The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Poilievre's Rogan Interview throws Liberals into ATTACK MODE!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.

00:00:06.040 At the time that I'm filming this video, I have watched most of but haven't yet finished

00:00:11.200 the Pierre Polyev interview on the Joe Rogan experience, but I do not need to have watched

00:00:17.200 it all yet because today we are going to talk about liberals freaking out about the interview

00:00:22.920 before it was even out. They know that this is going to do good things for Polyev.

00:00:29.180 there's the old saying that you never interrupt an opponent when they're making a mistake.

00:00:34.640 And Polyev is not making a mistake, that is why they are trying to interrupt him.

00:00:39.840 The legacy media and their panels of liberal hacks were trying to spin that this was a bad thing

00:00:44.980 before the interview even came out, because they need to set the narrative to their watchers

00:00:49.360 that Polyev did a bad thing by going to the US and talking about wanting tariffs off of trade with

00:00:56.060 Canada. Like, that's a good thing in my book. And from what I've watched the interview,

00:01:01.820 that's what Polyev did. Now, there's certain parts of the interview that make me cringe a little bit

00:01:06.020 as somebody who watches a lot of Canadian politics. I think a lot of you will know what I mean,

00:01:11.360 where he's kind of referencing stuff that we all know very well. And it kind of feels weird that

00:01:16.280 we're talking about it as if it's some brand new thing like the Apple video. But I get the mission

00:01:21.020 that Polyev was on. He is reaching people who don't really follow Canadian politics all that

00:01:25.980 closely in Canada, but they watch Joe Rogan's show, and so Polyev can kind of reintroduce

00:01:31.480 himself to the set of people who probably only know him from the few viral clips that he's

00:01:36.740 talking about in the interview, and then delivering his platform to them. I think there are some

00:01:41.560 interesting stories in it. Joe Rogan's podcast has never been my thing, but this is a good thing for

00:01:46.940 and that is why we have people like rachel gilmore and people on the cbc and ctv news

00:01:53.560 already trying to naysay the whole thing here was what rachel released yesterday before it was even

00:02:00.160 out this is precisely what's wrong with politicians doing these kinds of interviews with podcasters

00:02:06.600 while rejecting one-on-ones with like actual journalists jagmeet singh leader of the ndp

00:02:11.960 Someone ended up editing her video together with her own interview with Jagmeet Singh 0.61

00:02:19.780 because obviously it's deeply hypocritical.

00:02:21.680 Of course, conservatives cannot go on more conservative-coded podcasts and talk to people. 0.74

00:02:28.040 That's pandering.

00:02:29.460 That's not real journalism.

00:02:31.680 But Rachel Gilmore, who is a supposed journalist, can just gab with Jagmeet Singh and tell him

00:02:37.680 how cool he is on camera, and that's totally fine.

00:02:40.260 joe rogan doesn't even consider himself a journalist so why are we clutching our pearls

00:02:44.100 here rachel shouldn't ever do podcast interviews they can actually be quite compelling hi i'm really

00:02:49.160 excited to do this yeah i'm so glad you're here in my apartment but these are not a replacement

00:02:53.600 for either the politician or the listener for the kind of accountability that you get from an

00:02:58.860 interview with an actual journalist like look at that we're just we're keeping it chill we're super

00:03:04.080 you know you could have told him this is a fancy you could have told him this was a fancy studio

00:03:08.420 it looks really nice because an interview where somebody promises not to ask you about anything

00:03:13.540 that you don't want to talk about yeah that's basically just an advertisement thank you yeah

00:03:18.740 my apartment is a really expensive studio that i pay a lot of money every month for so we can talk

00:03:23.380 about that uh also like what is she even saying i did joe rogan agree to not talk about things

00:03:31.460 that poly of didn't want to talk about like obviously not if anything you could tell that

00:03:36.020 that Pollyov in the interview was always trying to move things back to certain Canadian topics

00:03:40.580 he wanted to talk about. And that's not a bad thing. It's just he's trying to get as much sort

00:03:44.640 of play out of the interview as possible. And if it gets sidetracked onto something that doesn't

00:03:49.020 benefit Pollyov to talk about it, you know, he'll want to move it off of that. You know, so when

00:03:53.580 topics like Trump calling Canada the 51st state came up, you could tell Pollyov was a bit jumpy

00:03:59.360 and wanting to immediately say, yeah, that's bad that he shouldn't do that. You know, Canadians 1.00

00:04:03.640 are proud people. Don't talk about, I think, yes, the 51st state, it's never going to happen.

00:04:09.000 That's actually my one critique of the interview. I understand what Polyev is doing. You don't have

00:04:15.040 to get too jumpy in terms of needing to jump in before someone says something where someone's in

00:04:20.740 a clip, you get a context and pretend that you were laughing along with a 51st state joke.

00:04:24.980 You can still say, yeah, Trump's joking. And the problem is when you're in a two, three week

00:04:30.920 election period, yeah, the media is going to spin every single 51st state joke as being a massive

00:04:37.800 crisis. Yeah, Trump shouldn't do it. But what the people have to understand is the media in Canada

00:04:43.140 is going to play this up as a reason why people need to basically circle the wagons around the

00:04:48.220 current incumbent government. And me as an opposition person is obviously hurt by not

00:04:52.720 having that rally around the flag factor going in my favor. But anyways, let's move on to some of

00:04:59.400 the other reactions to this interview before the interview was even out as i'm going to keep saying

00:05:05.760 here is cbc's power and politics talking about the interview this guy this character joe rogan

00:05:11.360 like rachel points out huge audience massive reach especially among young men in particular

00:05:16.400 but there's a lot of controversial things that have gone down on that show right we've

00:05:20.880 oh my goodness controversial things going down on a podcast hosted by a former mma commentator i

00:05:28.440 think he still does that really the guy who used to host the show fear factor is sometimes saying

00:05:34.560 controversial things and having controversial people on what a what a incisive comment there

00:05:39.900 jp tasker we can remember some of the misinformation that was spread during the pandemic a lot of talk

00:05:45.360 about vaccines and some skepticism reflected on that program quite often he's kind of led a

00:05:50.700 campaign against anti-wokeness you know a lot of uh talk about apparently it's just it's just

00:05:57.060 controversial in some like inherently insinuated to be negative way to be against woke politics

00:06:04.860 like it's very popular to be against woke politics because you know there people don't like it it's

00:06:11.000 bad results but like this the cbc and this is where they show their bias oftentimes they act

00:06:17.380 kind of neutral but it's the kind of insinuations and the premises that they throw out there

00:06:22.780 The premise here is that Joe Rogan is not effectively like a soft liberal politician.

00:06:29.560 And ergo, why did Paulie do this interview?

00:06:32.520 How could he have gone on that man's show?

00:06:35.720 It's a popular show, guys.

00:06:37.280 I don't want to burst your bubble on this one.

00:06:39.080 It's because it's a popular show.

00:06:40.840 Political correctedness, some of the stuff that might not necessarily be, you know, super popular in this country with a large segment of the voting population.

00:06:50.340 What do you make of this decision?

00:06:51.700 I mean, it's a huge gamble, right?

00:06:53.440 I mean, it could be potentially very beneficial to Polyev,

00:06:55.840 maybe give him a little bit of a boost when he's been down.

00:06:58.140 But, you know, he's being associated with someone

00:07:00.300 who is probably out of step with a lot of Canadian voters.

00:07:03.900 That guy's the neutral host of the show.

00:07:07.400 J.P. Tasker there, I believe that's his name.

00:07:09.820 He's like the fill-in host for David Cochran,

00:07:12.340 who's somehow even worse than that.

00:07:14.380 Well, you're the neutral host of the show.

00:07:16.640 And the whole, basically, insinuation here is, you know,

00:07:19.620 Now, Polyev's doing this thing, going on the most popular podcast on the planet.

00:07:24.980 But we all know that Canadians really hate this stuff.

00:07:27.700 And if you're a proper liberal voting Canadian, you're going to have a conniption about this

00:07:32.380 and make a scene about it at dinner if your, you know, 20-year-old son watched it

00:07:37.240 and actually liked Polyev on the podcast.

00:07:39.560 That is the message.

00:07:41.060 Hmm, he said stuff that you're not supposed to like.

00:07:44.760 Like, name one of the instances.

00:07:46.980 Who cares?

00:07:47.600 Has he said probably things that are not correct?

00:07:50.640 Sure.

00:07:51.140 I disagree with Joe Rogan on some stuff.

00:07:53.160 The idea, though, that you're going to have a supposedly neutral host on the CBC 1.00

00:07:57.520 attacking another interviewer is stupid. 1.00

00:08:01.540 Like, he's an interviewer. 1.00

00:08:03.240 He's just somebody who basically sits there and lets anyone just talk to him about anything.

00:08:08.320 That's kind of the thing I actually don't really like Joe Rogan's podcast for.

00:08:11.820 Unless the guest is good, the podcast can kind of be a little bit boring to me.

00:08:16.220 I don't really want to hear about MMA. I don't want to hear Bernie Sanders talking about oligarchs or whatever on the show. If, you know, Ben Shapiro's on the show, I'll watch. If some other guy I like is on the show, I'll watch. You know, Jordan Peterson's on, maybe I'll watch. But that's pretty much it.

00:08:31.680 but let's move on to another show reacting to this we have sharon core on the on ctv news

00:08:39.580 actually i just quickly want to plug the fact that uh my friend here uh the shift has hit the fan

00:08:45.260 i did a really good clipping of this uh i i always rely on other people to do the clipping for me of

00:08:50.900 these kind of interviews or else i would basically not make videos in a day i'd just be too busy

00:08:55.240 waiting through interviews to slowly clip out content but here's sharon core on ctv news also

00:09:01.160 naysaying the podcast before it's even out listen if the goal here was to get him in front of the

00:09:07.580 most number of people to hear his message joe rogan has 15.5 million uh followers on x he has

00:09:14.340 it's the most listened to podcast but all that being said it is the same people that he is already

00:09:20.320 kind that are his base he's not expanding his circle who he's coming to and like just to be

00:09:26.420 clear joe rogan isn't someone who has editorial standards uh he's not a journalist he's a

00:09:30.780 podcaster and doesn't have editorial standards like sharon core here an obvious liberal hack 1.00

00:09:37.780 who mostly i believe writes for the toronto star oh he doesn't have editorial standards

00:09:42.680 shut up it's a fun podcast like i don't know why everyone thinks that has to be like walter 0.70

00:09:48.580 cronkite on or it's not real like oh yeah you went on but the guy wasn't wearing a double-breasted

00:09:54.780 suit and like grew up in like the like eisenhower administration ergo it's not a good interview

00:10:01.040 get out of here whatever like what what is wrong actually i think the person who originally clipped

00:10:07.360 this was vesper digital uh but thanks for posting that shift is at the fan anyways

00:10:11.860 constantly in the past been criticized for a lot of the misinformation he spreads so

00:10:16.420 if there was someone who can pull out a bit of controversy i would say there's going to be a lot

00:10:20.520 of ears and eyes on this podcast because likely we said um it's high risk one small thing off we

00:10:25.920 know people like donald trump listen to this the only thing that is his advantage is that he is

00:10:30.080 not in government he is the opposition leader the president has previously kind of negatively

00:10:34.380 spoken about um mr polyev so there there is risk to his personal brand here but if you were asking

00:10:40.300 me did he get in front of a whole new set of crowds no i already think he's pandering to the

00:10:43.860 same listener group of the joe rogan sales well we'll see i think a lot of people listen to that

00:10:48.000 behind us a million plus oh it's it's high risk i think this is something else that jp tasker said

00:10:53.440 oh it's a high risk thing to do no it isn't it's the biggest podcast in the world you're going to

00:10:59.840 be gabbing with a guy who in fact is kind of a bit of a political conundrum it's not like joe

00:11:05.600 rogan's right wing or left wing he has extremely like i guess eclectic views even in the interview

00:11:12.600 He sounds like an environmentalist compared to Pierre Polyev

00:11:16.340 because he's skeptical about the oil sands in Alberta and whatnot

00:11:20.960 because this is also the thing sometimes I don't enjoy watching Joe Rogan for.

00:11:25.940 He can be very gullible to bad information sometimes,

00:11:29.020 so sometimes the last person who told him something is who he believes on that topic,

00:11:32.580 and if someone's like, it's the tar sands and it's destroying the planet,

00:11:35.960 he'll be like, oh, that's interesting.

00:11:37.800 But the idea that we're going to keep saying,

00:11:39.960 oh, you know, he spread misinformation sometimes. Okay, well, I guarantee you Sharon Kors spread 0.99

00:11:45.960 misinformation. And by her own standard, it's less forgivable because she adheres to journalistic

00:11:53.240 standards and she still fails. She still fails. It's not a high risk at all. The reason I said

00:12:00.480 Polly should not do Joe Rogan or Patrick Bet-David, although I don't think you should do Patrick

00:12:05.900 David at all at any time. But the reason going on Joe Rogan or even someone I like, Ben Shapiro,

00:12:13.400 it wouldn't go on the Ben Shapiro show during the last federal election. Now, I think on the

00:12:19.080 podcast, Polly of Later says, this is a part I haven't watched yet, that I didn't come on any

00:12:24.040 American podcasts during the last federal election. And people are criticizing me for that. But I'm

00:12:28.260 not, I can't leave the country during a federal election. And he tried to cite it as like a law.

00:12:32.940 This is what I've heard. I might be inaccurate. I'm not sure if that's correct. The real reason

00:12:38.020 he wasn't going on their shows is because it would have looked bad at the time. Because we

00:12:42.980 can all say, hey, well, if it's good for him to go on the show now, why can't he do it during

00:12:47.020 the election? That's hypocrisy, Wyatt. It's not. Timing is everything. If you're in an election

00:12:52.700 where anti-American hysteria is driving a lot of votes, probably don't go on an American show.

00:13:00.380 just the facts if mark carney appeared on fox news during the federal election even cnn he would

00:13:07.980 have gotten skewered by people he would have moved people over to the ndp because they're like why are

00:13:12.600 you going on to cnn when you could have gone on to the cbc that would have happened there were

00:13:17.700 less criticism because the media is in the liberals pocket and they will just parrot whatever

00:13:22.480 the liberals want but even people on a line even anyone who saw he went on cnn would have been mad

00:13:28.480 from the hysterical elbows-up camp.

00:13:31.160 Maybe they would have still voted for him,

00:13:32.520 but it would still have an impact.

00:13:34.060 There's a reason why Polly have stuck to Canada.

00:13:36.560 Now, I still thought he should have done people's shows

00:13:38.520 like J.J. McCullough and other Canadian podcasters

00:13:41.420 he didn't appear on the shows of,

00:13:43.280 but, you know, lessons learned.

00:13:45.720 It still wasn't a good idea to do Joe Rogan

00:13:48.060 during the election,

00:13:49.260 but it is now because we're between elections,

00:13:51.260 so any anti-American hysteria

00:13:53.520 that comes out of this interview

00:13:55.740 is going to have worn off within like two weeks.

00:13:58.480 And now Polyev will just be left with the benefits. 0.50

00:14:01.540 And the media knows it.

00:14:02.820 That's why they were attacking even before the thing was out.

00:14:06.120 They had to spin really hard in order to try and like dull the momentum of what is happening here.

00:14:12.720 We have this guy, CBC Watcher, who made this funny comment.

00:14:16.960 He says, on the other hand, CBC's Rafi Bullish, I can't pronounce that last name,

00:14:22.740 sounds downright jealous of the audience numbers that Joe Rogan pulls in.

00:14:26.500 This was after actually that Tasker clip where he was trying to set the stage that Rogan's a controversial guy and this is risky.

00:14:34.660 David, 20 million viewers on YouTube alone for the Joe Rogan experience now.

00:14:41.620 That doesn't include Spotify, Apple, the other platforms he's on.

00:14:46.040 And so, yeah, I mean, if Pierre Poiliev wants to be seen selling that message of defending Canadian workers and trying to patch up with the U.S. despite the ongoing trade disputes, there isn't really a bigger platform than Rogan's for him to do that.

00:15:03.920 I mean, if you think about what Americans might know about the Canadian opposition leader, probably the last time you registered with most of them is when he had that viral moment chewing on that apple while chewing out a reporter, you know, so it has been.

00:15:19.000 He didn't chew out a reporter, by the way.

00:15:20.960 He like actually just asked him basic questions about the premises he was throwing at him.

00:15:25.420 That was it.

00:15:25.940 a while. And Canadian leaders do tend to do this. They do tend to reach out to high visibility

00:15:31.840 American platforms to get their message out there. I mean, Mark Carney launched his liberal

00:15:37.520 leadership, soft launched, I guess, by going on The Daily Show last year. Many of us may not

00:15:42.660 remember that, but that's how that whole thing started and kind of worked out for the guy.

00:15:47.280 And you got to actually, that's a good point that he's making there, that like the media

00:15:51.260 really can't actually criticize this as somehow like a betrayal of Canada that he's going down

00:15:56.880 to the US and talking on an American podcast because Carney did it at the exact same time

00:16:04.000 the tariff crisis was on. He wanted the Daily Show. Now he got away with that because he hadn't

00:16:08.340 actually fully entered politics yet. That was in January before he even announced he was running

00:16:13.080 for the Liberal Party leadership. If he had done even the Daily Show during the federal election

00:16:17.640 period that would have looked bad he went down to new york city to appear on an american show

00:16:22.200 because you don't want to talk to the cbc or something like that uh here is poly of talking

00:16:27.620 specifically about his appearance on the joe rogan podcast and what he uh hoped that he accomplished

00:16:33.180 uh this is him speaking in new york the next day the joe rogan podcast yes why go on now

00:16:40.520 Well, the negotiations are coming up for the USMCA or the CUSMA, as we call it in Canada.

00:16:48.300 I wanted to maximize Canadian leverage going in.

00:16:51.840 And one of the biggest leverage points we have to fight for tariff-free trade, fight for our auto, steel, aluminum and lumber workers is the goodwill of the American people.

00:17:02.820 So I use the podcast to argue in favor of removing those tariffs, not just as great for Canadian workers.

00:17:10.520 but also because it'll make life more affordable for American consumers.

00:17:14.820 How do you think you did on the point of this?

00:17:17.340 We had a great conversation.

00:17:19.740 You know, Joe's a great guy, and my mission was very simple.

00:17:24.520 Fight for Canada.

00:17:25.880 I presented him with a big maple leaf on his kettlebell,

00:17:29.420 which you'll see every time he works out.

00:17:30.900 You'll think of Canadian workers who did the artisanal craftsmanship

00:17:35.580 on that beautiful piece of equipment.

00:17:37.840 and it was a great chance to fight for removing tariffs

00:17:42.540 so that our people can have jobs

00:17:44.660 and we can launch our economy

00:17:46.840 from currently being the weakest in the G7

00:17:49.820 to being the strongest.

00:17:51.400 And this is where Carney is in a weird spot now

00:17:54.680 because Polyev has made a good pivot on trade

00:17:57.700 as of the last month.

00:17:59.660 He has been pivoting away from simply saying,

00:18:02.200 where's the deal?

00:18:03.080 When are you going to get a deal?

00:18:04.120 Because that wasn't playing with Canadians.

00:18:05.780 Now, in theory, it should.

00:18:07.640 Canadians should look at Carney and say, where's the deal?

00:18:10.840 You made this as your only campaign promise.

00:18:13.660 And he can say all day long, I never actually said I was going to get a deal.

00:18:16.520 I said I was going to get the best deal for Canadians and it could take some time.

00:18:20.340 Okay, well, the best deal for Canadians kind of implies it's going to be done, you know, sometime this century.

00:18:25.980 You can't just keep putting it off and saying, well, we haven't reached perfection yet.

00:18:29.780 If that's true, then stop letting perfect be the enemy of good.

00:18:34.700 the thing what poly of is doing now with his pivot towards saying do this try ripping up the china

00:18:41.580 deal to get a better deal with the americans offer this demand this because he's actually making

00:18:47.340 a very like realistic constructive suggestions to the carney liberal government carney is either

00:18:54.460 forced to ignore him and hope that the canadian people don't know what current what poly of is

00:18:58.980 suggesting he do or he has to take the suggestions so as he's not getting a deal signed 0.55

00:19:04.520 And Carney looks really stupid if everyone knows that there's this other guy over here basically saying, why don't you try this? And he's just ignoring him. And so you can't just ignore him anymore. People are going to know he's ignoring him when he's going on Joe Rogan and laying out his trade position, what Canada should be doing. 0.84

00:19:21.120 If anything, Polyev was sunny about Mark Carney on that podcast in a very strategically intelligent way.

00:19:27.880 He even said, I'm not going to attack the prime minister on foreign soil here.

00:19:32.120 I'm going to help him get as best a deal as I can.

00:19:34.740 I text him all of my ideas and what I'm doing and what I'm up to.

00:19:39.000 Now, maybe that's true. Maybe that's not true.

00:19:41.420 It doesn't really matter.

00:19:43.040 The ball is in Carney's court, and I don't think he has the ability to hit it.

00:19:46.840 He can't get a deal signed because he does not want to budge on any of these, you know, big hangups for Trump.

00:19:53.980 He doesn't probably want to actually give Polyev any credit by taking some of his ideas.

00:19:58.140 So he's just going to sit there stagnating harder on the trade issue.

00:20:02.360 You're going to get a lot of business liberals ticked off that Carney hasn't gotten a deal signed.

00:20:07.020 And now he's like waving off or just ignoring Polyev, making pretty intelligent suggestions.

00:20:13.600 Hey, how about we use the new China trade deal, which isn't very good, but at least we can maybe

00:20:18.820 use it constructively by going to Trump saying, hey, how about we will give you this as our

00:20:24.540 concession, we'll cut off the China deal, we can give you maybe another concession here,

00:20:28.900 but our demand is we got to get to zero tariffs and maybe something else.

00:20:32.360 Now you're really negotiating. I've said it in the past videos, Carney isn't negotiating at all.

00:20:37.500 LeBlanc, Joe Lee, and the trade representative for US-Canada trade, I forget, some bureaucrat

00:20:42.760 that Carney appointed, they can't actually negotiate because Carney doesn't let them put

00:20:46.840 any concessions on the table. They can't make any demands. They can't make any suggestions.

00:20:51.200 So, of course, the entire thing just gridlocks harder. I just want to get back to this clip

00:20:55.540 of Polyev, and then we'll move on to a couple other things, and we will be done for today, guys.

00:20:59.700 So the platform is of current interest to you because of tariffs. In the past,

00:21:05.620 you've called the Joe Rogan podcast problematic. So how did you do it?

00:21:10.400 So the journalist there, if you couldn't hear that, is accusing Polyev of having previously said the Joe Rogan podcast was problematic.

00:21:18.540 Nobody said that, guys.

00:21:20.720 Nobody, even I, didn't say the Joe Rogan podcast was, like, too controversial back during the election.

00:21:27.180 It would have been controversial going on to an American podcast, but that wasn't unique to Joe Rogan.

00:21:31.500 It would have been the same if you did Dave Rubin or Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity.

00:21:36.220 You couldn't have done any of it.

00:21:37.180 and so now i would have said maybe patrick bett david or some of these other people i'm not

00:21:42.720 the biggest fans of just because i've watched their content i think it would just be

00:21:45.840 you know poly of having to explain canadian politics to a guy who doesn't know anything

00:21:50.160 for too long but the all the insinuation that poly have somehow like called joe rogan problematic 0.98

00:21:56.060 is just stupid like journalists do not do their homework i haven't done that 0.95

00:22:00.200 would you do it again i don't see why not 1.00

00:22:07.320 so you enjoyed his company i thought we had a great conversation about uh how uh you know

00:22:15.100 the united states would be best served by eliminating all the tariffs so that we can

00:22:20.440 make life safer and more affordable for americans and make paychecks bigger and our economy stronger

00:22:28.840 for canadians can you can you see what the journalist is doing here it's kind of subtle

00:22:33.400 he's asking him things like well you called him problematic at one point but that's not true but

00:22:38.000 i think that he's trying to throw these insinuations out oh so you enjoyed his company

00:22:42.160 oh uh you like hanging out are you gonna do it again it's they want to write the headline

00:22:46.940 controversial podcast like you know here poly of his best friends with controversial podcaster

00:22:53.280 Did you know he said this thing six years ago?

00:22:56.540 That's going to be the run.

00:22:58.100 Wow.

00:22:58.880 Polyev and Joe Rogan are BFFs.

00:23:01.860 They probably touched tummies together at one point because of how, you know, in cahoots they are to take over Canada and let Trump, you know, annex it as the 51st state. 1.00

00:23:10.780 This is going to be the stupid narrative. 0.99

00:23:12.800 They're going to find every clip of Joe Rogan making a Canada joke. 0.98

00:23:16.400 They're going to make every they're going to pull up every clip of him making fun of the Canada 51st state thing.

00:23:21.000 And they're going to be like, oh, my goodness.

00:23:22.040 he enjoys the company of this goblin over here oh can't ever vote for him again oh

00:23:28.220 ah we can't do it we can't do it anymore guys you can't vote for poly because he once went on

00:23:34.740 joe rogan's podcast and joe rogan says stuff i thought overall he did a good interview like i'll

00:23:40.740 just play a quick segment here if you guys haven't seen and obviously watch for yourselves but i

00:23:45.360 thought like overall just the way that he kind of laid out what he wants to do on tariffs was

00:23:51.460 mission accomplished it wasn't like a super special uh sort of performance by polyev it was

00:23:58.200 just on target and so how does the media actually criticize any of this they can't so they're going

00:24:03.640 to have to basically just attack the subject joe rogan and and the tariffs aren't a good idea

00:24:08.940 either we should get the tariffs out because there's so much that we could be doing together

00:24:13.100 as neighbors and partners if we got rid of those tariffs um you know the i think what are the

00:24:19.480 biggest problems in America today. Affordability, security, and we can help with both. We knocked

00:24:25.360 the tariffs down. Let's look at affordability. We have the fourth biggest supply of oil anywhere

00:24:29.820 on earth. You guys pay a huge price discount for our oil because we're effectively, all our

00:24:35.200 infrastructure to ship it is north-south, and it's a very unique heavy oil. So we accept,

00:24:41.740 unfortunately, and for now, a price discount on the oil we send you, which can translate into more

00:24:48.320 jobs and paychecks, but also lower energy prices. You've got $5 a gallon right now in lots of places

00:24:53.440 in America. You're buying, I want to produce more so we can sell 2 million more barrels

00:24:58.700 of Canadian oil into the US market. And then there's housing. You've got huge housing

00:25:04.740 pressures on young people. They can't afford a place to live. We're the biggest supplier of 0.56

00:25:09.660 lumber for home building of any country that imports to the United States, exports to the

00:25:15.220 United States. We've got very low cost, but high quality softwood lumber. We could be shipping

00:25:19.660 or the best truck, the best selling truck in America for 45 years now is the Ford series.

00:25:27.760 It's aluminum. It's a, it's a military grade aluminum body. You guys can't make enough

00:25:34.120 aluminum here. You don't have enough bauxite or electricity to, to convert it. It's completely

00:25:39.060 uncontroversial what he's doing here so much so even a liberal minister the minister of national

00:25:45.300 defense david mcginty actually basically had to agree that there's nothing wrong with what

00:25:50.340 polyev is doing when the media was trying to coax him into criticizing him no no doubt you

00:25:54.900 were going to see the liberal party just as all these liberal journalists and liberal surrogates

00:25:58.900 were attacking him you're going to see the liberal party take a shift but it's so funny on the spot

00:26:03.940 a liberal minister can't really see a problem with any of this and in your view is it helpful

00:26:08.580 that Pierre Polyev is promoting

00:26:10.640 trade with Canada on Joe Rogan's podcast?

00:26:14.480 I'm sorry, I didn't catch the question.

00:26:16.940 In your view, is it helpful

00:26:18.640 that Pierre Polyev is promoting trade

00:26:20.700 with Canada on Joe Rogan's podcast?

00:26:23.800 Promoting trade with Canada?

00:26:25.160 Yeah.

00:26:26.660 I'm not sure I see a downside in promoting

00:26:28.760 trade with Canada.

00:26:31.200 That's really funny.

00:26:32.600 Like, just the straight answer

00:26:34.920 on, do you think the

00:26:36.600 actual substance of what poly of did was bad and a minister is like having to get them to clarify

00:26:42.040 the question because it's about poly of and like do you agree with him doing this is it okay and

00:26:46.840 he's like i i don't know what's actually wrong with it this is exactly what the defense industrial

00:26:51.560 strategy is all about it's about making sure that we invest in our own needs while preparing

00:26:56.520 ourselves for the massive export market let me give you an example if i could just this week we

00:27:02.120 made an announcement for space where we're investing 200 million dollars to help create

00:27:07.240 up to six new launch pads in canso nova scotia why are we doing that 20 of our economy depends on

00:27:14.280 satellites every single day whether you're ordering food to your front door or trading

00:27:18.360 on the stock market and as a result of that we need to make sure we have our own sovereign

00:27:23.960 capabilities our own reliable satellite systems and at the same time it turns out because there's

00:27:30.120 only one launch pad in all of europe there's a huge backlog of countries looking to put satellites

00:27:36.600 into space a two trillion dollar marketplace over the next 10 years canada's going to go forward

00:27:43.480 we're going to make ourselves up the space i don't see a doubt dosha and beyond to put satellites

00:27:50.440 into space so promoting more trade with canada i don't see a downside see so even the liberals you

00:27:57.960 You can actually literally quote them of saying they don't see a downside in what Polyev is doing.

00:28:02.880 There's nothing wrong with the whole thing.

00:28:04.600 Now, I want to bring up one more post by Selin because, of course, Rachel Gilmore, as the podcast is going on after it got released, was like live tweeting through the whole thing.

00:28:15.180 They have nothing on Polyev here.

00:28:17.420 There's really nothing they can take issue with.

00:28:19.540 She is the most left wing journalist and she can really not she cannot really kind of get anything out of it that could actually be spun as controversial.

00:28:28.000 So her right here, Rachel Gilmore, noted journalist, says the boy started talking about crime.

00:28:34.340 And Polyev mentions how there's one guy in particular in Penticton who the police can tell when he is in or out of jail because the crime rate goes up and down when he's out.

00:28:42.900 Quote, just keep him in prison.

00:28:44.640 Polyev laughs.

00:28:45.820 Quote, that seems to be so so simple to solve.

00:28:48.520 Rogan replies.

00:28:49.540 It's like she thinks this is making him look bad.

00:28:54.140 Rachel goes on to quote Rogan again.

00:28:56.320 It says, it's like there's so many of these problems with government that's just like rational thinking, Rogan adds.

00:29:01.960 Exactly, Paulio said.

00:29:03.800 Yes, locking away someone for life without due process and based solely on their past criminal record.

00:29:08.800 Totally rational.

00:29:10.580 Yes, Rachel, you're finally getting it.

00:29:13.420 I know she's being sarcastic, but you're finally getting it.

00:29:17.740 Yes, if somebody keeps committing crimes, their sentence should go up, because they are obviously not capable of rehabilitation.

00:29:28.580 Or at the very least, they should at least be in the timeout box longer, so everyone can have a rest from them.

00:29:34.860 Apparently, you should just be able to keep committing petty crimes all day long, and as long as it's a misdemeanor, we'll just keep giving you a ticket for it.

00:29:42.320 just a ticket, it's fine, just another ticket for that, because, well, we can't judge the fact that

00:29:48.160 he's done it a thousand times before. We have to judge the fact that he's just done a little bit

00:29:52.500 of an oopsie right now. She then goes on to say, folks, I'm losing it. She's literally, I'm going

00:29:59.500 to add, you know that that's going to be part of the thumbnail right now. She is losing it because 1.00

00:30:04.440 poliev and rogan said the most common sense rational thing on crime repeat offenders should

00:30:12.940 not be released into the streets even the carny liberals are having to pivot on this because of

00:30:17.860 trudeau's policy being so bad now they're not doing it enough but even they know this is a big

00:30:22.680 pressure point on them the interview is going to do very well it's already past like a quarter

00:30:27.660 million views in just three hours and if you know anything about youtube usually uh it takes a while

00:30:33.260 if a viewer on the front end of a video as the viewer side of the video if you see it has

00:30:38.760 250 000 views in three hours that probably means on the back end it's already past like one and a

00:30:45.780 half million the views tend to go up on the back end exponentially the front end viewership is just

00:30:52.200 the views that have been verified not to be bots you know bots are really not a big deal on youtube

00:30:56.800 anymore so pretty much all the back end views are real but you're going to have an insane amount of

00:31:01.760 people watching this thing. Not just Canadians, but people around the world, and it's going to

00:31:06.100 do a lot of good stuff for Polyev. That's why the left is already basically trying to step in front

00:31:11.900 of Polyev's interview and start trying to spin why this is bad. Oh, Rogan's controversial. Oh,

00:31:17.360 this is really risky. Oh, should we be going and talking to Americans? Well, Carney does it all

00:31:22.120 the time, so who cares? Anyways, with that all being said, thank you guys for watching. If you

00:31:28.660 like the show make sure to leave a like on it subscribe if you're not yet a subscriber and if

00:31:32.900 you like the show a lot a lot consider hitting the join button and making a monthly financial

00:31:37.880 contribution it really does help keep the channel afloat and allows me to be more resilient in the

00:31:44.200 face of youtube viewership shocks because every once in a while youtube just decides that they

00:31:48.740 are not going to distribute my content basically at all and viewership just falls down a black hole

00:31:54.020 no matter the quality of the videos or what the topic I am talking about is.

00:31:58.840 Anyways, so with all that being said, thank you guys for watching, and I'll see you all later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - March 19, 2026

Poilievre's Rogan Interview throws Liberals into ATTACK MODE!

Episode Stats

People

Summary

Transcript