The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Liberals FAILURES catch up with them - Carney Flees overseas again!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.

00:00:06.160 You can tell whenever Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Liberals are not doing very well on domestic issues,

00:00:13.120 because suddenly Carney jets off for another international tour to schmooze with world leaders, accomplishing exactly nothing.

00:00:22.340 So suddenly, Mark Carney, in the middle of mediocre job numbers coming out, the U.S. trade situation continuing to decline, and his embarrassing spring economic update, he is now in Armenia. Isn't that fantastic, everyone?

00:00:37.240 He says right here,

00:00:39.200 I don't want to be rude to Armenia or anything.

00:00:59.340 That part of the world contains one of my favorite countries, Georgia.

00:01:03.180 But canned Armenia relations don't matter. Have you ever sat up just sweating at night, wondering how Canadian-Armenian relations are developing? Have you ever thought about Canadian-Tajikistan relations, Canadian-Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan relations?

00:01:25.760 I haven't either, surprisingly. I know this is like one of the big issues in Canadian politics

00:01:31.920 right now, but we're just out of the loop. Again, Carney is going to this stupid meeting of EU 0.99

00:01:38.640 countries, for some reason hosted in Armenia, because the domestic front sucks. Yes, he is 1.00

00:01:46.680 polling in the lead of Pierre Polyev. Yes, his approval numbers are still good. But approval

00:01:51.480 numbers and polls only stay in the positive when you're actually doing good work and he's not and

00:01:57.640 so to ease off some of the pressure so it doesn't start hurting his polling too much he is suddenly

00:02:02.660 just doing nonsense overseas once again and so we have him here meeting with vladimir zelensky the

00:02:10.320 president of ukraine where he's talking about giving him another 270 70 million dollars of

00:02:15.200 military support now i'm going to be very honest i don't care that much about ukraine one way or

00:02:20.460 another. I don't like Russia having more power in the world. So I'm happy to have Ukraine not 0.82

00:02:24.860 lose to the Russians. How about we have a healthier economy so we can actually give money to the 0.64

00:02:31.640 Ukrainians? How about that? We also gave them another $2 billion not that long ago. And I don't 0.98

00:02:38.260 feel like we're actually doing a good enough check on how they're spending the money. They've had a

00:02:42.660 bunch of corruption scandals recently of money being diverted from things being sent in from

00:02:48.300 overseas to accounts related to members of the government and companies that they run now i'm

00:02:54.300 not saying that this is the majority of the money obviously it's going to be a small fraction of it

00:02:57.980 but come on if we're not even able to if we can't even barely afford to contribute anything can we

00:03:03.600 at least make sure that 100 of the money is going towards something useful and who did he consult

00:03:08.720 on giving another 270 million out of nowhere by the way again no insults ukraine but can their

00:03:14.160 president wear a suit for once like he's always acting like he's in a bomb shelter and it's

00:03:18.160 getting a little bit annoying and i'm saying this as someone who is very hawkish on foreign policy

00:03:22.420 and very much not pro-russia but it's just kind of annoying but we have here mark carney talking to

00:03:29.780 european you know eu representatives because i guess he wants canada to join the eu and i'm not

00:03:36.540 trying to be exaggerate when i say that he very clearly wants it and he's here meeting with

00:03:40.440 Pedro Sanchez, the awful socialist prime minister or premier of Spain. We have him here talking with

00:03:48.020 the prime minister, the president of France, Emmanuel Macron. I would love to know what

00:03:55.140 we're getting out of any of this other than just photo ops for the prime minister. Nothing is what

00:04:00.580 I would assume. I really liked this post. I appreciate it from J.J. McCullough, fellow

00:04:05.500 YouTuber far more popular than I. He was reacting to this post by the foreign affairs

00:04:11.760 sort of like secretary for the European Union. Here she says, Europe is not just about geography,

00:04:18.560 it's also about the values and principles we share. That's why we are glad to welcome Canada

00:04:23.680 at the European political community meeting today to discuss common issues. I'm sorry,

00:04:29.820 No, Canada's not European.

00:04:32.740 We are not European, obviously, in geography.

00:04:35.920 We are not European in values.

00:04:38.180 In fact, I would say every way that Canada is bad right now

00:04:41.700 is tied to people like Trudeau and Carney wanting us to emulate Europe more.

00:04:46.960 But the base level Canadian is not a European.

00:04:49.880 They are a Canadian.

00:04:51.240 But Carney has this strange need, bordering on a fetish at this point,

00:04:56.460 to make Canada like part of the EU, at least spiritually.

00:05:01.160 J.J. McCullough reacted to this and said,

00:05:03.620 Canada is utterly, objectively not part of Europe.

00:05:07.540 And I resent this bizarre project by Carney

00:05:09.920 and apparently the Europeans too now

00:05:11.900 to try and convince us that we are.

00:05:14.600 Absolutely, we are not European.

00:05:17.300 This is embarrassing.

00:05:18.180 And again, on the domestic front,

00:05:20.660 the policy that Carney has pushed forward

00:05:23.240 has been embarrassing.

00:05:25.100 This guy's a Goldman Sachs man.

00:05:27.080 This guy used to be the governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England. 0.96

00:05:30.640 Well, I can believe the Bank of England part because he was trash as the governor of the Bank of England.

00:05:35.000 But has any business liberals still planning on voting for the liberals asked themselves, 0.50

00:05:39.360 when is he going to stop giving us exactly the same policy that Justin Trudeau was giving us that we hated?

00:05:45.500 And they should realize he was the economic advisor to Trudeau for five years. 0.98

00:05:50.160 if you are shocked that he sucks, I don't know what to do for you. You are making the man who 0.98

00:05:58.220 sucked at advising on Trudeau's economy the prime minister and then being all surprise Pikachu that 0.97

00:06:04.660 he still sucks at the job. But whatever, some people cannot be helped. Now I need to take you 0.97

00:06:10.620 guys to question period today. The liberals are getting a bit antsy. They're getting a bit

00:06:15.740 uncomfortable. Now, that doesn't mean that I think that the conservatives are doing an amazing job

00:06:21.620 arguing against the liberals. I think there's always a room for improvement. They need to be

00:06:25.180 running on bolder policy. They need an across-the-board tax. They need to stop kind of

00:06:29.860 soft-shoeing around the issues and only tackling the comfortable ones. I think they've done a very

00:06:35.460 good job intensifying their position on U.S. trade, of making sure to undermine Carney in a good way

00:06:41.360 on that issue, not like undermining him and being trader in Canada, but like undermining

00:06:45.880 Carney's kind of snotty, above it all kind of stance on U.S. trade.

00:06:50.600 Polyev has been pushing on him to get a deal done, be transparent about where the deal

00:06:54.360 is at.

00:06:55.100 He's been suggesting things to Carney that he could do, and Carney has been rejecting 0.95

00:06:58.580 all of it, looking really, really pathetic in doing so.

00:07:02.780 And I think that Polyev and the Conservatives just need to expand that now to other issues 0.53

00:07:06.500 on taxes, run on a big across the board tax cut.

00:07:10.000 Don't just prices right them and run on a slightly bigger tax cut. 0.81

00:07:13.940 That does not work when it comes to electoral politics.

00:07:17.240 If they're not running on a big tax cut, you run on a massive one.

00:07:20.160 You don't just run on a slightly bigger one.

00:07:21.780 But that's my rant for today.

00:07:23.500 Let's get into QP where the liberals are not looking so hot when it comes to trying to defend their record right now.

00:07:31.240 The prime minister promised to spend less, but then he spent $35 billion more in the last fiscal update alone.

00:07:37.980 He promised to lower the debt.

00:07:39.340 Instead, the deficits doubled from just one year ago, and he promised fiscal brilliance.

00:07:45.520 But the not-even-so-conservative Globe and Mail calls that an inversion of reality.

00:07:50.240 Once an expensive Liberal, always an expensive Liberal.

00:07:53.040 This year, Canadian families will write a check for $3,400 just to cover the interest on the Liberal debt.

00:07:59.720 Why won't the Prime Minister stop forcing Canadians to pay the credit card bill and just allow them to get by?

00:08:05.200 Now, you could say that that wasn't a particularly surprising question to ask

00:08:10.500 in the sense it wasn't like, oh, wow, I didn't think about that really cutting attack.

00:08:15.480 The purpose of an attack is always to throw a hand grenade to your opponent

00:08:19.900 that they do not know how to handle.

00:08:21.920 And for some reason, the Liberals put up Wayne Long as their representative

00:08:26.500 against Melissa Lansman.

00:08:28.620 The inevitable Secretary of State for Financial Institutions.

00:08:32.140 Mr. Speaker, Canada's new government is committed to build a strong, resilient, and independent economy.

00:08:39.560 Despite what we hear opposite, our economy is strong.

00:08:43.760 The IMF predicts our economy to be one of the most resilient, fastest growing in the G7.

00:08:49.060 We're going to continue to build the economy.

00:08:51.680 A spring economic update, invest $6 billion in the trades, invest in the Sovereign Wealth Fund.

00:08:58.060 mr speaker on this side you're continuing to build a strong economy that side can continue

00:09:03.020 with the rhymes and rhetoric thank you mr speaker he's right there again i hope he is such an

00:09:09.100 awkward performer whenever he gets up there he's awkward and this is where he pushes his like chin

00:09:13.820 down and starts pointing a lot and it like makes his head look like really big as he's doing it

00:09:18.140 but he's like they're looking sweaty and desperate pointing at most like those members over there all

00:09:23.100 All they have is rhymes and like naysaying or whatever he was trying to get through there.

00:09:29.460 And he brings up the Sovereign Wealth Fund because the Globe and Mail doesn't even like the Sovereign Wealth Fund.

00:09:34.860 The Globe and Mail loves the Liberal Party, but even they don't like the Sovereign Wealth Fund.

00:09:41.040 So we have this opinion piece from Robin Urbach, and this is on the heels of actually multiple opinion pieces and analysis articles

00:09:49.240 where the Globe and Mail is kind of looking at Carney being like,

00:09:52.580 I thought you were going to be an economic wizard,

00:09:54.560 and it's been a year, and we're really not seeing it.

00:09:58.200 And so in this article, though, Robin Urbach here says,

00:10:02.600 quoting Carney at the start here, quote,

00:10:04.660 In a crisis, fortune favors the bold, Prime Minister Carney said

00:10:08.140 in a fireside chat video posted online earlier this month.

00:10:11.500 The Prime Minister laid out the foundation for his Canada Strong Plan,

00:10:14.980 which he promised would be transformative, comprehensive, and ambitious.

00:10:17.940 And he probably said catalyzing in there a dozen times as well.

00:10:21.780 But going on, it says,

00:10:22.920 But if fortune indeed favors the bold, as Mr. Carney said, the forces of the universe will simply breeze past Canada,

00:10:29.160 since there was nothing particularly bold about the plan laid out by the government in its economic update tabled earlier this week.

00:10:36.460 Canada's plan to deal with the converging crisis of U.S. economic aggression or sputtering productivity and growth

00:10:42.420 and the structural deficit that will extend through the rest of the decade

00:10:45.540 has essentially been for the government to create new institutions, build Canada homes,

00:10:50.300 the major projects office, a sovereign wealth fund to manage the excess wealth we don't actually have,

00:10:55.760 and so on. Perhaps these incentives will bear the results in years or decades in time,

00:11:01.480 but Canada needs transformative change now, and indeed a true Canada strong plan would marry

00:11:06.700 ambitious policy reforms with the new institutional changes that Mr. Carney is promising for later.

00:11:12.620 and so she goes into what he should be doing but when the Globe and Mail is starting to tell Carney

00:11:17.960 what he should be doing they're admitting he doesn't know what he's doing if opinion writers

00:11:23.000 at the Globe and Mail are basically starting to reach over his shoulder and say how about

00:11:27.000 Carney you do this how about you you don't do this and you try this instead it's because he

00:11:32.980 doesn't know what he's doing at all and the liberals reaction to getting very basic questions

00:11:37.180 from the conservatives has been quite telling that they actually can't point to hey look jobs

00:11:42.700 are up this much debt is down this much we have grown the economy this much they keep looking to

00:11:48.540 projections way undershooting the projections or overshooting it when it comes to debt and then

00:11:54.520 basically next year they come back and be like don't worry we have projected an even more

00:11:58.900 unrealistic goal that we're never going to reach but now let's get back to melissa lanceman question

00:12:03.640 period. Member for Thornhill. Sovereign debt fund. The Prime Minister actually told Canadians that he

00:12:10.160 was the guy that you hired in a crisis and then spent double what the last guy spent. Just five

00:12:15.300 years from now, the Liberal credit card bill will reach a trillion dollars. All that spending has

00:12:21.220 brought us the highest grocery prices, the worst housing prices and a two to two dollar a litre

00:12:26.240 gasoline while everybody falls behind. The crisis guy is racking up more debt and promising somehow

00:12:32.720 it's going to be different this time when are they finally going to stop the credit card craziness

00:12:37.660 and so Canadians can afford to live this is the one thing I wish conservatives would do never use

00:12:44.680 alliteration it only ever comes off more I would say adolescent to be like credit card craziness

00:12:51.820 I don't like when people do alliterations never do that just be like hey guys when's the when are

00:12:57.120 we ever going to get to a balanced budget or have you fully given up on that ask them something like

00:13:01.760 that hey the average canadian is having their food costs go up by this many dollars per year

00:13:07.460 why don't you cut their tax so they can pay for it like you actually have to ask them a question

00:13:11.320 and so it's still a fine question this is just me being a bit of a nitpicker always ask them a very

00:13:15.920 clear yes or no when are you guys going to implement this or that and that requires the

00:13:20.940 conservatives have a very very bold policy platform where they can then say hey we have this idea when

00:13:26.440 are you guys going to do something like that and have the liberals constantly just say no we're

00:13:30.420 not going to cut people's taxes 20% across the board. No, we're not going to completely eliminate

00:13:35.820 this or that program. And the conservatives should run against programs. Never get cold feet just

00:13:40.540 because the liberals are going to say, you don't want to feed hungry kids. You want to get rid of

00:13:44.980 the school food program. Yes, we do. Because you don't need it if you just cut people's taxes.

00:13:50.120 That's how the conservatives should run the next campaign. We are going to cut away all of the

00:13:55.220 stupid programs and replace it with just giving your money back to you and apologizing 0.99

00:13:59.920 so apparently they realized that wayne long was not equipped to answer these questions so they 0.99

00:14:11.520 have evan solomon uh inexplicably wearing i don't even know what the heck this thing is

00:14:18.140 so he's wearing we need to get a zoom in shot on this ensemble right here what is this ensemble

00:14:25.220 so i got the got the smart watch on oh you need the smart watch he is the ai minister after all

00:14:31.300 so he's got this bluish suit he has this blue suit jacket on white shirt kind of you know

00:14:38.080 shiny navy tie actually kind of looks like he's dressed with by pure poly of a little bit until

00:14:44.040 you get to the weird quarter zip

00:14:46.300 with the thing flayed out

00:14:48.340 like he's some

00:14:49.020 chameleon

00:14:52.540 right here. I don't even know

00:14:54.360 what the heck this is.

00:14:57.000 He looks like 0.96

00:14:58.300 a navy dressed up iguana

00:15:00.080 with all the random collars

00:15:02.280 pointing out in the

00:15:03.460 vest. What the heck is that?

00:15:06.460 I'm sorry, Evan Solomon

00:15:07.820 has robbed me of my

00:15:10.400 senses for just a second there.

00:15:12.100 with this horrible outfit you know this is my best argument against why people shouldn't vote

00:15:17.820 for evan solomon look at this thing my goodness you have credit we have the best credit rating

00:15:22.600 in the world wages have grown twice as fast as inflation what would what would this or the

00:15:29.240 opposition cut no no wages have not grown twice as much as inflation no the average canadian has

00:15:36.580 the average quote-unquote average Canadian is making more since like the last over the last

00:15:42.120 two years since Mark Carney came in the average Canadian has made two times as much as inflation

00:15:47.940 but that's not actually that's to the average the median has technically gone up the average

00:15:53.400 has technically gone up because we got a bunch of we got rid of a bunch of lower wage TFWs

00:15:57.700 and some other people at the bottom end of the economy lost their jobs so now those who are

00:16:02.580 employed, the median and average has gone up, not because the actually people are making more

00:16:07.520 money. If you're making 30 bucks a year at your office job, or sorry, 30 bucks an hour at your

00:16:13.300 office job when Mark Carney started as prime minister, you didn't have your wages go up

00:16:20.080 twice as fast as inflation. You didn't go to like $32. You've not budged an inch. But your $30

00:16:26.360 is relatively higher

00:16:28.860 because we got rid of a bunch of low-end

00:16:31.040 employees,

00:16:32.220 a bunch of minimum wage people.

00:16:34.600 So now the average is

00:16:35.940 higher because there's fewer minimum wage people

00:16:38.340 around. It's maddening.

00:16:40.080 Whenever they try and throw that

00:16:41.960 fake statistic across

00:16:44.240 the plate, it's not true.

00:16:46.740 And the Conservatives should do a big 1.00

00:16:48.220 explainer on how they basically think you're an idiot 1.00

00:16:50.440 by putting something like that 1.00

00:16:52.320 out. Here, Paul, if you get a

00:16:54.260 little wooden pointy stick and a whiteboard,

00:16:56.360 and explain why that is a fake statistic people have people's wages have not gone up in fact we

00:17:03.640 literally had 86 000 people lose their jobs between january and february and then 16 000

00:17:09.800 gain their jobs back in march the job numbers have been terrible awful but because people have been

00:17:16.680 losing their jobs those who have been retaining their jobs are usually on the higher end of the

00:17:21.480 income bracket, which means the average worker is now making more. Imagine it this way. If we

00:17:28.140 executed everyone who doesn't make a million dollars a year, wow, the average worker now

00:17:32.480 makes a million dollars a year. That's effectively what they're doing here.

00:17:38.520 What would they cut? For example, would they cut? See, they're doing exactly what I think they're

00:17:43.240 going to do. As soon as you start criticizing them for their spending, they say, what are they

00:17:46.540 going to cut? And I challenge the conservatives. Say, we're going to cut this, that, and the other

00:17:50.580 thing name all the programs school food program could be gotten rid of because we're going to cut 0.98

00:17:54.620 people's taxes they won't need it we're going to get rid of the stupid new home program we're going 0.87

00:17:58.620 to get rid of the major projects office we're going to get rid of this department that department 0.99

00:18:04.080 there are so many stupid environmental initiatives they could cut foreign aid spending that they could 0.97

00:18:09.540 cut it's easy never run away from it never mince words the conservatives should just come right 1.00

00:18:15.020 back at them and say you guys are wasting five billion dollars a year on this cut it right now

00:18:19.460 why won't you do it that's what they need to do this are the opposition cut what would they cut

00:18:25.020 for example would they cut support for our workers just today mr speaker we have invested a billion

00:18:33.000 dollars to support the steel the aluminum the copper industries hit by a trade war that they

00:18:40.380 deny another 500 million dollars for good jobs like at bowrock where they're building with steel

00:18:46.420 would these guys cut support for those industries ask them mr speaker

00:18:51.400 it's so do you know why they're giving a bunch of money to steel and aluminum because trump is

00:18:59.120 going to those companies directly and saying hey i will cut your terror i will just give i want to

00:19:04.460 apply tariffs to your company if you agree to make your next expansion into let's say michigan

00:19:10.640 Minnesota, Ohio, Idaho, wherever they do steel manufacturing, steel, you know, I don't know,

00:19:17.900 wherever you do, because I know there's a difference between where you mine and then

00:19:20.740 where you actually like process all the steel process, wherever they put it, New York state,

00:19:25.240 I don't know, Delaware, Vermont, Rhode Island, who knows? If you move your next steel plant to the

00:19:30.440 U.S., you won't apply tariffs to your company. So now the liberals are trying to bribe Canadian

00:19:34.760 companies to not take the offer that Trump is giving them. And they frankly would be kind of

00:19:39.200 foolish not to take the offer. Because it's not like Carney and the liberals are coming to rescue 0.89

00:19:42.580 them. They're just going to throw some money that will eventually all be burned up, paying for the

00:19:46.880 tariff costs, and then they'll be needing more money. Whereas you can just get the tariffs taken

00:19:51.400 away if you just say, sure, I will build a new steel processing plant in Massachusetts.

00:19:58.680 Mr. Speaker, despite the illusions with this prime minister, it's more cost, more blocking

00:20:03.840 our resources more of the same because he's just another liberal this prime minister said a pipeline

00:20:09.760 was more probable than possible but there's no proponent there's no start date no completion date

00:20:16.000 no route there's no plan if the prime minister wants canadians to believe he's not just another

00:20:21.120 liberal will the government tell us on what date will construction start on this new pipeline just

00:20:27.280 Mr. Speaker, my colleague in charge of natural resources will be able to also answer that question.

00:20:37.620 What I can add to that is that the Conservatives and all their questions always forget something that all Canadians know, which is we're in a trade war.

00:20:46.720 Oh, my God. No, no, no. I'm cutting off. I am cutting off Miss Pedantic right here.

00:20:52.240 I'm sorry no you can't you can't get a yes or no question not yes or no but you can't get like a

00:20:57.780 very specific question and maybe it's a little too specific you can never exactly say with

00:21:03.040 certainty when the project's going to start but they you can push them on the fact that they're

00:21:07.320 basically pretending they're going to build a pipeline with no actual plan to do it and it's

00:21:11.800 because there's they will not get a proponent because they refuse to get all the dumb regulations

00:21:15.840 out of the way that make proponent you know scares away any possible proponent you can't just like

00:21:20.240 counter that question asked by Tim Upple, who's definitely not one of my favorite conservative

00:21:25.220 MPs. Fine question. And then you can't be like, you know, there's a trade war going on.

00:21:30.220 Mr. Speaker, my conservative colleagues have forgotten that there's a trade war going on.

00:21:35.160 You know, there's trade and there's a war going on in the middle of it. Mr. Speaker,

00:21:39.680 I feel like I'm starting to do like a Norm Macdonald impression. But I need to now take

00:21:44.960 you guys to one of the truly obnoxious things that happened last friday uh where it was ryan

00:21:51.460 turnbull uh who always reminds me of this character from a kids show i think uh do i have the photo

00:21:58.180 right here yeah he reminds me i've never watched the show i just know of it because it's kind of

00:22:02.440 a meme online he reminds me of the kids show character robbie rotten here from the show lazy

00:22:07.400 town just it's just the hair it's just the spiky hair and slightly crescent shaped face

00:22:12.520 but he says right here it can't it can't be tolerated any longer the conservatives lecture

00:22:18.940 our government about hungry kids but repeatedly voted against a national school food program

00:22:23.500 we are investing 200 million per year to feed 400,000 kids at school while the conservative

00:22:29.800 the Canada child benefit lower child care fees but hundreds of dollars per month into families

00:22:34.840 pockets that's real help not cheap talk and I responded to this because I found it so obnoxious

00:22:40.520 with this liberals ruin economy families struggle to put food on the table liberals throw money at

00:22:47.820 the problem conservatives how about we lower taxes and regulations hurting the economy and

00:22:52.820 cut government spending increasing inflation and the liberals wow it's like you don't you want

00:22:57.560 children to go hungry i find so much all this so tiring that every time the liberals end up breaking

00:23:05.480 the economy it then gives them the opportunity to pass a program to try and partially remedy

00:23:10.840 all the pain that they've caused and if the conservatives ever come up and say how about

00:23:14.900 we just you know deregulate and cut taxes they're like oh my goodness it's almost like you don't

00:23:18.900 want to help steel workers or hungry kids it's like a south park episode you just keep like you

00:23:24.900 know break people's knees and then you have like the we have a program to give painkillers to the

00:23:29.700 people that we broke the knees of and then we we suggest maybe we should stop the breaking people's

00:23:33.940 program they're like oh my goodness it's like you don't want to remedy people's pain with our

00:23:37.240 painkiller program i guess so guys i guess so i guess i want hungry kids to go hungry oh my goodness

00:23:44.460 anyways with all that being said thank you guys for watching this episode of the national

00:23:49.340 telegraph make sure to leave a like on the video if you like the channel subscribe if you're not

00:23:54.200 yet a subscriber to the channel and then consider hitting the join button becoming a member of the

00:23:59.180 channel if you want to make me less reliant on the youtube algorithm and the channel more

00:24:02.780 sustainable for me. I thank everyone else who has already joined the program. It really does help

00:24:07.740 month to month to make this a viable sort of primary for me while I do other political stuff

00:24:13.500 for peanuts. And I do that intentionally. By doing the channel this way, I can kind of do whatever I

00:24:18.840 want for political initiatives. So this fall, I'm probably going to get more involved with both

00:24:23.540 British Columbia and Ontario municipal elections because those are kind of happening around the

00:24:28.440 same time so i'm going to try and get a little bit involved and kind of into the weeds on who's

00:24:33.700 running for mayor and council in places like vancouver surrey you know nanaimo places like

00:24:39.460 that toronto london let's see what we can get done here because my goodness all municipalities

00:24:45.840 always tend to have the most left-wing people involved in them conservatives need to show up

00:24:50.560 for municipal elections if you think it's confusing tough toenails you're gonna have to figure out

00:24:55.700 who's the actual conservative, I find it annoying whenever people are like, I don't know who to

00:24:59.420 vote for, so I'm not going to vote. It's like, Google, Google it, Google it, but I will be your

00:25:04.640 Google in this case and find the best slates of candidates or the best mayoral candidates.

00:25:09.460 Even if they're not good, let's at least make an improvement. And in Toronto, that might be Brad

00:25:14.280 Bradford. Now that doesn't inspire me. Maybe I can like bully him into taking more conservative

00:25:19.760 positions. But if it's better than Olivia Chow, maybe Brad Bradford's the guy. Maybe. I don't

00:25:27.140 know. Anyways, with all that being said, thank you guys for watching and I'll see you all next time.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - May 04, 2026

Liberals FAILURES catch up with them - Carney Flees overseas again!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript