The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 19, 2026


Mark Carney’s Big Trade Lie Just Got Exposed by the Americans


Episode Stats


Length

27 minutes

Words per minute

185.15984

Word count

5,049

Sentence count

275

Harmful content

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Today on the show, I talk about the current state of trade negotiations between Canada and the United States and why it's not looking good for the Trudeau government. I also talk about why the Liberals should elect Justin Trudeau as their next Prime Minister.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.080 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.
00:00:06.700 Today on the show, I want to talk to you guys about another big issue for the Kearney Liberals.
00:00:13.120 They have a majority government right now, and so they have to perform,
00:00:17.060 and it's going to put a lot more focus onto the things they haven't been doing right up until now,
00:00:23.180 like getting a trade deal with the United States.
00:00:25.960 Now, the liberals are just devolving into more excuses and more anti-American rhetoric to excuse the fact that they do not have a trade deal yet.
00:00:35.600 But we have to remember, this was like the one promise from Mark Carney during the last federal election.
00:00:41.920 He didn't really promise all that much outside of getting a trade deal, like he had a small tax cut, a small immigration cut he was running on.
00:00:50.940 But the main thing that he talked about the most was that he's dealt with Donald Trump before and he knows how to negotiate whatever that means.
00:00:59.640 It was the vaguest language used around it.
00:01:01.820 So that's why you should elect him, because he's going to fix this whole trade problem and build Canada strong.
00:01:08.700 Well, he hasn't.
00:01:09.640 In fact, his deadlines for getting a trade deal were July 2025, and it's getting closer and closer to the year anniversary of his last deadline that he gave himself, but I guess we're all just being a bunch of partisan hacks pointing this out.
00:01:25.860 But today, I want to take you guys through where the trade deal currently stands and why this is not looking very good for Mark Carney, as well as Pierre Polyev doing a really good statement on this issue.
00:01:38.420 I didn't expect him to actually use the language that he did in the post that he put out just about an hour ago, but it's a big improvement over how the Conservatives were previously talking about trade.
00:01:49.380 This, if I was to say over the past six months, has been the best issue for the Conservatives in terms of improvement.
00:01:56.400 Before, like a year ago, they were using too much language that sounded like the liberals talking about how, oh, yes, Trump and the Americans are being very unfair to us and that we will subsidize our industries to support them and we will resist the tariffs.
00:02:11.840 Yes, generally speaking, should we maybe help our industry out?
00:02:15.780 Should we be trying to put out countermeasures?
00:02:18.760 Sure.
00:02:19.360 But what I've liked that Polyev has been doing more recently
00:02:22.080 has been focusing on solutions about how you actually get a deal done.
00:02:26.900 Let's stop coping with tariffs.
00:02:29.320 Let's figure out how to get rid of them.
00:02:31.560 And the Liberals have nothing on this issue,
00:02:34.180 which means that Polyev is getting himself a big advantage here.
00:02:37.940 Anyways, before we get into some of the clips here,
00:02:40.220 I just want to do the quick reminder. If you like the channel, consider becoming a channel member.
00:02:45.720 There's a join button below the video. You can make a small monthly contribution and it helps
00:02:50.440 make the channel more sustainable for me and allows me to be less reliant on the YouTube
00:02:55.040 algorithm. Probably going to make that my shorter plug. I do usually plug too many things and I'm
00:03:00.740 going to stick to that for now. But we have here independent journalist Max Genest at the liberal
00:03:07.800 convention about a week and a half ago, asking the liberal minister who is in charge of the
00:03:15.120 trade issue with the United States, Dominic LeBlanc, how things are going. And from this
00:03:20.960 interview that Max Jenis did, it's kind of exploded from here of more and more people asking the
00:03:26.120 question, what have the liberals actually accomplished over the last year? Have we
00:03:30.800 actually had any progress on the trade issue? And it seems like the answer is no. And the Americans
00:03:35.580 are even saying that the Canadians are lying about how willing they've even been to negotiate.
00:03:40.620 How are trade negotiations going with the United States of America?
00:03:44.860 We continue to have weekly conversations, all different levels. I speak to U.S. cabinet
00:03:52.100 ministers. My colleagues talk to their counterparts. Those negotiations are necessarily in private.
00:04:00.340 What about trade? What about provincial trade barriers? When are they going down?
00:04:05.580 We took all the federal ones down.
00:04:08.060 So the good news is the government of Canada has no exemptions to free trade in Canada.
00:04:13.240 Now we're working with the provinces to bring theirs down too.
00:04:16.140 Now, what you will notice in this 35 second clip is that Dominic LeBlanc has effectively said nothing.
00:04:23.700 There was nothing said there.
00:04:25.720 Max asked him about trying to get a trade deal with the United States, how the progress was going on that.
00:04:30.840 And he says, well, there's conversations.
00:04:32.420 I talk to U.S. cabinet ministers all the time, but no actual progress update.
00:04:38.240 Max isn't asking him to just spill it out all on the floor now.
00:04:41.940 It's a walk and talk interview.
00:04:43.560 It's not like he's wanting a 10-minute breakdown of where the trade discussions are right now
00:04:49.320 on each different little friction that they're having.
00:04:52.120 He's just saying, is there progress?
00:04:53.620 And he couldn't even say there was progress.
00:04:55.920 They're just talking.
00:04:57.100 And then on interprovincial trade, which we will actually be getting to as well, he says,
00:05:01.260 well, we've taken down all the federal interprovincial trade barriers.
00:05:05.380 Well, the federal government was never actually the problem when it came to interprovincial trade barriers.
00:05:10.880 It's interprovincial.
00:05:13.200 What he's saying there is that, no, there's been no progress.
00:05:15.960 Oh, the federal government's taken care of its side of things.
00:05:19.200 That doesn't mean anything.
00:05:20.420 The federal government was never the problem.
00:05:22.180 The federal government, though, had promised leadership on this and to actually push provinces to lower the trade barriers.
00:05:28.020 And since the election, since Carney ran on this as one of his other promises, a more minor one, though, nothing has been done. He has kept having meetings of premiers where none of the premiers have actually done much of anything to lower regulations that affect products and workers from other provinces working or shipping things into their province.
00:05:49.720 because all of them are self-interested and they don't want to drop these trade barriers because
00:05:54.560 their workers or their unions or some sort of corporations in their province like them and they
00:06:00.740 want to keep out competition or workers from another part of the country. So another area
00:06:05.860 that Carney has gotten nothing done in. But reacting to this, we had Pete Hoekstra, the US
00:06:11.840 ambassador to Canada, on the podcast of Jasmine Lane. I thought she did a great interview here
00:06:17.000 And he reacts to Dominic LeBlanc about five, six days later doing his own press conference talking about issues with trade with the United States.
00:06:26.580 And Pete Hoogstra basically just calls him a liar that no, Canada has not actually made any overtures to the United States, has not done anything that would indicate that Canada will sign a deal.
00:06:39.120 Conversations with U.S. counterparts remain productive and we remain engaged.
00:06:45.420 no actually it's not an intense negotiation okay there really have been no serious negotiations
00:06:51.580 since october of last year with a smile and a smirk they're proud of that they're proud of the
00:06:56.860 fact that they're putting people in kentucky we want to resolve the disputes on steel a matter of
00:07:02.460 fact we had that pretty much resolved in october and the canadians blew that up okay it wasn't the
00:07:10.060 the Americans. So you can always write off what Pete Hoekstra is saying. He's the U.S. ambassador.
00:07:15.500 He's going to give a pro-U.S. position. But we've seen Trump and other U.S. administration officials
00:07:22.240 give updates on the things that they're asking for from Canadians. They wanted supply management
00:07:27.520 softened or eliminated. They wanted other sorts of trade barriers that Canada has eliminated and
00:07:34.320 maybe we could get rid of the U.S. ones, the U.S. tariffs. They don't want us trading with China,
00:07:39.000 for instance. Polyev made the smart play of saying, how about Canada agrees to rip up our
00:07:45.180 new trade agreement that Carney just signed with the Chinese and use that as leverage to get zero
00:07:51.900 tariffs on at least, you know, cars and steel. We can figure out how to do that. But the Carney
00:07:57.240 government has been basically just sitting there comatose, chit-chatting, but never actually making
00:08:02.860 any concessions or making any demands. It's basically just been a holding pattern from here.
00:08:07.300 and you can tell based on the way that people like Dominic LeBlanc talk about trade. There's
00:08:14.200 no substance to any of his updates. It's always that everything is secretive and you can't know
00:08:19.400 where we're at. Sorry, everything needs to be classified. Like, it doesn't. It really does not
00:08:24.440 need to be. Here is a question from Jacob Mantle in a committee meeting. This is a conservative
00:08:30.220 of MP asking the Liberals, asking Dominic LeBlanc of where the trade negotiations are. And
00:08:36.780 this is just further exposing Carney has no intention of actually getting it done. We're
00:08:42.740 going to get to Carney a little bit later and his anti-American rhetoric to try and justify
00:08:47.040 not signing a trade deal. But here is the questions from Jacob Mantle.
00:08:51.040 Minister, you opened the door to a few questions on our Canada-US relationship. So I wanted to ask
00:08:56.440 you on that. Last week, Mr. Greer was at the Hudson Institute and he said, quote,
00:09:01.980 we've worked really closely with the Mexicans over the past year and they've resolved a lot of
00:09:05.860 issues. The Canadians, we have some issues with them that haven't been resolved. And then the
00:09:10.880 U.S. ambassador has said that there have been no substantive discussions in five months. So what
00:09:15.900 are the issues that haven't been resolved and why aren't we at the table? So, Madam Chair,
00:09:22.300 through you i disagree with i think two premises of the question we are at the table you disagree
00:09:28.380 with mr greer i was mr greer said that i think it was you were quoting the ambassador mr greer
00:09:33.980 says we have some issues with the canadians that haven't been resolved you disagree with him
00:09:37.340 no we're in that we're at the table to part of your second later part of your ambassador we're
00:09:42.220 at the table discussing those very issues with the americans i had a conversation with secretary
00:09:48.460 Lutnik early last week. My colleague Janice Chaget, Ambassador Wiseman, are at those tables
00:09:54.720 discussing those very issues. I had a very cordial... But what are the actual problems
00:10:01.400 preventing a resolution here? Because the Americans are claiming that the Mexicans have been
00:10:07.200 far easier to deal with. And I'm not here to stand up for America and say that you better be nice to
00:10:12.420 them. It's not about niceness. This whole situation has nothing to do with it. It doesn't
00:10:17.600 matter that we're even a smaller country. If we demonstrate the areas that we are willing to move
00:10:23.180 on, if they move on this area, the thing is that the Americans would actually have to take that
00:10:28.120 seriously. They couldn't just say, we want everything and you get nothing. Because if we
00:10:32.520 were acting in good faith up to this point, and then the Americans got obstinate, we could just
00:10:36.860 pour that out into the public and we could make the Trump administration look bad. And we could
00:10:40.600 say, by the way, you guys are all paying higher prices, because even though we keep making great
00:10:45.180 offers, they won't take them. The problem is that we can't claim that because it doesn't sound like
00:10:50.960 we're the side willing to make any concessions. We look like we won't make anything. And we can
00:10:56.800 say, well, they're the ones who hit us with tariffs. Okay, well, we've had supply management
00:11:00.860 tariffs on them since like the 60s, since like the 70s. Come on. Like, I know their tariffs are
00:11:07.940 more intense on certain items. Our tariffs have been less intense when it comes to dairy and
00:11:12.840 poultry in terms of the effect on each of our entire economies. Yes, the magnitude of it compared
00:11:19.460 to the magnitude of the new ones is different, but they've been on longer. So let's just call it even
00:11:24.320 and let's figure out a way of meeting in the middle here. But we're not trying to meet in the
00:11:28.300 middle because Carney, this is the dirty secret, wants fights with the Americans because it helps
00:11:33.900 his political agenda to be seen as Mr. Anti-Trump. He's basically trying to have his cake and eat it
00:11:39.760 to. He wants to be the guy that all the business liberals think is going to solve the trade issue.
00:11:45.240 But he also wants all the elbows up liberals to be at that perpetual fever pitched anger at
00:11:52.120 Trump and the Americans. So he can't sign a deal with them because it would indicate reasonable
00:11:55.960 that it's on the side of the Americans. And so he's constantly pretending he's going to get a
00:12:00.420 trade deal signed. He's going to resolve this issue. At the same time, he's constantly attacking
00:12:04.780 the Americans and trying to distance ourselves from them, like he did in the recent video we're
00:12:09.400 going to get to in a second here as well as in instances at davos and elsewhere you know saying
00:12:15.200 during the campaign and since then our amer our relationship with the americans have ended
00:12:18.900 the canada u.s relationship is no longer going to be as it was feel productive conversation
00:12:25.060 with ambassador greer about those issues what i mean could you tell us what those issues are
00:12:30.860 i've got four to finish please mr mantel i just like to know what those issues are if you could
00:12:35.940 maybe bullet point list for us.
00:12:37.480 What are the,
00:12:37.860 you don't have to go through all of them.
00:12:38.920 Maybe the top ones that are sticking points.
00:12:41.480 I don't think we've had an update on what those are.
00:12:44.320 And this is a fair question.
00:12:45.980 This doesn't affect anything.
00:12:47.760 To vocalize what the issues might be,
00:12:49.560 it's not like you're spilling the beans out onto the floor
00:12:52.180 and we can't,
00:12:53.020 now we can't get a deal signed if people know.
00:12:55.200 This is basic stuff.
00:12:56.840 Is it the autos?
00:12:57.820 Is it the dairy?
00:12:58.880 Is it the poultry?
00:13:00.120 Is it steel?
00:13:01.660 Is it lumber?
00:13:02.500 Which one is the problem?
00:13:03.960 Maybe we can figure that out.
00:13:05.140 And then maybe you can bring provincial partners in who have a heavy interest in one of those
00:13:09.280 industries that's mostly affected.
00:13:11.240 Maybe we have to make a concession on one of these specific issues, and we can figure
00:13:16.000 out a way of supporting those it will affect in the country.
00:13:18.980 I don't like protectionism, and it's because it ends up basically making your industry
00:13:24.060 very sensitive to regulatory changes.
00:13:26.680 When you've protected an industry for too long, it becomes weaker and weaker.
00:13:30.240 And when it's opened up to American competition, yes, it could fall apart.
00:13:33.280 So if that is something where we're going to have to take away supply management tariffs and it could hurt the dairy and poultry industry, let's find a way of slashing their taxes basically to the bone so that they can now adapt to the new environment that they're going to be operating in.
00:13:50.280 And I've got 30 seconds left. Maybe you could just bullet point a few of the ones that are top.
00:13:54.120 So, no, I'm not going to bullet point the details of the specific conversations we're having.
00:13:58.800 I didn't ask for that, Minister.
00:14:00.360 You asked for a list of bullet points a second ago.
00:14:04.280 Top issues, that's all.
00:14:05.620 Yeah.
00:14:06.260 So you notice Ambassador Greer didn't enumerate them either.
00:14:10.000 However, the U.S. trade...
00:14:13.260 Yeah, but they're getting a deal signed with Mexicans.
00:14:16.480 The Americans have been getting way more substantive trade deals signed with other countries than we have. 0.85
00:14:21.580 So apparently, so it seems like it's an us problem.
00:14:23.780 So can we even hear, can Jacob Mantle as a Conservative member of Parliament not hear what the sticking points are?
00:14:30.920 We're not asking him to give us transcripts of the meetings.
00:14:33.900 Just, is it the dairy?
00:14:35.940 Is it something else about Canada?
00:14:37.600 Do they want our defence spending higher?
00:14:39.500 What is it?
00:14:41.820 Representative's office publishes something called the National Trades Estimates,
00:14:46.320 where they have a series of non-tariff barriers that they believe apply to different jurisdictions.
00:14:51.780 Canada has a list. That would be a good place for you to start.
00:14:55.860 What the Americans say to us privately is often consistent with what they say publicly.
00:15:01.440 You've seen the president, you've seen Secretary Lutnik, Ambassador Greer talk about these issues.
00:15:06.540 We continue to remain engaged in conversations with them to resolve those issues.
00:15:12.340 But I'll finish with this, Madam Chair.
00:15:15.020 We're not prepared to deal with these things as a one-off.
00:15:19.160 If if we're going to resolve some of these issues that Ambassador Greer referred to, Canada is ready and willing to do that work.
00:15:28.840 But as part of a deal, a larger agreement that brings relief to sectors of the Canadian economy that are under considerable pressure now and brings greater certainty around the USMCA or KUSMA review process.
00:15:44.620 So we're not dealing with your point list as one offs, but as part of a larger agreement, Canada is absolutely ready.
00:15:51.720 Notice how he didn't say he took a long time of saying, well, I wouldn't want to put in a list.
00:15:56.880 Maybe I put it more in a story or a limerick.
00:16:01.240 Maybe I would do that. But he doesn't end up actually telling us anything by the end.
00:16:05.540 It's frustrating to put it to say the least.
00:16:09.120 Here's another Conservative MP, Adam Chambers, trying to get effectively the same information out of Dominic LeBlanc and also not being able to get anything because, again, it looks like the Kearney Liberals are not trying to get a trade deal.
00:16:23.360 That's why they're being obtuse, they're being vague, they're having conversations and not going anywhere with them.
00:16:29.680 but why is it the impression of the americans that there have been no substantive discussions
00:16:37.140 in five months on this very important deal that is a priority for your government as you say
00:16:42.380 it's a good question i'd speculate on why certain things in public opinion in the united states are
00:16:50.200 what they are i'm not sure is is particularly constructive i but i do think this is in the
00:16:55.200 public record. It's in public opinion. It's the opinion of the ambassadors. It's the opinion of
00:17:00.300 the trade negotiators and Trump himself. What? Why do they have this impression? Oh, I don't want to
00:17:05.920 get into public opinion. It has nothing to do with public opinion. It has to do with opinion
00:17:09.860 of the other people on the other side of the conversations you're having, thinking that
00:17:14.680 you're not actually doing anything with them, that you're just messing around and not actually
00:17:19.500 attempting to get a deal signed heard that as i said earlier we had made considerable progress i
00:17:25.680 was with the prime minister when he went to the white house the oval office and then the working
00:17:28.960 lunch afterwards in october um and in the days that followed the weeks that followed mr sabia
00:17:36.020 and i then ambassador hillman we we had advanced considerably the americans decided to suspend that
00:17:43.300 work that that was a public record um the conversations have restarted but you decided
00:17:49.100 to suspend that but they restart in private and those as i say my conversation with secretary
00:17:54.540 lutnik on monday last week was a 45 minute positive private conversation again it's so
00:18:02.780 there's obvious excuses like what like what dominic leblanc can't like you know it's like
00:18:07.420 he can't pee when people are watching or something like that he can't talk about trade when the
00:18:11.660 cameras are on or like when people are seeing when people are looking at him he's like well
00:18:16.460 Don't be the trade minister if you aren't going to actually be willing to disclose anything that's
00:18:21.620 happening to the Canadian public. I want to now get to what Polyev had said on this, because I
00:18:28.060 think he has a really good way of describing what the kind of magic trick that Mark Carney's trying
00:18:33.840 to run here. I say it's a magic trick in the sense it's a little bit of rhetorical, political magic,
00:18:39.680 trying to be the guy trying to solve the problem while also trying to make the problem worse,
00:18:44.280 thus making people want you to quote-unquote solve the problem more and because it's like the
00:18:52.060 it's the whole anti-american pro can to think he keeps going back and forth on actually maybe i'll
00:18:56.740 get to pauliev's uh tweet in just a second i want to first get to this video of mark carney on his
00:19:04.760 own youtube channel giving canadians a history lesson let's be clear what he says here on the
00:19:10.620 War of 1812 is what I would consider anti-American disinformation. We are going to cite a war from
00:19:16.900 over 200 years ago as a kind of, well, this is why Canada always has to be, you know, not trustworthy.
00:19:22.620 We can't trust the Americans, guys. Just be careful. You can't trust those guys. So who cares
00:19:27.740 if I'm not getting a trade deal signed? And there's comfort and confidence to be found in
00:19:32.560 our country's history. After all, our ancestors built an improbable country in an inhospitable
00:19:38.620 land where people were free to live their own lives. When I get into the office, I always look
00:19:44.680 at this statue on my desk. It was given to me by Mike Myers just over a year ago, and this
00:19:50.760 is General Isaac Brock. Brock was a hero who fought and gave his life for our forebearers
00:19:58.180 in the War of 1812. Before Canada even existed on paper, it had a shape in Brock's imagination.
00:20:05.460 Faced with the threat of an American invasion, brought, built alliances across our land and inspired what would eventually become Canada.
00:20:15.600 Others carried that effort forward.
00:20:17.680 People like General de Salaberry, citizens like the Voltigeur, who defended Shadowgi, and indigenous heroes such as Chief Tecumseh, who united indigenous nations.
00:20:26.680 What does this have to do with anything?
00:20:28.440 Because, by the way, this was part of a trade and economic video.
00:20:31.900 This was talking about how we're going to get through trade issues and economic kind of hardships right now.
00:20:38.240 The kind of the rough waters of the economy.
00:20:41.060 And he goes into a soliloquy on the War of 1812 and defending Canada against America.
00:20:47.620 One, this is a very oversimplification of the War of 1812.
00:20:52.140 America had good reasons to go to war, maybe not invade Canada as a part of it.
00:20:56.820 It's more complicated.
00:20:57.840 this happened 200 years ago and he's just slipping this into the middle of a talk on economics
00:21:03.080 because he really really wants you to just kind of subliminally understand america bad as he's
00:21:09.980 talking about all this to understand that there's no reason for us to sign a trade deal with the
00:21:13.980 americans because don't you realize that those guys over 200 years ago tried to invade us like
00:21:20.840 my goodness before we were even a country but now i want to get back to what paulie have said
00:21:25.240 because this is a good statement on the nonsense that's been going on.
00:21:30.200 Polyev here says,
00:21:31.800 Here's Mark Carney's illusion.
00:21:34.120 He wants to keep Canadians in a state of fear and panic
00:21:36.540 to distract from all of his costly failures at home.
00:21:40.020 The Carney liberals have given us the worst food inflation,
00:21:42.740 the worst household debt, the worst housing costs,
00:21:45.280 and the only shrinking economy in the G7.
00:21:48.720 He has not repealed a single anti-development law,
00:21:51.440 approved a single pipeline, and housing construction is actually falling.
00:21:54.520 To top it all off, he's doubling the deficit Justin Trudeau left behind.
00:21:58.820 These are all liberal-made problems that Carney made worse.
00:22:02.320 And as for the U.S., Mark Carney's talk of a rupture with the customer that buys two-thirds of our goods is not a plan.
00:22:10.320 He has not negotiated a single free trade agreement with any country on Earth.
00:22:14.640 The meetings, photo ops, and non-binding memoranda are all an illusion.
00:22:19.640 Mark Carney's agenda is about enriching a small group of well-connected liberal elites like himself
00:22:24.140 who get corporate handouts of tax dollars and use tax havens to avoid paying the same bills they are charging you.
00:22:30.600 If we want to be affordable at home, safe at home, and strong at home, we must make real change at home.
00:22:36.460 And so it goes into just conservative rhetoric about what they want to do.
00:22:40.920 But this is what I mean about the magic trick that Carney is trying to pull off on Canadians.
00:22:47.440 and, you know, Polly calls it an illusion here, but it's good to be the guy at the back of the
00:22:53.060 room trying to ruin the magic trick for everybody else in this particular occasion. Mark Carney,
00:22:58.820 again, is trying to be the Mr. Trade Deal. He's trying to be Mr. Pipeline. He wants to be Mr.
00:23:04.280 Economic Growth. At the same time, he doesn't want to lower taxes. He doesn't want to actually do
00:23:08.520 anything that would move us towards building a pipeline, and he doesn't want to actually get a
00:23:12.360 trade deal. And the conservatives need to sit there and actually teach people about the rhetorical
00:23:18.280 tricks he's using. He's using anti-American rhetoric and anti-American fear-mongering
00:23:22.800 to make you take your eye off the ball of the fact that he has no intention of actually fulfilling
00:23:28.180 his only major election promise, which was to get a trade deal signed. Because if he gets one signed,
00:23:34.660 he can't use anti-American rhetoric in the next election. He'd have to actually run on his record
00:23:40.280 and his record sucks. But, you know, I want to now jump over to what J.J. McCullough said on this 0.97
00:23:47.900 because I thought it was a good point here about the rhetoric that Carney is using. Maybe I should
00:23:53.460 have opened this up earlier. It's probably the last thing I'm going to talk about today. J.J.
00:23:57.620 McCullough, who I really respect, says it's pretty obvious at this point that the Carney plan is to
00:24:02.880 try and keep this country in a perpetual state of hate and fear towards the U.S. and use this to
00:24:07.920 keep himself popular. His video today, with its long and gratuitous evocation of the 1812 war,
00:24:15.780 makes this clearer than ever. I could not imagine Keir Starmer giving a speech where he's like,
00:24:21.200 I keep a statue of General Montgomery on my desk and look at it every day to remind myself to never 1.00
00:24:25.980 for one moment let my guard down in the face of our common foe, the scheming German. And that's 1.00
00:24:31.640 right, like that would even be more appropriate since at least he would be talking about something
00:24:35.860 to happen, you know, less than 100 years ago, you know, World War II. We're, we have, he has a
00:24:41.660 little statue given to him by now washed up comedian Mike Myers to remind him of why you
00:24:47.920 can't trust the Americans. No, we can't trust you. We can't trust you because you promised to get a 0.55
00:24:55.080 trade deal with those untrustworthy people. Now you're like, ah, I was just kidding. Well, then
00:25:00.400 stop being prime minister and stop promising things that you had no intention of actually
00:25:04.860 fulfilling. My goodness, this feels like basic stuff, people. If you're still voting liberal,
00:25:10.080 and you let him go on the trade deal not getting signed, you're the problem. You are a problem. 0.92
00:25:16.620 If you let him get away with not actually fulfilling his big election promise and say,
00:25:21.480 well, it's because you can't trust Trump, you can't trust the Americans, then don't promise
00:25:25.880 that you can trust them to get a deal signed with them. I actually think you can trust them,
00:25:30.360 but the liberals don't want you to trust them, because if you trust them, then they can't scare
00:25:34.900 you into voting liberal anymore. Anyways, with that all being said, thank you guys for tuning
00:25:40.700 into this video on this fine Sunday. Make sure to leave a like, subscribe, share the video,
00:25:47.060 of course leave a comment, and consider becoming a channel member and making a monthly contribution.
00:25:52.540 Even a very small one helps make the channel more sustainable for me, because every once in a while
00:25:57.460 the youtube algorithm just decides to kick old wyatt claypool in the face like it sounds it sounds
00:26:03.860 it's very like in a certain sense it's very self-serving for me to go over this because i'm
00:26:07.840 not trying to like whine and be like i'm gonna go hungry tomorrow if you don't give i'm fine
00:26:11.660 the the one thing it always gets up like on my nerves is when you're you make a video and like
00:26:16.580 you hit publish and youtube just like looks at your video and just decides it hates it like that
00:26:21.440 video is like its least favorite stepchild and you'll hit publish on a video and the video will
00:26:27.360 creep over maybe a few thousand views after several hours. And it's like, and you can tell
00:26:33.700 that YouTube is just not showing the video to anyone. Even subscribers aren't finding it. So
00:26:37.620 if you've ever had that moment where you're like, why hasn't Wyatt not uploaded something in like a
00:26:42.920 week? I upload literally every day. Hit the notification bell next to subscribe and it will
00:26:48.420 always let you know when I have a new video out because you cannot trust YouTube to even let you
00:26:53.280 know if I publish something new on your home screen either you have to hit subscriptions and
00:26:57.660 scroll down to find my latest video or you have to have notifications on so you actually know if
00:27:02.880 I put something out because YouTube must tell you if that if I put something new out if you
00:27:08.620 have notifications turned on anyways so with all that being said thank you guys for watching and
00:27:14.340 I'll see you all next time