The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - February 18, 2025


Mark Carney's radical statements are coming back to HAUNT him!


Episode Stats


Length

16 minutes

Words per minute

169.82027

Word count

2,866

Sentence count

142

Harmful content

Misogyny

10

sentences flagged

Hate speech

3

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Wyatt Claypool discusses how out of touch Mark Carney is with the average Canadian and how he should have been able to shut his mouth for a second and not say a stupid thing. He also talks about why he should be fired if he s chosen as the next Liberal Party Leader.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I know that Mark Carney is one of the worst politicians in Canadian
00:00:06.860 history, because if he wasn't one of the worst, he wouldn't be currently in a close leadership
00:00:12.300 battle with one of the other worst politicians in Canadian history, Chrystia Freeland. When this 0.99
00:00:18.580 Liberal Party leadership race first kicked off to find a replacement for Justin Trudeau,
00:00:23.320 it was slated as being a Mark Carney coronation. Mark Carney has superior resources, money,
00:00:30.540 and endorsements to Chrystia Freeland, but the problem is that he also is the candidate,
00:00:35.780 and he is politically incompetent. He could not shut his mouth for a second, and there are all 0.86
00:00:41.440 of these clips from both his past and his present coming out to haunt him, where he says ridiculous
00:00:47.260 or radical things, and shows how out of touch he is to the average Canadian. You've probably
00:00:53.020 already seen this clip where Mark Carney actually touts his background as a globalist and an elitist
00:00:59.240 as being a good thing. My strength is I know how the world works. I know how to get things done. I'm
00:01:04.600 connected. I can deliver for the country, and my weakness is, you know, people will charge me as
00:01:09.880 being elitist or, you know, a globalist, to use that term, which is, well, that's exactly, you know,
00:01:17.240 it happens to be exactly what we need. That clip reminds me of that clip of Senator Bernie Sanders
00:01:23.780 saying people criticize all of these socialist countries for having bread lines, but that's a
00:01:29.140 good thing because it means people are getting bread. So Mark Carney's saying, like, people are
00:01:33.880 saying that I'm an elitist controlling technocrat, but in fact, we should have an elitist controlling
00:01:40.260 technocrat leading Canada. You can feel Mark Carney's comms director quivering every time he gets
00:01:46.860 up in front of a crowd of people and starts talking because he causes so many fires, and now
00:01:52.360 it appears like Mark Carney is trying to hide himself from the public and just doing the most easy
00:01:58.760 interviews you've ever seen in your life, and when I say easy, I mean Rosemary Barton easy, and even
00:02:05.080 then, he is basically just putting people to sleep. Mark Carney only has two modes, putting people to
00:02:11.780 sleep and saying insanely radical things. This is why I have taken to calling him Mark's Carney, and I
00:02:19.960 want to get to that episode a little bit later. I called him that on social media, and the reaction
00:02:25.980 from liberals and leftists was hilarious, but here is Mark Carney on CBC trying to do some damage control
00:02:33.480 by doing his best John Kerry impression he has. One of the most important things we can do
00:02:39.160 for Canada, but also for the negotiations, is to concentrate on what we can control. We can't
00:02:44.760 control President Trump, but we can control what we do here at home to reinforce our economy, so that's
00:02:50.840 middle class tax cut, that's investing in infrastructure, it's building new trade routes,
00:02:55.240 it's doing all the things, it's having one Canadian economy instead of 13, and what I'm being more and more
00:03:01.400 clear about is exactly how I would do that if I am selected. And I will ask you some of those
00:03:06.280 questions, but I still think that it would be helpful. This is actual brain poison to watch,
00:03:12.120 and he's already trying to pivot himself into being the fiscally moderate guy. Maybe I would back tax cuts
00:03:18.840 for the middle class. He's not going to do it. Do you know how I know? Well, although Mark Carney
00:03:25.080 pretends that he's an outsider because he's never been elected, for the last four to five years, he has been
00:03:31.080 the economic advisor to Justin Trudeau. In fact, Chrystia Freeland can actually divest herself of her
00:03:37.240 terrible record as finance minister, because she can kind of rightfully claim she wasn't even making 1.00
00:03:42.760 decisions the last four years. Mark Carney was telling her what to do, and Justin Trudeau would
00:03:48.200 fire her if she didn't do it. I hope she brings that up at the debates, because it would absolutely
00:03:54.280 destroy his campaign. To put in perspective, if you haven't seen this poll result yet, Main Street
00:04:00.040 Research did a poll of only Liberal Party members, people who have Liberal Party memberships,
00:04:06.680 and it found that Mark Carney is only sitting at 38% support with Chrystia Freeland at 29 and Karina
00:04:13.800 Gould at 18. Ruby Dahl also has five, and Frank Bayles has two. That's pathetic. The Conservative Party
00:04:22.040 leadership race in 2022 was a peer poly of coronation, not because anyone was pulling strings or trying to
00:04:28.600 rig stuff. He was just extremely popular and won with like 68% of the vote, and I think on points it
00:04:34.840 was even more than that. It was crazy how big his win was. 38% is going to be him crawling across the
00:04:42.600 finish line. In fact, this entire leadership race right now reminds me of Hillary Clinton being unable to 0.99
00:04:50.280 put away Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primaries. When you're running in a presidential election, and it works the
00:04:56.680 same way if you're the prime ministerial candidate for your party in Canada, if you're in a party
00:05:02.040 leadership race or a primary, and you can't put away your somewhat kooky and uncharismatic opponent,
00:05:09.880 then you are in really big trouble. I know some people consider Bernie Sanders charismatic, but in
00:05:15.560 terms of his demographic appeals, he should be very easy to beat because he has no support with black or
00:05:21.160 Hispanic voters and it's mostly just middle-class hipster white people voting for him. And it still 0.74
00:05:26.520 took until after California, at like the end of the primary, for her to finally beat Bernie Sanders,
00:05:33.240 even with superdelegates on her side. And now this is also reminding me of Kim Campbell barely beating 1.00
00:05:39.640 Jean Chiré in 1993 when the PC party was also trying to make it a coronation. It's a pattern. If it's supposed
00:05:46.520 to be your coronation and it barely happens, you're not becoming prime minister or at least you're not
00:05:51.160 going to stay prime minister very long in Kim Campbell's case and potentially Mark Carney's.
00:05:57.000 But you look at the man's social media and it's just nothing. It's just him posting like some
00:06:03.880 boilerplate stuff about condemning anti-semitism in which it took him like several hours more than all
00:06:09.640 the other candidates and just posting stuff like this. Canadians want change. Together we can make
00:06:15.720 that happen. Join our campaign and commit to vote today. He's posting nothing. It's because he's a
00:06:21.960 gaff machine. You remember that clip from Kelowna where he said that the fentanyl crisis in Canada
00:06:27.560 is not a crisis. It's just a challenge. What? He's backed carbon credits. He's backed a carbon tax
00:06:35.320 tariff. He has backed oil and gas development in Brazil and the UAE but said that Canada shouldn't
00:06:41.560 be doing that. He has supported having massive government subsidies of green energy to build an
00:06:48.200 energy firewall against the United States if they ever cut off energy transportation to Canada. It's
00:06:55.160 asinine. At the same time, Chrystia Freeland, as an absolute dud of her candidate herself, is actually 1.00
00:07:02.120 starting to rack up more endorsements and it's because a lot of people are looking at Mark Carney.
00:07:08.040 They realize that this guy cannot walk five feet without stepping on his own shoelaces and they're
00:07:13.320 coming back to give a fourth look at Chrystia Freeland who's not particularly good at all. She's 0.99
00:07:19.400 actually getting some ministers and other senior liberal officials endorsing her right like Rob Oliphant
00:07:25.080 here. Other people, I'm trying to find other people she's gotten endorsements from. She keeps
00:07:30.360 reposting the same stuff. But she's gotten Jean Yip. Other liberal MPs are all coming up for her now. 1.00
00:07:37.160 John Aldegg, a former liberal MP, he lost his election as a BC NDP candidate recently to Harmon
00:07:43.400 Bangu in the provincial election. But she's starting to start racking up the endorsements once again. 0.88
00:07:49.400 And it's because Carney is actually a liability right now. The Liberal Party thought they were
00:07:54.680 getting the exterior of Carney. The button down central banker who appeals to a certain type of
00:08:01.240 older middle class voter. What they really got was what I refer to as Marx Carney because this guy is
00:08:08.920 the definition of what a Soviet technocratic economic manager would be back in the 1960s and 70s.
00:08:16.120 I had a post go viral today where I said that conservatives, not the conservative party
00:08:23.160 specifically, but just conservatives in Canada in general, should start referring to Mark Carney as
00:08:29.240 Marx Carney. And this post went very viral. It already has 112,000 views on X. And I did this as a
00:08:38.200 legitimate joke on the Liberals as well as the left in general in Canada. Because as soon as I referred to
00:08:44.520 him as Marx Carney, they all started running out of the woodwork to say, no, actually, he's not a Marxist
00:08:50.840 at all. He's not a communist. And then started proving me right in my more general point that he's a
00:08:56.840 big government technocrat. They start going through how he's basically a social democrat, that he is a
00:09:03.800 central banker. He is a Keynesian economist and stuff like that. It's like, guys, you are describing
00:09:11.640 60s socialist politics. You are describing, again, like I said, the sort of man that in Russia would
00:09:18.440 be the person telling you what to do, when to do it, and how exactly to do it. There's this idea that
00:09:25.640 all the communists in the Soviet Union and Maoist China were romantic revolutionaries like Joseph
00:09:31.880 Stalin or Mao Zedong. That's not really how it went. Yes, you had the crazy, uh, kleptocratic
00:09:39.400 psychos on top, like Mao and Stalin and Lenin and Pol Pot. But the people below them were other than
00:09:46.840 in Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge regime, because they killed anyone with glasses. But they would usually have 1.00
00:09:52.200 people staring at charts and trying to crunch the numbers, figuring out what should be put out,
00:09:58.280 how much money should go towards it, and how many workers should be hired and stuff like that.
00:10:03.240 That is exactly who Mark Carney is. He is a technocratic lefty who would be, who would fit in
00:10:10.200 perfectly in a Soviet department of economic management. I also have to show you the post I
00:10:16.360 got, because this was a great AI image I generated of Mark Carney himself, uh, that I think that really
00:10:23.080 drove the point home, and this post also went viral. So I've been kind of tearing it up today.
00:10:28.200 Make sure you guys follow me on X. I am a good time over there. But we have Mark Carney here.
00:10:34.280 And again, it does fit. Most people will get my point. I'm not meaning this literally,
00:10:40.600 but the fact that my point is generally correct, that the man is the sort of person who backs
00:10:45.960 central bank digital currency and wants to monitor what people spend and limit how much carbon that
00:10:53.000 you're emitting and how much meat you're eating is very telling. Nate Erkson Smith even endorsed the
00:10:58.520 man who is in favor of mass drug legalization, as well as trying to limit how much red meat people
00:11:05.240 consume because Nate Erkson Smith is a radical vegetarian. Anyways, I now want to bring up this
00:11:12.040 clip from the UNZone website of Mark Carney talking about basically trying to fast forward a green economy,
00:11:19.960 and again, like always, he ends up making himself look like a radical twit.
00:11:23.960 Exactly. This society is putting tremendous value on achieving net zero. So the companies
00:11:31.400 and those who invest in them and lend to them who are part of the solution will be rewarded. But those
00:11:37.160 who are lagging behind and are still part of the problem will be punished.
00:11:42.920 Does that sound like somebody who's just moderate? We're going to punish.
00:11:46.200 Dialogue has shifted from viewing climate change as a risk. And of course, it is an enormous risk.
00:11:52.840 We recognize that. But to seeing the opportunity, first point, and really translating that into a
00:11:59.720 single objective, which is to move our economies to net zero as quickly as possible. That's a tremendously
00:12:07.720 exciting development because what we have now in private finance is a focus on a clear goal,
00:12:14.360 net zero, and finding the opportunities to advance that and to be rewarded by it. And also at the same
00:12:22.760 time, not just for private finance to judge which companies are part of the solution. But what's
00:12:28.600 exciting and interesting and challenging for the private financial sector is increasingly they too
00:12:33.240 are being judged. So now what he is describing here is effectively a government incentive structure
00:12:39.960 to cause large investment hedge funds and whatnot to only pick government approved net zero companies.
00:12:47.800 This is the sort of thing that BlackRock and Larry Fink do through ESG scores. And Mark Carney is a big
00:12:54.200 believer in this and I don't think he's changed. I want to play one more clip of the man because again,
00:12:59.960 it's crazy how much ammunition this guy generates. The NRA must love him because this man generates
00:13:07.240 ammunition all day long. Here is him on Global News, that clip that Melissa Lansman, the deputy leader
00:13:15.160 of the Conservative Party highlighted that I think is quite good. Again, this man, these are recent clips
00:13:21.560 of his campaign. He cannot turn it off. He has no good answers to anyone saying, aren't you kind of
00:13:27.640 basically exactly the same as Justin Trudeau? If anything, that's giving him credit because he's
00:13:32.920 worse than Justin Trudeau. Especially considering a lot of the values you have, even the issues you
00:13:38.840 support are very much tied to similar things that the Prime Minister currently believes. First thing,
00:13:44.680 I agreed to build out a task force for growth for the Prime Minister. That task force for growth is now
00:13:51.480 embodied in me and the steps we're going to take forward. So he just confirms it right there,
00:13:56.360 even as he's trying to pivot off of him being exactly like Justin Trudeau. He just admits that
00:14:01.320 everything that Justin Trudeau was doing up to this point was put together by Mark Carney. The debates
00:14:07.480 could be a bloodbath right now because there is definitely blood in the water around Mark Carney's
00:14:12.840 campaign because I like to quote this Civil War, a little like paraphrasing a Civil War quote,
00:14:19.560 that while bringing superior forces and firepower to the battlefield, he also unfortunately brought
00:14:26.760 himself because Mark Carney is going to be a terrible debater. Especially in the French debate,
00:14:33.240 where Frank Bayliss is going to run circles around him and Karina Gould and Chrystia Freeland obviously
00:14:40.120 also have better French than he does. Frank Bayliss has the best because he's from Montreal,
00:14:44.840 and what I've heard is that Mark Carney's French is meh. And right now, if he starts losing Quebec
00:14:51.080 voters, his path to victory might fade very quickly. And then the English debate, he'll have Ruby Dalla 0.83
00:14:56.840 to contend with, who looks like she is just preparing to just throw haymakers at the guy 1.00
00:15:02.600 the entire time. And if the Liberal Party ends up with Chrystia Freeland, I really don't see them as
00:15:08.680 being in a better position than they would be with Mark Carney. I think both of them basically pose
00:15:14.680 the same problem to the Liberal Party. Mark Carney on paper is better because he's less well known
00:15:19.880 and has less baggage, but he has different types of baggage. It's just not as directly connected to
00:15:26.120 Trudeau as it is for Freeland because she's been standing beside the guy for nine years. With Mark Carney,
00:15:32.520 it's more so that there is a closet full of thousands of skeletons that's kind of open right
00:15:38.200 now. But if he wins and becomes the leader and the prime minister, that thing is going to be thrown
00:15:43.160 open by the Conservatives and a lot of other influencers online, and they're going to pour out
00:15:47.800 in front of Canadians with every one of his far left ideas. He is an economic manager. He's not a free
00:15:54.200 market guy. My whole Mark Carney op today proved that because all the Liberals who are supporting him
00:16:01.240 would never say he's free market because they don't want a free market guy. They criticize
00:16:05.720 Pierpolia for being the free market guy, but they can't say he's a communist, but I also never accused
00:16:11.240 him of being a communist. They just have to use weasel words to describe a technocratic busybody
00:16:17.720 without admitting that he's effectively a socialist. Anyways, so that should be it for me today, guys.
00:16:25.720 Support me by liking this video, subscribing to the channel, and leaving me a comment.
00:16:30.680 As much fun as I have covering politics, the liberal leadership race is also extremely annoying
00:16:35.720 to cover because these people are the worst, and there's really no bright spots to talk about
00:16:41.480 other than anticipating their failure one day when Pierpolia beats them. But anyways,
00:16:47.080 so that should be it for me. See you guys later.