Maxwell Fawcett and The Breakdown are whining about Alberta Premier Danielle Smith banning solar and wind energy installations on prime agricultural land, and they're saying that this is taking away choice from farmers. Not really, because the only reason that farmers are choosing to actually turn their land into solar/wind installations is because of massive subsidization over time. Do you think farmers are doing this because they prefer not to farm, or is it because the government pays massive subsidies and higher energy costs to people who end up providing solar/ wind energy, even if it is very inefficient? It is not efficient energy, but people will take money if you offer it to them. This is why people in Iowa end up turning corn into ethanol.