The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Trudeau destroyed Canada's national pride (34% ＂very proud＂ to be Canadian)

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. One of the most depressing aspects of Justin Trudeau and his

00:00:06.180 Liberal government's tenure in office has been the massive drop-off in Canadians' national pride.

00:00:12.920 Trudeau has been treating us like a post-national state and Canadians are starting to care about

00:00:18.020 Canada as if Canada is a post-national state. We don't really have a strong sense of identity

00:00:23.820 and there are way too many people in Canada who are only here for the economic opportunities and

00:00:28.940 as soon as those dry up, they'll go somewhere else. So I just want to take you through some

00:00:33.480 polls today and then I want to go over some of the recent things that Justin Trudeau has been saying

00:00:39.240 and doing to try and buoy his popularity in office. Spoiler alert, it's not working. But before I get

00:00:46.780 into that, I just want to remind you guys, if you're not yet a subscriber to this channel, make sure to

00:00:51.200 go and hit the subscribe button, hit the like button, leave a comment, and if you want to support our

00:00:55.120 legal fund, I have the GIFs and Go link in the description below as well as pinned at the top

00:01:00.080 of the comments. So here are the poll results from Angus Reid showing the fall in Canadians' national

00:01:06.800 pride over time. Let's start off actually with the other poll because this is just the raw number of

00:01:11.220 people saying that they are very proud to be Canadian. So back in 1985, 78% of people in Canada

00:01:19.060 would say they are very proud to be Canadian. I assume this is filtering out those who are not 1.00

00:01:23.380 actually citizens. In 1994, 71% said they were very proud to be Canadian. In 2003, 68% said they

00:01:31.880 were very proud to be Canadian. 2016, 52% said they were very proud to be Canadian. And in 2024,

00:01:39.580 we see the biggest drop off over the years of just 34% of people in Canada are very proud to be

00:01:46.840 Canadian. That is abysmal and depressing. We can actually take back the country though. We can 1.00

00:01:53.880 reverse this and make people proud to be Canadian again. And I hope we actually do, you know, put

00:01:58.520 our nose to the grindstone and make sure we reverse all the terrible liberal policies. But this is what

00:02:04.440 basically happens when you implement leftist policies in government. The country loses its sense

00:02:10.600 of identity because the left doesn't care about national pride or about the nation or its heritage

00:02:15.800 or anything like that. It just cares about collectivism around general identity groups.

00:02:21.600 The more general, the better because it's easier to divide Canadians along general lines of identity

00:02:27.760 rather than by very specific ones. And so right now, Canada is just a country of people who happen to

00:02:34.300 be here because they have a job here and they will move on if they don't have that job or if the

00:02:39.000 economic opportunities are better elsewhere. And this is what this poll found. So these are the

00:02:44.360 options right here in dark blue, light blue, light red, and dark red. Dark blue says, I have a deep

00:02:50.040 emotional attachment to Canada. I love the country and what it stands for. Blue, like lighter blue,

00:02:55.860 says I am attached to Canada, but only as long as it provides a good standard of living. Light red,

00:03:01.860 I am not attached to Canada. I would prefer to see the country split up into two or more smaller

00:03:06.260 countries. And dark red, I think Canada should join the United States. So in 1991, 65% people have a

00:03:14.100 deep emotional attachment to Canada. 19% like it well enough, but if there's no economic

00:03:19.220 opportunities, they're going to go somewhere else. 9% say that, you know, maybe it'd be better if we

00:03:23.460 broke up into smaller countries or whatnot. 5% say we should join the US. 2016, we only see a small drop

00:03:31.400 off and people saying they have a deep emotional attachment to Canada. And we see the rate of

00:03:35.740 people saying that they are, you know, I'm attached, but only as long as it provides a good standard of

00:03:40.500 living rise. That's probably more so reflecting that a lot of people undecided back in the day have

00:03:45.720 been pulled more accurately. And many joined that category. And in 2016, in fact, the people saying

00:03:51.820 they have no attachment and thinking that we should join the US actually went down. And this is right

00:03:57.660 after Justin Trudeau took office in 2015, as this poll was done in 2016. And I think everyone gave

00:04:03.280 Trudeau a chance when he first got in that, you know, he's going to be like all of our other prime

00:04:07.260 ministers, nationalistic, he has a different path, but he's not going to betray Canada. And now after

00:04:12.920 nine years of Justin Trudeau being in office, we only have 49% of people saying that they actually

00:04:19.640 have a deep emotional attachment to Canada. 37% say I'm attached to Canada, but only as long as it

00:04:25.620 provides a good standard of living. And then we see the not attached and thinking Canada should go

00:04:30.040 join the US have both jumped up. And it demonstrates that what Trudeau has done is made us feel

00:04:37.080 crushingly apathetic about our country, because our country is nothing more than just in jobs hub. We have

00:04:44.620 jobs here, we have economic opportunities. Sometimes it's mostly just becoming government jobs. And that's it. And

00:04:51.620 multiculturalism is a big issue here. Are people allowed to be from different backgrounds in Canada?

00:04:58.240 Obviously, you can have your own cultural institutions that you still love and enjoy. But the problem is with

00:05:04.160 multiculturalism is it has been replacing Canadian identity. Anyone can become a Canadian, but you have to want to 1.00

00:05:11.260 become a Canadian. And our mass immigration system has just brought people here who couldn't care less about being 1.00

00:05:17.400 Canadian. They just want to be here because jobs were here better here than in Punjab. Jobs were better 1.00

00:05:22.580 here than in the Philippines or better than in any other country. And people stick to their families, 1.00

00:05:28.420 stick to the neighborhoods of people that are from the same country as them. And that's it. And that is 0.99

00:05:34.040 what has turned Canada into a post national state. We have millions of people in this country who don't

00:05:40.080 really care to be here. And I think that that's why not only do we need to be slashing immigration, 0.97

00:05:44.620 I think that we should have a cap of 100,000. But we also need and that's for permanent residencies,

00:05:50.240 I think visas should be slashed for workers and students by 80%. But with the permanent residence, 1.00

00:05:55.860 we also need values tests on top of means and skill tests. Because if you don't care about Canada,

00:06:00.860 you don't know the history of Canada, don't show up. Because that's not adding any real value in the

00:06:06.860 long run to the country. Even if you're creating some economic value, if you don't care about the country at

00:06:12.780 all, it tends to break the country apart over time. That's it on that subject. It is depressing. So I don't

00:06:19.660 really want to talk about it too much. We can absolutely turn this around. We just have to want to turn it

00:06:24.700 around. But let's go into what Justin Trudeau has been doing recently. Because along with Canadians losing

00:06:30.900 their sense of national pride, Canadians also don't like Justin Trudeau still. So what's Justin Trudeau trying to do

00:06:38.080 to make us all like him again? Well, what's he doing to combat the rise in the popularity of pure

00:06:43.300 poly of the Conservatives? Mr. Speaker, this morning, the Bank of Canada announced interest rates are

00:06:48.780 going down yet again. Guys, tiny economic improvements. Yay. Yay. Interest rates are

00:06:56.780 slightly down. Yeah. Even though our economy does not actually recover that much. We are just reducing

00:07:02.820 interest rates in spite of the poor economic health of the country. That is terrible news for the leader

00:07:09.520 of the opposition. But it's great news for Canadians for whom things will become more affordable. On top

00:07:16.180 of that, a tax break. Actually, that doesn't make things more affordable. It only makes things more

00:07:22.160 affordable when the economy is healthy and then people can get cheaper loans and stuff. Yeah, it makes

00:07:28.040 technically loans cheaper, but also means there's far more easy money flowing through the economy,

00:07:34.000 like the $250 checks he's going to be sending people in April, which is just going to raise the

00:07:38.900 prices of things. It really doesn't help nearly as much as the liberals would like to think.

00:07:43.040 For Canadians over the next two months that the leader of the opposition voted against. Why,

00:07:49.140 Mr. Speaker? Because he cares more about his own political interests than he does about Canadians

00:07:55.060 who are struggling. Oh, he'll talk about the challenges Canadians are facing to try and

00:07:59.480 instrumentalize them for his own gain. But he won't lift a finger to help Canadians.

00:08:05.340 Justin Trudeau loves struggling Canadians so much that he's created millions more of them.

00:08:11.960 He thought, you know what? I like helping people who are struggling, but how do you help people who

00:08:17.620 are struggling if there's not enough struggling people to help? We have to make it so that there's even

00:08:22.180 more people who are struggling so I can pretend to help them. He hasn't helped. Whoops. Slight

00:08:29.240 technical difficulty there. If you saw the screen go a little bit fuzzy and then suddenly a cut is

00:08:35.240 because that happened. Gave me a good chance to grab a charger. But now let's move on to the next

00:08:40.700 video that the liberals have been posting to their social media. Again, I like to study what the liberals

00:08:46.400 are doing when it comes to their messaging because it reflects where they're at right now. What

00:08:51.780 confidence levels they have? Are they going to be able to come back? How is their polling in the long

00:08:56.980 run going to be looking? And the liberals haven't budged an inch when it comes to their messaging at

00:09:02.120 all. And it reflects where they're at in the polls. Low 20s, sometimes even falling below 20%.

00:09:08.140 They will remain stuck there because why vote for them? Why come back to the fold? There's no reason

00:09:15.720 like I'm a conservative. So obviously I was never going to vote liberal. But if you stuck me in as a

00:09:20.940 liberal advisor, not that I would do it, I could easily get them like another five to seven points

00:09:26.020 in the polls. And it's not because I'm super skilled. It's just, I'm not so gormlessly stupid.

00:09:31.360 I'd be telling the liberals to just keep talking about benefit programs, keep talking about handouts, 0.98

00:09:36.100 keep talking about the conservatives cutting things, even though people want things cut.

00:09:40.440 It's insane. We approach a federal election. Let me tell you one thing. Every program,

00:09:48.420 every initiative that I just talked about as being there to invest in Canadians,

00:09:54.780 to create things from childcare to school foods, to dental programs,

00:09:59.960 to draw in investments for battery plants, tire plants.

00:10:04.360 Oh my God. Okay. What does he mean by investment? He's the same guy who said he doesn't think of

00:10:11.300 monetary policy. So I assume he also doesn't know what an investment is. Government programs are not

00:10:17.800 an investment. There are some government spending you could say is an investment. I've been going on

00:10:23.540 this rant on X recently talking about how I hate when people hate airlines because airlines suck to 0.88

00:10:30.580 have to have to work with, but they suck because of governments, government taxes and fees and whatnot. 0.81

00:10:36.520 Like a good 15 to 20% of your airline ticket whenever you take a flight is government fees and taxes.

00:10:44.520 But the thing is like, it's legitimately like government investment. If they're building transportation

00:10:49.640 infrastructure, ports, roads, airports, which that's why I'm like, it's actually good economic

00:10:56.520 policy to actually make it cheaper to fly. So honestly, that would be one thing I'd be totally

00:11:01.860 fine with the government pooling tax dollars for is airports rather than having it be based on user

00:11:07.440 fees because everyone uses airports eventually. So we better just all pool the cost rather than it

00:11:13.260 being concentrated on the specific people who fly every year. But his idea of investments is like,

00:11:19.780 we have a program where we gave you money. That's not an investment. And a half the time,

00:11:24.460 it's not even giving people money. If anything, the $250 checks are a smarter form of the liberals

00:11:30.640 program because at least they're giving you cash you can do something with. They're not giving you

00:11:37.040 like bad programs in piecemeal that are going to cost you a massive amount of tax dollars

00:11:42.340 and that are hard to access. And then like, oh, we put money into battery plants and tire plants.

00:11:47.760 You mean subsidies? You mean a job that wouldn't exist unless we put forward subsidies? You mean

00:11:53.460 a fake job? That's what he's talking about. That's an investment. Is taxpayers paying for a job

00:11:59.380 that nobody wanted to exist in the actual market?

00:12:02.540 And critical minerals

00:12:04.000 to deliver a tax break for Canadians for the next few months.

00:12:09.880 Wow. 65% of Canadians don't like these programs. It's crazy how they keep trying to make fetch happen

00:12:24.880 on like the dental program and universal pharma care and then trying to attack Poly up because

00:12:30.260 he's cutting stuff. So here's their latest thing with the GST, HST tax holiday. We talked about this

00:12:37.920 in another video. Only 7% of Canadians said they were more likely or maybe it's 9% said they're

00:12:44.140 more likely to vote liberal because of the GST, HST tax holiday and the $250 checks. And if you know

00:12:50.440 how polling works, 9% basically means zero because it's a bunch of liberals who are probably just

00:12:55.980 hitting, yes, I'm more likely to vote liberal because of these programs because it looks good,

00:12:59.880 even though the vast majority of them who are saying more likely to vote liberal,

00:13:05.160 we're already a hundred percent likely to vote liberal. And I say the same thing for those who

00:13:09.280 said 13% said I'm less likely to vote liberal because of these programs. It's probably conservative

00:13:14.480 saying, well, I'm just gonna say I'm less likely anyways, because it looks bad for Trudeau, even

00:13:18.860 though they were 100% never going to vote for Trudeau in the first place. There's not that many people

00:13:23.720 who honestly answer those polls, which is why I don't like asking poll questions that way.

00:13:27.980 But here is the liberals big GST holiday attack out on Polyev.

00:13:32.980 This holiday season, one team is making life more affordable for you by delivering a holiday

00:13:38.720 tax break on the GST and HST. But not everyone believes in the magic of the holiday season.

00:13:44.920 The magic of the holiday season is Justin Trudeau putting out very poorly thought out tax holiday

00:13:52.740 policies, which only apply to certain items, only lasts for two months and has been a headache for

00:13:58.020 small businesses. Yes, that this is this is what people he doesn't like giving in the holiday season.

00:14:05.380 Pierre Polyev wants to cut the liberal tax break and leave Canadians out in the cold.

00:14:10.920 This isn't just a fight for more money in your pocket. It's a fight for your future.

00:14:16.420 I'm just gonna leave Canadians out in the cold because he doesn't like our stupid bloated programs. 0.99

00:14:21.860 Oh, are the liberals leaving people out in the cold because they won't cancel the carbon tax hike, 0.98

00:14:27.920 or they won't scrap the carbon tax in general, or they won't lower income taxes or corporate taxes?

00:14:33.140 No, no, no, it would actually be leaving Canadians in the cold to get rid of those taxes. But this HST,

00:14:38.920 GST thing, which might give Canadians back $5 on average during the entire time, that's, that's,

00:14:46.780 that's bringing Canadians into the, into the, into the house and putting them next to the hearth to 1.00

00:14:51.800 warm up. That's taking them out of the cold. You, the liberal team can be trusted to fight for you.

00:14:57.760 Oh my goodness, we're all gonna be, guys, I have to go text together, uh, five, four, two, two, two,

00:15:02.740 to together or together to that number because I'm so on board. I'm so, I'm so sold. I don't think I

00:15:09.220 could be any more sold than how sold I am right now. And here's even the video that the liberals just put

00:15:15.340 out today. Again, it's all so bloated. I know I always go through this stuff. I just like it.

00:15:20.200 It's so cloyingly obnoxious how the liberals try and like do messaging on these issues. It's so,

00:15:28.120 we're standing up for you. We're fighting the conservative cut. And like, you guys have,

00:15:33.160 I got basically a majority with the NDP. Stop pretending like the conservatives are a big

00:15:37.920 obstacle to you while you pass terrible policies.

00:15:41.320 while the leader of the opposition continues to talk down Canadians and the Canadian economy

00:15:46.100 and indeed Canada. Let me once again, put it on the record. Canada is the best country in the world.

00:15:53.520 And if we, as Canadians...

00:15:56.040 Dude, Canadians disagree with you now because of how badly you've managed the country.

00:16:00.300 We're stepping up, got us through the pandemic. Canadians got us through the challenge of high 0.96

00:16:05.880 inflation. Canadians will keep building a positive future for themselves by being there and showing

00:16:12.280 up for each other. Unlike the leader of the opposition... Oh, unlike him.

00:16:15.820 ...against every measure that has been put on the table... Oh, did he? 0.93

00:16:19.440 ...canadians over the past years and continues to be... What a son of a gun.

00:16:22.700 ...only for himself.

00:16:25.620 While the leader of the opposition continues to talk down...

00:16:28.660 I just like when they were clapping there. It just reminded me of that story about Stalin having

00:16:33.860 everyone clap for him for over three hours and then they executed the first person to stop clapping.

00:16:39.220 My goodness. It's so stupid. Everyone clap for Justin Trudeau. Man, what a... 1.00

00:16:45.620 I don't tend to like to use like really cutting insults. I'm just going to say that Justin Trudeau is

00:16:52.420 a complete goober. I don't understand. But guys, now we're going to end this video off with another 0.97

00:16:58.980 goober and I wanted to talk about his TikTok video because it was hilarious. This is brain death made

00:17:05.300 manifest. This guy has a problem with Pierre Polyev for extremely silly reasons. If you want to go follow 0.97

00:17:14.180 him, his name is Callum on Twitter here. I'll make this a little bit bigger so you can see it.

00:17:21.220 I think I have a photo saved of him. But yeah, he's one of our favorite... He's one of our favorite

00:17:27.220 TikTokers. This is his profile picture next to Steve Boots at Frank Dominic. I think Callum's one 0.96

00:17:33.220 of our favorites. And he has this new clip from one of his videos on his channel that gets maybe like

00:17:39.140 a hundred views per video. He says, Pierre stopped the crime Polyev is mad about Canada following

00:17:44.980 international war crime law. Okay. Let's, that's a, that's a good, that's a good thing to end on

00:17:50.980 right there. But let's check out his case and viewer discretion is advised. He does drop an F-bomb

00:17:56.980 at some point in this video. Recently, Pierre Polyev had the bright idea to completely undermine

00:18:03.220 international law as it pertains to the prime minister of Israel. Oh, how did Polyev undermine

00:18:08.900 international law? Benjamin Netanyahu, particularly that of the International Criminal Court,

00:18:15.060 who is seeking the arrest and subsequent trial of Netanyahu for apparent war crimes he sanctioned

00:18:21.540 in Palestine? Which ones? Which ones? He didn't. You mean they're fighting terrorists and they,

00:18:27.380 and they've had to fight terrorists and it's a war? That's not a war crime. Fighting,

00:18:31.620 have they indicted any of, like, have they indicted any other, like, dictators around the world?

00:18:37.460 Netanyahu's not a dictator. It's like, absolutely insane that people actually think that this is just,

00:18:43.060 well, the International Court said so. And this entire video is just, well, the International Court said so.

00:18:48.580 Who cares? They have no jurisdiction. It's a fake UN-created institution that nobody should be

00:18:55.060 stupid enough to participate in. And Justin Trudeau, in fact, is, like, attacking an ally by agreeing to 0.99

00:19:00.980 arrest the prime minister and, like, I think former defense minister for what? Because some civilians 0.91

00:19:07.380 died while they're fighting terrorists hiding behind civilians? How do you win a war if you're not

00:19:11.780 allowed to fire on terrorists if they decide to hide behind civilians? What was your reaction to

00:19:16.980 Justin Trudeau's reaction to the ICC decision and implying the prime minister of a democratic ally,

00:19:22.820 Israel, would be arrested if he stepped on Canadian soil? What did you think of that?

00:19:28.340 It just shows, once again, how extreme Justin Trudeau has become. Yeah. Recognizing international law,

00:19:37.140 so extreme. It legitimately is extreme to recognize international law. International law is left-wing

00:19:44.980 garbage. It is basically the UN exists just to give legitimacy to dictatorships and Islamists. That's 1.00

00:19:52.260 all it does. And so by recognizing the ICC, you're recognizing this woke board of people who only like

00:19:59.140 to go after Western countries. Like, I think they said, like, in the last decade or something like

00:20:03.460 that there's been, like, dozens of condemnations of Israel. And, like, how many of, like, North Korean

00:20:09.060 dictator Kim Jong-un? Like, one, I think. I thought this was the stop the crime guy. Stop the crime. No,

00:20:16.420 not like that. He wants to arrest the prime minister of Israel while he would not commit to the same for

00:20:25.860 the Ayatollah of Iran. Yeah, good point. Why wouldn't Justin Trudeau arrest the Ayatollah of Iran? 1.00

00:20:33.140 Oh, hey, I know. Maybe because the Ayatollah of Iran isn't wanted by the ICC. You stupid

00:20:41.060 fuck. Okay, so Ed from Ed and Eddie here thinks that this is such an own. Well, you know, the Ayatollah of 1.00

00:20:49.220 Iran is actually not wanted by the ICC. I'm not sure if you know this or not, Mr. Pollyup. It's

00:20:56.500 like, yeah, that's why the ICC is so stupid. Why don't they want the Ayatollah of Iran who, 1.00

00:21:03.460 his security forces in the IRGC when shooting, like, freedom protesters, their justification for 0.55

00:21:10.020 shooting them is saying, well, we're not aiming for the chest and head, we're aiming for the legs.

00:21:15.060 That, that's the person that the ICC doesn't put out warrants for. They don't put out the warrant. 0.95

00:21:19.780 They've never put out warrants for Bashar al-Assad during his entire time and, like, as the dictator

00:21:24.980 of Syria. They don't put out warrants for the arrest of tons of terrorists. They don't put out warrants for

00:21:29.300 the arrest of Kim Jong-un, Xi Jinping, any of these people, any of these, like, psychos. They don't have,

00:21:35.620 Erdogan doesn't have a warrant out for his arrest. So, oh, well, why, you see, they don't have a

00:21:43.380 warrant out for the Ayatollah. That's why Pierre Pollyup is deserving of being called stupid, 0.99

00:21:48.900 because Pierre Pollyup has moral consistency, not just this broken illogic where we just say, 0.98

00:21:56.100 well, he doesn't have a warrant out for his arrest. Pollyup, you're stupid. Got him. 1.00

00:22:01.700 Pierre Pollyup is literally asking why Justin Trudeau doesn't just make up his own international law.

00:22:09.140 Even if we did arrest the Ayatollah of Iran, it's not like we could hand him over to the ICC, 0.62

00:22:15.860 because, again, he's not wanted by the ICC, I guess.

00:22:21.060 I think that also, if we ever captured the Ayatollah of Iran, we'd be doing a disservice for

00:22:26.020 the world by putting him through the International Criminal Court. Better just shoot him. I would just 0.99

00:22:31.140 say dump him in the ocean. That would probably be better. The ICC has basically convicted nobody,

00:22:37.460 because it's, again, a court with zero jurisdiction. Every once in a while, they get some sort of

00:22:42.500 African war criminal out in the woods arrested, and they bring them to the ICC to pretend that 0.60

00:22:48.180 the ICC has legitimacy. But it doesn't at all. And so, I don't know why leftists think this is good

00:22:56.900 content. I've seen multiple people, left-wing accounts, sharing this video, thinking, like,

00:23:01.620 oh, this guy's cooking. This guy's absolutely rump-roasting Pierre Pollyup. It's like, why?

00:23:07.140 Because Pierre Pollyup knows an actual war criminal when he sees one and thinks the ICC is full of 1.00

00:23:12.020 idiots? I guess we could, like... 1.00

00:23:13.940 Also, what is he wearing here? Is he wearing his, like, mother's shawl? He looks like he's trying to

00:23:18.740 join Queen, but then gave up halfway through and just didn't end up going with the full outfit.

00:23:23.620 Take him as a prisoner of war? A war that would be started by arresting the Ayatollah of Iran? 0.72

00:23:31.300 What the actual fuck? What is Pierre proposing here? 1.00

00:23:34.820 It's another...

00:23:36.020 He's just saying that if you were to actually arrest a war criminal,

00:23:39.220 you should try and actually arrest a war criminal, not a prime minister fighting a terrorist group.

00:23:44.260 He's like, what, is he trying to, uh, was he trying to start a war with Iran?

00:23:49.860 Well, he wants to start a war with Iran to arrest the Ayatollah? When has he said that?

00:23:54.580 When has he said that at all?

00:23:55.860 An example of how radical Justin Trudeau is, how this extreme woke agenda, it permeates everything he does.

00:24:05.380 Ah, yes. Another example of how woke means absolutely nothing. Woke is when you won't

00:24:12.340 arrest a world leader without legal precedent to do so.

00:24:15.780 It actually is woke to want to arrest Benjamin Netanyahu. Because the idea is that the West

00:24:22.980 and anyone who is, like, proud of Western values, Judeo-Christian values, that that is actually very

00:24:30.260 bad and terrible. And capitalism is oppressive. And because Israel is rich and democratic and Western,

00:24:38.420 and Gaza is a crap hole, that means that the Israelis must be oppressing the Palestinians in Gaza, 0.98

00:24:46.020 even though they were given that territory in 2005 and immediately elected a terrorist group 0.99

00:24:50.500 who killed the slightly more moderate terrorist group that was given the, uh, organization,

00:24:54.740 that was given the area to interim basically manage and then start firing rockets into Israel.

00:25:00.260 That's actual wokeness. The idea that Benjamin Netanyahu is really the real criminal in all of this.

00:25:07.540 He's the criminal for fighting Hamas and having a civilian to terror militant death ratio that's 0.56

00:25:15.140 unmatched in any war. World War II, mostly civilians died. World War I, I think, is like the one war

00:25:21.460 that mostly civilians didn't die in, but it's just because everything was stalemated out in the middle

00:25:25.700 of nowhere with a bunch of soldiers. But for the most part, every single war throughout history

00:25:30.180 is mostly civilians dying, because civilians don't have, you know, arms and armor to protect

00:25:35.380 themselves. They don't know where they're going or what they're doing. They're not barricaded in

00:25:39.300 trenches. And Israel, even though they are fighting people who hide behind women and children, 0.64

00:25:44.900 have somehow come out with just a one-to-one ratio. Oh, it's a genocide, Wyatt. It's a genocide.

00:25:50.740 How they've literally had more people born in the Gaza Strip during this time than people have died.

00:25:55.700 It's not. It is the worst genocide that I've ever seen in my entire life, if this is an Israeli 1.00

00:26:01.380 genocide versus the Palestinian people. I've been to Israel. I've talked to Palestinians who live in

00:26:06.820 the Israeli territories. They like it way better than living in the West Bank, because they say that 0.97

00:26:11.460 the West Bank is full of criminals and Islamists. And so even though these are Muslim Palestinians, 1.00

00:26:17.380 they like living in their own Muslim communities in Israel rather than living in the Palestinian 0.96

00:26:23.700 Authority or Hamas controlled areas. They even were happy when Israel built a wall 0.94

00:26:29.300 around their area because they were right up against where the West Bank started. So they liked

00:26:33.700 that the Israeli government built a wall so that criminals would stop crossing over the fence that

00:26:39.780 used to be there to come and steal their property. Anyways, that's it for me today, guys. Again,

00:26:47.140 subscribe to the channel if you want, like this video, leave a comment. And if you want to support

00:26:51.460 the legal fund, we have this billionaire Chinese developer suing me for defamation. Defamation that

00:26:56.820 in over three years, he hasn't actually provided a shred of evidence for, but he's just been dragging

00:27:01.540 this case out. It's what we call lawfare, simply using the process as the punishment and trying

00:27:07.300 to extract apologies or other sorts of things from people who didn't do anything wrong to you

00:27:12.020 in order to make yourself feel powerful. I paid more than $34,000 into fighting this case,

00:27:16.820 so anything you can give at least helps reduce the amount of legal stress I'm under. You know,

00:27:22.660 I'm going to survive. Don't feel like you got to run over to your wallet or whatever and like

00:27:26.420 pitch out money. If you can't, obviously don't do that. I will live on. But it does help,

00:27:30.740 obviously make sure that I'm having to put a little bit less of my own money into making

00:27:35.140 sure that I can pay for my lawyers who've been doing a great job, by the way. It's been over a

00:27:39.940 year since the guy suing me had his deposition and we asked him for an undertaking. An undertaking is

00:27:47.060 when in a deposition, you're asking for extra information. Can you get me this? Can you get me

00:27:51.700 that? And we asked him, did you ever sue the Globe and Mail? Because everything we said about this guy,

00:27:56.500 everything our guest writer said about this guy in our article was pretty much based off of a

00:28:01.540 Globe and Mail investigative article by Robert Fyfe and Stephen Chase. The only thing that we then

00:28:06.340 added was the fact that he and many others were basically maxing out donations to Aaron O'Toole's

00:28:12.580 2020 legal, sorry, leadership campaign. And then we just cited, here's all the connections he has,

00:28:18.900 and then linked to the Globe and Mail article. And that was considered defamation. But it's probably

00:28:24.740 true that he never sued the Globe and Mail, but he sued us, which you can't do. You can't

00:28:29.540 sue somebody for citing an article from a year and a half ago that you didn't raise a legal stink about

00:28:34.660 at the time, even though you had the means and resources to fight it, but you probably sized it

00:28:39.380 up and realized you would never be able to beat the Globe and Mail, but you thought you could beat a 22

00:28:43.380 year old. I was 22 at the time that this started. And so far, I have been able to fight back and keep

00:28:48.500 myself afloat. But anyways, thank you for listening to my rambling, guys. Love y'all. See you guys later.

00:28:54.340 I'll see you guys later.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - December 13, 2024

Trudeau destroyed Canada's national pride (34% ＂very proud＂ to be Canadian)

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript