The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - December 09, 2024


NDP votes to protect Trudeau from Jagmeet Singh's own words!

Topics
Jagmeet Singh hypocrisy Jagmeet Singh GST tax cut debate
Hosted by
Wyatt Claypool
Mentioned
Jagmeet Singh Justin Trudeau Pierre Poilievre Michael Cooper Speaker Peter Julian Jamil Giovanni Thomas Mulcair Burnaby Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Maserati Marxist Guritan Singh Leslyn Lewis Hassan Piker Blaine Higgs Ann Coulter Jack Layton Jason Pugh Angus Reid Kevin Vong and 6 more
Trudeau wants to shut down charities he dislikes (ft. Cameron Côté) Canadians like Trump more than Trudeau, new poll finds!

Episode Stats


Length

20 minutes

Words per minute

181.35

Word count

3,790

Sentence count

238

Harmful content

Toxicity

19

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Jagmeet Singh and the federal NDP have done it once again, they have voted to protect Justin Trudeau's liberal government from another no confidence motion from Tory MPs. This time, the entire no-confidence motion was written in Jagmeet Singh's own words, using his criticisms against Trudeau to justify why the government should be dissolved so we can have another election.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 So Jagmeet Singh and the federal NDP have done it once again.
00:00:04.920 They have voted to protect Justin Trudeau's liberal government from another no-confidence motion from pure Polyev's conservatives.
00:00:13.640 This time, hilariously enough, the entire no-confidence motion was written in Jagmeet Singh's own words,
00:00:21.460 using his criticisms against Trudeau to justify why the government needs to be dissolved so we can have another election.
00:00:28.740 So Jagmeet Singh wants to have it both ways.
00:00:31.040 One day, he wants to get out of his Maserati, holding his very expensive leather bag,
00:00:36.440 sashay up to a podium and have a press conference about how much Trudeau has betrayed working-class Canadians
00:00:42.780 and that he's unfit for office and a corporate stooge.
00:00:46.300 But then the next day, he wants to protect the liberals because, let's face it,
00:00:50.480 the NDP's broke and cannot face another election right now.
00:00:53.480 And he wants to make sure that all of his MPs who qualify for their pensions by October of 2025 get them.
00:01:01.180 It's all cynical.
00:01:02.620 It's very transparent.
00:01:03.780 And this is why the NDP is going absolutely nowhere in the polls right now.
00:01:08.600 It should be easier than ever to be the NDP in Canadian politics
00:01:13.180 because Trudeau's liberal party is on the floor bleeding out.
00:01:17.340 And if, as the NDP, you are the party that's just another step to the left of the liberals.
00:01:23.720 So in theory, you should be raking in new supporters.
00:01:26.980 The problem is people hate Justin Trudeau.
00:01:29.460 And Jagmeet Singh has made himself the executive assistant of Justin Trudeau.
00:01:34.340 So everyone knows that if you vote for the NDP, you're just getting another liberal party.
00:01:40.040 The only way that the NDP and the liberals ever disagree on a policy is along the lines of how much money is being spent on it.
00:01:48.160 How broad is the new program?
00:01:50.460 The NDP are basically just the liberals plus some extra dollar signs.
00:01:54.860 That's pretty much it.
00:01:56.100 The liberals are not corporate.
00:01:57.680 The liberals are big government in the same way that the NDP is big government.
00:02:02.440 And the NDP even criticizes the liberals for, like, you know, shilling for corporations.
00:02:07.060 At the same time, the NDP were in a partnership with them for years, voting on all these same policies that Jagmeet Singh is now criticizing.
00:02:15.260 I want to get into some of the video clips from this, some of the conservative MPs reacting to it, as well as the vote happening on the floor.
00:02:21.600 But first, I just want to mention, if you're not yet a subscriber to this channel, make sure you go hit that subscribe button, hit the like button, leave a comment, and you can always donate to the Give, Send, Go legal fund that's in the description below, as well as pinned at the top of the comments.
00:02:35.080 I always like using lefty people's reactions to things going on, because I always find it very telling about why the left is not doing very well in Canada right now.
00:02:44.040 Here is this guy, Jason Pugh, who says, watch, here, Polyev fails again at the House of Commons as the House of Commons defeats his vote of no confidence.
00:02:53.560 The House has no confidence in Pierre Polyev.
00:02:55.700 Oh my goodness, yeah, yeah, this is the House of Commons having no confidence in Pierre Polyev, because the NDP and Liberals are cynically trying to protect Justin Trudeau from a vote of no confidence in their very unpopular government.
00:03:11.700 The table will now compile the results of the vote.
00:03:17.040 I declare the motion defeated.
00:03:23.380 So this was defeated with only 180 votes, with 152 votes saying that they do want the government dissolved.
00:03:33.800 The only margin that is keeping Justin Trudeau in right now is the NDP.
00:03:38.960 Jagmeet Singh, too, has played this so poorly, but I'm going to get to that in just a second.
00:03:43.540 I'll let it kind of keep playing for a bit here.
00:03:44.960 See that the Honourable Member, the Honourable Leader of the Opposition is rising on a point of order.
00:03:49.320 Mr. Speaker, you went out of your way before the vote to point out that members are not allowed to come and go during the vote.
00:03:56.120 I did note that the NDP leader came in right in the middle of the vote, having missed the fact that he was that the vote was on his own words.
00:04:04.740 Would you please call him to order for having had his team vote against his own words?
00:04:09.580 And that's the real political, like the real political, and I'm going to say game and not in a bad way.
00:04:23.520 Politics, and oftentimes there's a lot about games, power games, communications, strategies.
00:04:29.620 And this is a brilliant communication strategy.
00:04:31.800 Keep making Jagmeet Singh eat his own words.
00:04:35.200 Keep making him obviously carry the water of Justin Trudeau so that Jagmeet Singh keeps bleeding votes towards the Conservatives.
00:04:43.440 Honestly, the NDP might actually lose votes compared to 2021.
00:04:48.880 They're polling at 20, 21% right now, and they got about 17% of the vote back in 2021.
00:04:55.040 But the problem is the NDP always polls higher than they actually get in terms of votes on Election Day because the NDP doesn't have infrastructure to go get the vote out.
00:05:06.040 They don't have the infrastructure to doorknock everywhere.
00:05:08.580 The Liberals and the Conservatives are very, like, fairly wealthy parties these days, though.
00:05:14.080 The Liberals are very broke, almost similarly to the NDP because nobody wants to give them money.
00:05:18.500 But they're able to run a campaign across the entire country.
00:05:21.000 So even in ridings where the Conservatives are obviously not going to win, they still do a little bit of a get-out-the-vote effort.
00:05:27.820 They want to keep their voter numbers up in these ridings.
00:05:30.180 The NDP don't do that.
00:05:31.580 So when the NDP is only polling at 20%, view that as actually the NDP has probably lost a point and a half or two or three points of support
00:05:39.480 because the NDP typically polls around 22%, 23%, and then comes in only at 17% or 18% on Election Day.
00:05:47.600 But I'll let this keep playing out here.
00:05:51.000 I see that the Honourable Member from New Westminster, Burnaby, is also rising on his feet.
00:06:02.480 Thank you very much, Madam, Mr. Speaker.
00:06:05.240 That's very rich coming from the Leader of the Opposition,
00:06:07.880 who has left this House during his own motions in Opposition Day and refused to vote.
00:06:15.320 As you know, Mr. Speaker, it is proper.
00:06:18.320 That's not Paulyov's point, though.
00:06:20.320 It's not that Jagmeet Singh left the room, left the House of Commons chamber. 0.98
00:06:25.440 His point, though, is that Jagmeet Singh's a coward.
00:06:28.040 He has no problem with MPs not being president for certain votes. 0.62
00:06:31.500 That's fine.
00:06:32.380 But it's this particular vote that Jagmeet Singh does not want to show his face in.
00:06:36.940 Peter Julian, frankly, should have just stopped talking.
00:06:40.180 Don't stand up and respond to this.
00:06:41.920 Why are you giving fuel to the humiliation of both your leader and your party?
00:06:47.540 Colleagues, I very patiently listened to the member from the official opposition.
00:06:53.520 I'd like to hear the Honourable Member from New Westminster, Burnaby.
00:06:57.380 I didn't catch the last little bit of his comment.
00:06:59.800 It's a bit rich from the hypocrisy we've seen from the leader of the official opposition.
00:07:07.900 But as you know, you can even see Peter Julian doesn't seem very confident anymore in repeating
00:07:12.400 what he said, realizing that all he's doing is highlighting because saying, well, Paulyov's 0.98
00:07:17.360 also a hypocrite just means that you're admitting Jagmeet Singh is also a hypocrite. 0.98
00:07:21.280 So, like, don't talk. 0.99
00:07:23.760 Don't do this.
00:07:24.280 Why are you doing this, Peter?
00:07:25.400 Mr. Speaker, in virtual parliament, you have the right to vote remotely and come in for
00:07:30.380 a second vote.
00:07:31.100 That is indeed what has happened in this case.
00:07:33.600 Yeah, yeah.
00:07:34.180 That's why Jagmeet Singh couldn't be bothered to show up.
00:07:36.500 He was just too busy, you know, polishing his McLaren, you know, making sure that there
00:07:41.680 wasn't any dirt on his Rolex watch.
00:07:43.220 He couldn't be bothered to be there right now.
00:07:46.420 He's got useless stuff to be doing. 1.00
00:07:48.340 And here's why this is so stupid. 0.99
00:07:51.280 On the behalf of Jagmeet Singh, this is what Jagmeet Singh said three hours ago. 1.00
00:07:56.120 This vote has not yet happened today.
00:07:58.400 So Jagmeet Singh said, here, I'll pull this up so you can see it better.
00:08:02.680 He says, today, new Democrats will vote for a permanent GST tax cut on essentials.
00:08:07.240 What will the conservatives and liberals do?
00:08:09.400 And let's be very clear, the permanent GST tax cut is not actually that big of a deal.
00:08:15.360 There's very limited items you would want the GST removed on.
00:08:18.780 And that's good.
00:08:19.800 I'm actually in favor of any tax relief.
00:08:21.800 But Jagmeet Singh was ballyhooing Justin Trudeau's GST, HST cut until literally like five seconds
00:08:27.920 ago, like three days ago.
00:08:29.400 Jagmeet Singh said, oh, actually, we should make this permanent.
00:08:31.940 And Trudeau's a hack.
00:08:32.840 And Polyev's a hack, too. 0.99
00:08:34.280 Because Polyev doesn't like the stupid date and switch, the GST cut because, or this freeze, 0.96
00:08:39.600 because it's just trying to buy up goodwill for later on when people then are like, have 0.99
00:08:44.540 their carbon tax doubled.
00:08:45.860 And then he's like, well, and the liberals are also hacks because they don't want to make
00:08:48.860 it permanent.
00:08:49.800 But Jagmeet, why didn't you threaten Trudeau to say, if you do not vote, if you do not
00:08:56.420 vote to make the GST permanent, then I will be voting for the no confidence motion because
00:09:01.100 it's clear that you can't even do the bare minimum.
00:09:03.340 See, guys, I'm not a political genius by any measure. 0.91
00:09:06.640 But I'm not stupid.
00:09:07.980 I'm not Jagmeet Singh. 0.64
00:09:09.180 I could actually probably extract some more value for an ideology I don't even believe
00:09:13.720 in than Jagmeet Singh can.
00:09:15.720 That's actually always, this is a point that actual Justice Warrior and other people have
00:09:20.100 made.
00:09:20.500 Actually, I think it's Ann Coulter's point that he's repeated that the whole accusing anyone 1.00
00:09:25.860 of being a grifter is always a really stupid accusation. 0.98
00:09:29.240 Because if you're getting beaten in a conversation or a debate by a grifter, what does that say about 1.00
00:09:34.360 you?
00:09:34.620 That somebody who doesn't even believe in the things that you believe is able to articulate
00:09:38.740 it better than you, or at least they're arguing from a position that they don't believe in,
00:09:42.440 but they can still hammer you.
00:09:44.520 Jagmeet Singh is just bad at representing the values he believes.
00:09:48.000 Maybe he doesn't even believe them.
00:09:49.160 It doesn't matter, though.
00:09:50.240 He's just ineffective.
00:09:52.220 But here is Shavloy Majumdar.
00:09:54.520 I always say people's full names, and I know what Shavloy Majumdar from the Conservatives
00:09:59.960 reacting to the vote on X, and he says,
00:10:03.020 The Maserati Marxist Jagmeet Singh proves he's only in it for his pension.
00:10:07.780 Once again, refusing to vote no confidence in Justin Trudeau.
00:10:11.020 His words mean nothing.
00:10:12.140 Canadians need a carbon tax election now.
00:10:14.360 And obviously, a lot of this is boilerplate-type political rhetoric, but boilerplate political
00:10:19.480 rhetoric is very effective when it's this easy a layup on Jagmeet Singh.
00:10:23.700 Plus, Maserati Marxist is just a great name. 0.99
00:10:27.320 Here's also exactly why Jagmeet Singh is trying to do this last-minute change on the GST-HST
00:10:34.480 tax holiday, because look at this poll from Angus Reid.
00:10:37.800 This is the question.
00:10:38.760 It says, The GST-HST tax holiday and one-time check are, so that's both the GST-HST tax
00:10:45.100 holiday and the $250 check.
00:10:47.320 84% of people say it is a political maneuver, not genuine help.
00:10:51.320 7% say genuine help, and I guarantee almost all that 7% are liberal voters not wanting
00:10:57.560 to say that their own people's are, you know, their own party is doing cynical political
00:11:01.960 maneuvers.
00:11:02.520 And that's 4,004 people who were polled.
00:11:04.920 That's not a small poll.
00:11:06.860 Here is Michael Cooper from the Conservatives, I think one of the best Conservative MPs right
00:11:11.020 now.
00:11:11.840 One of my favorite MPs, I talked about in my last video, Kevin Vong, but in the Conservative
00:11:17.060 Party only, I would say Michael Cooper is probably in my top five.
00:11:20.140 I like Cooper, Damian Couric, Jamil Giovanni is really impressing me these days.
00:11:25.440 There's Lesley Lewis.
00:11:26.480 I don't consider Polyev part of my favorite MP category because leaders have to do leader 1.00
00:11:31.420 stuff, and oftentimes leaders are supposed to be the bad guy.
00:11:35.440 And so, you know, like, if you rely only on, and I've gotten messages from people saying,
00:11:41.360 Polyev doesn't touch on this enough.
00:11:42.700 Polyev doesn't say enough on this.
00:11:43.760 Well, oftentimes, the leader is kind of like the middle guy in the party who's supposed
00:11:47.880 to balance factions against each other, not against each other, but they're trying to
00:11:51.860 balance the factions.
00:11:53.200 So oftentimes, Polyev might not talk about a bill that you care about, or he might go
00:11:58.000 soft on an issue.
00:11:59.240 But the whole point is to have a critic or an MP who's the attack dog on that issue.
00:12:03.780 So Jamil Giovanni is very much the attack dog when it comes to immigration.
00:12:08.400 There are other people who are the attack dog on defund the CBC.
00:12:12.440 So that's how it tends to work.
00:12:14.100 And I will still say when the Conservatives need to have a better, clear position on issues,
00:12:18.460 I think that the Conservatives need to have a clear position on immigration.
00:12:22.180 Yes, they think that the Liberals are not cutting new permanent residencies and visas enough.
00:12:27.380 That's a good start.
00:12:28.280 We need it lower than what the Liberals have even cut it to, $185,000, $95,000 right now.
00:12:34.840 I think that the immigration rate needs to be cut like 80%. 1.00
00:12:38.280 80% visa reductions, 80% permanent resident reductions, less up, capped, max 100,000 people
00:12:46.300 for the next 10 years with value tests, skill tests, means tests, all that stuff, as well
00:12:51.380 as making sure there's caps on dependents that you can bring along with you.
00:12:54.640 I don't think you get to bring through chain migration, 12 members of your family, many 0.94
00:12:59.040 of them who don't actually are not working age anymore and can't contribute to the tax pool.
00:13:04.140 Anyways, miniature aside, done.
00:13:06.920 Here is Michael Cooper's video reacting to the vote.
00:13:09.840 I thought he does a good job at articulating what's going on here.
00:13:12.660 Jagmeet Singh has demonstrated that his words mean absolutely nothing.
00:13:17.120 I'm standing outside of the House of Commons chamber where moments ago the House of Commons
00:13:21.880 voted on a conservative motion of non-confidence adjusted for those costly and corrupt government.
00:13:28.580 The text of the motion was made up entirely of Singh's own words, including that the Liberals
00:13:34.320 are too weak, too selfish, and too beholden to corporate interest to fight for Canadians.
00:13:39.880 Conservatives agree, but apparently Jagmeet Singh doesn't agree with himself because moments
00:13:44.540 ago Singh and the NDP sold out yet again to Justin Trudeau.
00:13:49.900 I will also add there on what Michael Cooper is saying that the Liberals are beholden to
00:13:59.820 corporate interests.
00:14:00.640 The funny thing is that the Conservatives don't even exactly agree with the NDP on that because
00:14:05.540 in fact, the NDP are actually very much in favor of corporate interests, not only Crown
00:14:10.160 corporations, which they're very in favor of, but they also are absolutely in favor of subsidizing
00:14:16.580 green energy corporations and other basically failed companies that couldn't survive on
00:14:21.420 their own.
00:14:21.860 The NDP are totally fine with that.
00:14:23.180 If you can have a worker angle to any argument, they're totally fine subsidizing anyone.
00:14:28.360 Plus, Jagmeet Singh, for the longest time, wouldn't even include Metro grocery stores in his 0.97
00:14:33.980 criticism of corporate grocery chains because his brother and Calistani idiot, Guritan Singh, 0.97
00:14:40.920 I think that's how you say it, that he was a lobbyist for Metro. 0.99
00:14:45.120 Metro has the largest profit margins of any of the corporate grocery store chains.
00:14:48.880 And guess what?
00:14:49.460 I don't care.
00:14:50.340 They can make whatever money they want.
00:14:51.640 As long as customers aren't being forced to shop there, then it's totally fine with
00:14:55.740 me.
00:14:56.240 I shop at more expensive and less expensive grocery stores.
00:14:59.740 Not one of them has extracted my money from me illegally.
00:15:03.120 Plus, also small grocery store chains tend to actually have higher prices.
00:15:07.720 So it's not always fair to say like, oh, there's price gouging going on.
00:15:11.480 Like, really, the big guys are somehow price gouging with lower margins than the small local
00:15:17.240 place, which, because they do not have the advantage of having a scale of economy, are
00:15:22.620 not price gouging you while they're selling you tomatoes for like seven bucks.
00:15:26.640 But whatever.
00:15:27.520 Maybe I don't know.
00:15:28.440 Maybe I don't know what Jagmeet Singh knows.
00:15:30.320 To come to the rescue and prop up Justin Prudeau's government.
00:15:34.980 And in so doing, Jagmeet Singh sold out workers, sold out Canadians, and sold out his purported
00:15:41.740 principles.
00:15:42.740 Why?
00:15:43.400 Because Jagmeet Singh wants his $2.2 million pension, but he doesn't qualify until next
00:15:49.800 year.
00:15:50.320 So Jagmeet Singh and the NDP have come up with new terms to the NDP Liberal Coalition
00:15:56.380 agreement, and they are that Singh gets his pension, Prudeau gets his power, and Canadians
00:16:03.220 get the bill.
00:16:04.820 Jagmeet Singh.
00:16:06.280 The thing, too, is actually, this is the one thing I disagree with, honestly, everyone
00:16:10.540 on.
00:16:10.940 I don't think that Jagmeet Singh is exactly, I don't think he actually cares about his own
00:16:15.040 pension.
00:16:15.860 One, he's actually still a fairly young man.
00:16:17.920 He still doesn't qualify for his pension, even if he leaves politics for another like
00:16:21.640 decade and a half.
00:16:22.600 He's, you know, in his 40s, I don't think that he cares that much about his personal
00:16:26.880 pension.
00:16:27.320 I think his other MPs care about their pension, and they don't qualify for their pension until
00:16:32.200 October.
00:16:33.240 Singh was elected halfway through 2019, so in late spring, he gets his.
00:16:37.940 So that's really, I think, Singh's motivation on the pension thing, is it's his own MPs want
00:16:42.660 their pensions.
00:16:43.680 But I think he deserves to be thrashed on the pension issue anyways, because Jagmeet Singh won't
00:16:48.140 come out and say what his interests are.
00:16:49.440 But I think his main interest is Jagmeet Singh is, he is like a, he is a bird who likes to
00:16:56.060 collect shiny objects.
00:16:57.920 Jagmeet Singh is just collecting shiny rings and nice little things because he likes attention.
00:17:03.120 Jagmeet Singh's shiny object that he likes is media attention.
00:17:07.440 He loves being on Twitch streams with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar and Hassan Piker,
00:17:14.720 Chang's nephew.
00:17:15.740 He likes to be noticed.
00:17:17.840 He likes to be seen.
00:17:18.680 He likes to be on podcasts and hang out with TikTokers. 0.93
00:17:22.100 Once he's not the MVP leader, who cares what Jagmeet Singh has to say?
00:17:25.960 He's an irrelevant figure like so many other previous NDP leaders.
00:17:30.280 Thomas Mulcair sometimes is talking in the media.
00:17:33.900 Nobody really cares what Thomas Mulcair has to say.
00:17:36.560 And can you name a previous NDP leader other than, like, other than Jack Layton?
00:17:41.620 No, because most NDP leaders are just sanctimonious mouthpieces for public sector unions and not much more.
00:17:49.200 So you don't really have to care who they are.
00:17:51.120 Jagmeet Singh really likes to be seen wearing, like, nice things because it makes him feel fashionable.
00:17:56.680 He is a cocktail party politician.
00:17:59.460 And once he's not the leader, what's the point of inviting Jagmeet Singh to your cocktail party?
00:18:03.500 He's just some random failure of an NDP leader.
00:18:06.580 The only reason he's still NDP leader, let's be very frank about this, is that he's South Asian.
00:18:11.400 That the NDP doesn't want to kick out the first leader wearing a turban from their party.
00:18:15.820 So he gets to lose three times in a row, whereas previous NDP leaders who performed better than him only got to lose one time and they were kicked out.
00:18:24.340 Let's just be frank about that.
00:18:25.720 The NDP are so woke that they can't get rid of a failed party leader because of which community they come from.
00:18:31.420 They have to let him fail multiple times before they can make the argument that maybe he's not very good at his job.
00:18:38.060 Anyways.
00:18:39.940 So that's it for me today, guys.
00:18:42.260 If you want to, again, follow the channel, make sure you're subscribed so you see all the videos.
00:18:46.500 I have my Give, Send, Go legal fund linked in the description below as well as at the top of the comments.
00:18:51.500 And actually at the top of the comments, also insert my Telegram channel.
00:18:54.700 If you guys want to get all the videos in order as they come out and not rely on YouTube throwing it into your feed,
00:19:01.080 then you can just go straight to the Telegram and all the stuff will be posted in order.
00:19:05.160 As well as my website's down there, wyattclaypool.com.
00:19:08.040 If you go on there, you can sign up to my email list, to my contact list.
00:19:12.260 I'm trying to grow a contact list so that in leadership races and nomination races around the country,
00:19:17.000 I can give you my preferred ballot of who I think is the most conservative and professional and effective in order top to bottom
00:19:24.180 so that we can have a greater impact as real conservatives on conservative nomination races.
00:19:30.080 Or else, you're really relying on very scanty information on who you're voting on in these nominations,
00:19:35.980 even though in like 90% of ridings, nominations basically determine who's the MP.
00:19:41.300 And in reality, technically every nomination determines who the MP is going to be because every person who is elected
00:19:47.820 at one point had to run in a nomination race or was appointed by the party leader.
00:19:52.800 So we want to make sure to actually have a greater impact on those things.
00:19:55.980 So sign up there.
00:19:57.260 And as the list grows, I will have a greater ability to actually recommend good people.
00:20:01.520 Right now in Manitoba, there is a PC leadership contestant that I think would make a great leader for the Manitoba PC party.
00:20:08.180 And then in New Brunswick, since Blaine Higgs not only lost the election, but lost his own seat,
00:20:13.560 the PCs in New Brunswick will have to have another leadership election.
00:20:16.680 And there is both a candidate I am encouraging to run for.
00:20:19.420 And if he does run, I will 100% be asking people to sign up who live in New Brunswick.
00:20:24.320 I think that we want very consistent fiscal and social conservatives leading all the parties
00:20:29.520 who are also savvy and aggressive enough that they can actually win elections,
00:20:34.060 not people who just simply are very meek and very unconvincing type messengers on behalf of their policies.
00:20:43.340 We want people who actually know how to play the politics game,
00:20:46.520 but are actually focused on real results that are actually substantial.
00:20:51.020 Anyways, so that's it for me today, guys.
00:20:53.320 Have a good one.