The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Poilievre WON massively with Rogan Appearance - Leftists whine anyways!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.

00:00:06.080 A couple days ago, I made a video going over the media's reactions to Pierre Polyev going on the

00:00:12.600 Joe Rogan Experience podcast before the episode had even come out. And predictably, the media was

00:00:19.280 trying to wishcast this whole thing into a failure before the thing had even been seen. They were

00:00:25.400 talking about how controversial Joe Rogan had been. Oh my goodness, he said things that maybe

00:00:30.100 feminists wouldn't like. Oh goodness, he said something during COVID that we don't like.

00:00:35.000 And talking about how it doesn't even matter if this podcast gets a lot of views, because

00:00:39.200 Polyev is just doubling down on the people who already like him. That was already a stupid take, 0.99

00:00:44.620 because the sort of people who are watching Joe Rogan are not daily political watchers, 0.98

00:00:49.940 and it's good for Polyev to engage with those people, even if most of them may have voted for

00:00:55.080 him in the last election. Although I actually kind of doubt that because the audience that

00:00:59.960 watches Joe Rogan may be the type of person who likes Polyev, but maybe didn't actually show up

00:01:05.720 and cast a ballot for him in the 2025 election. So it is good for Polyev to start appearing on media

00:01:12.400 that those sort of people watch and reinforcing that, okay, yeah, you might like me, you might

00:01:17.020 have liked some of the viral videos, but here's me as a full personality in front of you. Now

00:01:21.840 actually show up and vote for me this time. But in this video, not only do I want to talk a little

00:01:27.380 bit about the media now reversing and saying that it actually was a big success now that it's come

00:01:32.400 out, I want to talk about the people who are still whining about the episode and trying to

00:01:38.300 naysay it to death. It was a success. It has over 2 million views on YouTube. It'll probably hit 3

00:01:44.300 million over the next week. On Spotify, it probably has similar numbers, and the podcast is posted

00:01:49.560 elsewhere. You're not going to be able to pretend that this is a bad thing for Polyev.

00:01:54.100 Polyev and the conservatives were kind of fading into the wallpaper in January and February. Not

00:01:59.360 exactly their fault. Polyev was planning for his convention, which eats up a lot of time. It means

00:02:04.700 he's not really focusing on big national, you know, Canadian political issues. He's focusing on

00:02:09.860 internal party issues, trying to make sure his leadership approval rating is as high as possible

00:02:14.720 at the convention. And at the same time, you had Carney off in Davos getting into little fights

00:02:19.560 with Donald Trump. You had another trade scare. It was a perfect news cycle for Mark Carney. So

00:02:24.940 Carney shot up in the polls and Polly have kind of slid down. Now it's not because Carney, as I

00:02:30.940 mentioned, said in my last video, had like poached a bunch of conservatives. It's most likely in many

00:02:35.660 of these polls, just a response bias. Liberals are super excited and taking the polls very actively

00:02:40.540 and conservatives are a little bit more mellow a little bit more disconnected and they're not

00:02:45.520 really taking the polls as much showing this massive skyrocketing you know rating for the

00:02:50.820 liberals even though objectively they're not doing very well on policy at all and they were just hit

00:02:55.860 by another terrible job report form february but anyways in just a second here i want to take you

00:03:03.120 guys through some of the posts online and some of the interview clips and before i do that i just

00:03:08.360 want to mention to you guys, if you like the show, make sure to leave a like on this video.

00:03:12.580 Subscribe if you are not yet a subscriber. I'm still trying to hit 100,000 subscribers,

00:03:18.360 even though I didn't accomplish my goal at the end of 2025. And of course, if you want to help

00:03:23.280 financially contribute to the channel and make it more sustainable for me, you can always hit

00:03:27.760 the join button below the video. It really does help me be less reliant on the very fickle YouTube

00:03:33.420 algorithm that every once in a while spits me out and I have to go wandering in the desert for three

00:03:38.700 months with very low viewership because they won't show my videos to anyone. Anyways, okay,

00:03:43.500 without further ado, of course we have to start off with Rachel Gilmore. This was when she was

00:03:49.840 still watching the interview, and we're going to get to the video that she made a little bit later

00:03:54.540 in this video whining about it, but here she says, didn't move, opened my computer's camera, 0.71

00:04:00.900 snapped a real-time pic as I forced myself to listen to the Joe Rogan-Polioff interview.

00:04:06.620 And this is just her, I don't know, proving what point. I like how she's like, didn't move,

00:04:13.120 opened my computer's camera, snapped a real-time pic. It's not a real-time picture if you are

00:04:18.280 deliberately opening your computer's camera to take a staged photo of yourself. You're supposed

00:04:25.000 to look at this as someone on the political left in canada and be like oh man oh man that interview

00:04:31.360 must have sucked because rachel gilmore didn't like it yes rachel gilmore didn't like it who 0.98

00:04:38.660 thinks that the liberal party is too far to the right she probably thinks the ndp at times are 0.67

00:04:44.420 too far to the right yes we're all now going to flavor how we see the joe rogan interview with

00:04:50.420 because she snapped a disappointing looking photo of herself okay well i want to move on

00:04:57.820 to another thing now we're going to start off with some of the reactions in the media to what

00:05:04.120 went on here i want to start off with this like i guess this clip of i think it's uh sharon core

00:05:11.180 usually is a writer for the toronto star i believe on ctv news reacting to the interview

00:05:16.580 and it proves my point they know it was a success but there are still some people out there trying

00:05:22.240 to downplay i was shocked chantelle hubert and andrew coin other than the slight snide shot

00:05:28.360 they'll always take it poly of whenever they talk they had to admit it was a good thing it was even

00:05:32.440 a good thing for the country chantelle hubert said but here is sharon core trying to recover it and 0.96

00:05:37.720 explain why this actually isn't that good when you think about it bilateral deal throughout the u.s

00:05:44.260 too in particular about joe rogan's podcast he talked on that for almost two and a half hours

00:05:49.220 uh would not at this point too you know was given an opportunity to be critical of mark carney and

00:05:54.440 and wouldn't go there at multiple different points and was also clear and and felt like you know he

00:05:59.600 did stand up for canada a couple different points in particular about the 51st state to talk what

00:06:04.120 do you make of of his uh of his latest development in his chat with joe rogan you know i was actually

00:06:09.200 quite surprised i've listened to some clips uh of the actual interview and and uh i've talked about

00:06:14.240 this on ctv before now joe rogan's a very controversial figure but he's also someone

00:06:18.240 who has a very large face he's the most listened to podcasts in the world he's got 15.5 million

00:06:23.200 followers on x so he does have an audience whether this audience is going to give pierre a new base

00:06:29.040 i don't think that's the case a lot of people who support no one goes on to a podcast this is always

00:06:35.120 this stupid thing where you'll have people again she's admitting it was a big deal that it was a 0.79

00:06:40.560 it's a it's a podcast with a massive audience and the numbers are in it had a massive viewership 0.97

00:06:45.500 for this particular interview and she acknowledges those things she still has to throw out the

00:06:51.240 controversial comment and then she brings up well he's not getting a new base from this

00:06:55.340 who does a podcast thinking they're going to remake their political base it's about re-engaging

00:07:01.920 conservative voters. It's about gaining momentum. Politics is 90 percent about getting your base

00:07:08.780 out. There's an obsession, especially in more blue liberal red Tory circles, about always trying

00:07:15.220 to reach out to this mythical moderate voter who's not already part of your base and bending your

00:07:20.020 messaging around trying to win them. They're not going to be won. They're not part of your base

00:07:23.880 because they don't want to be part of your base. Get your base out in an election. And then the 0.52

00:07:27.880 other 10 percent of the voters that you need are going to be the people who are going to bandwagon

00:07:31.460 at the end is it looks like you're gonna win and they liked a couple things that you said

00:07:35.220 that's all you need but her idea that like oh my goodness this didn't make him a new base

00:07:40.500 yes it didn't of course it didn't make him a new base this audience is going to give pierre

00:07:45.700 a new base i don't think that's the case a lot of people who support him already are people who pier

00:07:50.740 uh has behind them but what i did find interesting is that he was actually quite disciplined in this

00:07:55.780 interview uh he didn't criticize the prime minister he didn't take on any of the 51st

00:08:00.740 state comments. You know, there was even a comment that Joe Rogan made about Prime Minister Trudeau

00:08:05.260 and who his father was, where Pierre Polyev came and corrected and said, no, you know, his father's

00:08:09.940 not who you're saying. It's actually Pierre Trudeau. So I think it was really good to see him

00:08:14.840 this measured. I think that if he was this measured throughout the campaign previously,

00:08:18.360 he might have seen a different result. This is just the dumbest take on the 2025 election. 0.98

00:08:24.820 I have made an entire video criticizing the way that the conservatives ran the 2025 federal 0.96

00:08:31.060 election. It wasn't because he was too combative that he lost. It's because the liberals were able

00:08:36.820 to define the ballot box question as we are the guys who are going to thumb our nose at Donald

00:08:41.840 Trump and we're going to beat him down and get him to sign a great trade deal with us.

00:08:45.860 That was the Mark Carney pitch. And the conservative pitch became a little bit too much

00:08:51.400 of typical kind of rally rhetoric that Pauli was already using about axe attacks, build the home,

00:08:58.040 save the jobs, blah, blah, blah. I don't know what that was. Stop the crime. And then it became a

00:09:01.940 little bit of too much of, you think you're going to get a deal? Nuh-uh. Now, that's correct.

00:09:08.220 Pauli, sorry, Carney has not gotten a deal signed, but the conservatives didn't offer like

00:09:13.140 a better ballot box reason to vote. It was basically Carney got to set the ballot box

00:09:19.960 question as being about trump and then the conservatives didn't challenge that that is what

00:09:25.360 made the conservatives lose and even her acting like oh man he was really like composed on this

00:09:31.640 podcast i don't believe it what have you ever seen him in another interview be not composed even the

00:09:37.740 things that they try and clip all you have out of context with in other interviews like going after

00:09:42.300 the rcmp leadership pretending he's going after the entire rcmp it's not because he was going off

00:09:47.960 or something like that and his hair was flopping around and he's like screaming about something

00:09:52.040 that he shouldn't be he's always been like this that's the thing if anything in the joe rogan

00:09:58.180 interview i think that poly of at a few moments was too guarded joe rogan's making a joke about

00:10:03.200 poly of his dad being fidel castro yeah we all know it's not actually true let him joke about

00:10:07.700 it a little bit joke about how yeah their resemblance is really uncanny and it's funny

00:10:12.400 but you know you know pure trudeau is his dad and paul and he was controversial in his own right

00:10:16.840 you can always snake back to it i don't think that polyam had to be like oh no no no no that's

00:10:20.920 not his dad you let the joke play out for 15 seconds then you can be like yeah his real dad

00:10:25.720 is is pure trudeau but it is funny how close they look together you know blah blah blah and then in

00:10:31.880 with for another like example uh the 51st state stuff you know i think he handled that one the

00:10:38.380 best of kind of letting the absurdity of it play out a little bit for a few seconds but then he

00:10:43.900 He kept very rigidly saying, oh, no, we're not going to be the 51st state. 0.98

00:10:48.220 Those are foolish comments, all that stuff. 0.94

00:10:50.180 It's like, okay, I get why you're saying this, 0.98

00:10:52.880 but sometimes he would jump in a little bit too fast.

00:10:54.880 That's my critique on the interview.

00:10:56.700 Past that, it's fine.

00:10:57.720 A couple moments where he didn't have to rush in and say,

00:11:01.660 no, no, no, that's not my position, or no, no, no, he's not Fidel Castro's son.

00:11:06.320 A little bit more composed on those,

00:11:09.320 but what Sharon Korr here is just saying is just completely wrong about it.

00:11:12.560 it is helping him because guess what it's getting the base re-engaged your base isn't just engaged

00:11:18.700 all the time you don't just win a type of voter and 100 of them show up the type of grow people

00:11:24.320 who would watch the joe rogan experience every day they probably don't vote at high rates maybe

00:11:30.680 50 but you want those people showing up at 70 80 in order to win election this is why i always say

00:11:37.240 about pro-life voters the party is always like well evangelical christians already vote for us

00:11:41.720 Okay, but if you take a small pro-life stance, if you take a very rigid anti-made stance of saying we're not giving it to anyone with mental illnesses, you have to, it's very restrictive on how you can access it, or maybe even having some soft pro-life policy about saying the government's not going to pay for it or whatever.

00:12:00.320 You would have evangelicals go from turning out at 75% rates to like 85% rates, and that's hundreds of votes extra in every riding.

00:12:08.280 You always have to think about turnout rates.

00:12:09.960 But the question for a lot of people is, which version of Pierre Polyev are you going to get?

00:12:13.940 And I think he surprised a lot of people in the Joe Rogan interview by staying measured.

00:12:18.340 Certainly interesting to see. 0.67

00:12:20.240 But again, that's just complete nonsense.

00:12:22.240 There's no like unmeasured Polyev.

00:12:24.440 Again, in 2025, in the election, you could argue he was too measured, too on script.

00:12:29.760 And that made it easier for Mark Carney to maneuver around him and make the election more about himself versus Donald Trump.

00:12:36.700 when Polyev should have been making the issues about something completely different.

00:12:40.920 Now, I want to go over here to a CBC interview that happened after it was released.

00:12:45.940 This is the one where Chantal Hubert and Andrew Coyne actually were quite complimentary to Polyev's performance.

00:12:51.960 But then we have Aliyah Raj here doing the same thing that Sharon Kaur did. 0.95

00:12:55.920 I'm trying to downplay the success.

00:12:57.500 So it's not actually that big of a deal.

00:13:00.140 In fact, remember, he was on with controversial figure Joe Rogan.

00:13:04.200 And that means that, like, you know, this is what you should question Polyev's judgment on going on.

00:13:09.080 Conspiracy theory.

00:13:09.860 Polyev and his people. 0.99

00:13:10.740 Althea, I want to lean in on this idea of the taking the bait.

00:13:15.940 I mean, Joe Rogan is somebody who has no problem with the conspiracy theory.

00:13:20.080 Polyev and his people would have known this.

00:13:21.860 Andrew references the part where Rogan at one point says, oh, well, Fidel Castro isn't he, Justin Trudeau's dad.

00:13:26.660 And Polyev really shuts that down, says, you know, not true.

00:13:30.240 I don't believe that's true.

00:13:31.340 How much of a risk, though, was Polyev facing going into something, knowing that the host could kind of take this any which way and certainly into things that don't have a lot of basis behind them?

00:13:43.280 Yeah, I mean, it's always a risk going into a theater where you're not sure where the host is going to take the conversation, where the host has already in the past been accused of anti-LGBTQ comments, of racist comments.

00:13:56.220 someone who trumpeted Trump's, his support for Donald Trump, who had Elon Musk on his show.

00:14:04.520 But is Elon Musk that controversial of a figure that that it requires mention that, you know,

00:14:10.320 that Elon Musk, the richest man on the planet on Joe Rogan's show? My goodness.

00:14:15.360 I mean, the conversation was pretty tame. You could see that Pierre Polyev was nervous right

00:14:22.460 off the get-go. And it's kind of odd, frankly, because most of us don't see Pierre Poiliev

00:14:27.500 being nervous all that often. But the conversation, I don't think accomplished necessarily

00:14:33.240 what Pierre Poiliev initially suggested Thursday morning he was setting out to do. Like, I don't

00:14:39.060 think the listener came away thinking, ah, this is why we need free trade with Canada. I do agree

00:14:45.400 with both of my colleagues, though, is that... Sorry, what podcast appearance, even on like

00:14:49.740 an economic-based podcast would like actually accomplish that goal that goal is accomplished

00:14:55.520 through like small change like small kind of comments over time over time reinforcing that

00:15:01.780 Canada you know what U.S. are better together when we have free trade and we can team up against China 0.62

00:15:06.600 and we can make sure that we kind of insulate the western world from you know eastern dictatorships

00:15:12.140 and whatnot like what like you're oh he didn't achieve his goal was his goal like he was gonna

00:15:18.200 to get America to change its mind on tariffs overnight because he was going on the Joe Rogan

00:15:23.140 experience. That's the thing is like, again, it's changing the goalposts because Aliyah Raj is so

00:15:28.160 left-wing, so pro-liberal that she cannot just give the victory to Polyev. Even I, I don't think

00:15:35.680 that what Carney said during the Davos speech was good, but I can admit now it got him a lot of play

00:15:41.860 in a backwards way, not good for the country, but it was good for him because he got to get into

00:15:46.520 another fight with Donald Trump. It makes us look pathetic, but it did help him. But now Aliyah Raj 0.97

00:15:51.920 does not want to just say it was good. Pierre Poiliev presented a very sympathetic face to

00:15:58.060 Canada. He talked about, you know, the need for Canada and the U.S. to work together, that we have

00:16:03.260 all these critical minerals that the Americans need as well, for example. He talked about our

00:16:06.920 natural resources as an angle to help the United States on the affordability issue. But mostly it

00:16:12.180 was a conversation where Pierre Polyev came across looking very sympathetic. You know, this is a guy

00:16:18.760 with 11 million average views on his podcast. It's nothing to sneeze at. For a core constituency of

00:16:25.820 the Conservative Party, young men who are mostly the listeners of Joe Rogan, this obviously speaks

00:16:30.620 to them. And today, you know, he had another speech to a foreign policy audience where he did

00:16:36.840 make that case about partnership and allyship with Canada and tariff-free trade. And so I don't know

00:16:44.080 if the political mission was accomplished with Joe Rogan, but I think his personal mission was

00:16:48.220 accomplished with Joe Rogan. And I don't know what Pierre Polyev plans to do if he doesn't win

00:16:53.520 the next election. And this certainly will help him in whatever endeavor he chooses to go in.

00:16:59.380 What a nasty thing to say on the way of basically being like, oh, well, I guess this Polyev is now 1.00

00:17:04.400 gonna become sort of podcast bro if he loses the next election again okay whatever but overall they

00:17:10.240 have to really dance around criticism of the interview itself because it was well done overall

00:17:15.900 here let's get to someone who cannot hold themselves back let's listen to and i have it a

00:17:21.180 little bit into the video because it's a 13 minute long video i just want a little sample

00:17:25.100 of the rachel gilmore take on it and just the whining naysaying against the interview nerve

00:17:32.440 damage that caused him to endure chronic pain. But I guess it's too much to ask that Joe Rogan

00:17:36.940 actually has an informed debate about an issue. Anyway, they then got on the topic of mental

00:17:41.720 health. And as you can imagine, it sent them down an extremely weird rabbit hole. And yeah,

00:17:47.460 after that initial pushback on the Fidel Castro thing, Polly didn't have a lot of fact check in

00:17:52.660 in the chamber. First, Rogan said in the most US centric way that the maid industry will obviously

00:17:59.360 want to grow and expand because they're going to want to profit the unfortunate thing is that any

00:18:04.560 organization that gets formed wants to grow and you get financial incentives and then you hire

00:18:14.160 more people and then it gets bigger and then what do you have to do well you have to keep doing what

00:18:18.400 you're doing exactly what are you doing you're killing people seemingly forgetting that uh we

00:18:22.800 actually have health care here in canada and rogan also laura doesn't know anything about anything

00:18:28.400 Even in a public health care system, there is a financial incentive to grow specific types of care because it benefits those people who are financially attached to that being a big part of the services of Canada's health care system.

00:18:46.420 if you are taking in patients and you are seeing more patients for made you as a doctor are making

00:18:52.760 more money or the health care system wanting to spend less on caring for people over time

00:18:58.080 would like to basically end people's lives early because it takes a big cost off of the docket for

00:19:03.660 them has she not thought this through at all she genuinely lives in a world where it's public

00:19:08.460 health care it's all free how how could there be a profit incentive when it's all free it's not

00:19:13.720 free governments have budgets if you have a department you want your department to be as big

00:19:18.680 as possible because that means your salary is going to be higher because you have more authority

00:19:23.000 over more people my goodness rachel suggested that fitness is better than antidepressants

00:19:29.400 the exercise thing it's not just give them you know control of their life it makes them happier

00:19:34.600 it's it's it showed there's been studies that show it's much more effective than antidepressants

00:19:39.480 Absolutely. Well, first of all, there's the physiological side, which affects the brain,

00:19:44.180 but it's also the sensation of discomfort that you push through.

00:19:48.400 It can be equally helpful in some instances.

00:19:52.180 Yeah, no, it is better. Do you think that it's healthy that we live in a society

00:19:56.600 where large portions of people are on antidepressants? What do you think people

00:20:00.860 need antidepressants a hundred years ago? They didn't. In fact, people got more exercise back

00:20:05.300 then and were probably happier their point is making is saying that you shouldn't stay cooped

00:20:09.720 up at home feeling depressed and medicating yourself because of it you should get out there

00:20:14.380 accomplish something have camaraderie with other people be able to get all that kind of stress and

00:20:18.800 anxiety out by like lifting weights and running and all that how is she disagreeing with this

00:20:23.520 which is awesome but according to dr michael craig miller assistant professor of psychiatry

00:20:28.540 at harvard medical school exercise alone isn't enough for someone with severe depression anyway

00:20:33.380 Why are we talking about severe depression? If you are chemically depressed, there's just some imbalance in your brain and you just cannot stop falling into depression. Is anyone slagging that person for not going on a jog and instead taking antidepressants? No. Although they should probably exercise too, as her own source effectively alluded to, that, you know, it's not the only thing you should be doing for some people with severe cases. Like, okay, so what's your point, Rachel?

00:20:58.300 As the conversation continues, we get a classic dangerous Polyev rant against experts. 0.95

00:21:04.380 I talk to farmers or factory workers, electricians.

00:21:10.040 I find they know just as much or more than the so-called experts I encounter on Parliament Hill.

00:21:15.980 It was the common people who don't study this stuff for a living, who don't read endless reports and studies, who could just figure out that if there's money pouring into the economy that's not matched by goods and services, it's going to bid up the cost of everything.

00:21:30.120 So that's my experience and my ideology is the common guy knows how to make his own decisions.

00:21:35.220 We need to empower him to do that.

00:21:37.280 Yeah, just stay out of people's lives.

00:21:38.940 Exactly.

00:21:39.340 Yes, because expertise and study doesn't matter.

00:21:42.240 So I take it Polyev will also have that dude from his street do his open heart surgery if he ever needs one.

00:21:48.800 She's so pedantic. We can probably end it there.

00:21:51.140 So you can understand the caliber of criticism from the hard left like Rachel Gilmore.

00:21:57.300 Oh, so you're going to let a guy who is like a welder do your heart surgery so you don't care about expertise?

00:22:05.100 Oh, my goodness.

00:22:05.760 No, the thing is that Kalev doesn't like the experts who have been provably wrong about the economy, about crime, about drugs, about foreign policy for decades now.

00:22:19.280 We should not listen to those people.

00:22:21.640 We have some great examples all over the province or all over the three, all over the provinces of industries that are crashing under the direction of experts.

00:22:32.280 Have you seen the logging industry in British Columbia?

00:22:35.760 experts are in charge of telling people how much the allowable cut is every year, how much you're

00:22:41.680 actually allowed to cut down, what you can cut down, what you can't cut down. And it has been

00:22:45.720 driving the industry into the floor because it turns out government experts and centralized

00:22:50.880 planners are not very good at this. That's his point. His point is not that you don't need a

00:22:57.180 heart surgeon to do heart surgery. His point is that you don't need a medical bureaucrat

00:23:01.820 interfering with you trying to be able to access medical services from that heart surgeon but

00:23:08.540 what do you expect somebody like like like uh rachel gilmore by the way i even checked laura 1.00

00:23:15.280 babcock has stayed away from this interview entirely she hasn't made a comment about it i

00:23:19.780 scrolled through her timeline she has not said a word because it's almost like she can't really

00:23:25.000 criticize it there's no angle here for her to criticize it and if she does come out she'll

00:23:29.700 probably just settle back on just screaming about how joe rogan is controversial and this is maple

00:23:35.040 mega fascism blah blah blah poly of his hitler or whatever and that's it they don't have an angle

00:23:40.780 of attack here which is good for poly of it's somewhat controversial that he went on the show

00:23:46.420 which gets a lot of attention on it but then he delivers a very you know straightforward and good

00:23:51.160 performance doesn't mean it's my favorite performance doesn't mean he didn't say things

00:23:54.760 or he should have said things I think he should have said. But overall, you can't really say that

00:24:00.680 there was any negatives attached to this. It was a big positive, pretty much no negatives. And so

00:24:05.320 he should probably continue with the strategy, appear on more podcasts, especially within Canada.

00:24:10.840 There's a lot of podcasts that he hasn't appeared on in Canada, I think would be a great idea,

00:24:15.160 like JJ McCullough's show. He has a million subscribers. He's based in Vancouver. And I

00:24:20.060 know the party actually skipped doing his podcast in the last federal election because they thought

00:24:24.660 that literally JJ's opinions on Quebec would be too controversial. It's like, come on, guys. You're

00:24:31.140 not winning the next federal election through Quebec. You're just going to win it by getting

00:24:35.620 people out in Ontario, British Columbia, and the Maritimes. Those are the three main provinces that

00:24:42.300 you need to be focusing on, or the three regions you need to be focusing on. Just do that. Anyways,

00:24:47.980 with that all being said, thank you guys for watching. Remember to like the video, subscribe,

00:24:51.880 consider hitting the join button and financially contributing, and I'll see you all next time.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - March 21, 2026

Poilievre WON massively with Rogan Appearance - Leftists whine anyways!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript