The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - May 12, 2026


Liberal Voter Fraud Scandal could become BIG Headache for Carney!

Hosted by
Mentioned
69% Disapprove of Carney Fake Pipeline Plan - No Liberal Achievements! CBC Excuses Voter Fraud & Liberal MP resigns after losing rigged election!

Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

167.31

Word count

4,451

Sentence count

225

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

12

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Nate Erskine-smith is preparing to challenge his loss in the Ontario Liberal nomination for Scarborough Southwest. In this video, we break down the numbers and prove to you that this was a fraudulent nomination and the man who won it is a fraud.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.
00:00:06 Buckle up, kids, because we're going to be talking a lot more about the Scarborough Southwest
00:00:12 Ontario Liberal nomination than you have ever wanted to hear about in your entire lives.
00:00:18 But I promise you, it will be interesting. The ongoing Ontario and Federal Liberal Circular
00:00:25 firing squad will be hilarious to witness, but I do believe that this is an extremely important
00:00:31 issue that a lot of people are not taking seriously. So Nate Erskine-Smith, this is
00:00:38 breaking as of a few hours ago, is preparing to challenge his loss in the Ontario Liberal nomination
00:00:44 for Scarborough Southwest. As you may know, it's a very long and complicated story.
00:00:50 He is the current Liberal MP for Beaches East York, but his heart lies in Ontario Liberal politics.
00:00:59 Now, the riding of Scarborough Southwest provincially came available because the sitting NDP MPP, Dolly Begum, left to take over for Bill Blair,
00:01:09 who had left the federal version of the Scarborough Southwest riding.
00:01:13 She ran as a Liberal and is now sitting in the House of Commons as a Liberal for that riding.
00:01:19 Erskine-Smith announced his candidacy to replace basically Dolly Begum,
00:01:23 but instead of running for the NDP, he was running for the Ontario Liberals.
00:01:27 A giant nomination ensued, and he lost by only 19 votes.
00:01:33 Now, everyone has been heavily clowning on Nate Erskine-Smith,
00:01:37 and 364 out of 365 days, I would normally be clowning on Nate Erskine-Smith along with all of you.
00:01:46 But I actually do take nomination rigging very seriously as someone who has been kicked out of a nomination in the past,
00:01:54 simply because party insiders did not want me to win the Calgary-Signal Hill federal conservative nomination.
00:02:01 So today we are going to break down the corruption that took place here and the massive dramatic fallout that this could have,
00:02:08 not only for the Ontario Liberals, but also for the federal Liberals.
00:02:13 Even though Mark Carney technically endorsed Nate Erskine-Smith, I don't think he actually
00:02:18 wanted him to win this nomination, because if he did, and then he won the by-election
00:02:22 for Scarborough Southwest, he would be out of the Federal Liberal Caucus, and Mark Carney
00:02:27 would not just be down one Liberal MP, he'd be down two, because as you may know, Jonathan
00:02:33 Wilkinson, or the riding of Vancouver, or North Vancouver Capilano, is retiring this
00:02:39 June.
00:02:39 take a breath people it's going to be a lot of stuff like this going on in just a second here
00:02:46 I want to break down the numbers and prove to you that this was a fraudulent nomination and the man
00:02:51 who won who I believe his name is Asahul Hafiz I'm never going to get used to saying that name
00:03:00 is in fact a fraud store or or at least basically benefiting from the Ontario Liberal Party
00:03:06 committing fraud on his behalf. But before I get into this video, guys, I actually have
00:03:12 a special announcement for those of you who live in the Saskatchewan federal riding of Yorkton
00:03:18 Melville. You have a nomination race coming up very shortly here. Kathy Wagenthal, a fantastic
00:03:25 conservative MP, is not planning on running in the next election. And the time to buy a membership 1.00
00:03:32 and participate in this nomination is coming up very quickly. So in the spirit of this video about
00:03:39 nominations, I will be linking a federal conservative party membership link in the
00:03:45 description below and pinned at the top of the comments. There's a couple very good, very socially
00:03:50 conservative candidates that will do a great job of replacing. Kathy Wagenthal and one Red Tory
00:03:56 who you'll want to avoid. I'll fill in the blanks a little bit later in that I will be linking the
00:04:01 recommended candidates below with the membership, but I'm just not going to get too much into detail.
00:04:06 But the cutoff for buying a membership for this Yorkton-Melville race is in just a few days. It's
00:04:12 on Friday. So if you live in that riding, do take that seriously. Nominations matter a lot more than
00:04:19 you think in this country. But anyways, you might be wondering what these numbers on the whiteboard
00:04:25 are? Well, 3,581 were the amount of eligible voters in this Ontario Liberal nomination for
00:04:34 Scarborough Southwest. This number is the amount of memberships that, in theory, should have been
00:04:41 part of this number. But what many of the people who are pointing and laughing at Nate Erskine
00:04:47 Smith, both on the right and the left, are not actually, you know, highlighting is the fact that
00:04:53 they deleted, the Ontario Liberal Party deleted 1,806 memberships before the vote was actually
00:05:00 held. And remember, Hafiz beat Erskine Smith by just 19 votes. I'll write that number down
00:05:07 on the board too, just so you guys can visualize how close this race was. Hafiz won
00:05:14 with 718 votes. With NES, we will say, what am I doing? Terrible. I'm starting off with a knee.
00:05:26 My mind is fried, guys. With Nate Erskine-Smith winning, of course, 699 votes. This is an extremely,
00:05:40 extremely tight election and as I get into the variety of shenanigans going on it will become
00:05:48 quite clear that Nate Erskine-Smith did win again you don't have to like his politics I don't like
00:05:54 his politics if I was living in Ontario I wouldn't even be voting for Doug Ford he's too much of a
00:05:58 liberal I would be voting for the new blue party of Ontario which I actually encourage people to
00:06:03 join if you're in that province because all the other options suck again obviously what I'm doing
00:06:09 here is not an endorsement of Mr. Erskine Smith. I don't really like him as a politician, but I do
00:06:14 stand up for people who get cheated. So the actual, the Ontario Liberal Party claims that in the pile
00:06:22 of memberships that were cancelled, some of them were purely duplicates. They say it was about
00:06:29 541 duplicates. So let's do DL right there. We had 541 duplicates, but that leaves 1,000.
00:06:41 Oh my goodness, I hate when things don't write down well. That leaves us with 1,265 memberships
00:06:51 that were considered invalid. Now, maybe there are that many memberships that are invalid.
00:06:59 I kind of doubt it. That's an incredible amount of memberships to be taken. That's around one
00:07:04 quarter of all the memberships being invalidated in the race. And I'm just going to calculate this
00:07:11 together. We'll assume the duplicates are actually duplicates. They're not lying. That's genuinely
00:07:16 what happened so if we add 3081 to 1265 we come out with an amount of memberships that should
00:07:25 have been active in theory in this race being 4846 memberships now when you actually read the
00:07:37 articles because this to show you guys this was from the globin mail this was not some sort of
00:07:43 like, you know, conspiracy theory website. This was the Globe and Mails reporting on what had
00:07:48 gone down. Now, Erskine Smith had actually protested this quite heavily. And so I want
00:07:55 to show you right here. Mr. Oh, wait, I've got to find it here. Yeah, Mr. Erskine Smith's campaign
00:08:02 is pushing back against the removals. Spokesperson Alex Spears says the campaign is concerned about
00:08:07 the 1265 memberships deemed invalid, which make up about a quarter of the total applications,
00:08:12 the party has received. Mr. Spears blamed the party's new two-step email verification process
00:08:18 as the reason a bulk of memberships were rejected and called on the party to allow the applications
00:08:23 to vote. Quote, a party in need of grassroots inaugural and rebuilding shouldn't be making it
00:08:28 harder than necessary for members to vote, Mr. Spears said in a statement. Now, the problem with
00:08:34 those very complicated verification processes, and that is what's going on right now in the
00:08:39 in the British Columbia Conservative Party leadership, is the more complicated you make
00:08:44 a system, the easier it is to just kind of invalidate a bunch of people as not being
00:08:50 members. And what you'll notice is although Mr. Hafiz, as we'll be getting into, had really bad
00:08:57 problems with members who didn't actually know how to speak the English language and needed
00:09:02 everything translated into Bengali and told exactly who to vote for, somehow he, in this
00:09:08 article said how many did he lose all the other campaigns said that they had potentially lost
00:09:13 hundreds of memberships that they had lost you know several dozen if not hundreds in the case
00:09:19 of somebody like Erskine Smith how many did Mr. Hafiz lose well he never gave a specific number
00:09:25 he said he lost a few yes while other candidates are missing potentially hundreds Mr. Hafiz lost
00:09:35 a few on the final tally sheet. So when the number went from 4846 to 3581, he lost a few,
00:09:45 while other people had lost hundreds. Now, I want to get back to my social media tab here,
00:09:52 so I can show you just how absurd the whole thing was. Again, Erskine Smith, the guy who has been
00:09:58 elected five times in Beaches East York, is kind of, I would at least say, as close as you can get
00:10:03 to a household name in Ontario liberal political circles. As you can get, he came second place to
00:10:08 Bonnie Crombie in the last leadership race. That guy lost to Mr. Hafiz, who, as we will be getting
00:10:15 into later, has people charged with very vile sexual assault as campaign spokespeople for him
00:10:22 at events. He lost this guy on the right by 19 votes when that guy was having to hand out ballots
00:10:29 like this. Do you think that Mr. Hafiz would have been the more likely person to have all of his
00:10:36 people properly verified? Or is it more likely that the party was just letting his memberships
00:10:43 go and were artificially holding up memberships for other people? Because what then came out
00:10:49 was at the tables at this nomination, there were tons and tons of people who had suddenly lost
00:10:56 their driver's licenses and couldn't prove where they live. But in Ontario liberal politics,
00:11:01 party managers, party representatives on the floor of a nomination are allowed to arbitrarily just
00:11:06 say, I believe you can vote. You can't prove that the person lives in the riding. They don't
00:11:11 actually have a good identification, but you can go. That's fine. Whatever. Those people,
00:11:16 the people who are missing their driver's licenses, were somehow able to do the two-step
00:11:22 authentication for their memberships? I think
00:11:26 not. I think that that sounds a bit
00:11:29 nonsensical. In fact, so really, we had
00:11:33 1,265 memberships get removed.
00:11:39 Hafiz claimed he only lost a few and then
00:11:42 proceeded to beat Nate Erskine-Smith, the far more well-known candidate,
00:11:45 by 19 votes.
00:11:49 1265 removed and we just assume the duplicates are true 1265 removed and the guy wins by around
00:11:57 19 votes and of course they're probably gonna have to go through a recount again uh yeah this
00:12:03 doesn't make any sense to me and now let's get to that uh kind of questionable campaign surrogate 0.60
00:12:10 right there uh this one person mobius dick has been doing a good job of digging things up 0.93
00:12:15 on the winner, Hafiz, and he says, I have just been told that a man convicted of sexually 0.99
00:12:21 assaulting a 12-year-old girl was seen as a speaker at one of Mr. Hafiz's campaign events.
00:12:27 And as you can see here, here's a Toronto Star article that says, sex offender working as
00:12:31 principal of private tutoring program. Yasuf Ali Kalakunder was convicted of sexually assaulting
00:12:38 a student in 2010 because provincial authorities have no jurisdiction over private education.
00:12:43 he can work at his own after school program. So this creep was at Mr. Hafiz's, one of his events
00:12:50 speaking up there at the front, Mr. Hafiz is over here on the left. This man was speaking at his
00:12:56 event. And this isn't the only weird thing that has popped up about Mr. Hafiz when it comes to
00:13:01 kind of sexually, content with sexual connotations. But that is the man who the Liberal Party is
00:13:08 currently standing beside. And again, I hate that I even have to be covering this because
00:13:14 I'm a conservative. I am too conservative to vote for Doug Ford because he is an awful liberal.
00:13:20 But this all seems kind of bad for our democracy. Here is another Globe and Mail article. Ironically,
00:13:27 they're reporting on this completely straight, despite the fact that they should know better
00:13:32 than anybody that this is not exactly an up-and-up race. The headline here reads,
00:13:37 Now, obviously, this was written before he ended up challenging or stating that he will be challenging the results usually you have within, like, 48 to 72 hours to do so, and he's doing that right now.
00:13:54 and it says right here
00:13:56 On Saturday, Liberal members in the East Toronto
00:13:59 riding chose businessman
00:14:00 Ansel Hafez
00:14:04 as their next provincial candidate
00:14:05 in the yet-to-be-announced election
00:14:06 beating Erskine Smith in a close contest
00:14:09 The nomination was seen as a critical step
00:14:11 in Mr. Erskine Smith's plan to run for leader
00:14:13 of the Ontario Liberal Party
00:14:15 He's currently a federal MP for the neighbouring riding
00:14:17 of Beaches, East York
00:14:18 Now, that is kind of one of the key
00:14:21 things in all this
00:14:22 he's planning on running to be the next Ontario Liberal Party leader. But it seems like the
00:14:27 insiders of the party don't like him, but they can't tell him to just leave, so they have to
00:14:32 basically try and humiliate him in this nomination to prevent him from having, I guess, the credibility
00:14:38 to run for leader, because it seems like the insiders of the Ontario Liberal Party instead
00:14:44 want former MP and a massively corrupt liberal, Navdeep Baines, as the new Ontario Liberal Party
00:14:52 leader. Which, again, I don't like any of these people, but if you're actually wanting to win the
00:14:57 next election, if you're the Liberal Party, you should probably be picking Nate Erskine Smith,
00:15:02 not Navdeep Baines, who was too corrupt for even Justin Trudeau's Liberal Party, and I believe just
00:15:08 had to resign or not run again, because there were crazy stories of him having hundreds of
00:15:13 thousands of dollars in gambling debt that somehow disappeared when it became a problem
00:15:19 you know but apparently this is the path the ontario liberal party wants to go
00:15:24 and here we have uh the how do we have the the leader of the ontario liberals it doesn't really
00:15:32 matter but the the current interim leader basically sort of tutted away all the problems in the
00:15:37 nomination and just says oh we run fairly fair races we stand by the results like you can't
00:15:43 stand by the results pre you know challenge you actually have to wait to hear what the challenge
00:15:48 is i just want to play again what nate erskine smith's words were at the time when the nomination
00:15:54 had ended and a lot of people were asking him if he was going to challenge the results he kind of
00:15:59 lays out some of the issues his team had already noticed at the time lots of stories about what's
00:16:04 happened inside but i've got i gotta debrief i i like it wouldn't be fair for me to jump off the
00:16:10 up like I really have to talk to the team in detail to get advice from the
00:16:13 team as to what they saw happen in there. I've spoken to a few scrutineers
00:16:16 already who said they've never seen anything like it and it's unreal what
00:16:19 happened in there so I need to I need to I need to I need to do a full
00:16:25 debrief for the team. I mean I wasn't in the room I was shaking hands and
00:16:31 they said they've never seen anything like it there were at one table it was
00:16:38 50% of the people that had ID issues saying they'd lost driver's license.
00:16:42 They just moved in the area.
00:16:43 So, look, I don't know.
00:16:44 It's unfair for me to specifically speculate.
00:16:47 I got no idea.
00:16:48 I got to talk to the team, do a full debrief with the team as to what comes next in terms of, you know, it was obviously very close.
00:16:53 And we'll see.
00:16:54 I don't know.
00:16:54 How close was it?
00:16:56 We heard 20 votes.
00:16:57 Yeah, shy of that.
00:16:58 Just shy.
00:16:58 19?
00:16:59 19.
00:16:59 19.
00:17:00 Are you concerned about the final results?
00:17:02 Like, you don't think this is necessarily the legitimate result if there's a combination?
00:17:05 I would like to hear from every single person that was in that room on our team
00:17:10 to understand what took place and what their feeling is
00:17:15 and if there is a legitimate reason to challenge.
00:17:17 Obviously, given everything we've seen in the race to date
00:17:20 and some frustrations along the way with disallowing members
00:17:23 and then we see screw nears in that room articulate concerns,
00:17:29 honestly, I have to do a full debrief with them before I decide next steps.
00:17:34 So the truth is, again, in this race, like Nate Erskine-Smith or not, considering, again, Hafiz says he only lost a few memberships when the party did the giant purge, if these members were allowed in, because I really doubt Hafiz's people were doing the two-factor authentication if they can't even speak the English language and they don't have IDs, I think it's pretty safe to say, considering how close it was on a second or third ballot,
00:18:01 But probably Nate Erskine-Smith wins easily on first ballot.
00:18:06 But because the powers that be do not want him to win,
00:18:09 this is why we have this whole thing resulting in this clown shoes result
00:18:14 where some random Domino Pizza franchise owner
00:18:18 speaking on panels with people with sexual assault histories,
00:18:22 and he has his own weird things he's posted on his old Facebook back in the day,
00:18:25 still need to verify some of that.
00:18:26 he's now the winner because Mark Carney doesn't want him to actually go and be an Ontario Liberal
00:18:33 MPP, and the Ontario Liberal Party doesn't want him to run for their leadership. Now, this is where
00:18:40 the drama hits Mark Carney, the Federal Liberals, and the Ontario Liberals. The problem is, is that
00:18:46 if Nate Erskine-Smith is mistreated, what are the actual odds he's going to stick around with Mark
00:18:54 Carney, who's not going to stand up for his MP trying to get into Ontario Liberal politics,
00:19:00 is going to say nothing, make no phone calls about the fact that this happened. I think that they are
00:19:05 now between a rock and hard place. We're in a bit of a Mexican standoff here, because Erskine Smith,
00:19:12 if he sues or does something like that, it could end up destroying the brand of the Ontario Liberal 0.99
00:19:16 Party, as right when they're actually starting to do better in the polls, suddenly they have a giant
00:19:22 internal party corruption scandal led by one of the people who's actually fairly popular with the
00:19:28 grassroots of that party if there is such a thing as liberal grassroots. And then, but the thing is
00:19:33 that because Mark Carney wants Nate Erskine-Smith to stick around to help hold up his majority,
00:19:40 it may end up slipping through his fingers even more. Yes, he did endorse Nate, but him and Nate
00:19:46 hate each other. It's probably because Nate threatened to do something if Mark Carney did
00:19:51 not endorse him because we went over that that endorsement video. It was the most awkward thing
00:19:56 on the planet. Erskine Smith had his hands in his pockets the entire time. Carney barely looked at
00:20:01 him, kind of gestured towards him, never said his name, never endorsed him by name. It was super
00:20:07 weird. But if Erskine Smith feels hard done or wrong-footed, what stops him from, one, he could
00:20:14 potentially still, if he does not win a challenge to this, he could still run as an independent and
00:20:19 potentially win or run for another party provincially and still win, or if he feels
00:20:24 too resentful about having to serve with Mark Carney, who didn't actually do anything to help
00:20:29 him and has been basically undermining him ever since he became prime minister. What stopped him
00:20:33 from joining Avi Lewis and the NDP, as Erskine Smith was always more of an orange-coded liberal
00:20:40 MP overall. He's a very, you know, anti-corporate Palestinian activist type of an MP, and so he
00:20:48 might fit in very well with Avi Lewis these days. If you haven't been keeping track, when Mark Carney
00:20:53 first became Prime Minister, he made Nate Erskine-Smith the Housing Minister for about two
00:20:59 months. And then after the April election, he then made Gregory Robertson. He made him the
00:21:11 Housing Minister, screwed over Erskine-Smith, who only ran for re-election again under the promise
00:21:16 of being the housing minister. And since then, he's been backbiting Carney, attacking him for
00:21:22 his dealing with the Aircanda flight attendant strike, attacking him for the budget, attacking
00:21:28 him for many other things that he perceives that he's doing wrong. And so what love is really lost
00:21:34 between these two anymore if he doesn't get to go away quietly? If he doesn't, there's nothing
00:21:40 really left for, I guess, NES in federal politics. So why doesn't he just go and join a different
00:21:45 party and help make Mark Carney really hurt on this one, or at least threaten to do so if Mark
00:21:51 Carney doesn't tell the Ontario Liberal Party to reverse the fraudulent election and let Nate
00:21:57 Ersteinsmith through. So this, as time goes on, is going to continue being a very interesting story.
00:22:05 It could result in a big court case, and the by-election is going to be an absolute bloodbath.
00:22:10 By the way, a fizz is probably going to lose. A fizz is not a popular general election candidate.
00:22:15 Again, he had to cheat to win a nomination. This is actually, as we said before, Dolly Begum's riding. It was an NDP riding. The NDP is not like the federal NDP. Ontario NDP has some muscle. They can win this riding again. If you run Hafiz, you're going to lose. 0.90
00:22:31 Now, again, I don't have a dog in this fight. I would tell everyone in that riding to vote for the new blue party of Ontario because the PCs suck. 0.99
00:22:39 But right now, the Ontario Liberals are so resentful. They hate Nader Skynesna so much, probably because he's not really one of the insider type class. 0.95
00:22:47 He wants to probably get rid of them. They will now run a candidate very unlikely to win the riding compared to NES simply because they don't like NES.
00:22:58 This is the problem with internal politics everywhere. So often, insiders pick friends or just completely inoffensive rule followers as their candidates, and not kind of more grassroots, maverick, outspoken individuals who the base actually likes.
00:23:15 This is the problem with the federal conservative party in the last election. So many boring, who gives a crap kind of candidates selected in so many ridings, and it turns out nobody really wanted to show up and vote for them.
00:23:26 Now, people always say Canadians vote for parties. They don't really vote for candidates, although then liberals will say the opposite when they're justifying people crossing the floor. But never you mind. People always say, well, people always vote for parties more than they vote for candidates. 0.97
00:23:39 Like, well, some people vote for candidates. And the old adage goes, a good candidate is worth 5% of the vote, which is nothing to sneeze at in tight races. And guess what? A bad candidate by the same logic is worth negative 5%. And I think the federal conservatives could have won Mississauga, Brampton, and so many other areas of the country if they ran good candidates.
00:24:03 stop running dead-on-arrival
00:24:05 red Tories, random 0.85
00:24:07 corrupt community representatives 0.98
00:24:09 who are really just a bunch of 0.99
00:24:11 Kalistanis who basically presented themselves
00:24:13 as super popular when nobody actually 1.00
00:24:15 likes them locally. Stop picking
00:24:17 those people. Pick people
00:24:19 who won a nomination fair and square, who
00:24:21 know how to hit the doors, who have good
00:24:23 bold policy platforms, because
00:24:25 conservatives can actually take a little
00:24:27 bit of a lesson away from
00:24:29 Nate Erskine-Smith.
00:24:31 I don't like him, but he actually
00:24:33 is really good at connecting with voters on a one-to-one level. The man runs a podcast while
00:24:38 he's sitting as a liberal MP. I think his policies are ridiculous. He's just some obnoxious vegan in 0.99
00:24:45 my mind, but he's an obnoxious vegan who connects with the other obnoxious vegans out there who 0.98
00:24:50 will vote for him. He's very good at getting his name out there. More conservatives have to learn 0.95
00:24:54 how to do that. I work for Dallas Brody in British Columbia in the 1BC party. She is very good at
00:24:59 that. She is very good at getting out front of people, being herself, being organic, and that's 0.99
00:25:04 why the 1BC party in some polls is now at 11%, because people like that straightforward style.
00:25:10 Erskine Smith has it. Don't like his politics, but he's straightforward. People do not like
00:25:15 vote people like Hafez. People do not like random, again, candidates who got appointed,
00:25:22 who are just like a random Calistanis, or like just dudes who can barely speak the English
00:25:27 language running for parties because, well, it's a good candidate who can get the community on his
00:25:33 side. No, they can't. We've seen this over and over again. The people in Brampton do not just
00:25:38 want some random egotist as their candidate. Well, he's Indian, so the Indian people in the area will 0.97
00:25:45 vote for him. No, they won't. Guess what? Indian people also don't like crappy candidates. But 0.97
00:25:50 anyways, with all that being said, of course, if you live in the Yorkton, Melville riding in
00:25:55 Saskatchewan, I'm just going to give you another reminder. Make sure to buy a membership for this
00:26:00 riding. It's an extremely conservative riding. That means that you buying a membership is helping
00:26:05 guide how your representative is actually going to be in government. It's not just about getting
00:26:10 rid of a liberal. This is a conservative, conservative riding. Vote for the most
00:26:15 conservative person. I will have a couple of recommendations in the description below. But
00:26:19 if you live in that area, buy a membership. I know most of you do not live there,
00:26:23 but this is a riding where a few memberships here and there will make a big difference on who ends
00:26:29 up winning the area. Anyways, with all that being said, thank you guys for watching and I'll see you
00:26:35 all next time.