The media is being more transparent on what the new attack line is going to be on Conservative Party Leader Pierre Polyev. Right now, the fringe left-wing websites are preparing the attacks that the legacy media will soon take on, pretending that this is a big controversy because a bunch of far-left websites said it was a controversy.
00:00:00.000The media is being more transparent on Everon. What the new attack line is going to be on Conservative Party leader Pierre Polyev? Right now, the sort of smaller fringe left-wing websites are preparing the attacks that the legacy media will soon take on and then be able to go after Pierre Polyev on, pretending that this is a big controversy because a bunch of far-left websites said it was a controversy.
00:00:20.120So right now, the website Press Progress, such a vaunted website run by open communists, is going after Polyev because he openly stated in a rally at Richmond Hill in Ontario that he is against gender ideology in schools and thinks that children should not have it being pushed on them in the classroom.
00:00:38.720A eminently reasonable position. 80% of parents, or just 80% of Canadians, I guess, are on board with parental rights, and parental rights, the movement, is predicated on the fact that most parents are not comfortable with their kids being taught gender theory or being pushed on them in the classroom.
00:00:56.740And then if a child is convinced that they should maybe identify as a different gender or something like non-binary, that the parent is not allowed to know if the person, their child, is identifying that way in the classroom.
00:01:08.300It's obviously a violation of the sort of relationship between a parent and the child to have secrets being kept from them in the classroom where basically the teacher is acting almost as a co-parent along with the real parents.
00:01:20.360That's deeply inappropriate, and Pierre Polyev is taking a very reasonable position by opposing this stuff.
00:01:27.140But if you work for somewhere like Press Progress, an organization that has writers who still work there, who openly say that we shouldn't, or they were retweeting stuff saying we shouldn't celebrate Remembrance Day, and instead we should be celebrating the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, these people think this is very bigoted, homophobic, and transphobic.
00:01:45.380Why? Well, it's because Pierre Polyev simply opposes far-left ideology being placed onto children.
00:01:53.160And make no mistake, it's not because he said anything bad about transgender people or gay people.
00:01:58.280Obviously, Pierre Polyev's never said anything close to that.
00:02:01.100They're merely saying that you're bigoted because you don't give in fully to our fringe beliefs.
00:02:06.360That is complete nonsense, and I think Pierre Polyev's going to win this round.
00:02:10.520But this is exactly how the media cycle works.
00:02:21.300They will print an article at a weird fringe website like Press Progress or AntiHate.net or anything like that.
00:02:28.680And then they will use that reporting by people who are obviously very left-wing ideologically.
00:02:34.540They quote their own left-wing sources saying that Pierre Polyev is rude or bigoted or mean because he opposes something that most Canadians oppose.
00:02:43.020And then the CBC, CTV, Global, they'll eventually pick it up and say there's so many people mad at Pierre Polyev's recent comments about gender ideology, even though you cannot find anyone actually online who's outraged, who aren't just in the far-left orbit of Press Progress, AntiHate.com, and like the Walrus or whatever.
00:02:59.740But this is the article, and it says analysis, and it reads, Pierre Polyev under fire after video surfaces of homophobic and transphobic speech.
00:03:07.640And already this is complete nonsense.
00:03:09.680They're making it sound like this was a secret videotape that Pierre Polyev didn't want you to see.
00:03:13.820It was from the Western Standard who uploaded it themselves.
00:03:17.540They commented on his speech basically saying that it's good that he is actually taking it to the gender ideology left and that everyone at the event and even the Conservative Party spokespeople, they didn't apologize for it.
00:03:30.020They basically said, yeah, he said what he said and we stand by it.
00:03:32.820But Press Progress is trying to drum up this idea that there's all these angry people out there, and are you going to be one of the good people who's angry at Pierre Polyev for saying something that's vaguely bigoted, even though we can't prove it is in any way?
00:03:46.700It's just to create faux outrage that then the mainstream media, because a bunch of left-wing outlets said that there was, they can now say there's a bunch of sources out there saying that people are mad at Pierre Polyev, and they're never going to find more than just activists to say that they are.
00:04:00.600Whenever the media says there's outrage about something, it's like five people.
00:04:18.760Even Press Progress, you have to be really specific with the wording on Google to make them even appear in Google News.
00:04:24.600Nobody cares about this story whatsoever.
00:04:26.940And Pierre Polyev, again, is 100% on the side of both families and just basic liberty.
00:04:34.140Whenever people bring up their opposition to parental rights, it's always either based on one or two things.
00:04:39.820Crazy hypotheticals that obviously do not commonly happen, or just the sort of idea that there's fake rights that are being infringed upon.
00:04:48.160So you get a lot of these people saying, well, it's violating the privacy rights of a child not to be able to keep secrets with a teacher about how they're identifying the classroom, or it's somehow violating the sanctity of the classroom for parents to be able to inquire about what is in lesson plans, what's in the curriculum being taught.
00:05:05.980And the same people will say, well, you can just look up what's in the curriculum.
00:05:08.300Like, well, obviously, each teacher has a different lesson plan.
00:05:11.240And as soon as you bring up that, even though they'll smugly say, well, you can just look up what they're teaching, they'll immediately say, well, you're not allowed to know what they're teaching, because that's intrusive, and it's sort of breathing down the neck of a teacher.
00:05:23.040And the vast, vast majority of teachers do not teach gender ideology in the classroom.
00:05:27.400The problem is there's a lot of leeway being given because of the lack of transparency that a teacher who subscribes to that ideology can push it subtly in the classroom or very openly.
00:05:38.040And unless a child tells their parent, it's just never going to get out there.
00:05:41.920And the second thing they do when I say the crazy hypotheticals, and I've even heard this from people who are supposedly conservative, very small group of people in Canada who believe this.
00:05:50.600But they'll say that, well, parental rights is a dog whistle for people wanting to harm or oppress gay kids or something like that, or trans kids.
00:06:01.360It's a fringe hypothetical saying that someone could get harmed if a parent is informed of what's going on in the classroom.
00:06:07.120Now, what do you think is the worst modus operandi going on here?
00:06:11.440That parents should, when they drop off their kids, the shutters come down around the schools and they're not allowed to know what's going on?
00:06:16.660Or is it that parents, there's a one in a million chance that a parent is going to be deeply mean and hurtful to a child who's gay or something like that?
00:06:26.760Obviously, that is not a scenario that commonly happens, and there's already laws to prevent that.
00:06:31.000If you are abusing a child, bullying your own kid, harassing them, there is child services for that.
00:06:37.460But we shouldn't be literally dismantling the parent-child relationship because there is crazy hypotheticals you can bring up, in which case a child could get harmed.
00:06:46.800By that standard, we basically should just give the kids over to the state because, hey, well, a parent could do something at any given time, so why not just have the teachers do it?
00:06:54.560But then you think, well, once a teacher does something to a child, they're bullying a child, they abuse a child, they do something.
00:06:59.060Like, well, should children not be able to go to school?
00:07:03.880And we shouldn't be operating based on these just kind of fringe hypotheticals that because something could happen, there should be more government protections and there should be fewer liberties for families.
00:07:33.800They're the type of people who want to defund the police.
00:07:35.680These are not anyone who anyone would see as a reasonable figure to be commenting on things that Pure Polly says.
00:07:41.520But going down, they just talk about who does all the stuff and who was commenting on it and the Western Standard took it and their spokesperson talked to the Press Progress.
00:07:50.380But down here, they say, Tyler Boyce, executive director of Enchant's network, Canada's largest network for 2SLGBTQI plus organization, that he's worried about the impact of Poly's divisive rhetoric on children in Canadian schools.
00:08:20.680I could throw out random words every single time.
00:08:22.840Like, I oppose bike lanes, obviously, for like normal reasons.
00:08:26.040But if we were starting to throw out hypotheticals about like, well, bike lanes could help thieves who ride bikes get away faster because they have an open area to get onto the road and away from the store they disrupt.
00:08:36.500Maybe that also is not an argument against bike lanes.
00:08:39.160That's a fringe weird hypothetical of some random scenario you constructed to say something's bad.
00:08:49.080I think that is just a way of trying to force people to stop driving their vehicles.
00:08:52.400And it's just government engineering against the way people want to live their lives.
00:08:55.680But whenever I criticize a progressive plan, I don't bring up some one in a million chance of something bad happening to say why you shouldn't have it.
00:09:03.740It has to be a straightforward reason that on the most common scenario, what's the negative outcome?
00:09:13.180The common scenario is what proves something is not good.
00:09:17.620If the common scenario is likely to lead to something bad, then it might be a bad policy.
00:09:24.380But if you have to invent a strange, crazy scenario in order to argue against something, you're just arguing in the sense in favor of it at that point, basically saying I can't really point out anything.
00:10:15.760Everyone's inherently nice to children.
00:10:17.840The problem that parents have is that, well, is it that the specific teacher is suggesting things to my kid and they're absorbing it?
00:10:25.600Because children are very susceptible to suggestions, just how children are.
00:10:29.180So when children are not being allowed to, like, or when there's lack of transparency on sort of how your child acts in the classroom and what the lesson plans of the teacher are,
00:10:39.380that's concerning parents because they're wondering if because of the very left wing ideology of a teacher,
00:10:44.160they're suggesting things to a child and that the child is absorbing it, even though they're not identifying as who they really are.
00:10:50.720They're identifying as interesting things that the professor or not the professor, but the teacher is suggesting that you could be.
00:10:56.940Oh, you could be an opposite gender and children love unique experiences.
00:11:00.020So when you suggest some unique identity that a child could be, there's a chance they might identify as it simply because it's interesting to a child and children are very curious.
00:11:10.440It's just like if you had a super, super far right teacher or whatever, you would probably not want them, like, teaching if they're going to be, like, you know, teaching anarcho-capitalism to the children.
00:11:21.820That's not really something the teacher should be doing. That's really just that's a personal thing for you that it's not needed for a child who's in third grade who should be reading, like, learning, reading, writing, and arithmetic.
00:11:32.520It's fairly dangerous to actually be giving these incredibly high concept, academic concepts to children who cannot understand them and can also not detect guile from the person that's teaching them to understand that this person is trying to get me onto their ideological train or are they legitimately, you know, having some sort of a concern for me?
00:11:52.420Because, frankly, a lot of the gender ideologues, and this is why parents oppose them, it's not that they're, like, trying to be nice to children and see what they identify as and kind of be understanding.
00:12:03.860It's that they actively want children in their class to be trans.
00:12:07.240There's videos from people like places like Libs of TikTok showing this that basically teachers favor those children and they very much do this thing where they put very, poured on attention to a child who's not going to identify as a standard gender.
00:12:20.980And that is obviously a very, very big incentive for a child to sort of act that way at school to get attention from a teacher, knowing that the parents can't do anything about it because they're not, you know, needing to be advised at all about this type of stuff.
00:12:36.300But another thing that Press Progress did is that I don't need to bring this up, but they had another story, a follow-up from this, because, again, it's all about creating false momentum behind the story.
00:12:45.680They say, Richmond Hill deputy mayor apologizes for cheering on Pure Polly's homophobic and transphobic speech.
00:12:51.000Did they prove it was homophobic and transphobic?
00:12:52.840Nah, Press Progress, just in their former article, through their expert, labeled it transphobic and homophobic.
00:12:58.940So now that's part of the narrative that he did give a transphobic and homophobic speech.
00:13:04.880But now they've basically gotten this weakling from Richmond Hill, the deputy mayor, to say, oh, I apologize for all the people approving of what Pure Polly have said because it was transphobic and homophobic because Press Progress put pressure on me to say it was.
00:13:20.080And again, I guarantee in a week's time, you'll have the Toronto Star, the CBC, Global, CTV.
00:13:26.080They'll have op-eds out there talking about how bad Pure Polly have is for trans kids, and he's coming after them, and he's going to put people in danger.
00:13:33.880It's complete nonsense, but this is how you launder a story.
00:13:38.060I'm going to go back from the beginning again.
00:13:40.720But you have a fringe left-wing organization like Press Progress or Anti-Hate put out a couple of articles about a certain subject.
00:13:47.480They quote curated experts who will always say that the conservative is radical.
00:13:51.520They're always going to say that whatever they said was hateful.
00:13:53.540And by doing that, by writing a couple of articles and then ginning up a little outrage on social media, not enough that it actually amounts to anything, that it then gives the CBC license to come over and say, oh, well, look, there's something going on here.
00:14:06.360There's a little bit of outrage out there.
00:14:08.240And they'll cover it from the neutral perspective where they won't say that Pure Polly is transphobic and homophobic.
00:14:13.540They'll just say that people are saying that he's transphobic and homophobic.
00:14:16.360And they'll quote the same expert, quote-unquote, that Press Progress used.
00:14:20.240And then after covering it a couple of times by just saying that there's outrage out there, eventually they'll have an op-ed writer say Pure Polly is dangerous because look at all this coverage of things that people are saying are deeply dangerous.
00:14:33.000And then the article that's supposedly supposed to be neutral again after that op-ed will just say dangerous rhetoric, that Pure Polly is using dangerous rhetoric.
00:14:41.760And the narrative will just become he's using dangerous transphobic rhetoric, even though that's just something that five idiots online said who represent 20% of the population who opposes parental rights.
00:14:53.280And even then, I think half the people who oppose parental rights just don't know what it means.
00:14:57.440And they bought the narrative that it's somehow a big dog whistle to, like, you know, the far right wing and whatever.