The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - December 24, 2025


Trouble in Paradise for Carney - Liberal Infighting and poor performance!


Episode Stats

Length

19 minutes

Words per Minute

196.08734

Word Count

3,742

Sentence Count

220

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

1


Summary

Wyatt Claypool talks about why Mark Carney is getting under a lot of people s skin, and why the Liberal Party is already getting tired of him. He also talks about the infighting in the cabinet, and what it means for the future of the party.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. If there is going to be an election in the year 2026, you don't want
00:00:07.740 to be Prime Minister Mark Carney or the Liberals going into it. This doesn't mean the Liberals
00:00:12.820 couldn't win another election in the year 2026. Frankly, the Liberals and Conservatives always
00:00:18.140 have a chance of winning because they're the top two parties. But Carney used to actually be doing
00:00:23.420 quite well a couple of months ago. His approval ratings were good, the Liberals had a five to
00:00:28.660 six-point lead over the Conservatives and most of the pollsters. But now we've had polls come out
00:00:34.240 from six different pollsters showing the Liberals are sliding and Mark Carney's personal approval
00:00:40.400 rating is also sliding, which was kind of shocking to me because I always saw him as a figure who's
00:00:46.800 probably always going to be somewhat popular because he's so boring you can't really hate him.
00:00:52.380 Trudeau was very easy to hate. He's a larger-than-life personality that demands that you
00:00:57.900 absolutely love him or you hate his guts. And by the end of his term as Prime Minister,
00:01:02.580 everyone had pretty much concluded that they hate his guts. But Carney's mediocre performance,
00:01:08.120 I think, is actually getting under a lot of people's skin right now. But we are not here
00:01:11.740 to talk about the polling. The polling is probably already undermining the Liberals' confidence in being
00:01:16.800 able to win another election. But the news today is even worse because they were sliding before a bunch
00:01:23.720 of this news came out. Liberal infighting, bad economic numbers, and it doesn't matter what the spin
00:01:29.880 in the media is, they're not going to be able to make Canadians just put up with more mediocre
00:01:36.120 garbage from their government. Trudeau was bad, but on an average date, he was just kind of mediocre.
00:01:42.400 He just didn't get anything good done. Yeah, there was a lot of bad stuff happening, but the bad stuff was
00:01:47.000 kind of happening slowly over time. Most governments are so incompetent, things are always
00:01:52.340 blowing up. And if you look at it from that lens, Carney is very much like Justin Trudeau. It's just
00:01:58.200 mediocre and somewhat negative every single day, and as it goes on longer and longer, it really gets
00:02:04.280 under people's skin. But Canadians are kind of trained at this point to not put up with this,
00:02:09.260 because they already had 10 years of it with Trudeau, and they're not going to have 10 years of it
00:02:13.220 with Mark Carney again. Anyways, we're about to get into some of these news stories. We're going to
00:02:18.480 start off with the infighting, but before I get to it, I just want to remind you guys, I now have a
00:02:23.000 membership program on the channel. It just helps sustain it and makes it easier for me to operate
00:02:28.140 the channel without having to, you know, desperately rely on the YouTube algorithm to promote my content.
00:02:34.100 So if you go below the video and hit the join button, you can join one of the two tiers. Again, it's just
00:02:38.800 to make the channel more sustainable. I'm not trying to make like a hierarchy of an important
00:02:42.980 subscribers and unimportant subscribers. But now let's get into this interview that he did with
00:02:49.560 Rosemary Barton. They've been kind of putting out clips of it as time goes on. This section is about
00:02:54.980 Mark Carney calling Stephen Gilboa a liar over Stephen Gilboa, saying that he was surprised by
00:03:01.520 him signing that Memorandum of Understanding with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.
00:03:06.420 Yes, I think there's, well, it's not for me to judge. There are some people who were here
00:03:11.520 under previous governments, previous situations, they can judge the degree of delegation.
00:03:15.740 What will come with that is that people won't always say the same thing and talking, but that's
00:03:20.600 great. That's fine. That's healthy. You know, that's normal life. People don't all say the same
00:03:26.080 thing at the same time. But that is the challenging part of the job. Is it not that sometimes you have
00:03:29.480 people who are not happy with what you're doing, openly critical of it, willing to walk away from
00:03:34.280 the cabinet, for instance? Look, this is awkward, because again, the problem is, even though Rosemary
00:03:43.560 Barton's a hack, eventually, even the CBC has to ask the obvious questions around people like Stephen
00:03:49.880 Gilboa and Nate Erskine-Smith and Chrystia Freeland and Jonathan Wilkinson and other people being unhappy
00:03:56.360 with how Mark Carney operates in government. And the funny thing with most of them is that they are
00:04:01.260 criticizing Carney from his left. The thing is that the right flank of the Liberal Party is already
00:04:06.860 kind of getting tired of him, what I call the business liberals. He's not doing good work for
00:04:11.800 the economy. We're going to be getting to that a little bit later in this video. But even Mark Carney
00:04:16.820 trying to pretend he's doing things for the economy is ticking off the green left of the liberals,
00:04:23.120 that being mainly embodied by people like Erskine-Smith and Gilboa.
00:04:27.860 Would I rather that, if we bring it back to Stephen Gilboa, for whom I have tremendous respect,
00:04:35.600 would I rather he had stayed in cabinet? Yes. Would I rather he had been there to see
00:04:40.200 what transpires with the Alberta MOU, to see our climate strategy come out, our nature strategy come
00:04:48.680 out early in the new year, both of which will happen? Yes. So he will continue to inform that,
00:04:55.080 but from farther away. If he's saying that he wishes he stuck around in cabinet to see
00:05:00.240 how it was going to go, is he not kind of giving away the game a little bit, that Carney has no
00:05:05.680 intention of getting a pipeline built? Because the only thing that would make Stephen Gilboa,
00:05:10.340 you know, see and appreciate Carney's climate strategy is if no pipeline actually goes through.
00:05:15.480 So he's almost acting like, Stephen, he didn't understand that I was lying, and he preemptively
00:05:20.360 left. He thinks I'm some oil and gas guy, but if he only stuck around, he would understand exactly
00:05:25.800 what I'm doing here. But I respect, look, I respect those decisions. And
00:05:30.720 But if that was, if that was true, if you wanted him to stay in cabinet, why did you go about it the
00:05:36.440 way you did? Because he didn't know the details. He did. He knew the details. So what, the things that
00:05:41.880 are out there that he has said are not true? I don't know what he, I don't follow everything he says,
00:05:45.960 but let's be very clear. He is, in fact, calling Stephen Gilboa a liar. Mark Carney, again, is not a
00:05:52.600 more conservative prime minister in terms of his actual ideals and ideology. But he's more conservative
00:05:58.180 in the way he like acts day to day. And I mean that at like, the most shallow level, he is more
00:06:05.020 conservative. He makes everyone wear ties and dress shoes at work. He's somebody who doesn't want the
00:06:11.080 activists right on the front bench. So Stephen Gilboa was in cabinet, but he was kind of second
00:06:16.460 tier cabinet. You're going to be in charge of culture and languages. It wasn't even really the
00:06:22.880 full ministry of culture. He was kind of given this like side role. He was borderline just a
00:06:27.400 parliamentary secretary. And so he kind of shoved him over there because Stephen Gilboa is not the suit
00:06:34.500 and tie and, you know, tailored suit kind of atmosphere that he wants. And by doing that,
00:06:40.980 he ticked off Stephen Gilboa, just like he ticked off Nate Erskine-Smith by making him the housing
00:06:45.520 minister prior to the election for only like a couple of weeks. I know he was technically at longer
00:06:51.680 because he was the housing minister for the duration of the election, but you're not doing
00:06:55.600 anything as cabinet minister during the election. He didn't even do anything prior to. And then he dumps
00:07:00.220 Erskine-Smith after the election and he just made this stupid enemy out of nowhere. Now, I don't like
00:07:06.180 Nate. Nate's a left-wing radical, but Carney in pursuing a cabinet full of people he aesthetically
00:07:13.740 wants to be around, like what is it, Gregor Robertson as the new housing minister, even though he's a
00:07:19.720 terrible failed Vancouver mayor. Awful on housing. He's the housing minister because I think it genuinely
00:07:26.560 goes to, he kind of fits into Mark Carney's kind of fake business environment. His kind of,
00:07:34.720 his fake business life of consultants and people who sit on boards and people who, you know, look
00:07:40.600 like a professional. Where Erskine-Smith is the guy who walks around with rolled up sleeves and
00:07:45.920 without a tie on and his shirt not buttoned up all the way. And Gilboa looks like some guy who's about
00:07:51.300 to throw on a Mao jacket and some sort of Soviet hat or something and send people off to the gulags.
00:07:56.220 So even though Carney is on the left, yes, he's like, even Trudeau, none of these people are
00:08:02.660 radical left. That's still NDP, but they're left. But he's just like, Trudeau wanted to be around the
00:08:08.700 more granola, greeny type liberals. And Carney came in and basically sidelined them, causing all this
00:08:14.900 infighting. A lot of people are leaving because they're not being listened to anymore. And maybe
00:08:18.820 that's a good thing, but they're not being replaced by anyone, anyone decent.
00:08:22.100 He knew what was in the MOU. And elements of the MOU were changed consistent with his views.
00:08:28.540 So once he saw the deal, you asked him for more input and were willing to change them?
00:08:34.060 I did change parts of it.
00:08:34.980 But Alberta was not happy with the changes?
00:08:36.980 No, they accepted the changes.
00:08:37.980 Okay. So then what is your understanding of what he wasn't happy with?
00:08:40.980 Well, these are questions for him.
00:08:42.980 Well, I asked Mr. Gilboa, but what did he tell you about things then? What were you not able to give him?
00:08:46.980 What were you not able to give him?
00:08:48.600 We have a different approach.
00:08:50.320 Yeah. So it's probably that they just hate each other. And you can very clearly see that he's not
00:08:55.580 comfortable talking about Stephen Gilboa because it is probably something where if he says too much,
00:09:00.920 it's going to turn into a more hot war between the two. Stephen Gilboa was definitely not sticking
00:09:05.960 around for four years. He's not going to be waiting until the end of his term. He already has his
00:09:09.980 pension. It's more likely the guy's going to put on an orange jumpsuit and try and climb the CN Tower
00:09:14.760 again. And he's going to stick around. And his riding's actually one that he has to be careful.
00:09:20.280 Mark Carney has to be careful to not lose. Can a conservative pick up Stephen Gilboa's riding?
00:09:24.980 Not in a thousand years. It is a riding where literally the conservatives don't even get 10%
00:09:29.600 of the vote. But Stephen Gilboa's riding, prior to him occupying it, was NDP. And prior to that,
00:09:37.560 it was Jill DeSapp, the Bloc Québécois leader's riding. So what's a riding that if Gilboa wants to
00:09:43.060 screw over Carney while he's trying to cobble together a majority by trying to maybe entice
00:09:48.320 some conservatives to cross the floor? If Stephen leaves and if Freeland leaves, her riding actually
00:09:53.040 was NDP at one point. Jonathan Wilkins leaves. His riding used to be conservative alliance way
00:09:58.180 back in the day. You know, enough that in the by-election, those people might show up and throw
00:10:02.660 a conservative in. And there's a couple other areas like Nate Erskine-Smith. You could see an NDP
00:10:06.880 winning that if the news cycle is bad for the liberals. So Carney's in a position where he's trying to get
00:10:12.300 the majority by getting people to floor cross, which is kind of a Pyrrhic victory on his part.
00:10:16.560 If you don't know the different terms for like victory, it's like, you know, a decisive victory
00:10:20.540 is you won flat out. You know, if it was a war, your army took like 2% casualties and you absolutely
00:10:26.820 decimated like 30% of the other armies of the other army and they fled into the forest and were
00:10:33.960 completely broken up and shattered. You know, what Carney's doing with these floor crossings is a
00:10:38.920 Pyrrhic victory. He is technically winning something. He is winning a conservative to come
00:10:43.980 over and sit on his bench. At the same time, a lot of Canadians find it sleazy and undemocratic. Is it
00:10:50.320 allowed? Yes, but it doesn't. You can't change the fact people feel it's undemocratic and they are
00:10:55.380 actually disliking the liberals the more they do stuff like that. But now let's jump over to the
00:11:01.400 economic news and then we will finish up with this really ridiculous segment on the CBC, which should go
00:11:07.260 without saying, where they're trying to, again, pump up Mark Carney and avoid a bunch of the problems.
00:11:12.500 But here's just a small clip from the CBC announcing a big fall on the GDP back in October.
00:11:17.760 A new snapshot of the Canadian economy released today reveals it remains brittle in the face of
00:11:23.880 trade tensions and tariffs. Statistics Canada says GDP numbers for October show the economy shrank by
00:11:30.480 three tenths of one percent. It's the biggest decline in almost three years. The manufacturing sector
00:11:36.080 decreased by one and a half percent, while wood manufacturing dropped over seven percent. In
00:11:42.020 total, 11 out of 20 industries experienced a decline. Stay with us. You're watching CBC News
00:11:48.740 Network. There's plenty more. This is something that we didn't talk about too much in detail during one
00:11:53.920 of my last polling videos. But if you look where Carney is losing support federally with the liberals,
00:11:59.200 it's in Ontario. That is the big area where the liberals are slipping down three, four, five points,
00:12:05.220 and the conservatives and the NDP are gaining. It's these manufacturing towns that many of them
00:12:10.320 went conservative in this last election. And now it looks like in places like Hamilton and an other
00:12:15.420 place in the southwest of Ontario, the conservatives are going to clean up the rest of it, or even the
00:12:19.540 NDP is going to capture a riding back from the liberals. The liberals are not in a super hot position
00:12:25.060 on the economy. And this is where I'm saying the business liberals are mad at Carney. They're the
00:12:29.620 people who they look at the economic numbers. And if they're bad, they leave. That's just how it
00:12:33.820 works. They're not social conservatives. They're not cultural conservatives. They may not even be
00:12:38.060 social liberals. They're just what you call business liberals, because as long as the liberals are
00:12:43.100 injecting money into the economy and keeping it moving and keeping the stock market looking good,
00:12:47.500 they'll stick with the liberals because it's a stable party. If the liberals stop making the economy
00:12:51.940 stable, they leave. And that is the issue that they're experiencing. Business liberals are leaving
00:12:57.420 and the green liberals are mad like Stephen Gilbeau and Nate Erskine-Smith. Carney, as I say a lot,
00:13:03.600 has perfectly triangulated away for everyone to hate his guts here.
00:13:09.660 Apologies. I had to come, I had to like pause the video and then come back because I realized I had the
00:13:14.460 wrong clip from the CBC later where they're talking about Mark Carney. It was the wrong guest who was
00:13:19.420 speaking and I can't find the right one. It doesn't matter. Actually, I can give them credit
00:13:23.180 though. The people who were speaking on the panel that I originally wanted to show,
00:13:27.980 that guy was actually saying that Carney's trying to tout the idea that he's like made gains on the
00:13:33.640 trade issue with the US. At the same time, like, no, you haven't. You know, you kind of have to have
00:13:39.480 a deal signed to be able to claim that you've had any progress. There's no such thing as like,
00:13:43.540 well, there's no deal, but we're getting there. Like when you've blown past every single date that
00:13:48.580 you've set yourself. So instead we are going to replace me making fun of the CBC with me making
00:13:54.080 fun of Laura Babcock, our favorite commentator from the left. Everything about her is just so
00:14:00.680 unhinged all the time. Like you wonder how there's nobody in her life who just says like, hey, Laura,
00:14:06.740 I agree with you, but tone it down like 90% of the way. But here she is to, I'll just let her say it.
00:14:17.140 Right? Like where I hate to do this at the end of the year, Canada, but I would be remiss in my
00:14:22.100 responsibilities, someone with a public voice, if I didn't tell you what I truly believe is
00:14:26.580 happening and what we need to do about it. Lead with courage and compassion. Don't let them divide
00:14:32.120 our country against ourselves. Support the leader who is trying to get us on a stronger footing in
00:14:37.480 this nightmare. And let's just try to grow up. Can we just focus on the fact that Canada is mere,
00:14:43.640 mere days from possible war, more war than we're already in, in this trade war, which Warren Buffett
00:14:49.520 said is a form of war. So we are already in this place. We can't deny it. We can't just look at our
00:14:54.940 phone and rabbit hole ourselves away from it because it sucks. We've got to deal with it. We
00:14:58.820 can do it with compassion, but we've got to have courage.
00:15:02.020 Yeah. So I know, no doubt you guys are all running out of the house right now to go watch the
00:15:07.360 O show. You can't even watch on your current devices. They're not good enough.
00:15:10.580 You need a new TV. You need a new computer, a new iPad, a new iPhone to go watch the O show on.
00:15:18.520 She has viewers, like not a lot of them, but there's a couple thousand people,
00:15:22.800 few thousand people who will watch every episode of like, and eat this stuff up. And like the
00:15:27.900 comments are all people being like, Oh my goodness, you and your guests are so right. Like we're,
00:15:32.660 we're days away from being in a war guys. What? Well, you know that Warren Buffett said a trade
00:15:38.960 war is a form of a war. I need to see the context on that. I honestly don't believe that that's
00:15:44.720 actually what that Warren Buffett said in context. I assume that he's probably talking about, you
00:15:50.120 know, sanctioning other, other countries and preventing them from like shipping. That's a
00:15:55.060 form of war. Yeah, that would be a form, you know, a blockade would be a form of war. He's probably
00:15:59.420 talking about like Venezuela and not letting them basically launder, uh, like oil into the American
00:16:05.780 economy, uh, that they've basically stolen from American oil and gas companies back in the day,
00:16:10.600 or they're talking about them preventing goods from getting out of Venezuela until they cut crack
00:16:16.120 down on all the fentanyl and Coke dealers and whatnot. Like goodness. But the thing is that you
00:16:21.820 have people out there who truly think like, no, we got to get behind Carney or else Trump will win.
00:16:26.540 It's like, well, what has Carney done to get us the win? That's the problem here is that,
00:16:33.240 and I've, I've heard this from a lot of people that you see liberals online saying they'll,
00:16:38.820 they will excuse the fact that Carney hasn't gotten anything done. Cause he's like, well,
00:16:42.480 he's not just going to sign any deal. He's only going to sign a deal that's good for Canada.
00:16:46.400 It's like, well, we're currently in a situation of having no deal, which is definitely not good for
00:16:51.960 us. But the problem is, is that the way they define a good deal for Canada effectively disallows
00:16:57.600 the Americans from winning too. Where if you're trying to sign a trade deal, you need a win-win
00:17:02.220 scenario. And that may require you to give in some concessions. You can make up for the concessions
00:17:07.960 that you have to give in other ways. Like if we get rid of supply management, we could find some way
00:17:13.060 of, you know, treating the farmers fairly who are, who are reliant on that system for so long and have
00:17:18.820 some sort of off ramp for them while bringing in more farmers into that system, into like a new
00:17:24.820 free market system. Cause right now we don't have a free market system. We can talk about that.
00:17:29.220 But the thing is that Carney defines winning based on giving up nothing and getting everything we
00:17:34.240 want, which means we will never get anything. It's delusional that this is how people think
00:17:39.720 about politics. It's, it's either the guy who's going to, you know, it's somehow right for him to
00:17:45.200 demand everything and concede nothing. We're Canada. I'm sorry, but we are just not a more powerful
00:17:51.700 country than the United States. And that's not unpatriotic to say, but I will assure you guys in the
00:17:57.460 coming and probably tomorrow, I am going to be making a video on the situation in British Columbia
00:18:03.300 politics right now. We will talk a little bit about the BC conservative leadership race.
00:18:08.080 One BC, we re-required one BC. Dallas Brody is absolutely right now in charge. We are going to
00:18:14.320 be moving forward with building party infrastructure and making this a serious viable party, more serious
00:18:20.300 than the BC conservatives, because guess what? All their riding associations are pretty much
00:18:24.780 not operating or have completely closed up shop because that party does not actually respect their
00:18:30.120 own riding associations. So we're going to create riding associations that we actually let do stuff.
00:18:35.620 But that's another story for another day. I'll probably do a video where I also go over the BC
00:18:39.500 polling because one BC has been doing quite well in the polls these days. And that's in spite of the
00:18:45.220 fact that we had effectively people trying to sabotage us. And even though the polling was done at the
00:18:51.500 time when we were in this kind of mini civil war, we were still getting seven, eight percent in the
00:18:56.580 polls, and we're going to keep expanding from there. But anyways, with all that being said,
00:19:01.760 thank you guys for watching, and I will see you all next time.