The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Sore Loser Bonnie Critchley implies Poilievre Cheated!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here.

00:00:02.740 It should have been obvious that Conservative Party leader Pierre Polyev was going to win the Battle River Crowfoot by-election by a wide margin.

00:00:11.160 But for some reason, today, we have liberals online as well as the legacy media coping really hard and implying that Pierre Polyev may have cheated and he wouldn't have won by as wide of a margin if he hadn't done these supposedly unlawful things.

00:00:30.000 I'm going to get into it in just a second with you guys.

00:00:32.380 I just want to remind you first, though, that if you like the channel, make sure to leave a like on the video, subscribe if you are not yet a subscriber.

00:00:39.460 I am trying to get to 100,000 subscribers by mid-December of this year, or I owe all four of my friends dinner.

00:00:46.240 If I win, they four owe me dinner. I only won dinner. It was a really lopsided bet that I had made.

00:00:52.840 And then also leave a comment on what you think.

00:00:54.940 But do you, when you see this sign, it was a large sign that Pierre Polyev's campaign would put at the side of the road reminding people that when you go in to vote, vote with Pierre Polyev's first name and last name.

00:01:09.760 He has a bit of an oddly spelled last name.

00:01:12.900 So if you haven't done it before, you may not realize it's like, you know, that there's an I before the L and then there's another I after the L.

00:01:21.000 It doesn't sound like that's how it should be written.

00:01:24.040 But his campaign was putting up signs in order to, one, remind people to vote and then also give them a spelling of his name.

00:01:30.760 Does this sign strike you like it's made by Elections Canada?

00:01:35.360 If you said yes, you are not a real person because nobody on this planet would think that Elections Canada would put one of the leading candidates' names on their advertisement reminding people to write up a candidate's full name.

00:01:50.500 This is obviously from Pierre Polyev's campaign, and you are delusional to pretend that anyone would mistake this as some, like, order by Elections Canada to vote for Polyev.

00:02:01.120 But we have all these people from the left, a lot of anonymous accounts, obviously, but I've seen other more mainstream accounts also sharing this stuff.

00:02:08.780 They say, where does this campaign sign attribute its message to the campaign?

00:02:12.800 And there is a small piece of text somewhere in the campaign sign, I believe, that says where it's from, but that text isn't supposed to be massive so that someone can see it from the side of the road.

00:02:24.640 The whole point is if someone walks up to the sign inquiring on who the sign is from, they can find out.

00:02:30.640 But you shouldn't need to go find out who put up the sign because it says Pierre Polyev on it.

00:02:36.240 And I think we all know why a sign would have Pierre Polyev on it, because it's probably from his campaign.

00:02:41.320 And this Wendy Bee person has now went on to the Elections Canada website to find this rule that they think they're trying to interpret as making the sign illegal.

00:02:53.180 If it was illegal, Elections Canada would have already flagged it by now.

00:02:57.200 And by the way, later on, we're going to get to Bonnie Critchley, the Liberal-backed Independent candidate in Battle River Crowfoot, who came in a respectable second place.

00:03:05.940 That's good for an Independent. 0.60

00:03:07.060 She probably would have gotten less than 1% of the vote if she didn't have more than a million dollars of free advertising through the media, left-wing podcasts, and left-wing activists online. 0.72

00:03:18.620 But it was still respectable.

00:03:20.640 She went on CTV News to imply that Pierre Polyev was cheating, which is just glorious cope to behold.

00:03:27.500 So we are going to get to that in just a bit.

00:03:29.720 And then I actually want to talk about some other stuff that Pierre Polyev is doing, because the man is driving people up the wall right now, because the legacy media and the left cannot handle Pierre Polyev 2.0.

00:03:41.020 I also want to talk about a CBC News segment where, as soon as he gets back into office, they are immediately tone-policing him.

00:03:47.160 Right after he wins, now they have to tell you why, what he's saying is vulgar or whatever.

00:03:53.120 And it says on the Elections Canada website, are there any rules about the content of campaign signs?

00:03:59.220 And the Elections Canada rule states that the Canadian Elections Act does not regulate the content of campaign signs.

00:04:04.760 None of this indicates that this sign is illegal at all.

00:04:30.440 Again, you would be delusional to think that this sign is attempting to be an Elections Canada sign, as if the Elections Canada owns the color yellow.

00:04:39.740 I guess the Libertarian Party would be in big trouble if having yellow on your sign meant that you're trying to manipulate people.

00:04:46.400 But it just says that the Elections Act does not regulate the content of campaign signs.

00:04:51.360 You just need to be able to give contact information and show who the sign was created by.

00:04:56.240 It doesn't regulate that that has to be massive text on the sign saying paid for by the Peer Poly of campaign at this address.

00:05:03.360 It's just that if someone walked up to the campaign, they could figure out who put this thing up. 0.71

00:05:07.800 But again, that would only be that if somehow your campaign sign was really vague and they didn't know who this was advertising, like you suck at making campaign signs.

00:05:16.400 At least someone could walk up and see who it was, especially if you left your law and signs up after the election and they know who to penalize for just junking all their signs along the side of the road and not cleaning them up properly.

00:05:28.020 But now let's move over to the CTV News interview that Bonnie Critchley has done post-election.

00:05:35.000 And this makes me, it confirms a lot of what I assumed about Bonnie Critchley.

00:05:42.240 The lady is very CBC brained. 1.00

00:05:45.920 She has very generic, very hyperbolically anti-conservative opinions.

00:05:50.860 We've already seen this by her calling Peer Poly of a traitor and that Damien Couric has sold us out by giving up a seat for Peer Poly of, which is just how Canadian politics work.

00:05:59.740 And unless you're a liberal partisan, you're not going to get mad that a party leader is doing it.

00:06:04.240 It's something obvious that every party leader will do if they lose their seat.

00:06:07.720 William Lyon Mackenzie King, the longest ever serving prime minister of Canada, had to do it twice.

00:06:12.520 And we don't consider him some sort of like unpatriotic, you know, disrespecter of democracy.

00:06:17.980 We understand that a leader, especially a prime minister, needs to be in the House of Commons.

00:06:23.580 And so we will sort of make an, usually MPs will give a little more leeway so that they can get back into office.

00:06:30.360 But here is Bonnie Critchley saying that Peer Poly of, you know, cheated.

00:06:35.200 She's saying it, but not saying it.

00:06:37.320 There were shenanigans during election day, so I'm not 100% surprised on how everything turned out.

00:06:42.960 I am going to leave, whether it was legal or illegal, up to the Commissioner for Canadian Elections and the RCMP.

00:06:49.180 But there were mocked up Elections Canada signs that had the appropriate disclaimer in font about that big on a three by six foot sign in a different, slightly different shade of yellow than there was.

00:07:04.880 And then there was issues where DROs, sorry, Deputy Returning Officers were handing out the large print books only with all the parties up front and all the independents in the back.

00:07:16.460 Plus, there were some other issues reported by my scrutineers that have been reported to the Commissioner, yes.

00:07:22.960 Okay, goodness.

00:07:23.640 If someone's showing up to the polling station to vote, if your name isn't at the front of the list and they don't say, okay, well, where's Bonnie Critchley?

00:07:33.400 It's probably because they don't know who you are and they weren't going to vote for you.

00:07:36.700 Or do you think that just because a name is listed at the top, they're going to get more votes?

00:07:40.880 That's kind of a misnomer about how elections work.

00:07:43.140 Like, oh, you're an alpha, the alphabetical order is favoring you.

00:07:46.600 If that helps you, it helps you in such a obtusely minor way, it's not even worth mentioning.

00:07:52.420 But getting back to the idea like, oh, we are going to go to the election commissioner and see if this was illegal or not.

00:07:58.560 Elections Canada could see these signs in the riding.

00:08:01.100 They never issued some sort of citation.

00:08:03.080 There was never a news story saying that they had to take them down because it's not illegal.

00:08:07.640 Elections Act does not prevent you from having the color yellow on a sign saying people should vote for Pierre Polyev. 0.96

00:08:13.820 And again, if you are stupid enough to think that that is an order by Elections Canada that you must follow, show up to the voting station and vote for Pierre Polyev, 0.98

00:08:20.940 you are unqualified to vote. 0.99

00:08:23.140 But this is just epic amounts of cope from Bonnie Critchley, who did way better than she should have ever done.

00:08:30.660 If she actually was running a race with the normal amount of media coverage that any candidate in a local race gets,

00:08:36.800 she would have gone nowhere.

00:08:38.460 But she got to go on to big podcasts.

00:08:40.840 She was on CTV News.

00:08:42.360 She was on CBC The National with David Cochran on their flagship programs.

00:08:47.640 And she only got 9.8%, 9.7%. 0.89

00:08:51.020 I don't know the exact number.

00:08:53.220 Respectable, although a lot of those votes just came from the Liberal and the NDP candidate,

00:08:56.660 who had basically a lot of their supporters activated to support Bonnie as some, you know, screw you to Pierre Polyev.

00:09:03.240 I think she truly thought that her prediction and people like Max Fawcett's predictions were right,

00:09:08.980 that she wasn't going to win, but she was going to hold Pierre Polyev down to like a 55%, a 60% win only,

00:09:16.340 and it was going to embarrass him.

00:09:17.980 And when it in fact shows that, no, he actually is popular, well, there must have been shenanigans.

00:09:23.280 People were manipulated.

00:09:24.340 It's not democracy unless I do well.

00:09:28.620 Well, the left tends to have that a lot, that people's real opinions were not, you know, spoken.

00:09:35.540 They were not heard.

00:09:36.460 The real opinions of the general public were not heard unless it's a left-wing outcome.

00:09:40.540 And I would advise you, if you're on the conservative side of politics, never do this.

00:09:45.260 Never have an election go one way and be like, well, see, it just proves that everyone's just being lied to or blah, blah, blah.

00:09:51.360 It's like, or your side just didn't campaign very well.

00:09:53.560 Oh, hey, look, the number went up, 76, 900.

00:09:56.940 We just crossed the 7C 6.9, the first time that's ever happened in a video, and I got to point at it.

00:10:03.560 But now let's jump over to the CBC News segment, because I find this just kind of slightly repulsive,

00:10:10.200 that right after Polyev gets back into office, we immediately jump into the mode of, well, is Polyev, is he too mean still?

00:10:17.840 Is Polyev too mean?

00:10:19.460 And then I want to jump over to things that Polyev is saying right now and explain that, no, he's not being mean.

00:10:24.100 He doesn't have a tone issue.

00:10:25.020 He's actually doing exactly what he should be doing, which is going hard on the issues that people care about.

00:10:31.380 The problem with the conservative campaign in 2025, the general election, was it went soft.

00:10:36.660 We're going to cut taxes a little bit more than liberals.

00:10:38.880 We're going to lower immigration a little bit more than liberals.

00:10:41.580 We're going to deregulate somewhat.

00:10:44.720 We're going to cut some spending.

00:10:46.340 And it's like you've got to go for it.

00:10:48.420 You've got to go for it if you want to drive out your base, because your base is only going to show up in large numbers,

00:10:54.400 like in the numbers that you need to win when they can imagine their lives being transformed by you getting into office.

00:11:00.980 That's why you cut taxes.

00:11:02.200 Not by, you know, two and a quarter percent underneath $50,000.

00:11:07.060 You cut all taxes across the board, including corporate, by 20, 25 percent, because that's the amount of money where a family who's making $150,000 a year, but they're still struggling.

00:11:18.340 They've got three kids.

00:11:19.160 Their mortgage is pretty high.

00:11:20.760 They can imagine, OK, we can actually go on that family vacation now.

00:11:23.900 You know, maybe we can pay for the first year of university for all of our kids like we always wanted to.

00:11:29.660 That's what you've got to do with tax policy.

00:11:31.600 And that works the same way with cultural issues, social issues, foreign policy.

00:11:35.780 You've got to have a different perspective where people can imagine life being different when you're in office, not just better, because better is abstract.

00:11:43.580 They want it to be completely different.

00:11:45.980 I wake up in the morning not stressed out, and we have that vacation booked in six months.

00:11:50.520 We can easily afford it.

00:11:51.620 I don't stress about that.

00:11:53.260 And I don't pay $35,000 in taxes anymore.

00:11:56.560 I pay $29,000.

00:11:58.100 And it's like the literal front number is smaller than the other one before.

00:12:04.320 Like, that's what you want.

00:12:05.520 That the $10,000 place number is one lower at the very least.

00:12:11.080 I used to pay $40,000.

00:12:12.420 Now I pay $32,000.

00:12:14.040 That's when people feel like everything is much different.

00:12:17.500 But now I'm starting this clip off with Tim Powers here, who is the conservative on the panel.

00:12:25.220 And I'm just showing you the end of his statement on their panel.

00:12:30.300 They're going to go to the woman who is a strategist for the liberals or a former strategist and has worked with ministers, liberal ministers in the past.

00:12:39.100 But this really shows you the caliber of the type of conservative that the CBC will actually allow on their shows.

00:12:45.300 I miss Anthony Koch being on the CBC because that guy was actually fun.

00:12:50.420 He was actually conservative.

00:12:51.780 He pushed back on other panelists.

00:12:53.440 And this guy just has these generic, yeah, poor soup in my lap and I'll apologize to you kind of opinions about how Polyev needs to be very careful not to have, you know, tonal issues.

00:13:03.240 People elected Carney.

00:13:04.360 So he should be nice to him.

00:13:06.160 He's like, well, once if Carney messes up, well, you can criticize.

00:13:09.020 You just got to get the tone right.

00:13:10.380 It's like this is why conservatives lose.

00:13:12.860 Screw that.

00:13:13.600 But if he's doing something wrong, if Carney is doing something wrong, you whack him on for it.

00:13:18.760 Because if you actually want to do your job as opposition and make the country better, even without getting into office, you hit the government as hard as possible every time they make a mistake so that they stop making those mistakes and start making better decisions.

00:13:31.020 Or the Canadian public loses faith in the government, not being able to react to your good faith critiques.

00:13:36.700 And then they will put you in government instead.

00:13:39.260 But here's Tim Powers.

00:13:40.000 We still seem to be in a moment whereby we are dealing with the President of the United States, who's unpredictable, who's wieldy, who Canadians have vested Mark Carney with the opportunity to deal with him.

00:13:53.580 That doesn't mean he can't criticize Mark Carney.

00:13:56.420 Doesn't mean he shouldn't criticize Mark Carney.

00:13:58.720 But I think he's going to have to work on the tonality of that.

00:14:02.560 Isn't that a great Ottawa word, the tonality?

00:14:05.060 Love it.

00:14:05.860 It's the problem with Ottawa.

00:14:07.420 What is this wet blanket way of doing politics?

00:14:10.460 Well, you can criticize, but you need to temper yourself.

00:14:14.500 You need to focus on your tonality.

00:14:16.940 It's like, my goodness, just make a sharp criticism.

00:14:21.760 Don't be mean.

00:14:22.720 Don't be mean-spirited.

00:14:23.900 Don't be cruel and nasty.

00:14:25.800 But when someone's doing something wrong, you state your position firmly, and then you move on to the next issue.

00:14:32.020 You don't do this kind of like, well, I'm going to let the Prime Minister have some room here.

00:14:36.400 I have some concerns.

00:14:37.620 What does that mean?

00:14:39.260 But let's move on to now the liberal on the panel who goes full into tone policing.

00:14:43.080 Stevie, I wanted to ask, is it just that he can't help himself, or is this a strategy that we're seeing today?

00:14:52.440 I'm probably not the only liberal whose stomach kind of urch when we start hearing those sorts of slogans and attacks and repetitive, more of the same, Paliyev.

00:15:03.880 I think he can't help himself.

00:15:05.520 I think it is not a good strategy to go to what didn't work during the election.

00:15:11.300 What are they talking about what didn't work during the election?

00:15:13.920 What didn't work during the election is the sort of things that Tim Powers and her would tell Paliyev to do if they were wanting him to win, supposedly.

00:15:20.940 No, he lost because the campaign became dull.

00:15:25.060 It became repetitive, but not in a repetitive way where he's too negative.

00:15:28.680 It became too, I don't really know.

00:15:31.240 And that's the problem.

00:15:31.940 I didn't really get a core message in the campaign.

00:15:34.580 There were different demographic groups I didn't think that were given something like really hard to actually grab hold of on that campaign to vote.

00:15:43.100 I think the conservatives kind of lost upper income people as well as retired voters.

00:15:47.560 They did really well where they had a really specific message for them, for voters, and they really pushed their message hard.

00:15:54.680 In like Newfoundland, when they went for fishermen and they wanted to bring back the seal hunt and raise fishing quotas, they did well there.

00:16:02.300 With Asian voters in Richmond and the GTA, when they pushed hard on drugs and crime, they did very well with those voters.

00:16:09.680 Working class voters.

00:16:10.940 Paliyev modeled a more working class style.

00:16:13.780 He was like, you know, talking about actually wanting to deregulate, get rid of things like EV mandates.

00:16:19.900 He was against our social justice woke type stuff.

00:16:23.420 That's what got those blue collar workers who oftentimes had never voted conservative in their life to come over and we won ridings like Windsor.

00:16:30.720 But no, it wasn't.

00:16:32.780 Yeah, the problem was repetition during the campaign, but it's not in the way that she thinks that the repetition was the problem.

00:16:39.200 It was too mild and repetitive.

00:16:41.560 It wasn't like he was too punchy.

00:16:43.400 He's going back to the 2022, 2023 Paliyev that got him the attention and national acclaim in the first place.

00:16:50.760 Whereas in 25, early on, he was kind of soft and it was like, well, this isn't a guy who would smash Sheree 68% to like 16%.

00:17:00.120 It feels like a guy who would have to go second ballot with Sheree.

00:17:03.440 And we're back to first ballot, you know, Pierre Paliyev 2.0.

00:17:07.240 To beat on the, you know, the same horse.

00:17:11.380 I think if there's ever a time to be collaborative and to work together in a bipartisan way would be at the beginning of a mandate when there's a national crisis.

00:17:21.580 He can build a lot of goodwill this way.

00:17:23.340 I don't think the critiques of Carney ring as true as maybe the critiques of Trudeau did.

00:17:31.280 And so I think he hurts his own credibility when he makes such, when his statements come down, they're not authentic.

00:17:40.100 Let's be very clear with the position that Mark Carney is currently in.

00:17:43.600 This person is basically saying, well, it's in Paliye's best interest not to attack Carney, but she's the liberal on the panel.

00:17:49.840 It's in Carney's best interest to not be attacked so much by Pierre Paliyev because with this Air Canada situation, with the budget, with him going around and just meeting low-level politicians without actually engaging on the trade deal with Donald Trump, with all of the other stumbles that this liberal government has had, of course she wants Paliyev not to attack Carney.

00:18:10.100 Carney is stumbling all over the place right now.

00:18:13.280 It's like watching Joe Biden walk up in airplanes' stairs.

00:18:17.520 It's not very good.

00:18:18.680 And the idea that Paliyev is going to score points by being conciliatory for no reason, by standing by and holding the towel for Mark Carney and giving him a back rub between rounds of getting absolutely destroyed by reality, by the American trade negotiators and reality in general. 0.99

00:18:41.700 No, it's not good for Paliyev to back the stupid plays of Carney. 0.94

00:18:45.100 Sherelle, what did you think when you saw his appearance today and his speech and then... 0.97

00:18:51.840 This person's from the Hill Times and the fact they're from the Hill Times usually means they're going to be pretty hard left, so I assume that they're filling in the NDP quotient of this panel.

00:19:00.640 How he answered questions.

00:19:01.880 I mean, I think everybody thought, okay, that shift in tone that he'd been talking about or we were wondering if it was going to be coming, it's not really there.

00:19:13.060 Because, yes, after the election in April and after, you know, just on Monday night, he was talking about being more collaborative.

00:19:20.380 And even today as well, he was saying, to give him, you know, some credit, he said, again, that we're not just going to be opposing.

00:19:29.840 He said, we're going to propose solutions, which is something that people have been asking for.

00:19:35.020 They say, we don't want to just hear negativity.

00:19:37.540 We want to hear you come up with something.

00:19:39.140 To say that it's nonpartisan solutions and things like that, I think that's going a step too far, because it is clearly just the things that the Conservative Party wants to see in terms of repealing certain natural resource regulations and laws having to do with getting, you know, oil across the country and out to market.

00:20:00.260 And, you know, all of these...

00:20:02.260 These two people's faces really strike me as the mood of the panel.

00:20:06.240 This is the dullest...

00:20:09.140 ...analysis I've ever seen.

00:20:11.280 I've ever heard in my life.

00:20:12.540 It's like, well, you know, but he's going to be offering a lot of partisan stuff and it would be good if you're like, well, of course he's going to offer partisan stuff.

00:20:19.760 He's the Conservative Party leader.

00:20:21.060 Was he going to offer nonpartisan legislation?

00:20:23.160 There's no such thing.

00:20:24.100 These projects are going to fall into everybody's lap as soon as that happens, because if he was Prime Minister, as he said today, he'd be negotiating with the United States President from a position of strength because he would have done all these things already.

00:20:36.760 And, you know, in six months, Carney has made things worse.

00:20:41.040 I don't know if that's necessarily the message people want to hear, but it is also capitalizing on the fact that Carney has made some missteps, you know, looking at the Air Canada strike.

00:20:54.160 People aren't necessarily, you know, glowing when it comes to the Prime Minister and the Liberal government as a whole.

00:21:01.020 So who knew the lady from the Hill Times and who's probably the more lefty on the panel is the most rational.

00:21:07.800 You know what?

00:21:08.100 She won me back over at that last little bit, actually bringing up some failures of the Carney government.

00:21:13.360 But again, it's not smart just to sit idly by while Carney messes up as if, again, like she can say, I'm not sure if it's necessarily true that we would be in a position of strength that Polly was in charge.

00:21:24.800 But it's like, OK, but rhetorically, you can't really fault the guy for saying that when the guy that who was the man with the plan supposedly is messing up all over the place.

00:21:33.760 But now I just want to jump over to something that Pierre Polyev just posted that I think is demonstrating that, yes, we actually are getting Pierre Polyev 2.0 now, which in effect is actually 2022 Polyev who's more aggressive.

00:21:47.000 And Polyev says the Toronto Police Association agrees instead of going after illegal weapons and criminals, the Mark Carney Liberals are targeting law abiding hunters, farmers and sport shooters with their multi-billion dollar gun grab boondoggle and then secure our border, lock up gun smugglers and criminals and leave law abiding Canadians alone.

00:22:05.940 And he posted this also on the same day that he was going after the for going after prosecutors for trying to lock somebody up for charging somebody for beating an intruder almost to death in their house, which I believe is their right.

00:22:21.580 You break into somebody's house and you enter their room when they're asleep.

00:22:25.140 Yeah, you might almost get you might almost get killed by the person's fists and feet.

00:22:29.740 And Polyev in the aftermath of that says your home, your family, your life. 0.99

00:22:34.740 If someone breaks in, you deserve the right to defend your loved ones and your property full stop. 0.60

00:22:39.880 And I hope that they are then going to propose the Conservative Party is going to propose some sort of a castle doctrine law in Canada saying that, yes, if someone comes into your house and you have to, you know, shoot them or you have to, you know, hit them with something and they die.

00:22:55.180 Well, that's their fault. You don't break into somebody's home.

00:22:57.800 But of course, the fake Conservative Andrew Coyne thinks this is all very bad.

00:23:03.480 And he says, quote, a struggle broke out, leaving the alleged intruder with life threatening injuries.

00:23:09.660 And he this and he's commenting on the actual story.

00:23:12.880 And Ford, Doug Ford, who I don't even like, even came in down on the right side of this issue saying, absolutely.

00:23:18.460 You know, if you broke into my house at night, you'd be in for a fight.

00:23:21.220 And but Andrew Coyne's commentary on this whole situation says you're allowed to defend yourself with reasonable force.

00:23:27.620 You're not allowed to beat the guy to death.

00:23:30.720 OK, Andrew, whatever.

00:23:33.040 You can say that from your like, you know, from your skyscraper, from your gated community.

00:23:37.940 But if someone actually entered your home and they had a weapon or they were trying to hurt you and you had a gun, would you not pull the trigger?

00:23:46.560 Really, Andrew Coyne?

00:23:47.980 Although I would be very skeptical of Andrew Coyne has the strength to actually pull a trigger.

00:23:53.460 But regardless, I think Andrew Coyne probably would choose not to die in favor of actually defending his life.

00:24:00.100 You know, maybe we maybe weird idea, guys, maybe we shouldn't be soft on criminality.

00:24:05.800 Maybe we should actually take stuff like that seriously.

00:24:08.820 But anyways, that should be it for this video, guys.

00:24:11.800 Hopefully you enjoyed the show.

00:24:13.120 Make sure to like the video, subscribe, leave a comment and actually share.

00:24:16.920 I noticed back in July when I ran the numbers in July, people actually share videos a lot, which I appreciate.

00:24:22.360 I think in July there was like 4000 people had shared a video because I don't usually share videos because naturally I, you know,

00:24:29.360 I guess I technically do share videos because I post them to different social media platforms.

00:24:33.100 Anyways, I'm a I'm a soldier in the trench with you guys also sharing my own content.

00:24:37.680 But if you can keep that up, it's been really helping the channel growth.

00:24:40.660 And I'll see you guys all next time.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - August 21, 2025

Sore Loser Bonnie Critchley implies Poilievre Cheated!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript