The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - The Media Is Furious At Poilievre's Success

00:00:00.000 hello everyone it'll take a while for people to filter in but this is kind of one of those

00:00:08.160 random live streams i'm just doing on the fly because i've never really done this before where

00:00:13.440 i just have a live stream out of nowhere for people to watch so right now i'm just experimenting

00:00:18.080 usually me and daniel do the live streams together but partially it's my fault because

00:00:22.800 my schedule is so chaotic and he actually has a much more reasonable schedule but then we can't

00:00:27.580 make them work together so i just wanted to do a quick live stream or like you know quick in my

00:00:32.880 mind is like 30 40 minutes just talking about some news of the day because while i can make videos i

00:00:38.840 don't want to keep repeating videos on the same subject but i still want to talk about the topic

00:00:43.020 longer so i think doing a live stream helps sort of you know move anyone who wants to hear more about

00:00:48.640 the topic into the sort of like i guess the the comment section that we can discuss more about

00:00:53.600 this stuff without people who don't really want to see you know wall-to-wall coverage from wyatt

00:00:58.160 about random media stuff uh like they don't want to see me in the in their subscription uh feed

00:01:04.180 constantly making a 12 minute video talking about media coverage of polyev but spoiler we're talking

00:01:09.920 about media coverage about pure polyev because uh it's one of those issues where yesterday i thought

00:01:15.720 because my video did quite well and a lot of people saw it i'm like okay well that's all i have to do

00:01:19.980 to talk about polyev in the media for the next while but the the coverage kept getting more

00:01:25.460 unhinged and the whining on twitter kept getting more brilliant to look at so now i really want to

00:01:31.100 just talk more about all this sort of follow that's happening about polyev being correct about something

00:01:36.860 which is fundamentally what happened so everyone here probably like obviously remembers all of the

00:01:43.660 stuff that happened with pure polyev and that car crash that happened at rainbow bridge and the media

00:01:48.800 freaking out at him oh you got something wrong even though it was them who got it wrong but what i

00:01:54.060 find so insane is just how pissed off people are how ticked off regular people are at pure polyev

00:02:01.480 thinking that this is the moment they're going to take him down they have such little left to go

00:02:05.820 after polyev with they're down to just being like he could have been a little bit nicer to that female

00:02:10.300 journalist could he have i don't even think he could have he was pretty straight up he said that

00:02:15.660 her like can to press like they do get tons of things wrong and that's bullying to point out that

00:02:20.700 she's bad at her job and that they're bad at her job and her question was ridiculous uh but i'll still

00:02:25.660 just wait a little bit here just because you know people are filtering in there's about 16 people

00:02:29.860 watching at the moment from the different feeds that i'm on uh so i'll just wait for more people

00:02:34.820 to sort of show up at the same time people can throw in comments and i'll just talk about stuff

00:02:38.580 as i go on i don't want to have all the rambling at the start of the video where there's maybe like

00:02:43.560 only 10 of the total viewers watching and then you know 10 minutes later a bunch of people are on and

00:02:49.280 they didn't realize that i had already passed by a bunch of the points they wanted me to touch on

00:02:53.540 way earlier on in the stream uh i think i'm even doing this on twitter so you i know it's all called

00:02:59.520 x i hate calling the platform x it sounds like a grammatical error whenever you say it um but

00:03:07.400 regardless um so what i wanted to do is just sort of go over these few tweets that i've been seeing

00:03:14.780 on twitter in regards to what polyev has been talking about i just want to make sure i grab

00:03:19.560 up the right one so for anyone who's already here i just want to highlight this one because this is

00:03:23.400 really really in a lot of ways uh highlights exactly the way a lot of people talk about polyev in

00:03:29.500 regards to this so and it's funny is i love how all these uh very liberal people and these nbp years

00:03:35.680 and whatnot are forced to rely on rebel news for their coverage of this event but whatever uh this

00:03:41.640 sean guy says pure polyev is a raging misogynist he has a definite penchant for bullying female

00:03:47.920 reporters and verbally assaulting them and obviously i'm just searching with pure polyev's name and with

00:03:52.820 bullying to see what i can find but like what does he mean by verbally assaulting women this is how

00:03:58.280 just not like standardlessness like this amount of standards that the left does not have is palpable

00:04:04.880 that he a female reporter you should you can go and watch the clip from rebel news it's really not

00:04:10.500 all that interesting not like a not in a bad way to rebel news it's just that the journalists came up

00:04:15.240 accused poly of a being somehow you know irresponsible by mentioning the media reports that the crash at the

00:04:22.580 rainbow bridge that resulted in a massive fireball like i think we all know if you were on social media at

00:04:27.200 time everyone thought it looked like a terrorist attack especially with all this hamas type stuff

00:04:31.640 going on in north america all the people going to pro hamas rallies it didn't feel like too far out of

00:04:37.300 bounds that this could be a terrorist attack but this lady from canada press is going after polyev

00:04:41.800 and accusing him of being irresponsible and i have all these journalists out there who are like oh

00:04:46.880 polyev is being like bullying and he like he's so like i don't know childish because he's calling her

00:04:52.600 out and canada press you won't let the like wrong reporting go he was calling her out for bad

00:04:58.000 reporting canada press had done to him last month or so and she and of course he's going to be a little

00:05:03.680 bit ticked off because she's here with another smear question implying that somehow he's like you make

00:05:09.920 creating a dangerous atmosphere in canada because you shouldn't go around polyev making all these

00:05:14.380 accusations about uh like i don't know like terror attacks happening at the border when the canada press

00:05:19.880 ctv news we're the ones who reported on it polyev is like the only politician in canada like i assume

00:05:25.760 it happened to any other conservative if they were the leader but right now polyev is the only

00:05:29.500 politician in canada who is prospectively like by the media standards must be able to control the

00:05:33.920 weather if he says something about the weather like it doesn't matter if he read a meteorod

00:05:38.140 meteorological report and he knew it was going to rain that day because he read the news if he says

00:05:42.580 it's going to rain and it rains the media members must think he's a god because it rained and polyev said so

00:05:47.820 when he's just reading their own content it's insane yeah uh does thunder bay ed have a job i don't

00:05:55.460 know what that means i'll you'll have to you'll have to make uh you'll have to sort of detail that

00:06:01.120 one out for me uh verinder uh but but yeah like i want to pull up some other tweets that they had

00:06:06.200 that i saw going on but they're just all so just like whiny like this one from paul champ the like

00:06:12.580 supposed alleged lawyer from ottawa he said good article by stephen mayor about polyev mayor says

00:06:18.760 the opposition leader's recent exchange with reporter was ungentlemanly caddish i might have

00:06:23.720 said a holish cpc has to understand great polls aren't because of pure polyev but to be despite of

00:06:30.840 him why so why weren't the polls that good before he was the leader generic conservative when candace

00:06:37.440 bergen was still the leader because people assume the interim leaders have generic people don't really

00:06:41.380 care who the interim leaders are which is why candace bergen and ronna ambrose have very good

00:06:46.200 reputations it's nothing against them it's just generally speaking canadians don't really look

00:06:50.680 too much into who the interim leader is so they kind of treat it like generic conservative so during the

00:06:56.500 polling with when the leadership election was on in 2022 the conservatives were ahead of the liberals

00:07:02.420 slightly it wasn't that great the liberals on paper would have probably still won more seats

00:07:07.020 and so how is the conservative polling really great in spite of pure polyev it went up after he was

00:07:14.160 leader like i think what happened he became leader and it dipped ever so slightly for like maybe a week

00:07:19.660 and you have the chantal hubert's of the world and all these people from the toronto star and the cbc

00:07:25.840 and canada press writing these reports or like like opinion articles in some cases obviously on the on the part of

00:07:32.500 chantal hubert but all these reports that are coming out that are supposedly objective talking

00:07:36.700 about how oh no polyev is in trouble he's not very popular he's been leader for a month guys you can't

00:07:41.840 nobody can be a popular leader in one month in canada or the the name recognition of our politicians

00:07:47.160 in canada is so dramatically low it means that it takes a while for canadians to get used to the

00:07:53.560 opposition leader to decide what they feel about him oftentimes people don't even know who the

00:07:57.620 opposition leader is come election day and that's the scary thing i guarantee 50 of people who voted

00:08:03.120 in the 2021 election could have not named all of the federal party leaders and i'm like and like like

00:08:09.200 an email paul gives one francois blanchet justin trudeau jagme saying erin o'toole i guarantee they

00:08:15.720 probably couldn't name at least two out of five of them and even even quebecers i guarantee probably

00:08:21.360 didn't know two out of five of them even with the use front i'm sorry french names tripped me up so

00:08:27.640 hard with blanchet that's probably a gimme to the quebecers because they are used to him but man they

00:08:32.580 i guarantee they didn't know who the name paul was and they probably didn't know who erin o'toole was

00:08:36.660 and this is the whole media idea the great thing about this live stream is i can ramble way more than

00:08:42.000 i'm used to uh i have to like restart my videos so often because i just start going down rabbit holes and

00:08:46.720 it's like 20 minutes later i'm like nobody's gonna watch this i make like random references

00:08:50.860 to things that people don't understand not because it's like oh i'm so smart i made a

00:08:54.180 an obscure reference it's like no i made a dumb obscure reference that nobody would understand

00:08:58.940 because nobody should know that information but the thing that the media the lie that people in

00:09:04.320 the media keep selling and this is my thing about andrew coin so many of the conservatives in the media

00:09:09.480 or at least the outlets that are supposedly more conservative i find that they tend to be almost

00:09:14.580 front groups for the liberal agenda where you get a lot of reporters from even korea

00:09:19.960 even the national post even all these other other publications are supposed to be conservative

00:09:24.920 they always push the line that as soon as a conservative party leader becomes the leader okay

00:09:29.300 now he has to tone it down and become prime ministerial in a system like canada where nobody

00:09:35.040 knows who you are the opposition leader the dumbest possible thing you can do is shut up after

00:09:39.100 you become the leader and just start being very poised and like patrician and very nice

00:09:45.460 nobody's going to know who you are i guarantee 50 of people couldn't name andrew sheer or erin o'toole

00:09:51.420 during the last elections it's because they didn't their their teams basically said pretend like you're

00:09:56.680 already the prime minister and you have nothing to prove but when you're the opposition leader you

00:10:00.300 have tons of stuff to prove you should be out there every single day proving yourself and that's

00:10:04.440 why polyev became super popular after he became the leader he didn't say okay i've done all my very

00:10:10.420 sparkly rhetoric during the leadership campaign now to pump the brakes you know just you know put even

00:10:16.340 on put on even thicker glasses and act like i'm already in the pmo that is the dumbest possible

00:10:21.720 thing you could do with polyev actually going after the media beating them in their own game

00:10:26.680 continuing to be as aggressive as he always was in parliament as the leader that's what's made

00:10:31.600 canadian say yeah i could picture that guy being the prime minister of canada i i see people assume a

00:10:37.440 guy they see everywhere and they know the name of already a lot of people automatically think well

00:10:41.600 yeah that guy could be prime minister i know who he is and on top of that after two conservative

00:10:46.380 leaders who really didn't prove to a lot of canadians that they disliked like justin trudeau

00:10:50.940 the way most canadians did polyev had to do a lot of legwork to prove that he understands what's wrong

00:10:57.300 with the liberal government because we had two leaders previously erin o'toole and andrew sheer less of

00:11:02.260 andrew sheer's fault i think he just had bad advice but more on and erin o'toole they didn't prove that

00:11:07.240 they even understood why canadians didn't like the current liberal government and elections are

00:11:11.580 almost always about turnout elections pretty much always come down to turnout because the same people

00:11:16.920 who are going to vote in the 2021 election are pretty much the same sort of people who are going

00:11:21.380 to vote in the next election you're usually not you know britain you're usually not bringing out a new

00:11:27.260 sort of faction of voters who didn't vote in the last election most of the time what you're doing

00:11:31.720 is just making your faction of voters come out even harder uh so i'd say like there's probably

00:11:37.260 about 80 percent of people in the country who will ever vote there's probably 20 percent of people you

00:11:41.320 could never convince to vote in their entire lives so inside that 80 percent about 80 percent of the 80

00:11:48.000 percent is probably going to vote and you're trying to make sure that more of the conservatives in that

00:11:52.800 group show up than liberals and when you have leaders like erin o'toole who think that if they kind

00:11:59.280 have cobbled together a platform that has some liberal ideas some green ideas some conservative

00:12:02.980 ideas some ndp ideas no one's going to show up because that satisfies nobody nobody knows what

00:12:07.540 he's doing but yeah whatever i'm gonna i'm gonna try to read more of these comments just so i don't

00:12:12.580 feel like i'm ignoring people here uh yeah that's a good one from timber uh typical woke idiots they

00:12:19.360 think everyone is a victim of someone that's not bullying it's it's talking like an adult 100 percent

00:12:24.400 it's like they thought that polyev polyev was supposed to let her lie that was i guess the

00:12:31.140 media's definition of not bullying her being kind is just pretending like she wasn't lying and again

00:12:36.460 maybe she didn't know that the ctv had put out the report at the same time if she failed to do that

00:12:41.620 that's kind of on her it's not polyev's like it's not polyev's job to just kind of let the media get

00:12:47.940 away with getting things wrong like i i made a satirical video yesterday but it's 100 percent right

00:12:53.720 that they're blaming polyev for all the mistakes of the media the media who thinks they're the most

00:12:58.480 credible entity in canada they're so reasonable and you should be watching 24 7 because they never

00:13:03.740 get a thing wrong but if they get something wrong and you cite them that's your fault because you

00:13:07.340 should have known that the super credible media was not credible at all but and they're saying like

00:13:12.040 well he shouldn't have showed up in parliament and quoted media what's he supposed to do wait two

00:13:17.640 weeks until they fully confirmed what happened it's kind of a politician's job to comment on things as

00:13:23.240 they happen if not you're going to blame them for not saying something at the time you'll be like

00:13:27.820 well why was he so slow on not on saying something like i'm not the biggest fan of joe biden but people

00:13:34.160 literally criticized him while the fires were going on in hawaii for not saying something right away

00:13:39.620 and they they should they should criticize him but that's just how it works if you if you are flat

00:13:45.260 footed as a politician people are gonna be like this guy's not dynamic enough for the job

00:13:48.680 and so polyev was acting dynamic and then as new information came up he dynamically uh you

00:13:54.320 dynamically pivoted not in a dishonest way he just said okay it's not a terrorist attack that's good

00:13:58.640 to know and then the media is like well why weren't you omniscient and you got it right the first time

00:14:02.860 like like i said early in their stream so there's a lot more people here and they probably didn't hear

00:14:06.460 but like if polyev says it's going to rain in a day because he read a media report the media must think

00:14:11.440 he caused the rain to happen because they don't seem to think that they don't seem to realize that

00:14:15.840 polyev reads media reports they just think he must just say things so that if polyev says it's

00:14:20.560 going to rain and it rains oh how did he know that it was going to rain well maybe he watched the

00:14:24.860 weather channel like everyone else did it's it's so stupid but uh i want to bring up another one of

00:14:30.720 these things i read the paul champ one earlier on and i want to get to that stephen mayer article that

00:14:35.500 he cited it's just it's palpably stupid this one part of it like the whole thing's bad there's just

00:14:41.080 this one part that's extremely hip not hypocritical basically like flat like you know smooth brained is

00:14:48.800 the best way of putting it oh so there's this other guy who's also superman of polyev he says i'm i'm

00:14:54.100 feeling better about candida now that polyev has been exposed and he's being called out for it

00:14:58.380 exposed how like i know i'm about to get the thing that he thinks he got exposed during but like if

00:15:03.660 polyev got exposed for something and it was major dude there would be wall-to-wall coverage there'd be

00:15:10.560 hashtags it didn't happen the liberals just keep trying to like you know conjure a scandal or conjure

00:15:17.980 a character flaw in polyev into the public and it's not working whatsoever they think if they

00:15:23.160 keep saying oh he's bullying people eventually in the polling in two months if they keep saying it

00:15:28.300 they keep saying he's bullying people that eventually they'll convince some canadians in a

00:15:32.220 poll to say that they associate the word bullying with him but other than just repeating a word i don't

00:15:37.040 think anyone's actually going to think that he's a bully the problem is that liberals only know how

00:15:41.740 to talk to their own side they've been so divisive over the past eight years they don't understand how

00:15:46.580 the average canadian thinks anymore they think that every single canadian thinks like an orange liberal

00:15:51.840 when i say orange liberal i mean a more nvp-ish liberal that's kind of justin trudeau's base

00:15:56.300 in my opinion that they think everyone thinks in a orange liberal hyper-progressive manner

00:16:01.080 that if you've committed crimes against the woke narrative that must mean you're a bigot that's why

00:16:06.880 press progress read an article on me and thought that i'm highly bigoted because i think that parental

00:16:12.460 rights passing parental rights protections are not going to result in any extra children being abused

00:16:18.320 that's ridiculous anyone abusing their kid was already doing it before parental rights protections

00:16:22.780 and those people did not care about the parental rights issue but whatever press progress saw that

00:16:28.100 i violated i may committed a crime against their left-wing narrative that parental rights are very

00:16:32.720 dangerous and schools should have more you know i should have way more rights over what children see

00:16:38.000 and do that that means that i've done something horrible but it's getting back to the tweet i'll

00:16:42.860 read from the start just for the momentum of it uh i'm feeling better about canada now that polio has

00:16:47.820 been exposed and he's being called out for it the leader of the official opposition cried wolf to get

00:16:52.780 attention and score points he then lied about where he got the information and tried to drag the media

00:16:57.960 while bullying a reporter it's ironic that he supposedly quotes the media when it's convenient

00:17:02.340 but blames them for his own mistakes like what what are you talking about that he he has it like

00:17:07.800 completely backwards it's actually he actually flip-flops like twice here he said he then lied about

00:17:13.340 where he got the information and dragged the media he didn't lie about the information like this guy

00:17:19.560 himself what is his name wilbur sorry the the the viewer count hides that turner this guy says he lied

00:17:26.880 about where he got the information but then later on in the next sentence he says it's ironic that

00:17:31.440 he supposedly quoted the media when it's convenient but blames them for his own mistakes but he did get

00:17:35.980 it from the media how is it his mistake if he got it from the media it's like if polio got it right

00:17:41.580 well he's probably wrong for having emphasized the terrorism issue and he's probably being islamophobic

00:17:46.100 or something stupid like that whatever the narrative would be but now he's wrong for having quoted the

00:17:50.720 media so he's wrong for rejecting the media and not taking them seriously but when he takes them

00:17:55.580 seriously and the media gets it wrong well obviously polio's fault for having taken the media seriously

00:18:00.520 even though he's a very bad man for not taking the media seriously and bullying them i don't know how

00:18:05.160 this is bullying if anything these people saying is bullying for him to call out this media reporter

00:18:10.320 for getting her question completely backwards in the context of the situation that somehow he's at fault

00:18:15.900 for saying the rainbow bridge incident could have been a terrorist attack when they reported that it could

00:18:20.160 have been a terrorist attack is somehow his fault him correcting her it it's not sexist in any way

00:18:26.280 they're sexist for thinking that you can't correct a female reporter i know tons of female reporters in

00:18:31.460 independent media do you think that media would ever say that pure that justin trudeau was being sexist

00:18:37.400 to sheila gun reid at rebel news or drea humphrey at rebel news when he ignored them had their security

00:18:42.720 pushed them away or belittled them when they asked questions no because the media doesn't care about if

00:18:48.600 you're a female or male reporter when it comes to independent media they just don't like you if

00:18:51.860 you're from independent media you're only have the protections of having someone challenge you be

00:18:57.100 considered sexist if you work for the legacy media and even then i'm giving that lady the benefit of

00:19:02.020 the doubt i think she probably also thinks it's ridiculous that certain talking heads like stephen

00:19:06.080 mayor and this turner guy think that somehow polyam is being misogynist or whatever i think paul champs

00:19:11.160 said the misogynist thing but before i get some comments i just want to finish off this stupid tweet so

00:19:16.960 back to what turner was saying he said who will trust a leader who makes up his own facts over a

00:19:21.580 potential security issue i'm sorry when did he make up the facts he got them from a media report he

00:19:25.700 didn't even say this is factual information he said media is currently reporting this okay whatever

00:19:30.540 moving on to the next sentence uh or who will i'll start from the beginning i guess who will trust a

00:19:35.780 leader who makes up his own facts over a potential security issue lies about it and tries to cover it up

00:19:40.540 what will happen when there is a real emergency will people ever listen to him polyam doesn't care about

00:19:45.840 the facts he only cares about power his arrogance will be his undoing and just no it's not going to

00:19:51.300 be his undoing you guys can say it all day long that he's going to be super unpopular because he's

00:19:55.220 bullying people and because he doesn't like the media it's not going to happen because no canadians

00:19:59.780 don't like the media and canadians realize peers right and if this was an actual gotcha moment on

00:20:05.380 polyam like he had done something wrong you would see way more blowback on social media all you see

00:20:10.300 like yeah you see a lot of tweets attacking polyam but it's the same people who would have put out a tweet

00:20:15.520 attacking him anyways it would just have been on a different subject matter they've just concentrated

00:20:20.020 on this because they think they really got him because this attack works well for the ndp and

00:20:25.480 liberal types but they don't realize the sort of a political canadian who votes or the conservative

00:20:31.800 canadian who they're trying to drag back over to the liberal party doesn't care about this at all

00:20:36.760 they actually think he's on the right so i'll go to comments oh someone actually left a so sorry someone

00:20:42.640 left a super chat and i'm super happy that that happened also i have to mention there's this one

00:20:47.720 woman denise who watches the channel who is an absolute star because i'm not sure if you guys

00:20:52.480 know i have that give send go campaign for my legal funds when it comes to this ridiculous lawsuit with

00:20:58.200 this chinese billionaire you can assume the kind of details of it i put out the article several times

00:21:03.720 that was talking about the guy who's suing us because he's suing us because we referenced an article

00:21:08.700 that he never sued the globe and mail over it makes no sense but she's donated eight hundred

00:21:14.200 dollars to me so she is an absolute star and has saved me a lot from having to pay interest on debt

00:21:19.780 like that she's a hundred percent saved me and now this other person who's now donated

00:21:24.620 pitski is also saving me uh your analysis always excellent good luck with your run as mp i'm in rocky

00:21:30.280 rich so i can't help much good luck sir uh well you're very close by so if you ever want to come

00:21:34.840 door knocking you can but i will mention to everyone and i even have a piece of lit right

00:21:38.600 here i am running for the uh calgary signal hill conservative party nomination my paperwork's almost

00:21:43.960 in to be on the ballot in the area so if you live in that area buy a conservative membership buy them

00:21:48.820 for your family and you can indeed vote for me um but i will move on from there and definitely thank

00:21:54.920 you for the 40 super chat uh and yeah so louise says libs will do anything they can to plant fear

00:22:03.080 uh including their media and yeah well yeah like the liberals and the liberal media there's almost

00:22:07.900 no separation at this point the i don't the fear thing also just doesn't work that's the one great

00:22:14.060 the one great thing that came out of covid is i think a lot of fear journalism no longer works on

00:22:18.620 people was there risks around covid off 100 obviously just like there's a risk around any sort of flu or

00:22:25.420 cold or anything like that i think yeah it's probably worse than a real flu but it was so overblown and

00:22:30.920 for so long a lot of people when they say be afraid of polyev nobody cares anymore and remember

00:22:36.380 one of those tweets i just read from an unhinged leftist they talked about the polyev crying wolf

00:22:41.600 sort of a thing that's what the media is doing that's what they keep doing they keep crying wolf

00:22:46.460 about polyev being a bully and they're crying wolf during covid constantly and they're crying wolf that

00:22:51.820 polyev has far right connections and he's dog whistling and it's like nobody cares anymore just it just

00:22:57.980 doesn't affect people people just don't give a crap uh why it is based i agree with vc i endorse that

00:23:04.200 comment um dr don levin said something and i agree with it but i won't show it on his screen uh and

00:23:15.960 oh yeah 100 timber's right like uh yet wilbur turner this guy i'll just bring up the tweet quickly

00:23:25.760 uh just so everyone who just started watching this guy who's going after polyev uh timber is referring

00:23:30.820 to yet wilbur probably supports invoking the emergencies act for a non-emergency protest what

00:23:35.220 a hypocrite and i'm going to get to that in the uh in one of the articles where they're trying to

00:23:40.440 pretend like because the toronto star there there's a lot of truth behind people who call the toronto star

00:23:46.020 the the toronto red star it is such a far left paper that they can't even agree on the fact that the

00:23:53.580 truckers were protesting for freedom you can disagree with certain protest tactics certain

00:23:58.080 things certain people said 100 but he he can't understand that these people's motivation was

00:24:04.040 freedom he's like no they're here for fascism and anarchy they always do that kind of weird uh

00:24:09.480 dual kind of uh label where they'll always call people contradictory things you're a anarcho-fascist

00:24:16.260 or something like that or these libertarian dictators are like whatever they always do this weird

00:24:20.640 thing where they pretend that people who are protesting for freedom are secretly like nazis or

00:24:24.660 something which makes no sense you can disagree with some freedom protesters some people can be like

00:24:29.300 a little bit hyper anti-government but like they're definitely not the type of people who are going to

00:24:34.020 start you know having show trials to like lock up their enemies in prison they'd be the type of

00:24:39.180 people who would almost be anti-prison in general um but uh and i'll bring up another tweet here i think

00:24:45.860 i have a few more and here's just here's just a great example of of just something that trudeau is

00:24:51.080 doing these days it's just not going to work because he's trying to backpedal now a little bit

00:24:54.780 on this whole heater oil uh carbon tax thing so paul so justin trudeau is now trying to like work

00:25:00.960 towards trying to stop the maritimes from using heater oil and move people over to electric heat

00:25:06.380 pumps so which this is basically him trying to backpedal as hard as humanly possible

00:25:11.580 on his like his freeze on heater oil for the carbon tax because he's basically admitting that

00:25:17.680 okay i've really messed up on pausing this carbon tax on heater oil because i've now admitted that the

00:25:25.020 carbon tax is no longer universal and it was hurting people so he's going to try and force people off

00:25:29.480 heater oil to force them back onto paying the carbon tax so that canadians don't like or provincial

00:25:36.020 governments like saskatchewan don't make the logical argument that why should we have to pay the carbon

00:25:40.720 tax if nobody else technically has to pay it depending on what kind of emissions that they're

00:25:45.900 putting out it's ridiculous um and i'm sorry if i'm struggling here it's not because i'm running

00:25:52.260 out of stuff i just don't want to jump over to the article right away what's this thing

00:25:55.560 oh uh here's another here's another great tweet uh bev ray rayburn obviously don't follow any of

00:26:01.700 these people on twitter i want you guys to all protect your brains but uh this bev raymond says

00:26:06.740 polyvis misogyny is showing love is bullying at the female reporters uh i don't again i don't know

00:26:13.340 how this lady assumes that she's not being sexist by assuming that a female reporter should never be

00:26:18.620 held accountable for saying something that's incorrect because like getting something wrong

00:26:22.720 as a reporter is so much worse than just getting something wrong as some random crank on twitter

00:26:27.060 if you're a reporter asking a question to a politician implying they did something wrong and the facts of

00:26:33.200 the case that you're that you're talking about are completely backwards you could cost someone

00:26:38.080 quite a few votes by getting something wrong as a reporter it's obviously in the politician's best

00:26:44.240 interest to take someone to task who's lying or who gets something blatantly wrong like this whole

00:26:49.320 rainbow bridge uh like explosion poly is not wrong for saying that it could have been a terror attack

00:26:55.660 when the media was saying that it could have been a terror attack he's not so they they hold him

00:27:00.580 and all conservatives to the idea that they have to be omniscient justin trudeau doesn't have he can

00:27:07.680 pretend he doesn't know that his family members were taking money from the we charity to do speeches

00:27:12.120 hundreds of thousands of dollars he can remain completely ignorant about that he can remain

00:27:16.500 ignorant about all the details of the snc lavlin scandal he can pretend he didn't know that the

00:27:21.140 adj con was paying for all of his accommodations on his island he can do all that but poly up doesn't know

00:27:26.900 that an explosion was a terror attack minute one that's a flaw on poly's part because oh goodness

00:27:33.100 how is this conservative not an actual superhero um

00:27:36.500 uh no i like this i like this kind of people aren't going to care about this when they go to

00:27:44.960 the grocery store doesn't let the media drive the story and this does connect to another uh toronto star

00:27:50.140 article i want to talk about because they're acting as if poly of rising the polls is not because poly of

00:27:56.800 is correctly diagnosing that the problem in the country is both trudeau's fault as well as like

00:28:02.700 the printing of money and jegi so they're saying that basically poly of is popular because the media is

00:28:09.060 not criticizing him enough this is the kind of reporting you get out of the toronto star that people

00:28:14.600 think that somehow is the media's fault for not having attacked poly of enough that somehow if he

00:28:21.820 needs to be exposed for being some sort of like secret fascist when you're 100 correct charles when

00:28:27.740 people go to the grocery store they don't care oh that all this rabbit-holing political nonsense oh

00:28:32.660 poly of shook hands with jeremy mckenzie well shock gasp who gives a crap i think it's jeremy mckenzie

00:28:39.420 having personally interacted with him is a scumbag at the same time poly of supposed to people

00:28:44.560 canadians are supposed to care that jeremy showed up and shook hands with poly of at an event these

00:28:50.160 journalists assume people think about toxic politics the way they do and that they know all the obscure

00:28:55.340 characters uh that canadians know all the weird obscure political characters that they do it's like

00:29:00.740 whenever the article comes out because someone was at an event with paul from paul from is like a famous

00:29:06.340 white supremacist in canada he's one of two white supremacists in canada he's a complete loser i was

00:29:12.440 at the protest in toronto with daniel boardman i told him to screw off from the protest because he's

00:29:17.100 a complete idiot he shows up with his uh old canadian flag and just hangs out of protest says nothing

00:29:23.160 usually i would even say he's usually pretty polite because he doesn't want to get called out

00:29:27.400 because if a media member takes a photo of him at the event they could say well obviously these people

00:29:32.600 at this event are cool with paul from being there when the vast majority of people outside of myself

00:29:37.240 and a couple others don't know who paul from looks like but the media thinks that everyone should know

00:29:41.680 what he looks like so if he shows up to an event and shakes hands with an obscure conservative mp

00:29:46.760 or he donates to someone like he did derrick sloan back in the day that everyone should have known that

00:29:52.320 this happened and everyone should have known who paul from was and if you didn't you should be like you

00:29:56.900 know like drawn and quartered it's ridiculous how they act around stuff like this but again

00:30:01.940 if you're justin trudeau and you take pictures next to like convicted pedophiles which i don't

00:30:07.940 blame him for they're just random idiots who come and take a photo of them that he's not responsible

00:30:12.200 for that but pure poly of is a dangerous human being because jeremy mckenzie showed up at his event

00:30:17.760 and shook hands with them assuming that pure even knew who he was it's it's completely ridiculous but

00:30:23.640 maybe this is a good jumping off point to get back to we're not back to but let's start reading this

00:30:29.460 article because there's this one section this middle of this ipolitics article by stephen mayor

00:30:34.040 that i find just atrociously stupid uh it's starting halfway through the article not that i'm trying to

00:30:40.160 like avoid stuff but he does a lot of sort of poisoning the well and drive-by media shootings on

00:30:45.300 poly of earlier on the article but i just want to get to sort of substance because this is what he

00:30:49.180 actually wrote the article in response to so quoting stephen mayor he said in question period

00:30:54.120 of poly of unwisely referred to a media report of a terrorist attack or to media reports of a

00:30:59.520 terrorist attack when the truth came out the liberals accused him of jumping the gun by asking

00:31:03.280 him about terrorism a legitimate but not very damaging critique a canadian repress reporter a

00:31:09.200 young woman who normally covers court uh court naturally enough asked him about what uh this at his

00:31:14.800 next news conference which was in toronto he lit into her first complaining peevishly about some

00:31:20.520 errors and a complicated story about canadian indian relations that went sideways on the canadian

00:31:25.760 press last month he treated her with contempt and quoting poly of you may have yet another falsehood

00:31:31.520 in your you have yet sorry people i'm so bad at reading right now on the fly so uh poly of said

00:31:38.120 you have made yet another falsehood in your question where are were you where are oh my goodness

00:31:44.700 this is actually insane uh that i can't read right now where you are wrong is the ctv reporter that

00:31:51.080 the government of canada was presuming the incident was a terrorist that's what i said in my remarks

00:31:56.980 and then stephen mayor kind of goes on to basically blame poly of for the ctv report itself so stephen

00:32:04.360 mayor says and the ctv report that after poly of spoke and the ctv report was after poly spoke in the

00:32:10.560 house he likely got his news from fox raised groundless fears over a distant car accident and

00:32:15.660 was asked about it treating a young journalist like a malicious idiot former leader andrew sheer who

00:32:21.000 would be prime minister now if he had been better able to answer journalists questions about his dual

00:32:25.260 citizenship and his long ago work in the saskatchewan insurance industry tweeted a clip of the brow

00:32:30.460 beating uh triumphantly when biased journalists tried doing the liberals dirty work they should at least

00:32:36.360 get their facts straight if they can't do that they could at least bring up some out bring some apples

00:32:40.520 with them and like i don't know what stephen mayor's problem even is here sorry about the reading there

00:32:46.600 guys that was horrible you should unsubscribe to me just from that terrible reading of mine but i don't

00:32:52.500 even get what stephen mayor is getting at here it's like okay well maybe poly have got it from fox

00:32:58.440 before he got it from the ctv news although if you if you're in politics or the media long enough

00:33:03.600 you know about a public an article coming out from a publication long before it actually comes out

00:33:09.800 because ctv news reporters and other individuals who write news for the different wire services and

00:33:15.320 whatnot usually tweet out what they know on x i guess post what they know on x because you're not

00:33:21.200 supposed to say tweet on x whatever i don't care but people usually are saying this stuff on twitter

00:33:26.480 before the article comes out and even if he got from fox who cares is is fox bad now are you not

00:33:33.000 allowed to are you not allowed to quote one of the most viewed news organizations in north america

00:33:38.520 anymore i guess not but this is what stephen mandel's like thing is now or stephen mayor's thing is is

00:33:44.620 that somehow like poly of is bad because he even questions what journalists do um

00:33:50.260 okay here's the bullying part this is the thing i really wanted to read from this article

00:33:56.040 uh so he says uh it makes me think of the 10 year old reporting he uh reporting he mentioned

00:34:02.460 to proudfoot back then i was writing a boring in-depth story and calm about his election bill

00:34:07.180 i repeatedly asked him for interviews and he always declined and he still was thinking about it decades

00:34:11.500 later because poly of doesn't like stephen mayor and he brought up how poly of uh how stephen had

00:34:16.780 basically written a story that ended up getting a bunch of death threats sent to poly of's uh office

00:34:21.560 and that obviously he probably doesn't think that stephen mayor is accountable for that but

00:34:26.020 basically stephen is still trying to say that every single bad actor in canada who's slightly to the

00:34:32.400 sent us right of center is poly of's fault yeah stephen won't take accountability based on his own

00:34:38.100 rules that reporting he did that was inaccurate that got poly of in hot water and was he was sent

00:34:43.480 death threats over that's not stephen mayor's fault but anything that a conservative does in canada

00:34:47.820 is obviously from pure poly of anyways moving on but the then stephen mayor says this is how bullies

00:34:54.240 act they avoid interacting with people who might be an equal match and seek a little uh to belittle

00:34:59.000 those who they can dominate he's acting like this this this like uh can press journalist who showed up

00:35:06.800 was supposed to be like what like just like pure poly of sought her out ran down the street looking

00:35:12.200 for a woman to just browbeat or something like that she asked him a question and people and this

00:35:17.840 guy's at stephen mayor is acting like poly of should have seen that like oh she's a woman well i'm

00:35:22.620 obviously not going to question her credibility or the the facts of the question she's asking me

00:35:28.440 because it's a woman it would be bullying because she is somehow less powerful than me let's be clear

00:35:34.140 here if you're a canadian politician a leader of party you're more powerful than 99.9 percent of people

00:35:40.500 in this country so by this logic pushing back on any journalist is bullying and let and that is

00:35:46.740 basically their perspective that is the perspective of chantal hubert when she was speaking on the cvc and

00:35:51.540 i want to play that clip again because of how atrocious it is but i don't know what what like what

00:35:56.320 standards they're trying to they're trying to like enforce here that paul and here here's really the

00:36:01.800 thing i'm falling all over myself a bit because i'm trying to circling to my point i should just get

00:36:06.500 right to it the standards of the media is that they want poly of to lose that poly of they they're

00:36:12.660 so confused that unlike erin o'toole who would lay down and put his neck on a train track as a speeding

00:36:17.660 train comes towards them they're wondering why poly of won't just basically lay down and die for them

00:36:24.420 and just give them the win they're deeply upset that when a reporter asks him a question that's

00:36:29.560 completely fully fictitious the the what it's based on is the idea that somehow poly of was the

00:36:35.420 one who said that the the crash down at the rainbow bridge was a terror attack that that was somehow

00:36:40.960 his fault they're they're basically wondering why and they're exasperated the fact that he won't just

00:36:46.080 say oh i'm sorry about that even though he has nothing to say sorry over but the media has gotten so

00:36:50.900 used to conservatives just taking it that they're wondering why he won't just take it and they they've

00:36:56.620 been so sheltered without conservatives who push back that they think it's now bullying but i i know

00:37:02.740 i guarantee i know i missed a bunch of these uh questions so i'm going back a little bit um

00:37:07.060 uh 100 uh like what tim says pierce scares the hell the snowflakes that make up 90 of our so-called

00:37:14.700 journalists and what you'd understand and i i wanted to make a video about this but it's almost so

00:37:19.380 such an obscure sort of thing to talk about it doesn't matter if you understand how the cbc and ctv news

00:37:25.260 and all these other subsidized media let's put out their news it's like what they do it's not like

00:37:31.700 you would imagine a big newsroom people sitting in their cubicles writing up reports running around

00:37:36.320 passing each other paper oh i have something that just came out of manitoba oh there's a fire in this

00:37:40.800 town it's not that professional a lot of cbc's news is just random people who live in their small

00:37:47.240 town who do the reports and it's it's not that like hard hitting as you would think there's no such

00:37:53.580 thing as beat reporters anymore like there's that one lady who covers court that poly of uh was

00:37:59.360 questioning back that's maybe one of the few remaining reporters who that's their beat they

00:38:03.580 sit around courthouses all day and they report on happenings that go on most reporters are not

00:38:08.820 experts in anything they're people sitting at home wearing sweatpants typing up articles that they

00:38:13.940 were mandated to write and the the standards of how biased you can be in a news report are so insane

00:38:20.120 you can do whatever you want and get away with it like remember that article sorry i need a finally

00:38:24.400 need a sip of tea also i fully endorsed tazzo well sweet orange tea it's brilliant but the standard for

00:38:32.580 how biased you can be in an article to the left and have it still be considered neutral by the legacy

00:38:38.040 media is insane remember that report where they were saying that poly of was engaging in conspiratorial

00:38:44.340 um like conspiratorial like language or something like that by talk by talking about the wf and

00:38:50.480 condemning them that they were somehow like he was engaging in conspiratorial

00:38:54.800 like language or like he's playing to the conspiracy theorist crowd and that was that was considered an

00:39:02.180 objective news report because they laundered the opinion that could that pure poly of his conspiracy

00:39:08.360 that it's not even really opinion it's it's anti-factual it's a smear but it's considered news because

00:39:13.980 they laundered the opinion through two i think a professor and an activist who said it for the

00:39:19.240 reporter so obviously the reporter wants to say that poly of is a conspiracy theorist so they called

00:39:24.000 up two people who would basically say that and then that's what led to that pei question at that gas

00:39:29.620 station where that reporter it was kind of like the first really it's kind of the first famous clip

00:39:35.420 of poly of pushing back on a reporter he had done it before but that was the first viral one like

00:39:39.900 really really viral moment with poly of with a journalist that lady in pei asked him the question

00:39:45.300 saying aren't you dog whistling to the far right isn't it true that you're kind of trying to get

00:39:50.400 trump's crowd and all this and it was like it was complete nonsense question but they laundered it

00:39:55.760 through the supposedly objective report that quoted two heavily biased left-wing people but then and then

00:40:02.100 it like they because they did that and it was objective it became a mainstream opinion in the legacy

00:40:08.240 media where because two experts said it now any journalist can just say it like it's true which

00:40:13.600 led to that embarrassing scenario where that pei journal said wasn't it true that you're dog

00:40:17.900 whistling and poly of is like what do you mean by dog whistling what have i said and she couldn't answer

00:40:21.320 but it's because the way the media works incentivizes her to not do her research she just saw that

00:40:26.720 another report sort of said that he's a conspiracy theorist so now she's allowed to allege in questions

00:40:31.500 that you're a conspiracy theorist so what do you say about that it's it's it's a when did you stop

00:40:35.860 beating your wife question it's ridiculous uh sorry getting back to questions um yeah yeah carl's

00:40:42.460 right it's a weak cheap shot it's all about the economy it's a common sense yeah the the bullying

00:40:47.940 sort of attacks on poly of are not going to work people care about the grocery bills and their power

00:40:53.740 bills and their taxes far more than like the character flaws supposed character flaws of pure poly of

00:41:00.560 and these aren't even character flaws it's common sense that you're going to correct a journalist

00:41:04.700 who's lying uh yeah and this is another good one from demetrio is the left considers hysteria a valid

00:41:11.020 political point yeah like basically just being concerned about something you say this all the

00:41:15.560 time on social media that that pure poly makes me feel anxious and he makes me feel scared and i feel

00:41:21.740 unsafe because of pure poly of and you will actually have publications especially the super far left ones

00:41:27.200 like anti-hate.ca and press progress and toronto star use irrational left-wingers on social medias

00:41:34.100 anxiety just baseless anxiety around poly of as evidence that somehow he's divisive he's not you're

00:41:41.300 not divisive when you're getting 44 of the vote in some polls you're wildly popular actually and and

00:41:47.660 punching past 40 in canada is insanely difficult like we're in a presidential election down south not we are

00:41:54.900 but you know like the americans are heading towards a presidential election where there's like there's

00:41:59.640 usually only two serious candidates the republican and the democrat and even trump and biden are below

00:42:04.780 40 percent in canada with five parties that can actually win seats and you're pulling above 40 percent

00:42:12.080 that's pretty incredible uh robert thank thank you for saying this new sub you're doing god's work

00:42:19.140 reading toronto star so that i don't have to well i hope that i uh he's very busy but i hope daniel

00:42:24.700 boardman comes back and he starts making more of the uh worst of the cbc videos because none of us

00:42:30.200 want to watch the cbc and he was doing the lord's work as well watching the cbc so we don't have to

00:42:35.500 uh timber again i think the mainstream media is actually seeing the writing on the wall

00:42:40.300 sensing the government through uh through is uh the government trough assumed to be empty

00:42:46.060 so the high level so that at a high level is why they are blasting pure poly of heavily i also think

00:42:51.840 they're trying to set up a narrative about poly of they know they're losing they know this narrative is

00:42:56.680 not going to stop poly of from breeding trough they're just trying to set the groundwork so that

00:43:01.360 after repeating the bullying line he harasses people he's a bad person he's divisive that in maybe four

00:43:08.920 to six years after poly has been prime minister they can maybe get that stuff to stick with enough

00:43:14.920 cheap shot examples of him slightly being rude to someone not even just contentious with someone

00:43:20.380 that that's what they're trying to do they did the same thing to harper harper's untransparent

00:43:24.500 harper shady harper's insular harper had a certain style of doing things he did tend to like everything

00:43:30.400 filtered through himself it wasn't a lack of transparency thing he's obviously far more transparent

00:43:36.220 than mr sunshine justin trudeau but the media kept pushing this idea that harper's secretly corrupt

00:43:42.220 and does everything in dark smoke-filled rooms that it eventually stuck after like eight years of

00:43:47.460 him being prime minister but that's just how the media operates i think he was prime minister longer

00:43:52.220 than that oh i guess nine years 20 2006 to 2015 um yeah i i agree i've never felt more assured by a

00:44:01.560 politician than i am with poly of and i'm 67 and like that's kind of a tragic thing in canada i don't

00:44:06.760 think we've had that many really solid conservatives in canadian history like dieffen baker is probably

00:44:12.060 the last one you could say was like a wall-to-wall conservative on all the issues but we've always

00:44:17.240 had the issue of having people like brian mulroney who like i guess they're kind of a fiscal conservative

00:44:22.240 in the sense that they support free trade and more military spending but when you actually look at

00:44:26.400 their overall fiscal plans they're spending their taxes and whatnot they're not conservative he wasn't a

00:44:32.140 social conservative really in any way like you could say john crutch uh john crutchian yeah was

00:44:38.080 way more conservative than than uh brian mulroney he actually cut government spending by 25 or like 28

00:44:46.000 in the federal government that was fantastic obviously john crutchian was also a social progressive for

00:44:51.580 the 90s but like he was actually more conservative than the the pcs that's that's why reform and the

00:44:57.820 alliance were necessary because the conservative party had less become a party for conservatism and

00:45:04.020 just commerce i mean not even really like fiscal conservatism because they weren't really big on

00:45:09.140 low taxes it was just trade and commerce you know there was the brian mulroney style conservatives who

00:45:14.800 are the types of conservatives who are like it's conservative to use taxpayer money to subsidize

00:45:19.960 businesses because it's pro-business it's like it's not really pro-business you're just propping up dead

00:45:24.640 businesses that's why and this is you're gonna you're noticing how much i rabbit hole watching me

00:45:29.440 live but that's why the great depression back in the 30s went on so long fdr in the united states

00:45:34.980 started using taxpayers money over taxing people and then trying to pick winners and losers in different

00:45:40.420 industries and because the government's never going to be good at like allocating money it was allocated

00:45:45.660 to all the most inefficient places which dragged on the great depression for several more years

00:45:50.060 than uh then uh then it should have gone on for renee is right deep breaths young man get your thoughts

00:45:57.720 in order i will slow down a little bit but i'm also just a little bit sort of we're gonna do a

00:46:02.980 little practice here where i talk ever so slightly slower renee is right uh i do just talk really fast

00:46:09.520 because this is just to a certain extent how fast i talk in general also i think because daniel's not

00:46:15.240 here as a co-host i'm thinking i have to fill up space or just the air in the room with my voice but

00:46:20.840 that's probably not quite right i can probably sort of tone it down a little bit here uh and theron is

00:46:28.160 100 correct that's where i'm going to move on to the uh on to the uh this uh toronto star article

00:46:36.640 because this is what the toronto star article alleges that somehow poly of is getting too much

00:46:40.900 positive coverage and theron said also poly of gets no positive coverage from media

00:46:45.480 speaks for him and their credibility and this is where the toronto star and left-wing journalists

00:46:51.440 think that just simply mentioning the fact that poly is popular in the polls counts as pro poly of

00:46:57.680 coverage i don't see it as pro uh trudeau coverage whenever in the past they've said that he's up in

00:47:02.400 the polls it's a report you're just saying abacus data or nano has put out some numbers and it's good

00:47:07.820 for trudeau i don't think that's pro trudeau i've covered like i've covered polls in the past that

00:47:13.520 were good for trudeau and i wasn't doing pro trudeau work if anything i was doing conservative

00:47:18.400 work and pointing out that the conservatives aren't doing so hot under a tool and that a big change

00:47:23.380 needs to be made what is the media scared of i think that they're scared of what i think it was

00:47:29.600 timber someone else who pointed out a few comments ago the media is petrified of the fact that they're

00:47:36.020 probably going to get their subsidies pulled plus they're just ideologically in league with the

00:47:40.620 liberals in the ndp these days the funny thing is the media is probably more the members of the media

00:47:46.740 because they're very out of touch with the average person they actually probably if there was if they

00:47:50.660 could choose who won the election they'd probably choose the ndp or the greens there's a reason why

00:47:54.960 the greens are irrelevant for the most part they should get coverage just as the ppc should get

00:47:59.880 coverage too even though they don't have a seat uh but they the greens get like outsized coverage

00:48:05.580 for the fact that it's a party with two seats they get coverage all over the place i think it's three

00:48:10.060 seats now i don't even know but it's it's not substantial but if elizabeth maybe comes out with

00:48:15.180 any statement whatsoever there's going to be an article from every single outlet about it even

00:48:19.100 though most of her opinions don't really matter she's kind of a kooky person and they never really

00:48:23.400 cover her weird 9-11 conspiracy theory type stuff she puts out but and but they treat her like a

00:48:28.960 serious party as if she's as big as the conservatives and the liberals but if the the media members were to

00:48:34.660 vote an election i guarantee they'd probably vote green or ndp to become the next government they

00:48:40.220 still like the liberals they understand the liberals are the only realistic option they can sell to

00:48:45.000 canadians so while they puff up the greens and the ndp before ever the end of every election they still

00:48:52.080 steer towards endorsing the concert or the the liberals at the end of the day and when i say endorse i

00:48:57.940 mean in terms of their coverage obviously angling people to try and vote liberal every once in a while

00:49:03.260 you see those ridiculous media bias charts that leftists put out and they try and claim that most

00:49:08.060 of the publications in canada are somehow right-wing and they all endorse the conservative party

00:49:12.880 if you ever see this it's deeply dishonest what they'll do is they'll find an endorsement opinion

00:49:18.800 piece from a specific writer and they will consider that the endorsement of the entire publication

00:49:24.500 so at times they even claim that the toronto star and other left-wing publications like the globe and

00:49:30.320 like globe mail is not far left like the toronto stars they're more just kind of like center left

00:49:35.060 they'll claim that these outlets endorsed the conservatives when they did they didn't it's just

00:49:40.860 that the conservative opinion writers who happen to work at a couple of these publications because

00:49:44.420 conservative opinion writers tend to get a lot of views because a lot of people agree with their

00:49:49.360 what their opinions that because they get a lot of views on these opinion articles they put out

00:49:54.060 endorsing the conservatives ergo somehow that publication is pro-conservative

00:49:58.400 watch ctv news or cbc if you can survive it every time the conservative make says anything

00:50:04.860 uh what happens and the the example i just go to is lisa laflam even though thankfully she's no longer

00:50:10.060 working what they always do even if they are technically neutrally covering something the

00:50:15.160 conservatives say or do there's always that kind of eye-rolling sneering every time a conservative says

00:50:20.340 anything so that's even worse than the media just coming out right and trying to trash

00:50:25.220 the conservatives the way sort of leftists on social media do because it's subtle if they

00:50:31.720 were super overt being anti-conservative most people would assume there was something up and

00:50:37.120 that they are they're not going to believe the media every time they put out uh anti-conservative

00:50:41.380 propaganda because it doesn't work in the u.s msnbc cnn all these publications are hyper anti-republican

00:50:47.420 and by being so anti-republican if anything they just make the media like the public think that

00:50:52.140 they're they lack credibility just as democrats would say that fox news isn't very credible

00:50:57.340 because they're very overtly pro-republican and not very and do not like the democrats very much

00:51:03.160 the the canadian media is subtle enough that the average person who's not super politically savvy

00:51:08.880 assumes that this is a very neutral and unbiased coverage so when they see when there's these very

00:51:14.960 subtle anti-conservative narratives baked into stories the viewer at home doesn't detect that this

00:51:21.900 this this story is kind of like trying to go after the conservatives in a subtly uh like you know

00:51:27.360 dishonest way they just pick up on the fact that oh the conservatives seem to be up to something and

00:51:32.180 they think they figured it out for themselves that the conservatives are bad when the stories arc as

00:51:38.000 subtle as it is is obviously trying to lead people to thinking that the conservatives are bad

00:51:42.600 that's what makes the cbc and ctv so much worse than the toronto star and some of these more

00:51:48.220 overtly left-wing outlets is because most people just assume what's the cbc obviously it's just

00:51:54.520 it's public news it's unbiased news and people take the anti-conservative lessons away from the

00:52:00.620 coverage and then they think that then they but they think that they took that uh that narrative or

00:52:06.820 that lesson away themselves they didn't think that the media specifically pushed it on them and they

00:52:12.040 just didn't notice it um but maybe this is a great time to transition over to this uh to this

00:52:19.800 toronto star article because i found it quite atrocious um i think there's the titles of the

00:52:26.120 articles too are just ridiculous this one says media fails canadians by giving free pass to pure

00:52:30.500 poly of and what this man means by free pass bob hepburn is that the media doesn't trash poly of 24 7

00:52:37.960 so unless they trash poly of 24 7 somehow they're making poly of look good uh so like the the sub

00:52:44.780 headline is canadian media has failed to provide canadians with clear picture of what poly of's

00:52:49.520 government would look like and like what do you mean by clear picture you can only speculate about

00:52:54.620 what a poly of government would look like so this toronto star journalist bob here basically saying

00:53:00.260 well they haven't made up enough stuff about what poly of government would look like i've seen other

00:53:04.700 journalists from conservative sides get in trouble because hey how can you say that this would be

00:53:09.040 what the nbp would do and went in manitoba or alberta or wherever uh that's wrong how do you know that

00:53:14.480 you you're just speculating but this toronto star journalist is like why isn't the media speculating

00:53:19.020 harder about what poly of might do um i just want to sort of scroll down because he does a little bit

00:53:25.180 of flavor uh like flavor text stories doesn't really mean anything uh here's a great starting line

00:53:31.560 but what do you really know what poly of would do as prime minister beyond killing the federal carbon

00:53:36.420 tax do you know anything about how he would fix the housing crisis or tackle inflation health care

00:53:41.220 interest rates the environment or regional or regional alienation and like and i'll sort of jump

00:53:47.060 in and out i'm going to keep taking it off stage just so you don't have to look at the article sitting

00:53:51.000 there but like at like what do you mean he's literally spoken on every single one of these issues

00:53:57.080 inflation the housing crisis regional alienation these are all things that poly of has spoken on

00:54:03.380 a lot and actually the media tends to cover his press conferences about housing and stuff like that so

00:54:08.660 if you watch even the legacy media you would get a generally good idea about what poly of would want

00:54:13.320 to do on housing in terms of like deregulation lowering taxes trying to make sure that they incentivize

00:54:18.660 more like home construction trying to set targets for cities so that the cities will get out of their

00:54:24.980 own way and reduce local sort of zoning laws that prevent new homes from being put up he's actually

00:54:30.100 been pretty detailed about it but uh yeah it's ridiculous also i do have to call it maryland johnson

00:54:36.120 because maryland johnson is also a star and she came up door knocking with me a couple of days ago

00:54:41.220 uh in discovery in calgary signal hill again shameless plug if you live in calgary signal hill

00:54:47.480 um i'm running for the conservative party nomination out here hopefully me stumbling over my words

00:54:53.120 while i read things it's not giving you a horrifyingly negative impression of me but if you

00:54:56.820 happen to live in this riding in western calgary make sure to buy a conservative party membership

00:55:01.100 make sure your family has them and vote for me so we can actually have a good conservative

00:55:05.680 representing the riding and not just some red tory who doesn't actually talk about policy or doesn't

00:55:11.020 take conservative positions on pretty much anything i always get annoyed by the amount of people who run

00:55:15.640 for nominations who like you look at their background you're like what principles do you actually have

00:55:19.660 they're conservative and they're like i'm support small business i'm like that's great but that's

00:55:23.720 that's it what's the point of electing you and paying you an mp salary um anyway so we're going

00:55:29.140 back to that article there and stop i gotta really stop sidetracking but anyway so after that last

00:55:34.620 paragraph he says i bet not much part of the reason for that is failing the failure of the liberals and

00:55:40.060 the ndp to strongly take their case to voters on how and why poly of would be bad for the country

00:55:44.760 indeed the two parties have allowed poly of the conservatives to brand justin trudeau as the man

00:55:49.420 who can't do anything right and jagmeet singh as his feckless enabler but the biggest reason is that

00:55:54.180 the media has failed in its role of providing canes with a clear picture of what poly of a poly

00:55:58.960 of government would look like dude have has have these people seen the media coverage we've just

00:56:03.900 gotten over a week where they can't stop saying the word bully about just about pure poly of because

00:56:09.060 he corrects journalists every single time he corrects a journalist they talk about how he's a fascist and he

00:56:13.800 hates the media and that he's secretly far right and somehow this is not good enough for babo over

00:56:20.180 here this sweet sweet summer child and uh but he said with a rare exception and i include the toronto

00:56:27.660 star among the exceptions man like i like how he even calls out the toronto star in this article

00:56:33.520 about as not being anti poly of enough and you can guarantee the the toronto star green lit him to say

00:56:38.980 this because he they wanted them they wanted bob to call them out to give them an excuse to be even

00:56:44.820 more anti poly of than they already are and man they're already pretty much at the 11 out of 10 mark

00:56:49.700 for being anti poly of but but sorry restarting there with rare exception i include the toronto star

00:56:55.320 among the exceptions the national oh wait i'm i forgive forgive me i actually read that wrong he's saying

00:57:01.540 that the toronto star because it does a good job calling up poly of i'm sorry for my terrible reading

00:57:05.980 comprehension with rare exceptions and i include the toronto star among the exceptions the national

00:57:11.080 media has given poly of a free pass when it comes to his policies or more accurately his lack of

00:57:15.880 policies instead they focus on poly of his recent moves to improve his image by ditching his glasses

00:57:20.880 and updating his wardrobe they focus on the size of his crowds and on polls horse race aspect of

00:57:26.120 politics they also seem fixated on reporting about what they see as the pending demise of trudeau

00:57:31.920 but it's like how is but their stories it is a story when polls come out and poly of is 15 20 points

00:57:38.380 ahead of the liberals that absolutely is a story and the fact that he had to pull the poly of taking his

00:57:45.360 glasses off story as a story that he's claiming the media is focusing on that's shallow compared to

00:57:51.300 something they should be focusing on that was a few months ago at this point they've been covering

00:57:55.340 everything poly of says on housing on trying to reduce the size of government on all the cuts that he's

00:58:00.440 going to make to like hr and whatnot his thing about being against gender theory in the classroom

00:58:05.080 they covered poly of a lot and they even criticized poly of along the way for not being you know

00:58:09.960 liberal the way aaron o'toole was it happens quite a bit i don't know what planet bob's living on here

00:58:15.360 but the media goes after him all the time but but what the him and the toronto star are advocating

00:58:21.860 here is that they should stop talking about poly of uh like they should stop saying any good news

00:58:27.500 about poly of if he's doing well in the polls if his fundraising numbers are good if he looks like

00:58:31.340 he's going to beat trudeau and if bad numbers come out about trudeau that's all somehow pro-conservative

00:58:36.760 media coverage it's not it's just it's just the facts on the ground and if anything that's the

00:58:41.760 things that the media should be reporting on not these stupid canada press articles where they're

00:58:46.140 accusing poly of of being a conspiracy theorist based on nothing based on like a couple professors

00:58:50.900 saying well some of his language seems conspiratorial because he doesn't like the world economic

00:58:54.880 forum like not liking the world economic forum is like a mainstream position if you read anything

00:59:00.840 that comes out of them you shouldn't like them they're weird proto-socialists they're awful at

00:59:05.300 their jobs you should never like the world there's no reason to like the world economic forum unless

00:59:10.100 you're some like elitist technocrat but like even the left used to dislike the world economic forum but

00:59:14.840 that makes you a conspiracy theorist like according to the objective journalists in the mainstream media

00:59:21.000 in the legacy media in canada but i digress going back to the article uh canada

00:59:27.960 uh yeah so canadians deserve better from their media they deserve to know where poly of stands

00:59:35.380 on major issues of the day rather than having their media merely parrot unquestionably his criticisms

00:59:39.980 of trudeau like well they should question they should cover his criticisms of trudeau just as they

00:59:45.000 cover trudeau's and sings criticisms of poly of sings criticisms of trudeau you know elizabeth may's

00:59:51.380 criticisms of all of them who everyone should ignore because she's crazy but the media does

00:59:55.360 their job for the most part of covering the day-to-day stuff they do a bad job of have always putting in

01:00:00.500 these little liberal like subtle liberal sort of narratives into the media but overall they usually

01:00:06.480 cover the topics that they should be covering this is where like i usually disagree with people

01:00:11.040 and they say cbc is 100 fake news cbc would not be as good of a liberal propaganda outlet if everything

01:00:18.060 that they said was wrong 90 of the things that the cbc says is correct it's the 10 of little bits and

01:00:24.540 pieces of liberal narratives being sort of leached into the coverage that makes them so bad and because

01:00:29.840 like i said before because they're kind of subtle about their liberal bias it actually makes them more

01:00:33.820 effective at sort of stumping against conservatives anyway so getting moving on to the next part

01:00:39.400 uh but if it's the media's job to lay it all out on the line with readers and viewers about poly of

01:00:44.360 that's because poly of has played many different roles during his career from a political attack

01:00:48.940 dog for stephen harper to champ oh i think i missed the last one oh that doesn't mean being seen as

01:00:54.400 shills for the liberals or giving up any sense of journalistic fairness which in itself might be a

01:00:58.800 fresh concept for the national post or toronto sun oh digging at the toronto sun and national post

01:01:03.560 because they're slightly conservative sometimes both of which are openly hostile to trudeau filling their pages

01:01:08.300 and websites with pro poly of pieces the globe of mail ctv and even the cbc aren't much better on

01:01:13.580 some days but it's the media's job to lay it all out on the line with readers and viewers about poly of

01:01:18.460 that's because poly of has played many different roles during his career from political attack dog for

01:01:22.860 stephen harper to champion of freedom loving trucker uh the the freedom of loving trucker convoys and

01:01:27.960 because many of his past views and actions have been disturbing if not outright dangerous i love how he puts the

01:01:33.880 little quotes around freedom loving as if again like i said earlier as if it's a question whether

01:01:39.220 or not the people of participating the trucker convoy were freedom loving you don't have to like them or

01:01:44.440 disagree with them i think they were mostly right about what they were protesting but it's not like

01:01:49.300 it's not an opinion whether they were freedom loving or not they were you can disagree with what

01:01:54.340 they wanted but it wasn't because they hated freedom like let's be clear here and uh i'm sorry but

01:02:00.360 next paragraph he says as prime minister uh would probably have still embraced the controversial

01:02:05.080 use of bitcoin which he has in the past would he still march with with anarchistic truckers blocking

01:02:11.420 streets and highways would he ignore medical experts on the need for vaccine mandates if

01:02:15.640 the need for vaccine mandates because canada is currently dying because we did not we got rid of

01:02:21.400 the mandates for vaccines whatever i said would he still ignore medical experts on the need for

01:02:26.980 vaccine mandates if covid rears up again covid rears up again what do you do what these people don't

01:02:32.740 understand the viruses get weaker over time so if there's any amount of people getting covid again

01:02:36.640 we have to mandate this thing like this is where again people call the toronto star the red star for

01:02:41.420 a reason and now back to the the quotation how would he deal with quebec's demands to give it

01:02:47.740 to give it more special powers how would he balance the budget while reducing taxes what programs would

01:02:52.940 be cut how would he fix grocery prices what would he do about the housing economy and climate change and

01:02:57.340 let me just stop here how would he fix grocery prices it's not the government's job to fix grocery

01:03:03.340 prices and i'm not sure if he means this in like the fix the price and set the price like where the

01:03:08.280 government says this item is five dollars and you must like you must list it for five dollars or he

01:03:13.240 means that just fix the issue but it's not the government's job to fix the issue we're currently in the

01:03:18.420 mire that we are because the government doesn't stop trying to fix issues that they can only make

01:03:23.280 worse and on other things in this like sentence he's like what how would he balance the budget while

01:03:28.320 reducing taxes this guy lives in such a bubble he doesn't realize that actually reducing taxes can

01:03:35.100 increase revenues can is at the point where we have so many taxes we're chasing people down to the

01:03:39.940 united states if we reduce taxes in a few years we'd actually probably have like surpluses again we'd

01:03:46.560 probably be able to bring in way more tax dollars by actually like by actually um by reducing taxes

01:03:53.720 and attracting more business to canada but because he's so left-wing he can't understand that you can

01:03:58.840 pay for things without having skyrocketing like skyrocketing taxes and even then does this guy even

01:04:04.320 care if there's going to be some deficit spending you can you can not you can like deficit spend a

01:04:09.920 little bit while cutting some taxes that's completely fine but this guy said now he suddenly cares about

01:04:14.660 balanced budgets when it was brought up about a conservative but like in this article and like

01:04:20.080 going back a little bit i'm not going to read anything again but a lot of the stuff they're

01:04:23.800 basically he's asking like why isn't the media criticizing things about just about polio's government

01:04:29.240 that they don't know will be a thing yet basically they should say that he wants them to say

01:04:35.380 basically that pure polio's gonna push your grandmother down the stairs they're gonna take away

01:04:39.640 her cpp they're going to destroy the environment they're going to do and this that and the other

01:04:43.960 thing and he's criticizing the media for not being left-wing commentators basically that they should

01:04:49.160 be sitting around talking about all the potential dangers of having pure polio as the as the prime

01:04:54.760 minister like it's ridiculous but this is where the media has gotten themselves they're so used to

01:05:00.960 the media having a left-wing bias they think it's actually being pro-conservative to not smear

01:05:06.480 conservatives oh but that's kind i'm trying to start moving towards wrapping up since i've been

01:05:12.460 doing this for about an hour but this is why this is why i kind of wanted to talk about this it it's

01:05:17.820 ridiculous to see the media's reaction to a conservative being popular in the country and

01:05:23.080 knowing how to deal with the media i want to give way more conservative mps media training because a lot

01:05:29.080 of them still have this reaction where if the media comes after them with a tough question or sends them

01:05:33.300 a media request alleging they did something wrong they jump foot to foot to apologize or to try and

01:05:39.040 contextualize and do all this other stuff when like polio like i think he is a genius in this aspect

01:05:45.120 like the like the curious mind is saying that you have to push back on them you have to question the

01:05:51.140 premises they hit you with it's not it's weak to just it's a week to apologize for something that

01:05:57.640 you did not do wrong and the media because they're so used to conservatives just conceding

01:06:03.120 they're they think this is bullying and i just want to quickly jump over to the clip of chantelle

01:06:07.820 hubert talking on rosemary barton's show on cbc claiming that polio is like a bully of some sort

01:06:13.720 i'll maybe you add and let the let andrew coin speak a little bit in this clip as well because

01:06:18.440 always like dunking on him a bit it will be very hard to sell a leader who is turning out to be an

01:06:26.820 intellectual bully especially one who picks who for two people on people who are smaller than him in

01:06:34.520 the sense that the journalist asking a question is uh smaller than someone who's who is the leader of a

01:06:40.580 major party and uh i don't know what uh what is being said outside quebec in the other language

01:06:48.440 but i was on a panel today and the words i used associated with uh pierre poilier and they are

01:06:55.720 gaining currency is that he is a uh someone who will lie whenever it suits his purpose

01:07:01.900 last word to you andrew well and it depends what kind of leader you're looking at you know it used to

01:07:07.160 be we looked for leaders we wanted to look up to them we wanted leaders and we looked up them

01:07:11.320 because they were able to rise above these kind of petty squabbles uh this is small and insecure and

01:07:17.020 it appeals to people who want a leader who's they don't have to look up to who's just as small and

01:07:21.080 insecure as they are that's not the kind i think that most canadians are looking for i think they

01:07:25.260 want people who i just want to cut up andrew coin there andrew coin is just so petty he wants someone

01:07:32.580 who makes he wants a leader who makes him feel intellectual like i said in my last video

01:07:36.260 he loved erin o'toole because erin o'toole puts up 50 page policy papers he he kind of talks in this

01:07:43.660 nuanced way about bringing people together and we can't be too conservative we gotta come to the

01:07:48.020 middle and andrew coin even though he's technically a conservative writer he's not conservative in any

01:07:53.500 way shape or form his job in the media is to say i'm the conservative and if the conservatives want

01:07:59.440 to win or they want to win the next election or uh to be really conservative they actually have to

01:08:04.260 become more liberal that's andrew coin's argument every single time there's a new leadership race

01:08:09.920 or uh or there's a new conservative leaders that they have to start becoming less conservative

01:08:14.580 and that makes them actually conservative by my book andrew coin is like a managerial technocratic

01:08:21.420 kind of person if you ever read his article he wrote this article on what conservatism is it's full

01:08:26.380 of these weird sweeping uh like soliloquic kind of statements about how amazing the institutions

01:08:32.620 of canada are he he could find the man could never find a single dollar in the government he wants

01:08:37.260 to cut because he considers being a conservative in his mind as someone who is loyal to canada's

01:08:41.940 institutions so you're basically he's basically loyal to whatever the liberals just did so he thinks

01:08:47.340 that cutting anything is bad but going back to the start of that clip chantal hubert one she tries

01:08:52.860 to call polly of an intellectual bully for correcting that canada press journalist and because oh she's

01:08:58.140 smaller than him i assume that she does she doesn't mean in a physical sense i assume she means by like

01:09:03.180 a power or some marxist power sense she has less power so he's bullying her and he's oppressing her

01:09:09.180 by correcting her again that's ridiculous any party leader is bigger than any journalist who talks to

01:09:15.500 them but it would be ridiculous to say that if a conservative journalist acts asks justin trudeau a question

01:09:21.740 and he sort of snide like sort of like uh like responds to them in a very snide or uh or cynical

01:09:27.740 way or whatever corrects them if they said something wrong it would be ridiculous to say he was bullying

01:09:32.460 them but this is what the but there's a double standard of the media again the media is never going to

01:09:37.340 complain if justin trudeau and or his handlers mistreat uh sheila gun reid or drea humphrey at the um

01:09:46.700 at rebel news they'll never do that if they if they're rude if he's rude to candace malcolm they

01:09:50.860 don't care he doesn't they don't care if he's rude to a female journalist and i mean like objectively

01:09:55.820 rude like his handlers like drag them to the side or he says something insulting to them they won't they

01:10:01.500 they will never care that's just not well they only care if it's a conservative a conservative or a

01:10:06.700 liberal journalist asking a conservative a question and then getting pushback and remember and notice

01:10:12.700 what chantel hubert said in the middle of her statement there she said that i've been going

01:10:17.500 on media saying that poliev is like uh someone who will lie about anything to get power and he's

01:10:23.820 like a bully and whatnot and she said it's starting to stick she's like oh she's like openly saying i

01:10:29.580 am trying to manufacture a narrative and i'm starting to get it repeated in other media sources all these

01:10:36.380 people do not actually see their jobs as like holding people accountable or standing up for

01:10:42.300 factual information and good reporting and trying to be the fifth estate to the canadian government

01:10:47.340 and politicians these people see themselves as narrative runners and you could say well chantal

01:10:52.780 is a uh is a commentator and fair enough i'd still say it's a little over the line as a commentator

01:10:58.700 to say that i'm trying to launder this narrative into the media because she doesn't seem to think that

01:11:03.020 it's correct she just seems to just think that that she's repeating something enough to try and get

01:11:07.820 it past canadian's kind of you know bs alarm in their head to make them think that wait up i guess

01:11:13.740 polyev will lie about anything to get power what lie like again apolly was there he'd probably say

01:11:18.700 which lie what did i say that was like factually incorrect the only thing they can point to is the

01:11:23.820 rainbow bridge explosion or fireball and that was ctv news and other media outlets fault for reporting it

01:11:30.380 it was it was the fault of lefty journalists for misreporting it as a potential terrorist attack

01:11:35.340 he mentioned the report and now it's somehow his fault for saying it whatever whatever but that's

01:11:40.860 just that's just how crazy the media has gotten these days they're tired and i'm tired too right now

01:11:46.220 anyways but to plug a few things before we end here i'll just throw my gifts and go um link in the

01:11:51.420 description of the video or the comment section if you want to donate to my legal fund it would really

01:11:56.540 help me out uh you can basically throw in anything from five bucks to whatever your mind can imagine

01:12:02.060 but this this illegal case has actually been costing me a lot of money i think i'm past the 25 000 mark

01:12:07.820 of all my legal fees to defend myself from this chinese billionaire i'm winning at the same time a

01:12:12.780 lot of their current legal tactics are just meant to try and bleed me by just intentionally taking too

01:12:18.540 long taking long times to file things the questioning went on for six hours and it could have been two

01:12:23.500 but they kept asking me the same stupid questions over and over again as if they were going to get

01:12:27.580 me to admit to something that wasn't true i'm me and the national telegraph the national telegraph and i

01:12:33.420 are fully in the right here and all they have is basically accusing me of or trying to see like

01:12:39.980 find little facts about the case to see if like to trip me up it's like oh so so you don't know x or y

01:12:46.460 thing it's like well usually the thing that they're trying to catch me on doesn't even matter at all but

01:12:50.700 i can't go into the actual details of the case it's just one of those things where you can get

01:12:54.940 like held on being malicious or something like that it happens a lot in cases even if you're on the

01:12:59.420 right if you keep talking about the case they'll say that you're somehow being malicious it's very

01:13:03.660 stupid uh other than that i also wanted to throw in the uh the the url for my website whiteplaypool.com

01:13:10.540 in the comment section if you live in calgary signal hill the riding on the west side of calgary

01:13:16.700 make sure to buy a conservative party membership for you and your family because i am running for

01:13:21.340 the conservative nomination this running my paperwork to be on the nomination ballot is almost

01:13:26.060 in and by voting for me you can actually have a real conservative running in the area and if you

01:13:31.100 do live in the area and you are planning on voting for me number one i would endorse michael

01:13:35.020 kim as a great number two since it's a ranked ballot and there's like 12 people running right now

01:13:39.740 it's actually getting ridiculously packed but other than that i may stay here for like a couple more

01:13:45.660 minutes in case anyone has any questions which i will totally take and thanks also again for uh

01:13:50.780 what was his name uh pitsky for having donated 40 during the live stream and a thanks again to denise

01:13:56.700 for over the past couple of months donating 800 to my legal fund that has helped me out immeasurably

01:14:02.860 and i'm actually pretty impressed with the amount of people who've been watching today we've like we

01:14:06.300 at one point spiked at like 170 people watching concurrently so this is the kind of viewership numbers

01:14:11.740 of people who are interested in watching a live stream one i promise the live streams will get

01:14:16.060 better this was very rusty and rough with me alone because i'm not used to doing a live stream by

01:14:20.700 myself um but i could do some sunday live streams like this on different topics from the week that

01:14:26.380 i want to drill it down on a little bit more that i didn't feel like my video got to fully cover every

01:14:31.260 nook and cranny of it and um but i will try and get do some of some more live streams with daniel we

01:14:38.220 just had to make our we just had to make our schedules line up oftentimes i'll be out door

01:14:42.860 knocking in the riding for myself i don't door knock on sundays because there's a lot of people

01:14:47.180 understandably don't want you coming by their house on a sunday uh when i'm usually door knocking

01:14:51.980 that's when uh daniel's available for a live stream so the amount of time we have in a week to do a live

01:14:57.420 stream is very limited we might actually do one tomorrow i just come back from door knocking a

01:15:01.820 little bit early to do it like at 7 p.m mountain time 9 p.m uh urinal 9 p.m like eastern oh uh bl

01:15:09.660 because i think you know i remember this is a good question because i remember you asked in another uh

01:15:14.300 video in the comment section when i was going to do a video on door knocking i'm not going to do it here

01:15:18.940 because i don't have enough time but i can walk you through the science of door knocking and how i think

01:15:24.060 that the ucp didn't do a great job of door knocking in the 2023 provincial election because

01:15:29.340 i did tons of door knocking for different candidates and the way that they were doing it

01:15:34.380 was very i think lazy i don't blame the candidates the advice that they were following was coming from

01:15:40.620 the top and it was pretty much just go to doors and voter id people you would go to a door and say

01:15:45.580 are you voting a ucp or an ndp and regardless of what their answer was i found that people weren't

01:15:51.100 instructed to talk to the people at their doors because the ucp's idea was well if you don't

01:15:56.460 don't stay at the door too long because then you can get to other doors i'm like if someone's voting

01:15:59.420 ndp stay at the door as long as you have to to try and convince them either to not show up and vote

01:16:03.900 for the ndp or to and or ideally to vote ucp but they just didn't do that and if all you do is id

01:16:10.860 all you do is basically you just collect the facts on the ground and you do nothing to actually

01:16:16.300 change the facts on the ground there are so many people who are voting ndp or who weren't going to show

01:16:20.460 up and vote for any party who i convinced to vote for the ucp because i stuck it out their door

01:16:25.660 and made very polite and very well reasoned arguments i wasn't like you know fighting

01:16:29.740 with them but i fought it out in a metaphorical sense for the party and flipped a lot of people

01:16:34.860 in calgary bow calgary curry uh calgary cross i didn't doorknock tons of times in all these areas

01:16:40.780 but like i doorknocked enough to get a good feel of like what kind of topics people should be touching

01:16:45.500 on but when all you do is id you basically leave the riding to to be as it you you kind of give the

01:16:51.980 ridings momentum over to the ndp because they're outdoors arguing with people trying to argue in

01:16:56.700 favor their party and if you don't you're basically saying we have 54 of the vote in this riding most

01:17:02.460 likely let's hope that it maintains by election day and if all you do is hope it maintains and

01:17:06.700 the other parties trying to actually gain voters you might find yourself falling behind i guarantee that's

01:17:12.460 why the ucp lost a lot of rides because there's tons of ridings in the city of calgary that were

01:17:17.100 lost by just a handful of votes um oh sorry i just want to answer this one from ls why why even lose

01:17:25.100 your time with such people when i see those flags near their names i ignore them it tells me it's not

01:17:29.820 worth my time i think he's mentioning all the kind of like progressive flags people put up in their bios

01:17:34.620 and whatnot and like i'm pretty pro ukraine i i do find it a little bit insufferable over time whenever

01:17:39.180 people put the latest fad flags in their in their bot in their like profiles half the time the people

01:17:45.740 who have the ukrainian flags in their twitter bios or in their twitter handles or not handles but the

01:17:51.580 the profile name i find those people were not the ones who gave a crap that ukraine got invaded back

01:17:57.340 in 2014 by russia they they weren't they couldn't care less they didn't care obama basically said that

01:18:02.220 he's going to give room for the russians to invade crimea if they let him get re-elected and they didn't

01:18:06.620 do too much none of these people care but suddenly they care because like the the democrats suddenly

01:18:11.980 care about it like these people don't actually care about foreign policy they just care about the

01:18:16.140 issues that they are told to care about it's not it's not that caring about those issues is bad

01:18:20.140 inherently it's that i find it annoying when people care about issues that they clearly don't know

01:18:24.860 anything about um oh 100 i agree yeah they're less furious and they're more just like hysterical these

01:18:35.660 days i don't think the media can actually articulate what's bad about polio they all their insults so

01:18:40.540 far or all their negative words they try and associate with them are very vague they never

01:18:44.700 specifically say well polio lied about this and that makes him bad or polio said this about this

01:18:50.060 person and it was offensive it's just generally he's kind of offensive so they can never name anything

01:18:55.180 and they they're that's why whenever a journalist has confronted polio and they don't have details

01:19:00.460 they get crushed because the media keeps repeating these vague accusations against polio

01:19:04.940 a journalist thinks it's a great line of questioning so they show up at a press conference and say

01:19:08.940 why are you dog whistling to the far right and that person had no idea that they that there was

01:19:13.500 no ammunition behind that accusation but again they're very used to conservative politicians just

01:19:18.220 going with it so they didn't actually care to look up if polio has ever dog whistled to a far

01:19:24.060 right group in his life but they so they just showed up asked the question got wrecked um well i hope

01:19:31.820 i'm considered a door-knocking ninja but you never i don't know i think i'm i think i'm good i'm not

01:19:36.780 amazing but i think i'm good uh i'm definitely a little bit more less charismatic than most people

01:19:42.700 are but i think i know the topic areas i know the kind of like ways of sort of arguing around people's

01:19:50.060 often sometimes very um unsophisticated ways of talking about politics a lot of people like i'll go to

01:19:56.220 doors even now even though it's provincial issues they'll start bringing up app the alberta pension

01:20:00.300 plan and i just assure them it's probably not going to happen anyways and at worst case scenario or

01:20:05.260 best like the scenario that's most likely to happen is that daniel smith will probably get cpp plus

01:20:11.100 benefits for albertans she's asking for too much intentionally hoping she only gets 20 of what she

01:20:16.620 wants which is still better than nothing and that nothing and that 20 might be getting slightly better

01:20:21.980 benefits for those who have lived in alberta for a long enough time so i think a lot of people's

01:20:26.460 anxieties you can kind of alleviate them by just explaining kind of political strategy to them

01:20:31.340 people like feeling in on it they like feeling in the know so giving someone a little bit of

01:20:36.140 education at the door is not being pant not being like patronizing but actually talking to them like

01:20:41.340 they can understand this stuff too makes them far more likely to vote the way you want them to

01:20:47.340 because they feel like you're actually treating them like an adult the ndp does very aggressive

01:20:51.660 door knocking but they do not make people feel like adults they very much talk to people like

01:20:55.900 their children so if the ucp does or any party does the bare minimum to actually engaging with people

01:21:01.660 on a one-to-one level they'll do so much better at the doors how do we convince everyone to go and

01:21:09.900 vote i think that people need to honestly i think it's a media issue uh and not an issue with

01:21:15.820 independent media because i'm going to talk about independent media but i think as more canadians

01:21:19.980 start to consume political media they're going to start becoming more knowledgeable about the

01:21:24.860 election issues i find the left has always had a disproportionately good outcome to their party's

01:21:30.300 actual popularity in canada because there's so many left-wing media like a government subsidized

01:21:35.340 media outlets the left-wing voters i think they're very deeply misinformed about a lot of issues

01:21:41.260 but to themselves they're very informed so they're very active this is why the left often wins

01:21:46.060 municipal elections because their people are the most politically empowered people to show up and

01:21:50.460 vote i find conservatives are often very in the dark about what the current issues are they know

01:21:55.820 all the things they don't like about trudeau because they experience all the bad things that are going

01:21:59.340 on but day to day there's not that many of them who are watching independent media who know how bad

01:22:05.500 it currently is and feel competent enough about the political system to show up and vote in elections

01:22:10.780 a lot of people don't show up from the conservative side or they don't show up for the

01:22:14.540 conservatives because i think that there's not enough conservative narratives out there normalizing

01:22:18.780 voting conservative as normal as it is to vote conservative i think that the conservative

01:22:23.020 numbers are actually understated for how popular they could be if the popularity of conservative

01:22:28.380 media was a little bit more like the legacy media currently is the legacy me is not popular they just

01:22:33.740 have artificial saturation sorry there's so many questions i can't even end the live stream but i'm

01:22:39.900 okay with it uh why do you why do you believe people vote for parties like the ndp or the greens

01:22:45.340 at the end of the day i think a lot of these parties like again i'm never gonna accuse anyone of

01:22:49.500 voting for a party because they were tricked into it that's where the ppc does so bad they pretend that

01:22:55.100 people vote conservative because they're fooled into it they're not people align up better with

01:23:00.140 the conservative party than they do with the ppc because the ppc gets it wrong that being ideologically

01:23:06.700 purist and i don't even think they're really that purist on a lot of issues i think they just fancy

01:23:10.220 themselves purist by being purist that somehow they're going to convince people that they're

01:23:14.940 the the like the correct option and that's not how things work people vote for parties because they

01:23:20.220 genuinely believe that that's the party for them they might be misinformed about some issues

01:23:24.860 but people don't show up for the like but you should never become cynical about why people are

01:23:29.260 voting green green voters tend to be i would say oddly conspiracy i'm not trying to smear them but they

01:23:35.740 tend to be oddly conspiratorial left-wing voters they're very granola in their kind of views about

01:23:41.580 medicine and whatnot um they're usually are people who you know favor high taxes heavy restrictions on

01:23:47.660 the environment but they tend to be also a little bit more kind of like new agey in the way that they

01:23:53.820 hate corporations and they're very skeptical about business in general so they tend to be very

01:23:59.260 pro-government programs because they have this idea that somehow government programs you know

01:24:03.740 get away from like corruption like corporate corruption and whatnot so they're very anti-corporate

01:24:09.100 green voters ndp voters i would say tend to be these days they're two things college town voters so

01:24:15.980 college students sort of student union type activists hyper progressives that's very much jagmeet

01:24:21.020 singh's base and then the other the other thing that makes up the ndp base which i think is their

01:24:25.900 more traditional base is the sort of like union voter the trade unionist voter uh especially public sector

01:24:33.340 union voters tend to go for the ndp because they are a very blatantly pro-union party where the

01:24:40.780 liberals oddly enough are a kind of old pensioner party their voting base is actually disproportionately

01:24:47.020 old compared to both the conservatives and the ndp because they very much are trying to appeal to

01:24:52.220 people worried about their cpp benefits and different social services the liberals are the corporate

01:24:57.420 social uh social program party they offer a lot of social programs and they are kind of always

01:25:03.260 pitching themselves as more economically responsible than the ndp because they're more pro-business and

01:25:08.140 than the ndp which is technically true but they're pro-business in the way i said brian mulroney was kind

01:25:13.340 of pro-business they throw a lot of subsidies and other sorts of handouts to businesses they might lower

01:25:18.700 corporate taxes compared to what the ndp would do like obviously they raise corporate taxes compared to the use of

01:25:24.380 the conservatives but they're considered like moderate on economic issues under trudeau they've

01:25:28.940 become wildly left-wing but like when you imagine a paul martin liberal voter it's a liberal voter who

01:25:35.100 who's very concerned about the existence of social programs uh but think that the ndp are too

01:25:41.100 economically destructive that's kind of what their whole thing is my opinion on new blue which is the

01:25:47.580 new blue party of ontario is i like them i like them far more than doug ford's pc party because

01:25:53.340 the pcs have not proven that they're much different than the liberals and someone might

01:25:57.500 say hypocrites because i don't like the ppc much these days uh but i like the concerted party but

01:26:02.620 now i'm saying i don't like the pcs in ontario the pcs in ontario and the concerted parties federally

01:26:07.420 are like very different animals the pcs on ontario have spent more than kathleen wynne's liberal party

01:26:14.060 ever did it's very much a corporate bloated uh party like all their corporate corruption scandals

01:26:21.340 really kind of show what type of party they are they're a very technocratic kind of a like a

01:26:27.660 conservative party where again because they invest money in job programs and business programs and

01:26:34.540 they create jobs through the private sector by handing out subsidies that they're somehow a pro

01:26:39.580 business conservative party when they're basically just the liberal party but the ratio of jobs they

01:26:44.540 try and create the problem the uh the private sector compared to the public sector is a little bit

01:26:48.700 different but the spending is still wildly high the spending is pretty much equivalent to what

01:26:53.420 a liberal government would do like the ontario pcs are spending more than the liberals and part of

01:26:57.820 that is just due to the population increases in covet but still they the the parties pretty much

01:27:03.660 spend the exact same amount of money on social issues other than very recent and parental rights the

01:27:08.620 the pcs are pretty do nothing they kind of just freeze social issues while they're in government and

01:27:14.700 then when the left takes over they keep on their progressive march so the pcs don't stop them on

01:27:19.180 social issues they just don't take any hard positions but on economic issues it's still bloated

01:27:23.900 corporatist type policies but more private sector friendly i guess that's what i would put out

01:27:30.620 i i would sum it up as and um joe's very correct the ontario pcs are very milquetoast and i

01:27:37.260 would say that's exactly why the manitoba pcs also lost their election uh in 2023 against uh that rob

01:27:44.700 canoe guy or his name's not rob over that uh the premier canoe one because and people are trying

01:27:50.380 to blame it that the ontario or the manitoba pcs were so socially conservative because they started

01:27:55.260 embracing parental rights and whatnot and that's why they lost the the the manitoba pcs were pretty

01:28:00.220 much destined to lose they actually probably clawed back a lot of seats with that parental rights

01:28:03.900 stand the the manitoba pcs were a big spending bloated pc party it is the typical brian

01:28:11.900 malroney formula of spending a lot of money but you spent it on job programs so you're a conservative

01:28:17.180 it's not conservative at all and that's why conservatives didn't show up to defend the

01:28:20.540 manitoba pcs uh i'm sorry i'm just trying to see if i missed any other things uh

01:28:31.100 oh and i think he does because jody says i think pure poly needs to denounce the far-right

01:28:34.780 channel the libs throw at the libs throw at the media um i think i assume what you mean is like

01:28:41.340 the liberals through the media throwing up poly of that he's far right or he has connections far

01:28:45.660 right he's done a pretty good job i think of going after them on that and showing that those accusations

01:28:49.900 have nothing behind them uh my view of the christian heritage party is that it's not even that christian

01:28:55.500 of a party and i don't really get the point of the party outside of being an activist group uh when i say

01:29:00.300 they're not that christian i mean in the sense that it's kind of that so it's such an ecumenical

01:29:05.020 party it just kind of is generic christianity at this point it's not exactly what they were set up to

01:29:09.820 be back in the day i'm not saying that it would be good for them to be this or not good for them to be

01:29:14.300 this i think the party doesn't really serve a purpose in any way but when they started it was

01:29:18.060 trying to be like a dutch reform calvinist party and actually the netherlands has a party they kind

01:29:23.100 of base themselves off of that actually has seats there um but they don't really serve any

01:29:27.500 particular purpose and i think that their voters that they go after are too specific for them to

01:29:32.300 ever win a seat same kind of thing as the ppc the ppc doesn't want to think of themselves like the

01:29:37.100 christian heritage party but the ppc is kind of and i'm trying to be insulting because i voted ppc in

01:29:42.940 2021 because o2 was so awful but since 21 i think the problem with the ppc is it's become the party for

01:29:50.620 guys in plaid jackets who like to tell it how it is tell it like it is that's very much i think the

01:29:56.540 slogan that goes along with the the ppc tell it like it is and while they they oftentimes are

01:30:02.140 telling it like it is they do no work to actually make sure they can win a seat so it becomes all

01:30:07.020 for naught and i think they actually go in their attempt to be more purist than the conservative

01:30:12.140 party on many issues i think they actually become very left-leaning on certain issues they're very

01:30:18.060 isolationist in a very left-wing style on foreign policy uh they become very protectionist on certain

01:30:23.420 trade matters even though they started off as like the anti um you know the anti sort of dairy

01:30:28.300 cartel party they became kind of a party that thinks that we should be making manufacturing from

01:30:33.580 home and we should be mandating manufacturing from home and stuff like that it's just become a party

01:30:37.420 where twitter controls their opinions too much like maxim bergen is a very socially left-wing politician

01:30:43.900 he's more economically conservative i'd give him that but on social issues he's always been left-wing

01:30:48.940 so then in when he was in that manitoba riding he's running in for the by-election against brandon

01:30:54.380 leslie when he's pretending like he's somehow pro-life now it didn't hold up at all because he's been

01:30:59.100 famously pro-abortion for his entire career um and i think that i don't mind if people shift in a good

01:31:05.340 direction on an issue the problem is it just didn't track well at all with with maxime bernier so

01:31:11.820 people don't trust him also here's my thing with the pbc and now the video has been going

01:31:16.700 on for an hour and a half but whatever you 107 people are fantastic for sticking around

01:31:22.140 my problem with bernier goes back to the 2019 race and it is a tactical issue i have other issues

01:31:27.980 with him like i don't think christine anderson's a nazi in any way i just i also don't think talking

01:31:32.780 to her is smart because i don't think christine anderson has anything to offer i think that she's

01:31:36.620 just trying to mine social media clips so i don't think talking to her actually builds out

01:31:41.660 your party i think maxime bernier is just trying to get attention and in his attention seeking

01:31:46.620 type of style politics he could have won his riding in bose back in 2019 he just didn't focus on

01:31:53.980 winning it he was driving all around the country doing rallies and ridings that he had no chance of

01:31:59.340 winning and i know that the ppc has a strong base of support for a new party out in kind of rural

01:32:05.820 saskatchewan and rural alberta i'm never going to argue with that they even do decently well in

01:32:10.060 the polls still in saskatchewan they still can't win any seats but you know 12 whenever they can pull

01:32:15.580 off a result like that in a poll still impressive out there i'm never going to take that away from

01:32:19.340 them but but if bernier really wanted to be in parliament i think he could have and i think he knew

01:32:25.580 that if he worked really hard to win the bose riding he stayed in the riding he focused all of the

01:32:30.140 resources of his party in bose he could have held on to the seat and he could have built the party out

01:32:34.780 i don't think he wanted to win a seat because as soon as he has to win a seat he actually has to

01:32:38.620 do stuff he gets 114 000 a year to just be the leader of the ppc right now and i think his party

01:32:45.900 would expect him to stop taking that salary if he won his parliamentary seat back and i have some

01:32:50.940 people say well if he became a parliamentarian he could be making 180 000 a year i'm like it's

01:32:56.300 actually not that much more after you take in the higher taxes into account and what would you

01:33:00.940 rather have 114 000 obviously after taxes is a little bit different but what would you rather

01:33:06.060 have 114 000 no strings attached you can do whatever you want sit around your couch tweeting all day i

01:33:11.100 wouldn't want to do that because i actually like responsibility or i think a lot of people would

01:33:15.900 rather have that than 180 000 to work like a dog all day long as the only mp in a like in a new party

01:33:23.820 i don't think he was up for the task and i think it proved it by not doing any campaigning in bose in

01:33:28.700 2019 and then again not doing any campaigning in bose in 2021 he campaigned somewhat hard in

01:33:35.180 the by-election in manitoba but again he knew that by-election was coming for months and he only

01:33:40.060 showed up and started campaigning right when the writ was dropped and it was mentioned that you could

01:33:44.140 start putting up on signs he could have been there six months in advance because everyone knew

01:33:47.900 candace bergen wasn't going to run again and there was going to be a by-election he showed up made a

01:33:52.380 great effort like i made a great appearance at being uh efforting and that was kind of it and i've

01:33:57.660 talked to so many ppc organizers who have left or been kicked out of the party since then who say

01:34:02.700 that yes the party doesn't seem actually focused on growing so that's their biggest issue and overall

01:34:08.540 as much as they want to attack the the slander of the conservative party since o'toole left and i did

01:34:13.340 not like o'toole that's why i could not vote for the conservatives under him overall aaron o'toole

01:34:18.540 is actually aaron tool after a virtual with poly of the party is so much more willing to let any kind

01:34:24.940 of conservative run for the party as long as you haven't done something like absolutely insane in

01:34:28.460 your past obviously even then i still think that i don't think it's worth dqing people for any reason

01:34:33.660 because if they're a bad candidate the local voters are probably going to understand that and vote

01:34:37.820 against them but the but like the paul the conservative party is actually pretty good on

01:34:42.860 all the issues these days yes the the pbc can say well it could be a little bit better on this or they

01:34:47.260 need to talk more about this issue at the end of the day you know the point of politics is to get

01:34:52.060 elected and get your agenda through not to sit around being purer than everyone else or i could

01:34:56.620 just go off and start the wyatt claypool party and 100 this serves the interests of me wyatt claypool

01:35:02.540 and i can say every other party is unsatisfactory compared to the wyatt claypool party but that's not

01:35:07.420 how politics works politics is to a certain extent about deal making about trying to get your agenda

01:35:12.700 across and it's about every day waking up and pounding the ball a little bit further downfield

01:35:17.740 sometimes the conservative party becomes so hyper pragmatic and obsessed with trying to

01:35:22.700 whittle themselves into the middle like under o'toole they become useless entirely but if you do it

01:35:28.060 right you you stick as close to your agenda as you would want to while also having to make compromises

01:35:34.380 here and there to get at least some of it across the finish line the ppc is basically saying it's okay

01:35:39.020 to get none of it across the finish line as long as you strongly believe in the agenda in your heart and

01:35:43.980 that's not really good enough in a actual three-dimensional world with you know sounds

01:35:48.220 tastes and uh and uh and emotions you actually have to work in the world that's uh that's in front of

01:35:54.140 you um yeah then we should just start the national telegraph party and we will fully uh we will fully

01:36:01.420 have everyone in chat on board to vote for us but obviously that's a stupid idea

01:36:05.580 uh sorry like people are will polyev uh support the expansion of five eyes to include japan and

01:36:13.660 india i i don't know about that uh that's actually a more much more obscure question than i'm used to

01:36:18.220 but i i will look into that after that words because that's interesting um

01:36:25.660 will polyev try to ally with israel against hamas i think he's actually already pretty

01:36:30.780 pro-israel these days even overall trudeau and the canadian government's pretty pro-israel the

01:36:37.020 thing is that what i don't like is the random side swiping of israel like when trudeau comes

01:36:41.500 out and pretends like he needs to tell the israeli government not to kill children as if

01:36:45.260 the israeli government is targeting any civilians they're targeting hamas who loves to hide behind

01:36:49.740 civilians and you cannot accept the tactic you cannot respect the tactic of hiding behind a human shield

01:36:55.980 by stopping gunfire basically what all these people saying ceasefire now there's civilians dying

01:37:00.940 that means this rule shouldn't be allowed to fire on hamas all these people what would they say if i

01:37:05.740 to the hypothetical that so you're saying the germans all they had to do to not have the normandy

01:37:10.860 invasion happen was just line up a bunch of dutch and french civilians along the coastline and the

01:37:17.500 allies weren't allowed to invade because if the allies invade they're going to kill all these civilians

01:37:21.820 that's obviously ridiculous and the best way of having people to stop hiding behind human shields

01:37:27.580 is you open fire if they hide behind human shields anyways i'm not saying to kill civilians obviously

01:37:33.660 but the whole point is after sufficient warnings stop hiding behind human shields or get these people

01:37:38.540 out of this building we are going to have to fire on it because you're storing missiles underneath it

01:37:42.460 if you do that enough the enemy is going to stop hiding behind the human shields because it's a

01:37:45.820 hindrance to them i like this from bl in french accent i am maxime bernier and i will rule canada

01:37:53.980 like a twitch poll a political live streamer uh oh sorry not to offend all the french people who

01:38:01.340 probably don't watch me but i had to read that in the accent pitch to me uh and to end off the uh

01:38:07.980 end off the uh i will answer this before i end it off trudeau sent uh 10 billion dollars to ukraine

01:38:13.100 and wants to continue the war but he wants israel to stop attacking mass terrorists what yeah it's

01:38:17.420 kind of ridiculous i'm one of those people who like i think the initial support financially for ukraine

01:38:22.700 100 justified uh you like anyone who thinks that like russia is the super base trad state in which

01:38:30.620 traditional values are respected all this stuff doesn't know russia it is a very atheistic country

01:38:35.900 it's a very authoritarian proto-socialist country and i think it was good to back ukraine in not being taken

01:38:41.740 over by the russian government at the same time i would very much agree with someone like ben shapiro

01:38:46.060 that at this point any extra funding it should be getting rolled back because it doesn't seem like

01:38:50.940 ukraine has any ability to make any ground so at this point it's basically paying the ukrainians

01:38:55.260 to get people killed because if we they can't take any more ground there's no point in having world

01:38:59.260 war one style charges um over into enemy territory at this point um uh norm says i believe canada is

01:39:08.380 trying to trudeau's trying to break canada to the point that we are going to be so financially

01:39:12.380 desperate that our only option will be asked ws to rescue us well uh your thoughts i don't i don't

01:39:17.340 think that that's how it would work my my thoughts on the wef is not that they control anything or that

01:39:22.300 we're going to be subservient to them this is what me and daniel say all the time we don't believe in

01:39:27.020 conspiracies of competence we believe in conspiracies of incompetence leftist politicians listen to the wef

01:39:33.420 because the ideas of the wef heavily already line up with their own ideas they're very technocratic

01:39:38.540 people who believe themselves smarter than everyone else so everyone should listen to them at the same

01:39:43.100 time these people are not very smart themselves so they'll they'll just basically copy the wf's

01:39:47.180 homework on every issue because it makes it far easier on them to come up with policies by just

01:39:52.060 cheating off the wf than doing anything else the wf doesn't actually have any money it's kind of just a

01:39:57.500 you know it's kind of just a club for people who think that they're smart way smarter than they

01:40:02.460 really are and who still believe in trade unionist economics you know the economic system of fascist

01:40:08.300 italy uh that led italy to be a mediocre economy the entire time mussolini was their dictator uh but

01:40:15.660 that's really the thing behind the wf is that it just gives very ego stroking ideas to politicians so

01:40:23.420 that politicians naturally follow them because the ideas of the wf very much are ego ego satisfying ideas

01:40:29.980 i don't think he's trying to financially break us to uh to like submit like to you know make us

01:40:35.820 subservient to another group i think trudeau is just okay with hurting our economy because you know the

01:40:40.700 more people he gets on social uh security and welfare and whatnot it bolsters up his voting base and i

01:40:47.020 think that he has a grand progressive vision so he doesn't really care how many eggs he has to break

01:40:51.100 economically in order to move us towards this more government uh controlled uh sort of society

01:40:57.340 that he wants and not not like in a conspiratorial way where he wants to like you know tattoo a number

01:41:01.820 on your forehead or anything like that but you know people who are pro big government tend to want to

01:41:06.460 push policies that make the government bigger and they're kind of okay with hurting some people's

01:41:11.660 businesses along the way as long as they get their big government reality later on um

01:41:20.860 well wouldn't russia be a powerful ally i don't really see russia as an ally again you have to

01:41:24.860 actually look at their economy and their values they're not they russia pretends like it's georgia

01:41:30.780 the country to its south that they tried to invade back in 2008 georgia is a very socially conservative

01:41:35.820 economy it's very libertarian as an economy overall there's some corruption issues but you can

01:41:40.220 obviously that's going to happen after you've been part of the soviet union for so long and they

01:41:44.060 only really like got away from the soviet system after 2004 after they kind of threw out all the

01:41:50.060 leftover soviet officials that's the country that russia pretends that it's like it's a very

01:41:55.340 socially conservative country very libertarian economics and they stand against uh you know

01:42:00.620 radicalism and whatnot the the russian government's currently using islamist forces from chechnya

01:42:06.780 in its army they are not exactly a a great ally against global terrorism

01:42:16.140 uh i do not know about this alissa you'd have to look it up and or send me something on it i have no

01:42:19.980 clue what that is about um thank you for learning from me i know the media is going to say that it's

01:42:27.820 dangerous that you learned from me but uh i i tend to be a very moderate person the funny thing is i

01:42:32.540 consider myself very conservative i talk moderately and this is how i think conservatives need like

01:42:38.540 this is how a lot of people on twitter were very very anti-trudeau and they're constantly kind of

01:42:43.420 like what i would say number one thing if you're ever trying to convince people politically stop

01:42:47.100 swearing i'm someone who who shamefully swears in my normal life sometimes also don't because it's the

01:42:53.980 best way of making someone not listen to you you can get you can push any conservative idea as long as

01:42:59.420 you're willing to talk to someone the way they talk about politics so when i'm at doors with people

01:43:03.900 i don't talk the way i would on twitter to them i talk the way they would want they they seem to want

01:43:10.060 people to talk to them uh this is going down a little bit down the rabbit hole a little bit but

01:43:14.140 it's it's like sometimes i even disagree with the way other independent media talks about issues because

01:43:18.220 it's very much click driven kind of language where i'm okay with getting fewer clicks and likes

01:43:23.660 i and viewers in order to you know put out a better form of the message that's more effective

01:43:30.300 at actually converting people into not converting them like i'm saying the right combination of words

01:43:35.580 to get someone to rationally believe what i want but like to give people the right information so that

01:43:39.740 they can come to the the correct conclusions about a matter rather than just talking about trudeau sucks

01:43:44.860 you know scream trudeau blah blah blah it's not helpful that if anything that just makes the

01:43:49.580 the people who are in the middle who think of themselves as very intellectual voters kind of

01:43:53.740 stray stay away from you and think well that person so like you know vulgar i'm going to go

01:43:58.620 vote for trudeau because he's very intellectually satisfying in the way he talks um okay well i think

01:44:05.100 that's a great stopping point or i'm going to be going on forever it is now an hour and 44 minutes

01:44:09.340 and i think i said i was going to stop around an hour and five minutes i will just throw back

01:44:13.260 my the link to my website for my political thing in uh the comment section uh if you live in calgary

01:44:21.020 signal hill make sure to buy a concerted party membership and vote for me sign up on the website

01:44:24.940 for the email updates that would be fantastic and also there is the legal fundraiser link to my gifts

01:44:29.820 and go if you can donate anything to that that's amazing uh very much appreciated and i know that ann

01:44:36.380 just said it asked another question if you if you copy and paste that question to another file to

01:44:42.300 another blank document and you ask it in the next live stream i will 100 answer it but i have to go

01:44:48.780 and eat food before i starve to death although you could argue i should probably lose weight but that

01:44:53.340 doesn't matter for another time uh thanks for tuning in everyone this has been a blast for my first solo

01:44:58.860 live stream they will get better i will get better at reading on the fly i blame ipolitics for having a

01:45:04.380 screen that makes it very hard for my eyes to uh see the difference between the uh like i don't know

01:45:10.540 ipolitics's background maybe i have to turn to night mode on the computer but like the the sort of blackish

01:45:16.220 gray text on the white background is horrifying to read so you know other than that i'll see you guys

01:45:21.900 guys all next time hopefully tomorrow

01:45:27.740 you

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - November 27, 2023

The Media Is Furious At Poilievre's Success

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript