The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - March 25, 2025


Poll shows Liberals surge ended! CPC lead opening again (Analysis)


Episode Stats

Length

14 minutes

Words per Minute

182.3118

Word Count

2,563

Sentence Count

154

Misogynist Sentences

2


Summary

In this episode, I talk about how polls are not as accurate as they seem to suggest, and why we should be worried about them. I also talk about the results of recent polls, and how they don't necessarily match up with reality.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I am a big believer in polling when it comes to analyzing politics, but I'm at the same time somebody who does counsel caution when taking one pollster's numbers as being concretely accurate.
00:00:17.360 In this election cycle, I have had to discount a lot of pollsters that I just no longer trust, at least for this election. It doesn't mean that they're trying to make up numbers, but some of them might be. At the very least, it means that their samples aren't under control, which means that they're picking up a lot of overly excited activist liberals, and they're not picking up enough average Canadians when they're asking them who they're voting for.
00:00:41.440 Let's put it this way. When Pierre Polyev, at the opening of this federal election, could have a rally of 2,500 people, and then two days later, he has another 3,000 people in Hamilton as we speak, and he can basically recreate at least a rally of 1,500 people in any given riding in this country, I don't believe Angus Reid when he says that the liberals are currently at 45% in his sample, and the conservatives are at 37 or 38.
00:01:09.080 That's just not an election that's ever happened in Canada, where the conservatives used to be ahead by 25 points, and now they're behind by 8.
00:01:19.360 And in fact, I didn't believe Angus Reid when he said the liberals were only at 16% in December. At the time, I said, that looks really bad for the liberals.
00:01:28.180 At the same time, I don't actually think they're all the way down at 16%, five points behind the NDP, because I think it's just a bunch of people who are emotionally fed up with Trudeau, and they're no longer taking the polls, which means the liberal sample has slipped hard.
00:01:42.600 This is what Nick Nanos is showing right now in Nanos' poll. I think this is far more realistic, so I'm adding them to at least the category that we can tentatively trust to at least be attempting to get it accurate and is trying to do sampling well.
00:01:58.380 In his poll, he actually shows Trump and U.S. relations as the top issue for most Canadians at 31.2% of the population rating it as the top issue.
00:02:09.080 It is distantly followed by the economy and jobs at 17%.
00:02:13.660 And even in this poll, which is great news for the conservatives, the conservatives are ahead by three points and in fact are actually starting to widen their lead again.
00:02:22.640 This is exactly what I've been predicting is going to happen, and I think that we are going to see this reflected also in what innovative research finds, as well as abacus data.
00:02:33.000 But one point I want to talk about before I move on to some other stats I want to show you is that pollsters do get things wrong.
00:02:40.340 Whether it's because they are attempting to get it wrong, or it's just because their sampling sucks, it happens a lot.
00:02:47.520 It doesn't mean that we don't trust polls, it just means that we have to look at the poll and say, is this at all realistic to real life?
00:02:54.360 Don't just say, well, none of my friends are voting liberals, so why are they even above 25%?
00:02:58.740 Just look around on social media, look around in real life.
00:03:01.940 What are people talking about at the coffee shop?
00:03:03.760 The liberals are definitely increasing their vote share these days, but I don't think they're exactly leading the conservatives by five points.
00:03:11.820 I don't think they're in fact leading at all.
00:03:13.860 I think there's just a lot of artificial excitement.
00:03:16.400 And a little data point I want to use to back this up is the Saskatchewan provincial election.
00:03:22.660 I'm in fact borrowing a point that Frank Vaughn made on his YouTube channel, because it was a very good point, that look at these polls done by Insightrix, Mainstreet, Liaison, ResearchCo, Forum Research.
00:03:37.140 Look at this.
00:03:38.260 A 3% lead for the Saskatchewan NDP.
00:03:40.760 Oops, sorry, end up scrolling up there.
00:03:43.120 ResearchCo had them a 2 ahead.
00:03:44.980 Liaison had them 3 ahead.
00:03:46.560 Mainstreet had them 4 ahead.
00:03:48.220 Insightrix had them 5 ahead.
00:03:49.620 So how much did the Saskatchewan NDP beat the Saskatchewan party by?
00:03:55.300 Oh, well, in fact, they lost.
00:03:57.360 They lost by 11.9%.
00:04:01.420 The Saskatchewan party won the popular vote by 11.9% over the Saskatchewan NDP,
00:04:10.260 when a lot of the pollsters were showing the Saskatchewan NDP winning the popular vote by sometimes upwards of 3, 4, or 5 points.
00:04:20.560 That's nuts.
00:04:22.060 That is just negligence.
00:04:23.940 They may have been even attempting to be accurate.
00:04:26.140 And I think that Saskatchewan tends to actually have very, like, it's a harder population to poll.
00:04:32.900 I guarantee if they were postal code matching their polls, they would have found out that they were mostly polling people in Saskatoon and Regina.
00:04:40.840 And that's why it looked that close, in fact, with the NDP leading.
00:04:44.220 Because what farmer, and there's a lot of farmers in Saskatchewan, what farmer riding his combine is going to pick up a phone and take a 15-minute polling call with you if you're doing in-depth, or even pick it up for 30 seconds?
00:04:58.300 He doesn't care.
00:04:59.400 Your plumber does not care.
00:05:01.180 The electrician in the middle of a job is not going to step down his ladder in somebody's house and say,
00:05:06.460 Oh, of course I've got three minutes to take a call.
00:05:08.780 They are going to ghost you.
00:05:10.860 And that is what I think so many pollsters in Canada, in a certain sense, are willingly doing.
00:05:16.600 They know they're oversampling urban areas, and they don't really care.
00:05:21.200 ECOS and Frank Graves are the most obvious example.
00:05:23.780 I don't think Frank Graves is literally just typing in whatever numbers he wants.
00:05:27.720 He knows his sample looks like a downtown Starbucks lineup, and he doesn't give a crap.
00:05:34.140 And so that's why I like abacus data.
00:05:37.320 That's why I like innovative research.
00:05:39.660 That's why I like at least nanos for the time being.
00:05:44.000 I'd like to see them perform over the long run.
00:05:46.700 And again, if they show the conservatives ahead by 10 points tomorrow, I'm not going to believe that.
00:05:51.060 That's not realistic to this election.
00:05:53.280 It's a tight election that I believe the conservatives are leading by a bit.
00:05:57.720 Now, let's just jump over as well to some other numbers here that actually demonstrate the weakness of the liberals, even in these polls that are showing unrealistic numbers for the liberals.
00:06:10.080 I've just mentioned Angus Reid before.
00:06:11.980 They showed the liberals all the way at 16% in December, and now they're at 45% now.
00:06:17.420 In fact, somehow, like, greatly ahead of the conservatives.
00:06:20.740 This is from the Angus Reid poll.
00:06:24.240 It demonstrates that what we probably are just seeing is a lot of urban default liberals being polled that are pushing up the liberals' numbers.
00:06:31.100 But even when you ask those people, how firmly are you voting liberal, it's not actually that firm.
00:06:36.820 Look at this.
00:06:37.380 So dark blue is very committed voters.
00:06:40.040 Fairly committed voters are light blue.
00:06:42.240 Light red is not very committed.
00:06:43.360 And red, like dark red, is not committed at all.
00:06:46.540 So, like, not committed at all is, yeah, I would vote liberal or I would vote conservative.
00:06:50.000 I'm just not showing up this election.
00:06:51.380 I don't care that much.
00:06:52.920 And look, the CPC, 72% of CPC voters in the Angus Reid poll that shows the liberals way ahead are definitely voting conservative.
00:07:01.460 22% are fairly certain they're going to vote conservative.
00:07:03.800 6% not very certain they're going to vote.
00:07:05.960 And there's basically nobody saying they're not going to be voting.
00:07:09.140 With the liberals, 5% right off the top are not voting.
00:07:12.160 They don't care.
00:07:13.280 7% are fairly uncertain if they're voting.
00:07:16.000 36% are fairly certain they'll vote liberal.
00:07:18.900 And 51% are definitely certain to be voting liberal.
00:07:22.320 The conservatives have an extremely enthusiastic lead on the liberals of 21%, even in the Angus Reid poll.
00:07:32.120 And that Angus Reid poll is garbage.
00:07:34.200 When I say it's garbage, it's not because, again, it has a result I don't like.
00:07:38.100 It's because it shows them winning, like, seven seats in Alberta.
00:07:41.080 It shows them winning, like, three seats in Saskatchewan.
00:07:44.880 Do you know what the chances of that are?
00:07:46.740 Nothing.
00:07:47.940 Are there seats in Calgary and Edmonton that the liberals can win?
00:07:52.340 Sure.
00:07:53.100 If they absolutely overachieve, they can maybe win three or four.
00:07:57.940 That is if they overachieve.
00:07:59.680 I think the average outcome is that the liberals are either going to hold on to Skyview, McKnight, or Edmonton Centre.
00:08:07.280 It's going to be one of the three.
00:08:08.840 Maybe so he wins in Southeast, but the fact that the guy did not actually resign as the mayor of Edmonton proves he's only doing this as a, basically, a stunt to help the liberals.
00:08:18.680 He's running for them.
00:08:19.900 He's not going to try too hard, but he has the Edmonton mayor with them, and that might help hold on to Edmonton Centre.
00:08:25.500 But anyways, moving on to some other stuff, when you actually look at them, even in, like, Ontario, the Angus Reid poll shows the liberals punching above, like, 50% in Toronto.
00:08:37.360 I know that the NDP suck.
00:08:40.440 At the end of the day, though, the NDP are always, like, a 25% party in Edmonton, and the conservatives in that poll were at, like, 34%.
00:08:48.780 So the conservatives and NDP and Greens and even the PPC are all somehow underperforming in Toronto except the liberals.
00:08:56.840 What this looks like is that Angus Reid is just polling liberals on a sugar high, and everyone else is taking the polls at a more normal rate.
00:09:05.860 But because there are tons of liberals in these samples, that's what he assumes is going to happen.
00:09:10.680 Here's the thing with polling, too.
00:09:12.380 You need to make assumptions to do good polls.
00:09:14.940 It sounds wrong.
00:09:15.980 Well, why are you assuming?
00:09:17.180 Well, you've got to assume because people don't answer polls at the same rates that they actually vote in.
00:09:21.820 So if you have a sample where 59% of the people who vote in your poll are women, are you going to assume that 59% of people who are going to show up in election day are women?
00:09:31.620 No, you reasonably will weight the women down to where they usually are at when it comes to turnout.
00:09:38.100 And women actually do vote more than men, but just not, you know, a 59 to a 41 ratio.
00:09:42.960 It's more like 48 to 52 or 51 to 49, a little bit leaning more, elections tend to lean a little bit more female than male.
00:09:52.400 So you do have to make those assumptions.
00:09:53.940 But in all of these polls, when I look at their regionals, it's people like Angus Reid and others, assuming that the election is going to be like 34% or 40% people over the age of 60.
00:10:07.280 No, people over the age of 60 do disproportionately vote more than people under the age of 60, especially younger people under the age of maybe 28.
00:10:17.200 The problem is they're not going to.
00:10:19.780 That's an overperformance over every other election where they're assuming that it's tons and tons and tons of seniors showing up to vote liberal who are, in fact, a default liberal category.
00:10:29.680 So that's how you have Frank Grays and Abacus, not Abacus, Abacus has actually been very clear.
00:10:35.600 They also show the Conservatives currently with a plus three.
00:10:38.220 Innovative research even shows the liberals leading by one.
00:10:40.960 But I think innovative research does good work.
00:10:43.400 That last poll they put out, I think that their demographics were still a little bit too urban, but still, it was a good attempt to be accurate.
00:10:51.940 But when you see ECOS, when you see Leger, when you see even Main Street coming out and they are just assuming that the population that's voting this election is extremely college educated and much older, not really, not seeing it.
00:11:07.380 In fact, this is the last thing I want to bring up here, is that in this Nanos poll, the Conservatives are in fact winning every single age bracket except older voters.
00:11:16.620 And this is how other pollsters have been trying to show the liberals ahead.
00:11:21.960 Even this, it seems like a massive overpoll that people 60 years and older are going to vote 50% liberal, yet maybe in certain regions, I don't think overall.
00:11:32.060 But in the rest of the age categories, you have 40% people age and 29 voting conservative, 35% between 30 and 39, 38% between 40 and 49, and 43% between 50 and 59.
00:11:44.620 So this 60-plus poll seems a bit odd to me that suddenly, as soon as people go over the age of 59, everything starts changing.
00:11:53.720 And this is even in the Nanos poll that's accurate.
00:11:56.280 I think even in these more accurate polls, they have to fight back against what is a massive response bias and what is a massively default liberal, older voting demographic who tends to be answering a lot of these polls and skewing them.
00:12:10.640 But some pollsters, again, because they like the skewing, because maybe it gives the liberals artificial momentum, or maybe they're just genuinely bad at their jobs, are letting it seem like the liberal surge is never ending.
00:12:21.540 Every surge ends. Every surge ends. Every election. As soon as the election is called, things narrow.
00:12:28.000 So when pollsters are showing the elections start up, and it's even going, surging more, the news cycle doesn't back that up.
00:12:35.120 It exasperates me so much. When the news cycle is actually pretty pro-conservative at the moment, Carney's messed up on a lot of fronts, he's ducking debates, he's been exposed for a lot of corruption, and a lot of sort of like compromises that he has, or a lot of exposures he has with the CCP and whatnot.
00:12:51.920 This has not been an amazing news cycle for Carney, yet some of these pollsters, you'd think that he saved a small child from drowning and pure poly was seen kicking a puppy. Not happening.
00:13:03.520 But anyways, that's it for me talking about these polls today. I'm going to be coming back as we get more polling data, and again, I'm not just trying to ignore polls because they show the liberals ahead.
00:13:12.760 I'm ignoring polls that don't seem realistic. If I see a poll where the conservatives are at 48%, the NDP's at 21%, and the liberals are at 34%, you can guarantee I'm ignoring that one.
00:13:26.540 If I see a poll where the Blocs have acquired somehow only at 4%, I'm ignoring that one. Blocs are going to get 8%. At least, they could even get 9%, especially with Carney ducking French debates.
00:13:36.620 If I can see hallmarks of things that are off. ECOS shows sometimes, like the PPC at 10% in Saskatchewan.
00:13:45.020 I know Saskatchewan's very conservative. Not going PPC, especially in the year 2025 when that party has zero momentum.
00:13:52.820 Anyways, so that's it for me, guys. Make sure to like this video, subscribe to the channel, leave a comment, do all that great stuff if you've liked my election coverage so far, and I'll see you guys next time.