The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - Trudeau ROASTED by Poilievre in heated Question Period exchange!

00:00:00.000 Hey guys, Wyatt Claypool here. I rarely talk about what goes on in question period in Canada

00:00:06.280 because I find most of the time question period in our House of Commons is just politicians

00:00:12.220 repeating talking points at each other and not really interacting. Plus, there's that old joke

00:00:17.600 that, well, you know, they don't call it answer period for a reason because the government never

00:00:22.160 actually answers any questions from an opposition MP. But today, we actually had a blockbuster

00:00:28.800 question period. To imitate the character Stefan from SNL for a second, it has everything.

00:00:35.520 Polyev making fun of Jagmeet Singh. Polyev making fun of Justin Trudeau telling him to calm down.

00:00:40.820 Justin Trudeau having a meltdown. It has everything. It's hilarious. I want to show it to you in just

00:00:45.640 a second. But first, I'm going to remind you, if you're not currently a subscriber, go down and hit

00:00:50.640 the subscribe button, like this video, leave a comment if you want to. And if you want to support

00:00:54.920 the show, you can donate to the Give, Send, Go legal fund, both into the description below

00:00:59.220 and pinned at the top of the comments. Now, without further ado, here's how, like, this is just a

00:01:05.320 section I'm going to show you. It was exciting all the way through, but I'm going to mostly stick to

00:01:08.840 all the English stuff leading up to Justin Trudeau having a meltdown and Polyev telling him to calm

00:01:13.520 down. The Honorable Leader of the Opposition. No sense, Mr. Speaker. I couldn't agree more.

00:01:21.200 Here we have the NDP claiming to have torn up their deal, their carbon tax coalition with the

00:01:26.960 Prime Minister. But then they... The context of this is that the previous question was asked by an NDP

00:01:33.360 MP, which was extremely hypocritical because they were asking the liberals to do something that the

00:01:39.260 NDP have the power to force them to do. And if they're unwilling, they could dissolve this government

00:01:43.200 and basically going after them for being deeply unserious.

00:01:46.500 He taped it back together when he promised a two-month tax trip. Then after taking credit for it,

00:01:54.100 the NDP says they didn't know what was in it. And now they're opposed to it. Mr. Speaker,

00:02:00.260 these two leaders can't even figure out how to give away $6 billion properly. Isn't it time for a

00:02:07.700 carbon tax election so that we can elect a common sense government?

00:02:14.020 And now here is really where it starts. Justin Trudeau is about to go from a 3 out of 10 on the

00:02:20.200 agitation scale all the way up to an 11 out of 10 by the time that this is over.

00:02:26.300 The Right Honorable Prime Minister.

00:02:28.420 Mr. Speaker, MPs are supposed to represent their constituents here in Ottawa. But the Conservative Party

00:02:35.100 MPs are choosing to represent their leader back in their constituency. I know Canadians across the

00:02:42.040 country, including in Conservative ridings, are looking forward to saying no taxes on meals in

00:02:48.100 restaurants or on all groceries or on kids' clothes for the next few months. But the leader is making

00:02:54.120 them vote against these measures to help Canadians. If Conservative MPs want to stand up for Canadians,

00:03:00.700 they need to stand up against their leader.

00:03:02.780 None of the Conservatives are against tax relief. The reason why they are going to vote as a party

00:03:09.660 against these measures is because they're not permanent or it's not getting rid of the carbon

00:03:13.660 tax. Justin Trudeau doesn't care about tax relief. He's only removing the HST and GST for two months

00:03:19.640 and then giving people $250 in April if you're making under $150,000, which also doesn't apply to

00:03:25.800 retired seniors, which is really silly. So what Trudeau is really doing is giving people fake tax 0.98

00:03:31.900 relief. Economists even show very short tax relief measures like this do not actually spur the economy

00:03:39.200 at all because people know it's about to end and they just hold on to the money.

00:03:46.640 The Honorable Leader of the Opposition.

00:03:49.260 Well, Mr. Speaker, I think Canadians are ready to stand up and speak for themselves.

00:03:55.500 If the Prime Minister wants to lecture us about democracy, then why don't we have a referendum?

00:04:01.860 A referendum election where the choice will be the following.

00:04:05.940 A tiny two-month tax trick with the NDP Liberals or a permanent axing of the carbon tax

00:04:17.600 and axing the sales tax on new homes. Why not let Canadians decide now?

00:04:25.500 I hate the stupid talking point that he puts out on this. Like, he says it so often, there's almost 1.00

00:04:43.680 not even, there's no point in me even debunking it. You guys all know that it's not actually giving you

00:04:49.320 back more money than you're paying into it. There's no such thing as a magic box that the

00:04:53.600 Prime Minister has where you can take your billions of dollars in tax revenue and then give you somehow

00:04:59.140 more back. Even if they are not giving it to large corporations and to richer people, there is still

00:05:06.700 more money being spent at the CRA administering this program that would make it impossible to give

00:05:12.720 people more money back than they were paying in. Only if you only take the cost of your home heating

00:05:17.640 and your gasoline and a couple other things, can you say that you're getting a little bit more back.

00:05:22.800 And when I say a little bit more back, like 50 bucks, and that's not even taking into account a lot

00:05:27.840 of other products and services that the carbon tax has moved the price up of, which would easily wipe

00:05:33.240 out your 50 bucks in a quarter. But, you know, I'll like Justin Trudeau, keep going on that. That one just

00:05:38.500 picks me off so much because it is preying on people's, effectively, their sense of immediacy.

00:05:45.700 They see the money that gets taken from them in the carbon tax is taken over time, but they're given

00:05:50.700 the carbon tax rebate all at once in each quarter, which makes it seem like a lot of money, even if

00:05:56.080 you were nickel and dimed way more than you got back in the carbon tax.

00:05:59.580 People's homes four times a year and delivers more money to middle-class Canadians than the price on

00:06:06.040 pollution actually costs, while at the same time decreasing emissions. And in regards to housing,

00:06:11.620 his failed housing proposal was to cut billions of dollars from cities across this country that

00:06:19.840 they're investing in building housing. That's not his housing proposal. His housing proposal is that

00:06:24.820 the money you're spending is going nowhere and just being burned up in regulations and increased

00:06:29.960 federal oversight on building. So you can get rid of it, save taxpayers a bunch of money,

00:06:34.980 money, and then just tell basically municipalities without destroying zoning laws to just make it

00:06:40.000 easier to get each individual building like approved faster.

00:06:43.620 But property taxes for homeowners, that would make it harder to build homes. He has a proposal

00:06:49.460 that is electorally interesting for him, but won't do anything for Canadians.

00:06:53.780 Electorally interesting. That's his condescending way of saying Canadians actually like my plan.

00:07:09.800 That was a perfect way of putting that too, exactly what I'm thinking. And I don't preview these. I knew

00:07:13.860 what the kind of the direction that this clip was going to go in, but it's a really good follow up to

00:07:18.100 comment on the fact that, yeah, you're saying it's electorally interesting because it's popular.

00:07:23.700 Electorally interesting means that your plan isn't popular and mine is.

00:07:27.280 Because Canadians have figured out that after nine years of this weak prime minister,

00:07:33.600 weak, spending $80 billion on housing, with the result being the doubling of housing costs,

00:07:42.360 that spending billions more won't make any difference. We're going to slash that bureaucracy

00:07:47.360 and use the savings to ax the sales tax on Canadian homes. Why won't he let Canadians decide?

00:07:57.280 And that actually is a really good plan because it doesn't matter how much the government pours in

00:08:01.780 to trying to create more of something. The problem with trying to create housing by the government just

00:08:07.280 feeding in more cash into a bloated bureaucratic system is that the bureaucracy then grows and then

00:08:13.340 eats up the money that you throw in. This is what happened with the stimulus that Obama had passed

00:08:17.840 in 2009 when he became the US president. To get out of the 2008 market crash, he dumped a bunch of

00:08:24.220 money into creating shovel-ready jobs. And then because to get the money, counties and municipalities

00:08:29.880 had to basically sign on with the federal government to follow certain codes and environmental regulations.

00:08:37.060 All the money got destroyed through following the regulations to get the money. It was completely

00:08:42.300 worthless. And that's what happened with the housing accelerator fund.

00:08:45.460 The right Honourable Prime Minister.

00:08:49.120 Mayors from Kelowna, Abbotsford, Uclua and all in Conservative ridings across the country are speaking

00:08:55.900 up that the investments we're making in the housing accelerator is helping them cut red tape,

00:09:01.800 increase densification, create more homes more quickly. And the plan the Conservative Party has put

00:09:07.860 forward to remove those billions of dollars from municipalities just as they're tackling the

00:09:13.600 housing crisis would harm Canadians. But the leader of the opposition doesn't care about harming

00:09:18.200 Canadians. What he wants to do is gain power. He'll do anything he can to do that. While we stay

00:09:23.380 focused on Canadians, he's focused on himself. 1.00

00:09:27.380 It's such a stupid talking point because aren't you trying to hold on to power at like all costs? 1.00

00:09:32.160 He doesn't have a majority government. It's not like saying, hey, people elected us to a majority. 1.00

00:09:35.920 Of course we don't want an election. People elect us to a four-year term. Yes, technically every election

00:09:40.860 is the people electing you to a four-year term. But he has a currently a government that's barely

00:09:45.840 being held up by the NDP and only being held up by the fact the NDP is bankrupt and really nothing more.

00:09:53.980 The Honourable Leader of the Opposition.

00:09:55.840 Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has run a groundbreaking experiment. He's put billions of dollars in a sack

00:10:04.620 and offered it to politicians. And the finding? They're willing to accept the money. Incredible.

00:10:12.800 Groundbreaking sociological study. He wants to give more money to local politicians who block home building.

00:10:20.240 We want to use the same money to cut taxes for the people who buy homes and build homes.

00:10:26.600 Why won't we allow Canadians to decide whether they want the money to go to the politicians 0.85

00:10:31.660 or to the people in a carbon tax election?

00:10:35.480 I'm just kind of commentating along with how effective this is as we go. Like,

00:10:39.140 the thing that's so good about this question period clip, or I guess just the whole thing in general,

00:10:44.800 is that Polioff's funny. That's the one thing that most politicians suck at, 0.98

00:10:49.800 yet delivering really high-quality information while being fun and quippy. That's the thing. 0.54

00:10:55.100 Actually, I have started kind of, not souring in any way,

00:10:58.400 I started getting kind of bored by some of the stuff Polioff was doing in question period over

00:11:03.440 the last couple of months, maybe more like three or four months, because it became a little bit too

00:11:07.460 much ax the tax, do this to that, you know, verb the noun kind of stuff. He's way better when he kind

00:11:13.940 of freewheeling like this. And you can guarantee that there wasn't a script for this because they

00:11:18.120 are truly just trading blows back and forth here, although Justin Trudeau is really not getting any

00:11:24.060 good jabs in. Sorry, I do really like the rather pronunciation there.

00:11:39.200 Actually deliver for Canadians. We know, as we saw during the pandemic, as we've seen

00:11:43.960 through the inflation challenges, working together with the provinces, working together

00:11:48.880 with municipalities to get things built for Canadians is what they want. What does the leader

00:11:53.780 of the opposition do? He insults people. But then he also votes against direct money

00:11:59.220 in Canadians' pockets, whether it's with investments in child care or dental care,

00:12:04.080 whether it's investments in taking the tax off of groceries for the next few months.

00:12:09.400 These are things that he's... Well, it's not even a few months, it's a couple of months,

00:12:12.740 Justin. And all this is just more fear mongering of cuts. Cuts are actually very popular today.

00:12:18.460 62% of Canadians want cuts to spending, because eventually, even though we are in a country where

00:12:24.160 it's normal to always think that, oh, we should put more money into that program. Oh, of course we

00:12:29.100 should spend more money on poverty programs. Oh, of course we should spend more money upgrading

00:12:33.800 our infrastructure and doing this or that. These days, the spending is so silly and so bloated, 0.93

00:12:39.380 the vast majority of Canadians will say, yes, cut it. And that's 62% with a margin of people saying, 0.87

00:12:45.460 I don't know. And they're probably going to break in the direction of, please cut stuff.

00:12:49.540 Standing against, out of political self-interest.

00:12:54.520 The Honorable Leader of the Opposition.

00:12:57.000 Just shows how out of control he's become. He can't stay on a subject.

00:13:00.460 He brings up housing, so I agree. I just threw away my script and said, let's debate housing.

00:13:06.100 So he now changes the subject back to his two-month tax trick. Well, here's the trick,

00:13:11.760 everyone. After the tax break runs out in February, they're going to hike the carbon tax on heat,

00:13:19.940 housing, gas, and groceries, all as a part of a plan to quadruple the carbon tax to 61 cents a liter.

00:13:28.840 So will he get himself under control, show some strength for a change, and call a carbon tax

00:13:34.460 election?

00:13:34.880 Again, just to say this, you could easily clip all of this for an ad. The Conservatives could

00:13:47.780 easily make a federal ad just based on cutting between Justin Trudeau and Pierre Polyev here.

00:13:53.400 I would just dump money showing this to people, because I think most Canadians who don't watch this

00:13:58.340 would be blown away that the Prime Minister is legitimately this bad at articulating themselves,

00:14:02.720 and Pierre Polyev is this good at cornering him.

00:14:06.120 The Prime Minister.

00:14:07.140 I figure every day I get up in this house, I talk about one thing and one thing only.

00:14:11.100 Canadians.

00:14:12.180 Canadians. No, I talk about one thing and one thing only. Obfuscations.

00:14:16.580 And how we're there to help Canadians. How we're there to grow a stronger economy for Canadians,

00:14:23.600 with direct investments that will support them, with free insulin, with dental care,

00:14:28.580 with more spaces in child care, all things that the leader of the opposition is voting against.

00:14:33.680 Yes, we're investing in the most ambitious housing solution that this country has ever seen.

00:14:39.280 Things that he didn't do when he was Stephen Harper's failed housing minister.

00:14:42.960 How much did housing cost back when Pierre Polyev was the housing minister?

00:14:48.200 A lot less. And not like a lot less by inflationary standards, like a lot less by like real GDP standards.

00:14:56.420 We're going to stand up and fight for Canadians while the leader of the opposition gets up,

00:15:00.160 pulls off his little performances, and fights against me.

00:15:04.680 The Honorable Leader of the Opposition.

00:15:06.660 He said he was going to talk about one thing, and then he rambled on about 10 or 15 things,

00:15:16.160 all things he hallucinates that one day he might do,

00:15:19.980 if only he were given another nine years in office, Mr. Speaker.

00:15:24.260 Instead of talking about his real record, which is that he doubled housing costs,

00:15:29.040 he doubled food bank use, he doubled the debt,

00:15:32.440 and now he wants to quadruple the carbon tax to 61 cents a liter.

00:15:38.700 Mr. Speaker, we need a prime minister who's in control of himself,

00:15:42.780 so why doesn't he call a carbon tax election so we can get one?

00:15:47.560 I'll play a little bit more of this, but this is almost where, you know,

00:15:50.680 he just checkmate Justin Trudeau.

00:15:52.880 That was, again, why I consider this blockbuster.

00:15:56.440 That was actually interesting, which is so different from the normal Canadian parliamentary operating standards,

00:16:03.820 especially in question period, where it's just seeing people say,

00:16:06.860 you guys aren't doing a good job, and then Christy Freeland gets up and say,

00:16:10.000 Canadians know that we're looking out for them by burning their tax dollars and taxing them more, or whatever.

00:16:18.080 This is great.

00:16:19.460 I won't even, I'm actually, I'd be shocked if Justin Trudeau actually answered this one back,

00:16:24.980 because I have not watched past this.

00:16:29.460 The right honorable prime minister.

00:16:31.960 I give him credit for even trying to come back from that one.

00:16:34.800 I'll say it again.

00:16:35.720 The Canada carbon rebate puts more money.

00:16:38.320 Oh my goodness, he's going back to factory settings,

00:16:40.780 and he's just talking about the rebate again.

00:16:42.560 In the pockets of eight out of ten Canadians.

00:16:44.240 But the leader opposite wants to talk about one thing.

00:16:47.300 He talks about food banks.

00:16:48.440 Let's talk about the school food program.

00:16:50.940 This is a program that sends federal dollars directly into school boards.

00:16:55.920 Why are people having to use food banks more than ever when you're a prime minister?

00:17:00.820 I don't care about giving kids free meals if we could just reverse a bunch of your other policies,

00:17:06.880 and the parents could give them whatever they want for lunch. 1.00

00:17:10.640 That's the stupid thing. 1.00

00:17:11.700 He's basically impoverishing you, and then trying to then paternalize your family by saying, 1.00

00:17:17.860 let me pay for your kids' lunch. 0.99

00:17:19.900 I know that you can't handle paying for your kids' lunch because I've broken your knees economically,

00:17:24.380 but I'm here to be such a nice guy and feed your children.

00:17:28.560 Like, Justin Trudeau is just a, you know, so-and-so, you know, one of those soft words.

00:17:34.140 Directly to support delivering good food programs for kids.

00:17:40.300 No bureaucracy, just investments in school food programs.

00:17:44.160 Which requires bureaucracy.

00:17:47.100 Requires a lot of it, actually.

00:17:48.940 Think about how many school systems you have to interact with,

00:17:51.800 and then how many outside companies to be able to acquire the food, make the food,

00:17:57.580 have outlines for who gets what food because people have dietary restrictions.

00:18:02.080 It's almost like we could just cut Canadians' taxes, and they could pay for their own kids' food.

00:18:06.880 And then they can do all the bureaucratic stuff themselves.

00:18:10.280 They don't have, they know if their kid can't eat peanut butter, for instance.

00:18:13.880 The Conservative leader voted against it, and worse, he forced his own MPs to vote against it,

00:18:19.800 to stand up against their constituents and side with him instead of in Canadians who need help.

00:18:25.240 I can do that in there.

00:18:28.720 Oh, yeah, Pierre Polyev's forcing his MPs to not, to stand against their own constituents.

00:18:35.340 What do their constituents think again on these issues?

00:18:38.180 Oh, yeah, they're very conservative.

00:18:40.940 Only 17% of people with undecideds removed, in the latest Main Street research poll,

00:18:47.520 were going to vote for the Liberals.

00:18:49.460 47%, 30% more were going to vote for the Conservatives.

00:18:52.080 But, yeah, Pierre Polyev is just standing in the way of his own MPs from serving their constituents. 0.99

00:18:59.180 This is pathetic. 0.99

00:19:00.440 This is a government on its last legs. 1.00

00:19:03.420 They have nothing.

00:19:04.580 They have absolutely nothing.

00:19:06.300 And I don't even think Jagmeet Singh was there.

00:19:08.140 I want to see what Jagmeet Singh was doing.

00:19:09.760 Bear with me for a second.

00:19:10.880 But if you're this far into a video with me,

00:19:13.880 then I guess I can go see if Jagmeet Singh's doing anything slightly useful.

00:19:17.540 By the way, there is a no-confidence motion in the tomorrow being put forward.

00:19:28.440 Who's going to think that we're going to see Jagmeet Singh vote for the no-confidence motion

00:19:33.960 and get rid of Justin Trudeau?

00:19:35.360 Any guesses?

00:19:36.380 Any bets?

00:19:37.360 That would be the easiest money ever.

00:19:39.060 If I used any betting apps or, you know, gambling, I gambled at all,

00:19:44.220 I would just put money every single day on Jagmeet Singh not collapsing the government.

00:19:49.760 Obviously, not very many people would be voting on the other side of that.

00:19:52.760 But whoever it would be would just be giving me their money at that point.

00:19:56.140 But here's Jagmeet Singh in a recent, like, I guess, I don't even know.

00:20:02.640 These pressers?

00:20:03.660 I don't even know where he is.

00:20:05.380 He looks like he's at, like, a roller disco or a laser tag facility.

00:20:10.800 We're letting them know right now.

00:20:12.340 We're letting it be very clear.

00:20:13.640 My expectation is let's pass the GST holiday right now separately and then fix the checks.

00:20:19.940 And when I mean fix the checks, I want to see a fix that includes seniors, 1.00

00:20:24.200 people living with disabilities, and those that weren't able to work.

00:20:27.260 Okay.

00:20:27.660 Now he's trying to patch holes in what he previously did,

00:20:30.500 which doesn't shock me with Jagmeet Singh.

00:20:32.120 So here probably have alluded to this at the beginning of that clip. 0.93

00:20:35.380 Jagmeet Singh signed on to the stupid GST holiday and the April checks and then quickly had to backpedal when he realized that the GST holiday wasn't going to come until in the near end of holiday shopping, of Christmas shopping. 0.92

00:20:50.680 And then he also didn't know that, yeah, people with disabilities who aren't working and retired seniors don't get the $250. 0.97

00:20:57.520 But for some reason, we're giving $250 to people who are making up $250,000 who I know can be economically struggling.

00:21:04.940 But you wouldn't think you'd be giving it to someone with that much money.

00:21:08.860 You'd think you'd be giving it to everyone making, like, $100,000 or less,

00:21:13.680 and then you could actually give some to seniors and people with disabilities.

00:21:17.000 So now Jagmeet Singh's trying to backpedal.

00:21:19.560 And what I also have to mention about this clip that I just showed you, he's so low energy.

00:21:24.980 That's the big contrast between good opposition with pure Polyev and bad opposition with Jagmeet Singh.

00:21:31.800 Really, his only opposition to Justin Trudeau at this point is wanting to move back the GST holiday date and give some more people onto these checks.

00:21:40.560 How about you push for real tax reform?

00:21:42.560 How about you push for spending reform?

00:21:43.940 Oh, wait, it's the NDP.

00:21:46.000 They don't care about those things because they think that collecting tax revenue is an inherent moral good.

00:21:53.880 The more dollar signs that the government collects, the better it is.

00:21:59.900 He doesn't care if people then go bankrupt.

00:22:02.260 He just wants the government to have more money.

00:22:04.920 He doesn't care about poor people doing better.

00:22:08.120 He just cares that rich people don't do as well because Jagmeet Singh is really just a, I guess, malcontent is a great way of putting it.

00:22:16.900 And it is prompting me to have to play, once again, the Margaret Thatcher clip of her owning a Labour MP at the end of her tenure,

00:22:24.640 pointing out that they don't actually like poor people.

00:22:27.300 They just hate the rich people.

00:22:28.020 What the Honourable Member is saying is that he would rather the poor were poorer, provided the rich were less rich.

00:22:37.620 That way you will never create the wealth for better social services as we have.

00:22:43.140 And what a policy.

00:22:44.860 Yes, he would rather have the poor poorer, provided the rich were less rich.

00:22:49.880 That is a Liberal policy.

00:22:51.980 Yes, it came out.

00:22:53.260 He didn't intend it to.

00:22:55.880 What's the Honourable Member...

00:22:57.480 Almost played that again.

00:22:59.360 Wasn't she great?

00:23:00.280 I wish more people were like that.

00:23:01.800 Kemi Badenoch at least looks really good as the Tories' leader in the UK right now,

00:23:07.180 actually willing to deport people, send migrants back, 1.00

00:23:09.900 basically have, like, a sea security system to prevent migrant boats to come into the UK.

00:23:16.120 Really good stuff there.

00:23:17.020 I hope she sticks to it and doesn't do whatever a UK Tory leader does and eventually super softens 0.98

00:23:22.880 and then just ends up serving a lot of big business interests who want more warm bodies in the country. 0.98

00:23:28.200 And it's not even, like, big business interests.

00:23:29.780 It's, like, big subsidized businesses.

00:23:32.100 Real businesses that are operating in the free market don't want just more random people in the country

00:23:38.420 who are committing crimes and changing the culture of the country.

00:23:42.520 The UK is insane these days.

00:23:43.860 They have independent MPs being easily elected in certain areas because the population is,

00:23:49.720 let's just be very clear here, Islamist, and they will vote for whoever hates Israel the most and likes Hamas. 0.80

00:23:56.180 It's nuts what's happening in the UK at this point.

00:23:58.980 Anyways, that should be it for me today, guys.

00:24:02.040 That was a great time in Question Period we had.

00:24:04.860 I'm probably not going to return to talking about Question Period for a while,

00:24:08.420 although I might talk about Kevin Vong asking Justin Trudeau a question in this same session of Question Period

00:24:14.560 because Trudeau gets really petty at Kevin Vong just pointing out some failures of his on the border

00:24:20.740 that's leading to Donald Trump threatening to tariff us.

00:24:23.540 And I think Kevin Vong needs more attention as easily one of the best MPs currently in our House of Commons.

00:24:30.600 Anyways, that's it for me today, guys.

00:24:32.480 Remember, like, share, and subscribe.

00:24:34.280 Donate to the GIFs and Go if you can, and sign up on my website, wyattclaybool.com,

00:24:39.800 if you want nomination and leadership recommendations around the country.

00:24:43.980 Have a good one.

00:24:44.500 Thank you.

The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - November 27, 2024

Trudeau ROASTED by Poilievre in heated Question Period exchange!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript