The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Liberal attacks on Poilievre keep getting DUMBER!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here.

00:00:02.840 One of the very frustrating things about this Canadian federal election, at least for me,

00:00:07.720 has been watching so many people who are planning on voting Liberal

00:00:11.120 buying into the very shallow attacks from the Liberal Party on Pierre Polyev and the Conservatives.

00:00:17.580 Frankly, if someone is planning on voting Liberal,

00:00:20.520 they should be confronted with the fact that the Liberals have been mostly just making

00:00:24.260 shallow, petty personal attacks on Pierre Polyev the entire time,

00:00:27.760 while the Conservatives have mostly been going after Mark Carney and the Liberals

00:00:31.880 for their record in government, as well as what they plan to do with a fourth term.

00:00:37.480 I think those two things contrast very well for the Conservatives.

00:00:41.420 They are focused on policy and results.

00:00:43.940 The Liberals are focused on vague connections to Donald Trump

00:00:47.180 and going after the Conservatives for things that they are obviously not going to do.

00:00:52.100 Every single federal election since Trudeau has been around and now with Mark Carney,

00:00:56.100 the Liberals have pretended that the Conservatives are planning on cutting your CPP,

00:01:01.220 getting rid of public health care, and they're also going to push your mother down the stairs 1.00

00:01:05.520 just for good measure.

00:01:07.220 It's maddening that this actually does work on a certain type of voter

00:01:10.920 who sits around watching way too much legacy media,

00:01:14.300 where the talking heads repeat this over and over again, as if it's even close to reality.

00:01:19.600 Have you ever seen a party in Canadian history run against health care,

00:01:25.700 running against spending more on health care?

00:01:27.940 There has never been a party in existence in Canada that actually ran on cutting health care spending.

00:01:34.300 They have never ran on cutting CPP or raising the retirement age.

00:01:39.500 It's never happened.

00:01:40.820 Yet there is a large portion of people who will vote Liberal because we got to defend public health care

00:01:45.240 from this imagined demon who's coming to just slash it all and ban people from seeing a doctor.

00:01:52.260 My goodness.

00:01:53.340 But I want to go over some of this stuff with you guys today because it's frustrating for me

00:01:57.480 and it's probably frustrating for you.

00:01:59.140 So I want to work our way through it just so we can kind of digest the ridiculousness of it.

00:02:04.380 And again, if you have any people who are voting Liberal in your life,

00:02:08.620 ask them about the contrast between how the Conservatives critique the Liberals

00:02:13.040 and Liberals critique the Conservatives.

00:02:15.280 Because I think it's very enlightening to look at that for many people

00:02:18.720 and realize that they're voting for the party who is effectively running for class president

00:02:23.200 by saying that they're going to ban homework.

00:02:25.740 My goodness.

00:02:26.820 Anyways, before I get into this, guys, make sure to hit the like button on this video

00:02:30.580 if you've been liking my federal election coverage,

00:02:33.060 subscribe to the channel if you are not yet a subscriber,

00:02:35.900 and leave a comment on the topic of the day,

00:02:38.760 what has been the most frustrating attack on the Conservatives from the Liberals in your opinion.

00:02:44.120 Anyways, here is a video of Mark Carney critiquing the Conservatives' platform,

00:02:48.800 and it seems like it's actually going to be substantive.

00:02:51.480 He's going after the platform.

00:02:52.840 What's in the platform that is so offensive to Mark Carney?

00:02:56.380 And it's very shallow, as we are going to see.

00:02:59.040 The Conservative plan makes it up.

00:03:02.680 It literally makes it up.

00:03:03.900 It says that growth will come from somewhere,

00:03:10.200 even though there's no plan to address the biggest risk to our economy, the U.S.

00:03:14.800 Those two things don't actually match up.

00:03:18.460 That's not a critique.

00:03:20.160 How are they going to get the growth

00:03:22.340 if they don't address the biggest threat to our economy, the United States?

00:03:27.000 One, the Conservative platform does.

00:03:29.180 It talks about its counter-tariff plans and whatnot.

00:03:32.780 But the main thing, the main reason the Conservatives can be confident there will be economic growth

00:03:37.480 is because they are going to cut regulations, taxes,

00:03:40.740 and they are going to fast-track new national resource projects.

00:03:44.220 It would be impossible doing those things to not achieve higher growth.

00:03:48.200 But he's just pretending because they're not addressing Donald Trump,

00:03:51.960 the Conservatives can't achieve growth.

00:03:54.580 That's not...

00:03:55.720 It's hard for me to even state how much that doesn't make sense.

00:03:59.560 Those two things are different topics.

00:04:03.100 You can achieve growth while...

00:04:08.080 Again, it's one of those things where it doesn't even track at all.

00:04:13.060 It's like saying,

00:04:14.080 how are the Conservatives going to achieve growth

00:04:16.260 if they're not going to get to 2% NATO spending by 2030?

00:04:21.740 Different topics?

00:04:22.780 I don't know how those two things come together.

00:04:26.300 Even though their tax cut doesn't arrive for four years.

00:04:29.220 Even though their...

00:04:30.020 It does.

00:04:30.640 It just gets phased in,

00:04:31.800 and it's far larger than the Liberals' tax cut.

00:04:35.800 Costing numbers are far too low.

00:04:39.100 Even though their reductions in spending don't appear.

00:04:45.540 You could make that criticism of any budget.

00:04:52.140 Every party tends to put out an idealist version

00:04:54.560 of how much money they're going to spend on different things

00:04:56.840 and how they're going to find savings.

00:04:59.100 Carney, in his own budget,

00:05:00.480 where he wants to add $130 billion of new spending over four years

00:05:04.200 to what Trudeau was already doing.

00:05:06.180 In fact, this is effectively just Trudeau's 2025 platform

00:05:09.020 that they controlled F'd and just removed the name Justin Trudeau

00:05:12.940 and replaced it with Mark Carnian.

00:05:14.660 In his platform,

00:05:15.880 they're expecting to find $28 billion in savings through efficiencies

00:05:20.680 in order to offset the cost of the new spending.

00:05:24.300 Have you ever seen this government,

00:05:26.240 especially when he was the economic advisor for the past five years,

00:05:30.200 find big efficiencies?

00:05:31.700 They haven't.

00:05:32.880 They just haven't.

00:05:34.300 His numbers are far more fantastical than the Conservatives,

00:05:38.040 but they're going after the Conservatives

00:05:39.220 because a bunch of their money in the budget

00:05:41.540 is from tariffs.

00:05:44.080 They're going to put counter tariffs on

00:05:45.840 and $20 billion over four years

00:05:47.600 is going to come from those tariffs.

00:05:49.400 Yes, but the whole point is that

00:05:50.660 if those tariffs don't get put into place,

00:05:53.300 if the trade issue resolves itself,

00:05:55.040 a bunch of the things that the Conservatives

00:05:56.560 are committing to spending money on

00:05:58.000 are no longer required

00:05:59.400 because it was only going to be required

00:06:01.500 if there was a trade war.

00:06:03.260 So a bunch of that money was like a contingency plan.

00:06:06.440 So if the trade war started up,

00:06:08.080 they would spend the $20 billion on that

00:06:10.680 and they would get it through tariff revenues.

00:06:12.960 If that doesn't happen,

00:06:13.960 they don't need the $20 billion in revenue

00:06:15.720 to pay for the $20 billion in relief.

00:06:18.240 I don't know why I have to explain this.

00:06:20.840 So now let's move on to some other clips,

00:06:23.660 some other posts that the liberals

00:06:25.580 and liberal influencers have been making

00:06:27.640 to attack the Conservatives.

00:06:28.920 Here is this lady, Laura Babcock,

00:06:32.720 a big Trudeau and Carney fan,

00:06:35.460 attacking the Conservatives

00:06:36.460 because they've been getting endorsements

00:06:38.560 from police associations and unions.

00:06:41.100 So down here, you can see breaking.

00:06:42.780 Toronto Police Association endorses Pierre Polyev.

00:06:46.000 And above, Laura Babcock says,

00:06:49.100 this mega S makes me sick.

00:06:51.580 Forget about the separation of church and state.

00:06:54.140 We can't even keep the separation

00:06:55.840 of Conservatives and cops.

00:06:57.240 Sorry, was that ever a thing?

00:06:59.560 Were cops not allowed to have opinions

00:07:02.200 on which criminal justice plan they like better?

00:07:05.940 That seems pretty straightforward to me.

00:07:08.360 So apparently, this is Donald Trump

00:07:11.260 make America great again stuff

00:07:12.920 because the police,

00:07:15.100 the many police associations around Canada,

00:07:18.180 like Polyev's plan on criminal justice

00:07:20.500 better than the liberals' plan.

00:07:23.220 If it goes without saying,

00:07:25.340 if the liberals got the endorsement

00:07:27.940 and the Conservatives did not,

00:07:30.060 Laura Babcock would be entirely okay with it

00:07:32.860 because I've never seen anyone on the left

00:07:36.140 ever say separation of, you know,

00:07:39.240 like of politics and police

00:07:41.160 or whatever she was going on about.

00:07:42.720 What was that line she was using?

00:07:44.020 She said separation of Conservatives and cops.

00:07:46.620 I've literally never heard that line

00:07:48.780 before Laura Babcock.

00:07:49.880 So she's just making up

00:07:52.380 some sort of like offense

00:07:54.100 to be offended at

00:07:55.440 because it doesn't go the liberals' way.

00:07:58.380 That is it.

00:07:59.040 This is another, again,

00:08:00.100 shallow attack on the Conservatives.

00:08:02.900 Here's another one.

00:08:05.220 Here's him going after Mark Carney,

00:08:07.200 going after Pierre Polly,

00:08:08.140 for being a Donald Trump copycat.

00:08:10.020 All of this stuff is silly

00:08:12.900 because if you take a Conservative

00:08:14.680 from any part of the world,

00:08:16.660 if you take a Conservative

00:08:17.820 from Myanmar and you,

00:08:19.800 or maybe not Myanmar,

00:08:20.740 but you get my point,

00:08:21.480 like if you take a Conservative

00:08:22.860 from Nepal

00:08:23.640 and you contrast it

00:08:25.520 with a Conservative

00:08:26.200 from Peru

00:08:27.000 and then Canada

00:08:27.880 and then the UK

00:08:28.740 and then Spain,

00:08:30.000 they are going to sound the same

00:08:31.260 on a lot of issues

00:08:32.140 because Conservatism

00:08:34.020 is an ideology.

00:08:35.660 And outside of places

00:08:36.600 where Conservatism means

00:08:37.720 a very different thing,

00:08:38.740 like, again,

00:08:39.560 I actually brought up

00:08:40.500 Myanmar for a reason 1.00

00:08:41.440 because Conservatives

00:08:42.180 might mean like an Islamist

00:08:43.760 or something like that.

00:08:44.800 Generally, Conservatives

00:08:45.560 are going to be like free market.

00:08:47.760 They're going to want

00:08:48.580 generally smaller government,

00:08:50.200 less regulations.

00:08:51.580 They're not going to like

00:08:52.400 social progressivism overall

00:08:54.380 or at least state-enforced

00:08:55.840 social progressivism

00:08:56.880 in certain institutions.

00:08:58.540 So when they keep saying,

00:09:00.300 oh, he's copying Trump,

00:09:01.140 like, you mean they're Conservatives?

00:09:02.920 They aren't even exactly alike.

00:09:04.560 There's not many people

00:09:05.340 on planet Earth

00:09:06.580 like Donald Trump.

00:09:07.400 But acting like,

00:09:09.100 oh my goodness,

00:09:09.560 these two people are the same.

00:09:10.980 If you're being honest,

00:09:11.740 you'd be like,

00:09:12.220 oh my goodness,

00:09:12.740 these two people are Conservatives.

00:09:16.420 You have to distinguish

00:09:17.740 between what you can change

00:09:20.320 and what you can't.

00:09:22.720 What you can change

00:09:23.900 and what you can.

00:09:25.220 And after 78 years,

00:09:27.220 I don't think we can change

00:09:28.920 President Trump.

00:09:29.720 So what we need,

00:09:33.940 what we need is a leader

00:09:35.860 and a party that can stand up to him.

00:09:41.240 By the way,

00:09:44.160 a lot of liberals should be asked

00:09:45.620 about their criticism of Polly

00:09:47.880 for using too many slogans.

00:09:49.900 Is Carney not full

00:09:51.140 of just more platitudes?

00:09:53.740 His entire rallies,

00:09:54.620 I've had people go to them.

00:09:55.840 I've watched them.

00:09:56.520 It is a lot of this.

00:09:57.680 We need to stand up.

00:09:59.060 And we can't stand up weakly.

00:10:00.720 We must stand up strong.

00:10:02.440 We will never be the United States.

00:10:04.860 It's ridiculous.

00:10:05.500 It's ridiculous.

00:10:05.700 That is not,

00:10:14.300 that leader is not

00:10:15.460 Pierre Polyev.

00:10:17.380 No.

00:10:19.400 He draws his inspiration.

00:10:21.840 He draws his inspiration

00:10:23.080 from President Trump.

00:10:24.380 He copies his ideas.

00:10:26.340 His first instinct,

00:10:28.240 Polyev's first instinct 0.96

00:10:29.340 when our nation was attacked

00:10:31.060 was to call Canada stupid.

00:10:34.140 That didn't happen.

00:10:38.140 I hate this.

00:10:39.300 This has been one

00:10:40.120 of the dumbest lines.

00:10:40.960 They've literally made billboards

00:10:42.200 out of it,

00:10:42.960 saying that Polyev said,

00:10:44.600 it's not the Americans' fault.

00:10:47.100 Canada's stupid. 0.76

00:10:48.180 And he's making the point

00:10:49.680 that Canada has been losing

00:10:52.340 on trade

00:10:53.240 and losing economic power

00:10:55.060 to the US

00:10:55.980 for years now.

00:10:57.400 And it's not because

00:10:58.380 the Americans have been stealing it. 0.83

00:10:59.780 It's because the Canadian, 0.54

00:11:01.700 like,

00:11:02.060 policy in Canada

00:11:03.100 sucks for economic growth.

00:11:05.000 It sucks for businesses.

00:11:06.120 It sucks for natural resources.

00:11:07.520 That's his point.

00:11:08.180 And he,

00:11:09.440 and Carney

00:11:10.080 has this lie

00:11:11.540 where, like,

00:11:12.220 Polyev was basically saying,

00:11:13.340 oh, yeah,

00:11:13.560 the Americans are right

00:11:14.660 on the trade issue.

00:11:15.600 That's not been his point.

00:11:17.240 His point is that,

00:11:18.380 overall,

00:11:18.820 if you are looking

00:11:19.620 at the economic problems

00:11:20.820 of Canada,

00:11:21.320 it really doesn't have

00:11:23.080 to do with the United States.

00:11:24.480 It has to do

00:11:25.060 with domestic policy.

00:11:26.980 It was our fault.

00:11:30.540 He even chooses,

00:11:31.600 Pierre Polyev even chooses

00:11:32.920 to be willfully blind

00:11:34.600 to the growing threats

00:11:36.320 facing Canada

00:11:37.160 by refusing,

00:11:39.280 for some reason,

00:11:41.520 to get his security clearance.

00:11:45.540 The stupid security,

00:11:46.900 didn't he get bodied enough

00:11:48.620 during the debate on this?

00:11:50.200 He asked Pierre Polyev

00:11:51.720 as his chance

00:11:52.800 to put a question to him

00:11:54.100 about not getting

00:11:55.000 the security clearance.

00:11:56.460 And, dude,

00:11:58.000 Carney looked pretty sour

00:11:59.440 a couple seconds

00:12:00.580 into Polyev's answer

00:12:01.700 because he started

00:12:02.460 going after Carney

00:12:03.340 for the fact that,

00:12:04.220 one, if he took

00:12:04.760 the security clearance,

00:12:05.640 he wouldn't be able

00:12:06.260 to speak about

00:12:07.420 Chinese foreign interference

00:12:08.600 in the election,

00:12:09.620 and that Carney refused

00:12:11.260 to get rid of his

00:12:12.320 pro-CCP candidate

00:12:13.560 who was talking

00:12:14.420 about having

00:12:15.340 a conservative

00:12:16.020 locked up

00:12:17.160 by the Chinese

00:12:18.320 Communist Party

00:12:19.060 because he had a bounty

00:12:19.900 on his head back

00:12:20.700 in, like, Hong Kong.

00:12:22.600 Did he do anything criminal?

00:12:24.100 No, unless you think

00:12:25.140 supporting democracy

00:12:26.120 is criminal

00:12:26.740 and organizing

00:12:27.780 some protests.

00:12:29.100 That is why

00:12:30.540 there is a million-dollar,

00:12:32.080 Hong Kong-dollar bounty

00:12:33.220 on Joe Tay's head

00:12:34.240 who Carney's candidate,

00:12:36.540 Paul Chang,

00:12:37.920 had basically told people

00:12:39.380 who should be arrested

00:12:40.440 and brought

00:12:41.040 to the Chinese consulate.

00:12:42.960 He refused

00:12:44.040 to get rid of Paul Chang.

00:12:45.760 And Carney is still

00:12:47.220 bringing up this issue

00:12:47.960 even though he got

00:12:48.640 absolutely roasted

00:12:50.300 during the debate

00:12:51.300 for bringing it up.

00:12:52.060 And here's something

00:12:53.560 I wanted to just

00:12:54.640 highlight here

00:12:55.300 because I thought

00:12:55.820 it was funny.

00:12:57.120 So here is a liberal

00:12:58.540 attack on Polyev

00:13:00.840 that they just posted

00:13:01.660 a few hours ago.

00:13:02.520 Then I want to contrast

00:13:03.300 it with something funny

00:13:04.380 that somebody posted.

00:13:06.100 So the liberals say,

00:13:06.880 Pierre Polyev is following

00:13:08.020 Trump's playbook.

00:13:09.580 I hate the stupid

00:13:10.920 playbook line.

00:13:11.900 People say,

00:13:12.620 oh, you've done something?

00:13:13.620 It's from this guy's

00:13:14.500 playbook.

00:13:15.480 Is it wrong?

00:13:17.040 Here it is.

00:13:17.680 There's a headline

00:13:18.820 from the Wall Street Journal

00:13:19.800 or an excerpt.

00:13:20.520 It says he supported

00:13:21.840 truckers who blockaded

00:13:23.040 Ottawa in 2022

00:13:24.080 to protest COVID-19

00:13:25.540 lockdowns.

00:13:26.600 He promised to slash taxes,

00:13:28.280 shrink the government,

00:13:29.560 end liberals,

00:13:30.520 climate change policies,

00:13:31.580 and end wokeism

00:13:32.240 in Canadian military.

00:13:33.760 His election slogans

00:13:34.800 such as Canada First

00:13:35.700 echo Trump's.

00:13:37.700 The liberals have said

00:13:38.560 Canada First in the past.

00:13:40.320 Is that wrong?

00:13:42.300 Did he say America First?

00:13:43.900 If he said America First,

00:13:45.220 that might be a problem

00:13:46.240 because he's running

00:13:46.960 to be the prime minister

00:13:48.180 of Canada.

00:13:49.320 But now it is a problem

00:13:50.500 to say Canada First

00:13:52.060 in Canada.

00:13:54.740 And sorry,

00:13:55.500 what's wrong

00:13:56.180 with some of this stuff?

00:13:56.860 He was supporting

00:13:57.460 the truckers

00:13:58.580 who are going to be

00:13:59.780 prevented from being,

00:14:01.180 from driving shipments

00:14:02.760 down to the United States

00:14:03.680 if they wouldn't get

00:14:04.720 the COVID-19 vaccine

00:14:06.480 and they wouldn't take

00:14:07.200 constant PCR tests,

00:14:09.580 which is ridiculous.

00:14:10.940 There was nobody

00:14:11.740 who was more isolated

00:14:12.720 in their jobs

00:14:13.340 than truckers

00:14:13.940 other than maybe

00:14:14.700 lighthouse keepers

00:14:16.480 and they were basically

00:14:18.300 going to be blocked

00:14:19.000 from being able

00:14:19.520 to do their job

00:14:20.220 so they protested.

00:14:21.340 Seems pretty logical

00:14:23.320 that they would protest

00:14:24.120 and then Pollywood

00:14:24.980 support them.

00:14:25.900 And even in here,

00:14:26.800 they say he promised

00:14:27.860 to slash taxes.

00:14:29.120 Good.

00:14:29.900 Shrink the government.

00:14:30.740 Good.

00:14:31.580 End liberal climate

00:14:32.360 change policies.

00:14:33.140 Well, the liberals

00:14:33.620 already did that

00:14:34.260 themselves.

00:14:35.540 And end wokeism.

00:14:36.660 Good.

00:14:37.780 Good.

00:14:38.040 Good.

00:14:39.320 What's the problem here?

00:14:40.640 They're going to end

00:14:41.680 progressive social messaging

00:14:43.920 in the government

00:14:44.720 that we shouldn't be

00:14:45.480 spending money on

00:14:46.240 and wasting our time with.

00:14:47.660 We don't need

00:14:48.200 conservative messaging.

00:14:49.220 We just don't need

00:14:50.000 any messaging.

00:14:50.960 The government should

00:14:51.500 just be running programs,

00:14:53.280 you know,

00:14:53.500 building public infrastructure,

00:14:55.220 doing stuff like that,

00:14:56.620 you know,

00:14:57.380 managing the military.

00:14:58.460 That is all the government

00:14:59.480 is supposed to do.

00:15:00.980 And getting rid of woke,

00:15:02.380 they're acting like

00:15:02.940 this is an offense,

00:15:03.860 like this is offensive

00:15:04.640 that the government

00:15:05.580 is not going to have

00:15:06.440 its own sort of like

00:15:07.700 ideology when it comes

00:15:09.060 to social issues.

00:15:10.240 There is some legislation

00:15:11.980 that is needed

00:15:12.720 around social issues

00:15:13.580 but the whole point

00:15:14.540 of ending wokeism

00:15:15.440 in government

00:15:15.920 is ending political

00:15:17.720 signaling in government,

00:15:19.700 in the bureaucracy,

00:15:21.080 in institutions,

00:15:22.340 you know,

00:15:22.660 in the education department,

00:15:24.840 stuff like that.

00:15:25.860 Purely logical.

00:15:27.080 And if Trump and Polyev 0.94

00:15:28.200 agree on that,

00:15:29.420 who cares?

00:15:30.860 It's like if Trump said

00:15:32.080 the best way to put out

00:15:33.120 a fire is to pour water

00:15:34.540 on it and Polyev

00:15:35.680 agreed with him,

00:15:36.500 that's apparently bad

00:15:37.560 and effectively,

00:15:38.560 we should actually agree

00:15:39.620 with Carney

00:15:40.900 that actually putting

00:15:41.980 battery acid on the fire

00:15:43.320 is a better idea

00:15:44.140 simply because

00:15:45.500 it wasn't what Trump said.

00:15:47.220 But this guy,

00:15:47.900 GM Forbes,

00:15:48.900 posted this

00:15:49.520 in response to that post

00:15:50.920 by the liberals

00:15:51.640 showing Donald Trump

00:15:53.100 at his photo op

00:15:54.940 at the McDonald's,

00:15:56.220 putting some fries

00:15:57.080 into a paper holder

00:16:00.700 and you have over here

00:16:02.400 Mark Carney

00:16:02.960 also putting some fries

00:16:04.540 onto somebody's order

00:16:06.340 at some other campaign

00:16:07.720 stop he was doing.

00:16:09.460 This is a silly comparison

00:16:10.980 comparison and it's meant

00:16:11.940 to be a silly comparison.

00:16:14.080 And so GM Forbes said

00:16:15.220 you were saying

00:16:15.960 in terms of the comparisons

00:16:17.680 between Donald Trump

00:16:18.880 and pure Polyev

00:16:19.600 and he's right.

00:16:21.200 Is this petty and shallow?

00:16:22.760 Is this a petty and shallow

00:16:23.700 comparison to make?

00:16:25.140 Yes.

00:16:25.940 But this is as shallow

00:16:27.280 as the comparisons

00:16:28.300 they've been making

00:16:29.440 to Polyev and Trump.

00:16:31.240 If Polyev even took

00:16:33.060 a photo in a McDonald's,

00:16:34.960 he would get compared

00:16:35.740 to Trump for a week

00:16:36.760 by the liberal campaign

00:16:37.900 and saying look

00:16:38.780 he's taking more pages

00:16:40.020 out of Donald Trump's playbook

00:16:41.260 but Carney can do

00:16:42.480 the same thing as Trump

00:16:43.320 and it's totally okay.

00:16:44.540 And guess what?

00:16:45.060 It is totally okay.

00:16:46.400 It's normal campaigning.

00:16:48.980 If Polyev even took

00:16:50.900 a photo near

00:16:51.920 a fast food restaurant

00:16:53.200 he'd probably get roasted

00:16:54.220 you know compared to Trump

00:16:55.720 compared to Putin

00:16:56.720 and then blamed

00:16:57.360 for the existence

00:16:58.100 of cloudy days

00:16:59.140 on planet Earth.

00:17:00.380 It's wild

00:17:01.400 just how shallow

00:17:03.060 the attacks

00:17:04.040 on the conservatives

00:17:05.280 have been.

00:17:05.720 Oh my goodness.

00:17:08.440 Here's a good video

00:17:10.160 from a liberal

00:17:11.180 pusher on social media

00:17:13.440 saying that Polyev

00:17:14.740 is going to take away

00:17:15.860 abortions. 0.94

00:17:17.140 He is going to legislate

00:17:18.380 against abortions

00:17:19.360 in Canada.

00:17:19.980 And by the way

00:17:20.480 I'm pro-life.

00:17:22.180 I think there should be

00:17:23.040 legislation

00:17:23.520 because we currently

00:17:24.360 have zero legislation.

00:17:26.160 Ban sex-selective abortions.

00:17:27.940 Ban extreme

00:17:28.940 late-term abortions.

00:17:30.060 Stuff that 80% 1.00

00:17:31.000 of the population

00:17:31.640 is on board with

00:17:32.440 if they knew

00:17:33.180 was actually legal

00:17:34.700 in Canada currently.

00:17:36.440 But even though

00:17:37.880 Polyev has explicitly

00:17:39.280 said he's not going

00:17:39.980 to touch the issue

00:17:40.740 you still have

00:17:42.360 liberal influencers

00:17:43.240 like this who are saying

00:17:44.080 no he's going to

00:17:45.680 do it anyways

00:17:46.420 because

00:17:47.280 I can guarantee you

00:17:48.620 there will be no

00:17:49.440 laws restricting

00:17:51.120 abortion pass.

00:17:54.300 I don't believe you

00:17:55.740 and let me tell you why.

00:17:58.580 Although the Supreme Court

00:18:00.060 has struck down

00:18:01.040 many attempts

00:18:02.620 a legislation

00:18:03.560 to criminalize.

00:18:05.960 They actually haven't.

00:18:07.100 They've just not done that.

00:18:09.540 There really hasn't been

00:18:10.440 any legislation passed.

00:18:11.560 She just fundamentally

00:18:12.560 doesn't understand

00:18:13.200 the issue.

00:18:15.340 Pierre Polyev

00:18:16.180 time and time again

00:18:17.180 has voted

00:18:18.100 for private bills

00:18:20.200 in the House of Commons

00:18:21.280 that would

00:18:22.400 restrict access

00:18:24.120 to

00:18:24.660 or

00:18:26.640 I don't know

00:18:27.100 why she won't say

00:18:27.720 the word

00:18:28.160 even though

00:18:28.580 she already played

00:18:29.020 a clip

00:18:29.360 with the word

00:18:29.820 in it.

00:18:30.720 Yeah Polyev 0.99

00:18:31.380 actually had a very

00:18:32.500 solidly pro-life

00:18:33.460 voting record

00:18:34.120 before he became

00:18:35.000 leader

00:18:35.380 and guess what

00:18:36.160 he's voting for?

00:18:37.060 Stuff like

00:18:37.580 ending sex

00:18:38.380 selective abortion.

00:18:39.940 Things like

00:18:40.440 having increased

00:18:41.480 sentencing

00:18:42.180 for people

00:18:43.140 who kill

00:18:44.280 or assault

00:18:44.980 pregnant women 0.99

00:18:45.780 and cause them

00:18:46.660 like obviously

00:18:47.380 if the woman 0.98

00:18:49.020 dies

00:18:49.480 the baby

00:18:49.840 would die

00:18:50.180 too

00:18:50.420 or causing

00:18:51.260 a miscarriage

00:18:51.880 by assaulting her.

00:18:52.960 Very sensible

00:18:53.640 policies

00:18:54.160 that I think

00:18:54.760 people would be

00:18:55.640 shocked

00:18:56.100 that the liberals

00:18:57.040 and the NDP

00:18:57.600 and the Greens

00:18:58.180 and the bloc

00:18:58.760 all voted

00:18:59.260 against that.

00:19:00.340 I've said this

00:19:00.900 before

00:19:01.140 that's not even

00:19:02.080 like oh

00:19:02.600 I'm pro-life

00:19:03.480 you're pro-trice 0.99

00:19:04.060 that's just like

00:19:04.680 goblin behavior.

00:19:06.300 Melissa Lantzman

00:19:07.360 Michelle Rempel

00:19:08.640 a bunch of

00:19:09.680 well-known

00:19:10.480 red Tories

00:19:11.280 in the party

00:19:12.220 voted

00:19:13.140 on social issues

00:19:14.660 they tend to be

00:19:15.460 more progressive

00:19:16.180 they voted in favor

00:19:17.560 of that stuff

00:19:18.300 for increased

00:19:18.900 sentencing

00:19:19.360 because it's such

00:19:20.380 an obvious thing

00:19:21.280 to do

00:19:21.580 but the liberals

00:19:22.280 are so pro-abortion 0.99

00:19:24.780 they're not

00:19:25.880 just in favor

00:19:27.120 of access

00:19:27.580 they are pro-abortion

00:19:29.220 they couldn't even

00:19:30.460 vote to recognize

00:19:31.780 that there is

00:19:32.740 actual loss

00:19:33.880 in somebody

00:19:35.000 being assaulted

00:19:35.880 and miscarrying

00:19:36.700 when they did not

00:19:37.480 want to

00:19:38.080 but this person

00:19:40.160 is going to

00:19:40.700 project

00:19:41.140 this as

00:19:41.760 they're going

00:19:42.480 to you know

00:19:42.840 handmaid's tale

00:19:43.520 it's going to be

00:19:44.160 the handmaid's tale

00:19:44.860 of polyableness

00:19:45.500 or make it difficult

00:19:47.860 for women

00:19:48.500 to have access

00:19:49.940 to it

00:19:50.600 I have a huge

00:19:51.960 issue with that

00:19:53.140 considering that

00:19:54.260 if this government

00:19:54.960 is elected

00:19:55.740 although they can't

00:19:57.580 change the legislation

00:19:58.700 what they can do

00:19:59.740 is control

00:20:00.440 the funding

00:20:01.340 making it difficult

00:20:02.780 how does that

00:20:03.840 make it difficult

00:20:04.480 the fund

00:20:05.300 that the government

00:20:06.060 a taxpayer

00:20:06.760 doesn't have to pay

00:20:07.580 for it

00:20:08.000 that makes it

00:20:09.080 difficult

00:20:09.520 apparently

00:20:10.420 the government

00:20:11.720 is currently

00:20:12.320 making it difficult

00:20:13.200 for me to have

00:20:14.180 a car

00:20:14.500 because they're

00:20:14.840 not paying

00:20:15.280 for my car

00:20:15.900 the government

00:20:16.800 is making it

00:20:17.620 difficult

00:20:18.000 for me to

00:20:19.080 own a house

00:20:19.520 because they're

00:20:20.020 not paying

00:20:20.500 for my house

00:20:21.180 that is not

00:20:22.020 how things work

00:20:22.920 in reality

00:20:23.680 for women to have 0.90

00:20:24.820 access to these

00:20:25.960 services

00:20:26.460 and that is a

00:20:28.120 true threat

00:20:28.680 to women's

00:20:29.480 health rights

00:20:30.220 which is why

00:20:30.940 I will never

00:20:31.500 be voting for you

00:20:32.360 sir

00:20:32.660 it's not a right

00:20:34.560 to have people

00:20:35.320 pay for things

00:20:36.600 for you

00:20:37.140 that is

00:20:38.220 delusional

00:20:39.220 left-wing thinking

00:20:40.080 that rights

00:20:41.320 are actually

00:20:41.880 things the government

00:20:42.560 must provide you

00:20:43.480 you have a right

00:20:44.300 to housing

00:20:44.740 you have a right

00:20:46.520 to abortion care

00:20:47.400 you have a right

00:20:49.180 to like other

00:20:50.380 things

00:20:50.780 you know

00:20:51.140 you have a right

00:20:52.260 to all these

00:20:52.800 other things

00:20:53.180 that you're supposed

00:20:53.800 to go get

00:20:54.400 for yourself

00:20:54.900 as a responsible

00:20:55.740 adult

00:20:56.240 obviously things

00:20:57.620 like housing

00:20:58.240 could be a right

00:20:58.920 for people

00:20:59.400 who genuinely

00:21:00.300 cannot provide

00:21:01.040 it for themselves

00:21:01.500 that's fine

00:21:02.220 but whenever

00:21:03.380 you start

00:21:03.860 to just

00:21:04.220 make things

00:21:05.000 rights

00:21:05.440 that any

00:21:06.220 reasonable

00:21:06.780 person

00:21:07.380 any functional

00:21:08.260 person

00:21:08.640 should be able

00:21:08.980 to go get

00:21:09.420 for themselves

00:21:10.120 it ends up

00:21:11.140 destroying society

00:21:12.080 because now

00:21:12.660 everyone is a

00:21:13.640 taker

00:21:13.980 and not actually

00:21:14.920 somebody who

00:21:15.600 makes and provides

00:21:16.740 services and resources

00:21:18.120 but that should

00:21:19.860 probably be obvious

00:21:20.640 for all of you

00:21:21.180 in the audience

00:21:21.760 here's another guy

00:21:23.560 going after

00:21:24.480 the conservatives

00:21:25.640 and he is talking

00:21:26.900 about how

00:21:27.780 you know

00:21:28.220 we gotta say no

00:21:28.980 to fascism

00:21:29.700 in Canada

00:21:30.160 apparently

00:21:30.660 guys

00:21:31.060 we gotta go

00:21:31.420 we gotta say

00:21:31.980 no to fascism

00:21:32.900 I believe

00:21:33.580 this is a liberal

00:21:34.200 influencer

00:21:34.720 might be

00:21:35.100 NDP

00:21:35.420 who knows

00:21:35.960 I believe

00:21:36.900 so

00:21:37.120 like

00:21:37.380 what is

00:21:38.600 how would

00:21:39.340 the person

00:21:39.580 set this clip

00:21:40.180 up

00:21:40.460 they say

00:21:41.000 everything

00:21:42.000 Dan

00:21:42.320 Megan

00:21:43.280 says

00:21:43.700 say no

00:21:44.700 to fascism

00:21:45.300 and uncertainty

00:21:46.960 vote

00:21:47.480 Mark Carney

00:21:48.140 oh my goodness

00:21:49.800 quick reminder

00:21:51.320 Canada

00:21:51.720 that April 28th

00:21:52.620 is our national

00:21:53.140 election

00:21:53.560 it's also my

00:21:54.260 birthday

00:21:54.600 I will be

00:21:55.420 voting for

00:21:55.860 sovereignty

00:21:56.340 cultural sovereignty

00:21:57.300 political sovereignty

00:21:58.300 for the arts

00:21:59.260 for culture

00:21:59.860 for CBC

00:22:00.460 for climate

00:22:01.260 it's sovereignty

00:22:03.420 by taking

00:22:04.260 taxpayer money

00:22:05.120 and giving it

00:22:06.320 to the deeply

00:22:07.600 uncreative

00:22:08.540 and untalented

00:22:09.280 people who work

00:22:10.160 at the CBC

00:22:10.840 because we need

00:22:12.380 more CBC

00:22:13.080 gem shows

00:22:13.920 apparently

00:22:14.340 have you guys

00:22:15.140 ever sat

00:22:15.740 through a CBC

00:22:16.680 gem show

00:22:17.500 it's akin

00:22:18.560 to torture

00:22:19.560 it is actually

00:22:20.960 the least funny

00:22:21.680 thing you've seen

00:22:22.200 in your life

00:22:22.600 if you try and

00:22:23.260 watch a gem

00:22:24.620 comedy

00:22:25.140 in fact

00:22:25.800 probably the

00:22:26.320 dramas are

00:22:26.780 funnier

00:22:27.180 because of

00:22:27.600 the terrible

00:22:28.000 acting

00:22:28.500 no

00:22:29.480 I'm standing

00:22:30.980 up for

00:22:31.320 the sovereignty

00:22:32.260 of our arts

00:22:32.840 and culture

00:22:33.340 by having it

00:22:34.380 controlled by

00:22:34.940 the government

00:22:35.340 good job sir

00:22:36.960 for integrity

00:22:38.120 for accountability

00:22:39.700 for thoughtfulness

00:22:40.660 for kindness

00:22:41.240 for empathy

00:22:41.900 for social

00:22:42.540 infrastructure

00:22:43.140 oh my goodness

00:22:44.360 guys we have

00:22:44.940 to vote

00:22:45.240 Carney

00:22:45.660 we're going

00:22:46.080 to have

00:22:46.660 empathy

00:22:47.740 leave the

00:22:49.060 country

00:22:49.440 what is this

00:22:50.540 we're going

00:22:51.180 to have

00:22:51.400 empathy

00:22:51.880 leave

00:22:52.320 I got to

00:22:53.600 get back

00:22:54.020 to that

00:22:54.440 also I like

00:22:55.440 to be down

00:22:55.820 here a little

00:22:56.180 bit more

00:22:56.440 on screen

00:22:56.660 I have to

00:22:57.860 hear that

00:22:58.140 again

00:22:58.460 for accountability

00:22:59.640 for thoughtfulness

00:23:00.620 for kindness

00:23:01.220 guys you can't

00:23:02.740 be thoughtful

00:23:03.280 if Pierre Pali

00:23:03.920 becomes the

00:23:04.520 prime minister

00:23:05.060 thoughtfulness

00:23:06.040 will be banned

00:23:06.700 empathy

00:23:07.520 will be banned

00:23:08.100 kindness

00:23:08.660 will be banned

00:23:09.600 empathy

00:23:10.100 for social

00:23:10.760 infrastructure

00:23:11.400 voting

00:23:12.100 against

00:23:12.900 fascism

00:23:13.580 what is social

00:23:14.320 infrastructure

00:23:14.860 oh he's

00:23:15.420 voting against

00:23:16.180 fascism

00:23:16.900 guys

00:23:17.280 what a hero

00:23:18.260 against this

00:23:19.480 creeping

00:23:20.160 alpha

00:23:20.700 incel

00:23:21.400 BS

00:23:22.360 fake

00:23:22.960 manosphere

00:23:23.700 garbage

00:23:24.400 paper

00:23:25.260 thin

00:23:25.720 skinned

00:23:27.040 volatility

00:23:27.640 driven

00:23:28.460 meme stock

00:23:29.240 politicians

00:23:29.900 on the

00:23:30.300 right

00:23:30.540 who are

00:23:31.220 did this

00:23:32.040 guy swallow

00:23:32.700 a thesaurus

00:23:33.400 or something

00:23:33.860 before he

00:23:34.380 made this

00:23:34.760 video

00:23:35.020 I don't

00:23:35.620 know what

00:23:36.040 he's even

00:23:36.720 getting at

00:23:37.760 here

00:23:38.000 Polyev in 0.97

00:23:39.160 the manosphere

00:23:39.940 did he start

00:23:41.620 campaigning with

00:23:42.200 Andrew Tate

00:23:42.760 and I didn't

00:23:43.140 notice

00:23:43.520 only relevant

00:23:44.920 if the water

00:23:45.540 is choppy

00:23:46.220 be done

00:23:47.140 with it

00:23:47.500 holy shit

00:23:48.280 can we move

00:23:49.000 on from

00:23:49.600 this garbage

00:23:50.200 what is

00:23:50.880 the bottom

00:23:51.660 of this

00:23:52.080 barrel

00:23:52.520 and can

00:23:53.220 we lift

00:23:54.380 to a

00:23:54.860 version

00:23:55.360 of humanity

00:23:56.020 that is

00:23:56.480 some sort

00:23:57.300 of shared

00:23:57.980 truth

00:23:58.520 about

00:23:58.860 what is

00:24:00.040 real

00:24:00.500 do you

00:24:01.260 not want

00:24:01.580 what's

00:24:01.800 happening

00:24:02.060 in the

00:24:02.340 states

00:24:02.560 happening

00:24:02.900 in Canada

00:24:03.440 constant

00:24:04.180 threat

00:24:04.580 to

00:24:04.780 everything

00:24:05.300 markets

00:24:06.280 tumbling

00:24:06.800 constant

00:24:07.840 chaos

00:24:08.340 division

00:24:08.940 did they

00:24:09.720 not care

00:24:10.180 about the

00:24:10.460 economy

00:24:10.800 failing

00:24:11.300 over the

00:24:11.820 past

00:24:12.080 10 years

00:24:12.580 did they

00:24:13.300 not care

00:24:13.760 about the

00:24:14.060 GDP

00:24:14.380 per capita

00:24:15.140 going

00:24:15.860 down

00:24:16.060 in the

00:24:16.220 past

00:24:16.460 five

00:24:16.700 years

00:24:16.880 this is

00:24:17.620 what I

00:24:17.840 consider

00:24:18.080 an

00:24:18.300 aesthetic

00:24:18.740 voter

00:24:19.140 this guy

00:24:20.200 wants to

00:24:20.740 vote

00:24:21.000 because he

00:24:21.740 wants to

00:24:22.200 aesthetically

00:24:22.820 be against

00:24:23.280 fascism

00:24:23.820 he wants

00:24:24.500 to be

00:24:24.800 aesthetically

00:24:25.600 a thoughtful

00:24:26.220 kind

00:24:26.640 empathetic

00:24:27.120 person

00:24:27.560 and

00:24:28.120 Apolly

00:24:28.420 have

00:24:28.560 wins

00:24:29.000 we're

00:24:29.640 just

00:24:29.780 not a

00:24:30.100 kind

00:24:30.600 thoughtful

00:24:31.140 empathetic

00:24:31.640 country

00:24:31.960 because

00:24:32.220 apparently

00:24:32.720 your guys

00:24:33.720 are the

00:24:33.960 good

00:24:34.140 ones

00:24:34.480 and the

00:24:35.140 other

00:24:35.280 guys

00:24:35.500 are the

00:24:35.720 bad

00:24:36.120 ones

00:24:36.480 I

00:24:37.280 don't

00:24:37.680 even

00:24:37.940 exact

00:24:38.300 I'm

00:24:38.560 not like

00:24:39.220 oh

00:24:39.560 the liberals

00:24:40.000 are bad

00:24:40.640 people

00:24:41.060 they just

00:24:41.760 have

00:24:42.060 like

00:24:42.760 plans

00:24:43.200 that are

00:24:43.420 not

00:24:43.600 good

00:24:43.960 it's

00:24:44.560 that

00:24:44.840 they're

00:24:45.120 doubling

00:24:45.400 down

00:24:45.760 on

00:24:45.940 things

00:24:46.140 that I

00:24:46.360 think

00:24:49.140 mass

00:24:53.300 immigration

00:24:53.780 has not

00:24:54.160 been good

00:24:54.480 for the

00:24:54.720 economy

00:24:55.120 or social

00:24:55.840 cohesion

00:24:56.360 you can't

00:24:56.780 have

00:24:57.020 3%

00:24:57.960 of your

00:24:58.220 population

00:24:58.800 entering

00:24:59.140 the country

00:24:59.580 every year

00:25:00.060 with not

00:25:00.660 enough

00:25:00.900 housing

00:25:01.220 for everybody

00:25:01.860 and think

00:25:02.480 this is

00:25:02.840 not going

00:25:03.160 to cause

00:25:03.580 more than

00:25:04.200 one type

00:25:04.780 of problem

00:25:05.400 but no

00:25:06.460 we need

00:25:08.180 to stand

00:25:08.460 up for

00:25:08.700 fascism

00:25:09.800 guys

00:25:10.100 because

00:25:10.360 Pierre

00:25:10.660 Polyev

00:25:11.100 a man

00:25:11.860 who wants

00:25:12.180 to shrink

00:25:12.660 government

00:25:13.040 and give

00:25:13.380 you back

00:25:13.720 some of

00:25:13.980 your own

00:25:14.240 money

00:25:14.500 he is

00:25:15.200 representing

00:25:15.820 fascism

00:25:16.420 apparently

00:25:16.840 because

00:25:17.100 Benito

00:25:17.500 Mussolini

00:25:18.060 was famous

00:25:19.000 for reducing

00:25:20.200 the size

00:25:20.640 of government

00:25:21.140 fear-mongering

00:25:22.380 we can make

00:25:23.520 a choice

00:25:24.000 in Canada

00:25:24.980 all you have

00:25:25.660 is dangerous

00:25:26.300 he's maple

00:25:27.460 MAGA

00:25:27.880 he will

00:25:28.680 get the

00:25:29.220 copper

00:25:29.560 wiring

00:25:30.020 out of

00:25:30.280 the walls

00:25:30.720 of this

00:25:31.060 country

00:25:31.420 and sell

00:25:32.060 it

00:25:32.220 Canada

00:25:32.960 is at

00:25:33.340 a

00:25:33.480 total

00:25:34.100 crossroads

00:25:38.860 liberal

00:25:39.160 party

00:25:39.500 is not

00:25:39.820 perfect

00:25:40.280 Kanye

00:25:40.900 is not

00:25:41.220 perfect

00:25:41.520 but he

00:25:41.860 is an

00:25:42.120 adult

00:25:42.700 Polyev's

00:25:44.640 not an

00:25:45.020 adult

00:25:45.360 you can't

00:25:45.880 vote for

00:25:46.360 him

00:25:46.480 the man

00:25:47.000 he's not

00:25:47.840 even an

00:25:48.240 adult

00:25:48.680 at the

00:25:49.020 table

00:25:49.420 he doesn't

00:25:50.300 thrive on

00:25:50.760 chaos

00:25:51.100 he can

00:25:51.620 consider

00:25:52.380 an answer

00:25:52.900 and thoughtfully

00:25:53.560 explain it

00:25:54.260 like an

00:25:55.040 adult

00:25:55.560 luckily there

00:25:56.400 yeah

00:25:57.140 Polyev the

00:25:58.080 man who

00:25:58.680 does

00:25:59.040 long-form

00:25:59.640 interviews

00:26:00.040 cannot put

00:26:00.640 a coherent

00:26:01.200 thought together

00:26:02.000 but Carney

00:26:02.800 the man

00:26:03.260 who has

00:26:03.580 not done

00:26:04.000 a long-form

00:26:05.240 interview

00:26:05.560 this entire

00:26:06.100 election

00:26:06.460 he's

00:26:07.160 he's your

00:26:07.620 ticket

00:26:07.900 the man

00:26:08.360 who we

00:26:09.220 literally

00:26:09.580 have an

00:26:10.080 um and

00:26:10.360 ah

00:26:10.560 counter for

00:26:11.280 in some

00:26:11.700 of the

00:26:11.940 videos

00:26:12.360 because he

00:26:13.180 is so

00:26:13.540 bad at

00:26:13.840 articulating

00:26:14.400 himself

00:26:14.740 in press

00:26:15.200 conferences

00:26:15.700 that guy

00:26:16.700 can

00:26:17.040 that guy

00:26:17.960 if you're

00:26:18.260 looking for

00:26:18.620 someone to

00:26:19.000 lay down

00:26:19.360 a thought

00:26:19.900 like a

00:26:20.700 carpenter

00:26:21.400 putting like

00:26:22.420 putting laying

00:26:23.400 down boards

00:26:24.560 you want

00:26:25.500 Mark Carney

00:26:26.100 are tools you

00:26:27.400 can use to

00:26:27.840 figure out who

00:26:28.380 in your writing

00:26:28.920 has the best

00:26:29.520 chance of beating

00:26:30.140 your local

00:26:30.580 conservative so

00:26:31.260 we're not

00:26:31.620 splitting the

00:26:32.140 vote we can

00:26:32.980 vote strategically

00:26:33.920 338 Canada

00:26:35.340 or vote well

00:26:36.280 there's a few

00:26:36.740 other ones check

00:26:37.460 it out do some

00:26:38.480 research figure out

00:26:39.260 who in your

00:26:39.820 writing between

00:26:40.320 the greens the

00:26:41.000 NDP or the

00:26:42.520 liberal of course

00:26:43.340 has the best

00:26:44.300 chance

00:26:44.620 as soon as

00:26:45.940 you are talking

00:26:46.500 about strategic

00:26:47.140 voting like

00:26:47.740 this I don't

00:26:48.980 respect you

00:26:49.560 you don't have

00:26:50.780 any opinion

00:26:51.340 worth respecting

00:26:52.100 because you

00:26:52.880 are saying I

00:26:53.380 don't even care

00:26:54.040 who you vote

00:26:54.540 for I don't

00:26:55.060 care what

00:26:55.340 ideology it

00:26:56.040 is what their

00:26:56.400 platform is what

00:26:57.160 they say on

00:26:57.700 different issues

00:26:58.240 it's all it's

00:26:59.340 all equal

00:27:00.060 it's because he's

00:27:01.660 created a fake

00:27:02.800 political system

00:27:03.840 in his head

00:27:04.340 where there is

00:27:05.100 the good and

00:27:05.940 there is the

00:27:06.360 bad even though

00:27:07.500 the people on

00:27:08.200 the side of the

00:27:08.760 good have wildly

00:27:09.720 contrasting views

00:27:10.780 on certain

00:27:11.240 issues like

00:27:12.120 the greens and

00:27:12.800 the NDP just

00:27:13.760 being the wildly

00:27:14.540 pro-Hamas party

00:27:15.660 the liberals being

00:27:16.800 the ones who

00:27:17.260 pat them on the

00:27:17.860 head by the way

00:27:18.800 apparently that's

00:27:19.780 part of kindness

00:27:20.980 empathy and

00:27:22.260 thoughtfulness is

00:27:23.320 tut-tutting the

00:27:25.000 Hamas basically 0.98

00:27:26.880 saying guys stop

00:27:28.460 killing Jewish 1.00

00:27:29.340 people thanks but

00:27:31.340 we're still going

00:27:31.860 to fund UNRWA and

00:27:32.900 all these other

00:27:33.380 organizations that

00:27:34.240 you guys are

00:27:34.760 basically just using

00:27:36.120 as go-betweens to

00:27:37.400 get resources for

00:27:38.920 your terrorist

00:27:39.720 activities

00:27:40.380 and nuts

00:27:42.420 nuts that

00:27:43.220 people can

00:27:44.460 actually think

00:27:44.960 this way

00:27:45.440 the pro-terror

00:27:49.800 parties

00:27:50.300 the parties

00:27:51.160 who refuse

00:27:52.240 to call out

00:27:52.800 terrorism

00:27:53.300 those ones

00:27:54.820 are the ones

00:27:55.260 who basically

00:27:55.840 condemn Israel 0.89

00:27:56.780 every single

00:27:57.320 time something

00:27:57.820 happens in the

00:27:58.540 Middle East

00:27:59.000 and never have

00:28:00.200 a terse word

00:28:01.860 for Hamas

00:28:02.460 unless they

00:28:02.920 just murdered

00:28:04.000 a bunch of

00:28:04.440 people

00:28:04.760 those are the

00:28:05.680 people representing

00:28:06.380 thoughtfulness and

00:28:07.100 kindness

00:28:07.520 anyways okay

00:28:09.560 here's another

00:28:10.260 post by the

00:28:11.160 Liberal Party

00:28:11.720 of Canada

00:28:12.200 or actually it's

00:28:12.900 Carney Media but

00:28:13.680 it's from the

00:28:14.060 Liberal Party

00:28:14.580 and they say

00:28:15.940 Pierre Polyev says

00:28:17.260 he'll end woke

00:28:18.240 culture in the

00:28:18.780 military we've seen

00:28:20.040 that movie before

00:28:21.000 and then you have a

00:28:22.100 headline here from

00:28:22.940 AFP says Trump

00:28:24.180 fires first woman to 0.97

00:28:25.340 lead a US military

00:28:26.400 service

00:28:26.920 is that necessarily

00:28:29.800 a bad thing

00:28:30.440 did he fire her for

00:28:31.860 being a woman or

00:28:32.660 was she fired for

00:28:33.520 not being good at

00:28:34.120 her job it's like 0.93

00:28:35.220 if you say they

00:28:36.340 fired a man for

00:28:37.360 doing something and

00:28:38.160 I'm supposed to be

00:28:38.820 mad about it because

00:28:39.560 oh my goodness I

00:28:40.200 can't believe they

00:28:40.640 fired a man

00:28:41.300 what happened and

00:28:43.300 then Toronto Sun

00:28:43.900 here says Polyev

00:28:44.840 promises to end

00:28:45.700 woke culture in

00:28:46.340 military

00:28:46.720 good

00:28:49.160 good

00:28:50.640 our current

00:28:51.920 military acts

00:28:53.060 more like an HR

00:28:54.000 department

00:28:54.560 and it's an HR

00:28:56.780 department with a

00:28:57.480 few more firearms

00:28:58.260 that is literally

00:28:59.260 what the military

00:28:59.820 is at this point

00:29:00.560 we have no ability

00:29:01.660 to deploy troops

00:29:02.560 everywhere

00:29:03.080 anywhere I've heard

00:29:04.160 that the military

00:29:05.020 readiness for

00:29:05.840 reserves is about

00:29:06.800 maybe 30%

00:29:07.760 most of them could

00:29:08.760 not actually be

00:29:09.300 deployed in a war

00:29:10.320 zone there's a

00:29:11.360 reason why and I

00:29:12.360 feel bad for them

00:29:13.220 because it's not

00:29:13.720 their fault there's

00:29:14.600 a reason why there

00:29:15.820 was a parade in

00:29:16.760 Edmonton on Canada

00:29:17.960 day where you saw

00:29:18.880 troops who couldn't

00:29:19.860 even march in line

00:29:20.740 properly and it's

00:29:21.820 not again it's not

00:29:22.520 their fault it's the

00:29:23.800 leadership of the

00:29:24.360 military it's the

00:29:25.220 priorities and it's

00:29:26.080 the priorities

00:29:26.600 specifically of the

00:29:28.120 political side of the

00:29:29.720 military which is the

00:29:30.740 liberal government

00:29:31.460 because they don't

00:29:32.340 care about readiness

00:29:33.540 they don't care about

00:29:34.240 having offensive power

00:29:35.580 we don't have any

00:29:36.480 offensive power we

00:29:38.060 couldn't even get our

00:29:38.680 planes off the ground

00:29:39.500 these days

00:29:40.020 here is Mark Carney

00:29:43.600 once again going

00:29:44.520 after Polyev for

00:29:46.260 oh actually this is

00:29:47.060 just the same

00:29:47.600 it's actually a

00:29:48.920 different event

00:29:49.540 now I'm confused

00:29:51.920 so he's just repeating

00:29:52.760 the same line about

00:29:53.720 Trump never changing

00:29:55.280 and that we need

00:29:55.900 somebody who doesn't

00:29:57.120 copy Donald Trump

00:29:58.260 we can't I don't

00:30:00.160 think change

00:30:00.940 President Trump

00:30:02.100 78 years in I don't

00:30:04.480 think we're going to

00:30:04.920 change him so we

00:30:06.080 need a leader we need

00:30:07.480 a leader who can

00:30:08.200 stand up to him

00:30:09.000 yeah

00:30:10.320 what does that mean

00:30:12.920 bro what do you

00:30:14.780 think Polyev is just

00:30:15.560 going to be like just

00:30:16.120 have Saskatchewan just

00:30:17.480 do it just take

00:30:18.160 Saskatchewan what's

00:30:19.900 Mark he's going to

00:30:20.780 stand up and he's

00:30:21.640 going to stand up

00:30:22.300 strong

00:30:22.880 what does any of

00:30:25.660 this even mean

00:30:26.760 and that's not

00:30:30.780 that leader isn't

00:30:39.660 that leader isn't

00:30:41.300 Pierre Polyev

00:30:42.220 no

00:30:44.460 no

00:30:45.280 he draws his

00:30:46.680 inspiration

00:30:47.280 his inspiration from

00:30:48.660 Trump he mimics

00:30:49.460 Trump

00:30:49.720 when has Polyev ever

00:30:51.580 cited Trump

00:30:52.380 when has he ever

00:30:53.480 cited him as a

00:30:54.500 positive it's never

00:30:56.020 happened but for the

00:30:57.460 liberals to win this

00:30:58.260 election they need you

00:30:59.540 to believe that it's

00:31:00.380 happened

00:31:00.720 anyways so that should

00:31:03.560 be it for this video

00:31:04.480 guys I will be back

00:31:05.660 later today maybe with

00:31:06.820 an update on how the

00:31:08.140 electoral map is

00:31:09.020 looking and what the

00:31:09.960 path to victory looked

00:31:11.020 like for the

00:31:11.940 conservatives and for

00:31:13.000 the liberal party it is

00:31:14.480 an extremely tight

00:31:15.340 election I could even

00:31:16.800 see this election ending

00:31:18.400 with the liberals and

00:31:19.500 conservatives only being

00:31:20.780 separated by a few

00:31:21.940 seats and in which we

00:31:23.780 will be basically

00:31:24.440 thrown into utter

00:31:25.400 chaos when it comes to

00:31:26.720 the makeup of

00:31:27.860 parliament but anyway

00:31:29.000 so make sure you guys

00:31:29.940 like this video

00:31:30.640 subscribe to the

00:31:31.360 channel if you're not

00:31:32.000 yet a subscriber leave

00:31:33.280 a comment do all that

00:31:34.860 great stuff helps me in

00:31:35.940 the algorithm and I do

00:31:36.880 like to read people's

00:31:37.720 comments over the next

00:31:39.080 few days and you know

00:31:40.760 thanks for all the

00:31:41.360 support guys and I'll

00:31:42.160 see you next time

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 23, 2025

Liberal attacks on Poilievre keep getting DUMBER!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript