The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - August 31, 2023


Polling On Climate Change Is Nonsense: Canadians Care About The Economy


Episode Stats

Length

8 minutes

Words per Minute

205.58911

Word Count

1,849

Sentence Count

84


Summary

In this episode, I talk about the overinflowing nature of climate change in Canada, and why the Green Party is the worst party in the polls when it comes to climate change. I also talk about why I don't believe that climate change is actually the most important issue for most people.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 One of the most annoyingly overinflated issues in Canadian politics has to be environment and
00:00:05.680 climate change. It's one of those discussions where it seems like almost all of the discourse
00:00:10.800 around it is purely artificial. It's even true that a lot of the publications that do a lot of
00:00:16.040 focus on climate change and renewable energy reporting are effectively just funded by
00:00:21.320 renewable lobbying firms and different green energy companies. It's a very artificial part
00:00:26.200 of the Canadian political discourse. And one of the most annoying things, at least to me,
00:00:31.700 is just the way that polling has also inflated the issue. It makes it seem like it's the biggest
00:00:36.740 issue in Canada for a lot of people, when really what I think happens whenever we see polls that
00:00:41.740 come out supposedly demonstrating that climate change and environment are as the biggest issue
00:00:46.000 for people, it just demonstrates that there's an unseriousness that has been baked into a lot of
00:00:50.660 Canadian politics these days, that there's a sort of subsection of upper middle class people
00:00:55.800 who, when they're asked to name their top issue, they're more likely to not think about all the
00:01:01.420 actual concerns they have in life, but to think, what should I say that makes it sound like I
00:01:06.560 really, you know, I'm a deep thinker on Canadian politics. I really care about something like on a
00:01:12.380 moral level, like I have moral views on things, but not like those pro-life people, because, you know,
00:01:17.720 that's not the kind of moral stances I want to take. I want to take, you know, very, you know,
00:01:22.360 granola and earthy positions on issues. But so that's where I think that when you, whenever you
00:01:28.360 see climate change and environment being rated the top issue, it's not because there's actually a
00:01:33.600 large amount of people who care about climate change, it's because there's a lot of people
00:01:37.280 who think that it's, that they should be caring a lot about climate change, but, you know, they don't
00:01:42.080 live it day to day. So I just wanted to highlight this poll that came up from Nanos Research that
00:01:46.900 showed that supposedly 16.4% of Canadians as of August 18th, think that climate change and
00:01:53.660 environment is the top issue category in the country right now. And that's followed by inflation
00:01:59.000 at 13.8%, jobs and economy at 13.3, healthcare at 11, and, you know, housing and cost of housing at 5.9.
00:02:07.540 It's absurd. Considering how big the issue of housing is right now, I don't believe that the actual
00:02:13.740 top issue for people is environment and climate change. Yes, maybe it's the top issue for people
00:02:18.820 who make over $500,000 a year. But why is the Green Party always so far down in the polls
00:02:23.680 if supposedly everyone really cares about climate change? And you could say, well, well, the liberals
00:02:27.780 and NDP also take climate change seriously. Like, yeah, but if there's 50, if there's like 16.8% of
00:02:33.440 people who take the issue very seriously, you think that the Green Party wouldn't be struggling to
00:02:38.100 hold on to their two seats right now? Because like, I just want to go back to some of the polling,
00:02:41.460 like the polling right now, like this is the Main Street poll, like you go to the Nanos one has it
00:02:46.140 much closer to be fair. But like the Green Party wouldn't be pulling at 4% if climate change was a
00:02:50.860 real hot button issue in this country, especially because smaller parties actually usually have a
00:02:54.800 good time of getting an outsized rating in the polls, just simply because their members tend to
00:02:59.960 be much more politically active. Like you don't join a small party as a casual voter, you tend to join it
00:03:05.140 as someone who's very into politics. But the Green Party, everywhere you look, it's just, you know,
00:03:09.420 4%, 3%, sometimes they get 5%. But considering the party most closely associated with taking
00:03:16.040 climate change, like deathly seriously, they would probably be able to pull a lot more votes
00:03:21.580 if they actually, you know, they did genuinely, if they like the climate change issue was genuinely
00:03:27.920 one of the top issues in the country, but it's simply not. And really what I think when you look
00:03:32.860 at that 16.8% number, I think that the actual number of people who think it's their top issue
00:03:38.100 is probably around 5%, if not 3%. Most people who are struggling to like afford housing, who are,
00:03:45.620 you know, worried about losing their jobs, have lost their jobs, or are being really battered by
00:03:50.200 inflation, especially with their savings. Those are obviously the top issues. And of course,
00:03:54.740 in that Nanos poll, if you aggregated all the issues that are very much economic based,
00:03:59.620 it probably way outweighs the environment. But you know, the way that they sort of stagnate,
00:04:05.240 they sort of separate out all of the issues involving the economy and the way that they
00:04:11.180 concentrate everything to do with environment climate change into just the environment category
00:04:15.200 makes it seem more important. But even then, I think it's been overinflated. But yeah, it's like
00:04:20.580 even even the Nanos poll when I if I just quickly go back to it, like, there's not a social issue on
00:04:24.840 there. There's not, you know, abortion as an issue on there. There's no sort of like, you know,
00:04:30.400 opposition to wokeism, or, you know, support for the progressive agenda on there. It's just not
00:04:35.280 there. So I think that a lot of these polls have effectively been designed in order to sort of
00:04:40.000 remove some hot button issues. And then just put in a bunch of when I say boring, I don't mean not
00:04:44.520 important. But I mean, it's not like a hot blooded issue to talk about. But when you add economic issues,
00:04:49.140 and then you have environment there, you're going to have a lot of progressive people just saying
00:04:53.520 environment, because it's the most sort of high minded of the issues on that list. But in reality,
00:04:59.260 when they go out and vote, I guarantee that they're not voting based on the environment. Again,
00:05:04.420 even if I'm to move away from the Green Party example, why is the Green Party polling solo,
00:05:08.460 let's just pretend most of the people who vote for the environment option in these polls think,
00:05:12.440 well, the Green Party can't get elected, so I'll vote NDP or Liberal. But again, when I go through
00:05:16.420 all the recent polls, the Conservatives are up like 12 or 13%, some like anywhere from seven to 13.
00:05:22.520 That's a pretty decent lead. And if supposedly the biggest issue in the country is environment,
00:05:28.440 you think that the Liberal and NDP polling numbers would be a little bit more stable
00:05:32.320 if they're, you know, really taking the biggest issue in the country seriously. But it's just not
00:05:37.200 the biggest issue in the country. Again, like all the reporting on in renewable energy and green
00:05:42.240 energy, it tends to be very artificial part of Canadian politics. There's a lot of money behind
00:05:48.200 people pretending to take the climate change environment issue seriously. Not that people
00:05:52.460 online who say that they take it seriously are lying. But there's a lot of, you know, overheating
00:05:57.500 of that topic. Not like how many people are really reading article after article every day about
00:06:03.340 renewable energy and, you know, different sort of discourses on coal power and nuclear energy.
00:06:08.360 It's a very niche part of the, it's very niche part of Canadian politics. Yet somehow there's
00:06:14.120 millions of dollars to operate entire news publications just based off this topic. It's
00:06:18.660 not because people actually can't like go to another issue that wasn't even, didn't even make
00:06:22.960 that NATO's poll pro-life issues. There's like a dozen pro-life groups in Canada and they're all
00:06:27.920 fully funded through their donors. It's not that they're not getting artificially inflated budgets
00:06:33.260 from some sort of big corporation that is like invested in pro-life issues. That's something like that
00:06:37.920 doesn't really exist. It's that people genuinely care about it. So they give their money towards
00:06:42.100 it. But when you see, you know, people like David Musk up on, on Twitter, constantly championing the
00:06:48.040 climate change issue, it's not because people that really care that much, it's just because there's
00:06:51.040 a lot of money in championing the renewable side of the energy issue at the moment. But that's pretty
00:06:57.580 much it for me today. I just just got on my nerves because I always hate whenever like people,
00:07:01.420 whenever there's discourse about Canadian politics and the conservatives are ahead and then like
00:07:05.240 people fold their arms and they're like, well, I guess, well, they're going to fail in this next
00:07:08.880 election because they don't take climate change seriously. No one cares. No one cares. People
00:07:13.260 just want their lives to be better. I guess this is a quick aside. I'm not going to end the video
00:07:17.760 as fast as I thought, but I guarantee you, if you took the people who said that they think
00:07:23.620 environment is their top issue, and then you pulled them saying, if we reintroduce coal onto the power
00:07:29.520 grid in our province, we could reduce power bills by 40%. I, I guarantee three quarters of them would
00:07:35.700 probably maybe not admit it, but three quarters of them would say, yeah, it's reasonable to bring
00:07:40.480 back coal for that. You know, people are really struggling. They should, they should be able to
00:07:43.820 have some more money in their pockets to be able to pay for other things, but just their inflated
00:07:47.280 power bills. At the end of the day, people care about things that actually affect their lives.
00:07:51.060 And while climate change can affect your life in an abstract way, most people do not live in fear of
00:07:57.860 climate change day to day. They actually live in fear of the things that really are going to hurt
00:08:02.040 them, like inflation, like the ability to afford a house, like, you know, the inflation of food
00:08:07.120 prices and whatnot. Anyways, well, that's it for me today. You can donate to my GiveStandGo in the
00:08:12.060 description below. I'm being sued by a Chinese billionaire. I've already paid $15,000 into defending
00:08:16.680 myself. Annoying, I'm winning, but you know, any dollars that you can give me do help alleviate the
00:08:22.180 pressure of having to pay it all myself, which I've been basically doing for about a year and a half
00:08:27.360 now. And then also in the description below, there is the TNT email signup. Sign up for that,
00:08:32.900 especially if you are in the Calgary area, because Ben Shapiro is coming to Calgary in November and
00:08:38.520 then, and TNT will be releasing some early bird ticket codes so that people can go buy the tickets
00:08:44.780 for the event before the official opening of all the tickets for the general public. So make sure you
00:08:50.760 sign up for that if you want to see Ben Shapiro on November 16th in Calgary. And that's it for me today.
00:08:55.840 Okay.
00:08:57.000 That's it.