The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - August 06, 2025


Rustad BC Conservatives went WOKE and are now BROKE!


Episode Stats


Length

22 minutes

Words per minute

170.52345

Word count

3,881

Sentence count

237

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, we discuss BC Provincial Party Fundraising numbers for Q1 and Q2 of 2025 and discuss why the BC Greens are doing so well compared to the BC NDP and the BC Tories and why the Greens are not.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. Today on the show we're going to be talking about BC Provincial fundraising numbers, and if that seems oddly specific to you, hold up for just a second, it will tell a story about how BC Provincial politics are going in general.
00:00:16.260 So as you may know, in October of 2024, the BC NDP narrowly were re-elected to a majority government, just winning 47 seats. The Conservatives, who used to have zero seats in the last election, were able to get 44 seats, and the Greens just have two, which is pretty much all the Greens can really ever hope for, because it is just the more radical and more progressive version of the BC NDP.
00:00:43.300 It was already extremely radical, even compared to the federal NDP, but I digress. I'm going to break down for you guys what the parties were able to fundraise in quarter one and quarter two, and explain why we are seeing the shift happen.
00:00:59.780 Of course, I do work for the new party, 1BC, which is a break-off of the BC Conservatives after John Rustad kicked Dallas Brody out of the party, and Tara Armstrong and Jordan Keeley ended up also leaving, Tara Armstrong then joining with Dallas Brody to start 1BC, which we will get into in a bit.
00:01:18.440 But, of course, I would always recommend you go check out the 1BC website that I will have linked in the description below, as well as pinned at the top of the comments.
00:01:27.100 But, without further ado now, we will now get into the numbers of how the different parties are doing on fundraising.
00:01:34.200 We will start off with quarter one for each of the parties. I will write it in blue.
00:01:39.840 I did not put the BC Conservative Party's name in blue for a reason, which we will be getting into.
00:01:46.820 And so, in quarter one, we had the BC NDP raise $802,000.
00:01:54.940 This is the first full quarter after they had won re-election.
00:02:00.520 Of course, the fourth quarter of 2024 is when the election had taken place in BC.
00:02:06.400 And, of course, a lot of the parties tend to do a lot of their fundraising earlier in the year, trying to build up a war chest.
00:02:11.380 But that's not too bad. Of course, they're back in the government, and usually that means that your fundraising is going to look pretty good.
00:02:17.500 Like, let me move my microphone over just so that I'm not turning away from it constantly.
00:02:22.940 But that was their first quarter numbers.
00:02:25.940 And the BC Conservatives actually had some pretty good fundraising in the first quarter of 2025.
00:02:31.840 They had $723,000 that they brought in.
00:02:38.060 And then we had the BC Greens bring in $210,000.
00:02:43.760 Right now, they are in the middle of a leadership race in order to replace Sonia first to know.
00:02:49.760 They have an interim leader right now who isn't running for the leadership, and not even their other MLA isn't even running for the leadership.
00:02:56.220 It's very strange.
00:02:57.600 But that is quarter one fundraising.
00:03:00.560 Not bad for the Conservatives, considering that they did lose the election, but their fundraising is keeping pace with the NDP.
00:03:08.320 Now, let's move on to Q2.
00:03:11.300 Now, let's start from the BC Greens.
00:03:15.220 The BC Greens were actually able to keep pretty consistent fundraising, getting $200,000 in money in the second quarter of 2025.
00:03:26.800 Then, we have the BC NDP dropping a bit down to $700,000 in quarter two.
00:03:33.640 And now, this is where it gets not great.
00:03:39.800 The BC Conservatives, after raising $723,000 in the first quarter of 2025 fundraising, were able to only bring in $350,000.
00:03:54.380 In fact, when you actually run the numbers past the hundreds of thousands of dollars, and you go down to the hundreds,
00:04:02.640 the BC Conservatives, in fact, brought in less than half of what the BC NDP brought in.
00:04:08.700 And you will notice that they are now much closer to the BC Greens,
00:04:12.860 the BC Greens having raised more than half of what the BC Conservatives ended up bringing in.
00:04:17.720 Now, why is this?
00:04:20.700 Why is this?
00:04:21.700 If you're opposing the BC NDP, you think it would be very easy to raise money.
00:04:27.500 The BC NDP are terrible.
00:04:29.260 The condition of British Columbia right now is awful.
00:04:31.800 It should be easy to bring in money, you know, correcting for the fact that some people may be so broke at this point that they can't afford to do so.
00:04:40.500 But this is pathetic numbers.
00:04:43.120 I need to just quickly calculate how much of a drop is this.
00:04:47.880 They ended up, and by the way, in the second quarter of 2024, leading up to the election, and I know it was an election year,
00:04:53.800 but they brought in like $1.1 million in that quarter.
00:04:57.900 And now this year, they're bringing in $350,000 with 41 MLAs who can presumably travel around and fundraise for the party.
00:05:06.140 So they ended up bringing in 48%.
00:05:12.800 This is 48% of what they brought in in the first quarter.
00:05:20.600 They had a massive, massive drop.
00:05:24.180 This is pathetic.
00:05:25.480 The Greens barely had a drop, and yes, the BC NDP had a drop of $100,000,
00:05:30.560 but they also still brought in $700,000.
00:05:34.320 And now I want to show you something that kind of highlights why a lot of people don't really want to donate anymore to the BC Conservatives.
00:05:42.960 I'll just quickly bring this up on screen.
00:05:44.860 It has to do with things that people like the executive director of the party have been saying,
00:05:49.960 effectively indicating the party no longer really cares about opposing things like SOGI and DRIPA.
00:05:56.820 This first clip is going to be about DRIPA, and then I want to move over to SOGI.
00:06:00.520 If you don't know it, SOGI is, or DRIPA is, the Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act,
00:06:07.220 which is the BC legislature's imposed version of UNDRIP, the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
00:06:16.320 And on this podcast, Mo Amir's podcast, Van Colors, on Czech News,
00:06:22.440 the executive director of the BC Conservative Party, Angelo Isidoro, went on to talk about what people like Dallas Brody,
00:06:31.800 Jordan Keighley, and Tara Armstrong are getting wrong about how politics is supposed to go.
00:06:36.400 This is a clip I made myself.
00:06:38.100 It's two minutes, but sit through it, and you will be enlightened by why people are not really confident anymore with the BC Conservatives.
00:06:44.460 Part of what I didn't like about the BC Liberals and sort of the modern left is this notion of,
00:06:50.800 I like something or I don't like something, therefore you should not be allowed to like that thing.
00:06:58.000 Right?
00:06:58.180 Right, okay.
00:06:59.240 The purity culture.
00:07:00.500 The purity culture.
00:07:01.480 And I think what we're witnessing is some of that purity culture also emanating from the right,
00:07:07.080 which it's done before, right?
00:07:08.760 And I go back to like Harry Potter books being burned in the early 2000s.
00:07:13.020 And I think that, you know, there are folks who didn't understand that the excitement of I get to vote for whatever I want
00:07:20.140 also means that your colleague gets to vote for whatever they want.
00:07:23.920 And you might not agree with that.
00:07:26.300 And how do you handle yourself at that reality?
00:07:29.580 Right?
00:07:29.840 How do you handle the reality that, you know, you don't like DRIPA, but there's, you know, there's another colleague in your caucus who does.
00:07:38.920 And part of the beauty of what's been built is you can have your opinion, you can vote however you want,
00:07:44.100 and they can vote however they want, as long as you agree on like the sacred cows.
00:07:48.600 Right.
00:07:49.060 And I think what we've seen is this...
00:07:51.440 Repealing DRIPA is not a sacred cow for the Conservatives.
00:07:53.680 Well, I think that, no, it's in our platform.
00:07:56.240 Like, that's what I mean. That's what I'm asking.
00:07:58.660 So is it a sacred cow or it's not?
00:08:02.120 I think it's for the leader to say.
00:08:03.920 Like, it's in the...
00:08:05.640 I love this clip.
00:08:07.400 Now, I don't agree with much of what Mo Amir says on politics.
00:08:11.400 He's openly very socialistic, very progressive.
00:08:14.360 He openly calls himself woke.
00:08:15.920 But me and Mo Amir can at least get along in the fact that neither of us like to beat around the bush and just talk in corporate political speak.
00:08:26.760 Angelo Isidoro here really needs some PR training.
00:08:30.480 Do you know what that man just did?
00:08:31.800 He just admitted that the party doesn't actually believe in repealing DRIPA.
00:08:35.900 Because he just referenced it as something that people like Dallas, Jordan, and Tara need to get over if their colleagues don't want to vote to repeal it.
00:08:44.100 And then he admits it's part of the platform.
00:08:46.540 And then when Mo, like, I love this clip.
00:08:49.300 Because, like, Mo is laughing because you can tell he's like, isn't that part of your platform?
00:08:53.300 Why is this, like, being referenced as something that a free vote would happen on?
00:08:57.380 And then when he says, is that a part of the platform or do you have to vote for it?
00:09:00.940 Is this a sacred cow?
00:09:02.360 Angelo can't even say yes.
00:09:04.440 He can't even say yes.
00:09:05.760 And I've seen so many BC conservative people, people who know better, coming out and saying, well, you know, of course we oppose DRIPA, but we also need to pursue real economic reconciliation and we can't be opposing that.
00:09:19.880 And the thing is that, yes, they oppose DRIPA.
00:09:22.900 Some of them will say they oppose DRIPA.
00:09:24.300 But others like Alia Warbus and Eleanor Sterko and Scott McInnes and Peter Milibar and people like that, they won't say they're against it because they're in favor of it.
00:09:32.580 But even the ones who are against it will say, but, you know, of course we still want to follow the guidelines laid out in UNDRIP.
00:09:38.700 It's like UNDRIP is worse.
00:09:40.500 DRIPA is like 80% strength version of UNDRIP.
00:09:43.660 And now you're like, okay, we'll repeal it, which I don't believe you will.
00:09:47.400 If you put it up for a free vote, let's put it this way, guys.
00:09:50.900 If 10%, or let's say one-fifth, one-fifth of people in caucus or even 10% of caucus does not like, you need 47 seats for a majority in British Columbia politics.
00:10:05.900 If you lose any people trying to repeal DRIPA and you only have 47 seats, you cannot repeal it.
00:10:12.760 And now let's think if you had how many people, if you had a fifth of your MLAs who are in favor of DRIPA, that would mean if you got even 50 seats, you couldn't do it because you would only have 40 voting to get rid of it.
00:10:29.660 You would need like how many, you would need like 59 or 60 MLAs before you could actually reliably get rid of DRIPA if you allowed that to be a free vote.
00:10:42.460 And Angelo said, well, John apparently is going to tell us whether or not it's up for a free vote or not.
00:10:47.660 How don't you know, as the executive director of the party, how is the fat salary doing for you, Angelo, by the way?
00:10:54.380 How do you not know, as the executive director of the party, what the flipping leader thinks about DRIPA if he's going to make it a free vote or not?
00:11:01.720 You don't know that?
00:11:02.660 Now let's get to another issue.
00:11:06.120 And that is SOGI.
00:11:10.420 One of the two MLAs I work with at 1BC, I work the legislature with 1BC.
00:11:16.100 Full disclosure, my salary is a massive $25,000 a year.
00:11:20.200 I get paid like sub, sub, like a minimum wage part-time because the point is not for me to make money.
00:11:27.840 I, in fact, make only $25,000 a year as a personal choice because I don't like people working at the legislature who I know are making over $150,000, who are making over $200,000 a year.
00:11:38.920 And I know they don't do a thing.
00:11:40.760 They're utterly worthless.
00:11:42.180 And, in fact, they advocate for policies, they advocate for weakness, where B.C. Conservative members demanded that they be strong.
00:11:49.900 But here is something that Tara Armstrong pointed out about the current B.C. Conservatives' policy on SOGI.
00:11:57.180 So Manteep Dhaliwal, who is a B.C. Conservative MLA in Surrey, says,
00:12:02.380 Introducing the Parental Transparency and Age-Appropriate Education Act.
00:12:05.880 As a critic for parental rights, I am proud to announce the introduction of a new bill titled the Parental Transparency and Age...
00:12:12.180 ...Age-Appropriate Education Act.
00:12:14.240 And it goes on to explain what it's all about.
00:12:16.340 But Tara Armstrong read the bill. 0.99
00:12:18.540 And, by the way, guys, this supposedly anti-SOGI bill does not actually oppose SOGI.
00:12:25.060 As Tara said back during the last session, she said,
00:12:28.180 During the campaign, John Rustad promised to get rid of SOGI.
00:12:33.260 What does his parental bill actually offer?
00:12:35.700 Another mushy letdown?
00:12:37.540 All the bill would do is set up committees to discuss whether school materials are...
00:12:42.180 ...Age-Appropriate.
00:12:43.060 It doesn't even mention gender ideology.
00:12:45.900 It does nothing to address schools concealing gender transitions from parents,
00:12:50.640 schools allowing boys into girls' bathrooms,
00:12:52.720 schools indoctrinating kids with trans ideology in GSAs and pride clubs,
00:12:57.460 school counselors encouraging kids to socially transition with new pronouns
00:13:01.720 or to chemically transition with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.
00:13:05.920 Parents want the starvation to stop.
00:13:07.280 Why does John Rustad...
00:13:08.860 Why doesn't John Rustad?
00:13:10.860 Maybe he does, but there are consequences to making trans rights activists like Eleanor Sturko 0.89
00:13:16.020 and Alia Warbus, who are two BC conservative MLAs, by the way.
00:13:20.260 Warbus actually made a documentary on someone having a gender transition as a very big positive.
00:13:26.160 But she says,
00:13:27.180 But there are consequences to making trans rights activists like Eleanor Sturko and Alia Warbus
00:13:33.060 your de facto leaders in caucus.
00:13:35.300 It means it's a private member's bill that is never going to get passed,
00:13:38.420 and they still couldn't even pretend to fight back against gender madness. 0.83
00:13:43.220 How tragic that the largest opposition caucus in BC history found itself with such a weak, woke leadership.
00:13:49.300 So yeah, this is why, guys, this is why we are seeing a drop-off like that.
00:13:57.280 They only raised 48% of what they raised in quarter one and quarter two.
00:14:01.440 At the same time, let's run the numbers for the NDP.
00:14:04.900 The NDP, a party that is awful, by the way, I hate the NDP,
00:14:09.320 the NDP was able to bring in 87%.
00:14:14.300 This is 87% of what they raised in the first quarter.
00:14:20.000 They're getting in the second quarter, which is usually a more sluggish quarter.
00:14:22.700 They only had a 13% drop-off.
00:14:25.900 The BC Greens, what was their drop-off?
00:14:28.300 I don't even think that's like 5% drop-off.
00:14:30.560 Yeah, they only had, this is 95% of their quarter one fundraising that they got.
00:14:40.580 And the BC Conservatives, by the way, I'm actually going to have to pause this
00:14:44.080 so I can erase all this stuff to talk a little bit more about some other fundraising things.
00:14:48.020 I'm going to get to the current finances of the BC Conservative Party,
00:14:51.360 and this is all public.
00:14:54.100 So right now, the BC Conservatives do not have any money in the bank.
00:14:59.900 In fact, they have negative amounts of money in the bank.
00:15:03.120 So the CPBC...
00:15:09.720 How much do they currently have in the bank?
00:15:14.360 Well, technically, they have a little bit more than $500,000 cash on hand.
00:15:21.560 But that is counterbalanced by the fact that they have over $5 million in debt.
00:15:35.780 Current liabilities and long-term liabilities.
00:15:38.560 And if you actually take off the cash in hand off of the current debt,
00:15:42.900 you still end up with, you get $4.5 million in debt.
00:15:50.160 These are negative numbers.
00:15:52.160 They do not have this money.
00:15:53.960 So when they only raised $350,000 in the second quarter of 2025,
00:16:01.700 only raising $700,000 in the first quarter, which was pretty good fundraising,
00:16:05.500 they are quite literally not even putting a dent in the debt.
00:16:08.980 They do get a per-vote subsidy, which is, I believe, like around $1.80 per vote.
00:16:13.500 And they got like 991,000 votes or something like that.
00:16:16.680 So per year, they get $1.6 million from taxpayers.
00:16:20.840 By the way, 1BC would love to get rid of per-vote subsidies
00:16:24.220 because it's a stupid policy that makes taxpayers fundraise for parties
00:16:28.360 that are oftentimes unpopular.
00:16:30.320 But the taxpayer doesn't get to say,
00:16:31.740 hey, you guys are not meeting the commitments you guys promised us.
00:16:35.680 So why should we have to keep transferring you $1.6 million a year?
00:16:39.260 We'd love to get rid of stuff like that.
00:16:40.960 But right now, we have with the BC Conservatives,
00:16:44.480 they're getting $1.6 million a year.
00:16:46.680 But if they are currently $4.5 million in debt,
00:16:51.500 even if you applied $1.6 million to it per year,
00:16:56.160 it would still take, I'm still bad at math, so I'm going to calculate this,
00:17:00.100 it will still take them 2.8 years to pay it off.
00:17:03.820 And if you think these guys don't still have fat salaries
00:17:07.500 and have a lot of fundraising or advertising commitments
00:17:11.020 and other sorts of things, email servers,
00:17:13.900 data sites that they have to pay money to
00:17:16.120 in order to keep all their data there,
00:17:17.840 these guys are not even denting the debt in the year 2025.
00:17:22.120 And now they're running this leadership review
00:17:23.760 where like 50 people in all of Surrey will show up to vote
00:17:27.520 on whether they not want John Rustad to stay.
00:17:30.400 Oddly enough, now John Rustad, during his own leadership review,
00:17:33.320 really cares about election integrity,
00:17:35.520 during the BC Conservative AGM,
00:17:37.700 he and his allies literally rigged the AGM
00:17:40.520 in order to make sure that the people
00:17:42.760 who actually wanted transparency, accountability,
00:17:45.040 and real conservatism wouldn't win.
00:17:46.700 They literally bust in 100 guys
00:17:48.620 just to vote down ballot on anything that John Rustad wanted.
00:17:52.060 Not really pathetic.
00:17:52.960 But now he has tight security
00:17:54.440 so that the same idiots that he employed
00:17:56.360 in order to rig the AGM
00:17:57.780 don't come and rig his own leadership review against him.
00:18:00.600 Because, guys, by the way,
00:18:02.800 there are like five or six MLA candidates
00:18:05.100 or MLAs who currently want to replace Rustad
00:18:07.880 because although they say they like Rustad,
00:18:10.180 they think he's an idiot.
00:18:11.700 I've talked to these people.
00:18:13.240 They all know who's running.
00:18:14.800 They all think John's weak.
00:18:16.100 You have people like Eleanor Sterko who wants to be leader. 0.85
00:18:19.440 Gavin Dew wants to be leader.
00:18:21.200 He just put out this weird op-ed
00:18:23.240 where he was talking about
00:18:24.800 like how the Conservatives need to not be so Conservative
00:18:27.480 because, you know, real conservatism is not doing anything
00:18:30.860 whenever, like, you know,
00:18:32.900 real conservatism is apparently maintaining institutions
00:18:36.020 that the NDP creates
00:18:37.400 because, you know, maybe voters won't like us so much
00:18:40.000 if we don't, you know, do exactly what the NDP wanted.
00:18:43.560 You know, we might freak out voters
00:18:44.760 if we actually say what we don't want to do.
00:18:47.000 I'm trying to find this.
00:18:49.040 I don't have it for you guys today,
00:18:51.020 but Gavin Dew posted some endorsement of Kamala Harris
00:18:54.940 during the 2024 election
00:18:56.460 because he's a big Kamala Harris fan.
00:18:58.660 Actually, no, it wasn't even during the 2024 election.
00:19:02.120 He was actually, this is, oh my goodness,
00:19:05.000 this is blowing my mind.
00:19:06.140 Gavin Dew was actually a 2020 Democratic primary
00:19:09.700 Kamala Harris fan.
00:19:12.000 That's embarrassing.
00:19:13.480 But the people who want to take over for John
00:19:15.140 are Eleanor Sterko, Gavin Dew,
00:19:17.480 Carmen Bangu, who can't even survive a friendly interview 0.99
00:19:19.860 without falling all over himself.
00:19:21.820 Bruce Bandman wants to take over.
00:19:23.660 And then we also know that a Dark Horse candidate 0.88
00:19:25.860 might also be Peter Millibar
00:19:27.760 and then some other people.
00:19:30.000 I think this might be someone I'm also missing in there,
00:19:31.940 but it doesn't really matter.
00:19:32.960 A lot of these individuals are just not very good.
00:19:35.880 But that should be it for this video, guys.
00:19:39.220 Hopefully you don't mind this being shown to you.
00:19:42.480 This is very nitty gritty,
00:19:43.760 but I think it is also very,
00:19:45.980 it's something that people need to understand.
00:19:48.140 The numbers, the fundraising numbers,
00:19:49.860 do affect the parties.
00:19:52.060 It does affect the electoral viability.
00:19:54.840 This is why I'm helping out 1BC now.
00:19:56.900 One, I don't like screwing over the members of a party
00:19:59.160 and pretending that rigging an AGM is okay.
00:20:01.620 I don't like executives in the party
00:20:03.820 getting a $177,000 bonus after losing the election.
00:20:08.420 Two people, to my knowledge,
00:20:09.600 got a $177,000 bonus post-election.
00:20:12.380 I don't like wasting money on bad consultants,
00:20:17.840 on bad advertising firms,
00:20:19.700 on bad vendors during an election
00:20:22.140 that we easily could have won.
00:20:23.960 And that's why I'm helping out 1BC.
00:20:26.580 So check out 1BC.ca in the description
00:20:29.460 at the top of the links.
00:20:31.400 Again, we actually have money, cash on hand,
00:20:35.660 and we actually don't have a massive debt.
00:20:37.720 So if you stick around with these guys,
00:20:39.660 you are going to have to pay off $4.5 million.
00:20:44.080 By the way, do you know how much money the BC NDP has?
00:20:46.800 They have $4 million without any debt.
00:20:49.360 They have this much money
00:20:51.380 without having to pay off anything to get it first.
00:20:55.180 The conservatives have $500,000 on hand,
00:20:57.660 but even if I take it out of the debt,
00:20:59.180 they still have the $4.5 million in debt.
00:21:02.060 So I would say if you're a British Columbian,
00:21:04.500 encourage your MLA,
00:21:06.160 if you have a BC conservative,
00:21:07.860 to join 1BC,
00:21:09.320 because then they actually may have a hope in heck
00:21:11.400 to actually get re-elected
00:21:12.880 because they'll have more than $5 in the bank
00:21:16.880 and they'll actually be able to talk about policies that matter.
00:21:19.720 They won't be talking about slight reforms to SOGI.
00:21:23.460 They won't be too cowardly to talk about DRIPA.
00:21:25.620 They will actually want to reform the healthcare system
00:21:28.300 rather than just pointing at,
00:21:29.720 oh my goodness, look, it's a 14-hour wait
00:21:31.560 at the Mission Hospital.
00:21:34.480 That's bad.
00:21:35.300 What are you guys going to do about it?
00:21:36.680 And every time I see a BC conservative MLA,
00:21:39.260 and it's not their fault,
00:21:40.100 a lot of these people are great,
00:21:41.640 but a lot of BC conservative MLAs
00:21:43.240 will just look at how many hours of wait time it is,
00:21:45.700 but they won't actually say
00:21:47.300 we need to slash bureaucratic spending
00:21:49.280 and shift it to the front lines
00:21:50.840 because, you know, that might be controversial,
00:21:53.040 so let's just keep pointing out the problem
00:21:54.660 without actually pitching a solution.
00:21:56.780 1BC has solutions.
00:21:58.920 My goodness, it's not that hard to do politics,
00:22:02.100 but I guess it's hard if you're John or Angelo
00:22:04.420 or Azeem Jowani, you know,
00:22:05.840 then you actually have to put some thought into it.
00:22:08.220 Angelo Isidoro, by the way, you know,
00:22:10.000 a guy who's now criticizing things
00:22:12.420 that Dallas and Tara are saying,
00:22:14.140 that they're being too pushy
00:22:15.640 about their views on policy.
00:22:17.640 You know, Dallas Brody is somehow racist
00:22:19.640 for having criticisms of the reconciliation industry.
00:22:23.460 Didn't Angelo used to run the UBC Free Speech Club?
00:22:26.900 What a way to fall down in your career.
00:22:29.000 My goodness.
00:22:29.700 But I guess he has the money
00:22:30.860 that it makes it all worth it.
00:22:32.440 But whatever.
00:22:34.380 That's it for this video, guys.
00:22:36.520 Probably more BC political rants in the future.
00:22:39.260 Hopefully you liked this.
00:22:40.880 And I will see you guys in my next video.
00:22:43.140 Check out the 1BC website.
00:22:44.940 See you guys later.