The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Leftist attacks on Poilievre keep getting more INSANE!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I often like to spotlight the videos that left-wing TikTokers

00:00:06.420 make on this show to show the unfiltered arguments from the left against Pierre Polyev and the

00:00:11.860 conservatives and demonstrate how empty and shallow they are. These people are full of

00:00:17.140 anti-conservative smugness. They don't have good arguments, half the time they're just making

00:00:21.840 things up or completely misinterpreting the facts, but they are so self-confident that they

00:00:27.120 have never been wrong in their entire lives. So I want to go through some of the recent stuff I

00:00:32.360 found with you guys today to build your confidence that no, you absolutely are correct for voting

00:00:38.020 conservative. These people cannot come up with anything to actually argue against you voting

00:00:42.960 conservative other than the conservatives are not leftists. But before I get into the first video,

00:00:48.540 guys, just a reminder, if you like my federal election coverage, make sure to like this video.

00:00:53.400 If you're not yet subscribed, hit the subscribe button and leave a comment on the topic of the

00:00:58.300 video today. It helps us in the algorithm and I do like to go and read through what people are saying.

00:01:03.800 Anyways, so let's jump into our first video from one of our favorites, Frank Dominic, a man often wrong

00:01:11.880 but never in doubt of himself and who I hear is a school teacher, but you'd get me fooled because he

00:01:18.520 seems more so like he's just professionally impressed with himself all the time. Take it

00:01:23.500 away, Frank. Then there was former conservative MP Candace Burgeon who has been seen proudly wearing

00:01:28.020 a MAGA hat and other conservative MPs have also been associated either with MAGA or the alt-right

00:01:32.700 German AFD party for both. Leslie Lewis is an example of this. Her and- Oh yeah, Leslie Lewis,

00:01:37.660 probably a massive racist. And two other conservative MPs met with members of the AFD, a political party

00:01:43.580 which recently had to dissolve its youth wing for being too extremist. And to be clear, the AFD is

00:01:48.440 not the German conservative party, which was formerly led by Angela Merkel. The AFD is-

00:01:53.300 Angela Merkel's party isn't exactly the conservative party either. It's kind of like a center-center-right

00:01:58.760 party. That's all you can really say about the CDU.

00:02:01.720 It's an extreme far-right group that conservatives in Germany have completely ruled out working with.

00:02:06.460 What do they actually believe, Frank? What does the AFD believe that is extreme right?

00:02:13.440 They're against mass immigration? They're against random migrants from Syria showing up in their 0.99

00:02:18.340 borders? He actually has to make an argument here. So, so far, Leslie Lewis is a bad person for having

00:02:25.280 been seen with an AFD politician who here probably have later condemned as being not a good person. I think

00:02:32.240 he was hyperbolic with it. I understand why he said it. But what is the actual argument here?

00:02:37.280 Leslie Lewis and two other conservative MPs took a photo with that AFD MEP. And then what? Because apparently

00:02:45.620 he just wants to do a bunch of guilt by association nonsense where he hasn't even proven one of the parties

00:02:51.280 is a guilty party yet. Because, like, I guess they met once and that means that Leslie Lewis has contracted

00:02:58.340 all of the sins of the AFD. And this is why it's so shocking that Pierre's conservatives have

00:03:04.560 absolutely no issues being associated with them. No, they literally condemn them. Polly have even got

00:03:10.340 criticism from the right for condemning them because it was a bit of a hyperbolic condemnation.

00:03:16.280 Leslie Lewis was also at a recent ARC convention in London, a far-right anti-climate gathering.

00:03:22.380 No, it isn't. It literally isn't. There's, like, mainstream conservative party figures from the UK there,

00:03:27.480 like conservative leader Kemi Badenoch. That's patently absurd.

00:03:31.920 Organized by everyone's favorite Canadian, Jordan Peterson. She chaired a panel with a former Trump advisor,

00:03:36.680 Scott Atlas. Leslie Lewis has also been hinted at by Pierre to be in his cabinet. Great pick.

00:03:41.480 Then there's a conservative candidate for Kitchener, Matt Strauss. Matt has said some questionable things

00:03:45.660 on Twitter recently, including, like, during the pandemic, asking if he could get refugee status in Florida.

00:03:51.420 Oh my goodness, it's a joke about how draconian the Canadian rules were around COVID lockdowns.

00:03:56.480 Matt Strauss, being a doctor, who is critical of lockdown policies and mandates because he argued

00:04:02.420 that it actually didn't help. Even away from just the rights and freedoms perspective,

00:04:07.480 he made the argument this is all deeply counterproductive. He's a very reasonable person.

00:04:12.540 Why would he ask that? It might have something to do with the fact that he's pretty anti-vax.

00:04:16.420 And he doesn't seem... He's actually not anti-vax. I know, Matt Strauss,

00:04:19.300 he is not an anti-vaxxer. Like, yeah, he's against mandates because you should be able to choose what you

00:04:23.800 take. He's absolutely not. Frank is just lying about him because he doesn't have an argument.

00:04:28.100 I think COVID was that big of a deal, considering that he said he'd rather give his children COVID-19

00:04:31.680 than a McDonald's Happy Meal. Yeah, and because, as you see on the chart,

00:04:35.080 because nobody under the age of eight died of COVID effectively.

00:04:38.680 That's not really the weirdest thing he said either. And his anti-vax claims were such a problem

00:04:42.280 that Queen's University dismissed him, with him saying that Queen's tried to cancel him. Well,

00:04:46.300 Twitter very proudly pronounced they were going to be funding his lawsuit against Queen's.

00:04:49.660 X is proud to fund a lawsuit filed by Dr. Matthew Strauss, an Ontario critical care physician and

00:04:53.960 professor, against his former employer, Queen's University. What is the actual argument here

00:04:59.300 that Frank Dominic is attempting to make? He doesn't even attempt an argument. He just says,

00:05:05.220 you know, X is funding a lawsuit against Queen's University for Matt Strauss's wrongful

00:05:10.580 dismissal. And I guess that's bad because I have just said he's an anti-vaxxer with no evidence.

00:05:16.500 No evidence, by the way. But, you know, Leslie Lewis once talked to the AFD, so we know Leslie

00:05:23.840 Lewis is a white supremacist. If we know anything in this world, it's that Leslie Lewis is a white

00:05:30.620 nationalist. So let's move on to the next one. This one's about Joe Rogan and the Conservative

00:05:36.540 Party, because apparently Joe Rogan is a big figure in this election for the Conservatives.

00:05:41.000 There's also Joe Rogan. While the famous podcaster isn't MAGA, he's also called Pierre very smart and

00:05:46.360 a common sense guy. Oh my goodness. String up Pierre. Kill Pierre. Joe Rogan once said something

00:05:53.900 nice about him. Joe Rogan, everyone's favorite fascist. You know, the guy who is a libertarian 0.78

00:06:00.260 MMA commentator and former fighter who hosts a podcast where he just talks to random people.

00:06:05.060 Now we know that Polyev is a dangerous man who needs to be stopped because Joe Rogan said something

00:06:10.340 about him. And has also many times called Canada a communist country, including a profanity-filled

00:06:15.380 rant where he called Canada the 51st state. And it... Oh my goodness. The worst thing that's ever

00:06:21.120 happened. That's up there with like the things that Idi Amin did is Joe Rogan saying 51st state

00:06:27.760 is a joke about Canada. In multiple instances, accused Canada of being communist. It was a very

00:06:33.200 stunning display of language. He also said we don't have free speech in Canada, but why don't you tell

00:06:37.520 out to all the alt-right trolls in my comment section who are constantly demanding that I be

00:06:41.620 fired. Kind of seems like they have the free speech to continue to harass me and I have the free speech

00:06:45.760 to keep making videos. But we... Um, nobody's ever actually gone after Frank Graves, uh, Frank, uh,

00:06:52.920 Dominic. I think I accidentally called him Frank Graves there for a bit. But nobody's ever gone after

00:06:56.860 Frank Dominic's ability to speak freely. Parents at his own school had complained that he is teaching

00:07:03.900 socialist type concepts as well as like gender theory in the classroom unsolicitedly to their 0.61

00:07:10.900 kids. And then he claims, well, it's part of the curriculum, which it's really not. He is really

00:07:16.400 stretching the definition of what the curriculum means so that he can go on his TikTok rants in

00:07:20.820 front of children while being paid by taxpayers. That's what people have a problem with. Just as if

00:07:26.640 I was working for the government, if I was in like the prosecutor's office, if I was working for like,

00:07:33.580 you know, Canada border services, if I was working at parliament as a nonpartisan employee, yeah, I

00:07:40.100 should be fired if I was doing this show at the same time. You can't do that. But yeah, again, I don't

00:07:47.280 see the argument here from, from Frank Dominic. Where, when are we getting to an argument? I got

00:07:53.380 another one right here. I'm going to queue up. This one is about how Pierre Polyev is apparently very

00:07:58.200 scared of the media. Yeah, Pierre Polyev, I never understand this argument. Pierre Polyev is scared of

00:08:04.760 the media. The guy who also keeps getting accused of bullying the media is scared of them. It's crazy how

00:08:11.220 much Pierre Polyev is hiding from the media. And we literally have the numbers to back that up. With

00:08:15.220 Stuart Benson of the Hill Times noting that Pierre has taken the least amount of questions out of all the major

00:08:19.140 party leaders by a wide margin. Under over what period of time during the election? He's been

00:08:26.960 extremely open with the media up till now. He limits media questions because he's on a tight schedule and

00:08:32.980 does far more events than Mark Carney. And by the way, when you actually hear these media questions,

00:08:37.860 they're absurd. And I do not blame him for not taking a dozen questions from every single CBC affiliate.

00:08:43.580 In the first two weeks of the campaign, he took 65 questions with the liberals taking 148 and the

00:08:48.740 NDP doing 208. And it's crazy just how many days they only took four questions. They are really

00:08:54.340 keeping a muzzle and a leash on journalists. And yeah, there are... A muzzle and a leash. So in the last

00:09:00.080 video, Frank Dominic accuses his critics of wanting to crack down on his free speech for criticizing him.

00:09:07.240 And then he is now saying it is putting a muzzle on journalists to say we're just doing four

00:09:12.300 questions this press conference. Oh my goodness, a muzzle has been placed on the camp on the

00:09:16.500 journalists because there were four questions offered at a very fast press conference event.

00:09:21.320 Days where Carney takes no questions, but on average, he's taking 10 questions per day,

00:09:24.980 which is over double what Pierre is doing. And Singh is doing everything in his power to get in the face

00:09:28.860 of media to get attention from Canadians, which is... And no one cares about who he is because he has

00:09:33.240 nothing to offer. It's a good thing. We want our politicians to be out there. We want our politicians to be

00:09:37.020 answering questions. And Pierre is almost exclusively getting questions from local or independent

00:09:41.300 journalists, which you might think is a good thing, but let me explain why he's doing it.

00:09:44.380 Places like CTV, Global News, CBC, those are established journalists for the most part who

00:09:49.340 are pretty strong in the questions that they ask. Think back to that Apple interview. The person who

00:09:53.540 interviewed Pierre for that, he didn't really know what he was doing. He wasn't trained to interview

00:09:57.240 the leader of a federal party. That man... What? Okay, the man in the Apple video talking to

00:10:04.820 Pierre Polyev. I do not know his name, but I remember the reporting around him at the time because

00:10:09.160 there was this left-wing conspiracy that the man was an actor paid by Polyev to ask him an absurd

00:10:14.980 question so he could dunk on him. That man was a veteran journalist, has worked at many Oitslets.

00:10:20.760 You could even tell from the man's age he was not doing a cub reporter gig. He's not like some 23-year-old

00:10:26.600 he's getting his first job. That man had been a journalist for a long time. But now Frank has just

00:10:32.280 made up the idea that that man was just underqualified, and that's why Polyev bested him.

00:10:38.000 Polyev's best moments are him on CTV News or CP24 going after the host for trying to get him to agree

00:10:46.740 that there are more than two genders. That was CP24 CTV News. A bunch of his other best moments were

00:10:54.000 about him going after like CBC journalists asking him ridiculous questions when he was at like a PEI

00:10:59.800 gas station in late 2023 or early 2024. He's had a lot of good moments involving the legacy media.

00:11:06.560 He's never really shied away. The difference is that we're in an election period where the media

00:11:11.360 has proven that they are willing to just train as many guns on Polyev at a time and just blast away 0.96

00:11:17.040 at him for nonsense. So obviously he's limiting the amount of questions. Ask me a real question.

00:11:22.880 Don't throw mud. Just boil it down to four questions. And guess what? The other media can still use the

00:11:29.020 footage of him answering a question from another journalist at those press conferences in their

00:11:33.180 own reports. If anything, Carney was actually stupid to take so many questions because during the Paul 0.97

00:11:37.840 Chang controversy, he answered the same question like 10 times in a row, which was great for 1.00

00:11:42.960 conservatives to have all this footage of him standing by Paul Chang. But if Carney was smart,

00:11:47.660 he would have said, no, you only get, we only have one question per subject and we're moving on.

00:11:54.580 And Pierre mopped the floor with him. Pierre made quick work of him. He did that on purpose to show

00:11:58.420 strength. And it's the same thing here. When he goes to independent media, he's going to people

00:12:02.280 that he know are going to give him softball questions. When he goes to local media, he's

00:12:05.380 going to people that he knows that he can steamroll over with Pierre having given global news five

00:12:09.280 whole questions, which is a huge amount, but he actually gave three to just Brian Lilly of the

00:12:13.840 Toronto sun, which is equal to the total number of questions given to CTV news, the Canadian press

00:12:17.920 and the Francophone press and CBC, the latter of whom has not been given a question since March 27th.

00:12:23.700 Pierre is completely ignoring one. Yeah. Cause he wants to defund them because they are a waste of

00:12:27.920 taxpayer money. The largest media providers in our country. Why are they large? Cause they're

00:12:31.780 given $1.4 billion a year. They're not actually large. They have not earned any of their largesse.

00:12:37.300 And it's cause he's scared. He's terrified of journalists. He's terrified of accountability.

00:12:40.460 And he's terrified that he's going to say something to make his poll numbers drop even further.

00:12:43.560 I don't know about you, but I prefer a prime minister who can actually talk to the media and

00:12:46.720 be accountable to their actions and their words. Has this man seen Jagmeet Singh actually talk to the

00:12:53.380 media? Remember in the lead up to this election where he kept getting questions about the no

00:12:58.440 confidence vote and he would fumble all over himself and spaghetti would start falling out of

00:13:02.600 his pockets. He's like bumbling around so much. Just didn't know what to say. Looked like a complete

00:13:07.720 idiot up there. Mark Carney, he is the um and ah machine. That man makes more ums and ahs than the U.S. 1.00

00:13:14.600 Treasury prints money. That guy is terrible in front of cameras. Polly have, have you ever seen him

00:13:21.140 really whiff a question? There is one question I know that he had a bad answer to during this

00:13:26.500 entire election that I've seen. And it was about nominations because naturally I think the

00:13:30.320 conservatives have not done a good job posting good nominations. But other than that, he's usually

00:13:35.900 pretty good. And we're even going to get into other video makers as we go on here who are going to

00:13:41.760 criticize Polly have because, well, he's too smooth and snarky with the media. Does a man being smooth

00:13:48.680 and snarky sound like he's someone who is deeply terrified of what's being asked of him? Here's

00:13:54.340 another one of another one from Frank Dominic talking about the Chinese Communist Party. And

00:13:59.940 I just want to see, does he actually attack Mark Carney for this or is he going to somehow make

00:14:04.260 it about the conservatives? By the way, I don't preview any of these videos. I want to watch them

00:14:08.840 for the first time with you guys. So let's see how he uses this topic where in the header he talks

00:14:14.480 about the CCP and Carney. Did you know that Mark Carney is being supported by the Chinese Communist 0.91

00:14:18.580 Party? If you've heard that in the last few days, you might want to clean up your algorithm. Here's

00:14:22.140 the long short of it. A report came out that basically said that there is some foreign

00:14:24.940 interference happening. One of the largest news groups on WeChat, which is basically WhatsApp in

00:14:28.900 China, is promoting Mark Carney. Or are they? Because the report itself says that there are both positive

00:14:33.980 and negative messages about Carney. So what is actually happening? What's actually happening is that

00:14:40.100 they are promoting Mark Carney. Sam Cooper has gone over this. Everyone else who has reported on it says,

00:14:45.480 yes, there are negative things that are reported about Mark Carney. But the overall narrative is that Mark

00:14:52.200 Carney is a very smart and intelligent man, and he is very good at dealing with Donald Trump. You're just

00:14:58.140 mixing in ambiguity by saying, you know, that they've said some things wrong. It would be like saying that

00:15:03.860 I'm not a pro-Polyev channel because I have said negative things about Polyev and Conservatives

00:15:09.420 before. I've even just mentioned one right now in this video that I don't think they dealt with

00:15:14.120 nominations properly. Way too many picking and choosing favorites rather than just letting the

00:15:18.600 nomination play out. Way too many appointments. But if you were to come over to someone and say,

00:15:23.240 well, Wyatt's not pro-Polyev. He said some critical things about him before. He said critical

00:15:27.760 things about the Conservative Party. That person should laugh at you. I am obviously a pro-Conservative

00:15:32.800 channel. But now Frank Dominic here and other people on the left are going to pretend that

00:15:38.320 it's ambiguous whether or not this WeChat scandal was actually a problem or not, or whether they

00:15:44.760 were really supporting Carney. And it was absurd the media headlines that came out of this. Oh,

00:15:50.900 there is a pro-Beijing media outlet that is targeting Carney. And when they meant targeting,

00:15:55.860 they meant targeting how great his resume is. It was the most absurd headline I've ever seen.

00:16:00.140 It's a complete reversal of meaning. Foreign state actors like Russia and China don't really

00:16:05.440 care about one political party or another, except when it comes to Trump, because obviously Russia

00:16:09.900 prefers Trump and China doesn't like him. But in... Okay, that's extremely arguable, considering that

00:16:16.260 do you know who funded Ukraine before the Russian-Ukrainian war started? It was Trump. You know

00:16:23.480 who cut off funding to the Ukrainians and didn't give them any military support until the war started?

00:16:27.920 Joe Biden. But Frank Dominic, I would never accuse him of actually knowing anything about foreign

00:16:32.820 policy, so I'll just move on here. In Canada, it really doesn't make a difference. None of the

00:16:36.540 political leaders are that insane that it would make that much of a benefit for China to support one

00:16:40.100 over the other. Has this man not read the Hogue report or has he never heard the Nisekopp report

00:16:47.740 going over foreign interference from China? They were exclusively helping liberal candidates.

00:16:52.980 The only liberal candidate they attacked was former liberal Kevin Vuong, who actually never even sat as a

00:16:59.880 liberal in parliament because the Chinese, like the CCP basically targeted him, smeared him with a fake

00:17:05.780 sexual assault story in order to get Justin Trudeau to drop him. The problem is that they dropped him

00:17:11.060 past the point they could actually remove him as the candidate. He somehow won the election anyways.

00:17:15.440 That was the only liberal they targeted. An anti-CCP liberal. All of the liberals, all the people that the

00:17:21.380 CCP pro-Beijing front group supported were liberals. It was people like Paul Chang. It was people like

00:17:27.320 Han Dong. Heather Ma. There was that guy in Vancouver something, Baines. All of them were, the only liberals

00:17:34.160 were supported by the CCP.

00:17:35.980 What foreign actors in China and Russia are attempting to do is to sow discord. And the people who on this app

00:17:41.120 are screaming about how Mark Carney is being supported by China, they are now doing the bidding 1.00

00:17:45.180 of China. Congratulations, you played yourself. The goal is to de-state. 0.97

00:17:48.840 How did we? You played yourself by showing that Mark Carney has very clear connections to the CCP,

00:17:55.260 gets the economic advisor job in the liberal government, and then immediately goes to Beijing

00:18:00.180 and gets a massive loan for Brookfield Asset Management. Like, I think it was like a billion dollar

00:18:06.880 loan. He has been seen hobnobbing with CCP front groups and pro-Beijing organizations, organizations

00:18:14.220 who advocate for the annexation of Taiwan into mainland China. He was defending Paul Chang after

00:18:21.580 saying that Zhou Tei should be arrested and brought to the Chinese consulate for a bounty.

00:18:25.940 He has now replaced Paul Chang after defending him for an entire day with another former cop who

00:18:31.900 is also tied in with CCP front groups.

00:18:36.880 All the people who were involved in foreign interference in the Hogue report, who the Hogue 0.99

00:18:40.360 report kind of lets off the hook by pretending that they're too stupid to realize that they 0.99

00:18:44.540 were engaging with CCP front groups, they're all liberals. It's obvious, but Frank Graves, 0.99

00:18:49.960 it's this fake ambiguity. Well, can we really know that they want the liberals? Well, they do this

00:18:54.700 to sow discord. It's such a stupid, cowardly narrative. 1.00

00:18:58.800 Stabilize and make it hard for us to have political conversations. The goal is to make us unstable. 1.00

00:19:03.060 And we should definitely be worried about foreign interference. But when the report basically says

00:19:06.120 this has a zero percent impact on our election or the outcome, we should not be screaming about it

00:19:10.160 as if it's this massive thing where Mark Carney is being supported by a foreign government because

00:19:13.860 it's not happening.

00:19:15.200 But it is happening. And any report saying that there is a zero percent chance it's going to

00:19:19.600 affect things is lying. There is a reason why they had to have a press conference at parliament

00:19:25.400 about the interference that's going on to warn people. You don't warn people about something

00:19:29.680 that is not going to have an effect.

00:19:31.000 But you know what is happening? Have you ever noticed that the Toronto Sun, the National

00:19:34.940 Post and the other companies owned by Post Media only ever post good stories about Pierre

00:19:39.040 Polyev and bad stories about Mark Carney?

00:19:40.880 Well, they actually don't do that. They've actually been covering the internal fighting

00:19:44.740 going on, the CPC campaign and Corey Tanike from Ontario, the Ford campaign attacking Jenny

00:19:50.700 Byrne and the CPC HQ. They've been covering all that. He is just delusional. Are those more

00:19:56.180 pro conservative papers? Absolutely. Just as the Toronto Star, the Global News, the Globe

00:20:01.560 and Mail, CTV News and CBC are more liberal leaning papers.

00:20:04.400 Well, Post Media, one of the largest news companies in Canada is owned by Chatham Asset

00:20:08.640 Management, which is a hedge fund that supports the Republicans and Donald Trump. So, you know,

00:20:13.060 there is some foreign interference, but it ain't coming from China, at least not the effect

00:20:16.640 of foreign interference. 1.00

00:20:17.340 He's just a hypocrite. He's just a hypocrite. So a American organization that is more pro 1.00

00:20:25.100 Republican owns conservative papers in Canada. And we're supposed to be thinking that that's

00:20:30.460 why they're pro Polyev. It's because the Americans are telling them to be pro Polyev

00:20:33.960 as if people like Brian Lilly didn't work for them well before that, as if they haven't always

00:20:39.060 been conservative papers of record. It's just now they're now working on behalf of Donald Trump

00:20:44.980 to get Polyev elected, even though that Trump has been very flippant about the fact that he

00:20:48.980 doesn't like Polyev very much and would prefer the liberals to win. And if you ever watch those

00:20:53.860 interviews with Trump saying he prefers to work with liberals, you can tell that he means it

00:20:58.500 because it's always that no, no, as like Laura Ingraham saying, well, wouldn't that make the liberals

00:21:03.940 win? Don't you want conservatives? He's like, I don't care. I don't care. I don't like Polyev.

00:21:07.180 He had a chance to, you know, get an endorsement from me and he didn't want it. It was so obvious

00:21:11.620 that that was his actual opinion because he was annoyed by the fact that it was even being asked

00:21:15.780 of him. But this is the type of people that kids are watching on TikTok is Frank Dominic, who

00:21:20.640 literally will just excuse Chinese foreign interference. A big topic in Canadian politics

00:21:26.200 over the last few years, because it's been proven to have had an actual impact on general election

00:21:31.220 results in certain ridings. And he's just like, well, that doesn't matter. There's a 0% chance it

00:21:36.700 affected anything. But did you know that post media has American investors and ownership

00:21:41.480 in the U S even though they've been conservative forever and they've not really changed their

00:21:45.840 opinions in any way back to foreign interference is coming from America and the Republicans

00:21:49.400 and MAGA. If you want us to update on the election and politics at the like and follow

00:21:52.400 by do this guy, this guy's never thought he's been wrong about anything. You can just tell

00:21:57.620 that it's just smugness personified until one human being, but you guys have probably had

00:22:03.280 enough of Frank Dominic. So let's move on to some other people. So have you guys heard

00:22:08.380 apparently pure poly of and the conservatives are going to take away your abortions from 1.00

00:22:14.620 your, like, I don't know, from your drag Queens in their drag queen story hours or whatever. 0.98

00:22:20.920 And they're also going to throw your grandmother downstairs. Well, here's this lady saying that 1.00

00:22:25.760 conservatives are super pro-life and they're going to take away women's rights or something 0.95

00:22:29.640 like that based on nothing. She doesn't even make an argument in this video.

00:22:34.740 So I've come across a few videos this morning of men saying that women shouldn't be concerned

00:22:39.960 about, um, their rights to healthcare and bodily autonomy with the, um, conservative party. 0.99

00:22:45.960 Just say, just say killing kids, just say abortion, killing unborn kids. Come on. 1.00

00:22:50.860 But the thing is that people like this are moral cowards. So they don't want to say it. 0.96

00:22:53.780 One young man in particular seems to have a pretty strong opinion for a child who knows

00:22:59.080 nothing about women's bodies or their healthcare. So as somebody who works in the field and is 1.00

00:23:04.300 currently coming to you from an exam room. Oh wow. She's standing in an exam room. We 0.65

00:23:09.660 should just base all of her policies off of what she thinks. I'm going to explain to you 0.99

00:23:13.980 that yes, you do need to be concerned. So one in five pregnancies is a miscarriage one in five.

00:23:22.320 So that means that almost every woman, you know, or you, if you are a woman has been in a situation

00:23:30.160 where, um, there is either a lifesaving procedure or a law in place to protect you under these particular

00:23:40.080 bans, the majority of what is affected is that the protections for women who are experiencing

00:23:47.740 pregnancy complications. What are we even talking about here? What I'm pro-life. So I can tell you

00:23:55.700 the conservative party is not running on a pro-life platform. I wish they were because it would be a

00:24:00.440 good thing, but what is she even on about? What person has she even pointed to who is saying that

00:24:07.080 they're going to do this? She is just going on about nothing, acting as if she's making a point

00:24:11.960 here. It would be like if I told you, you know, people are telling you that you don't have to

00:24:18.400 be concerned that the liberal party is going to beat you to death and burn down your house,

00:24:24.060 but here are the facts. And then I just start telling you how like house fires are really bad

00:24:28.620 or something like that. I never point to anything the liberal party's ever said or done.

00:24:31.840 This is how shallow this is. Or miscarriage. The fact that that is even included in these bans is

00:24:38.920 abhorrent to begin with. They're not included in the bans. There's no Republican state in the U.S.

00:24:44.080 who has banned the concept of miscarrying a child. And unfortunately, not a lot of people even realize

00:24:50.060 that. You're actually thinking, you know, oh, I'm saving the life of someone. But when in reality,

00:24:55.600 what you're doing when you are endorsing things like that is you are endorsing the removal of

00:25:02.980 protection for women. I like how she kind of did tacitly have to acknowledge that, you know,

00:25:08.560 banning certain abortion practices are saving a life. But then she's like, but then it removes 1.00

00:25:12.980 protections as well. And we are still we are like three quarters into the video and she still hasn't

00:25:18.580 named a thing that the conservatives are planning on doing. And that is what the conservative party

00:25:23.020 has consistently voted to do. Every single member. Every single member. No. The only law

00:25:31.400 that the conservatives have voted for that was pro-life even a little bit, even progressives

00:25:36.980 like Melissa Lansman voted for it, like people who are socially progressive. They voted for a law that 0.97

00:25:41.640 would have upgraded sentencing for murdering or assaulting a pregnant woman. Do you know who voted

00:25:46.800 against it? Every other party. Isn't that a little disgusting that they didn't even think that that was

00:25:52.280 worth having an upgraded sentence for? Because it would give too much humanity to the unborn child

00:25:57.180 to think that if you beat a woman and she miscarries that you owe her anything financially or you should

00:26:03.480 be charged more heavily. You don't you don't owe them anything other than just saying that, oh, yeah,

00:26:07.940 you assaulted them. Don't do that. Like, you know, just here's a minor assault charge. That's how

00:26:12.300 goblin like the liberals and the NDP and the block are. That's what they did. That's how they voted on 0.93

00:26:18.600 that bill. And again, they've consistently always voted this way. I wish there was more

00:26:23.700 consistent pro-life voting MPs. There's not that many. Maybe a third of them are consistently

00:26:30.560 pro-life voting in certain cases. I would say it's more like a quarter. So what is she even

00:26:37.040 talking about? Like, name the law. Consistently voted to remove the protections for women

00:26:41.620 in which law? These situations. And it is not just about saving babies' lives whatsoever.

00:26:51.480 So she is at least acknowledging it's about saving children's lives when you do put up bills like this,

00:26:56.220 but which laws? And if that were the case, don't you think on top of that, that they would also want

00:27:01.560 programs in place to take care of babies once they're born? They do. Conservatives, pro-life

00:27:07.780 conservatives donate heavily to crisis pregnancy centers that give mothers massive financial

00:27:14.140 resources and other physical resources in order to help them. Pro-life conservatives give tons of

00:27:21.160 money to these things. But yet what they want to do is remove all of those social programs on top of 0.99

00:27:26.120 that. So like, where is the pro-life in this? It's, it's cruelty.

00:27:34.540 It's cruelty, guys. It's cruelty. This lady who doesn't know what any of the issues of this election 1.00

00:27:40.700 are going to tell you, you can't vote conservative because protections and conservatives are not going

00:27:46.800 to take away universal dental. And are you even pro-life if you're going to take away universal dental

00:27:51.460 programs from the child that you didn't want to board in? My goodness. Here's this lady who's 1.00

00:27:58.080 going to be trying to make a comparison between peer poly of and Donald Trump because they have big

00:28:02.460 rallies, but are poly of rallies even that big? And you know, Mark Carney has big rallies. You'll see

00:28:07.880 what she's going to get into. Again, I don't really preview these videos. I watched the first 30 seconds

00:28:12.000 and it gets pretty absurd. Oh, allergy season in Toronto. Jesus. Anyway, note that springs here. But

00:28:21.540 I'm watching a video the other day, an interview that the Globe and Mail, no, a press conference,

00:28:27.820 a press conference. The Globe and Mail reporter asked Polyev a question about his messaging at his

00:28:33.020 rallies and whether he was preaching to the choir. And all Polyev could do was, was revert to like a

00:28:40.100 six-year-old and say, did you see that rally? How many people do you think were there?

00:28:45.000 Yeah, it was impressive. There was like 9,000 to 11, 12,000 people there. That is impressive. And

00:28:51.600 it does make the question, if you're preaching to the choir, kind of absurd when you can bring that

00:28:55.800 many people. And it's a big choir. How many people? Do you think it was this amount? Do you think

00:28:59.740 like so Trumpish? It's crazy how Trumpish that is. This obsession with size, size versus quality.

00:29:08.180 It's also another tactic to avoid actually answering the question. Carney's got big rallies too. There's

00:29:13.740 people lined up all over to get into Carney's rallies. But I guess he doesn't feel the need

00:29:18.060 to brag about it. Like, because there's nothing to brag about. What is he gonna, he's gonna brag

00:29:22.620 about his one rally that had 2,000 people there. That's impressive for like, you know, a local

00:29:28.240 candidate. But in this general election, where they're trying to compete with Polyev's rally sizes.

00:29:34.080 Yeah, that actually does look really, that's why you can't brag about it, because you would

00:29:39.160 just be highlighting the fact that you think 2,000 is impressive. So if someone brought in

00:29:44.040 11,000, 12,000, isn't that now six times as impressive? That's why they can't acknowledge

00:29:50.720 the difference or how big their rallies are.

00:29:52.920 Like a child. Um, it's getting close. And now, Polyev is spouting some ideas. He's spouting

00:30:00.640 a platform. No fucking backup with how it's going to happen, though. 0.99

00:30:04.840 Uh, what's she talking about? What did he, what did Polyev claim to do that was so absurd 0.99

00:30:10.400 that he has to have like, a giant thesis on how to do it? He's like, wanting to lower taxes

00:30:14.960 taxes. And like, get rid of like DEI spending in government. And like, you know, put in place

00:30:20.340 tough on crime policies. Like a lot of stuff is like zero cost.

00:30:23.960 There's no details about it. That's the difference between a Polyev campaign and a Kearney campaign.

00:30:29.900 Kearney is very specific about how it's going to roll out. And he's like,

00:30:34.000 What's going to roll out? The housing plan, he is just copy and pasted from, from Trudeau,

00:30:40.140 in which he's just saying, we're going to spend $36 billion to make a bunch of prefab houses.

00:30:45.560 And we're also not going to get rid of any of the regulations that make it impossible to build.

00:30:49.040 And somehow we're going to put it all up. Like that's been the main criticism from even some

00:30:54.920 of the liberal media saying that Kearney has to get more specific. He needs more policy ideas

00:30:59.140 because all he talks about is Trump. I have had friends go to Kearney rallies just to see what it

00:31:03.900 was like. It is literally 20 minutes of saying, we're strong. We're not the 51st state. We're

00:31:10.080 going to stand up strong against Trump rather than sitting down meekly. And it's just that until

00:31:15.700 he basically says, we need to invest in our small business community. We need to have growth that's

00:31:22.420 also sustainable. We need more Canadian energy in Canada, but also we need more green energy.

00:31:29.460 Like that is it. He is the least specific person in this entire campaign of all the major party

00:31:34.480 leaders.

00:31:34.820 Actually rolling things out in real time. Polyev had the nerve to accuse him of abandoning his

00:31:41.740 campaign twice. Abandoning his campaign to actually do real work as the prime minister

00:31:48.800 in a time of crisis.

00:31:51.240 He actually doesn't have the power to do anything. He's barely the prime minister. That's the problem.

00:31:56.720 And he wasn't negotiating with Trump in any way. He pretended like he was going to talk tough to

00:32:02.440 Trump. And then he had what was the most basic phone call of Trump, where he had basically agreed

00:32:06.660 to everything Trump wanted, which like is maybe the way you should do it. But the idea that Carney

00:32:12.120 somehow has the secret sauce of, you know, how to run this country is absolutely absurd. And I got to

00:32:18.760 say, it probably is not unlikely that Carney keeps leaving the campaign trail to busy himself with

00:32:24.960 stuff he doesn't even need to do now. Because what he previously told Trump is that we don't need to

00:32:29.220 talk right now. Because we'll talk later after the election. That's when we'll go over the trade

00:32:33.580 issues. Because he didn't actually want the trade issue to be resolved because he wanted it to be

00:32:37.440 a constant election issue. Now the tariffs are gone for the most part. And now Carney, I don't know,

00:32:44.820 is trying to busy himself by trying to now start up trade negotiations because it, you know,

00:32:49.300 takes away from all the negative attention he's been having from just frankly flat out lying at all

00:32:54.740 his press conferences, like claiming he wasn't involved with the CCP front group and then photos

00:32:59.740 with him and them come out later, or him being asked about his reversal on Bill C-69. And then he

00:33:06.460 says, well, I've reversed myself, even though he literally told Daniel Smith, he'd get rid of it,

00:33:10.340 and then told Premier Francois Legault, he wouldn't. He is utterly incompetent on the campaign trail. 0.51

00:33:17.220 He cannot keep anything straight.

00:33:18.520 When we have these tariffs rolling in, who listens to this and thinks it makes sense? The guy is

00:33:26.220 actually prime minister. He's on the ground doing the work. He's actually not prime minister. He has

00:33:31.380 never tabled a throne speech. There's literally no ability for him to function in parliament.

00:33:36.720 He's proving to us every single day that he is more than capable. He is the leader that we need,

00:33:43.760 and he is an action. He's a person of action and a person of his word. The other guy is not. I mean,

00:33:50.940 he is still reverting at this late stage to misinformation and attacks on Kearney. And when

00:33:57.100 all you have is an attack machine, you've got nothing. You're skating on thin ice. You are skating on

00:34:03.040 thin ice. So rally away, little Pete, little Pierre, rally away.

00:34:08.160 This is the average liberal voter at this point. People who are just convinced that their side's

00:34:15.760 right and correct, and your side is full of misinformation and hate and tax. A bunch of hate 0.84

00:34:21.780 and vitriol over there at little Pierre Poly of rallies. They happen to have like literally 10,000

00:34:29.440 people, more than 10,000 people. He happens to be filling up bigger rooms in places like PEI

00:34:35.760 than Kearney is filling up in like Richmond and Victoria. There is a difference in kind there.

00:34:42.240 And the reason that they're criticizing these rallies is because they're effective. It's because

00:34:47.000 it does tell you something about non-voters in 2021 and who they're lining up behind. Because when

00:34:52.240 you look at the demographics showing up to these rallies, it's like young working class men who

00:34:57.900 usually don't even vote. And they're waiting outside because they couldn't even get into the rally

00:35:01.860 just to see Polyev for like two minutes afterwards. That's powerful. That might not win the election.

00:35:08.020 Who knows? Guys, get a lawn sign, go out and help your local campaign. But that is telling of a certain

00:35:14.180 type of strength that conservative leaders don't usually have, if any leader usually has, having

00:35:19.700 very young working class people showing up. Even Trudeau, when he had young people showing up for him in

00:35:24.380 2015, it was for like the promise of pot. And it was not really working class men. It usually was, 0.98

00:35:30.700 you know, young urbanites who helped him sweep places like Toronto and Vancouver back then in

00:35:36.260 Montreal. Anyway, so that should be it for me in this video. Rest assured that this is stuff that the

00:35:44.100 left thinks are good arguments. I am pulling this oftentimes from accounts who all they do is repost

00:35:50.580 TikToks from the left that they think were good stuff. This isn't like libs of TikTok in the U.S.

00:35:56.860 where they find ridiculous liberal people posting videos that make them look bad. This is what they 0.90

00:36:02.740 think are solid strikes on Polyev and the Conservative Party. Like Lesley and Lewis is hanging out with the 0.90

00:36:08.820 AFD and now anything that the AFD has ever been accused of is what the Conservative Party have done.

00:36:14.500 Okay, okay, Frank. Okay. And then the other lady saying they're going to take away your abortions and 1.00

00:36:18.660 they're gonna like take away protections or whatever and they're going to take away your

00:36:24.580 abortions from your trans drag queen story hours or whatever. It's like they don't have anything of 1.00

00:36:31.680 substance. And then that last lady has the audacity to say that Carney's very specific and Polyev won't

00:36:37.180 talk about his policies. Polyev has been rolling out a new policy every other day. Or I think it's more

00:36:42.160 like every day. Like his new one, his new three-strike policy on crime. They have good policies on mass

00:36:48.160 approval of new resource projects, new building projects. They've been doing a lot. Reducing taxes

00:36:53.200 is something that Polyev announced before Carney did. And then Carney even stole Polyev's policy for

00:36:59.120 getting rid of the carbon tax. Anyways, so that's it for this video, guys. Like the video, subscribe to the

00:37:05.060 channel, leave a comment, do all that great stuff. I know it's a very long video today. Hopefully you'll like that

00:37:10.080 sort of thing. I'll see you guys all next time.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 11, 2025

Leftist attacks on Poilievre keep getting more INSANE!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript