The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 23, 2025


Liberal attacks on Poilievre keep getting DUMBER!


Episode Stats

Length

31 minutes

Words per Minute

168.41142

Word Count

5,341

Sentence Count

195

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

In this episode, Wyatt Claypool talks about the Liberals' attacks on the Conservatives, and why they have been so frustrating to watch. He also points out that the Conservatives have a plan to grow the economy, and the Liberals don't have one.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here.
00:00:02.840 One of the very frustrating things about this Canadian federal election, at least for me,
00:00:07.720 has been watching so many people who are planning on voting Liberal
00:00:11.120 buying into the very shallow attacks from the Liberal Party on Pierre Polyev and the Conservatives.
00:00:17.580 Frankly, if someone is planning on voting Liberal,
00:00:20.520 they should be confronted with the fact that the Liberals have been mostly just making
00:00:24.260 shallow, petty personal attacks on Pierre Polyev the entire time,
00:00:27.760 while the Conservatives have mostly been going after Mark Carney and the Liberals
00:00:31.880 for their record in government, as well as what they plan to do with a fourth term.
00:00:37.480 I think those two things contrast very well for the Conservatives.
00:00:41.420 They are focused on policy and results.
00:00:43.940 The Liberals are focused on vague connections to Donald Trump
00:00:47.180 and going after the Conservatives for things that they are obviously not going to do.
00:00:52.100 Every single federal election since Trudeau has been around and now with Mark Carney,
00:00:56.100 the Liberals have pretended that the Conservatives are planning on cutting your CPP,
00:01:01.220 getting rid of public health care, and they're also going to push your mother down the stairs
00:01:05.520 just for good measure.
00:01:07.220 It's maddening that this actually does work on a certain type of voter
00:01:10.920 who sits around watching way too much legacy media,
00:01:14.300 where the talking heads repeat this over and over again, as if it's even close to reality.
00:01:19.600 Have you ever seen a party in Canadian history run against health care,
00:01:25.700 running against spending more on health care?
00:01:27.940 There has never been a party in existence in Canada that actually ran on cutting health care spending.
00:01:34.300 They have never ran on cutting CPP or raising the retirement age.
00:01:39.500 It's never happened.
00:01:40.820 Yet there is a large portion of people who will vote Liberal because we got to defend public health care
00:01:45.240 from this imagined demon who's coming to just slash it all and ban people from seeing a doctor.
00:01:52.260 My goodness.
00:01:53.340 But I want to go over some of this stuff with you guys today because it's frustrating for me
00:01:57.480 and it's probably frustrating for you.
00:01:59.140 So I want to work our way through it just so we can kind of digest the ridiculousness of it.
00:02:04.380 And again, if you have any people who are voting Liberal in your life,
00:02:08.620 ask them about the contrast between how the Conservatives critique the Liberals
00:02:13.040 and Liberals critique the Conservatives.
00:02:15.280 Because I think it's very enlightening to look at that for many people
00:02:18.720 and realize that they're voting for the party who is effectively running for class president
00:02:23.200 by saying that they're going to ban homework.
00:02:25.740 My goodness.
00:02:26.820 Anyways, before I get into this, guys, make sure to hit the like button on this video
00:02:30.580 if you've been liking my federal election coverage,
00:02:33.060 subscribe to the channel if you are not yet a subscriber,
00:02:35.900 and leave a comment on the topic of the day,
00:02:38.760 what has been the most frustrating attack on the Conservatives from the Liberals in your opinion.
00:02:44.120 Anyways, here is a video of Mark Carney critiquing the Conservatives' platform,
00:02:48.800 and it seems like it's actually going to be substantive.
00:02:51.480 He's going after the platform.
00:02:52.840 What's in the platform that is so offensive to Mark Carney?
00:02:56.380 And it's very shallow, as we are going to see.
00:02:59.040 The Conservative plan makes it up.
00:03:02.680 It literally makes it up.
00:03:03.900 It says that growth will come from somewhere,
00:03:10.200 even though there's no plan to address the biggest risk to our economy, the U.S.
00:03:14.800 Those two things don't actually match up.
00:03:18.460 That's not a critique.
00:03:20.160 How are they going to get the growth
00:03:22.340 if they don't address the biggest threat to our economy, the United States?
00:03:27.000 One, the Conservative platform does.
00:03:29.180 It talks about its counter-tariff plans and whatnot.
00:03:32.780 But the main thing, the main reason the Conservatives can be confident there will be economic growth
00:03:37.480 is because they are going to cut regulations, taxes,
00:03:40.740 and they are going to fast-track new national resource projects.
00:03:44.220 It would be impossible doing those things to not achieve higher growth.
00:03:48.200 But he's just pretending because they're not addressing Donald Trump,
00:03:51.960 the Conservatives can't achieve growth.
00:03:54.580 That's not...
00:03:55.720 It's hard for me to even state how much that doesn't make sense.
00:03:59.560 Those two things are different topics.
00:04:03.100 You can achieve growth while...
00:04:08.080 Again, it's one of those things where it doesn't even track at all.
00:04:13.060 It's like saying,
00:04:14.080 how are the Conservatives going to achieve growth
00:04:16.260 if they're not going to get to 2% NATO spending by 2030?
00:04:21.740 Different topics?
00:04:22.780 I don't know how those two things come together.
00:04:26.300 Even though their tax cut doesn't arrive for four years.
00:04:29.220 Even though their...
00:04:30.020 It does.
00:04:30.640 It just gets phased in,
00:04:31.800 and it's far larger than the Liberals' tax cut.
00:04:35.800 Costing numbers are far too low.
00:04:39.100 Even though their reductions in spending don't appear.
00:04:45.540 You could make that criticism of any budget.
00:04:52.140 Every party tends to put out an idealist version
00:04:54.560 of how much money they're going to spend on different things
00:04:56.840 and how they're going to find savings.
00:04:59.100 Carney, in his own budget,
00:05:00.480 where he wants to add $130 billion of new spending over four years
00:05:04.200 to what Trudeau was already doing.
00:05:06.180 In fact, this is effectively just Trudeau's 2025 platform
00:05:09.020 that they controlled F'd and just removed the name Justin Trudeau
00:05:12.940 and replaced it with Mark Carnian.
00:05:14.660 In his platform,
00:05:15.880 they're expecting to find $28 billion in savings through efficiencies
00:05:20.680 in order to offset the cost of the new spending.
00:05:24.300 Have you ever seen this government,
00:05:26.240 especially when he was the economic advisor for the past five years,
00:05:30.200 find big efficiencies?
00:05:31.700 They haven't.
00:05:32.880 They just haven't.
00:05:34.300 His numbers are far more fantastical than the Conservatives,
00:05:38.040 but they're going after the Conservatives
00:05:39.220 because a bunch of their money in the budget
00:05:41.540 is from tariffs.
00:05:44.080 They're going to put counter tariffs on
00:05:45.840 and $20 billion over four years
00:05:47.600 is going to come from those tariffs.
00:05:49.400 Yes, but the whole point is that
00:05:50.660 if those tariffs don't get put into place,
00:05:53.300 if the trade issue resolves itself,
00:05:55.040 a bunch of the things that the Conservatives
00:05:56.560 are committing to spending money on
00:05:58.000 are no longer required
00:05:59.400 because it was only going to be required
00:06:01.500 if there was a trade war.
00:06:03.260 So a bunch of that money was like a contingency plan.
00:06:06.440 So if the trade war started up,
00:06:08.080 they would spend the $20 billion on that
00:06:10.680 and they would get it through tariff revenues.
00:06:12.960 If that doesn't happen,
00:06:13.960 they don't need the $20 billion in revenue
00:06:15.720 to pay for the $20 billion in relief.
00:06:18.240 I don't know why I have to explain this.
00:06:20.840 So now let's move on to some other clips,
00:06:23.660 some other posts that the liberals
00:06:25.580 and liberal influencers have been making
00:06:27.640 to attack the Conservatives.
00:06:28.920 Here is this lady, Laura Babcock,
00:06:32.720 a big Trudeau and Carney fan,
00:06:35.460 attacking the Conservatives
00:06:36.460 because they've been getting endorsements
00:06:38.560 from police associations and unions.
00:06:41.100 So down here, you can see breaking.
00:06:42.780 Toronto Police Association endorses Pierre Polyev.
00:06:46.000 And above, Laura Babcock says,
00:06:49.100 this mega S makes me sick.
00:06:51.580 Forget about the separation of church and state.
00:06:54.140 We can't even keep the separation
00:06:55.840 of Conservatives and cops.
00:06:57.240 Sorry, was that ever a thing?
00:06:59.560 Were cops not allowed to have opinions
00:07:02.200 on which criminal justice plan they like better?
00:07:05.940 That seems pretty straightforward to me.
00:07:08.360 So apparently, this is Donald Trump
00:07:11.260 make America great again stuff
00:07:12.920 because the police,
00:07:15.100 the many police associations around Canada,
00:07:18.180 like Polyev's plan on criminal justice
00:07:20.500 better than the liberals' plan.
00:07:23.220 If it goes without saying,
00:07:25.340 if the liberals got the endorsement
00:07:27.940 and the Conservatives did not,
00:07:30.060 Laura Babcock would be entirely okay with it
00:07:32.860 because I've never seen anyone on the left
00:07:36.140 ever say separation of, you know,
00:07:39.240 like of politics and police
00:07:41.160 or whatever she was going on about.
00:07:42.720 What was that line she was using?
00:07:44.020 She said separation of Conservatives and cops.
00:07:46.620 I've literally never heard that line
00:07:48.780 before Laura Babcock.
00:07:49.880 So she's just making up
00:07:52.380 some sort of like offense
00:07:54.100 to be offended at
00:07:55.440 because it doesn't go the liberals' way.
00:07:58.380 That is it.
00:07:59.040 This is another, again,
00:08:00.100 shallow attack on the Conservatives.
00:08:02.900 Here's another one.
00:08:05.220 Here's him going after Mark Carney,
00:08:07.200 going after Pierre Polly,
00:08:08.140 for being a Donald Trump copycat.
00:08:10.020 All of this stuff is silly
00:08:12.900 because if you take a Conservative
00:08:14.680 from any part of the world,
00:08:16.660 if you take a Conservative
00:08:17.820 from Myanmar and you,
00:08:19.800 or maybe not Myanmar,
00:08:20.740 but you get my point,
00:08:21.480 like if you take a Conservative
00:08:22.860 from Nepal
00:08:23.640 and you contrast it
00:08:25.520 with a Conservative
00:08:26.200 from Peru
00:08:27.000 and then Canada
00:08:27.880 and then the UK
00:08:28.740 and then Spain,
00:08:30.000 they are going to sound the same
00:08:31.260 on a lot of issues
00:08:32.140 because Conservatism
00:08:34.020 is an ideology.
00:08:35.660 And outside of places
00:08:36.600 where Conservatism means
00:08:37.720 a very different thing,
00:08:38.740 like, again,
00:08:39.560 I actually brought up
00:08:40.500 Myanmar for a reason
00:08:41.440 because Conservatives
00:08:42.180 might mean like an Islamist
00:08:43.760 or something like that.
00:08:44.800 Generally, Conservatives
00:08:45.560 are going to be like free market.
00:08:47.760 They're going to want
00:08:48.580 generally smaller government,
00:08:50.200 less regulations.
00:08:51.580 They're not going to like
00:08:52.400 social progressivism overall
00:08:54.380 or at least state-enforced
00:08:55.840 social progressivism
00:08:56.880 in certain institutions.
00:08:58.540 So when they keep saying,
00:09:00.300 oh, he's copying Trump,
00:09:01.140 like, you mean they're Conservatives?
00:09:02.920 They aren't even exactly alike.
00:09:04.560 There's not many people
00:09:05.340 on planet Earth
00:09:06.580 like Donald Trump.
00:09:07.400 But acting like,
00:09:09.100 oh my goodness,
00:09:09.560 these two people are the same.
00:09:10.980 If you're being honest,
00:09:11.740 you'd be like,
00:09:12.220 oh my goodness,
00:09:12.740 these two people are Conservatives.
00:09:16.420 You have to distinguish
00:09:17.740 between what you can change
00:09:20.320 and what you can't.
00:09:22.720 What you can change
00:09:23.900 and what you can.
00:09:25.220 And after 78 years,
00:09:27.220 I don't think we can change
00:09:28.920 President Trump.
00:09:29.720 So what we need,
00:09:33.940 what we need is a leader
00:09:35.860 and a party that can stand up to him.
00:09:41.240 By the way,
00:09:44.160 a lot of liberals should be asked
00:09:45.620 about their criticism of Polly
00:09:47.880 for using too many slogans.
00:09:49.900 Is Carney not full
00:09:51.140 of just more platitudes?
00:09:53.740 His entire rallies,
00:09:54.620 I've had people go to them.
00:09:55.840 I've watched them.
00:09:56.520 It is a lot of this.
00:09:57.680 We need to stand up.
00:09:59.060 And we can't stand up weakly.
00:10:00.720 We must stand up strong.
00:10:02.440 We will never be the United States.
00:10:04.860 It's ridiculous.
00:10:05.500 It's ridiculous.
00:10:05.700 That is not,
00:10:14.300 that leader is not
00:10:15.460 Pierre Polyev.
00:10:17.380 No.
00:10:19.400 He draws his inspiration.
00:10:21.840 He draws his inspiration
00:10:23.080 from President Trump.
00:10:24.380 He copies his ideas.
00:10:26.340 His first instinct,
00:10:28.240 Polyev's first instinct
00:10:29.340 when our nation was attacked
00:10:31.060 was to call Canada stupid.
00:10:34.140 That didn't happen.
00:10:38.140 I hate this.
00:10:39.300 This has been one
00:10:40.120 of the dumbest lines.
00:10:40.960 They've literally made billboards
00:10:42.200 out of it,
00:10:42.960 saying that Polyev said,
00:10:44.600 it's not the Americans' fault.
00:10:47.100 Canada's stupid.
00:10:48.180 And he's making the point
00:10:49.680 that Canada has been losing
00:10:52.340 on trade
00:10:53.240 and losing economic power
00:10:55.060 to the US
00:10:55.980 for years now.
00:10:57.400 And it's not because
00:10:58.380 the Americans have been stealing it.
00:10:59.780 It's because the Canadian,
00:11:01.700 like,
00:11:02.060 policy in Canada
00:11:03.100 sucks for economic growth.
00:11:05.000 It sucks for businesses.
00:11:06.120 It sucks for natural resources.
00:11:07.520 That's his point.
00:11:08.180 And he,
00:11:09.440 and Carney
00:11:10.080 has this lie
00:11:11.540 where, like,
00:11:12.220 Polyev was basically saying,
00:11:13.340 oh, yeah,
00:11:13.560 the Americans are right
00:11:14.660 on the trade issue.
00:11:15.600 That's not been his point.
00:11:17.240 His point is that,
00:11:18.380 overall,
00:11:18.820 if you are looking
00:11:19.620 at the economic problems
00:11:20.820 of Canada,
00:11:21.320 it really doesn't have
00:11:23.080 to do with the United States.
00:11:24.480 It has to do
00:11:25.060 with domestic policy.
00:11:26.980 It was our fault.
00:11:30.540 He even chooses,
00:11:31.600 Pierre Polyev even chooses
00:11:32.920 to be willfully blind
00:11:34.600 to the growing threats
00:11:36.320 facing Canada
00:11:37.160 by refusing,
00:11:39.280 for some reason,
00:11:41.520 to get his security clearance.
00:11:45.540 The stupid security,
00:11:46.900 didn't he get bodied enough
00:11:48.620 during the debate on this?
00:11:50.200 He asked Pierre Polyev
00:11:51.720 as his chance
00:11:52.800 to put a question to him
00:11:54.100 about not getting
00:11:55.000 the security clearance.
00:11:56.460 And, dude,
00:11:58.000 Carney looked pretty sour
00:11:59.440 a couple seconds
00:12:00.580 into Polyev's answer
00:12:01.700 because he started
00:12:02.460 going after Carney
00:12:03.340 for the fact that,
00:12:04.220 one, if he took
00:12:04.760 the security clearance,
00:12:05.640 he wouldn't be able
00:12:06.260 to speak about
00:12:07.420 Chinese foreign interference
00:12:08.600 in the election,
00:12:09.620 and that Carney refused
00:12:11.260 to get rid of his
00:12:12.320 pro-CCP candidate
00:12:13.560 who was talking
00:12:14.420 about having
00:12:15.340 a conservative
00:12:16.020 locked up
00:12:17.160 by the Chinese
00:12:18.320 Communist Party
00:12:19.060 because he had a bounty
00:12:19.900 on his head back
00:12:20.700 in, like, Hong Kong.
00:12:22.600 Did he do anything criminal?
00:12:24.100 No, unless you think
00:12:25.140 supporting democracy
00:12:26.120 is criminal
00:12:26.740 and organizing
00:12:27.780 some protests.
00:12:29.100 That is why
00:12:30.540 there is a million-dollar,
00:12:32.080 Hong Kong-dollar bounty
00:12:33.220 on Joe Tay's head
00:12:34.240 who Carney's candidate,
00:12:36.540 Paul Chang,
00:12:37.920 had basically told people
00:12:39.380 who should be arrested
00:12:40.440 and brought
00:12:41.040 to the Chinese consulate.
00:12:42.960 He refused
00:12:44.040 to get rid of Paul Chang.
00:12:45.760 And Carney is still
00:12:47.220 bringing up this issue
00:12:47.960 even though he got
00:12:48.640 absolutely roasted
00:12:50.300 during the debate
00:12:51.300 for bringing it up.
00:12:52.060 And here's something
00:12:53.560 I wanted to just
00:12:54.640 highlight here
00:12:55.300 because I thought
00:12:55.820 it was funny.
00:12:57.120 So here is a liberal
00:12:58.540 attack on Polyev
00:13:00.840 that they just posted
00:13:01.660 a few hours ago.
00:13:02.520 Then I want to contrast
00:13:03.300 it with something funny
00:13:04.380 that somebody posted.
00:13:06.100 So the liberals say,
00:13:06.880 Pierre Polyev is following
00:13:08.020 Trump's playbook.
00:13:09.580 I hate the stupid
00:13:10.920 playbook line.
00:13:11.900 People say,
00:13:12.620 oh, you've done something?
00:13:13.620 It's from this guy's
00:13:14.500 playbook.
00:13:15.480 Is it wrong?
00:13:17.040 Here it is.
00:13:17.680 There's a headline
00:13:18.820 from the Wall Street Journal
00:13:19.800 or an excerpt.
00:13:20.520 It says he supported
00:13:21.840 truckers who blockaded
00:13:23.040 Ottawa in 2022
00:13:24.080 to protest COVID-19
00:13:25.540 lockdowns.
00:13:26.600 He promised to slash taxes,
00:13:28.280 shrink the government,
00:13:29.560 end liberals,
00:13:30.520 climate change policies,
00:13:31.580 and end wokeism
00:13:32.240 in Canadian military.
00:13:33.760 His election slogans
00:13:34.800 such as Canada First
00:13:35.700 echo Trump's.
00:13:37.700 The liberals have said
00:13:38.560 Canada First in the past.
00:13:40.320 Is that wrong?
00:13:42.300 Did he say America First?
00:13:43.900 If he said America First,
00:13:45.220 that might be a problem
00:13:46.240 because he's running
00:13:46.960 to be the prime minister
00:13:48.180 of Canada.
00:13:49.320 But now it is a problem
00:13:50.500 to say Canada First
00:13:52.060 in Canada.
00:13:54.740 And sorry,
00:13:55.500 what's wrong
00:13:56.180 with some of this stuff?
00:13:56.860 He was supporting
00:13:57.460 the truckers
00:13:58.580 who are going to be
00:13:59.780 prevented from being,
00:14:01.180 from driving shipments
00:14:02.760 down to the United States
00:14:03.680 if they wouldn't get
00:14:04.720 the COVID-19 vaccine
00:14:06.480 and they wouldn't take
00:14:07.200 constant PCR tests,
00:14:09.580 which is ridiculous.
00:14:10.940 There was nobody
00:14:11.740 who was more isolated
00:14:12.720 in their jobs
00:14:13.340 than truckers
00:14:13.940 other than maybe
00:14:14.700 lighthouse keepers
00:14:16.480 and they were basically
00:14:18.300 going to be blocked
00:14:19.000 from being able
00:14:19.520 to do their job
00:14:20.220 so they protested.
00:14:21.340 Seems pretty logical
00:14:23.320 that they would protest
00:14:24.120 and then Pollywood
00:14:24.980 support them.
00:14:25.900 And even in here,
00:14:26.800 they say he promised
00:14:27.860 to slash taxes.
00:14:29.120 Good.
00:14:29.900 Shrink the government.
00:14:30.740 Good.
00:14:31.580 End liberal climate
00:14:32.360 change policies.
00:14:33.140 Well, the liberals
00:14:33.620 already did that
00:14:34.260 themselves.
00:14:35.540 And end wokeism.
00:14:36.660 Good.
00:14:37.780 Good.
00:14:38.040 Good.
00:14:39.320 What's the problem here?
00:14:40.640 They're going to end
00:14:41.680 progressive social messaging
00:14:43.920 in the government
00:14:44.720 that we shouldn't be
00:14:45.480 spending money on
00:14:46.240 and wasting our time with.
00:14:47.660 We don't need
00:14:48.200 conservative messaging.
00:14:49.220 We just don't need
00:14:50.000 any messaging.
00:14:50.960 The government should
00:14:51.500 just be running programs,
00:14:53.280 you know,
00:14:53.500 building public infrastructure,
00:14:55.220 doing stuff like that,
00:14:56.620 you know,
00:14:57.380 managing the military.
00:14:58.460 That is all the government
00:14:59.480 is supposed to do.
00:15:00.980 And getting rid of woke,
00:15:02.380 they're acting like
00:15:02.940 this is an offense,
00:15:03.860 like this is offensive
00:15:04.640 that the government
00:15:05.580 is not going to have
00:15:06.440 its own sort of like
00:15:07.700 ideology when it comes
00:15:09.060 to social issues.
00:15:10.240 There is some legislation
00:15:11.980 that is needed
00:15:12.720 around social issues
00:15:13.580 but the whole point
00:15:14.540 of ending wokeism
00:15:15.440 in government
00:15:15.920 is ending political
00:15:17.720 signaling in government,
00:15:19.700 in the bureaucracy,
00:15:21.080 in institutions,
00:15:22.340 you know,
00:15:22.660 in the education department,
00:15:24.840 stuff like that.
00:15:25.860 Purely logical.
00:15:27.080 And if Trump and Polyev
00:15:28.200 agree on that,
00:15:29.420 who cares?
00:15:30.860 It's like if Trump said
00:15:32.080 the best way to put out
00:15:33.120 a fire is to pour water
00:15:34.540 on it and Polyev
00:15:35.680 agreed with him,
00:15:36.500 that's apparently bad
00:15:37.560 and effectively,
00:15:38.560 we should actually agree
00:15:39.620 with Carney
00:15:40.900 that actually putting
00:15:41.980 battery acid on the fire
00:15:43.320 is a better idea
00:15:44.140 simply because
00:15:45.500 it wasn't what Trump said.
00:15:47.220 But this guy,
00:15:47.900 GM Forbes,
00:15:48.900 posted this
00:15:49.520 in response to that post
00:15:50.920 by the liberals
00:15:51.640 showing Donald Trump
00:15:53.100 at his photo op
00:15:54.940 at the McDonald's,
00:15:56.220 putting some fries
00:15:57.080 into a paper holder
00:16:00.700 and you have over here
00:16:02.400 Mark Carney
00:16:02.960 also putting some fries
00:16:04.540 onto somebody's order
00:16:06.340 at some other campaign
00:16:07.720 stop he was doing.
00:16:09.460 This is a silly comparison
00:16:10.980 comparison and it's meant
00:16:11.940 to be a silly comparison.
00:16:14.080 And so GM Forbes said
00:16:15.220 you were saying
00:16:15.960 in terms of the comparisons
00:16:17.680 between Donald Trump
00:16:18.880 and pure Polyev
00:16:19.600 and he's right.
00:16:21.200 Is this petty and shallow?
00:16:22.760 Is this a petty and shallow
00:16:23.700 comparison to make?
00:16:25.140 Yes.
00:16:25.940 But this is as shallow
00:16:27.280 as the comparisons
00:16:28.300 they've been making
00:16:29.440 to Polyev and Trump.
00:16:31.240 If Polyev even took
00:16:33.060 a photo in a McDonald's,
00:16:34.960 he would get compared
00:16:35.740 to Trump for a week
00:16:36.760 by the liberal campaign
00:16:37.900 and saying look
00:16:38.780 he's taking more pages
00:16:40.020 out of Donald Trump's playbook
00:16:41.260 but Carney can do
00:16:42.480 the same thing as Trump
00:16:43.320 and it's totally okay.
00:16:44.540 And guess what?
00:16:45.060 It is totally okay.
00:16:46.400 It's normal campaigning.
00:16:48.980 If Polyev even took
00:16:50.900 a photo near
00:16:51.920 a fast food restaurant
00:16:53.200 he'd probably get roasted
00:16:54.220 you know compared to Trump
00:16:55.720 compared to Putin
00:16:56.720 and then blamed
00:16:57.360 for the existence
00:16:58.100 of cloudy days
00:16:59.140 on planet Earth.
00:17:00.380 It's wild
00:17:01.400 just how shallow
00:17:03.060 the attacks
00:17:04.040 on the conservatives
00:17:05.280 have been.
00:17:05.720 Oh my goodness.
00:17:08.440 Here's a good video
00:17:10.160 from a liberal
00:17:11.180 pusher on social media
00:17:13.440 saying that Polyev
00:17:14.740 is going to take away
00:17:15.860 abortions.
00:17:17.140 He is going to legislate
00:17:18.380 against abortions
00:17:19.360 in Canada.
00:17:19.980 And by the way
00:17:20.480 I'm pro-life.
00:17:22.180 I think there should be
00:17:23.040 legislation
00:17:23.520 because we currently
00:17:24.360 have zero legislation.
00:17:26.160 Ban sex-selective abortions.
00:17:27.940 Ban extreme
00:17:28.940 late-term abortions.
00:17:30.060 Stuff that 80%
00:17:31.000 of the population
00:17:31.640 is on board with
00:17:32.440 if they knew
00:17:33.180 was actually legal
00:17:34.700 in Canada currently.
00:17:36.440 But even though
00:17:37.880 Polyev has explicitly
00:17:39.280 said he's not going
00:17:39.980 to touch the issue
00:17:40.740 you still have
00:17:42.360 liberal influencers
00:17:43.240 like this who are saying
00:17:44.080 no he's going to
00:17:45.680 do it anyways
00:17:46.420 because
00:17:47.280 I can guarantee you
00:17:48.620 there will be no
00:17:49.440 laws restricting
00:17:51.120 abortion pass.
00:17:54.300 I don't believe you
00:17:55.740 and let me tell you why.
00:17:58.580 Although the Supreme Court
00:18:00.060 has struck down
00:18:01.040 many attempts
00:18:02.620 a legislation
00:18:03.560 to criminalize.
00:18:05.960 They actually haven't.
00:18:07.100 They've just not done that.
00:18:09.540 There really hasn't been
00:18:10.440 any legislation passed.
00:18:11.560 She just fundamentally
00:18:12.560 doesn't understand
00:18:13.200 the issue.
00:18:15.340 Pierre Polyev
00:18:16.180 time and time again
00:18:17.180 has voted
00:18:18.100 for private bills
00:18:20.200 in the House of Commons
00:18:21.280 that would
00:18:22.400 restrict access
00:18:24.120 to
00:18:24.660 or
00:18:26.640 I don't know
00:18:27.100 why she won't say
00:18:27.720 the word
00:18:28.160 even though
00:18:28.580 she already played
00:18:29.020 a clip
00:18:29.360 with the word
00:18:29.820 in it.
00:18:30.720 Yeah Polyev
00:18:31.380 actually had a very
00:18:32.500 solidly pro-life
00:18:33.460 voting record
00:18:34.120 before he became
00:18:35.000 leader
00:18:35.380 and guess what
00:18:36.160 he's voting for?
00:18:37.060 Stuff like
00:18:37.580 ending sex
00:18:38.380 selective abortion.
00:18:39.940 Things like
00:18:40.440 having increased
00:18:41.480 sentencing
00:18:42.180 for people
00:18:43.140 who kill
00:18:44.280 or assault
00:18:44.980 pregnant women
00:18:45.780 and cause them
00:18:46.660 like obviously
00:18:47.380 if the woman
00:18:49.020 dies
00:18:49.480 the baby
00:18:49.840 would die
00:18:50.180 too
00:18:50.420 or causing
00:18:51.260 a miscarriage
00:18:51.880 by assaulting her.
00:18:52.960 Very sensible
00:18:53.640 policies
00:18:54.160 that I think
00:18:54.760 people would be
00:18:55.640 shocked
00:18:56.100 that the liberals
00:18:57.040 and the NDP
00:18:57.600 and the Greens
00:18:58.180 and the bloc
00:18:58.760 all voted
00:18:59.260 against that.
00:19:00.340 I've said this
00:19:00.900 before
00:19:01.140 that's not even
00:19:02.080 like oh
00:19:02.600 I'm pro-life
00:19:03.480 you're pro-trice
00:19:04.060 that's just like
00:19:04.680 goblin behavior.
00:19:06.300 Melissa Lantzman
00:19:07.360 Michelle Rempel
00:19:08.640 a bunch of
00:19:09.680 well-known
00:19:10.480 red Tories
00:19:11.280 in the party
00:19:12.220 voted
00:19:13.140 on social issues
00:19:14.660 they tend to be
00:19:15.460 more progressive
00:19:16.180 they voted in favor
00:19:17.560 of that stuff
00:19:18.300 for increased
00:19:18.900 sentencing
00:19:19.360 because it's such
00:19:20.380 an obvious thing
00:19:21.280 to do
00:19:21.580 but the liberals
00:19:22.280 are so pro-abortion
00:19:24.780 they're not
00:19:25.880 just in favor
00:19:27.120 of access
00:19:27.580 they are pro-abortion
00:19:29.220 they couldn't even
00:19:30.460 vote to recognize
00:19:31.780 that there is
00:19:32.740 actual loss
00:19:33.880 in somebody
00:19:35.000 being assaulted
00:19:35.880 and miscarrying
00:19:36.700 when they did not
00:19:37.480 want to
00:19:38.080 but this person
00:19:40.160 is going to
00:19:40.700 project
00:19:41.140 this as
00:19:41.760 they're going
00:19:42.480 to you know
00:19:42.840 handmaid's tale
00:19:43.520 it's going to be
00:19:44.160 the handmaid's tale
00:19:44.860 of polyableness
00:19:45.500 or make it difficult
00:19:47.860 for women
00:19:48.500 to have access
00:19:49.940 to it
00:19:50.600 I have a huge
00:19:51.960 issue with that
00:19:53.140 considering that
00:19:54.260 if this government
00:19:54.960 is elected
00:19:55.740 although they can't
00:19:57.580 change the legislation
00:19:58.700 what they can do
00:19:59.740 is control
00:20:00.440 the funding
00:20:01.340 making it difficult
00:20:02.780 how does that
00:20:03.840 make it difficult
00:20:04.480 the fund
00:20:05.300 that the government
00:20:06.060 a taxpayer
00:20:06.760 doesn't have to pay
00:20:07.580 for it
00:20:08.000 that makes it
00:20:09.080 difficult
00:20:09.520 apparently
00:20:10.420 the government
00:20:11.720 is currently
00:20:12.320 making it difficult
00:20:13.200 for me to have
00:20:14.180 a car
00:20:14.500 because they're
00:20:14.840 not paying
00:20:15.280 for my car
00:20:15.900 the government
00:20:16.800 is making it
00:20:17.620 difficult
00:20:18.000 for me to
00:20:19.080 own a house
00:20:19.520 because they're
00:20:20.020 not paying
00:20:20.500 for my house
00:20:21.180 that is not
00:20:22.020 how things work
00:20:22.920 in reality
00:20:23.680 for women to have
00:20:24.820 access to these
00:20:25.960 services
00:20:26.460 and that is a
00:20:28.120 true threat
00:20:28.680 to women's
00:20:29.480 health rights
00:20:30.220 which is why
00:20:30.940 I will never
00:20:31.500 be voting for you
00:20:32.360 sir
00:20:32.660 it's not a right
00:20:34.560 to have people
00:20:35.320 pay for things
00:20:36.600 for you
00:20:37.140 that is
00:20:38.220 delusional
00:20:39.220 left-wing thinking
00:20:40.080 that rights
00:20:41.320 are actually
00:20:41.880 things the government
00:20:42.560 must provide you
00:20:43.480 you have a right
00:20:44.300 to housing
00:20:44.740 you have a right
00:20:46.520 to abortion care
00:20:47.400 you have a right
00:20:49.180 to like other
00:20:50.380 things
00:20:50.780 you know
00:20:51.140 you have a right
00:20:52.260 to all these
00:20:52.800 other things
00:20:53.180 that you're supposed
00:20:53.800 to go get
00:20:54.400 for yourself
00:20:54.900 as a responsible
00:20:55.740 adult
00:20:56.240 obviously things
00:20:57.620 like housing
00:20:58.240 could be a right
00:20:58.920 for people
00:20:59.400 who genuinely
00:21:00.300 cannot provide
00:21:01.040 it for themselves
00:21:01.500 that's fine
00:21:02.220 but whenever
00:21:03.380 you start
00:21:03.860 to just
00:21:04.220 make things
00:21:05.000 rights
00:21:05.440 that any
00:21:06.220 reasonable
00:21:06.780 person
00:21:07.380 any functional
00:21:08.260 person
00:21:08.640 should be able
00:21:08.980 to go get
00:21:09.420 for themselves
00:21:10.120 it ends up
00:21:11.140 destroying society
00:21:12.080 because now
00:21:12.660 everyone is a
00:21:13.640 taker
00:21:13.980 and not actually
00:21:14.920 somebody who
00:21:15.600 makes and provides
00:21:16.740 services and resources
00:21:18.120 but that should
00:21:19.860 probably be obvious
00:21:20.640 for all of you
00:21:21.180 in the audience
00:21:21.760 here's another guy
00:21:23.560 going after
00:21:24.480 the conservatives
00:21:25.640 and he is talking
00:21:26.900 about how
00:21:27.780 you know
00:21:28.220 we gotta say no
00:21:28.980 to fascism
00:21:29.700 in Canada
00:21:30.160 apparently
00:21:30.660 guys
00:21:31.060 we gotta go
00:21:31.420 we gotta say
00:21:31.980 no to fascism
00:21:32.900 I believe
00:21:33.580 this is a liberal
00:21:34.200 influencer
00:21:34.720 might be
00:21:35.100 NDP
00:21:35.420 who knows
00:21:35.960 I believe
00:21:36.900 so
00:21:37.120 like
00:21:37.380 what is
00:21:38.600 how would
00:21:39.340 the person
00:21:39.580 set this clip
00:21:40.180 up
00:21:40.460 they say
00:21:41.000 everything
00:21:42.000 Dan
00:21:42.320 Megan
00:21:43.280 says
00:21:43.700 say no
00:21:44.700 to fascism
00:21:45.300 and uncertainty
00:21:46.960 vote
00:21:47.480 Mark Carney
00:21:48.140 oh my goodness
00:21:49.800 quick reminder
00:21:51.320 Canada
00:21:51.720 that April 28th
00:21:52.620 is our national
00:21:53.140 election
00:21:53.560 it's also my
00:21:54.260 birthday
00:21:54.600 I will be
00:21:55.420 voting for
00:21:55.860 sovereignty
00:21:56.340 cultural sovereignty
00:21:57.300 political sovereignty
00:21:58.300 for the arts
00:21:59.260 for culture
00:21:59.860 for CBC
00:22:00.460 for climate
00:22:01.260 it's sovereignty
00:22:03.420 by taking
00:22:04.260 taxpayer money
00:22:05.120 and giving it
00:22:06.320 to the deeply
00:22:07.600 uncreative
00:22:08.540 and untalented
00:22:09.280 people who work
00:22:10.160 at the CBC
00:22:10.840 because we need
00:22:12.380 more CBC
00:22:13.080 gem shows
00:22:13.920 apparently
00:22:14.340 have you guys
00:22:15.140 ever sat
00:22:15.740 through a CBC
00:22:16.680 gem show
00:22:17.500 it's akin
00:22:18.560 to torture
00:22:19.560 it is actually
00:22:20.960 the least funny
00:22:21.680 thing you've seen
00:22:22.200 in your life
00:22:22.600 if you try and
00:22:23.260 watch a gem
00:22:24.620 comedy
00:22:25.140 in fact
00:22:25.800 probably the
00:22:26.320 dramas are
00:22:26.780 funnier
00:22:27.180 because of
00:22:27.600 the terrible
00:22:28.000 acting
00:22:28.500 no
00:22:29.480 I'm standing
00:22:30.980 up for
00:22:31.320 the sovereignty
00:22:32.260 of our arts
00:22:32.840 and culture
00:22:33.340 by having it
00:22:34.380 controlled by
00:22:34.940 the government
00:22:35.340 good job sir
00:22:36.960 for integrity
00:22:38.120 for accountability
00:22:39.700 for thoughtfulness
00:22:40.660 for kindness
00:22:41.240 for empathy
00:22:41.900 for social
00:22:42.540 infrastructure
00:22:43.140 oh my goodness
00:22:44.360 guys we have
00:22:44.940 to vote
00:22:45.240 Carney
00:22:45.660 we're going
00:22:46.080 to have
00:22:46.660 empathy
00:22:47.740 leave the
00:22:49.060 country
00:22:49.440 what is this
00:22:50.540 we're going
00:22:51.180 to have
00:22:51.400 empathy
00:22:51.880 leave
00:22:52.320 I got to
00:22:53.600 get back
00:22:54.020 to that
00:22:54.440 also I like
00:22:55.440 to be down
00:22:55.820 here a little
00:22:56.180 bit more
00:22:56.440 on screen
00:22:56.660 I have to
00:22:57.860 hear that
00:22:58.140 again
00:22:58.460 for accountability
00:22:59.640 for thoughtfulness
00:23:00.620 for kindness
00:23:01.220 guys you can't
00:23:02.740 be thoughtful
00:23:03.280 if Pierre Pali
00:23:03.920 becomes the
00:23:04.520 prime minister
00:23:05.060 thoughtfulness
00:23:06.040 will be banned
00:23:06.700 empathy
00:23:07.520 will be banned
00:23:08.100 kindness
00:23:08.660 will be banned
00:23:09.600 empathy
00:23:10.100 for social
00:23:10.760 infrastructure
00:23:11.400 voting
00:23:12.100 against
00:23:12.900 fascism
00:23:13.580 what is social
00:23:14.320 infrastructure
00:23:14.860 oh he's
00:23:15.420 voting against
00:23:16.180 fascism
00:23:16.900 guys
00:23:17.280 what a hero
00:23:18.260 against this
00:23:19.480 creeping
00:23:20.160 alpha
00:23:20.700 incel
00:23:21.400 BS
00:23:22.360 fake
00:23:22.960 manosphere
00:23:23.700 garbage
00:23:24.400 paper
00:23:25.260 thin
00:23:25.720 skinned
00:23:27.040 volatility
00:23:27.640 driven
00:23:28.460 meme stock
00:23:29.240 politicians
00:23:29.900 on the
00:23:30.300 right
00:23:30.540 who are
00:23:31.220 did this
00:23:32.040 guy swallow
00:23:32.700 a thesaurus
00:23:33.400 or something
00:23:33.860 before he
00:23:34.380 made this
00:23:34.760 video
00:23:35.020 I don't
00:23:35.620 know what
00:23:36.040 he's even
00:23:36.720 getting at
00:23:37.760 here
00:23:38.000 Polyev in
00:23:39.160 the manosphere
00:23:39.940 did he start
00:23:41.620 campaigning with
00:23:42.200 Andrew Tate
00:23:42.760 and I didn't
00:23:43.140 notice
00:23:43.520 only relevant
00:23:44.920 if the water
00:23:45.540 is choppy
00:23:46.220 be done
00:23:47.140 with it
00:23:47.500 holy shit
00:23:48.280 can we move
00:23:49.000 on from
00:23:49.600 this garbage
00:23:50.200 what is
00:23:50.880 the bottom
00:23:51.660 of this
00:23:52.080 barrel
00:23:52.520 and can
00:23:53.220 we lift
00:23:54.380 to a
00:23:54.860 version
00:23:55.360 of humanity
00:23:56.020 that is
00:23:56.480 some sort
00:23:57.300 of shared
00:23:57.980 truth
00:23:58.520 about
00:23:58.860 what is
00:24:00.040 real
00:24:00.500 do you
00:24:01.260 not want
00:24:01.580 what's
00:24:01.800 happening
00:24:02.060 in the
00:24:02.340 states
00:24:02.560 happening
00:24:02.900 in Canada
00:24:03.440 constant
00:24:04.180 threat
00:24:04.580 to
00:24:04.780 everything
00:24:05.300 markets
00:24:06.280 tumbling
00:24:06.800 constant
00:24:07.840 chaos
00:24:08.340 division
00:24:08.940 did they
00:24:09.720 not care
00:24:10.180 about the
00:24:10.460 economy
00:24:10.800 failing
00:24:11.300 over the
00:24:11.820 past
00:24:12.080 10 years
00:24:12.580 did they
00:24:13.300 not care
00:24:13.760 about the
00:24:14.060 GDP
00:24:14.380 per capita
00:24:15.140 going
00:24:15.860 down
00:24:16.060 in the
00:24:16.220 past
00:24:16.460 five
00:24:16.700 years
00:24:16.880 this is
00:24:17.620 what I
00:24:17.840 consider
00:24:18.080 an
00:24:18.300 aesthetic
00:24:18.740 voter
00:24:19.140 this guy
00:24:20.200 wants to
00:24:20.740 vote
00:24:21.000 because he
00:24:21.740 wants to
00:24:22.200 aesthetically
00:24:22.820 be against
00:24:23.280 fascism
00:24:23.820 he wants
00:24:24.500 to be
00:24:24.800 aesthetically
00:24:25.600 a thoughtful
00:24:26.220 kind
00:24:26.640 empathetic
00:24:27.120 person
00:24:27.560 and
00:24:28.120 Apolly
00:24:28.420 have
00:24:28.560 wins
00:24:29.000 we're
00:24:29.640 just
00:24:29.780 not a
00:24:30.100 kind
00:24:30.600 thoughtful
00:24:31.140 empathetic
00:24:31.640 country
00:24:31.960 because
00:24:32.220 apparently
00:24:32.720 your guys
00:24:33.720 are the
00:24:33.960 good
00:24:34.140 ones
00:24:34.480 and the
00:24:35.140 other
00:24:35.280 guys
00:24:35.500 are the
00:24:35.720 bad
00:24:36.120 ones
00:24:36.480 I
00:24:37.280 don't
00:24:37.680 even
00:24:37.940 exact
00:24:38.300 I'm
00:24:38.560 not like
00:24:39.220 oh
00:24:39.560 the liberals
00:24:40.000 are bad
00:24:40.640 people
00:24:41.060 they just
00:24:41.760 have
00:24:42.060 like
00:24:42.760 plans
00:24:43.200 that are
00:24:43.420 not
00:24:43.600 good
00:24:43.960 it's
00:24:44.560 that
00:24:44.840 they're
00:24:45.120 doubling
00:24:45.400 down
00:24:45.760 on
00:24:45.940 things
00:24:46.140 that I
00:24:46.360 think
00:24:49.140 mass
00:24:53.300 immigration
00:24:53.780 has not
00:24:54.160 been good
00:24:54.480 for the
00:24:54.720 economy
00:24:55.120 or social
00:24:55.840 cohesion
00:24:56.360 you can't
00:24:56.780 have
00:24:57.020 3%
00:24:57.960 of your
00:24:58.220 population
00:24:58.800 entering
00:24:59.140 the country
00:24:59.580 every year
00:25:00.060 with not
00:25:00.660 enough
00:25:00.900 housing
00:25:01.220 for everybody
00:25:01.860 and think
00:25:02.480 this is
00:25:02.840 not going
00:25:03.160 to cause
00:25:03.580 more than
00:25:04.200 one type
00:25:04.780 of problem
00:25:05.400 but no
00:25:06.460 we need
00:25:08.180 to stand
00:25:08.460 up for
00:25:08.700 fascism
00:25:09.800 guys
00:25:10.100 because
00:25:10.360 Pierre
00:25:10.660 Polyev
00:25:11.100 a man
00:25:11.860 who wants
00:25:12.180 to shrink
00:25:12.660 government
00:25:13.040 and give
00:25:13.380 you back
00:25:13.720 some of
00:25:13.980 your own
00:25:14.240 money
00:25:14.500 he is
00:25:15.200 representing
00:25:15.820 fascism
00:25:16.420 apparently
00:25:16.840 because
00:25:17.100 Benito
00:25:17.500 Mussolini
00:25:18.060 was famous
00:25:19.000 for reducing
00:25:20.200 the size
00:25:20.640 of government
00:25:21.140 fear-mongering
00:25:22.380 we can make
00:25:23.520 a choice
00:25:24.000 in Canada
00:25:24.980 all you have
00:25:25.660 is dangerous
00:25:26.300 he's maple
00:25:27.460 MAGA
00:25:27.880 he will
00:25:28.680 get the
00:25:29.220 copper
00:25:29.560 wiring
00:25:30.020 out of
00:25:30.280 the walls
00:25:30.720 of this
00:25:31.060 country
00:25:31.420 and sell
00:25:32.060 it
00:25:32.220 Canada
00:25:32.960 is at
00:25:33.340 a
00:25:33.480 total
00:25:34.100 crossroads
00:25:38.860 liberal
00:25:39.160 party
00:25:39.500 is not
00:25:39.820 perfect
00:25:40.280 Kanye
00:25:40.900 is not
00:25:41.220 perfect
00:25:41.520 but he
00:25:41.860 is an
00:25:42.120 adult
00:25:42.700 Polyev's
00:25:44.640 not an
00:25:45.020 adult
00:25:45.360 you can't
00:25:45.880 vote for
00:25:46.360 him
00:25:46.480 the man
00:25:47.000 he's not
00:25:47.840 even an
00:25:48.240 adult
00:25:48.680 at the
00:25:49.020 table
00:25:49.420 he doesn't
00:25:50.300 thrive on
00:25:50.760 chaos
00:25:51.100 he can
00:25:51.620 consider
00:25:52.380 an answer
00:25:52.900 and thoughtfully
00:25:53.560 explain it
00:25:54.260 like an
00:25:55.040 adult
00:25:55.560 luckily there
00:25:56.400 yeah
00:25:57.140 Polyev the
00:25:58.080 man who
00:25:58.680 does
00:25:59.040 long-form
00:25:59.640 interviews
00:26:00.040 cannot put
00:26:00.640 a coherent
00:26:01.200 thought together
00:26:02.000 but Carney
00:26:02.800 the man
00:26:03.260 who has
00:26:03.580 not done
00:26:04.000 a long-form
00:26:05.240 interview
00:26:05.560 this entire
00:26:06.100 election
00:26:06.460 he's
00:26:07.160 he's your
00:26:07.620 ticket
00:26:07.900 the man
00:26:08.360 who we
00:26:09.220 literally
00:26:09.580 have an
00:26:10.080 um and
00:26:10.360 ah
00:26:10.560 counter for
00:26:11.280 in some
00:26:11.700 of the
00:26:11.940 videos
00:26:12.360 because he
00:26:13.180 is so
00:26:13.540 bad at
00:26:13.840 articulating
00:26:14.400 himself
00:26:14.740 in press
00:26:15.200 conferences
00:26:15.700 that guy
00:26:16.700 can
00:26:17.040 that guy
00:26:17.960 if you're
00:26:18.260 looking for
00:26:18.620 someone to
00:26:19.000 lay down
00:26:19.360 a thought
00:26:19.900 like a
00:26:20.700 carpenter
00:26:21.400 putting like
00:26:22.420 putting laying
00:26:23.400 down boards
00:26:24.560 you want
00:26:25.500 Mark Carney
00:26:26.100 are tools you
00:26:27.400 can use to
00:26:27.840 figure out who
00:26:28.380 in your writing
00:26:28.920 has the best
00:26:29.520 chance of beating
00:26:30.140 your local
00:26:30.580 conservative so
00:26:31.260 we're not
00:26:31.620 splitting the
00:26:32.140 vote we can
00:26:32.980 vote strategically
00:26:33.920 338 Canada
00:26:35.340 or vote well
00:26:36.280 there's a few
00:26:36.740 other ones check
00:26:37.460 it out do some
00:26:38.480 research figure out
00:26:39.260 who in your
00:26:39.820 writing between
00:26:40.320 the greens the
00:26:41.000 NDP or the
00:26:42.520 liberal of course
00:26:43.340 has the best
00:26:44.300 chance
00:26:44.620 as soon as
00:26:45.940 you are talking
00:26:46.500 about strategic
00:26:47.140 voting like
00:26:47.740 this I don't
00:26:48.980 respect you
00:26:49.560 you don't have
00:26:50.780 any opinion
00:26:51.340 worth respecting
00:26:52.100 because you
00:26:52.880 are saying I
00:26:53.380 don't even care
00:26:54.040 who you vote
00:26:54.540 for I don't
00:26:55.060 care what
00:26:55.340 ideology it
00:26:56.040 is what their
00:26:56.400 platform is what
00:26:57.160 they say on
00:26:57.700 different issues
00:26:58.240 it's all it's
00:26:59.340 all equal
00:27:00.060 it's because he's
00:27:01.660 created a fake
00:27:02.800 political system
00:27:03.840 in his head
00:27:04.340 where there is
00:27:05.100 the good and
00:27:05.940 there is the
00:27:06.360 bad even though
00:27:07.500 the people on
00:27:08.200 the side of the
00:27:08.760 good have wildly
00:27:09.720 contrasting views
00:27:10.780 on certain
00:27:11.240 issues like
00:27:12.120 the greens and
00:27:12.800 the NDP just
00:27:13.760 being the wildly
00:27:14.540 pro-Hamas party
00:27:15.660 the liberals being
00:27:16.800 the ones who
00:27:17.260 pat them on the
00:27:17.860 head by the way
00:27:18.800 apparently that's
00:27:19.780 part of kindness
00:27:20.980 empathy and
00:27:22.260 thoughtfulness is
00:27:23.320 tut-tutting the
00:27:25.000 Hamas basically
00:27:26.880 saying guys stop
00:27:28.460 killing Jewish
00:27:29.340 people thanks but
00:27:31.340 we're still going
00:27:31.860 to fund UNRWA and
00:27:32.900 all these other
00:27:33.380 organizations that
00:27:34.240 you guys are
00:27:34.760 basically just using
00:27:36.120 as go-betweens to
00:27:37.400 get resources for
00:27:38.920 your terrorist
00:27:39.720 activities
00:27:40.380 and nuts
00:27:42.420 nuts that
00:27:43.220 people can
00:27:44.460 actually think
00:27:44.960 this way
00:27:45.440 the pro-terror
00:27:49.800 parties
00:27:50.300 the parties
00:27:51.160 who refuse
00:27:52.240 to call out
00:27:52.800 terrorism
00:27:53.300 those ones
00:27:54.820 are the ones
00:27:55.260 who basically
00:27:55.840 condemn Israel
00:27:56.780 every single
00:27:57.320 time something
00:27:57.820 happens in the
00:27:58.540 Middle East
00:27:59.000 and never have
00:28:00.200 a terse word
00:28:01.860 for Hamas
00:28:02.460 unless they
00:28:02.920 just murdered
00:28:04.000 a bunch of
00:28:04.440 people
00:28:04.760 those are the
00:28:05.680 people representing
00:28:06.380 thoughtfulness and
00:28:07.100 kindness
00:28:07.520 anyways okay
00:28:09.560 here's another
00:28:10.260 post by the
00:28:11.160 Liberal Party
00:28:11.720 of Canada
00:28:12.200 or actually it's
00:28:12.900 Carney Media but
00:28:13.680 it's from the
00:28:14.060 Liberal Party
00:28:14.580 and they say
00:28:15.940 Pierre Polyev says
00:28:17.260 he'll end woke
00:28:18.240 culture in the
00:28:18.780 military we've seen
00:28:20.040 that movie before
00:28:21.000 and then you have a
00:28:22.100 headline here from
00:28:22.940 AFP says Trump
00:28:24.180 fires first woman to
00:28:25.340 lead a US military
00:28:26.400 service
00:28:26.920 is that necessarily
00:28:29.800 a bad thing
00:28:30.440 did he fire her for
00:28:31.860 being a woman or
00:28:32.660 was she fired for
00:28:33.520 not being good at
00:28:34.120 her job it's like
00:28:35.220 if you say they
00:28:36.340 fired a man for
00:28:37.360 doing something and
00:28:38.160 I'm supposed to be
00:28:38.820 mad about it because
00:28:39.560 oh my goodness I
00:28:40.200 can't believe they
00:28:40.640 fired a man
00:28:41.300 what happened and
00:28:43.300 then Toronto Sun
00:28:43.900 here says Polyev
00:28:44.840 promises to end
00:28:45.700 woke culture in
00:28:46.340 military
00:28:46.720 good
00:28:49.160 good
00:28:50.640 our current
00:28:51.920 military acts
00:28:53.060 more like an HR
00:28:54.000 department
00:28:54.560 and it's an HR
00:28:56.780 department with a
00:28:57.480 few more firearms
00:28:58.260 that is literally
00:28:59.260 what the military
00:28:59.820 is at this point
00:29:00.560 we have no ability
00:29:01.660 to deploy troops
00:29:02.560 everywhere
00:29:03.080 anywhere I've heard
00:29:04.160 that the military
00:29:05.020 readiness for
00:29:05.840 reserves is about
00:29:06.800 maybe 30%
00:29:07.760 most of them could
00:29:08.760 not actually be
00:29:09.300 deployed in a war
00:29:10.320 zone there's a
00:29:11.360 reason why and I
00:29:12.360 feel bad for them
00:29:13.220 because it's not
00:29:13.720 their fault there's
00:29:14.600 a reason why there
00:29:15.820 was a parade in
00:29:16.760 Edmonton on Canada
00:29:17.960 day where you saw
00:29:18.880 troops who couldn't
00:29:19.860 even march in line
00:29:20.740 properly and it's
00:29:21.820 not again it's not
00:29:22.520 their fault it's the
00:29:23.800 leadership of the
00:29:24.360 military it's the
00:29:25.220 priorities and it's
00:29:26.080 the priorities
00:29:26.600 specifically of the
00:29:28.120 political side of the
00:29:29.720 military which is the
00:29:30.740 liberal government
00:29:31.460 because they don't
00:29:32.340 care about readiness
00:29:33.540 they don't care about
00:29:34.240 having offensive power
00:29:35.580 we don't have any
00:29:36.480 offensive power we
00:29:38.060 couldn't even get our
00:29:38.680 planes off the ground
00:29:39.500 these days
00:29:40.020 here is Mark Carney
00:29:43.600 once again going
00:29:44.520 after Polyev for
00:29:46.260 oh actually this is
00:29:47.060 just the same
00:29:47.600 it's actually a
00:29:48.920 different event
00:29:49.540 now I'm confused
00:29:51.920 so he's just repeating
00:29:52.760 the same line about
00:29:53.720 Trump never changing
00:29:55.280 and that we need
00:29:55.900 somebody who doesn't
00:29:57.120 copy Donald Trump
00:29:58.260 we can't I don't
00:30:00.160 think change
00:30:00.940 President Trump
00:30:02.100 78 years in I don't
00:30:04.480 think we're going to
00:30:04.920 change him so we
00:30:06.080 need a leader we need
00:30:07.480 a leader who can
00:30:08.200 stand up to him
00:30:09.000 yeah
00:30:10.320 what does that mean
00:30:12.920 bro what do you
00:30:14.780 think Polyev is just
00:30:15.560 going to be like just
00:30:16.120 have Saskatchewan just
00:30:17.480 do it just take
00:30:18.160 Saskatchewan what's
00:30:19.900 Mark he's going to
00:30:20.780 stand up and he's
00:30:21.640 going to stand up
00:30:22.300 strong
00:30:22.880 what does any of
00:30:25.660 this even mean
00:30:26.760 and that's not
00:30:30.780 that leader isn't
00:30:39.660 that leader isn't
00:30:41.300 Pierre Polyev
00:30:42.220 no
00:30:44.460 no
00:30:45.280 he draws his
00:30:46.680 inspiration
00:30:47.280 his inspiration from
00:30:48.660 Trump he mimics
00:30:49.460 Trump
00:30:49.720 when has Polyev ever
00:30:51.580 cited Trump
00:30:52.380 when has he ever
00:30:53.480 cited him as a
00:30:54.500 positive it's never
00:30:56.020 happened but for the
00:30:57.460 liberals to win this
00:30:58.260 election they need you
00:30:59.540 to believe that it's
00:31:00.380 happened
00:31:00.720 anyways so that should
00:31:03.560 be it for this video
00:31:04.480 guys I will be back
00:31:05.660 later today maybe with
00:31:06.820 an update on how the
00:31:08.140 electoral map is
00:31:09.020 looking and what the
00:31:09.960 path to victory looked
00:31:11.020 like for the
00:31:11.940 conservatives and for
00:31:13.000 the liberal party it is
00:31:14.480 an extremely tight
00:31:15.340 election I could even
00:31:16.800 see this election ending
00:31:18.400 with the liberals and
00:31:19.500 conservatives only being
00:31:20.780 separated by a few
00:31:21.940 seats and in which we
00:31:23.780 will be basically
00:31:24.440 thrown into utter
00:31:25.400 chaos when it comes to
00:31:26.720 the makeup of
00:31:27.860 parliament but anyway
00:31:29.000 so make sure you guys
00:31:29.940 like this video
00:31:30.640 subscribe to the
00:31:31.360 channel if you're not
00:31:32.000 yet a subscriber leave
00:31:33.280 a comment do all that
00:31:34.860 great stuff helps me in
00:31:35.940 the algorithm and I do
00:31:36.880 like to read people's
00:31:37.720 comments over the next
00:31:39.080 few days and you know
00:31:40.760 thanks for all the
00:31:41.360 support guys and I'll
00:31:42.160 see you next time