The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Leftists try and fail to smear Poilievre and Conservatives!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here.

00:00:02.820 You can tell that the Conservative Party and Pierre Polyev have momentum not just from their rallies,

00:00:07.900 but from the fact that the opposition party leaders are all training fire on him.

00:00:13.200 Even Jagmeet Singh is mostly firing on the Conservatives because they are the most likely party to be stealing NDP seats.

00:00:21.140 Mark Carney's taking shots, Jagmeet Singh is taking shots, weird leftist TikTokers and YouTubers are. 0.63

00:00:26.880 I want to go through it all with you guys today, but first, just a reminder guys, if you like my federal election coverage,

00:00:33.940 make sure to like this video, subscribe to the channel if you're not yet a subscriber,

00:00:37.880 I bet about half of you are not subscribers watching this right now,

00:00:41.000 as well as leave a comment guys, really helps us in the algorithm and I really like to go scroll through

00:00:46.000 and see what people are saying about the topic of the day.

00:00:49.540 Anyways, without further ado, let's start off with Jagmeet Singh, the saddest man in this entire election,

00:00:56.180 because nobody is paying attention to him.

00:00:58.840 I am doing a public service for the NDP and Singh right now by even deigning to mention their existence.

00:01:06.680 If you look at the Google Trends charts, it's like basically just Polyev and Carney fighting back and forth for attention,

00:01:13.280 and then every once in a while you see a little boop on the chart showing that people did notice Jagmeet Singh.

00:01:20.180 By the way, do you know what the last thing that got Jagmeet Singh any attention on Google Trends was?

00:01:27.160 It was him campaigning with the OnlyFans girl, as well as taking a photo with guys wearing fetish dog masks.

00:01:35.220 That was the last time people paid attention to Singh up until me making this video right now.

00:01:40.140 But here is Jagmeet Singh trying to attack a conservative candidate and calling for Polyev to drop him.

00:01:45.520 This message is for Pierre Polyev.

00:01:48.140 Pierre, you're being called out for refusing to drop your candidate, Aaron Gunn.

00:01:52.260 He's denied the devastation and harm of residential schools.

00:01:56.520 No, he didn't.

00:01:57.900 He just objectively did not.

00:02:00.060 He is talking realistically about residential schools,

00:02:03.220 that it was not genocide and there are not 215 graves next to the Kamloops residential school.

00:02:10.260 That's just realism.

00:02:11.860 You can still say, hey, residential schools, net negative, big net negative.

00:02:16.620 But it's not denying residential schools to not give in to activists' fantasies,

00:02:22.700 which are really just created to, you know, generate a catalyst for them to get really bad land deals signed

00:02:28.680 and get other sort of concessions from the government.

00:02:31.780 Anyways, I'll let him keep slandering Aaron Gunn for a bit.

00:02:34.360 And defended Putin's attacks on 2SLGBTQ plus people. 0.86

00:02:40.580 25 mayors and councillors from North Island communities.

00:02:43.800 The Union of BC Indian Chiefs.

00:02:46.740 The First Nations Leadership Council.

00:02:49.180 By the way, just flat out far left front group.

00:02:51.800 This same organization has been calling for the charging and potential jailing of sitting BCMLA Dallas Brody

00:03:00.180 for also just saying there are not 215 dead children under the Kamloops residential school.

00:03:05.580 By the way, funny thing is that nobody attacked Aaron Gunn for this until the election came and he was running as a candidate.

00:03:12.400 He said this stuff years ago before he was a candidate and no one made a fuss about it.

00:03:16.600 Because it's true and they had no incentive to use it against him.

00:03:21.200 Now that he's running an election, a bunch of left-wing activists come out of the woodwork to attack him

00:03:26.460 because they want the Liberal or the NDP to win.

00:03:28.980 But that's literally it.

00:03:30.480 That is how shallow this entire story is.

00:03:33.400 And yeah, the other thing about like he endorsed Putin's attack on 2SLGBTQ people. 0.79

00:03:39.120 That's a massive misread.

00:03:40.740 I disagree with some of the things Aaron Gunn said.

00:03:43.220 But these are comments from 11 years ago. 0.92

00:03:46.320 And it was just dumb comments about Russia invading Crimea.

00:03:49.700 You know, there is popular misinformation out there that, you know, the Russians had to invade Crimea. 0.95

00:03:54.620 No, they didn't. 0.98

00:03:55.560 It's just silly.

00:03:56.200 But it's a comment from 11 years ago and we're pretending it was something that was said like five minutes ago.

00:04:01.200 By the way, it was less than 11 years ago that Jagmeet Singh was sitting at a Kalistani rally,

00:04:09.560 sitting at a meeting in San Francisco endorsing terrorism, basically.

00:04:14.140 The man is a radical Sikh separatist and he's going to cast aspersions at something Aaron Gunn had said

00:04:21.660 that's not really that fundamental to Aaron Gunn's character 11 years ago.

00:04:26.020 And the regional chief of the B.C. Assembly of First Nations have called Gunn's comments extremely troubling, blatantly racist and offensive.

00:04:36.500 Okay, those people are lying.

00:04:39.180 That's all I would say.

00:04:40.540 But instead of dropping your candidate, you've attacked these leaders and denied the truth.

00:04:46.160 That's not leadership.

00:04:47.660 It's wrong.

00:04:49.020 Pierre, do the right thing.

00:04:50.960 Apologize and drop Aaron Gunn.

00:04:54.020 He's fighting for relevance so hard right now.

00:04:58.540 The only thing I do want to say about this whole thing, and I've said it in another video, but I just want to repeat it here. 0.91

00:05:03.360 It is so hypocritical. 0.85

00:05:05.640 All of the B.C. conservatives who are supporting Aaron Gunn, who were perfectly fine throwing Dallas Brody under the bus for her literal, exactly the same comments. 0.95

00:05:16.720 In fact, when Dallas Brody was bringing it up, she was doing it in her role as the attorney general critic, trying to stand up and protect B.C. lawyers who are being, like, basically attacked by their own law association for standing up for the truth about the Kamloops residential school.

00:05:31.560 So I have so little time for all the people who justified the cancellation and the woke struggle session against Dallas Brody because it was politically convenient for them to get rid of a blue conservative from the caucus of the B.C. conservative party because it's a bunch of woke, red Tory, B.C. united people who have basically taken over the HQ of that party.

00:05:50.320 But then when it's Aaron Gunn, suddenly we're all going to defend Aaron Gunn.

00:05:53.900 We should, but we should defend both.

00:05:56.820 It's not that hard, guys.

00:05:58.120 It's just called principle and consistency.

00:06:01.100 Anyways, now let's move on to another attack Jagmeet Singh made against pure Polyev because Polyev, and it's a good indication he has a lot of momentum, Polyev is the biggest man in the room right now. 0.92

00:06:13.460 And so Carney isn't really that much of a target.

00:06:16.720 Yeah, Jagmeet Singh has been throwing some punches at Carney, and some of them are not terrible attacks, like him hiding money away on, like, a Caribbean island for Brookfield Asset Management.

00:06:29.180 He's hit him for some other things where Carney's, like, a fake lefty, which I guess that's a good line for the NDP.

00:06:37.540 I don't care if Carney's a lefty or, like, I don't care if he's an insufficient lefty.

00:06:42.340 He's just not on the right.

00:06:43.440 I'd rather vote for the Conservatives, obviously.

00:06:45.340 But he's mostly only been attacking Polyev because it's the only way for Jagmeet Singh to get any attention because Carney's an inherently boring target.

00:06:55.540 And so Jagmeet instead has been mostly firing on the opposition leader, which makes him basically just like a left-wing version of Maxime Bernier. 0.99

00:07:04.120 You're just attacking the people who aren't even in government as your main line politically, which just makes you utterly pathetic. 0.91

00:07:11.380 Like, you're not even willing to attack mainly the people who are already in office. 0.98

00:07:15.760 Wow.

00:07:16.360 And it's like a two-line throwaway letter he wrote of.

00:07:19.460 Right.

00:07:19.880 And he wrote this, like, kind of like attacking unions.

00:07:22.620 It shows you who he really is, right?

00:07:23.980 Like, I'm glad you kept this.

00:07:25.800 This is proof.

00:07:26.440 You know, we know there's lots of proof.

00:07:28.000 But this is another example of him in writing, condemning workers.

00:07:32.120 So we have a letter from, like, who knows how many years ago, the paper's starting to yellow, where Polyev called out labor unions and other types of unions for effectively hurting the economy.

00:07:45.340 By the way, fact check true, the unions are endorsing Polyev right now, not because he endorses typical union behavior.

00:07:55.180 It's because the unions have actually, at least in the private sector, moved to the right, realizing that trying to effectively extort businesses for higher wages and more benefits while the economy is burning down around you is a terrible formula for long-term success.

00:08:10.540 So many of the unions just want a government that respects people who actually work with their hands and wants there to be basically, you know, a lower tax environment for them to exist in.

00:08:21.240 Because union workers also pay taxes.

00:08:23.720 And if anything, they'd be getting more benefits from just lowering taxes across the board than trying to, like, basically exert more benefits and wages out of companies who are already at their limit for what they can pay.

00:08:37.140 We're going to get you a good, we're going to get you a good new Democrat MP.

00:08:39.840 Do you promise that me, Jake?

00:08:40.600 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:08:41.740 Well, we're going to work this out as we can.

00:08:44.160 Like how awkward he is when he's like, when she's asking, do you promise, do you promise he'll get me an NDP MP?

00:08:50.180 And he already knows that that's a complete lie probably wherever this is.

00:08:53.520 Time Alexa was the MP here. 0.77

00:08:55.940 Oh, yeah.

00:08:57.360 I lived away.

00:08:58.220 We got to get you a new Democrat MP so you can be proud of your MP that's going to be fighting for you.

00:09:03.160 That's what we're working for.

00:09:04.440 Okay.

00:09:06.260 He's just so awkward.

00:09:07.480 Usually the thing I say about Jagmeet is that he can sometimes be charismatic, but in this campaign, it's like somebody just, like, sucked his soul out, replaced him with a copy of whatever Mark Carney has in his soul.

00:09:19.340 Here is now Frank Dominic, a leftist YouTuber.

00:09:23.140 We'll do Mark Carney a bit later, his attacks on Polyev.

00:09:25.980 But here is a leftist TikToker trying to attack the conservatives for partnering with an alt-right.

00:09:32.340 And Spotify is unfairly trying to help Polyev and Elon Musk or whatever.

00:09:36.780 Or how about Toby Lukey, the CEO of Shopify?

00:09:39.640 Him and his COO, Kaz Najatian, I'm sure I said both their names wrong, have been vocally supporting Pierre as well as launching an organization called Build Canada, which fancies itself as being the Canadian Doge.

00:09:50.640 They want to bring the ethos and mentality of Doge and the corporate overreach of Elon Musk in American politics.

00:09:55.500 What do you mean corporate overreach?

00:09:58.080 There are people who donated more money in the 2024 election than Elon Musk.

00:10:02.840 It's called unions.

00:10:04.480 Unions are the biggest donors in American politics.

00:10:07.720 Directly into Canada.

00:10:08.800 Not to mention that Kaz's wife is Candace Malcolm, the founder of the alt-right news organization True North News, which...

00:10:14.500 How is it alt-right at all?

00:10:17.340 True North and Juno are extremely normal conservative outlets.

00:10:21.360 Which now goes by the name Juno News.

00:10:24.400 And no, the rebranding hasn't helped them get any better.

00:10:26.680 Candace was granted an exclusive interview with Pierre Poiliev.

00:10:29.600 And if you want a taste for what Juno News reports about, why don't you just look at their headlines?

00:10:33.800 The headline topics listed on their website are, well, not great, including politics, immigration, and crime.

00:10:40.560 How is that bad?

00:10:42.180 Literally, how is that bad?

00:10:43.680 Oh my goodness.

00:10:44.380 They talk about politics, immigration, and crime on this mostly political news website?

00:10:50.220 Right? Shock, gasp, this is the thing.

00:10:55.060 Leftists think people not being leftist is a problem.

00:10:58.380 And that was like the theme of even Jagmeet Singh's attacks on Aaron Gunn and then Polya for standing against like union overreach in the early 2000s.

00:11:06.520 It's like, they're like, oh my goodness, I can't believe these guys are not leftists.

00:11:12.240 It's like, yeah, they're not, Frank.

00:11:15.000 They're not.

00:11:16.260 That's apparently the only important things that they talk about.

00:11:18.380 They also have a polling section, which seems to be dedicated to just saying that the polls that have the liberals in the lead are false.

00:11:24.220 No, that's literally not true.

00:11:26.840 I've seen Candace Malcolm and the people at Juno talking about polls.

00:11:30.800 They will talk about polls positively that have the liberals in the lead.

00:11:34.240 But they're not so gormless as to just endorse polls like Frank Dominic does that have like the liberals like 12 points in the lead.

00:11:44.080 Like Angus Reid and ECOS are just bad pollsters at this point.

00:11:48.040 They have bad sampling methodologies.

00:11:51.500 Do you know how you can tell that they're poor quality?

00:11:54.940 Here is something that you'll even see in the Angus Reid polls.

00:11:57.880 When you look at Angus Reid's poll of how confident those who say they're conservative are in voting conservative, they are far more confident that they're going to be voting conservative than those saying that they're going to be voting liberal.

00:12:11.180 And then when you go deeper and ask people who voted in 2021 for the conservatives who they're going to vote for this time, 90% plus of them are voting conservative.

00:12:20.520 A very, very strong voter retention rate.

00:12:23.780 Usually, if you want to do well in the next election, you want to hold on to more than 80% of your voters.

00:12:29.240 Conservatives hold on to 90% plus of their 2021 voters.

00:12:32.400 So when a poll shows that the liberals are leading by eight points, yet the conservatives are retaining pretty much everyone from last time, and they have visually grown their appeal into different demographic groups and different age brackets, it's nonsensical that somehow everyone still really likes them from last time, and they're finding new voters from the other parties, but the liberals are leading.

00:12:54.500 It just means that you're probably pulling way too many hardcore urban area liberals, and you're not postal code matching this.

00:13:02.520 The best pollsters, Kolosovsky Strategies, Abacus Data, Innovative generally is pretty good.

00:13:09.760 They have a new poll that's like plus eight liberal, which is weird because they just put out one that's like plus two conservative.

00:13:15.760 That might just be an outlier.

00:13:17.440 Polls do not swing like that, but in general, they tend to be the best ones.

00:13:21.420 And you know what they do?

00:13:22.300 They try and weight their polls by the last election's vote.

00:13:26.820 If your party has a very strong last election voter retention, it wouldn't make sense that you are then slipping in support, because at the very least, you are going to be starting off with all of the voters that you had last time.

00:13:39.720 In fact, the conservatives have a better voter retention rate from 2021 than the liberals do.

00:13:45.460 The liberals, who are only holding on to like 82% of their voters from last election, 78%, are somehow doing better than the conservatives, even though in the same polls, if you ask people who didn't even vote in 2021 who they're going to vote for, the conservatives have a massive lead with those people.

00:14:01.320 So somehow, despite growing into no new interest groups of voters, not appealing to the people who didn't vote last time, liberals are still leading in the polls. 0.95

00:14:10.320 That's just called crap methodology.

00:14:13.500 Anyways, going back to Frank Dominic. 0.90

00:14:15.840 Has also used to work for former conservative minister and premier Jason Kenney.

00:14:19.660 And in the past, True North has platformed the founder of the Proud Boys, a group which has now been listed as a terrorist organization.

00:14:26.220 At the same time, we do not have Antifa listed as a terrorist organization.

00:14:30.580 That alone should just tell you is purely political.

00:14:33.360 Are the Proud Boys good?

00:14:34.840 No, I'd probably say no.

00:14:36.480 But it was obviously just political to make them a terrorist group when they really do not meet the qualifications. 0.99

00:14:42.620 It's more of just like, you know, a stupid members club for guys kind of on the alt-right. 0.99

00:14:50.700 That's really it. 0.99

00:14:51.460 And it was not even popular in Canada.

00:14:53.400 Nice association there.

00:14:54.440 During this interview with True North, Gavin McInnes and the True North journalist were making racist jokes and insulting immigrants.

00:15:00.460 Shopify also recently kept up Kanye West's store that was selling shirts with swastikas on it.

00:15:05.180 Because, of course, he was.

00:15:06.380 They took it down, eventually.

00:15:07.740 So they did the right thing, but you're still going to hit them for it.

00:15:11.280 For being hateful, mind you, but for not being authentic commerce.

00:15:14.880 And Shopify also changed some things in their terms of service.

00:15:17.440 Now, they no longer have a prohibition on hate speech or harassment.

00:15:20.600 But sometime this year, they removed that prohibition and many others from their policy.

00:15:25.920 Which now just reads, quote, you can't use Shopify to do anything that's illegal where you do business.

00:15:30.760 And for one more direct connection, here's wife Anna is directly tied to Shopify with the company hosting her new organization called Lead Her Forward in their offices.

00:15:39.400 Okay.

00:15:40.320 Or...

00:15:41.280 I like how, again, like, I don't know what the actual problem here is.

00:15:44.700 It's just nattering.

00:15:46.160 It's just leftist nattering.

00:15:48.440 Well, you know, they don't have a hate speech code anymore.

00:15:51.260 Okay. 1.00

00:15:51.780 It's because it's vague and stupid. 0.99

00:15:53.260 That's why they got rid of it. 0.99

00:15:54.680 Well, they let Kanye West be on their site.

00:15:57.320 And then they eventually took it down.

00:15:58.320 But it still wasn't good enough.

00:16:00.200 Here's another one.

00:16:00.980 This is just demonstrating just how conspiratorial many people on the left are.

00:16:06.300 They will just import American political things into Canada because they got nothing.

00:16:11.680 And here is him talking about Project 2025.

00:16:14.440 Since Chatham Asset Management bought Post Media and other Canadian newspapers, they have exclusively endorsed conservatives.

00:16:22.320 So much for the unbiased media.

00:16:24.040 Chatham also bankrolled the National Enquirer.

00:16:25.900 No one has a problem with unbiased media.

00:16:28.060 People have a problem with media that pretends to be unbiased.

00:16:30.680 Hire a pro-Trump tabloid that would buy up the rights to anti-Trump stories and then bury them so they didn't negatively affect Trump.

00:16:37.060 And what about the Heritage Foundation?

00:16:38.540 They are the creators of Project 2025, which is essentially the policy playbook that Trump is following.

00:16:43.880 He's literally not.

00:16:45.300 Even Trump said he doesn't follow 2025.

00:16:47.220 It's something that the Heritage Institute releases literally every single election.

00:16:53.020 They just put out, like, when Mitt Romney was running as a Republican candidate, they had Project 2012.

00:16:57.440 Well, when John McCain was running in 2008, they had Project 2008.

00:17:02.160 It's literally just their dream book of policies that they like.

00:17:05.620 We also see the links between Pierre and the MAGA movement, calling him Canada's version of Trump and saying that they were identical. 0.89

00:17:11.340 And then there's Kevin O'Leary, who is an investor from Dragon's Den and Shark Tank, known for being, well, a bit of an a**hole.

00:17:17.400 He has been spotted at...

00:17:18.540 The person talking in this video, by the way, is somebody who endorsed Luigi Mangione shooting the United Healthcare CEO to death.

00:17:29.040 Like, he didn't endorse the shooting, but he's going to tell you why people don't feel bad about it and why you shouldn't have to feel bad that a man was shot to death in the middle of the streets.

00:17:38.180 But, you know, oh, he's a... 1.00

00:17:39.920 Kevin O'Leary's a jerk. 1.00

00:17:41.760 He's an a**hole. 1.00

00:17:42.780 It's like, dude, you're in favor of violence. 1.00

00:17:45.800 What are you talking about?

00:17:47.740 You're in favor of Hamas. 0.99

00:17:49.440 ...Fundraisers at Mega Mansions and is also currently known for being a trader who frequents Mar-a-Lago and Fox News to support the idea of Canada becoming the 51st state.

00:17:57.520 Kevin also likes to call our currency the Canadian peso or Trudeau pesos and has frequently lied about the value of the dollar as well as Canada's economic standing.

00:18:04.980 Then there was former Conservative MP...

00:18:06.440 What does that even mean?

00:18:07.340 What did he lie about?

00:18:08.420 Like, cite one thing here.

00:18:09.800 ...Candice Bergen, who has been seen proudly wearing a MAGA hat.

00:18:12.520 And other...

00:18:13.240 Whoa, I can't believe it.

00:18:15.320 Guys, I can't believe it.

00:18:16.400 I guess we can't vote Conservative anymore because Frank Dominic has a photo of Candice Bergen wearing a MAGA hat, who was the interim leader of one bite.

00:18:24.840 Okay.

00:18:26.060 There's nothing here.

00:18:27.280 You know that Kevin O'Leary supports Pierre Polyev, and he has criticized Canada's economy at one point.

00:18:34.460 Okay.

00:18:37.060 Okay.

00:18:37.820 Who cares?

00:18:38.480 Anyways, let's move on to Mark Carney now attacking Pierre Polyev.

00:18:44.000 Effectively, I have to go to another tab here. 0.54

00:18:46.360 But look, he's attacking Pierre Polyev for the most asinine reason I've ever seen. 0.58

00:18:50.180 So, he's going to try and dunk on Pierre Polyev.

00:18:54.540 Because did you know 20 years ago, he had a more senior role than Pierre Polyev did?

00:19:00.800 Stephen Harper appointed me governor of the Bank of Canada.

00:19:02.960 I worked closely with the late and great Jim Flaherty during the financial crisis.

00:19:09.580 We resolved a number of situations.

00:19:12.680 Many people are familiar with that experience.

00:19:14.580 I note that...

00:19:14.960 Jim Flaherty, who he has been trying to steal the credit from for helping sustain Canada's economy during the 2008 market crisis.

00:19:22.960 By the way, the reason why Mark Carney was cited as having done good work back in 2008 is because you know what he did, which he's never done since then?

00:19:31.300 He shut up, and he did his job.

00:19:33.580 He engaged in quantitative easing that Jim Flaherty and Stephen Harper ordered him to do.

00:19:39.040 He did that, and we generally went through the crisis better than other countries did.

00:19:45.380 That was literally it.

00:19:46.540 Since then, he has been basically thinking that he's a genius, and in the UK, was pushing his own Keynesian theories about how the economy should be recovered through Brexit, which destroyed the British economy for several years.

00:20:00.300 Pierre Polyev was not at any of those tables, was not given any of that responsibility.

00:20:04.740 And note further that in subsequent years, he has not gained any responsibility in managing crises or difficult situations.

00:20:15.660 Yeah, it turns out that Harper's government was really good, and there wasn't a lot of crises.

00:20:19.980 So, yeah, Pierre Polyev has gained experience being the housing minister and being on other portfolios when he was in the Harper government, not usually as a minister, but someone who's like a parliamentary secretary or was on committees.

00:20:32.400 He has experience.

00:20:33.500 So, guys, Carney's big dunk here is that Polyev, when he was 28 years old, had a less senior role than Mark Carney when he was 43.

00:20:44.700 Who could guess why?

00:20:45.860 It's almost like he was 28 years old, and you were 43.

00:20:52.140 I know numbers are hard for a man who's an economist like Mark Carney, but it turns out, even if Polyev is an elected official and you were more of a bureaucrat, it's going to be pretty obvious that you're going to be the guy in charge of, like, a big governmental item, where he will sit in the backbench for a while, doing some constituency work before he moves up to other things.

00:21:11.920 Patently ridiculous, but here is a not-so-great moment for Mark Carney during that same press conference where he was called out, rightfully so, for his doublespeak on several issue fronts, including Bill C-69, the pipe that basically what people are calling the No More Pipelines Act that allows activist groups and random individuals to keep challenging pipelines and new energy projects to prevent them from ever getting off the ground.

00:21:38.820 This was asked by a Western Standard journalist, who I think did a great job here.

00:21:43.400 Hi, Jared Yeager here with the Western Standard.

00:21:45.560 So yesterday at your rally, you said Pierre Polyev's plan is to, quote, divide and be conquered.

00:21:50.920 As of now, Canada is reliant on the U.S. to get our own oil from one side of the country to the other.

00:21:55.820 By not repealing Bill C-69 and allowing Quebec to veto a pipeline across Canada, are you not yourself setting up Canada to be divided and conquered?

00:22:04.420 No, absolutely not. In fact, in the premise of your question, you answer it, which is, if we are going to build, and I am a proponent of building big energy infrastructure in this country.

00:22:17.580 So he literally is on tape saying that he wants us to keep our oil on the ground, and he is stumped for oil and gas projects in Brazil and the UAE, while arguing with Pierre Polyv himself in committee as to why Alberta oil and gas projects were not viable.

00:22:32.040 But if we are going to build big energy infrastructure in this country, there is a we in that.

00:22:39.200 It is not imposed. It is not imposed by the federal government. It's not imposed by an opposition politician. It's not imposed by a company.

00:22:46.840 It requires the support of, in the example you gave, in Energy East of Quebec, the other provinces that are affected.

00:22:56.900 It requires the support of the free, prior, and informed consent of First Nations.

00:23:02.620 So that's, that's the exact opposite, which is that, you know, he's actually literally describing dividing up Canadians, being divided through different interest groups, very niche interest groups, being able to stop projects and delay them for endless consultations, for nonsensical environmental reviews,

00:23:27.280 for Quebec just saying it's somehow nasty and wrong for them to put, like, for Alberta to build a pipeline across their territory, so we can actually start to ship oil and gas products to Europe and other jurisdictions.

00:23:40.680 He is literally describing dividing up Canadians between different interest groups, rather than saying, hey, it's in the national interest for companies to be able to build pipelines, for our economy to actually function.

00:23:53.260 And he's like, it's not in the, it's not in the interest of any individual government in Canada, not the federal, it's not the provincial, it's not a company, it actually is the company's business.

00:24:02.320 They want to build a small pipeline from one place to another.

00:24:08.000 It's not having a, like, destroyed giant tracts of land.

00:24:11.980 It is a pipeline that they want to build to, from one place to another, like the railroad is currently built that moves oil and gas into Quebec.

00:24:21.500 For some reason, Quebec politicians are totally fine moving oil and gas into their province through railways that are already there, but a pipeline that is safer and more efficient and reduces emissions, actually, if you do it, that is nasty and wrong.

00:24:37.260 Carney, no, like, this is just incompetence.

00:24:39.880 This is just incompetence to pretend like he is somehow unifying people by letting small, motivated interest groups prevent there being any free market in Canada when they don't like it.

00:24:52.200 Coming together to build.

00:24:53.360 Now, what I've proposed both...

00:24:55.980 We need to come together to build.

00:24:58.020 The bands, the environmental groups, and the Quebec government are not coming together to build anything.

00:25:03.200 They're not building squat.

00:25:04.360 They are just simply holding things up, and once it gets approved, they're not going to, like, help you lay down the pipe.

00:25:10.620 They're just going to walk away with whatever amount of money you gave them.

00:25:13.040 Both at the first minister's level and more broadly, is that we as a country use this crisis to identify those projects of national interest, many of which, not all of which, but many of which are energy infrastructure projects,

00:25:29.000 so that we can get those agreements, so that we can come together and we can accelerate.

00:25:33.720 And last point, with respect to C-69, what I've also been clear about is the ability under C-69, not as it was, but as it is,

00:25:44.940 and the Minister of Natural Resources, Mr. Wilkinson, is here, as it is under his leadership.

00:25:51.400 We have an ability, as it is, we haven't built anything.

00:25:56.980 They're pretending like there's been some new revolution in the implementation of C-69.

00:26:03.080 No.

00:26:03.600 To rely on, as appropriate, impact assessments that are performed at different levels of government,

00:26:11.580 and that is part and parcel of how we can make this work.

00:26:15.740 So, I reject the question, but I hope I've provided some illumination.

00:26:22.660 Thank you.

00:26:23.140 He hasn't.

00:26:23.840 In fact, when he met with Danielle Smith the other day, like a week and a half ago or so, or right before the election,

00:26:30.680 he even promised her he would get rid of Bill C-69, and then he said the opposite in French when he went to Quebec.

00:26:36.740 He's just a hack.

00:26:39.820 That's literally the only takeaway I have here.

00:26:42.520 Now, I just want to do a couple more posts just about just how conspiratorial leftists are at this point who are voting liberal.

00:26:52.240 This guy named JustGus, flags in bio, says,

00:26:57.380 Make no mistake, these three are aligned in their core beliefs.

00:27:00.980 All three prefer Canada to be part of the 51st state.

00:27:06.340 Smith said the quiet part out loud, and Trump has also said he prefers Poliev.

00:27:10.620 He literally hasn't said that.

00:27:12.240 He has literally said the opposite.

00:27:13.700 He prefers Carney.

00:27:14.740 Smith and Poliev are what selling out our country looks like. 0.84

00:27:18.960 What are you talking, and this is where I say that leftists are so much more conspiratorial than people on the right.

00:27:26.800 They're aligned in their core beliefs.

00:27:28.660 You mean they're conservative?

00:27:29.860 Instead of they like small government, oh, I guess if you do that, now you're all bad people.

00:27:35.060 Trump believing in small government makes believing in small government evil for some reason. 0.97

00:27:40.380 So now if you agree with Trump that the sky is blue, you must be some sort of fascist. 1.00

00:27:45.700 This is how stupid – they all want the 51st state. 1.00

00:27:49.380 Who has said that? 1.00

00:27:51.160 Daniel Smith hasn't said it.

00:27:52.820 Poliev has rejected it outright.

00:27:54.420 And in the case of Trump, he's joking. 1.00

00:27:58.520 It's a stupid joke. 0.99

00:28:00.180 That's why he hasn't really mentioned the 51st state thing. 0.99

00:28:02.600 And the only time he does is he makes an offhand remark, well, they'd still be better with us as a 51st state before talking about trade or something like that.

00:28:09.380 And that's it.

00:28:10.160 Anyways, let's move on to this lady who I highlighted the other day. 1.00

00:28:16.080 And every single day she's ranting about nonsense, thinking that this is, like, good content.

00:28:22.840 This is, like, bringing people onside to the liberal cause.

00:28:26.580 I think it's like Laura Babcock here.

00:28:29.080 Canadians have their opinions about the last nine years.

00:28:33.180 I was very critical of Trudeau.

00:28:35.040 Really wanted him to step aside.

00:28:36.840 She was not critical of Trudeau.

00:28:39.260 She wanted him to step aside for purely political reasons, had nothing to do with actual performance.

00:28:44.500 But that's not now.

00:28:46.300 What is now is we have an enemy on the front lawn of our country.

00:28:51.160 And I'm not interested in anyone who wants to be sitting in the backyard bitching. 1.00

00:28:54.640 I'm interested in who's going to be on the front lawn with me and is going to be staring down this bully and is going to fight for Canada and for my future and for my children's future and for the people in our country who are living in poverty.

00:29:09.800 I want somebody on the front lawn who's fighting.

00:29:12.480 And that's Mark Carney.

00:29:13.320 Imagine being on that Zoom call with Leila, like, leaning her forehead forward into you the entire time, talking, like, I want someone who's to fight for our country and for my children's future.

00:29:26.280 You know, let's vote for Mark Carney then, the guy who's not going to change any domestic policies, not going to lower taxes, not make it so that your kids can afford homes, going to flood the country with hundreds of thousands to millions of immigrants every year. 0.98

00:29:38.320 Or, yeah, yeah, that guy's fighting for our country because he's going to put his finger in Donald Trump's chest and tell him what's up.

00:29:45.320 Laura, Laura, get back to earth, Laura.

00:29:49.380 Like, name a domestic policy, name a single domestic policy, any liberal support, name a domestic policy that you think that Carney is head and shoulders above Polly Yvonne.

00:30:02.980 It's a trick question, because right now, Carney's basically running on nothing.

00:30:08.240 The only people, the only thing you could really name at this point that he's running on is his bloated housing program.

00:30:14.320 Let's build $36 billion worth of, like, these, like, snap together houses.

00:30:21.460 Okay, good job, dude.

00:30:23.240 Are you going to lower regulations to make it easier to put up those houses?

00:30:26.060 No?

00:30:26.480 Okay, well, that plan's done.

00:30:27.900 That plan's dead.

00:30:29.000 It's literally the same plan as Trudeau ran on in 2015.

00:30:31.540 You know how many of those houses that they built were?

00:30:35.160 How many had they built?

00:30:36.300 Like, none.

00:30:37.220 They didn't build anything.

00:30:38.240 It's like when Trudeau, for some reason, promised to build or plant, like, 3 billion trees, and we have built zero.

00:30:45.620 I have probably inadvertently planted more trees from accidentally kicking, like, you know, pine cones into the ground or something like that than Justin Trudeau and the team liberal have planted in the entire time they've been in office.

00:30:57.780 Other than that, like, what's he running on?

00:30:59.720 But slightly lowering taxes, under $50,000?

00:31:03.700 Well, Boliev's doing more than double his tax cuts.

00:31:06.200 So what are we talking about?

00:31:08.540 Like, everything he's done is either just doing whatever Trudeau did before, but we're going to do it more this time, apparently, or it's just microwaved conservative policy that he stole pretending he didn't steal it, like getting rid of the carbon tax and capital gains inclusion rate and all that stuff.

00:31:24.720 Has anyone approached Christy Freeland yet and said, does she feel personally insulted by them getting rid of that policy that she apparently dearly loved?

00:31:32.940 Well, she didn't actually dearly love it because it wasn't her policy.

00:31:35.940 It was Carney's policy.

00:31:37.180 And then Carney's pretending that he's bringing a new, fresh look into the government when he's just reversing himself on tons of things.

00:31:44.000 And then his own original policies make absolutely no sense or they don't make sense in terms of how they're going to implement them.

00:31:49.980 Again, you can't build tens of thousands of units of housing in the next, like, decade if you're not willing to get rid of all the extra government regulations that make it impossible to build anything.

00:32:02.600 Because guess what? Carney likes the amount of bloated bureaucracy because know what bloated bureaucracy allows you to do?

00:32:09.680 Hire more bureaucrats who will then vote for and work for the liberal government and its causes.

00:32:16.320 He has no intention of actually making it easier to build, and that is the main thing on housing.

00:32:21.420 Lower immigration and make it easier to build. 0.99

00:32:23.580 He is doing none of those things.

00:32:24.800 In fact, he even sacked Mark Miller, who was the only liberal immigration minister who actually finally lowered immigration by, like, a little bit.

00:32:32.900 He got rid of him because now he has the century initiative guys on his side.

00:32:36.600 So I wouldn't be shocked that he's saying, ooh, the economy's slowing down a bit.

00:32:40.400 Like, turns out we now need the entire population of, like, Kerala, India to be moved into our country or else we're going to all stall out. 1.00

00:32:49.900 We need all of, like, Bangladesh to be moved in here. 1.00

00:32:55.260 We need, like, to have half of Ukraine's population or else we're not going to be able to get our economy moving. 1.00

00:33:02.180 Anyways, so that should be it for me today, guys.

00:33:05.860 Thanks for watching the show.

00:33:07.440 Make sure to like the show.

00:33:08.900 Subscribe to the channel.

00:33:10.020 Leave a comment.

00:33:10.760 Do all that great stuff.

00:33:12.140 And by the way, sign up on my list, my email list I have linked on my website.

00:33:17.360 It's in the description below as well as pinned at the top of the comments.

00:33:20.840 WyattClaveWil.com.

00:33:22.220 In the next set of elections, I want to get more into whenever I see a nomination going on in certain riding, seeing who lives there, who's on the list based on postal codes, and being able to give people a call and tell them good nomination candidates for the conservatives that are in that area.

00:33:36.500 Because going forward, I think that's something that we really need to focus on is making sure that the conservatives go into elections with as many really solid orthodox conservative candidates as possible.

00:33:46.820 The problem with having nominations just kind of canceled for the conservatives is, I would say, way too many consultants, way too many people who are community leaders were thrown in as candidates who are not actually ideologically conservative in any way.

00:34:01.100 And not like, well, they're non-ideological, but they're a business owner.

00:34:04.040 I mean like guys who you don't even know anything about them, and it's just some random dude.

00:34:07.960 It's like, that can be dangerous in a government, having a lot of people who have no real track record of principle, who are then potentially given portfolios that they have no intention of doing anything conservative in.

00:34:19.140 Anyways, so that's it for me today, guys.

00:34:21.880 Thanks for watching the show, and I'll see y'all later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 08, 2025

Leftists try and fail to smear Poilievre and Conservatives!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript