The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - New Numbers Prove Carney's Economic Fraud - Liberals Panic of Bridge FAIL!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.

00:00:06.160 I do not understand the psychology of an online liberal shill. As a partisan commentator who is

00:00:13.640 a conservative, if Pyrapoliev was currently the Prime Minister and doing things I did not like,

00:00:19.640 I would be critical of him. But online liberal shills do not actually care if Prime Minister

00:00:26.020 Mark Carney and the liberals are doing a good job or not. They simply want to try and dunk on

00:00:31.540 conservatives because, heh heh, my guy's in power and your guy isn't. What a life to lead.

00:00:38.700 Check out this post from disgraced former radio show host Dean Blundell saying, cry harder,

00:00:45.320 Maple Mega, over a post that says, Governor of the Bank of Canada, economic indicators suggest

00:00:51.960 that the economy is expanding this quarter at around 2.5%. Now, you might be confused because

00:00:59.360 my setup, I was saying they don't care if Carney's doing a good job or not. And that is true. This has

00:01:05.540 nothing to do with Mark Carney. Dean Blundell promotes Mark Carney all the time, and he attacks

00:01:12.260 Alberta Premier Daniel Smith all the time. The funny thing is that if we do end up achieving

00:01:17.680 2.5% growth in the second quarter of 2026, it will have basically nothing to do with

00:01:24.440 Mark Carney and everything to do with higher resource prices and Alberta Premier Daniel

00:01:29.580 Smith.

00:01:30.440 But first, check out the video here, and then we will be getting into some of the numbers.

00:01:37.360 There, you know, since our last report in April, there have been quite a number of economic

00:01:45.020 indicators.

00:01:46.400 And...

00:01:47.680 Certainly what they're suggesting is the economy is now expanding and the signs as that data have come in have become clearer.

00:01:57.640 You know, for the second quarter, we're estimating growth of about two and a half percent.

00:02:01.860 So where is that coming from?

00:02:04.180 Now, the clip was cut off when you actually start explaining where it's coming from because the details don't make it look very good.

00:02:11.160 Now, is the economy expanding in the second quarter?

00:02:13.720 Yes. I was even predicting the economy would expand in the second quarter.

00:02:17.680 In April, the GDP growth was about 0.5%.

00:02:21.480 In May, it was predicted it was going to be slower.

00:02:24.520 Maybe that's going to be revised a little higher.

00:02:26.900 And then June could be pretty decent with maybe, you know, another half a point, maybe

00:02:32.020 higher growth that would result in a combined 2.5% growth in the second quarter of 2026.

00:02:38.580 Problem is, it's not because we're more productive.

00:02:42.020 Well, the province of Alberta is, but Canada overall is not.

00:02:45.360 it's a combination of higher productivity in a very specific place in Canada, as well as higher

00:02:52.300 resource prices. Yes, the resource prices are mostly benefiting the productivity of Alberta

00:02:58.620 as a province, but also Alberta, with better regulations and taxes than the rest of the

00:03:03.840 country, is attracting a lot of the jobs. Many jobs, leaving Ontario, leaving British Columbia,

00:03:09.720 are not just going to the United States, they're going to Alberta. Anyways, in just a second,

00:03:15.980 I want to show you just how big the sort of portion of new jobs coming out of Alberta is

00:03:23.320 as a portion of the entire Canadian economy. It's absolutely embarrassing. But before I do that,

00:03:27.920 I do just quickly want to let you guys know, speaking of Alberta, if you live in the Alberta

00:03:34.100 provincial riding of Calgary Curry right here on the map in red. I am exploring an opportunity to

00:03:40.880 run there as the UCP nominee for Calgary Curry. So if you live in that riding, sign up on my website

00:03:47.740 at the link pinned to the top of the comments below, wyattclaypool.com. If you want to be on

00:03:53.520 the list, I'll give you a call or an email letting you know about what's going on with that nomination,

00:03:57.920 if I'm going to run or not, and how you can be able to get a membership if you want to support

00:04:02.400 me for that nomination. It is currently held by an NDP MLA Janet Aramanco, who is a massive leftist

00:04:10.200 activist, was a big supporter of injection sites before she got into politics, opposes charter

00:04:15.520 schools, opposes coal mining, basically opposes everything good in this world, and is running for

00:04:20.900 the party led by Nahid Nenshi, who completely destroyed the water infrastructure of Calgary.

00:04:25.640 So there's a ringing endorsement of her. And if you want to help me get rid of her, if you live in

00:04:29.740 those red riding boundaries. See if you can go get a membership and sign up on my website.

00:04:35.220 Anyways, now we will be getting into the Juneau News article that lays out some of the numbers

00:04:40.940 here. Right here from Juneau News from Quinn Patrick, it says Alberta responsible for nearly

00:04:46.660 80% of all new jobs in Canada. This is measuring it over the past year, basically since Prime

00:04:54.000 Minister Mark Carney became Prime Minister. 80%, nearly 80% of all of the jobs created were coming

00:05:01.360 from the province of Alberta, which, as you may know, is not the biggest province, is not the

00:05:07.060 second biggest province, is not the third biggest province. It is the fourth biggest province in the

00:05:12.040 country, and it is driving economic growth, not a plurality of it, the vast majority of it. Let's

00:05:19.280 read a little bit of this, but I'll also be linking this article at the top of the comments

00:05:23.720 below if you want to read the whole thing. Quinn Patrick here writes, Alberta accounted for nearly

00:05:29.260 80% of all jobs created across Canada over the last year, despite being home to only 12% of the

00:05:35.140 country's total population. According to Statistics Canada, Canada's latest jobs report, the province

00:05:40.740 has added 78,500 jobs in the past 12 months. That accounts for the overwhelming majority of the

00:05:48.160 99,000 total that was added across Canada. Now, mind you, that is the net addition. Obviously,

00:05:55.720 other jobs were created elsewhere. But in terms of the net jobs created, taking away the jobs that

00:06:02.560 were lost in each province and balancing it out, that is also kind of pathetic for Mark Carney.

00:06:07.900 The only reason his economy is above water is because of Alberta. He actually got to start

00:06:14.140 in a really good place if you're the prime minister if you become prime minister especially

00:06:19.040 taking over for somebody very unpopular you want to start in a hole because then you look really

00:06:25.160 good simply climbing out of the hole since we were in the hole we have only net gained around

00:06:31.440 99,000 jobs or so whatever that number was right there uh yeah 99,000 jobs since he became prime

00:06:38.000 minister when we were in a hole when it was easier than ever to add jobs because we were simply just

00:06:43.140 recovering the jobs that we used to have. Why do people like this guy? Oh, because, you know,

00:06:49.840 he's not a conservative. Oh, yes, I remember. But Quinn Patrick goes on to say the labor force

00:06:54.500 survey also noted that the vast majority of those jobs were in the private sector. Only 17,500 of

00:07:00.320 the province's 78,500 additional jobs were for public sector positions. And a lot of that is

00:07:06.480 going to be teachers since Danielle Smith had promised several thousand more teachers and

00:07:10.780 teachers' assistance for the Alberta education system in her negotiations with the Alberta

00:07:15.980 Teachers Association. The article then goes on to say, there were 2,677,300 people employed in

00:07:23.880 Alberta as of last month, up 3% from last year, while total unemployment across Canada grew by

00:07:30.340 only 0.5%. Meanwhile, Quebec and British Columbia shed a combined total of 67,000 jobs over the

00:07:39.260 same period. Ontario saw an uptick of roughly 65,000 new hires, but that marked a modest gain

00:07:46.060 of less than 1% of Canada's most populated province. The majority of jobs lost, however,

00:07:52.780 were in the labour sector as the province's construction industry remains stagnant at best.

00:07:58.100 A large reason for Alberta's success is tied to its growing population, as many Canadians have

00:08:02.460 decided to move there in recent years. Calgary has repeatedly been Canada's fastest-growing city,

00:08:07.120 And it's not just simply population has moved here, ergo Alberta is doing better.

00:08:11.780 We are creating jobs because there's jobs that exist here.

00:08:14.480 People are leaving the other provinces because jobs don't exist there.

00:08:18.420 Or at least the jobs that are there are not worth taking because of the extremely high cost of living in places like Quebec and British Columbia.

00:08:27.740 It shows if you just massively cut taxes, good things will happen.

00:08:32.120 Alberta, only province in the entire country with no sales tax. Other provinces should think about

00:08:39.240 it. At least take a few points off your PSTs and see what happens, or your HST or whatever some of

00:08:45.620 the provinces have. I'm just thinking of BC. If you do it, you may see some benefits here.

00:08:50.900 But after reading that, let's go back to some liberal shills on the internet because we need

00:08:56.060 to talk about all these people who are still just coping. They are coping by attacking the

00:09:02.860 conservatives. Here, look at this one. This is from GatorGum, one of my favorite liberal posters

00:09:10.140 on the internet. They say here, imagine typing something like, quote, Candace Brogan, destroyed,

00:09:16.400 it's over, it can't be fixed, and there's no turning back. Then logging off and going about

00:09:21.060 your regular day and enjoying life living in one of the greatest places on earth they they post

00:09:26.760 this s because they hate the government and for clicks and engagement and then continue to live

00:09:31.480 in canada because they know there isn't a better place for them if there was if there was they'd

00:09:37.260 go there truly if you thought that it was bad that it was that bad a great place was available

00:09:42.600 for your family you'd go no hesitation none but they know the truth um one i have never really

00:09:49.160 seen anyone say something that hyperbolic that canada's broken destroyed it's over and it can't

00:09:54.520 be fixed and there's no turning back some people who are like alberta separatists will sometimes

00:09:59.180 speak in that very hyperbolic language but not not that many overall um challenge accepted

00:10:05.580 according to tons and tons of canadians tens of thousands of canadians every year

00:10:10.480 leave the country mostly to go to the united states i'm sorry it does cost a lot to move

00:10:16.600 There are people in Canada too broke to move. But this seems to be a constant refrain of the

00:10:23.500 liberal shills on the internet. The whole idea that, well, if you don't like Canada, why don't

00:10:28.260 you just leave? I'm sorry, didn't any of these people move out of the country when Stephen Harper

00:10:34.820 was prime minister, when they were complaining about him? Well, no, not really. The rates of

00:10:39.020 people leaving Canada were extremely, extremely low around Stephen Harper. And yet they complained

00:10:44.640 about him the entire time when by their own standards they should have just shut up because

00:10:49.880 everything was fantastic except they acted like it was some right-wing hellhole while Stephen

00:10:54.440 Harper was around when everything was objectively far better than it currently is I got to go to

00:11:00.500 another GatorGum post because I really like this guy all their stuff is just really obnoxious

00:11:07.080 so I made this post yesterday promoting the last video I had made and I said Mark Carney and the

00:11:13.380 liberals keep getting humiliated by Donald Trump in exchange for nothing, nothing. And yet liberal

00:11:19.020 shills will still claim things would be worse if Pierre Polyev was prime minister. You will be

00:11:24.480 shocked to hear that I agree with myself. And that is true. He keeps making concessions and we look

00:11:29.780 stupid in front of the Americans. And right on time, a liberal shill gator gum swung by to quote 0.99

00:11:35.500 tweet me to try and dunk on me. And they said, ask yourself why literally none of the right-wing

00:11:40.980 influencers have once commented on how Trump reneged and didn't honor the deal. Not once have

00:11:46.840 they called out the foreign leader trying to cheat Canada. Not once have they called him out for

00:11:51.480 trying to harm Canada. Ask yourself, why do they worship this grifting liar? Okay, apparently they 0.98

00:11:59.860 don't watch the show, although they comment on a lot of what I do. I do say I don't like what Trump

00:12:04.720 did. The play that he made on the Gordie Howe bridge was ridiculous. It was silly. It was bad 0.98

00:12:11.080 faith. Panda paid for the whole bridge. Now he wants a revenue sharing agreement. And Mark Carney

00:12:15.620 gave it to him. All these people are in denial about it. And we're going to get to that in a

00:12:18.780 little bit here of Francois-Philippe Champagne, Canada's finance minister, lying about what the

00:12:23.600 deal says. But I've said all these things. I don't like what Donald Trump did. But guess what?

00:12:29.160 But sitting around saying, I don't like what Donald Trump did, surprisingly, doesn't change anything.

00:12:35.320 You can keep just like in a trance state, keep saying, I don't like what Donald Trump did.

00:12:41.200 I don't like what Donald Trump did.

00:12:42.740 I don't like what Donald Trump did.

00:12:44.120 And if you run to the blinds and you open them up, the tariffs are still there.

00:12:48.440 They are still there.

00:12:49.780 The Gordie Hubbridge deal still sucks if you don't like what Donald Trump did.

00:12:53.600 I always advocate for, OK, I don't like what he did.

00:12:57.240 Now what?

00:12:58.340 Now what is the prime minister of our country who promised he could get us a deal and he's

00:13:02.000 dealt with Donald Trump before going to do about it?

00:13:04.360 And apparently what he's going to do about it, as referenced before, nothing.

00:13:08.800 Make concessions because he's too scared of actually making a full deal with Donald Trump

00:13:12.460 to keep him at arm's length and then sit around doing nothing.

00:13:16.320 But apparently it's a dunk on conservatives because, oh, well, you know, you guys are

00:13:20.800 siding with Donald Trump.

00:13:22.320 No, we're not.

00:13:23.600 No, we're not.

00:13:24.080 I have a healthy respect for who Donald Trump is and is a man.

00:13:27.660 And he does not respect Mark Carney. And I even said that yesterday. And there's all these people coming out there and saying, well, he's too difficult to deal with. Mark Carney is just doing what the only thing he can do, which is sitting around and waiting.

00:13:40.900 Claudia Scheinbaum, the president of Mexico, seems to have no problem with it.

00:13:45.920 There's lots of other world leaders who are getting deals. Oh, but Trump sometimes reneges on elements of the deal and then they change it last minute.

00:13:52.780 Okay, they got a deal, though.

00:13:55.260 Maybe it wasn't everything they wanted to have,

00:13:57.400 but we're not literally sitting in the mud.

00:13:59.280 They're not sitting in the mud like Canada's

00:14:01.200 just waiting for, you know, Trump to swing by

00:14:04.900 with like a zero tariff deal for nothing.

00:14:07.440 Now, I'm not saying I wish we could get it for nothing.

00:14:09.780 We can't.

00:14:10.540 So what are we going to do about it?

00:14:12.220 According to the liberal shills, 0.83

00:14:13.500 we're supposed to sit around complaining

00:14:15.480 at Pierpoliev and the conservatives.

00:14:18.120 That's apparently how you get a deal.

00:14:19.660 uh I need to now jump over I want to jump over to this oh first we got to get to this clip from

00:14:26.920 Laura Babcock's show because of course we do I love her show it's it's inspiring it's fascinating

00:14:33.520 from a psychological perspective and not a good one I love every little bit of it uh so in the

00:14:39.700 midst of Mark Carney caving to Donald Trump and giving him everything he wants in the Gordie

00:14:44.160 bridge situation. Of course, Laura Babcock has this guy to come on to cry and complain about

00:14:50.500 Pierre Polyev. I voted for Carney because of the fact that I watched Pierre for his entire career.

00:14:56.240 Pierre was a very effective attack dog as an opposition member and on the benches.

00:15:00.700 He didn't really hold many portfolios through his time there. Yeah, because he was really young.

00:15:05.440 That's not shocking. I feel it was a mistake ever choosing him to be a leader. He's really stuck in

00:15:10.960 campaign mode as if justin trudeau is the prime minister of canada i voted carney because of

00:15:16.160 experience on the world stage his ability to build bridges everywhere he's gone he's been respected

00:15:23.440 what about with donald trump where's the bridges being built with the americans now that doesn't

00:15:28.480 mean you grovel it means you earn respect there's a certain type of magnetism that leaders have who

00:15:35.120 get who get donald trump's respect and it's not because you have to value his respect or sit around

00:15:40.800 wondering what Donald Trump thinks of us and just like hoping he loves us.

00:15:44.200 You don't have to, you don't even have to make him love you.

00:15:47.220 You have to be willing to fight hard.

00:15:49.260 You have to be willing to demand what you want,

00:15:52.120 be able to be pliable enough that you maybe you will give a concession,

00:15:55.960 but they have to give a concession back. 1.00

00:15:58.480 Claudia Scheinbaum takes Trump on head on and he earned and she earns his 0.98

00:16:03.760 respect for it.

00:16:05.680 Mark Carney does not,

00:16:06.680 but apparently we're all supposed to like Mark Carney because of his experience on the world

00:16:11.280 stage. Well, as prime minister, he's been flip-flopping on every single foreign policy

00:16:16.140 issue he can find. And he's like texting European leaders on his burner phone about how much he

00:16:21.940 doesn't like the Americans. He's like a mean girl in a movie. It is actually funny how much he 0.95

00:16:28.060 reminds me of a high school mean girl. But now let's jump over to a clip from the CBC of

00:16:36.040 Francois-Philippe Champagne, our finance minister, as well as CBC host David Cochran,

00:16:41.920 a day or a couple of days after he got absolutely spanked by Chevrolet Majumdar

00:16:45.980 on this exact same issue on his show, lying once again about what the deal is actually all about,

00:16:51.840 trying to massage the whole thing out for the liberal audience,

00:16:55.140 trying to prevent them from getting buyer's remorse for Mark Carney.

00:16:58.840 I know the prime minister has explained it, that at least on principle as he sees it,

00:17:03.900 that they share the net profits after a certain number of things are paid back operating costs

00:17:08.520 interest during construction all those sorts of things guys that is not net profit know what net

00:17:17.160 profit would be if we paid off the entire bridge and then we start splitting revenues with the

00:17:21.860 state of michigan that's not what we're doing we aren't what we're doing is that like he said

00:17:27.940 we are paying for the maintenance of the bridge we're paying some interest on the construction

00:17:31.260 of the bridge, and then we're splitting revenues after that. That is a revenue splitting with a

00:17:36.000 small amount set aside for maintenance and interest. Then we have to take our small portion

00:17:40.820 of the revenue, and then we have to then put it towards paying off the bridge. Well, all we get

00:17:46.980 to do right now is cover the interest, which is like, you're never actually going to pay off the

00:17:54.120 bridge by just paying interest. So it's not profit sharing, no matter how much Mark Carney,

00:17:59.160 the CBC and his finance minister, Hack, say it. But Bloomberg has a report out where a U.S.

00:18:05.280 official is contradicting that, saying that loan interest and depreciation won't be included in

00:18:09.420 the calculation. So there will actually be more money going to the United States because of fewer

00:18:14.880 deductions on the Canadian side. I don't know if you can resolve this contradiction for us,

00:18:19.140 but you have a dollar amount of just what it is that Canada has agreed to send to the United

00:18:24.420 States, at least in broad strokes, because I know you need to see actual traffic and actual costs

00:18:28.580 to give us precision, but are we talking tens of millions, hundreds of millions?

00:18:32.760 What are we talking about here in this agreement to open the bridge?

00:18:38.120 Well, first of all, I think you were quite right, David,

00:18:40.440 to refer to the comments of the Prime Minister.

00:18:42.680 And you said two words that matter a lot, net profits.

00:18:46.820 That's what we're sharing.

00:18:48.160 And I think these two words are key in the calculation.

00:18:51.460 And I would stand by what the Prime Minister has explained and described to Canadians.

00:18:57.860 He just asked you, but David Cochran doesn't actually care if he answers the question properly

00:19:02.720 or not, because David Cochran is, in fact, a liberal media flack. He asked you about what

00:19:09.840 the American official had said, that it is, in fact, a revenue share, and it isn't even going

00:19:14.220 to cover some of the things that Mark Carney claims it's going to cover. But even if Mark

00:19:17.860 Carney was right, it's still not profit sharing. It still isn't profit sharing. It would be like

00:19:23.180 if you owned a restaurant with somebody and after we paid the rent, we then split the revenues and

00:19:29.880 we call it profit sharing, even though you still have to pay all the staff out of your share of

00:19:34.780 the revenues. That's not profit. There's many more things that still need to be covered by

00:19:39.620 the Canadian side, like the debt for constructing the bridge before we're actually making any net

00:19:45.760 dollars. Apparently, you can be finance minister of Canada. If you're an underachiever, if you

00:19:53.240 haven't done very much with your life, know this. You could be the finance minister of Canada

00:19:58.700 tomorrow. And in fact, you're probably overqualified because you know what actual net

00:20:04.200 profits means. You know that net profits require you to have profited. A real net profit

00:20:12.320 sharing agreement would be Canada fully paying off the bridge and then sharing the revenues after.

00:20:19.720 That would be actual profit. We are not going to profit on this bridge for potentially 80 years

00:20:25.740 because the original timeline for Canada to pay off the bridge, if we took 100% of the tolls,

00:20:32.260 was estimated to be between like 40 and 50 years. Now we're only getting a portion of the toll

00:20:39.180 revenues. Yes, maybe a plurality of them, including the maintenance costs and whatnot.

00:20:44.680 Sure. Or I guess that would be a little more than half. Regardless, though, it's going to take us

00:20:50.180 like 80 years to actually pay this whole thing off. So we haven't profited a single cent until

00:20:56.840 we get to that point. Now we can be abstract about it and say that, well, it's going to increase

00:21:01.260 traffic flows. It's going to increase tax revenues in Canada. And so it may in a more abstract sense

00:21:07.640 have paid itself off maybe in 20 years or 15 years because of the extra flow of goods and services

00:21:14.580 going each way over that bridge because we've increased the capacity of Canadian exports

00:21:19.740 into the state of Michigan. Fair enough. Fair enough. I buy that argument. Regardless still,

00:21:25.880 we still shoved back the timeline. We have still ceded ground in an area that makes us look really

00:21:32.160 symbolically weak. They keep saying, well, the tolls were never going to be that much in the

00:21:36.660 beginning, then how did you not maneuver to get something out of this on the other side?

00:21:43.200 I have to show you something else that was said to me in the aftermath of all this that I found

00:21:48.860 absolutely hilarious. So I said here basically what I said on the show just now. I said this

00:21:55.520 is complete nonsense. It is not net profits from the start. The U.S. is getting any portion of it

00:22:01.820 is not net profits from the start if the U.S. is getting any portion of the money since Canada

00:22:06.220 will not be profiting until the $6.4 billion construction costs are recouped.

00:22:11.500 And, you know, I go on and keep talking there.

00:22:13.480 And then this guy, Marty Levesque, here says,

00:22:16.740 you've read the deal, question mark?

00:22:19.020 Answer, no.

00:22:20.280 Your assertion is not supported by any facts.

00:22:23.420 Now, isn't that a really funny way of arguing this situation?

00:22:29.200 Have you read the deal, Wyatt?

00:22:31.600 I haven't read the deal.

00:22:33.800 Why haven't I read the deal?

00:22:35.080 Is it because Wyatt Claypool is a deeply lazy and lazy man who lacks integrity?

00:22:41.680 Well, I am lazy and I do lack integrity in some ways.

00:22:45.240 But in this case, no, I have an excuse to be lazy and lack integrity because the deal is not out.

00:22:52.740 There is no deal out in the public.

00:22:54.940 Mark Carney is hiding the deal.

00:22:57.240 Isn't that a funny way of operating?

00:23:00.360 Mark Carney can say it's profit sharing.

00:23:02.100 And if I say even by his own description, it isn't profit sharing. A liberal shill, a liberal hack, somebody who needs a new hobby can show up and say, well, you haven't read it, Wyatt. So how do you know Mark Carney's lying? Because he won't show me the document. And I already know what he said. And what he said does not line up with the definition of profit sharing.

00:23:24.640 It's like when we started arguing about technical recession versus a full recession. It's a recession. Profit sharing has a definition. Sharing the profit. If you are still in the hole, you have not made profit yet.

00:23:39.680 but maybe this is just like the government definition of profit if money is simply coming

00:23:44.680 through the door it doesn't matter how much money you burn as you're basically okay as long as money

00:23:52.320 is coming through the door sorry if there's a little internet hiccup there sometimes

00:23:55.780 telus is being annoying to me anyways that should be it for this video guys thank you for all

00:24:02.800 watching make sure to like share subscribe consider hitting the join button and becoming

00:24:07.380 a member of the channel. And of course, again, if you live in the provincial riding of Calgary

00:24:14.540 Curry, consider buying a UCP membership and signing up on my website pinned at the top of

00:24:19.980 the comments below, wyattclaypool.com, because I am exploring a run to run in the riding of Calgary

00:24:27.840 Curry and winning it back from the Naheed Nenshi NDP. It's a tough fight. There were far easier

00:24:34.180 ridings I could have run in. I'm wanting to do this one simply because I actually like sort of

00:24:39.260 these tougher type of riding fights. I've won tough ridings on other people's teams before,

00:24:44.180 and now I'm going to try and put together my own team in order to try and win back this riding for

00:24:50.600 the UCP. Anyways, with all that being said, thank you guys for watching, and I'll see you guys all later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - July 16, 2026

New Numbers Prove Carney's Economic Fraud - Liberals Panic of Bridge FAIL!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript