Leftist attacks on Poilievre keep getting more INSANE!
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
191.0508
Summary
In this episode, I take a look at some of the latest anti-conservative videos that have been making waves on TikTok, and try to convince you that you are correct in every way possible to vote Conservative in the upcoming federal election.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I often like to spotlight the videos that left-wing TikTokers
00:00:06.420
make on this show to show the unfiltered arguments from the left against Pierre Polyev and the
00:00:11.860
conservatives and demonstrate how empty and shallow they are. These people are full of
00:00:17.140
anti-conservative smugness. They don't have good arguments, half the time they're just making
00:00:21.840
things up or completely misinterpreting the facts, but they are so self-confident that they
00:00:27.120
have never been wrong in their entire lives. So I want to go through some of the recent stuff I
00:00:32.360
found with you guys today to build your confidence that no, you absolutely are correct for voting
00:00:38.020
conservative. These people cannot come up with anything to actually argue against you voting
00:00:42.960
conservative other than the conservatives are not leftists. But before I get into the first video,
00:00:48.540
guys, just a reminder, if you like my federal election coverage, make sure to like this video.
00:00:53.400
If you're not yet subscribed, hit the subscribe button and leave a comment on the topic of the
00:00:58.300
video today. It helps us in the algorithm and I do like to go and read through what people are saying.
00:01:03.800
Anyways, so let's jump into our first video from one of our favorites, Frank Dominic, a man often wrong
00:01:11.880
but never in doubt of himself and who I hear is a school teacher, but you'd get me fooled because he
00:01:18.520
seems more so like he's just professionally impressed with himself all the time. Take it
00:01:23.500
away, Frank. Then there was former conservative MP Candace Burgeon who has been seen proudly wearing
00:01:28.020
a MAGA hat and other conservative MPs have also been associated either with MAGA or the alt-right
00:01:32.700
German AFD party for both. Leslie Lewis is an example of this. Her and- Oh yeah, Leslie Lewis,
00:01:37.660
probably a massive racist. And two other conservative MPs met with members of the AFD, a political party
00:01:43.580
which recently had to dissolve its youth wing for being too extremist. And to be clear, the AFD is
00:01:48.440
not the German conservative party, which was formerly led by Angela Merkel. The AFD is-
00:01:53.300
Angela Merkel's party isn't exactly the conservative party either. It's kind of like a center-center-right
00:01:58.760
party. That's all you can really say about the CDU.
00:02:01.720
It's an extreme far-right group that conservatives in Germany have completely ruled out working with.
00:02:06.460
What do they actually believe, Frank? What does the AFD believe that is extreme right?
00:02:13.440
They're against mass immigration? They're against random migrants from Syria showing up in their
00:02:18.340
borders? He actually has to make an argument here. So, so far, Leslie Lewis is a bad person for having
00:02:25.280
been seen with an AFD politician who here probably have later condemned as being not a good person. I think
00:02:32.240
he was hyperbolic with it. I understand why he said it. But what is the actual argument here?
00:02:37.280
Leslie Lewis and two other conservative MPs took a photo with that AFD MEP. And then what? Because apparently
00:02:45.620
he just wants to do a bunch of guilt by association nonsense where he hasn't even proven one of the parties
00:02:51.280
is a guilty party yet. Because, like, I guess they met once and that means that Leslie Lewis has contracted
00:02:58.340
all of the sins of the AFD. And this is why it's so shocking that Pierre's conservatives have
00:03:04.560
absolutely no issues being associated with them. No, they literally condemn them. Polly have even got
00:03:10.340
criticism from the right for condemning them because it was a bit of a hyperbolic condemnation.
00:03:16.280
Leslie Lewis was also at a recent ARC convention in London, a far-right anti-climate gathering.
00:03:22.380
No, it isn't. It literally isn't. There's, like, mainstream conservative party figures from the UK there,
00:03:27.480
like conservative leader Kemi Badenoch. That's patently absurd.
00:03:31.920
Organized by everyone's favorite Canadian, Jordan Peterson. She chaired a panel with a former Trump advisor,
00:03:36.680
Scott Atlas. Leslie Lewis has also been hinted at by Pierre to be in his cabinet. Great pick.
00:03:41.480
Then there's a conservative candidate for Kitchener, Matt Strauss. Matt has said some questionable things
00:03:45.660
on Twitter recently, including, like, during the pandemic, asking if he could get refugee status in Florida.
00:03:51.420
Oh my goodness, it's a joke about how draconian the Canadian rules were around COVID lockdowns.
00:03:56.480
Matt Strauss, being a doctor, who is critical of lockdown policies and mandates because he argued
00:04:02.420
that it actually didn't help. Even away from just the rights and freedoms perspective,
00:04:07.480
he made the argument this is all deeply counterproductive. He's a very reasonable person.
00:04:12.540
Why would he ask that? It might have something to do with the fact that he's pretty anti-vax.
00:04:16.420
And he doesn't seem... He's actually not anti-vax. I know, Matt Strauss,
00:04:19.300
he is not an anti-vaxxer. Like, yeah, he's against mandates because you should be able to choose what you
00:04:23.800
take. He's absolutely not. Frank is just lying about him because he doesn't have an argument.
00:04:28.100
I think COVID was that big of a deal, considering that he said he'd rather give his children COVID-19
00:04:31.680
than a McDonald's Happy Meal. Yeah, and because, as you see on the chart,
00:04:35.080
because nobody under the age of eight died of COVID effectively.
00:04:38.680
That's not really the weirdest thing he said either. And his anti-vax claims were such a problem
00:04:42.280
that Queen's University dismissed him, with him saying that Queen's tried to cancel him. Well,
00:04:46.300
Twitter very proudly pronounced they were going to be funding his lawsuit against Queen's.
00:04:49.660
X is proud to fund a lawsuit filed by Dr. Matthew Strauss, an Ontario critical care physician and
00:04:53.960
professor, against his former employer, Queen's University. What is the actual argument here
00:04:59.300
that Frank Dominic is attempting to make? He doesn't even attempt an argument. He just says,
00:05:05.220
you know, X is funding a lawsuit against Queen's University for Matt Strauss's wrongful
00:05:10.580
dismissal. And I guess that's bad because I have just said he's an anti-vaxxer with no evidence.
00:05:16.500
No evidence, by the way. But, you know, Leslie Lewis once talked to the AFD, so we know Leslie
00:05:23.840
Lewis is a white supremacist. If we know anything in this world, it's that Leslie Lewis is a white
00:05:30.620
nationalist. So let's move on to the next one. This one's about Joe Rogan and the Conservative
00:05:36.540
Party, because apparently Joe Rogan is a big figure in this election for the Conservatives.
00:05:41.000
There's also Joe Rogan. While the famous podcaster isn't MAGA, he's also called Pierre very smart and
00:05:46.360
a common sense guy. Oh my goodness. String up Pierre. Kill Pierre. Joe Rogan once said something
00:05:53.900
nice about him. Joe Rogan, everyone's favorite fascist. You know, the guy who is a libertarian
00:06:00.260
MMA commentator and former fighter who hosts a podcast where he just talks to random people.
00:06:05.060
Now we know that Polyev is a dangerous man who needs to be stopped because Joe Rogan said something
00:06:10.340
about him. And has also many times called Canada a communist country, including a profanity-filled
00:06:15.380
rant where he called Canada the 51st state. And it... Oh my goodness. The worst thing that's ever
00:06:21.120
happened. That's up there with like the things that Idi Amin did is Joe Rogan saying 51st state
00:06:27.760
is a joke about Canada. In multiple instances, accused Canada of being communist. It was a very
00:06:33.200
stunning display of language. He also said we don't have free speech in Canada, but why don't you tell
00:06:37.520
out to all the alt-right trolls in my comment section who are constantly demanding that I be
00:06:41.620
fired. Kind of seems like they have the free speech to continue to harass me and I have the free speech
00:06:45.760
to keep making videos. But we... Um, nobody's ever actually gone after Frank Graves, uh, Frank, uh,
00:06:52.920
Dominic. I think I accidentally called him Frank Graves there for a bit. But nobody's ever gone after
00:06:56.860
Frank Dominic's ability to speak freely. Parents at his own school had complained that he is teaching
00:07:03.900
socialist type concepts as well as like gender theory in the classroom unsolicitedly to their
00:07:10.900
kids. And then he claims, well, it's part of the curriculum, which it's really not. He is really
00:07:16.400
stretching the definition of what the curriculum means so that he can go on his TikTok rants in
00:07:20.820
front of children while being paid by taxpayers. That's what people have a problem with. Just as if
00:07:26.640
I was working for the government, if I was in like the prosecutor's office, if I was working for like,
00:07:33.580
you know, Canada border services, if I was working at parliament as a nonpartisan employee, yeah, I
00:07:40.100
should be fired if I was doing this show at the same time. You can't do that. But yeah, again, I don't
00:07:47.280
see the argument here from, from Frank Dominic. Where, when are we getting to an argument? I got
00:07:53.380
another one right here. I'm going to queue up. This one is about how Pierre Polyev is apparently very
00:07:58.200
scared of the media. Yeah, Pierre Polyev, I never understand this argument. Pierre Polyev is scared of
00:08:04.760
the media. The guy who also keeps getting accused of bullying the media is scared of them. It's crazy how
00:08:11.220
much Pierre Polyev is hiding from the media. And we literally have the numbers to back that up. With
00:08:15.220
Stuart Benson of the Hill Times noting that Pierre has taken the least amount of questions out of all the major
00:08:19.140
party leaders by a wide margin. Under over what period of time during the election? He's been
00:08:26.960
extremely open with the media up till now. He limits media questions because he's on a tight schedule and
00:08:32.980
does far more events than Mark Carney. And by the way, when you actually hear these media questions,
00:08:37.860
they're absurd. And I do not blame him for not taking a dozen questions from every single CBC affiliate.
00:08:43.580
In the first two weeks of the campaign, he took 65 questions with the liberals taking 148 and the
00:08:48.740
NDP doing 208. And it's crazy just how many days they only took four questions. They are really
00:08:54.340
keeping a muzzle and a leash on journalists. And yeah, there are... A muzzle and a leash. So in the last
00:09:00.080
video, Frank Dominic accuses his critics of wanting to crack down on his free speech for criticizing him.
00:09:07.240
And then he is now saying it is putting a muzzle on journalists to say we're just doing four
00:09:12.300
questions this press conference. Oh my goodness, a muzzle has been placed on the camp on the
00:09:16.500
journalists because there were four questions offered at a very fast press conference event.
00:09:21.320
Days where Carney takes no questions, but on average, he's taking 10 questions per day,
00:09:24.980
which is over double what Pierre is doing. And Singh is doing everything in his power to get in the face
00:09:28.860
of media to get attention from Canadians, which is... And no one cares about who he is because he has
00:09:33.240
nothing to offer. It's a good thing. We want our politicians to be out there. We want our politicians to be
00:09:37.020
answering questions. And Pierre is almost exclusively getting questions from local or independent
00:09:41.300
journalists, which you might think is a good thing, but let me explain why he's doing it.
00:09:44.380
Places like CTV, Global News, CBC, those are established journalists for the most part who
00:09:49.340
are pretty strong in the questions that they ask. Think back to that Apple interview. The person who
00:09:53.540
interviewed Pierre for that, he didn't really know what he was doing. He wasn't trained to interview
00:09:57.240
the leader of a federal party. That man... What? Okay, the man in the Apple video talking to
00:10:04.820
Pierre Polyev. I do not know his name, but I remember the reporting around him at the time because
00:10:09.160
there was this left-wing conspiracy that the man was an actor paid by Polyev to ask him an absurd
00:10:14.980
question so he could dunk on him. That man was a veteran journalist, has worked at many Oitslets.
00:10:20.760
You could even tell from the man's age he was not doing a cub reporter gig. He's not like some 23-year-old
00:10:26.600
he's getting his first job. That man had been a journalist for a long time. But now Frank has just
00:10:32.280
made up the idea that that man was just underqualified, and that's why Polyev bested him.
00:10:38.000
Polyev's best moments are him on CTV News or CP24 going after the host for trying to get him to agree
00:10:46.740
that there are more than two genders. That was CP24 CTV News. A bunch of his other best moments were
00:10:54.000
about him going after like CBC journalists asking him ridiculous questions when he was at like a PEI
00:10:59.800
gas station in late 2023 or early 2024. He's had a lot of good moments involving the legacy media.
00:11:06.560
He's never really shied away. The difference is that we're in an election period where the media
00:11:11.360
has proven that they are willing to just train as many guns on Polyev at a time and just blast away
00:11:17.040
at him for nonsense. So obviously he's limiting the amount of questions. Ask me a real question.
00:11:22.880
Don't throw mud. Just boil it down to four questions. And guess what? The other media can still use the
00:11:29.020
footage of him answering a question from another journalist at those press conferences in their
00:11:33.180
own reports. If anything, Carney was actually stupid to take so many questions because during the Paul
00:11:37.840
Chang controversy, he answered the same question like 10 times in a row, which was great for
00:11:42.960
conservatives to have all this footage of him standing by Paul Chang. But if Carney was smart,
00:11:47.660
he would have said, no, you only get, we only have one question per subject and we're moving on.
00:11:54.580
And Pierre mopped the floor with him. Pierre made quick work of him. He did that on purpose to show
00:11:58.420
strength. And it's the same thing here. When he goes to independent media, he's going to people
00:12:02.280
that he know are going to give him softball questions. When he goes to local media, he's
00:12:05.380
going to people that he knows that he can steamroll over with Pierre having given global news five
00:12:09.280
whole questions, which is a huge amount, but he actually gave three to just Brian Lilly of the
00:12:13.840
Toronto sun, which is equal to the total number of questions given to CTV news, the Canadian press
00:12:17.920
and the Francophone press and CBC, the latter of whom has not been given a question since March 27th.
00:12:23.700
Pierre is completely ignoring one. Yeah. Cause he wants to defund them because they are a waste of
00:12:27.920
taxpayer money. The largest media providers in our country. Why are they large? Cause they're
00:12:31.780
given $1.4 billion a year. They're not actually large. They have not earned any of their largesse.
00:12:37.300
And it's cause he's scared. He's terrified of journalists. He's terrified of accountability.
00:12:40.460
And he's terrified that he's going to say something to make his poll numbers drop even further.
00:12:43.560
I don't know about you, but I prefer a prime minister who can actually talk to the media and
00:12:46.720
be accountable to their actions and their words. Has this man seen Jagmeet Singh actually talk to the
00:12:53.380
media? Remember in the lead up to this election where he kept getting questions about the no
00:12:58.440
confidence vote and he would fumble all over himself and spaghetti would start falling out of
00:13:02.600
his pockets. He's like bumbling around so much. Just didn't know what to say. Looked like a complete
00:13:07.720
idiot up there. Mark Carney, he is the um and ah machine. That man makes more ums and ahs than the U.S.
00:13:14.600
Treasury prints money. That guy is terrible in front of cameras. Polly have, have you ever seen him
00:13:21.140
really whiff a question? There is one question I know that he had a bad answer to during this
00:13:26.500
entire election that I've seen. And it was about nominations because naturally I think the
00:13:30.320
conservatives have not done a good job posting good nominations. But other than that, he's usually
00:13:35.900
pretty good. And we're even going to get into other video makers as we go on here who are going to
00:13:41.760
criticize Polly have because, well, he's too smooth and snarky with the media. Does a man being smooth
00:13:48.680
and snarky sound like he's someone who is deeply terrified of what's being asked of him? Here's
00:13:54.340
another one of another one from Frank Dominic talking about the Chinese Communist Party. And
00:13:59.940
I just want to see, does he actually attack Mark Carney for this or is he going to somehow make
00:14:04.260
it about the conservatives? By the way, I don't preview any of these videos. I want to watch them
00:14:08.840
for the first time with you guys. So let's see how he uses this topic where in the header he talks
00:14:14.480
about the CCP and Carney. Did you know that Mark Carney is being supported by the Chinese Communist
00:14:18.580
Party? If you've heard that in the last few days, you might want to clean up your algorithm. Here's
00:14:22.140
the long short of it. A report came out that basically said that there is some foreign
00:14:24.940
interference happening. One of the largest news groups on WeChat, which is basically WhatsApp in
00:14:28.900
China, is promoting Mark Carney. Or are they? Because the report itself says that there are both positive
00:14:33.980
and negative messages about Carney. So what is actually happening? What's actually happening is that
00:14:40.100
they are promoting Mark Carney. Sam Cooper has gone over this. Everyone else who has reported on it says,
00:14:45.480
yes, there are negative things that are reported about Mark Carney. But the overall narrative is that Mark
00:14:52.200
Carney is a very smart and intelligent man, and he is very good at dealing with Donald Trump. You're just
00:14:58.140
mixing in ambiguity by saying, you know, that they've said some things wrong. It would be like saying that
00:15:03.860
I'm not a pro-Polyev channel because I have said negative things about Polyev and Conservatives
00:15:09.420
before. I've even just mentioned one right now in this video that I don't think they dealt with
00:15:14.120
nominations properly. Way too many picking and choosing favorites rather than just letting the
00:15:18.600
nomination play out. Way too many appointments. But if you were to come over to someone and say,
00:15:23.240
well, Wyatt's not pro-Polyev. He said some critical things about him before. He said critical
00:15:27.760
things about the Conservative Party. That person should laugh at you. I am obviously a pro-Conservative
00:15:32.800
channel. But now Frank Dominic here and other people on the left are going to pretend that
00:15:38.320
it's ambiguous whether or not this WeChat scandal was actually a problem or not, or whether they
00:15:44.760
were really supporting Carney. And it was absurd the media headlines that came out of this. Oh,
00:15:50.900
there is a pro-Beijing media outlet that is targeting Carney. And when they meant targeting,
00:15:55.860
they meant targeting how great his resume is. It was the most absurd headline I've ever seen.
00:16:00.140
It's a complete reversal of meaning. Foreign state actors like Russia and China don't really
00:16:05.440
care about one political party or another, except when it comes to Trump, because obviously Russia
00:16:09.900
prefers Trump and China doesn't like him. But in... Okay, that's extremely arguable, considering that
00:16:16.260
do you know who funded Ukraine before the Russian-Ukrainian war started? It was Trump. You know
00:16:23.480
who cut off funding to the Ukrainians and didn't give them any military support until the war started?
00:16:27.920
Joe Biden. But Frank Dominic, I would never accuse him of actually knowing anything about foreign
00:16:32.820
policy, so I'll just move on here. In Canada, it really doesn't make a difference. None of the
00:16:36.540
political leaders are that insane that it would make that much of a benefit for China to support one
00:16:40.100
over the other. Has this man not read the Hogue report or has he never heard the Nisekopp report
00:16:47.740
going over foreign interference from China? They were exclusively helping liberal candidates.
00:16:52.980
The only liberal candidate they attacked was former liberal Kevin Vuong, who actually never even sat as a
00:16:59.880
liberal in parliament because the Chinese, like the CCP basically targeted him, smeared him with a fake
00:17:05.780
sexual assault story in order to get Justin Trudeau to drop him. The problem is that they dropped him
00:17:11.060
past the point they could actually remove him as the candidate. He somehow won the election anyways.
00:17:15.440
That was the only liberal they targeted. An anti-CCP liberal. All of the liberals, all the people that the
00:17:21.380
CCP pro-Beijing front group supported were liberals. It was people like Paul Chang. It was people like
00:17:27.320
Han Dong. Heather Ma. There was that guy in Vancouver something, Baines. All of them were, the only liberals
00:17:35.980
What foreign actors in China and Russia are attempting to do is to sow discord. And the people who on this app
00:17:41.120
are screaming about how Mark Carney is being supported by China, they are now doing the bidding
00:17:45.180
of China. Congratulations, you played yourself. The goal is to de-state.
00:17:48.840
How did we? You played yourself by showing that Mark Carney has very clear connections to the CCP,
00:17:55.260
gets the economic advisor job in the liberal government, and then immediately goes to Beijing
00:18:00.180
and gets a massive loan for Brookfield Asset Management. Like, I think it was like a billion dollar
00:18:06.880
loan. He has been seen hobnobbing with CCP front groups and pro-Beijing organizations, organizations
00:18:14.220
who advocate for the annexation of Taiwan into mainland China. He was defending Paul Chang after
00:18:21.580
saying that Zhou Tei should be arrested and brought to the Chinese consulate for a bounty.
00:18:25.940
He has now replaced Paul Chang after defending him for an entire day with another former cop who
00:18:36.880
All the people who were involved in foreign interference in the Hogue report, who the Hogue
00:18:40.360
report kind of lets off the hook by pretending that they're too stupid to realize that they
00:18:44.540
were engaging with CCP front groups, they're all liberals. It's obvious, but Frank Graves,
00:18:49.960
it's this fake ambiguity. Well, can we really know that they want the liberals? Well, they do this
00:18:54.700
to sow discord. It's such a stupid, cowardly narrative.
00:18:58.800
Stabilize and make it hard for us to have political conversations. The goal is to make us unstable.
00:19:03.060
And we should definitely be worried about foreign interference. But when the report basically says
00:19:06.120
this has a zero percent impact on our election or the outcome, we should not be screaming about it
00:19:10.160
as if it's this massive thing where Mark Carney is being supported by a foreign government because
00:19:15.200
But it is happening. And any report saying that there is a zero percent chance it's going to
00:19:19.600
affect things is lying. There is a reason why they had to have a press conference at parliament
00:19:25.400
about the interference that's going on to warn people. You don't warn people about something
00:19:31.000
But you know what is happening? Have you ever noticed that the Toronto Sun, the National
00:19:34.940
Post and the other companies owned by Post Media only ever post good stories about Pierre
00:19:40.880
Well, they actually don't do that. They've actually been covering the internal fighting
00:19:44.740
going on, the CPC campaign and Corey Tanike from Ontario, the Ford campaign attacking Jenny
00:19:50.700
Byrne and the CPC HQ. They've been covering all that. He is just delusional. Are those more
00:19:56.180
pro conservative papers? Absolutely. Just as the Toronto Star, the Global News, the Globe
00:20:01.560
and Mail, CTV News and CBC are more liberal leaning papers.
00:20:04.400
Well, Post Media, one of the largest news companies in Canada is owned by Chatham Asset
00:20:08.640
Management, which is a hedge fund that supports the Republicans and Donald Trump. So, you know,
00:20:13.060
there is some foreign interference, but it ain't coming from China, at least not the effect
00:20:17.340
He's just a hypocrite. He's just a hypocrite. So a American organization that is more pro
00:20:25.100
Republican owns conservative papers in Canada. And we're supposed to be thinking that that's
00:20:30.460
why they're pro Polyev. It's because the Americans are telling them to be pro Polyev
00:20:33.960
as if people like Brian Lilly didn't work for them well before that, as if they haven't always
00:20:39.060
been conservative papers of record. It's just now they're now working on behalf of Donald Trump
00:20:44.980
to get Polyev elected, even though that Trump has been very flippant about the fact that he
00:20:48.980
doesn't like Polyev very much and would prefer the liberals to win. And if you ever watch those
00:20:53.860
interviews with Trump saying he prefers to work with liberals, you can tell that he means it
00:20:58.500
because it's always that no, no, as like Laura Ingraham saying, well, wouldn't that make the liberals
00:21:03.940
win? Don't you want conservatives? He's like, I don't care. I don't care. I don't like Polyev.
00:21:07.180
He had a chance to, you know, get an endorsement from me and he didn't want it. It was so obvious
00:21:11.620
that that was his actual opinion because he was annoyed by the fact that it was even being asked
00:21:15.780
of him. But this is the type of people that kids are watching on TikTok is Frank Dominic, who
00:21:20.640
literally will just excuse Chinese foreign interference. A big topic in Canadian politics
00:21:26.200
over the last few years, because it's been proven to have had an actual impact on general election
00:21:31.220
results in certain ridings. And he's just like, well, that doesn't matter. There's a 0% chance it
00:21:36.700
affected anything. But did you know that post media has American investors and ownership
00:21:41.480
in the U S even though they've been conservative forever and they've not really changed their
00:21:45.840
opinions in any way back to foreign interference is coming from America and the Republicans
00:21:49.400
and MAGA. If you want us to update on the election and politics at the like and follow
00:21:52.400
by do this guy, this guy's never thought he's been wrong about anything. You can just tell
00:21:57.620
that it's just smugness personified until one human being, but you guys have probably had
00:22:03.280
enough of Frank Dominic. So let's move on to some other people. So have you guys heard
00:22:08.380
apparently pure poly of and the conservatives are going to take away your abortions from
00:22:14.620
your, like, I don't know, from your drag Queens in their drag queen story hours or whatever.
00:22:20.920
And they're also going to throw your grandmother downstairs. Well, here's this lady saying that
00:22:25.760
conservatives are super pro-life and they're going to take away women's rights or something
00:22:29.640
like that based on nothing. She doesn't even make an argument in this video.
00:22:34.740
So I've come across a few videos this morning of men saying that women shouldn't be concerned
00:22:39.960
about, um, their rights to healthcare and bodily autonomy with the, um, conservative party.
00:22:45.960
Just say, just say killing kids, just say abortion, killing unborn kids. Come on.
00:22:50.860
But the thing is that people like this are moral cowards. So they don't want to say it.
00:22:53.780
One young man in particular seems to have a pretty strong opinion for a child who knows
00:22:59.080
nothing about women's bodies or their healthcare. So as somebody who works in the field and is
00:23:04.300
currently coming to you from an exam room. Oh wow. She's standing in an exam room. We
00:23:09.660
should just base all of her policies off of what she thinks. I'm going to explain to you
00:23:13.980
that yes, you do need to be concerned. So one in five pregnancies is a miscarriage one in five.
00:23:22.320
So that means that almost every woman, you know, or you, if you are a woman has been in a situation
00:23:30.160
where, um, there is either a lifesaving procedure or a law in place to protect you under these particular
00:23:40.080
bans, the majority of what is affected is that the protections for women who are experiencing
00:23:47.740
pregnancy complications. What are we even talking about here? What I'm pro-life. So I can tell you
00:23:55.700
the conservative party is not running on a pro-life platform. I wish they were because it would be a
00:24:00.440
good thing, but what is she even on about? What person has she even pointed to who is saying that
00:24:07.080
they're going to do this? She is just going on about nothing, acting as if she's making a point
00:24:11.960
here. It would be like if I told you, you know, people are telling you that you don't have to
00:24:18.400
be concerned that the liberal party is going to beat you to death and burn down your house,
00:24:24.060
but here are the facts. And then I just start telling you how like house fires are really bad
00:24:28.620
or something like that. I never point to anything the liberal party's ever said or done.
00:24:31.840
This is how shallow this is. Or miscarriage. The fact that that is even included in these bans is
00:24:38.920
abhorrent to begin with. They're not included in the bans. There's no Republican state in the U.S.
00:24:44.080
who has banned the concept of miscarrying a child. And unfortunately, not a lot of people even realize
00:24:50.060
that. You're actually thinking, you know, oh, I'm saving the life of someone. But when in reality,
00:24:55.600
what you're doing when you are endorsing things like that is you are endorsing the removal of
00:25:02.980
protection for women. I like how she kind of did tacitly have to acknowledge that, you know,
00:25:08.560
banning certain abortion practices are saving a life. But then she's like, but then it removes
00:25:12.980
protections as well. And we are still we are like three quarters into the video and she still hasn't
00:25:18.580
named a thing that the conservatives are planning on doing. And that is what the conservative party
00:25:23.020
has consistently voted to do. Every single member. Every single member. No. The only law
00:25:31.400
that the conservatives have voted for that was pro-life even a little bit, even progressives
00:25:36.980
like Melissa Lansman voted for it, like people who are socially progressive. They voted for a law that
00:25:41.640
would have upgraded sentencing for murdering or assaulting a pregnant woman. Do you know who voted
00:25:46.800
against it? Every other party. Isn't that a little disgusting that they didn't even think that that was
00:25:52.280
worth having an upgraded sentence for? Because it would give too much humanity to the unborn child
00:25:57.180
to think that if you beat a woman and she miscarries that you owe her anything financially or you should
00:26:03.480
be charged more heavily. You don't you don't owe them anything other than just saying that, oh, yeah,
00:26:07.940
you assaulted them. Don't do that. Like, you know, just here's a minor assault charge. That's how
00:26:12.300
goblin like the liberals and the NDP and the block are. That's what they did. That's how they voted on
00:26:18.600
that bill. And again, they've consistently always voted this way. I wish there was more
00:26:23.700
consistent pro-life voting MPs. There's not that many. Maybe a third of them are consistently
00:26:30.560
pro-life voting in certain cases. I would say it's more like a quarter. So what is she even
00:26:37.040
talking about? Like, name the law. Consistently voted to remove the protections for women
00:26:41.620
in which law? These situations. And it is not just about saving babies' lives whatsoever.
00:26:51.480
So she is at least acknowledging it's about saving children's lives when you do put up bills like this,
00:26:56.220
but which laws? And if that were the case, don't you think on top of that, that they would also want
00:27:01.560
programs in place to take care of babies once they're born? They do. Conservatives, pro-life
00:27:07.780
conservatives donate heavily to crisis pregnancy centers that give mothers massive financial
00:27:14.140
resources and other physical resources in order to help them. Pro-life conservatives give tons of
00:27:21.160
money to these things. But yet what they want to do is remove all of those social programs on top of
00:27:26.120
that. So like, where is the pro-life in this? It's, it's cruelty.
00:27:34.540
It's cruelty, guys. It's cruelty. This lady who doesn't know what any of the issues of this election
00:27:40.700
are going to tell you, you can't vote conservative because protections and conservatives are not going
00:27:46.800
to take away universal dental. And are you even pro-life if you're going to take away universal dental
00:27:51.460
programs from the child that you didn't want to board in? My goodness. Here's this lady who's
00:27:58.080
going to be trying to make a comparison between peer poly of and Donald Trump because they have big
00:28:02.460
rallies, but are poly of rallies even that big? And you know, Mark Carney has big rallies. You'll see
00:28:07.880
what she's going to get into. Again, I don't really preview these videos. I watched the first 30 seconds
00:28:12.000
and it gets pretty absurd. Oh, allergy season in Toronto. Jesus. Anyway, note that springs here. But
00:28:21.540
I'm watching a video the other day, an interview that the Globe and Mail, no, a press conference,
00:28:27.820
a press conference. The Globe and Mail reporter asked Polyev a question about his messaging at his
00:28:33.020
rallies and whether he was preaching to the choir. And all Polyev could do was, was revert to like a
00:28:40.100
six-year-old and say, did you see that rally? How many people do you think were there?
00:28:45.000
Yeah, it was impressive. There was like 9,000 to 11, 12,000 people there. That is impressive. And
00:28:51.600
it does make the question, if you're preaching to the choir, kind of absurd when you can bring that
00:28:55.800
many people. And it's a big choir. How many people? Do you think it was this amount? Do you think
00:28:59.740
like so Trumpish? It's crazy how Trumpish that is. This obsession with size, size versus quality.
00:29:08.180
It's also another tactic to avoid actually answering the question. Carney's got big rallies too. There's
00:29:13.740
people lined up all over to get into Carney's rallies. But I guess he doesn't feel the need
00:29:18.060
to brag about it. Like, because there's nothing to brag about. What is he gonna, he's gonna brag
00:29:22.620
about his one rally that had 2,000 people there. That's impressive for like, you know, a local
00:29:28.240
candidate. But in this general election, where they're trying to compete with Polyev's rally sizes.
00:29:34.080
Yeah, that actually does look really, that's why you can't brag about it, because you would
00:29:39.160
just be highlighting the fact that you think 2,000 is impressive. So if someone brought in
00:29:44.040
11,000, 12,000, isn't that now six times as impressive? That's why they can't acknowledge
00:29:52.920
Like a child. Um, it's getting close. And now, Polyev is spouting some ideas. He's spouting
00:30:00.640
a platform. No fucking backup with how it's going to happen, though.
00:30:04.840
Uh, what's she talking about? What did he, what did Polyev claim to do that was so absurd
00:30:10.400
that he has to have like, a giant thesis on how to do it? He's like, wanting to lower taxes
00:30:14.960
taxes. And like, get rid of like DEI spending in government. And like, you know, put in place
00:30:20.340
tough on crime policies. Like a lot of stuff is like zero cost.
00:30:23.960
There's no details about it. That's the difference between a Polyev campaign and a Kearney campaign.
00:30:29.900
Kearney is very specific about how it's going to roll out. And he's like,
00:30:34.000
What's going to roll out? The housing plan, he is just copy and pasted from, from Trudeau,
00:30:40.140
in which he's just saying, we're going to spend $36 billion to make a bunch of prefab houses.
00:30:45.560
And we're also not going to get rid of any of the regulations that make it impossible to build.
00:30:49.040
And somehow we're going to put it all up. Like that's been the main criticism from even some
00:30:54.920
of the liberal media saying that Kearney has to get more specific. He needs more policy ideas
00:30:59.140
because all he talks about is Trump. I have had friends go to Kearney rallies just to see what it
00:31:03.900
was like. It is literally 20 minutes of saying, we're strong. We're not the 51st state. We're
00:31:10.080
going to stand up strong against Trump rather than sitting down meekly. And it's just that until
00:31:15.700
he basically says, we need to invest in our small business community. We need to have growth that's
00:31:22.420
also sustainable. We need more Canadian energy in Canada, but also we need more green energy.
00:31:29.460
Like that is it. He is the least specific person in this entire campaign of all the major party
00:31:34.820
Actually rolling things out in real time. Polyev had the nerve to accuse him of abandoning his
00:31:41.740
campaign twice. Abandoning his campaign to actually do real work as the prime minister
00:31:51.240
He actually doesn't have the power to do anything. He's barely the prime minister. That's the problem.
00:31:56.720
And he wasn't negotiating with Trump in any way. He pretended like he was going to talk tough to
00:32:02.440
Trump. And then he had what was the most basic phone call of Trump, where he had basically agreed
00:32:06.660
to everything Trump wanted, which like is maybe the way you should do it. But the idea that Carney
00:32:12.120
somehow has the secret sauce of, you know, how to run this country is absolutely absurd. And I got to
00:32:18.760
say, it probably is not unlikely that Carney keeps leaving the campaign trail to busy himself with
00:32:24.960
stuff he doesn't even need to do now. Because what he previously told Trump is that we don't need to
00:32:29.220
talk right now. Because we'll talk later after the election. That's when we'll go over the trade
00:32:33.580
issues. Because he didn't actually want the trade issue to be resolved because he wanted it to be
00:32:37.440
a constant election issue. Now the tariffs are gone for the most part. And now Carney, I don't know,
00:32:44.820
is trying to busy himself by trying to now start up trade negotiations because it, you know,
00:32:49.300
takes away from all the negative attention he's been having from just frankly flat out lying at all
00:32:54.740
his press conferences, like claiming he wasn't involved with the CCP front group and then photos
00:32:59.740
with him and them come out later, or him being asked about his reversal on Bill C-69. And then he
00:33:06.460
says, well, I've reversed myself, even though he literally told Daniel Smith, he'd get rid of it,
00:33:10.340
and then told Premier Francois Legault, he wouldn't. He is utterly incompetent on the campaign trail.
00:33:18.520
When we have these tariffs rolling in, who listens to this and thinks it makes sense? The guy is
00:33:26.220
actually prime minister. He's on the ground doing the work. He's actually not prime minister. He has
00:33:31.380
never tabled a throne speech. There's literally no ability for him to function in parliament.
00:33:36.720
He's proving to us every single day that he is more than capable. He is the leader that we need,
00:33:43.760
and he is an action. He's a person of action and a person of his word. The other guy is not. I mean,
00:33:50.940
he is still reverting at this late stage to misinformation and attacks on Kearney. And when
00:33:57.100
all you have is an attack machine, you've got nothing. You're skating on thin ice. You are skating on
00:34:03.040
thin ice. So rally away, little Pete, little Pierre, rally away.
00:34:08.160
This is the average liberal voter at this point. People who are just convinced that their side's
00:34:15.760
right and correct, and your side is full of misinformation and hate and tax. A bunch of hate
00:34:21.780
and vitriol over there at little Pierre Poly of rallies. They happen to have like literally 10,000
00:34:29.440
people, more than 10,000 people. He happens to be filling up bigger rooms in places like PEI
00:34:35.760
than Kearney is filling up in like Richmond and Victoria. There is a difference in kind there.
00:34:42.240
And the reason that they're criticizing these rallies is because they're effective. It's because
00:34:47.000
it does tell you something about non-voters in 2021 and who they're lining up behind. Because when
00:34:52.240
you look at the demographics showing up to these rallies, it's like young working class men who
00:34:57.900
usually don't even vote. And they're waiting outside because they couldn't even get into the rally
00:35:01.860
just to see Polyev for like two minutes afterwards. That's powerful. That might not win the election.
00:35:08.020
Who knows? Guys, get a lawn sign, go out and help your local campaign. But that is telling of a certain
00:35:14.180
type of strength that conservative leaders don't usually have, if any leader usually has, having
00:35:19.700
very young working class people showing up. Even Trudeau, when he had young people showing up for him in
00:35:24.380
2015, it was for like the promise of pot. And it was not really working class men. It usually was,
00:35:30.700
you know, young urbanites who helped him sweep places like Toronto and Vancouver back then in
00:35:36.260
Montreal. Anyway, so that should be it for me in this video. Rest assured that this is stuff that the
00:35:44.100
left thinks are good arguments. I am pulling this oftentimes from accounts who all they do is repost
00:35:50.580
TikToks from the left that they think were good stuff. This isn't like libs of TikTok in the U.S.
00:35:56.860
where they find ridiculous liberal people posting videos that make them look bad. This is what they
00:36:02.740
think are solid strikes on Polyev and the Conservative Party. Like Lesley and Lewis is hanging out with the
00:36:08.820
AFD and now anything that the AFD has ever been accused of is what the Conservative Party have done.
00:36:14.500
Okay, okay, Frank. Okay. And then the other lady saying they're going to take away your abortions and
00:36:18.660
they're gonna like take away protections or whatever and they're going to take away your
00:36:24.580
abortions from your trans drag queen story hours or whatever. It's like they don't have anything of
00:36:31.680
substance. And then that last lady has the audacity to say that Carney's very specific and Polyev won't
00:36:37.180
talk about his policies. Polyev has been rolling out a new policy every other day. Or I think it's more
00:36:42.160
like every day. Like his new one, his new three-strike policy on crime. They have good policies on mass
00:36:48.160
approval of new resource projects, new building projects. They've been doing a lot. Reducing taxes
00:36:53.200
is something that Polyev announced before Carney did. And then Carney even stole Polyev's policy for
00:36:59.120
getting rid of the carbon tax. Anyways, so that's it for this video, guys. Like the video, subscribe to the
00:37:05.060
channel, leave a comment, do all that great stuff. I know it's a very long video today. Hopefully you'll like that
00:37:10.080
sort of thing. I'll see you guys all next time.