The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Rachel Gilmore embarrasses herself in Parliament and is mad people noticed Edited

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. A couple of days ago, I talked about Rachel Gilmore, the disgraced former global news journalist, making an absolute fool of herself in front of a parliamentary committee studying disinformation.

00:00:15.320 The story somehow has developed further since then, with Rachel Gilmore not being able to hold herself back from responding to her critics, and I think we need to talk about it a little bit more, because Gilmore, despite in a certain sense being a completely irrelevant figure, I think she is very relevant in that she represents the id of the left.

00:00:36.740 This is somebody who the legacy media and many left institutions consider a credible human being. An MP, either a liberal or an NDP MP, would have had to call this woman in front of the committee to talk about disinformation when she has no clue what she's talking about.

00:00:55.260 She's extremely arrogant and snarky. She's far left. In fact, she's actually okay with the murder of that healthcare CEO in the U.S. She's basically our discount version of Taylor Lorenz, that disgraced former Washington Post journalist who likes to smear people and dox people. 1.00

00:01:13.340 Rachel Gilmore similarly likes to smear people and dox people. They are one of a kind, and they almost look exactly the same. 0.99

00:01:20.300 But let's get into a little bit of this. I'm going to show you her testimony from the other day, if you didn't see it before. When I did talk about her, it was in a live stream many of you didn't see, or it was late into a video. It was like at the 20-minute mark I started talking about it.

00:01:34.880 So let's at least see how she presented herself and let you decide whether or not this is embarrassing or not.

00:01:42.580 Hey, everyone. Thanks for having me. This is obviously a very important topic, and I have some big feelings about it.

00:01:51.600 So to kick things off, I'm sure you all remember the Freedom Convoy. Yeah?

00:01:57.380 Well, as part of my coverage at the time, I joined several Telegram channels and groups where organizers and supporters gathered to exchange everything from planning details to fringe conspiracy theories.

00:02:09.520 And you might not have realized this, but it was actually just days after the convoy—actually, you guys probably do know this—just days after the convoy that Russia invaded Ukraine.

00:02:20.760 Yeah, so apparently in Rachel Gilmore's framing, the Russian government decided that it was at the right time to invade Ukraine because of the Freedom Convoy, or there's some connection there that she's trying to vaguely draw.

00:02:36.340 But Rachel Gilmore is somebody who doesn't understand the relationship between cause and effect.

00:02:42.540 So I think I've let that play enough. She just goes down a rabbit hole talking about how, you know, there's Russian disinformation out there.

00:02:49.780 And is there Russian disinformation out there? Sure there is.

00:02:52.840 But the liberals and Gilmore wanted to kind of be assumed that Russian disinformation is like really serious.

00:03:00.300 It's like hurting our institutions. And people don't like the liberal government because of Russian disinformation.

00:03:07.020 It has nothing to do with the fact their policies suck. There's just so much vague disinformation out there that that's the real reason why Canadians don't trust their government, because of the Russians, not because of the Canadian government's behavior.

00:03:19.780 But even just at the start of that, she's saying, I have some big feelings about this topic.

00:03:24.900 It's like, it was bad. And I'm not, like, grabbing the worst clip of this.

00:03:30.260 This is her opening statement that she uploaded herself. This was what she decided to post.

00:03:36.880 This was her own X account where she posted this opening statement.

00:03:41.280 I think she only got to speak for about, like, four and a half minutes.

00:03:43.860 There was some sort of emergency at Parliament or fake emergency, so everyone had to leave the room.

00:03:48.300 Maybe someone pulled the fire alarm because they had to listen to Rachel Gilmore. 0.96

00:03:51.500 But here is her response to the many, many, many people who have been mocking her performance because she does not just reserve the weird valley girl type behavior for the start of her testimony.

00:04:05.140 That was throughout the entire four and a half minute clip that I have seen, where she just talks as if she's sitting down for mimosas with her friends.

00:04:13.680 It's horrible. But here she is saying to her critics, a lot of very serious people are calling me unserious because I have a personality.

00:04:23.160 So allow me to share a few things. OK, apparently a personality means being insufferable.

00:04:28.320 If you guys are not insufferable, that apparently you do not have a real personality, according to Rachel Gilmore.

00:04:35.280 She says, I consulted a national security expert on my testimony before finalizing it.

00:04:40.340 How liberal was that national security expert?

00:04:44.500 A widely respected disinformation expert has praised this testimony.

00:04:48.840 Yeah, it's probably because they agree with your worldview. 1.00

00:04:53.220 There are a lot of people in academia who are class A morons. 1.00

00:04:57.700 I have a master's degree in public policy. 1.00

00:05:00.860 There are so many people who research public policy who just have no clue what they're talking about.

00:05:06.540 I had a professor who has seriously issued a study on whether or not tires and brake systems emit enough emissions that they require regulation or taxation.

00:05:18.340 Yes, that is something that somebody actually researched.

00:05:21.200 They never researched whether we should get rid of a tax or anything like that.

00:05:24.860 They only ever researched if we should tax people harder or regulate harder.

00:05:28.980 But Rachel Gilmore, we don't need to, it says continue at the bottom, but it really doesn't continue into anything.

00:05:34.820 She shows that she had sources for what the claims that she made.

00:05:38.100 I'm like, yeah, everyone knows that Russia invaded Ukraine.

00:05:42.200 You don't need a source for that.

00:05:43.580 It's the ridiculous leaps of logic you take from these fact patterns.

00:05:47.820 The fact that she then goes on to act as if, like, tons of problems in Canada are just because of Russian disinformation.

00:05:54.820 She connects dots that are just not there.

00:05:57.600 She also was, like, notoriously bad and, like, at getting things wrong when it came to the Freedom Convoy.

00:06:04.140 She pushed the arson conspiracy that a bunch of truckers who were wearing, like, had purple hair and whatnot and puffy, like, luxury brand jackets were trying to burn down apartment buildings, which was obviously untrue.

00:06:17.600 And it was a bunch of lefty people trying to plant some stuff.

00:06:20.940 But I want to just quickly jump over to the video that she ended up making on this whole issue.

00:06:26.720 That's part two.

00:06:27.440 Let's go through each of these parts because I think it's very telling about the behavior, again, of people that are valued by the media.

00:06:36.480 She likely right now works as a cutout for the Canada Anti-Hate Network. 0.99

00:06:41.240 And that, again, is an organization that the mainstream media takes seriously, despite being an obvious far-left smear machine.

00:06:48.420 Russia identifies the areas where we're most prone to polarization.

00:06:52.240 Yep, that's me testifying before a parliamentary committee on Russian interference and disinformation.

00:06:57.700 You might be wondering how I got here.

00:07:00.400 Nepotism.

00:07:01.260 So let me take you behind the scenes.

00:07:03.280 It all started with an email from the committee in mid-October asking me if I could appear.

00:07:07.580 But I was in Washington that week, so I couldn't make it then.

00:07:10.200 Luckily, this time, I could.

00:07:12.220 Now, when you speak at these things, you usually want to give an opening statement.

00:07:15.000 So you have to prepare that in advance so you can give it to them and they can give it to the translators who do live interpretation in people's ears.

00:07:21.800 So I spent my weekend drafting, researching, and fact-checking.

00:07:24.860 It was pretty easy to break.

00:07:25.800 You had to research the fact that the Russians invaded Ukraine, like, a few days after, and you somehow thought that was, like, a good thing to present.

00:07:33.140 I brainstormed what I wanted to say, but I also wanted to make sure I had receipts for everything that I ended up saying if I was asked for them.

00:07:40.400 You can see them all at the bottom of my Google Doc.

00:07:42.340 I also ended up on the phone with a national security expert who is also a friend, and I read her the broad strokes of what I planned to say.

00:07:49.100 When she confirmed that it was all accurate, I felt like...

00:07:51.520 What was accurate?

00:07:52.840 What?

00:07:53.440 The weird insinuations about Russia invading Ukraine because of the freedom convoy or the other, like, attacks that she ends up making on, like, the Canadians in general having basically turned on the liberals because they, I guess, believe Russian disinformation or something like that?

00:08:11.480 She talked in very vague terms that was basically just meant to sprinkle in the idea that there is a boogeyman out there that is causing bad things to happen and that we need to combat it.

00:08:24.020 She felt ready.

00:08:24.580 On the day of, I went through security, went up to the committee room, and waited outside.

00:08:29.100 They had a massive coat room that was perfect for fit checks, and this is the bag that I brought, which is from a local Palestinian bookstore.

00:08:36.300 The committee was...

00:08:36.840 Oh, yeah, by the way, she, like, really, really hates Israel in, like, a psychotic kind of a way, like her friend Erika Ifill, who I have dubbed in the past Black Hitler, if you want to look up Erika Ifill. 0.69

00:08:47.700 She has an extremely strange hatred for white people that's, like, overt, and at one point she attacked... 0.54

00:08:54.020 ...a brown lady as being fair-skinned, because if you dare or disagree with Erika Ifill, you become white in some way. It's insane. 1.00

00:09:00.960 I was running behind, dealing with something in camera, which means it's closed to the public, but I was cool lingering outside.

00:09:06.440 Because I had crashed at my mom's place, so I made her come with me, and she was calming me down because I was very nervous.

00:09:12.240 While waiting, I looked at social media, and I saw that one grifter-y dude was already planning to live-react on a stream to...

00:09:18.040 I don't even agree with Viva Fry all the time, but what does a grifter-y dude mean? 0.98

00:09:23.140 You're a grifter because you disagree with Rachel Gilmore, apparently.

00:09:30.080 Through my words. 0.98

00:09:31.080 That was a trip.

00:09:32.080 Then I got called in, took my seat, said hi to the MPs, and it was time to start.

00:09:36.080 You can head to my last video to see what I actually said.

00:09:38.580 It was interesting to watch the MPs and see who was, like, sitting, scrolling on their phone, and who was super engaged and listening to the opening statements, not just from me, but from everyone.

00:09:47.440 The third speaker was the guy behind the Vatnik Soup series, which exposes Russian disinfo actors.

00:09:52.200 But just a few minutes into his opening remarks, an alarm started going off.

00:09:56.140 We all just kind of waited for it to end, and people cracked some jokes that maybe it was Russia. 1.00

00:10:00.140 There was some probably brave hero who didn't want to listen to this stupid committee meeting. 0.99

00:10:05.140 Then we were told we actually had to evacuate. 0.99

00:10:07.140 And I overheard one staffer mention that a suspicious package may have been found.

00:10:11.140 So we all went outside, and one dude I asked said he heard the suspicious package thing had actually already been resolved.

00:10:17.080 So my mom and I went and got lunch.

00:10:19.080 So that was that.

00:10:20.080 Or at least I thought.

00:10:21.080 Because apparently seeing a young woman being unabashedly herself triggers a lot of the men on the internet.

00:10:26.080 Naturally paid.

00:10:27.080 Oh yes, it's men who hate her.

00:10:29.240 It's just men out there. 1.00

00:10:30.920 It's just all these disgusting, disgusting men who don't like Rachel Gilmore because she obviously doesn't know what she's talking about. 0.96

00:10:37.980 She, in fact, I don't know, maybe she has a problem with women, but she ended up doxing one of my friends on X, Bratney, 1.00

00:10:45.280 and basically helped amplify doxed information from Bratney in order to try and get her fired from her job. 0.99

00:10:53.420 A single Indigenous mother was doxed by Rachel Gilmore, and when she was called out for it by Bratney herself,

00:11:02.820 Rachel Gilmore then very snarkily re-shared the information and said,

00:11:07.100 Oh, you mean this?

00:11:08.620 Antifa people were actively calling her place of work, harassing them, trying to get this woman fired from her job, 1.00

00:11:15.520 and Rachel Gilmore could only giggle about it.

00:11:18.320 Oh, isn't that quite funny?

00:11:19.440 And this was for the crime of this woman in a private Facebook group, which was under a profile of her real name,

00:11:26.960 in a private group was just saying that people should go on X, where her profile is anonymous,

00:11:31.000 and just criticize the things that Rachel Gilmore was saying about James Topp,

00:11:36.640 the veteran who walked across Canada to oppose mandates and lockdowns on all that stuff.

00:11:41.480 So that was considered very, very bad by Rachel Gilmore and her allies,

00:11:46.560 so they then decided to target this woman for destruction. 1.00

00:11:50.220 I have an entire article I wrote about this, if you write, type down Rachel Gilmore, the National Telegraph, it's all there. 0.99

00:11:55.380 And Gilmore is so either gormlessly stupid or such a bad actor that she said, 0.96

00:12:02.540 Well, it's not doxing because some of the information is public. 0.99

00:12:05.980 Just because you can find information on the internet publicly does not mean that it isn't doxing to take that information

00:12:12.960 and shine a giant spotlight at it.

00:12:15.180 Technically, all information is somewhere in the public.

00:12:18.660 If you found somebody's information in the phone book back in the day,

00:12:22.600 and you just published it on the internet,

00:12:24.660 just happen to want to target this person for, you know, to get them to lose their job,

00:12:29.400 or for people to show up and egg their house or whatever.

00:12:31.740 But what's public, it's not like I'm doing anything wrong.

00:12:35.320 You can find that information online.

00:12:37.400 You can find anything online.

00:12:38.720 But if you take somebody who is acting in a private Facebook group,

00:12:42.400 talking about how people explicitly should respectfully disagree with you

00:12:46.720 and point out how you are smearing James Topp,

00:12:49.180 and this was shortly before Rachel Gilmore got fired after my article was released.

00:12:53.260 Hopefully, I had something to do with that because she was a bad actor. 1.00

00:12:56.880 But because she was going to respectfully disagree with her,

00:13:01.440 Rachel Gilmore says this is harassment and decided to help Antifa people counter-harass Bratney.

00:13:07.920 And this is obviously in retaliation.

00:13:10.760 This is something that Rachel Gilmore is personally interested in happening.

00:13:14.960 And these people are probably targeting her in some way because of the influence of Rachel Gilmore.

00:13:21.100 Or else, why would these accounts for some reason go out of their way

00:13:24.160 to target someone for criticism of Gilmore?

00:13:26.980 But let's go back to Gilmore talking about stuff.

00:13:29.980 I just wanted to give that story out to explain also why I have a personal animus

00:13:35.080 against people like Rachel Gilmore, especially when she pretends that it's men who dislike her.

00:13:40.300 Does Rachel Gilmore hate women? 1.00

00:13:41.540 Does she hate Indigenous single mothers? 1.00

00:13:43.840 What's wrong with her? 1.00

00:13:44.640 Pale male Toronto Sun and National Post columnist started having an absolute mentee bee that...

00:13:50.640 And then she goes to part two here.

00:13:54.080 Mentee bee that I know what I'm doing enough to speak at a committee.

00:13:58.060 Sorry.

00:13:58.300 Nobody...

00:14:00.300 Yeah, so everyone was having a mental breakdown because Rachel Gilmore was able to put one 1.00

00:14:05.120 foot in front of the other and actually string words together.

00:14:08.200 The words were embarrassing.

00:14:10.120 The whole, I got some big feelings about this.

00:14:13.260 You guys probably know about that already.

00:14:15.840 Gag me with a spoon. 0.95

00:14:17.360 Like, what is...

00:14:18.360 What was her performance?

00:14:19.360 It wasn't good.

00:14:20.440 I'm not sorry.

00:14:21.200 The haters actually got so out of control that one of them dressed up as me and filmed herself

00:14:26.040 going, um, like, totally, um...

00:14:28.700 For her sake, I really...

00:14:29.820 Yeah, it's a good impression.

00:14:31.100 And I guess, I guess Kat Canada herself is a misogynist. 1.00

00:14:34.840 She hates women. 1.00

00:14:35.740 Kat Canada famously hates women. 1.00

00:14:37.240 I really hope she got picked. 0.88

00:14:38.400 Anyways, all of that was pretty much limited to the app that shall not be named.

00:14:41.940 Because everywhere else, people were being super nice and supportive.

00:14:44.620 And the butt-nick soup guy even told me he loved my speech.

00:14:46.880 So that felt amazing.

00:14:48.020 Then I got home and saw that I hit 100k followers on TikTok.

00:14:51.960 Oh my goodness.

00:14:53.080 Validation, guys.

00:14:54.700 Validation.

00:14:55.340 She got 100,000 followers.

00:14:57.940 Also, TikTok followers are not worth that much.

00:15:00.680 Because there's such a great amount of view inflation on TikTok that having, like, 100,000

00:15:06.620 followers would be, like, the equivalent of having, like, 10,000 followers on X.

00:15:10.900 Because there's just so many people who click and scroll on TikTok all day long.

00:15:15.600 They'll watch, like, 100 videos a day.

00:15:17.720 That you having, like, a view count of, like, 10,000, 20,000, like Rachel Gilmore does, is

00:15:24.780 not much of anything.

00:15:26.500 For a video to be viral on TikTok, it has to have, like, half a million to a million actual

00:15:31.640 plays.

00:15:32.240 And Rachel Gilmore has never even approached that.

00:15:34.400 A lot of her videos have, like, 8,000 views.

00:15:36.620 So that was kind of the cherry on top of a very cool day.

00:15:40.000 Overall, it was a really neat experience, and I hope my testimony helped someone who heard

00:15:43.940 it.

00:15:44.320 And to anyone else...

00:15:45.080 Helped who?

00:15:46.640 How would any of that help anybody?

00:15:48.920 ...who has ever been told they need to dull their sparkle to be taken seriously?

00:15:52.680 Don't ever let boring, constipated dudes convince you that's the case.

00:15:56.820 I'm going to give you guys a piece of Wyatt advice.

00:16:01.320 Don't do anything that she did there.

00:16:03.380 If I go in front of a committee meeting, I will be, you know, myself, but I will be a

00:16:09.000 much more professional version of myself.

00:16:11.100 I'm not going to do, like, the Wyatt Claypool show in front of a committee if I am ever called

00:16:16.360 to testify for something.

00:16:18.160 Don't lose your sparkle, guys.

00:16:20.660 Lose your sparkle a little bit.

00:16:22.460 A little bit.

00:16:23.640 A little bit. 0.96

00:16:24.300 Because if you go in front of a committee meeting, this brain dead, talking to them

00:16:30.280 like they're 15-year-old friends and you guys are going to Starbucks between classes

00:16:34.700 in high school, you will be mocked.

00:16:37.320 There were so many people mocking her.

00:16:39.720 Yes, oh my goodness, the person on the panel with her was nice enough to say, I liked your

00:16:43.540 testimony.

00:16:43.940 What was he going to say?

00:16:44.620 I hate your testimony?

00:16:46.220 Nobody was going to say that.

00:16:47.540 Did he present like you?

00:16:48.680 Did he watch you present like that?

00:16:50.420 And he says, I'm going to throw my script out.

00:16:52.360 I got to go for it.

00:16:53.340 I got to start talking like that.

00:16:55.060 I got to talk in the words of the people.

00:16:58.780 Anyways, well, I want to move on to another thing.

00:17:02.680 We're going to move on.

00:17:04.040 This is where I'm going to be oddly appreciative of Mr. Frank Dominic here because we're going

00:17:09.080 to end off with a Frank Dominic video.

00:17:10.960 He is going to be the coffee beans for us today that allow us to get the smell of the

00:17:16.360 Rachel Gilmore videos out of our minds.

00:17:19.920 And so I just wanted to talk about this video because I think it, at least in my mind, proves

00:17:25.300 a lot of left wing TikTok people, they'll just say anything in the sense that his analysis

00:17:32.760 here is so bad.

00:17:35.100 I just need to talk about it because, again, it just demonstrates that I think there are

00:17:39.600 so many people online, especially on the left, who don't understand why the right is

00:17:45.060 growing in popularity while they have a complete misunderstanding of how people actually think.

00:17:51.240 And they'll just make stuff up in order to support their perspective.

00:17:54.900 But here we go.

00:17:55.660 Young Canadians aren't really concerned with Trump the way that many other Canadians are,

00:17:59.400 with only 11% of young Canadians being concerned about Trump and his administration,

00:18:02.580 with that being up to 26% with a 60 plus club.

00:18:05.300 And part of the reason for that is that young people have a lot of other things that they're

00:18:07.660 concerned about, like, you know, the economy, immigration, and being able to afford a house.

00:18:12.100 Okay, one thing, everyone cares about those issues.

00:18:15.060 Those are top issues for every single age bracket.

00:18:18.640 But he's very much cherry picking information as he goes here to suit this narrative he's

00:18:23.920 trying to develop.

00:18:24.680 Meanwhile, older people have a history with seeing what happens when we have a bad US

00:18:28.580 president and the impact that can have on the Canadian economy.

00:18:30.900 So this isn't an issue of, like, what is actually truly important to people on an internal

00:18:34.400 level, but more so young people thinking about what they need now and older people seeing

00:18:38.480 what has happened in the past and what can come from this.

00:18:41.600 Okay, so this is why I want to talk about there's this, he has this weird idea that, like,

00:18:47.420 old people have this in their inherent wisdom that they see a US administration, the damage 0.94

00:18:53.240 it could do to Canada.

00:18:54.260 No, there's a lot of you out there who are above the age of 65 watching this video right

00:19:00.120 now, who don't care that Donald Trump is the president, and only 26% of people who were

00:19:05.520 65 plus in this poll said they were concerned.

00:19:08.600 Yes, that is a big gap compared to younger people.

00:19:11.600 But do you know why that gap exists?

00:19:13.640 Because people who are above the age of 65, although conservatives are currently winning

00:19:17.920 every single age bracket with wide margins, but people above the age of 65, especially in

00:19:23.380 eastern Canada, are disproportionately liberal.

00:19:26.500 They also disproportionately watch the legacy media, who breathlessly covers Donald Trump

00:19:32.880 with massive negativity.

00:19:35.080 So why do you think that older people, who are probably pensioners at this point and not

00:19:40.400 working anymore, might have a stronger, you know, might care more about Donald Trump and

00:19:45.700 the US administration when they're polled?

00:19:48.180 It doesn't, why do you think young people are in, why do you think they are disproportionately

00:19:52.800 not caring about healthcare?

00:19:54.800 I think that healthcare only polled like 30% in terms of how much young people care about

00:20:01.000 it, but for people above the age of 65, and so young people's 18 to 29, and above the age

00:20:06.420 of 65, healthcare polls at like 65, 69% in terms of an important issue.

00:20:12.240 Obviously, that's how that works.

00:20:14.800 If you're young, you're young, and you don't use medical services a lot, and you're not

00:20:19.280 concerned about your health.

00:20:20.840 Older people are, obviously.

00:20:23.480 And so, but Frank, his analysis is like, young people don't care about the US administration

00:20:31.220 because they got bigger things on their mind.

00:20:33.160 They have the economy, they have immigration, which was also much higher for older people

00:20:37.000 as well, which doesn't make any sense.

00:20:38.680 And he says, and they only have time to care about these things.

00:20:41.780 Well, why are younger Canadians actually were disproportionately concerned about freedom issues?

00:20:46.720 Russia-China interference.

00:20:49.940 Actually, it was a different one, not that one.

00:20:51.500 I was like, that was actually older people that were more concerned about that.

00:20:54.500 But they were more concerned about indigenous reconciliation, and there was a couple other

00:20:58.380 niche issues.

00:20:59.780 Yes, older people are also more concerned about the climate, but that's because there are

00:21:04.120 rich, liberal pensioners who have the luxury of caring about abstract, vague issues 0.91

00:21:11.320 like climate change.

00:21:12.660 Which, that's why that happens.

00:21:14.660 And so, this isn't like, Frank's not a villain or anything here.

00:21:18.440 If anything, he's a hero because we don't have to think about Rachel Gilmore in the back

00:21:22.240 nine of this video.

00:21:23.720 But I find there are so many left-wing TikTokers who don't get any traction once they move to 1.00

00:21:29.820 YouTube because their analysis only passes the smell test if you're, frankly, a very liberal

00:21:36.100 young person on TikTok who's barely paying attention to these minute-long videos.

00:21:41.060 But why is immigration so important? 0.77

00:21:43.320 And it's 31% for people who are older and 36% for people who are younger.

00:21:47.500 But why is it such a hot-button issue for so many people?

00:21:50.500 First off, it's an easy scapegoat.

00:21:52.160 It's very easy to blame the lack of jobs and lack of housing on immigrants.

00:21:55.520 No one's blaming it on specific immigrants, but immigration is a problem. 1.00

00:22:00.280 And this is such a stupid left-wing talking point. 1.00

00:22:03.760 A problem exists. 1.00

00:22:05.960 Talking about that problem is scapegoating the problem.

00:22:08.720 On what?

00:22:10.000 Well, let's have either, or hopefully Frank actually addresses it.

00:22:13.260 Also seeing the government's abuse the LMIA system as well as international students in

00:22:16.640 the job market, which has especially for young people had a tangible impact on the availability

00:22:20.180 of jobs as well as the suppression of wages.

00:22:22.600 Wait, wait.

00:22:23.080 So, so is Frank blaming immigrants now?

00:22:26.160 Is he scapegoating immigrants?

00:22:27.540 I like how in one moment, because it's conservative to care about immigration, he has to say people

00:22:32.320 are scapegoating it.

00:22:33.260 And then in the next sentence, he then talks about how, you know, immigration is a problem.

00:22:37.260 Way too many temporary foreign workers, way too many foreign students taking up spaces 1.00

00:22:41.020 in colleges.

00:22:42.280 You know, there's the unemployment rates high, all that stuff.

00:22:45.440 Well, a lot of people are against immigration because they're racist.

00:22:47.560 I don't think this is mainly because of racism.

00:22:49.800 How many people are actually against immigration for racism?

00:22:53.820 How many?

00:22:54.320 I know genuine racists in Canada.

00:22:57.300 I call them out.

00:22:58.320 I don't like people associating with them because I don't like racism.

00:23:02.260 At the same time, is there a, how, what percentage would Frank Dominic blame racism on people

00:23:10.020 caring about immigration?

00:23:11.400 5%?

00:23:12.340 10%?

00:23:13.100 Because he seems to have it as a very forward focus in his mind when he talks about immigration,

00:23:18.060 that there's a bunch of racism out there.

00:23:20.140 It kind of just demonstrates, you can almost see his mind laid bare.

00:23:24.180 Immigration comes up. 0.98

00:23:25.100 We're talking about people from other countries who are not white.

00:23:27.940 Now he has to talk about racism.

00:23:30.000 Why?

00:23:30.540 It's an irrelevant factor.

00:23:32.260 What significant racist group of people is out there who are pushing against immigration

00:23:37.640 because they're racist?

00:23:39.140 No, people don't like the fact there's way too many people entering the country too fast.

00:23:43.200 We don't have the house.

00:23:43.860 We don't have the jobs.

00:23:44.980 And a lot of people are showing up here who don't care about Canada.

00:23:48.860 They don't care about the history.

00:23:49.940 They don't care about Western values or anything.

00:23:51.740 That's a problem.

00:23:52.620 Also has nothing to do with race.

00:23:54.320 You could have people move from countries that are very white and they will not have 1.00

00:23:58.140 Canadian values if they do not have Western values in that home country.

00:24:02.500 Syrians tend to be pretty white overall.

00:24:05.420 Syrians also like, look at Bashar al-Assad. 0.59

00:24:07.880 Is Bashar al-Assad a big pillar of Western virtue?

00:24:11.840 I don't think so.

00:24:13.360 But anyways, that's it for us today, guys.

00:24:16.440 Hopefully this video didn't go on too long.

00:24:18.400 But I always like to talk about left-wing content creators because I find them fascinating.

00:24:24.180 It gives you a good insight into who your opponents are in politics and honestly how

00:24:29.000 bad their arguments are, how warped their perspectives are, and how little they understand the average

00:24:35.100 Canadian.

00:24:35.880 Here's one person, Steve Boots, I'm just going to quickly mention.

00:24:39.900 I was looking at his YouTube channel.

00:24:41.500 I'm just fascinated by his new social media career because he stopped being a teacher in

00:24:46.700 Saskatchewan recently, and he's doing YouTube like he used to do TikTok because all these

00:24:51.780 guys used to be on TikTok, and TikTok, you can just spam out videos all day long because

00:24:55.920 I would just say TikTok's a spam site.

00:24:58.920 The amount, if 100,000 views on TikTok is nothing because everyone who uses TikTok will

00:25:04.640 watch 150 videos in a day, which means there is massive view subsidization of individual

00:25:09.720 videos.

00:25:10.660 Look at him now spamming out videos on YouTube.

00:25:13.780 It's a bit small on screen, but these videos have 149 views, 375, 65, 305, 144, 120.

00:25:23.380 I almost want to come beside Steven, so don't make videos this way. 0.99

00:25:27.600 It's stupid. 0.97

00:25:28.880 But the thing is that they don't know what the average Canadian wants, so I think he's 1.00

00:25:32.160 just throwing spaghetti at the wall at this point.

00:25:34.820 Anyways, so that's it for me today, guys.

00:25:37.580 Remember, subscribe to the channel, like this video, leave a comment, do all that great stuff,

00:25:41.440 and you can always support the channel financially if you want to support our legal fund.

00:25:46.060 My legal bills have gone up to $34,000 over the past few years, so anything you can donate

00:25:51.880 to that does take the burden of cost off me.

00:25:54.500 And so I guess that's it for me today, guys.

00:25:56.860 Have a good one.

00:25:57.420 Thank you.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - December 12, 2024

Rachel Gilmore embarrasses herself in Parliament and is mad people noticed Edited

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript