The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Poilievre slams hypocrisy of Liberal MPs on Jordan Peterson's podcast!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I think a major thing that separates pure Polyev from politicians 0.99

00:00:06.680 like Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh is that Polyev can actually communicate. And I think 1.00

00:00:12.620 this is the main takeaway from the recent episode of Dr. Jordan B. Peterson's podcast he released

00:00:18.080 today with Polyev, is that Polyev can talk about policy in long form. Jagmeet Singh and Justin

00:00:24.520 Trudeau cannot. In fact, my last video was going over Justin Trudeau's interview on This Hour is 22

00:00:31.400 Minutes, which was only four minutes. It was a four-minute interview and Justin Trudeau, even in

00:00:37.000 four minutes, has basically nothing to say. Yes, it's technically a comedy show, but there were

00:00:43.280 actual questions in the interview and Justin Trudeau basically hand waves them away and gives

00:00:48.660 really boilerplate political answers to everything about how we have to stay united and the attacks

00:00:54.340 don't bother me too much. And I've faced tougher situations than this. Also, he has not. I don't

00:00:59.340 think he's ever been 25 points down in the polls. But Polyev, when he's on Peterson's show, he's

00:01:06.380 actually interesting, unlike Jagmeet and Trudeau. Because if Jagmeet was even somewhat of a good

00:01:12.760 communicator, do you really think, as the Liberals have been bleeding out support that the NDP wouldn't

00:01:17.920 have gained if he had the ability to speak like Jack Clayton did? Jagmeet is losing support just as

00:01:23.620 much as Justin Trudeau is losing support. Because every opportunity he has to gain support, it falls

00:01:28.380 through his hands because he's a sanctimonious twit. And Polyev, actually, I find, sells himself

00:01:34.480 short sometimes doing too many slogans. Axe the tax, build the home, stop the crime. I understand the

00:01:40.440 message. It's a good message. But I actually think Polyev needs to lean way more into these podcasts.

00:01:46.900 Donald Trump did it to great effect in the 2024 election cycle. As much as Polyev is a head in the 0.58

00:01:53.620 I don't think he should take his foot off the gas. I think he should be doing more of these

00:01:57.880 interviews. I think it's great for the long run of Canadian politics that young people who tend to

00:02:02.880 consume podcasts see him speak in this manner that actually makes them interested in what's going on

00:02:08.220 in their country. But now I want to highlight this great clip from the interview where Polyev

00:02:13.420 absolutely skewers Liberal MPs for suddenly turning on Justin Trudeau right when the polling starts to show

00:02:20.100 all of them losing their seats. And I think, again, this is a great highlight of Polyev's ability to

00:02:25.900 actually communicate effectively. This is an unscripted interview, and you can tell.

00:02:30.360 By the way, you know, the Liberal media is all saying, well, surely you wouldn't want to

00:02:33.920 trigger an election during the Liberal leadership race. Excuse me, the Canadian people are not obliged,

00:02:41.100 41 million people are not obliged to wait around while this party sorts out its shit.

00:02:45.880 Like, these guys could have got rid of Trudeau a year and a half ago. They knew he was a disaster

00:02:52.540 then. And now they say, well, we're low in the polls, so we have to get rid of him. Now, you didn't

00:02:57.620 care when he was just depriving single mothers of food for their kids or doubling housing costs or

00:03:03.300 unleashing crime in neighborhoods across the country. But now you're really concerned about

00:03:08.560 getting rid of him because your poll numbers are down. You want to keep your job.

00:03:11.860 The funny thing is, a lot of these Liberal MPs didn't even care about winning the election. I

00:03:15.620 think they already knew the writing was on the wall a year and a half ago. But a lot of the people

00:03:19.500 turning on Trudeau now were in what were regarded as safe seats for the Liberals, or at least competitive

00:03:25.180 seats. So they didn't even care that they're only at 24 or 25 points in the polls. But suddenly,

00:03:30.140 they started caring when it's 20 points. Because if they get reelected, even if they're not in

00:03:34.340 government, they still get a pension. Not only do you get your pension after six years of being in

00:03:38.600 government, your pension keeps going up in its value every single year. That's why

00:03:42.860 Polioff himself does have an expensive pension. I honestly don't care. My thing is that if you are

00:03:48.620 a good politician or not. Here's a little bit of a rabbit hole, a little bit of an aside. I think

00:03:56.160 that the claim that somebody's bad because they're a career politician is really stupid. Are they a good

00:04:02.400 politician or are they a bad politician? Career politician is just a cherry on top of the fact

00:04:07.920 that the person sucks in office. If you're a great politician, I think Polioff's a very good

00:04:12.580 conservative politician. I don't care if you're there 50 years. Be there 1,000 years if you're

00:04:17.480 able to keep doing good stuff. It's that if you're not doing anyone any favors at all, you're not helping

00:04:22.840 anybody get ahead in terms of lowering taxes and regulations and slashing immigration, then leave.

00:04:29.640 Then I don't like you being a career politician because you're not even there to actually give over

00:04:34.940 your expertise and getting policy done and making it better and all that stuff. You're just simply

00:04:39.140 warming a seat. But Polioff is not. But the thing is, all these liberal MPs who are just hanging on

00:04:44.080 are just trying to make their pensions worth a couple more, like tens of thousands of dollars per

00:04:49.060 year. Sorry, that's not a good reason to paralyze the entire country in the face, by the way,

00:04:55.840 of a major negotiation with the incoming US president who enters with a massive and powerful mandate

00:05:03.600 and a man who has proven that he can spot weakness from a mile away.

00:05:09.220 And he's absolutely right. Why would we even? Because Trump is going to try and renegotiate

00:05:15.400 our trade deal probably as soon as he gets into office. And we're really going to do that either

00:05:19.940 with Trudeau as the front man or we're going to have a liberal leadership and potentially have Trump

00:05:25.580 wanting to negotiate while the leadership race is going on. And imagine if like Chrystia Freeland

00:05:32.140 became the prime minister and now she's the chief negotiator, even though she did a really

00:05:37.000 meh job the last time and Trump doesn't respect her at all. Again, we don't need to pick our leaders

00:05:43.440 based on who other leaders around the world like. It really is not a priority. But when the person's

00:05:49.460 already bad at their job and the US president hates them, bit of a bad choice. Again, in my last video,

00:05:57.020 I said that Chrystia Freeland is the living embodiment of the color beige, but it's not just

00:06:02.580 her alone. Mark Carney, Anita Anand, Melanie Jolie, Francois-Philippe Champagne, all these people,

00:06:11.040 they are just the color beige. They're all policy wonks who think the more detail that we put in our

00:06:16.280 policies, the more detail in our tax codes, the more little regulatory cutouts that they give out to

00:06:21.460 friends and the more regulations they pass to save the planet, the better things will be. I have a

00:06:27.400 master's degree in public policy. And I bring that up to say that you should never be impressed with

00:06:32.600 anyone who has a master's degree in public policy. You know what that degree taught me is that so many

00:06:38.780 other people in policy are insane. They actually think policy is good as an inherent thing. That sounds

00:06:44.920 like a stupid thing to say. Well, you know, policy is not good or bad. Yes, but you should be scared of

00:06:50.340 people who think that policy is inherently good. These people think that the longer policy becomes,

00:06:55.960 the more detailed it becomes, the better we all will be. They're like communists who believe that

00:07:01.120 if we eventually pass unlimited amounts of regulations, like we'll have a machine that

00:07:05.780 just turns out regulations all day, eventually we will live in a utopia of regulations. It's like

00:07:11.340 the movie Brazil. Everything will take 50,000 forms to complete, but it will be completed right if we do

00:07:17.860 it just the way the government wants. None of these people are going to be good against Polyev. 0.96

00:07:22.180 Going back to the interview, Polyev can actually talk. Let's have another video here. Jagmeet does

00:07:28.200 not do this stuff. Like I know he's played flipping games on Twitch with like AOC and Ilhan Omar,

00:07:35.420 but he doesn't, he's a valley girl when he talks. He talks about the rich CEOs and corporations,

00:07:41.280 and past those buzzwords, he has literally nothing to say because he's orange Trudeau just as,

00:07:48.540 well, he's, yeah, he's like the, he's like a, he's like Trudeau, he's like Sikh Trudeau. Trudeau

00:07:53.920 himself is a very orange liberal leader. He was not at all like Chrétien or Martin who at least

00:07:58.420 kind of respected the free market, but here's Trudeau, Polyev articulating just how bad things have

00:08:04.560 gotten in Canada in terms of actual measurable signs of wellness.

00:08:09.820 I mean, I think housing costs are another one. I mean, there was a study out just 10 days ago that

00:08:16.560 has Toronto and Vancouver now by far the most unaffordable housing markets in North America.

00:08:23.400 And so, you know, housing costs are 50% higher in Toronto than they are in Chicago, even though

00:08:30.640 Chicago workers make 50% more money. The same is true between Vancouver and Seattle. Seattle

00:08:37.720 workers make way more than Vancouver workers, but housing is 60 or 70% more expensive in Vancouver.

00:08:47.360 So on all the measures.

00:08:49.680 Right, so we're making less by a lot.

00:08:51.880 Yes.

00:08:52.040 By a lot.

00:08:52.940 By a lot.

00:08:53.640 Yeah.

00:08:54.140 And we're, and we're paying more.

00:08:55.780 We're paying more by a lot.

00:08:57.620 Right. And most of that's transpired in the last 10 years.

00:09:00.500 Yes. And we're paying the difference by accumulating enormous quantities of debt. Our households are

00:09:07.380 by far the most indebted in the G7. When you take, you divide total household debt by GDP,

00:09:14.340 we now have a bigger stock of household debt than our entire economy. We are more indebted as

00:09:20.680 households than the Americans were right before the 08 financial crisis. And so what we have as a

00:09:28.460 model in Canada is we have artificial scarcity imposed by very heavy and restrictive state

00:09:34.020 confiscatory state that suppresses production. But in order to allow for consumption, we print

00:09:42.760 money and borrow money and then flood the economy with that money.

00:09:47.300 Okay. This is what also gives me hope that Polyev is actually going to do the right things

00:09:51.940 when he gets into government. He doesn't have to go on Peterson's podcast. Yes, Peterson is popular,

00:09:56.580 but it's not like Polyev isn't popular. If anything, two men of equivalent, uh, renown in Canada are

00:10:03.960 talking to each other. Polyev has nothing to gain, but he goes on a podcast like that to actually

00:10:09.200 articulate his ideas around government. And what he keeps saying consistently over time, not just when

00:10:14.380 he's pressed by an interviewer is that we need smaller government. We need rest, less regulations.

00:10:19.760 We need basically less printing of money. We need lower immigration. And so that is what gives me 1.00

00:10:25.580 some hope, even though I can make criticisms of the conservative party and some conservative

00:10:30.460 politicians. Hey guys, I was running for the conservative party nomination in my riding of

00:10:35.740 Calgary Signal Hill and an insider at the top of the party. And this is not Polyev's fault. It's just

00:10:40.560 when the party gets so ahead in the polls, certain people behind the scenes can kind of do what they

00:10:44.860 want without getting too much attention put on them. And I was kicked out of the nomination

00:10:48.180 because they didn't want me to win. There's nothing offensive about me. I think you guys have

00:10:52.120 watched me long enough to know. So I'm saying this not from the perspective of someone who wants

00:10:56.920 to be hired as a staffer or something like that, or I want a nomination. I was objectively disallowed

00:11:02.440 from a nomination, but I think Polyev is doing an extremely good job of actually staying true to form

00:11:08.360 about a small government message. There has not actually been a shift since the leadership race

00:11:13.440 because some people do this. Aaron O'Toole is the best example. I'm a true blue conservative. And then

00:11:19.120 as soon as they're the actual leader and it's coming towards the election, they start going

00:11:22.560 real red, real fast. But in the case of Polyev, he in fact has gotten more conservative since the

00:11:28.980 leadership race. He didn't really talk too much about parental rights and going after gender theory

00:11:33.520 during the leadership race, but he's become more conservative on those issues since then. And I

00:11:38.720 think the podcast and social media ecosystem pushes him to be more conservative because it allows people

00:11:44.880 to go around the mainstream media and give their actual opinions to Polyev directly. And I think

00:11:50.000 that that has been a big benefit in politics in general, even though I have my own criticisms of

00:11:56.000 the way social media operates and the way a lot of people talk on social media. Maybe this is actually

00:12:01.280 a good thing to end this whole thing on because I want to actually, I don't know where else to fit this

00:12:06.240 in. I want to bring up an example of the type of social media stuff I absolutely despise because

00:12:13.520 there's a certain type of personality on social media that I think actually degrades the quality

00:12:18.960 of engagement. There are so many people who, as soon as they get any level of renown online,

00:12:25.440 they get any amount of popularity, they go so Hollywood so fast. And I don't mean Hollywood as in

00:12:32.080 the L.A. institution Hollywood. I'm using it as kind of like, I guess, a descriptive term for just

00:12:37.920 becoming so full of yourself. You think you're a celebrity. And I think this engagement with this

00:12:43.520 guy who's like an American politico was a perfect way of, you know, of summing it up, which Sheree

00:12:49.600 Attiste clipped here. Sheree Attiste is also a fantastic guy to follow. I believe he's only 16,

00:12:54.400 and he puts together a fantastic polling website with his own polling model. And it's very accurate.

00:13:00.240 He's been sometimes the only one to predict races right in Canada. So go follow him, Sheree Attiste,

00:13:05.280 real Albanian patriot on Twitter. He's not actually Albanian. I don't know. I don't even know why that's 0.58

00:13:09.920 his handle. And then he runs the website Polywave. But this guy was just calling out this guy,

00:13:14.640 Red Eagle Politics. And he says, being a rude jerk is no way to attract and retain an audience,

00:13:19.760 even among people ideologically aligned with your angle. I'd suggest that you reflect on how your

00:13:24.640 actions look from the perspective of your audience. And then this guy, Red Eagle Politics,

00:13:29.680 says, well, I'm at 103,000 followers, and you're at 358. So how about you don't lecture me on how to

00:13:37.200 attract and retain an audience? I don't go into McDonald's and tell you how to do your job.

00:13:41.760 Goodness. I have seen actually tons of people in Canadian politics who even do this.

00:13:46.720 They get an audience and they are so much better than you because they have an audience. Their words

00:13:50.960 are wiser. They are smarter than you because they talk into a camera and you don't.

00:13:56.080 Most of the things I say probably doesn't shock you guys. And you probably did not already know

00:14:02.000 what I was talking about. This show, in a certain sense, is entertaining because it's somebody who

00:14:06.640 already agrees with you maybe putting, like, you know, a political perspective in a way that's maybe

00:14:12.080 worth sharing or like, oh, that's a good way of putting it. But there are so many people who,

00:14:16.320 as soon as they get any amount of attention, go so Hollywood, and then they lose their ability to

00:14:21.520 even call out bad behavior on their own side because, ugh, what happens if I want to work

00:14:26.640 with that person in the future? Good example. Viva Frye, who is now a full-time pretend American, 0.99

00:14:32.720 he only talks about American stuff now, he refuses to admit that Candace Owens is anti-Semitic.

00:14:39.040 She's just obviously anti-Semitic. It's so obvious. Follow anything she's doing. Dude, that ISIS terrorist 0.99

00:14:45.040 killed a bunch of people in New Orleans and now she's suddenly saying, hmm, this might be the fault of

00:14:49.680 Israel and the Americans because Israel's influencing America. What? She's an idiot. But Viva will refuse 0.99

00:14:56.240 to call her anything bad. He will still refuse to say that Jeremy McKenzie is an anti-Semite,

00:15:03.280 despite all his ranting about Jews on his show. Because Viva has gotten so Hollywood, he could not

00:15:08.880 actually make a criticism of anyone who has an audience that he might want one day. He even helped

00:15:14.720 make a fundraiser for Jeremy McKenzie when Jeremy McKenzie was claiming he was debanked.

00:15:21.280 He was not debanked. He was kicked out of Scotiabank for abusing staff members and he didn't even attempt

00:15:26.640 to open up another bank account before he had Viva start that fundraiser for him. It's ridiculous.

00:15:32.000 But the thing is then he attacks me because I'm smearing people because I have eyes and ears and I can

00:15:37.440 see the things that Jeremy McKenzie says and I've been telling people about it years beforehand.

00:15:42.400 There are so many shows in Canada that had Jeremy McKenzie on who did not do a single bit of

00:15:48.560 background check on him. I have clips of him mocking Anne Frank for dying, for mocking Jews for getting

00:15:53.760 beaten up in New York City, for saying that Hermann Goering, I think it was like one of the chancellors

00:15:59.520 or whoever, whatever his role was in Nazi Germany, I know he was in the head of the Luftwaffe as well,

00:16:04.800 that he was actually a very sensible man and that he was assassinated to shut him up for saying

00:16:09.680 like sensible things. He wasn't assassinated. He killed himself because he's a coward.

00:16:13.840 But yeah, that's the type of person that is. And somehow Viva Fry is still out there telling me

00:16:18.000 that I'm stupid for saying all this true stuff about Jeremy. But anyways, he's gone Hollywood,

00:16:23.040 so now he only does stuff that gets attention. And attention is the only currency that we are

00:16:27.520 supposed to care about, apparently, in the commentary business. Does my video get a lot of views or does

00:16:33.760 not get a lot of views? So I'll have people put out videos where they will flat out lie about

00:16:39.120 something that happened because it makes for a good thumbnail on a headline. You can always have

00:16:43.600 a little bit of a hyperbolized version of the truth as long as you can deliver on it. If you're

00:16:47.920 putting out videos, let's just be frank, like Mr. Sunshine Baby saying that Trudeau had a meltdown

00:16:52.800 after Trump won his re-election. No, he didn't. He just didn't. I don't like Trudeau as much as the next

00:16:59.440 guy. He didn't have a meltdown during it. If anything, he was artificially sanguine. This is

00:17:03.760 becoming a very random off-base rant. But this is one of those things where I think of it all the

00:17:08.400 time because it annoys me how people end up just becoming click farms, that all their content becomes

00:17:14.080 click farming, all of their social media activity becomes networking to try and get other people to

00:17:18.800 share your stuff. It doesn't matter even if you want to ally with someone because you think they do

00:17:23.680 good work, that's fine. So many people are just trying to get big accounts to notice them and to get

00:17:28.560 people to click on the video, even if their video has no value in it. Not a bit. And it's not like

00:17:34.320 value has to be like original content. Commentary is fine. Good commentary. The pleb does a great job

00:17:40.160 on his show right now. He does a good job. Kat Kanda and Brittany do a really good podcast. You know,

00:17:45.120 people at True North and Rebel News do really good work. Lots, most of them, Northern Perspectives does

00:17:49.680 really good work. But every once in a while, you get the person who is just out for the attention and

00:17:54.080 they actually have no clue what they're talking about at all, which is why they frequently get things wrong.

00:17:58.800 Anyways, and that doesn't mean I won't get things wrong, but I'll attempt not to be deliberately

00:18:03.360 ignorant to whether or not what I'm saying is true or not. Or if Trudeau is going to resign tomorrow,

00:18:08.000 and they're saying that like a year ago, it's like it's not happening, guys. Trudeau is not going to

00:18:11.600 resign. These days, if you say Trudeau might resign in a thumbnail, it's actually kind of plausible these

00:18:17.520 days. But like a year ago when people are doing this, no, you're just lying to your audience and

00:18:21.920 treating them like morons. Anyways, so that's it for me today, guys. Hopefully that wasn't,

00:18:28.160 I didn't take you off by insulting anyone that you like. But subscribe to the show,

00:18:32.880 like this video, leave a comment. I'll try and always read them. Even if I don't respond to

00:18:36.960 people, I always try and scroll through, look through and through all the most recent comments.

00:18:41.040 And if you want to support the show, you can always donate to the legal fund.

00:18:44.640 We're getting close to potentially filing for a Sudbury judgment in this case to get rid of the guy.

00:18:49.280 It's been really stupid. Any bit helps. It's cost me over $34,000 fighting this as of today. And it's

00:18:56.960 over three years old, this case. But anyways, so that's it. See you guys later. And this is truly

00:19:02.480 the last video of the day to not contradict myself like I have in other videos.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - January 03, 2025

Poilievre slams hypocrisy of Liberal MPs on Jordan Peterson's podcast!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript