The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Poilievre Totally Dismantles CTV Interviewer's Liberal talking points!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.

00:00:06.500 One thing we can thank the Canadian Legacy Media for is despite being liberal propagandists,

00:00:13.280 they're also often very bad liberal propagandists. And that's why I want to show you guys this CTV

00:00:20.340 news interview with Conservative Party leader Pierre Polyev. The interviewer here is horrible

00:00:27.380 at trying to push liberal talking points on Polyev, and he easily bats them down time after

00:00:34.300 time to the point where the interviewer seems like she's actually shaking because it's not

00:00:39.120 going very well. I need to make this clear. There is a difference between asking a politician a

00:00:45.500 question from the perspective of their opponents. Your opponent says this, your other opponent says

00:00:51.500 this what do you say that's fine but what so many people in the legacy media do in canada

00:00:59.020 is that they simply push an opponent's talking points usually from the liberals as if it's just

00:01:05.420 the truth and a conservative is offside of the truth you will get an absolute earful of that

00:01:12.940 today in the ctv news interview but it is also entertaining because it is not working at all

00:01:19.500 and it's CTV news but it is not Vashi Capella's which was a big indicator of the lack of quality

00:01:26.800 in the segment but before we get into that CTV news interview I just want to remind you guys

00:01:32.780 if you like the channel make sure to leave a like on the video subscribe if you're not a subscriber

00:01:38.040 hit the notification bell if you want to make sure that YouTube is actually notifying you when one of

00:01:42.700 my videos is out comment what you think about all this and of course join the membership program by

00:01:48.780 hitting the join button below the video if you want to help make the channel more sustainable

00:01:52.880 for me. I appreciate everyone who has become a member so far. It really helps me ride through

00:01:58.320 this terrible YouTube algorithm right now. Anyways, without further ado, I am going to

00:02:03.880 show you clips from this interview. I will be cutting out some of the responses from

00:02:08.320 Pierre Polyev because the interviewer will ask him a question. Sometimes he'll go on for a minute

00:02:13.840 and a half, and we don't need his full response. And I want to mainly focus on the terrible

00:02:20.180 questions from Rene here. Leader, Pierre Polyev. Mr. Polyev, it is great to have you here. Thank

00:02:27.760 you for making yourself available. It's great to be with you, Rene. Thanks for having me.

00:02:31.180 So you want the federal government to lift all taxes from fuel, all federal taxes. Yes.

00:02:37.740 How do you know that the gas companies will pass those savings onto consumers?

00:02:42.700 competition because if one does not pass it on and the other does then the one that does will

00:02:49.660 get all the business now apparently this interviewer doesn't know basic economics

00:02:54.760 what kind of question was that and does the legacy media ask mark carney questions like that

00:03:00.460 mr carney you just took off the 10 cents excise tax on fuel in canada do you think that gas 0.96

00:03:06.860 companies are actually going to lower the prices they never ask him that question one it's asinine 0.62

00:03:12.280 of course, they're going to lower prices. You know, sometimes a company will just pocket the

00:03:17.780 savings they get if the actual savings are too small to really pass on anywhere. But if you're

00:03:23.320 especially passing on 25 cents of savings to the companies by lowering all the taxes, yes,

00:03:29.640 they're obviously going to lower the prices or some of their competition is going to eat their

00:03:34.720 lunch. All of them goes into the competition bureau, making sure stuff like that doesn't

00:03:38.820 happen yeah it would be pretty obvious if you lowered gas prices by 25 cents in theory and the

00:03:45.200 prices did not move there might be some collusion between the companies to not lower it but

00:03:50.240 in no world would that ever happen he then goes into talking about mark carney which i'll show

00:03:56.080 you a little bit here but then i want to jump on to the next question that renee asks we have to

00:04:01.080 make sure the competition bureau is watching there can be no collusion that's the job of the federal

00:04:05.760 government to break up any collusion and prosecute it where it happens. But right now, the biggest

00:04:10.820 gas price gouger is Mark Carney's liberal government. They're raking in money hand over

00:04:17.660 fist because of these higher prices. They collect three taxes, the excise tax, 10 cents. Then there's

00:04:24.980 the new liberal carbon tax, which they call the clean fuel standard, another seven cents. Then

00:04:30.060 the GST, not just on the fuel, but on the other two taxes, a tax on a tax on a tax.

00:04:36.780 So I can now I'm just going to freeze it there because I want to move on to the next question

00:04:41.460 that she asked. But even now with Carney removing the 10 cents excise tax for a temporary period of

00:04:48.500 time, he is still bringing in more revenues for the government than he was before the Iran war.

00:04:56.020 The war in Iran has spiked prices. So even taking off the 10 cents still means that with the clean

00:05:02.680 fuel standard and the GST, he is still bringing in higher amounts of gas tax revenue right now

00:05:09.920 than he was back before the war with all three taxes still applied. Even with just two taxes

00:05:17.180 applied, he's still bringing in more. But of course, he doesn't want to get rid of all the

00:05:20.560 gas taxes right now because that's pure poly's idea. And Mark Carney does not actually like

00:05:24.840 acknowledging fully that Paliyev has good ideas. But now I'm just going to move up to the three

00:05:29.780 minute mark here when she finally gets on to the next question. This one is stupid. Like I can't 1.00

00:05:38.020 describe it any other way. It's just socialistic nonsense. The feds did get rid of the excise 0.99

00:05:45.680 tax on fuel and that includes jet fuel. Yet we have seen airline tickets skyrocketing in prices

00:05:54.080 Is it fiscally responsible to remove all taxes when economists call this a handout to gas companies?

00:06:03.000 That doesn't mean anything. A stupid opinion from economists. What economist is she talking about? Did Karl Marx tell her that? 1.00

00:06:11.440 Would Leon Trotsky swing by and say that he believes that this is a handout to the gas companies?

00:06:17.580 I know that Trotsky is not an economist, but you get my point. Like, what kind of socialist told her that?

00:06:22.140 you know that airline tickets are still going up okay well there's other market forces getting

00:06:29.240 rid of simply the 10 cents excise tax is probably not going to move the ball too much when it comes

00:06:34.500 to airline tickets because that is a completely separate product compared to just buying fuel at

00:06:40.660 the pump also is she just confused that we are going into like vacationing season during the

00:06:47.120 summer and there are more you know ticket prices go up in general maybe she means that like you

00:06:52.560 know 10 months in the future in october the prices are still going up at that point although ticket

00:06:58.620 prices tend to go up as you get closer to dates of flights i don't even know what she's talking

00:07:03.660 about here uh but again like why is this a question for for peer poly if people say that

00:07:09.860 this is a handout to gas companies no it's not no it's not sorry giving people money back from the

00:07:16.340 government that the government not even giving them back money not taking money from people is 0.97

00:07:20.800 not a handout but this is just a stupid leftist talking point to naysay conservative policy but 0.92

00:07:28.700 i'll get to pier polio's response now well first of all the money doesn't belong to the government 0.95

00:07:34.080 uh the reason why mark carney is running such a massive deficit and your question is fair because

00:07:40.240 carney's deficit is twice as big as justin trudeau so we do have to be my let's be clear he's being

00:07:45.820 charitable to say that that was a fair question. It was not. That was not a fair question because

00:07:52.200 she's acting as if he is somehow implying that his views are fiscally irresponsible at the same time

00:07:58.160 that Mark Carney is running an over $80 billion deficit, over $90 billion at this point. I don't

00:08:03.740 even know what it's at. We're also going to spend $90 billion on the Alto high-speed rail line,

00:08:07.940 and that could balloon to $200 billion. We're going to now ask Olive, do you think it's wise

00:08:13.720 to remove other gas taxes when economists are calling it a handout those two thoughts don't 0.99

00:08:20.360 even track fiscally responsible has nothing to do with an economist some moron out there saying oh 0.79

00:08:27.960 it's a handout those two thoughts don't are not do not track and even if you take them separately 0.90

00:08:35.800 no it's not a handout it's in fact letting them keep their money and then is it fiscally responsible

00:08:43.720 i'm sorry like we're who's in government right now blowing out the deficit and we're gonna like

00:08:51.080 you know wag our finger up here probably of here for not being enough of a fiscal hawk

00:08:54.840 like he's not the one who's he's not the one who spent all the money he's not the one who put us

00:08:59.060 in this position mindful of that the reason though is not because taxes are too low he's

00:09:03.920 bringing in more revenue it's because his spending is out of control so he's increased spending by

00:09:10.280 $90 billion above Trudeau era levels. I'm saying cut back on that wasteful spending. Cut back on

00:09:16.360 the $26 billion they're spending on consultants. Cut back on the bureaucracy. Cut back foreign aid.

00:09:22.340 We can't feed our own people. We're sending our money out of Canada. Cut back on the handouts to

00:09:26.900 fake and phony refugees that are getting better benefits than our seniors. Stop the tax havens 1.00

00:09:34.200 like the one that Prime Minister's company uses. You know, I find it interesting. Mark Carney's

00:09:38.740 company, which he still owns, Brookfield, has been called the biggest tax dodger in Canada. 0.95

00:09:45.120 And Carney benefits from that, while single mothers, small businesses, and seniors are

00:09:50.820 forced to pay higher taxes at the pump. I think Mark Carney can afford to pay his taxes.

00:09:56.000 Who can't afford to pay are the people that he has been driving costs on, and that's our consumers.

00:10:03.000 Now, this comment, I actually have to leave the interview for a second, because his later

00:10:06.880 comment there has become now a controversy on social media because apparently renee was supposed

00:10:12.960 to push back on that we have bruce anderson here which it's very telling he runs the awful pollster

00:10:19.040 spark insight that always gives liberals these like crazy plus 17 leads bruce anderson here says

00:10:25.100 when journalists let a statement like this stand that a pm owns this company it's less shocking

00:10:30.440 that many voters believe things that are not true and that pollia feels he can continue with bs

00:10:35.400 statements like this. I had to repair his bad grammar at the end there, but I'm okay with it

00:10:40.240 because my grammar often sucks on social media. And as you can see, other people are freaking out

00:10:44.820 about it. This person, Bill the Beaver, says, Mark Carney has never owned Brookfield, and making

00:10:49.220 such a boneheaded statement is truly pathetic. Even if we assume he's referring to owning shares, 0.81

00:10:54.220 he's purposely framing it in bad faith. He's exactly like his grifting influencers. This is

00:10:59.640 not PM material. This is why he'll never be PM. And this other person says, this interviewer should

00:11:04.420 be fired for not fact-checking. This interviewer is doing terrible liberal propaganda, and it's not

00:11:10.340 good enough because she wasn't going to be enough of a scold to say, like, he doesn't own Brookfield,

00:11:14.740 he just owns shares in Brookfield. Okay, okay. It's still something he should probably disinvest

00:11:21.280 himself from. The amount of entanglement that Brookfield has with government grants, subsidies,

00:11:26.820 and contracts in Canada is truly remarkable. He was the chair that recommended that they move

00:11:32.620 their headquarters from Canada to the United States. And it kind of raises the question of

00:11:38.760 what Pierre Polyev said that they have been, you know, noted in the media before Carney was ever

00:11:43.940 running to be prime minister as being the biggest tax dodgers in the country. Why doesn't Renee and

00:11:50.940 her economist worried about handouts of the gas companies? Go ask Carney why he doesn't take 0.77

00:11:56.280 measures to try and actually hold Brookfield accountable for the taxes that they don't pay,

00:12:00.620 all the ways that they move money around so that they don't actually have to pay any corporate

00:12:05.220 income tax. Now, I think all taxes should be lowered. But if a company should pay its taxes,

00:12:10.280 it should pay its taxes. But again, we're asking stupid, empty questions to the leader of the 1.00

00:12:16.260 opposition on what he feels about economists saying that it would be a handout if he lowered 0.99

00:12:21.440 gas prices even more. And not asking the same questions about Brookfield, it's because they

00:12:26.720 don't care. And anyone watching this, it should be very obvious to you. This is liberal talking

00:12:31.680 points being pushed. This isn't her saying, well, Carney is saying this. They always say sometimes

00:12:35.360 an economist said this or an expert. It's just cover for them to ask a stupid question. It's just 1.00

00:12:41.040 cover for a propaganda question. But anyways, let's get back to this interview.

00:12:46.700 We are expecting the economic update this week. Now, it is expected to post a lower deficit than

00:12:55.720 what was predicted in the November budget. On top of that, the inflow of foreign direct investment

00:13:01.100 over the last year is the most since 2007. And the IMF is forecasting the Canadian economy this

00:13:07.740 year will be the second fastest growing in the G7. I must ask you, with all respect,

00:13:13.140 why do you keep attacking Mark Carney this week and his economic credentials?

00:13:18.360 what kind of question is that and i'm sorry that her i'm sorry that she never was able to take any

00:13:27.140 economics in university if we are the second fastest growing country in the g7

00:13:32.800 that's not a good thing we should be the fastest by far and i'm not saying it's not a good thing

00:13:38.420 because it would actually be better if we were lower obviously it's good to be higher we would

00:13:43.720 be growing faster because we were in the we were in the deepest hole we are bringing back in more

00:13:50.400 foreign direct investment because we were in a hole and some of it is now coming back because

00:13:56.380 we are opening up the floodgates to chinese firms who the americans would not want to work with and 0.90

00:14:02.240 we're going to let them dump money into canada to try and gain influence in our country now that's 0.99

00:14:06.820 not all that a lot of will be coming from elsewhere some of it will be coming from the united states

00:14:10.540 definitely but the thing is that when you've fallen into a pit and you start climbing out

00:14:15.820 we're not she wants him to start clapping for carney and stop criticizing but the the thing

00:14:21.020 she said there at the end is is so choice it's so obvious how about you just lay off him fastest

00:14:28.300 growing in the g7 i must ask you with all respect why do you keep attacking mark carney this week

00:14:35.340 his stop attacking him stop it he's our pm stop it mr pierre stop it mr poliev why do you have

00:14:45.260 to attack him he's amazing he's incredible did you not just hear the out of context economic

00:14:51.200 stats i just said a second ago why do you have to attack why can't you just let him go

00:14:56.300 economic credentials well because they're so bad uh he's been wrong about every single economic

00:15:03.560 issue of the last 10 years. He was wrong to support carbon taxes, wrong to oppose our oil and gas,

00:15:09.400 which he said half of which should stay in the ground. He was wrong to oppose the

00:15:13.000 energy, the Enbridge pipeline to the Pacific. He was wrong to propose money printing,

00:15:19.560 which caused inflation. And in the present, I just have to correct the record on some things.

00:15:24.080 It's fine for the IMF to make projections, but here's the reality.

00:15:27.700 We have the only shrinking economy in the G7 after a year of Mark Carney.

00:15:33.560 We have the worst food price inflation in the G7 after a year of Mark Carney.

00:15:40.280 We have the worst household debt in the G7 after a year of Mark Carney.

00:15:46.080 And we have the worst housing costs in the G7 after a year of Mark Carney.

00:15:50.780 Finally, you say the deficit is lower.

00:15:53.280 With respect, the deficit is twice the size of the one that Justin Trudeau left behind.

00:16:00.480 Trudeau, who was spending outrageously, had a $40 billion deficit.

00:16:04.940 Carney has raised that to well over $70 billion, almost double all the result of increased spending.

00:16:12.360 No one thought it was going to be possible to be more irresponsible than Trudeau.

00:16:16.660 But we found that Mark Carney has succeeded at doing that.

00:16:21.000 And so you've asked me why I'm criticizing Mr. Carney.

00:16:23.540 It's nothing personal.

00:16:24.780 It's just that his results are so terrible.

00:16:27.320 and the canadian people are paying the price through higher inflation and higher taxes with

00:16:32.920 carney it's more more taxes more debt more costs more of the same he's just another liberal now

00:16:42.200 one run for a little bit there because he just started teeing off on that terrible question it

00:16:47.080 is like t-ball out there and she thought she was like somehow having like i guess like this joseph

00:16:53.400 mccarthy moment i forget who said it to joseph mccarthy by the way joseph mccarthy was right

00:16:58.200 about everything but he was trying to have that moment where he's like do you not have

00:17:03.880 is do you not are you incapable of the decency to leave mr carney alone i ask you mr poly have 0.98

00:17:12.040 can you leave this brilliant man to do his work no he sucks oh oh well the deficit's gonna come 0.97

00:17:20.600 in lower than we expected okay well okay what does this mean anything it's way up here and instead of 0.96

00:17:28.520 being way up here it might be a little bit more down there might be a little bit more reasonable

00:17:33.400 would put it like here maybe we only have a 20 or 15 billion dollar deficit that would even still

00:17:38.280 be bad we can have a zero deficit maybe not this year but eventually why don't we have a shrinking

00:17:42.440 one it's way up here but no no no we brought down here guys what why aren't you popping the champagne 0.99

00:17:48.920 for mark carney mr poly of it's so it was such a stupid question such a stupid question set him up 0.98

00:17:56.200 perfectly to just tee off on on mark carney this is why i love bad propaganda because bad propaganda 0.99

00:18:03.720 has the reverse effect i i think poly of should hire this woman as a publicist because she's that 1.00

00:18:09.160 bad to address inflation is uh less government spending over the past few years but at the same 1.00

00:18:15.880 time you are proposing cutting these gas taxes which will increase demand and therefore inflation

00:18:22.680 why no no that no that's not how inflation works there yes do of people more people demanding

00:18:32.520 something will increase the price no doubt no doubt but the thing with fuel is it's kind of

00:18:39.000 a bit of a fixed need people get gas regard no matter what it's not like because gas prices are

00:18:45.480 are high enough that you're like, I'm only going to drive halfway to work today. It's one of those

00:18:49.440 things where you just kind of have to eat the cost. On other things, you can find substitutes.

00:18:53.880 You will stop purchasing it altogether if the price is too high. Not on gas. And if you lowered

00:18:58.660 the price by 25 cents, how many people were like, we're all just going to go on like 50 more road

00:19:03.560 trips and we're going to like bid the price up even higher. Whatever. I don't even care if she

00:19:08.900 only has like a degree in anthropology. Take away her degree. Take it away. Burn it. Burn it in front 1.00

00:19:15.360 of her she doesn't know what she's talking about and she's somehow trying to interview the man who

00:19:19.640 could be prime minister one day should canadians trust your economic he's blown away here for

00:19:25.980 inflation why shouldn't spending over the past few years but at the same time you are proposing

00:19:32.280 cutting these gas taxes which will increase demand and therefore inflation why should

00:19:38.600 canadians trust your economic credentials sorry i don't understand that you're you're framing

00:19:44.920 there. You say that lowering a tax on gas will increase inflation? Increase demand for the gas,

00:19:52.780 which, again, could increase inflation. It's a very, there is called elasticity

00:19:59.260 when it comes to prices. There are certain products that are highly elastic in terms of

00:20:05.160 demand that, you know, if McDonald's French fries go from whatever they are now, like 250,

00:20:12.180 I go to McDonald's way too much. I actually probably could nail the price. I'm a shameful

00:20:16.840 human being. If McDonald's French fries went from $2.50, let's say, to like $7, a lot of people

00:20:26.420 wouldn't buy them. It's a product with a very elastic demand, or it's a more average product

00:20:33.360 for demand. If the price goes way up, people are just not going to buy them. If the price went down,

00:20:37.780 more people would buy them an extremely inelastic good is like fuel you kind of need it uh you know

00:20:45.220 certain food products have elastic demand but food in general there's no price that makes people not

00:20:52.860 buy food and gas is a perfect example because there's only you know you know your standard

00:20:58.500 your your premium plus and you're like you're you know your premium gas and your standard and

00:21:03.780 whatnot, there's a third one or whatever. But like, other than, but usually you have to buy

00:21:09.320 the correct one for your car. It's not like another, there's not like boutique gas that

00:21:14.220 you're no longer going to buy because the price is too high. It's a product that you, even if it

00:21:19.020 hit $3 a liter, everyone's still going to have to buy gas because it's just how it works.

00:21:24.860 Okay. That's an interesting one. I've never heard anyone saying lowering taxes on gas could

00:21:30.360 possibly increase inflation exactly the opposite has happened every time you reduce gas taxes go

00:21:37.140 across the provinces that have done this in alberta in manitoba and in ontario when they

00:21:42.760 reduced gas taxes inflation in those provinces went down next compared to their neighboring

00:21:48.360 provinces but our only way out of this one honestly would be like i'm sorry mr poly if i

00:21:53.900 don't watch the news i i only i only do the news i don't watch the news how would i know any of that

00:21:59.160 I'm busy locked in the studio. You know, I guess, you know, the liberal mindset is that the way that

00:22:05.640 you address inflation is through higher taxes. We've seen how that's worked. Canadians can't

00:22:10.180 afford to eat after a year of the carny liberals and after a decade of this liberal government.

00:22:15.640 They can't afford homes after a decade of this liberal government. So we see that more spending

00:22:21.300 and more taxing by the liberals makes life impossible for hardworking Canadians. They

00:22:27.620 deserve an affordable uh and a prosperous country and that's what conservatives would deliver

00:22:33.380 all right i have to move on to the next question oh do you now oh oh does she oh oh um mr polio

00:22:40.420 oh the fire is dying down i'm gonna go have to get some wood i'm gonna have to sneak out of this

00:22:45.860 question and move on to the next one mr polio really do you uh are you sure at this point in

00:22:53.700 time that your caucus your entire caucus so after you completely gave me a swirly on economics mr

00:23:01.220 paulio are you a bad human being and does your caucus want to throw you out what is this supports

00:23:07.220 your leadership well obviously i have 87 support but i look i know that the liberal establishment

00:23:13.220 and the liberal elites want to talk about my leadership which has which is not in question

00:23:17.780 and has 87% party support instead of talking about the disastrous record of the Kearney Liberals

00:23:24.000 who have doubled food price inflation, who have doubled the deficit,

00:23:29.280 who have unleashed crime and chaos in our communities.

00:23:31.780 And, you know, it would be nice if the media would actually start to ask questions

00:23:35.380 about the government that's in power instead of protecting Mark Kearney

00:23:39.200 and his disastrous and costly record because Canadians deserve a lot better than what they're getting.

00:23:45.940 I wonder when there's going to be an article about how Pierre Polyev is is bullying Renee here. This this feels like a textbook example of something that like the National Observer and Max Fawcett will write a like bleeding heart article about how Pierre Polyev is just, you know, it just was chucked this blonde journalist out a window and then stomped on her body or something like that. He just savaged her by answering the stupid questions she was asking.

00:24:15.940 If four of your members don't have confidence in you as a leader, including the very conservative Marilyn Gladue. 0.99

00:24:24.200 Have you ever asked any of the floor crossers why they left? 0.99

00:24:28.020 Have you ever gotten them to say anything but boilerplate liberal talking points that Mr. Carney is the leader we need right now? 0.98

00:24:35.180 He's a stable leader. He's a unifier. He's doing the things that Canadians want.

00:24:42.940 like ask them why they don't like poly of they none of them will say anything you know chris

00:24:47.720 dontermont every once in a while the first floor across every once in a while tries to take snarky

00:24:51.540 jabs at poly but he never gets specific because i guarantee if he told the story of why he left

00:24:56.840 it wouldn't make him look very good oh i wanted fifteen thousand dollars more to be the deputy

00:25:00.800 speaker doesn't really play that well on television why should canadians well because

00:25:06.000 Marilyn Gladue ultimately got more votes under my leadership because I campaigned on lower taxes

00:25:13.040 and a more affordable life than she ever did under any other leader. She's ultimately made a decision

00:25:19.040 to betray her constituents. And obviously, we're not going to let people who betray their

00:25:24.720 constituents decide who's going to be the leader of the Conservative Party. I'm staying. I'm going

00:25:30.180 to be the leader because I'm the only one who can deliver an affordable, safe, and strong country

00:25:35.600 and I'm going to continue to fight for the people of this country

00:25:38.720 because now more than ever before, they need someone who will fight for them.

00:25:42.560 All right, lastly, I want to talk about the Enbridge approval that happened yesterday,

00:25:47.580 which you are welcoming.

00:25:49.120 I thought that was a really good answer from him.

00:25:51.460 You know, naturally, it's not that difficult of a topic.

00:25:54.960 I thought that was a good way of actually framing it,

00:25:57.160 that, like, who are you going to listen to on my leadership,

00:25:59.440 the people who betrayed their constituents

00:26:00.960 or people from my actual caucus who are saying that they're fine with me?

00:26:04.820 By the way, the insider rumor is that Sarnia Lampton, Marilyn Gladge's riding, is the one that Pierre Polyev is going to run in the next election in, because obviously he will be handing back Battle River Crowfoot to Damian Kirk for the next cycle.

00:26:20.120 And Sarnia Lampton would be very safe for Pierre Polyev to run in, and I think symbolically effective for him to take a run in.

00:26:27.140 It was a fairly fast approval of that pipeline in BC.

00:26:30.880 Can you guys see her shaking now?

00:26:32.600 the last few questions seem to have gotten to her. Now she's going to try and

00:26:37.020 claim that Mark Carney is doing a great job on major projects and energy.

00:26:43.120 Does that now take away a key criticism for you that not a single project has been approved under

00:26:48.440 Carney? No, because this is a very modest expansion of a pre-existing pipeline. It took

00:26:53.260 way too long for Carney to get around to this. This should have been done in weeks,

00:26:57.560 given that it is such a small, roughly a 10% expansion of an existing pipeline.

00:27:02.000 What we actually need is a $30 billion a year oil pipeline to the Pacific.

00:27:09.040 Mr. Carney promised that almost a year ago.

00:27:11.880 Still no permit, no route, no investment, no builder, no starting point, no end point, no starting date, no completion date.

00:27:21.880 And his new special projects office, which was supposed to rush projects through, still hasn't approved a single project.

00:27:27.560 He's kept every single anti-development liberal law and tax that Trudeau brought in.

00:27:33.340 He's kept them all.

00:27:34.700 And in fact, Enbridge says that with these anti-energy laws and taxes,

00:27:39.720 it will be impossible to even produce enough oil to put in a future oil pipeline.

00:27:46.220 So what we need is the liberal government of Mark Carney to get out of the way and grant fast permits.

00:27:51.660 We shouldn't be talking about one gas pipeline for LNG.

00:27:55.940 We should be talking about 18 LNG projects because that's how many were proposed when this liberal government took office.

00:28:03.540 We need to unblock all of that so that we can get our resources to market, boost our economy and paychecks, and make our dollars stronger so that Canadians have more purchasing power.

00:28:14.320 All right.

00:28:14.980 We will have to leave it there.

00:28:16.180 That is our time.

00:28:17.280 Well, she should hope that it's going to be left there.

00:28:19.980 Yeah, so that was really bad.

00:28:21.640 Great for Pierre Polyev.

00:28:22.940 I think that she assumed that she was going to throw a few, like, you know, hooks in there as questions and that he was going to, like, bumble on them.

00:28:30.200 It was going to be a good moment.

00:28:31.160 That was flat out terrible.

00:28:33.480 You know, again, great for Pierre Paulyev.

00:28:35.400 Those were great setups for him inadvertently.

00:28:37.960 Oh, my goodness.

00:28:38.740 When he was talking about how long it's taken Mark Carney to actually, you know, approve new projects, he was mentioned, you know, it's been over a year and blah, blah, blah.

00:28:47.520 I was surprised he didn't stop to explain how long a year is to her, because it seems like you have to explain very basic economic questions to the person who's trying to ask economic questions to politicians, especially accusatory economic questions.

00:29:05.460 Again, I love the moment where she's just like, why won't you just back off of Mark Carney?

00:29:11.040 Why are you criticizing him?

00:29:12.840 Again, trying to have that.

00:29:14.440 Do you have no decency, sir?

00:29:16.800 Why are you attacking Mark Carney? He's gotten borderline nothing done. Why don't you pop the

00:29:23.760 champagne for him, my good sir? Anyways, with all that being said, thank you guys for watching. If

00:29:29.840 you want to become a member of the channel, I would greatly appreciate it. It does help fuel

00:29:33.780 the channel and allow me to grow it, allow me to invest in more tech for it, buy applications,

00:29:41.560 buy equipment. So if you hit the join button below the video, you can make a small contribution per

00:29:46.580 month hopefully um not everyone needs to join obviously if you're a senior on fixed income i

00:29:51.320 always just say do not join i will keep every single thing i do on this channel free so don't

00:29:56.400 bother with all any of that uh but if you do give a few dollars it helps out quite a bit because of

00:30:02.200 how bad the youtube algorithm has been and hopefully i do provide enough daily content

00:30:06.680 that it would be worth i guess a cup of coffee or so every month anyways with all that being said

00:30:12.620 Thank you guys, and I'll see you all next time.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - April 26, 2026

Poilievre Totally Dismantles CTV Interviewer's Liberal talking points!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript