It's great content

00:19:39.400 because it's great to hear

00:19:40.660 how the legacy media

00:19:42.160 is breaking down the news.

00:19:43.720 But my goodness,

00:19:45.100 just people spewing pablum.

00:19:47.440 Nothing to say.

00:19:48.420 It's just the most obvious

00:19:51.840 government talking points.

00:19:53.380 Wow, this is a new government.

00:19:54.860 Wow, they've shifted on a dime

00:19:56.140 and gone in a new direction.

00:19:57.480 It was like that letter to the editor

00:19:58.840 I read yesterday on the show

00:20:01.060 from the Globe and Mail

00:20:02.080 where a guy was gushing

00:20:03.460 about the new trajectory.

00:20:05.240 We're flying at new heights.

00:20:07.740 We've reached new heights

00:20:08.700 that I didn't even imagine

00:20:09.700 that we would reach.

00:20:11.340 I had somebody on X even point out

00:20:13.680 the guy who wrote that letter

00:20:15.640 to the editor

00:20:16.380 is a semi-retired,

00:20:18.420 member of a consulting

00:20:20.040 communications firm

00:20:21.500 that gets hundreds of thousands

00:20:23.240 of dollars

00:20:23.860 from the liberal government

00:20:25.260 every year in contracts.

00:20:27.360 Oh, oh, he thinks that

00:20:28.620 Carney's flying at new heights

00:20:30.280 as soon as the firm

00:20:31.500 he's still a part of

00:20:32.340 is receiving more money than ever?

00:20:34.720 Wow, who could have seen it coming?

00:20:36.880 But anyways,

00:20:38.020 that should be it for me today, guys.

00:20:40.360 Thank you all for watching.

00:20:42.200 If you can, it's great.

00:20:43.480 If you like the video,

00:20:44.760 subscribe, share the video,

00:20:46.700 leave a comment,

00:20:47.340 and join the channel membership

00:20:48.900 if you want to help

00:20:49.740 sustain the channel

00:20:50.800 and make it less reliant

00:20:52.340 on the YouTube algorithm.

00:20:54.780 But until next time,

00:20:55.980 I will see you all later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - December 31, 2025

Left-Wing YouTubers FAIL in 2025 - Carney has allies online!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript