Jagmeet Singh is the saddest man in the entire election because nobody is paying attention to him. He's running against a Conservative candidate, and the opposition party leaders are all training fire on him, but no one even seems to care?
00:03:56.200But it's a comment from 11 years ago and we're pretending it was something that was said like five minutes ago.
00:04:01.200By the way, it was less than 11 years ago that Jagmeet Singh was sitting at a Kalistani rally,
00:04:09.560sitting at a meeting in San Francisco endorsing terrorism, basically.
00:04:14.140The man is a radical Sikh separatist and he's going to cast aspersions at something Aaron Gunn had said
00:04:21.660that's not really that fundamental to Aaron Gunn's character 11 years ago.
00:04:26.020And the regional chief of the B.C. Assembly of First Nations have called Gunn's comments extremely troubling, blatantly racist and offensive.
00:05:05.640All of the B.C. conservatives who are supporting Aaron Gunn, who were perfectly fine throwing Dallas Brody under the bus for her literal, exactly the same comments.
00:05:16.720In fact, when Dallas Brody was bringing it up, she was doing it in her role as the attorney general critic, trying to stand up and protect B.C. lawyers who are being, like, basically attacked by their own law association for standing up for the truth about the Kamloops residential school.
00:05:31.560So I have so little time for all the people who justified the cancellation and the woke struggle session against Dallas Brody because it was politically convenient for them to get rid of a blue conservative from the caucus of the B.C. conservative party because it's a bunch of woke, red Tory, B.C. united people who have basically taken over the HQ of that party.
00:05:50.320But then when it's Aaron Gunn, suddenly we're all going to defend Aaron Gunn.
00:05:58.120It's just called principle and consistency.
00:06:01.100Anyways, now let's move on to another attack Jagmeet Singh made against pure Polyev because Polyev, and it's a good indication he has a lot of momentum, Polyev is the biggest man in the room right now.
00:06:13.460And so Carney isn't really that much of a target.
00:06:16.720Yeah, Jagmeet Singh has been throwing some punches at Carney, and some of them are not terrible attacks, like him hiding money away on, like, a Caribbean island for Brookfield Asset Management.
00:06:29.180He's hit him for some other things where Carney's, like, a fake lefty, which I guess that's a good line for the NDP.
00:06:37.540I don't care if Carney's a lefty or, like, I don't care if he's an insufficient lefty.
00:06:43.440I'd rather vote for the Conservatives, obviously.
00:06:45.340But he's mostly only been attacking Polyev because it's the only way for Jagmeet Singh to get any attention because Carney's an inherently boring target.
00:06:55.540And so Jagmeet instead has been mostly firing on the opposition leader, which makes him basically just like a left-wing version of Maxime Bernier.
00:07:04.120You're just attacking the people who aren't even in government as your main line politically, which just makes you utterly pathetic.
00:07:11.380Like, you're not even willing to attack mainly the people who are already in office.
00:07:26.440You know, we know there's lots of proof.
00:07:28.000But this is another example of him in writing, condemning workers.
00:07:32.120So we have a letter from, like, who knows how many years ago, the paper's starting to yellow, where Polyev called out labor unions and other types of unions for effectively hurting the economy.
00:07:45.340By the way, fact check true, the unions are endorsing Polyev right now, not because he endorses typical union behavior.
00:07:55.180It's because the unions have actually, at least in the private sector, moved to the right, realizing that trying to effectively extort businesses for higher wages and more benefits while the economy is burning down around you is a terrible formula for long-term success.
00:08:10.540So many of the unions just want a government that respects people who actually work with their hands and wants there to be basically, you know, a lower tax environment for them to exist in.
00:08:23.720And if anything, they'd be getting more benefits from just lowering taxes across the board than trying to, like, basically exert more benefits and wages out of companies who are already at their limit for what they can pay.
00:08:37.140We're going to get you a good, we're going to get you a good new Democrat MP.
00:09:07.480Usually the thing I say about Jagmeet is that he can sometimes be charismatic, but in this campaign, it's like somebody just, like, sucked his soul out, replaced him with a copy of whatever Mark Carney has in his soul.
00:09:19.340Here is now Frank Dominic, a leftist YouTuber.
00:09:23.140We'll do Mark Carney a bit later, his attacks on Polyev.
00:09:25.980But here is a leftist TikToker trying to attack the conservatives for partnering with an alt-right.
00:09:32.340And Spotify is unfairly trying to help Polyev and Elon Musk or whatever.
00:09:36.780Or how about Toby Lukey, the CEO of Shopify?
00:09:39.640Him and his COO, Kaz Najatian, I'm sure I said both their names wrong, have been vocally supporting Pierre as well as launching an organization called Build Canada, which fancies itself as being the Canadian Doge.
00:09:50.640They want to bring the ethos and mentality of Doge and the corporate overreach of Elon Musk in American politics.
00:10:44.380They talk about politics, immigration, and crime on this mostly political news website?
00:10:50.220Right? Shock, gasp, this is the thing.
00:10:55.060Leftists think people not being leftist is a problem.
00:10:58.380And that was like the theme of even Jagmeet Singh's attacks on Aaron Gunn and then Polya for standing against like union overreach in the early 2000s.
00:11:06.520It's like, they're like, oh my goodness, I can't believe these guys are not leftists.
00:11:51.500Do you know how you can tell that they're poor quality?
00:11:54.940Here is something that you'll even see in the Angus Reid polls.
00:11:57.880When you look at Angus Reid's poll of how confident those who say they're conservative are in voting conservative, they are far more confident that they're going to be voting conservative than those saying that they're going to be voting liberal.
00:12:11.180And then when you go deeper and ask people who voted in 2021 for the conservatives who they're going to vote for this time, 90% plus of them are voting conservative.
00:12:20.520A very, very strong voter retention rate.
00:12:23.780Usually, if you want to do well in the next election, you want to hold on to more than 80% of your voters.
00:12:29.240Conservatives hold on to 90% plus of their 2021 voters.
00:12:32.400So when a poll shows that the liberals are leading by eight points, yet the conservatives are retaining pretty much everyone from last time, and they have visually grown their appeal into different demographic groups and different age brackets, it's nonsensical that somehow everyone still really likes them from last time, and they're finding new voters from the other parties, but the liberals are leading.
00:12:54.500It just means that you're probably pulling way too many hardcore urban area liberals, and you're not postal code matching this.
00:13:02.520The best pollsters, Kolosovsky Strategies, Abacus Data, Innovative generally is pretty good.
00:13:09.760They have a new poll that's like plus eight liberal, which is weird because they just put out one that's like plus two conservative.
00:13:22.300They try and weight their polls by the last election's vote.
00:13:26.820If your party has a very strong last election voter retention, it wouldn't make sense that you are then slipping in support, because at the very least, you are going to be starting off with all of the voters that you had last time.
00:13:39.720In fact, the conservatives have a better voter retention rate from 2021 than the liberals do.
00:13:45.460The liberals, who are only holding on to like 82% of their voters from last election, 78%, are somehow doing better than the conservatives, even though in the same polls, if you ask people who didn't even vote in 2021 who they're going to vote for, the conservatives have a massive lead with those people.
00:14:01.320So somehow, despite growing into no new interest groups of voters, not appealing to the people who didn't vote last time, liberals are still leading in the polls.
00:15:07.740So they did the right thing, but you're still going to hit them for it.
00:15:11.280For being hateful, mind you, but for not being authentic commerce.
00:15:14.880And Shopify also changed some things in their terms of service.
00:15:17.440Now, they no longer have a prohibition on hate speech or harassment.
00:15:20.600But sometime this year, they removed that prohibition and many others from their policy.
00:15:25.920Which now just reads, quote, you can't use Shopify to do anything that's illegal where you do business.
00:15:30.760And for one more direct connection, here's wife Anna is directly tied to Shopify with the company hosting her new organization called Lead Her Forward in their offices.
00:17:18.540The person talking in this video, by the way, is somebody who endorsed Luigi Mangione shooting the United Healthcare CEO to death.
00:17:29.040Like, he didn't endorse the shooting, but he's going to tell you why people don't feel bad about it and why you shouldn't have to feel bad that a man was shot to death in the middle of the streets.
00:17:49.440...Fundraisers at Mega Mansions and is also currently known for being a trader who frequents Mar-a-Lago and Fox News to support the idea of Canada becoming the 51st state.
00:17:57.520Kevin also likes to call our currency the Canadian peso or Trudeau pesos and has frequently lied about the value of the dollar as well as Canada's economic standing.
00:18:04.980Then there was former Conservative MP...
00:18:16.400I guess we can't vote Conservative anymore because Frank Dominic has a photo of Candice Bergen wearing a MAGA hat, who was the interim leader of one bite.
00:19:14.960Jim Flaherty, who he has been trying to steal the credit from for helping sustain Canada's economy during the 2008 market crisis.
00:19:22.960By the way, the reason why Mark Carney was cited as having done good work back in 2008 is because you know what he did, which he's never done since then?
00:19:46.540Since then, he has been basically thinking that he's a genius, and in the UK, was pushing his own Keynesian theories about how the economy should be recovered through Brexit, which destroyed the British economy for several years.
00:20:00.300Pierre Polyev was not at any of those tables, was not given any of that responsibility.
00:20:04.740And note further that in subsequent years, he has not gained any responsibility in managing crises or difficult situations.
00:20:15.660Yeah, it turns out that Harper's government was really good, and there wasn't a lot of crises.
00:20:19.980So, yeah, Pierre Polyev has gained experience being the housing minister and being on other portfolios when he was in the Harper government, not usually as a minister, but someone who's like a parliamentary secretary or was on committees.
00:20:45.860It's almost like he was 28 years old, and you were 43.
00:20:52.140I know numbers are hard for a man who's an economist like Mark Carney, but it turns out, even if Polyev is an elected official and you were more of a bureaucrat, it's going to be pretty obvious that you're going to be the guy in charge of, like, a big governmental item, where he will sit in the backbench for a while, doing some constituency work before he moves up to other things.
00:21:11.920Patently ridiculous, but here is a not-so-great moment for Mark Carney during that same press conference where he was called out, rightfully so, for his doublespeak on several issue fronts, including Bill C-69, the pipe that basically what people are calling the No More Pipelines Act that allows activist groups and random individuals to keep challenging pipelines and new energy projects to prevent them from ever getting off the ground.
00:21:38.820This was asked by a Western Standard journalist, who I think did a great job here.
00:21:43.400Hi, Jared Yeager here with the Western Standard.
00:21:45.560So yesterday at your rally, you said Pierre Polyev's plan is to, quote, divide and be conquered.
00:21:50.920As of now, Canada is reliant on the U.S. to get our own oil from one side of the country to the other.
00:21:55.820By not repealing Bill C-69 and allowing Quebec to veto a pipeline across Canada, are you not yourself setting up Canada to be divided and conquered?
00:22:04.420No, absolutely not. In fact, in the premise of your question, you answer it, which is, if we are going to build, and I am a proponent of building big energy infrastructure in this country.
00:22:17.580So he literally is on tape saying that he wants us to keep our oil on the ground, and he is stumped for oil and gas projects in Brazil and the UAE, while arguing with Pierre Polyv himself in committee as to why Alberta oil and gas projects were not viable.
00:22:32.040But if we are going to build big energy infrastructure in this country, there is a we in that.
00:22:39.200It is not imposed. It is not imposed by the federal government. It's not imposed by an opposition politician. It's not imposed by a company.
00:22:46.840It requires the support of, in the example you gave, in Energy East of Quebec, the other provinces that are affected.
00:22:56.900It requires the support of the free, prior, and informed consent of First Nations.
00:23:02.620So that's, that's the exact opposite, which is that, you know, he's actually literally describing dividing up Canadians, being divided through different interest groups, very niche interest groups, being able to stop projects and delay them for endless consultations, for nonsensical environmental reviews,
00:23:27.280for Quebec just saying it's somehow nasty and wrong for them to put, like, for Alberta to build a pipeline across their territory, so we can actually start to ship oil and gas products to Europe and other jurisdictions.
00:23:40.680He is literally describing dividing up Canadians between different interest groups, rather than saying, hey, it's in the national interest for companies to be able to build pipelines, for our economy to actually function.
00:23:53.260And he's like, it's not in the, it's not in the interest of any individual government in Canada, not the federal, it's not the provincial, it's not a company, it actually is the company's business.
00:24:02.320They want to build a small pipeline from one place to another.
00:24:08.000It's not having a, like, destroyed giant tracts of land.
00:24:11.980It is a pipeline that they want to build to, from one place to another, like the railroad is currently built that moves oil and gas into Quebec.
00:24:21.500For some reason, Quebec politicians are totally fine moving oil and gas into their province through railways that are already there, but a pipeline that is safer and more efficient and reduces emissions, actually, if you do it, that is nasty and wrong.
00:24:37.260Carney, no, like, this is just incompetence.
00:24:39.880This is just incompetence to pretend like he is somehow unifying people by letting small, motivated interest groups prevent there being any free market in Canada when they don't like it.
00:25:04.360They are just simply holding things up, and once it gets approved, they're not going to, like, help you lay down the pipe.
00:25:10.620They're just going to walk away with whatever amount of money you gave them.
00:25:13.040Both at the first minister's level and more broadly, is that we as a country use this crisis to identify those projects of national interest, many of which, not all of which, but many of which are energy infrastructure projects,
00:25:29.000so that we can get those agreements, so that we can come together and we can accelerate.
00:25:33.720And last point, with respect to C-69, what I've also been clear about is the ability under C-69, not as it was, but as it is,
00:25:44.940and the Minister of Natural Resources, Mr. Wilkinson, is here, as it is under his leadership.
00:25:51.400We have an ability, as it is, we haven't built anything.
00:25:56.980They're pretending like there's been some new revolution in the implementation of C-69.
00:28:00.180That's why he hasn't really mentioned the 51st state thing.
00:28:02.600And the only time he does is he makes an offhand remark, well, they'd still be better with us as a 51st state before talking about trade or something like that.
00:28:46.300What is now is we have an enemy on the front lawn of our country.
00:28:51.160And I'm not interested in anyone who wants to be sitting in the backyard bitching.
00:28:54.640I'm interested in who's going to be on the front lawn with me and is going to be staring down this bully and is going to fight for Canada and for my future and for my children's future and for the people in our country who are living in poverty.
00:29:09.800I want somebody on the front lawn who's fighting.
00:29:13.320Imagine being on that Zoom call with Leila, like, leaning her forehead forward into you the entire time, talking, like, I want someone who's to fight for our country and for my children's future.
00:29:26.280You know, let's vote for Mark Carney then, the guy who's not going to change any domestic policies, not going to lower taxes, not make it so that your kids can afford homes, going to flood the country with hundreds of thousands to millions of immigrants every year.
00:29:38.320Or, yeah, yeah, that guy's fighting for our country because he's going to put his finger in Donald Trump's chest and tell him what's up.
00:29:45.320Laura, Laura, get back to earth, Laura.
00:29:49.380Like, name a domestic policy, name a single domestic policy, any liberal support, name a domestic policy that you think that Carney is head and shoulders above Polly Yvonne.
00:30:02.980It's a trick question, because right now, Carney's basically running on nothing.
00:30:08.240The only people, the only thing you could really name at this point that he's running on is his bloated housing program.
00:30:38.240It's like when Trudeau, for some reason, promised to build or plant, like, 3 billion trees, and we have built zero.
00:30:45.620I have probably inadvertently planted more trees from accidentally kicking, like, you know, pine cones into the ground or something like that than Justin Trudeau and the team liberal have planted in the entire time they've been in office.
00:30:57.780Other than that, like, what's he running on?
00:30:59.720But slightly lowering taxes, under $50,000?
00:31:03.700Well, Boliev's doing more than double his tax cuts.
00:31:08.540Like, everything he's done is either just doing whatever Trudeau did before, but we're going to do it more this time, apparently, or it's just microwaved conservative policy that he stole pretending he didn't steal it, like getting rid of the carbon tax and capital gains inclusion rate and all that stuff.
00:31:24.720Has anyone approached Christy Freeland yet and said, does she feel personally insulted by them getting rid of that policy that she apparently dearly loved?
00:31:32.940Well, she didn't actually dearly love it because it wasn't her policy.
00:31:37.180And then Carney's pretending that he's bringing a new, fresh look into the government when he's just reversing himself on tons of things.
00:31:44.000And then his own original policies make absolutely no sense or they don't make sense in terms of how they're going to implement them.
00:31:49.980Again, you can't build tens of thousands of units of housing in the next, like, decade if you're not willing to get rid of all the extra government regulations that make it impossible to build anything.
00:32:02.600Because guess what? Carney likes the amount of bloated bureaucracy because know what bloated bureaucracy allows you to do?
00:32:09.680Hire more bureaucrats who will then vote for and work for the liberal government and its causes.
00:32:16.320He has no intention of actually making it easier to build, and that is the main thing on housing.
00:32:21.420Lower immigration and make it easier to build.
00:32:24.800In fact, he even sacked Mark Miller, who was the only liberal immigration minister who actually finally lowered immigration by, like, a little bit.
00:32:32.900He got rid of him because now he has the century initiative guys on his side.
00:32:36.600So I wouldn't be shocked that he's saying, ooh, the economy's slowing down a bit.
00:32:40.400Like, turns out we now need the entire population of, like, Kerala, India to be moved into our country or else we're going to all stall out.
00:32:49.900We need all of, like, Bangladesh to be moved in here.
00:32:55.260We need, like, to have half of Ukraine's population or else we're not going to be able to get our economy moving.
00:33:02.180Anyways, so that should be it for me today, guys.
00:33:22.220In the next set of elections, I want to get more into whenever I see a nomination going on in certain riding, seeing who lives there, who's on the list based on postal codes, and being able to give people a call and tell them good nomination candidates for the conservatives that are in that area.
00:33:36.500Because going forward, I think that's something that we really need to focus on is making sure that the conservatives go into elections with as many really solid orthodox conservative candidates as possible.
00:33:46.820The problem with having nominations just kind of canceled for the conservatives is, I would say, way too many consultants, way too many people who are community leaders were thrown in as candidates who are not actually ideologically conservative in any way.
00:34:01.100And not like, well, they're non-ideological, but they're a business owner.
00:34:04.040I mean like guys who you don't even know anything about them, and it's just some random dude.
00:34:07.960It's like, that can be dangerous in a government, having a lot of people who have no real track record of principle, who are then potentially given portfolios that they have no intention of doing anything conservative in.
00:34:19.140Anyways, so that's it for me today, guys.
00:34:21.880Thanks for watching the show, and I'll see y'all later.