The Liberal Smear Campaign: All Conservatives = Traitors to Canada?
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
176.29082
Summary
In the wake of Matt Jenner crossing the floor to join the Liberal Party, the legacy media and the party smell blood in the water, and they want to smear all Conservatives as being traitors for not jumping on board with Mark Carney's Liberal government.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here, and welcome back to the National Telegraph YouTube channel.
00:00:06.180
In the aftermath of former Conservative MP Matt Jenneru crossing the floor and joining
00:00:11.640
Mark Carney's Liberals, I have noticed a substantial uptick in the amount of anti-Conservative
00:00:17.980
propaganda coming out of the legacy media. I know the legacy media is already synonymous
00:00:24.100
with being a Liberal Party front group, but I think it has gotten so much more blatant
00:00:29.600
in the past few days because the legacy media and the Liberal Party smell blood in the water
00:00:35.540
after Matt Jenneru crossed the floor, and they want to try and smear all Conservatives
00:00:40.400
as being traitors to the country for not jumping on board with Mark Carney's Liberal government.
00:00:47.180
There's this stupid game that's being played that because Mark Carney is opposing Donald Trump,
00:00:52.860
that means if you're not on Team Mark Carney, then you are somehow a traitor, even if you are trying
00:00:58.560
to help Mark Carney deal with Donald Trump as Conservative MP Jamil Giovanni did, and then was
00:01:04.660
blatantly smeared by the legacy media. So in just a second here, I want to get to some absolutely
00:01:10.560
insane examples of the sorts of things the Liberal media is platforming right now, but before we get
00:01:17.080
into it, I just want to remind you guys, if you like the show, make sure to leave a like on this video,
00:01:22.540
subscribe if you are not yet a subscriber, leave a comment about what you think about this mess.
00:01:28.520
I always try and go through several dozen comments, read what people are saying, and respond to a
00:01:32.940
smattering of people. I can't respond to everyone, of course, because some videos have like a thousand
00:01:36.980
comments, and eventually I can kind of categorize them into about 10 different bins of the same type
00:01:43.700
of comment. But anyways, and then if you also want to support the channel financially, you can always hit
00:01:48.960
the join button below the video and make a monthly contribution to make the channel more sustainable
00:01:53.640
for me and make me less reliant on the YouTube algorithm. But let's get into our first clip here,
00:01:59.940
and here we have the Liberal strategist David Hurley on CBC News talking about Matt Jenner crossing the
00:02:09.280
floor and how the Conservatives are basically all mega at this point. Now, I am not upset that the
00:02:17.140
legacy media has a Liberal strategist on, have anyone you want on. The problem is they don't
00:02:22.560
really ever have Conservative people on outside of the obligatory, like, I guess, appearances of
00:02:30.720
Conservative party, like, communications people. They kind of have to have them on, but they don't
00:02:35.980
have just Conservative commentators on to say anything. The ones they have on panels who are
00:02:41.700
supposed to be the Conservatives are people like Andrew Coyne or Fred DeLore, who are not
00:02:46.560
Conservative at all, but a, you know, full-blooded Liberal like David Hurley, of course, is allowed
00:02:52.780
on, and he can say whatever he wants with no challenge from anyone else.
00:02:56.560
I think it's different from other floor crossings generally, because I think this is indicative of
00:03:03.680
a very large schism that's going on inside that political party. We're having some dramatic
00:03:10.080
political events in Canada around our relationship with the United States and around possible
00:03:17.040
separatist referendums in Quebec and Alberta, and I think that party, which is a coalition
00:03:24.160
of Western reformers and old progressive Conservatives, is having a very difficult time managing both of
00:03:33.280
those issues. And its current leadership is that Western reform wing of the coalition. And, you know,
00:03:42.640
so frankly, they're mega. They're mega-sympathetic, mega-adjacent.
00:03:47.360
What does he even mean by that? Like, first, we have to go back in his claim about there's a schism
00:03:54.560
inside the Conservative party right now. Evidence? Evidence? You can say, well, people are crossing the floor.
00:04:00.640
Okay, well, give me a citation that would convince me that those people left because of a political schism
00:04:08.240
inside the party. Chris Dontremont, the best information we have is that he left because he wasn't
00:04:13.600
given the deputy speaker role and the extra $50,000 a year that comes with that position. Someone else was
00:04:19.520
made the deputy speaker inside the Conservative party, and he got mad and felt unappreciated, and he left.
00:04:25.280
He can say, well, I just think it's time for us to, you know, unify the country behind Mark Carney. I
00:04:32.880
think he's done some good stuff. But these people can't cite anything but just microwave liberal propaganda
00:04:38.880
for why they're shifting over. Michael Ma said, oh, well, Mark Carney's a unifier. He's a strong leader, and we
00:04:46.960
need stability right now. Like, what? That's nothing. That's a popcorn fart of a reason for
00:04:54.080
crossing the floor. And now with Matt Jenneru, he says, oh, well, Mark Carney's Davos speech is why I
00:05:00.320
left. His Davos speech was basically his old campaign propaganda put on at the World Economic Forum.
00:05:07.600
That's all that happened there. Shouldn't he have left way sooner if the Davos speech was enough to
00:05:13.040
make him cross? Clearly, that's not why he actually crossed. Now, maybe these people have personal
00:05:18.000
problems with the Conservative party leadership, but I don't see an ideological schism like David Hurley's
00:05:24.400
trying to claim here. And then the claim that these people are mega and mega sympathetic. What do you
00:05:31.280
mean by that? Dude, explain. What do you think that they want America to win? They want Canada to be
00:05:38.240
annexed? They want to lose a trade war? You couldn't actually credibly accuse any of these people of
00:05:45.200
somehow not wanting Canada to get rid of the tariffs and for us to have, you know, a better economy and,
00:05:50.880
you know, to not have our jobs taken by the United States. None of them believe that. So he's staying
00:05:56.480
vague and just saying, well, they're mega, mega sympathetic. Is he saying that there are
00:06:01.040
some people in the Conservative party, I'd probably say a little more than half, who like a lot of the
00:06:05.200
policies of Donald Trump? Okay, well, that's not controversial. That's basically saying Conservatives
00:06:09.840
like Conservative policy, and much of Donald Trump's policy is conservative. Now, I don't like the tariff
00:06:15.440
policy, but I like other policies of his. I like a lot of the immigration policy. I like a lot of social
00:06:20.080
policy. I like his domestic tax policy. Does this mean I'm now mega sympathetic? I'm just a
00:06:27.520
conservative. That's just what it's being called. Like, I'm like a gold water conservative, which would
00:06:33.520
mean that I like a lot of what Trump does. I like a lot of what Margaret Thatcher did. I like a lot of what
00:06:37.840
Georgia Maloney does in Italy right now. But again, they're trying to just throw that mega word out as
00:06:43.520
much as possible to scare voters in the middle who don't really follow politics enough to have, like, very
00:06:49.680
strong, coherent thoughts, and get them over to the Liberal camp out of fear that the Conservatives could give away the
00:06:55.520
country to the mega Republicans. Whether that's Paulie F himself or Andrew Scheer or Jenny Byrne or
00:07:02.960
Michelle Rempel, people that are kind of in charge are very sympathetic. Well, it's not surprising then
00:07:08.240
that there'd be lots of other members that are uncomfortable with that. That's very funny to accuse
00:07:14.400
any of those people of being like mega people. I think the closest person to being like that side of
00:07:21.520
conservatism would maybe be Andrew Scheer because he is a more socially conservative and fiscally
00:07:27.120
conservative guy. But again, that would just be describing the fact that he's a very strong
00:07:32.480
conservative. Michelle Rempel as a mega conservative? No. If anything, Michelle Rempel every couple years
00:07:39.680
does some extremely liberal things and then ends up getting in hot water with conservative members,
00:07:44.960
like when that one time where she, like, attacked people who are protesting in favor of parental rights.
00:07:50.480
No. Jenny Byrne is not a mega conservative. I wish she was more like that. But again, that's just me,
00:07:56.720
basically me saying I wish she was more conservative. But goodness gracious, all basically,
00:08:02.160
again, what David Hurley is trying to do is throwing as many darts hoping that he can affect the
00:08:07.360
consciences of sensitive people and get them to move over to the Liberals because they don't want to be
00:08:11.920
called mega by hacks like David Hurley who runs a podcast that nobody listens to. Especially as
00:08:18.000
Carney carves out sort of a very pro-Canada positioning. And the referendums present similar
00:08:24.320
problems. So I think that the next couple of years are really going to be difficult for that party
00:08:29.920
and floor crossings may be the least of their problems. Oh, it's going to be the least of their
00:08:34.880
problems there. Again, give me a citation to prove to me that Matt Jenneru left because of ideological
00:08:41.760
reasons and it wasn't personal petty issues that he had with people inside the party.
00:08:46.000
It proved to me that Chris Dontremont really just fell in love with what Mark Carney was doing
00:08:52.000
because all these people were condemning what Carney was doing like five seconds before they left.
00:08:56.880
Now, maybe that just says something about Canadian politics that so many MPs are handed a script
00:09:02.000
and they read it and they sit back down and they don't care about what they read. I work for Dallas
00:09:07.040
Brody at the BC legislature and the funny thing is whenever there's like a debate going on on a bill,
00:09:12.800
you are allowed to speak for 30 minutes and we always find it suspicious how members of every
00:09:17.680
party always seem to be able to go on for 30 minutes. And to us, it always feels like either they're
00:09:24.000
artificially just sitting there wasting time or they are using AI extended speeches where they just
00:09:29.840
type in all the topics, all the points they want to hit and it generates them a 30 minute long
00:09:34.000
script to talk about because Dallas always keeps it pretty short. So there is something to be said
00:09:39.040
that so many members of parliament and members of legislative assemblies are on just autopilot mode.
00:09:45.200
They talk as long as they are supposed to talk for their communications. People give them a script
00:09:50.480
and that's how it works. At 1BC, I can guarantee we do not do that. In fact, we hate scripts and we try
00:09:56.240
and keep them as short as possible or we just use bullet points because Dallas knows how to talk on her own.
00:10:02.720
Anyways, so let's get into this next clip. Oh my goodness, it is a panel hosted by Rosemary
00:10:09.040
Barton, so you know it's not going to be great. But I believe this is Andrew Coyne talking here who,
00:10:13.920
again, is supposedly a conservative on the panel. Again, just attacking conservatives.
00:10:19.840
Well, it's not just the leader. It's the party and the leader are both under a lot of pressure.
00:10:25.120
And the pressure is Donald Trump. Every time Donald Trump erupts and says something nasty,
00:10:31.120
liberals go up in the polls, the conservatives go down. They know, at least some of them know,
00:10:36.000
they have to address that. They have to take a firmer stand. But they can't, they feel because
00:10:41.760
the significant section of their party is actually pretty okay with Donald Trump.
00:10:44.960
And why is it not okay to be all right with Donald Trump? You're not saying super fans all right.
00:10:55.040
They're not saying that they like the things he does in regards to Canada. They don't like the
00:10:58.640
tariffs. You know, the 50 for state thing was funny as a joke. And you should probably stop because
00:11:04.160
people who don't follow meme culture on social media can be bothered by the fact that he has
00:11:09.600
canned it on a map with the American flag over it. It's a joke. He shouldn't do that because a lot
00:11:16.720
of people don't get it. And they'll just freak out because they're primed to freak out. But can he
00:11:20.960
actually describe what about people who appreciate certain policies of Donald Trump? Why is that bad?
00:11:28.000
There are people do do sorry, liberals not appreciate the policies of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris,
00:11:33.840
or Barack Obama or Bill Clinton or Jimmy Carter? Or like whoever else? FDR? Oh, does that make them?
00:11:43.520
Does that make them Americans now? Or is it just they ideologically agree with certain things they do?
00:11:48.320
Have this ridiculous situation where Jamil Giovanni goes down to Washington, and effectively takes the side of
00:11:54.560
Donald Trump on a number of issues, portrays them as sympathetic and reasonable, portrays Canadians
00:12:00.240
as being engaged in a hissy fit, etc. I'm all in favor of MPs being able to speak their mind. It's
00:12:05.280
fine to criticize the government of the day. But when you go down and take the side of the government
00:12:09.760
that is attempting at the very least to destroy the trade agreement, possibly to annex the country,
00:12:14.080
you've crossed a few lines. What? He's trying to annex. And this is the thing. Guys, the CBC,
00:12:20.880
you would assume, if you are an outsider, that if it's going to be the state funded broadcast,
00:12:26.880
or it's going to be where there is serious commentary, maybe it's even kind of dry. Now,
00:12:31.600
it is dry. But you would think it would be the world of sober minded political analysis. We're
00:12:38.480
going to keep the hyperbole out of it. If that was their mandate. Fine. You know, we'll have actual
00:12:45.120
conservatives on actual liberals on and they'll debate the issues. And they're just told not to turn this into
00:12:50.560
you know, into just hyperbolic jousting between each other. But like this, the CBC is in fact,
00:12:58.880
the home of some of the most overheated rhetoric. Look at Jenny Byrne sitting here smiling while
00:13:05.360
this is all going on, too. She loves all of this, all the anti conservative attacks they're being able
00:13:10.400
to engage in this week over the day. But when you go down and take the side of the government that is
00:13:15.440
attempting at the very least to destroy the trade agreement, possibly to annex the country.
00:13:18.960
Jameel didn't do that. Citation, please. He said what Donald Trump had said. He's saying that Donald
00:13:26.000
Trump doesn't hate Canada. The Americans don't hate Canada. That's just true. Donald Trump probably
00:13:30.960
doesn't think about us that much. He thinks about us sometimes. But the idea that somehow Jameel
00:13:35.760
Javani was acting as a traitor to the country for not engaging in hyperbole, anti American hyperbole,
00:13:43.040
is foolish. He can not like certain things America America is doing, but he can also be smart enough
00:13:48.160
to keep a sober mind about how to deal with it. And that's what Andrew Coyne is trying to skewer him
00:13:53.440
for. You've crossed a few lines and it's very damaging to the party's brand. They know it, at least
00:13:59.840
again, the sensible ones do. But what actual consequences followed for Jameel Javani? Very little.
00:14:05.920
Slap on the wrist at most. What does he want? Him kicked out of caucus for going down to the United
00:14:10.480
States and trying to do Mark Carney's job for him? A job Mark Carney's not even attempting to do?
00:14:15.840
So you've got that. You've got these four crossings and nobody seems to think they're at an end.
00:14:20.960
You've got a very divided party. And Mr. Boyeva is, to some extent, the victim of that,
00:14:28.640
They say a very divided party. Divided on what? Can we get a MP, even anonymously on the record,
00:14:36.800
who's still part of the party, saying that they are queasy with things being done? Is there anyone
00:14:41.520
doing that? No. Even the floor crossers couldn't actually name something they had a problem with,
00:14:47.760
because you can't actually find anything that Polyev has done where you could say,
00:14:51.760
oh, he's being too friendly to the Americans. He's not taking the trade situation seriously now.
00:14:56.800
The conservatives are taking it more seriously than Mark Carney, who won't deal with it, my goodness.
00:15:02.320
Anyway, but now let's move on to some other stuff. Here's just one I wanted to highlight because of
00:15:06.560
how childish it was. So Wayne Gretzky was on the CBC here, and he says, I'm a hockey player. I'm a
00:15:14.400
Canadian, a true Canadian. I want Canada to win a gold medal. I've never wavered from that. I've been
00:15:19.840
friends with prime ministers and presidents. Somehow there's been a little bit more tension than normal.
00:15:25.440
At the end of the day, Canada and the US are like brothers and sisters. They're going to fight and
00:15:29.120
argue, but eventually they'll come together. That's the way I see it. And Bruce Anderson here,
00:15:34.080
who is the head of a polling company, says, nope, not buying it. So even when a conservative figure,
00:15:43.200
someone who's like a conservative coded celebrity, like Wayne Gretzky, says that he's a proud Canadian,
00:15:50.560
of course, I'm fundamentally a Canadian. We're attacking him because he had gone to,
00:15:55.280
I believe, Donald Trump's inauguration because he's friends with people in the United States,
00:15:59.840
and I think he's friendly with Trump. That's not allowed, apparently. We have Andrew Coyne here
00:16:05.280
over this article from the National Post that reads, why are liberals attacking efforts to end Canada's
00:16:10.960
terror for full comment podcast? And it's featuring Jamil Javani. And Andrew Coyne says,
00:16:17.120
Javani has many prominent supporters on the right. Okay. Like, is this a bad thing that
00:16:25.440
he was on the National Post and they actually heard out what he was saying?
00:16:30.080
Another one, right? Oh, here's another thing I wanted to play right here. This is from Laura Babcock.
00:16:37.920
She's not as representative of the mainstream media in general, although her husband is a producer over
00:16:42.720
at the CBC. But this is the sort of unhinged rhetoric we're getting. We have Clinton DeVoe
00:16:47.920
on her show, again, talking about all, again, attacking conservatives and doing this whole maple
00:16:53.760
mega fascist type routine. Yeah. And it's populist, it's disingenuous, and it's what Trump did in the U.S.
00:17:03.200
She's going after Danielle Smith here, the Premier of Alberta, for wanting Alberta to be able to
00:17:08.720
control some of its own immigration, and wanting the government to crack down on people who are
00:17:14.000
illegally in Canada. This is what she's freaking out about for context.
00:17:17.920
...scapegoated the immigrants in the U.S., and we have seen disastrous consequences from that.
00:17:24.320
73,000 people are right now in prison camps, which one of them, an Irish person who was dragged in there
00:17:31.680
because he had a funny accent, according to ICE, called torture. Torture. They're lucky if they
00:17:37.040
get sunlight during a 24-hour day. They're underfed. They're being tortured. So that is what happens
00:17:44.320
when you demonize immigration. When you talk about, like, what happens if the people of Alberta say,
00:17:50.000
oh yeah, no, we don't want any more of these immigrants. What's next? You're going to say, oh,
00:17:53.840
well, you know, we've got to go to a roundup of immigrants. I mean, I'm sorry to put it that way,
00:17:57.760
but there's nothing in Danielle Smith's policies and her adjacency to MAGA and all the time she
00:18:03.440
spends with those leaders who espouse these things. That doesn't lead me to be deeply concerned.
00:18:09.200
First, you take away their access to health care in the province. Then what happens? People start
00:18:14.080
to say, oh, well, I saw them at a job my kid could have had. We need to be rounding up these people and
00:18:18.480
getting them out of Alberta. I mean, this stuff is disastrous when you start to lose your common
00:18:24.800
humanity. Sorry, common humanity requires us to never enforce basic law. If we start to enforce
00:18:32.320
the basic immigration law that you should only be here for the time your visa allows you to be here,
00:18:38.400
then we're losing our basic humanity, apparently. And your values and you buy into this
00:18:43.520
bullshit line that these people who came to work to contribute are the ones who are causing you pain.
00:18:49.920
It is not true. I'm sorry, but it is true that disproportionately new immigrants in Canada
00:18:56.720
are the ones who are part of gangs in Toronto, in Surrey, who are involved in extortion rackets.
00:19:03.920
That's just true. So I'm sorry, it's just not a bunch of random white hockey guys going around
00:19:11.360
shooting up things. The guys who have been, the family's been here for a couple of generations.
00:19:15.520
Now, that doesn't mean that all immigrants are criminals. Obviously not. But the thing is,
00:19:21.280
those who are overstaying student visas or getting into the country on false pretenses are, in fact,
00:19:27.840
contributing heavily to the rise in crime. And we should have those people deported. But apparently,
00:19:32.800
even noticing basic facts is now racist, fascist, maple mega to Laura Babcock.
00:19:40.240
And she might not have used that language as distinctly as Trump did. But believe me,
00:19:45.840
this is not just Danielle Smith up there on her bully pulpit full of grievance. She is getting a
00:19:52.400
hell of a lot of help from the people in the United States in MAGA. There is literally a sign up in
00:19:58.080
Arizona for the independence referendum in Alberta. There's an event happening in Juma, Arizona.
00:20:04.480
That's not that's not mega helping Daniel's. Okay, Daniel Smith is not even a separatist.
00:20:10.240
She's not. She's explicitly not a separatist. There is a sign up in Yuma, because there's a lot
00:20:16.320
of people in Alberta who snow who are snowbirds who live in Arizona during the winter. That's what's
00:20:22.800
going on there. It's not a conspiracy theory. A bunch of people in Yuma basically said, hey, if you're an
00:20:28.560
Albertan who's here traveling, you can come to our house or whatever and sign the petition. That's all
00:20:36.000
that was. And now she's already this is the mind of Laura Babcock. It doesn't if something she does
00:20:42.640
not like something, it is inherently attached to something else she does not like. She does not
00:20:47.440
like Trump. And she so she hates his immigration policy. If Daniel Smith starts taking immigration
00:20:53.520
issues seriously, that means she's like Donald Trump. And you know that she is working with
00:21:01.280
the Americans because she agrees with Donald Trump. And didn't you see there was a separatist sign up
00:21:06.160
that was happening in Arizona. And because it's something to do with Alberta in Arizona and Laura
00:21:11.840
Babcock doesn't like it. And because she doesn't like Daniel Smith, that means these two things are
00:21:16.560
connected. She genuinely could not pass a basic cognitive test. She does not have the logic to
00:21:25.280
pass a basic cognitive test for this. So if you don't think that the same people who are behind
00:21:31.120
the horrendous policies of MAGA in the US are not helping with what's going on with some of these
00:21:37.760
themes and some of these sovereignty independence actions in Alberta, then you're missing the plot.
00:21:43.840
And we have Canadian media that is owned by US MAGA hedge fund in your it's because she's she's going
00:21:52.480
on this whole thing because National Post is partially American owned. Okay, I'm sorry,
00:21:57.520
are there American commentators, the people who work for the National Post have always worked for the
00:22:02.240
National Post, or they've been familiar faces in Canadian media. What's she on about? Like again,
00:22:07.760
she's saying, you're you're not following the plot. Well, plots require fact patterns to make sense.
00:22:15.520
What's the fact pattern that would back up the idea that Danielle Smith is in league with MAGA? Again,
00:22:22.000
these people find breadcrumbs, and they just use them to basically create an entire conspiracy about how
00:22:27.280
the world's against their liberal version of Canada. Everyone's up to something. I guarantee you,
00:22:33.200
she probably thinks that I'm an American asset because I'm criticizing her points about Maple
00:22:38.400
MAGA. Because I'm criticizing her, I must have been put up to this to stop her from spreading the truth,
00:22:44.560
the truth that she can't actually explain because she doesn't know what she's talking about,
00:22:48.240
and she doesn't actually have any evidence to show. If she ever got evidence in her claws,
00:22:54.800
she would show it. She doesn't have any, so she just rants. But whatever. Anyways, that should be it
00:23:01.840
for this video, guys. No doubt I'm going to be covering more media propaganda in the coming days
00:23:07.360
here. There's a few videos that I actually need to get out in the next couple days because we got hit
00:23:11.680
really hard with news over the past 24, 48 hours, especially in British Columbia. There's this insane
00:23:17.760
case of a former Chilliwack school board trustee, Barry Neufeld, being fined $750,000 by the BC Human
00:23:26.320
Rights Tribunal for effectively not believing in gender theory. He doesn't believe in more than two
00:23:32.880
sexes. Ergo, he is now, you know, an evil bigot or whatever that needs to be fined. It doesn't even make
00:23:41.920
sense to explain it. Anyways, with that all being said, thank you guys for watching. Like, share,
00:23:47.120
subscribe. Consider hitting the join button and contributing monthly, and I'll see you all next time.