The National Telegraph - Wyatt Claypool - June 25, 2024


Trudeau's Liberals prove how little they care for Canadians

Hosted by
Mentioned
Pierre Poilievre wants immigration "much lower" (No Mass Immigration) David Eby's NDP is slowing while BC Conservative speed up

Episode Stats


Length

8 minutes

Words per minute

186.2

Word count

1,625

Sentence count

70

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I discuss how the Liberals are trying to silence anyone who wants to talk to them about pro-life issues. I also talk about the by-election in Toronto St. Paul between the Liberals and Tories, and the abortion issue.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 I do enjoy a good old-fashioned political cell phone, and the Liberals are full of them these
00:00:05.980 days. They'll post a criticism of the Conservatives at the same time that it ends up just exposing
00:00:11.980 how little they care for the average Canadian. This one is a perfect example. The Liberals
00:00:17.740 went after the Conservatives because they took phone calls from people that the Liberals say
00:00:22.700 are Freedom Convoy organizers. They're not actually. There were people who did that
00:00:26.140 organizing for the slow roll of motorcycles through Ottawa that happened a few months later,
00:00:30.700 but they're attacking Conservatives because their MPs actually take calls from their constituents.
00:00:37.820 Yes, that is a big rip on the Conservatives, that their people actually attend to their local
00:00:43.420 residents and take calls from them, hear their concerns, as the Liberals should. Apparently,
00:00:48.640 if you want to talk to a Liberal MP, one, you got to bribe them first, and then two, they have to
00:00:54.220 already like everything that you're going to say, and just sit down for tea and talk about how much
00:00:58.860 you like the Liberals and how much more are you going to donate to us. That's effectively what
00:01:02.540 the Liberals want. According to them, this is very nasty and bad, what the Conservatives did by taking
00:01:08.780 calls from these individuals. Have you had any meetings with any MPs from any parties?
00:01:14.240 Yes, I have with my own MP, Michelle Ferreri. I have spoken to Larry Brock. Again, I work within
00:01:23.000 the realm of, I go through my MP, which is Michelle Ferreri. I'm from Peterborough-Kortha,
00:01:30.440 and she's my MP. I spoke with Larry Brock and his office regarding the carbon tax election. He was
00:01:38.760 very receptive of talking to people. I know that Ms. Lynn Brooks, who also was not allowed inside today, 0.95
00:01:45.640 she has made appointments and spoken to several Conservative MPs that they've opened their doors
00:01:53.080 and welcomed her to have a conversation and several other people. So we don't seem to be having a
00:01:59.080 problem with communication with the Conservatives. We seem to be being roadblocked in communication with
00:02:04.600 the NDP Party and the Liberal Party. And remember, this is something that the Liberals posted themselves.
00:02:10.680 This was their own ex-account where they published this video, because you're supposed to be very
00:02:15.160 scared that a Conservative MP will let you schedule a meeting with them, and then the meeting will
00:02:21.400 happen. The Liberals, again, apparently there's all these roadblocks that come into place in wanting
00:02:26.760 to actually talk to the Liberals about an issue that concerns you in some way. But I'm going to move on
00:02:33.000 from here and talk a little bit about the by-election happening out in Toronto St. Paul between the
00:02:42.920 Liberal candidate Leslie Church and the Conservative candidate Don Stewart. I'll have more thoughts
00:02:48.280 about this in the future, but you can tell that this one has really concerned the Liberals, because
00:02:53.880 whenever the Liberals are concerned about anything political, they will start talking about abortion again
00:02:59.720 for no reason. And I actually like the fact that they're talking about it, because if anything,
00:03:04.440 they're making the country more pro-life, because nobody likes the Liberals' positions on anything.
00:03:10.200 The Liberals could come out against, it doesn't even really matter. This is honestly what happens
00:03:16.200 with Donald Trump. Every time they attack Donald Trump, Donald Trump gets more popular, because
00:03:20.200 Justin Trudeau has such little political credibility. Him attacking any person or political position
00:03:26.680 just makes that political position more popular. And so now they're wheeling out the abortion thing 1.00
00:03:32.040 again and going after, you know, Arnold Veerson, a very good Conservative MP for talking about pro-life
00:03:39.240 issues with Josie Lutec from the Campaign Life Coalition, because you're not allowed to talk to pro-life
00:03:45.960 Catholic organizations. The Liberals are saying, share if you're proudly pro-choice. And you're like
00:03:50.520 wondering like, well, what's going on? Why are they sharing this? Well, they're potentially losing an
00:03:54.520 election today in a strong liberal, like a strong liberal stronghold, an area that the Liberals have
00:04:01.080 not lost since 1998, I believe, uh, not 98, 93, or even might have actually been 88. It's been a long
00:04:09.480 time. It's been so long. I can't exactly remember how long it's been. I was not alive at the time. I'm
00:04:15.720 sorry. But yeah, like they're, they just keep posting more abortion stuff. I don't know why they're
00:04:22.040 going after Kathy Wagenthal here, because I guess Kathy Wagenthal is anti-woman by the Liberals' 0.99
00:04:27.320 standpoint, because she is not completely anti-life. Again, the federal Liberals are not a pro-choice
00:04:34.680 party. I'm a pro-life individual, but they're not a pro-choice party. They are just like a goblin
00:04:39.880 party. And that's a very childish way for me to say that, guys, they literally voted against increased
00:04:45.560 protections for pregnant women if they are assaulted and killed. That if a pregnant woman is assaulted and
00:04:50.920 miscarries or a pregnant woman is assaulted and killed, that shouldn't lead to any upgraded
00:04:55.560 sentences for the criminal responsible, because that would be giving actual human dignity to the
00:05:02.440 baby to consider that something that you could actually upgrade a sentence on. So if the Liberals
00:05:09.160 lose this by-election, if Leslie Church goes down to flaming defeat and Don Stewart wins, the Liberals are
00:05:15.240 going to have to figure out a way of getting rid of Justin Trudeau. I don't think it's maybe even the
00:05:19.400 best move, but just for the long-term prospects of the party, they need to get rid of Justin Trudeau.
00:05:24.600 Even if Justin Trudeau would perform better in the next election than a Mark Carney, than a
00:05:28.600 Christian Freeland or any other Liberal, the thing is that by having Justin Trudeau kind of dig his
00:05:33.960 claws in to the Prime Minister's office and stay there as long as possible, it hurts the party in
00:05:39.240 the four- to eight-year window, even if him being in office helps them win a couple more seats next
00:05:44.360 election. Or if the Liberals do hold on to this seat, in a certain sense, it's almost bad for them
00:05:50.040 because it stops Liberal insiders from having the opportunity to finally rally together some Liberal
00:05:55.320 members, national councillors for their party, you know, different MPs, cabinet ministers to try and
00:06:01.400 hold a palace coup to get rid of Justin Trudeau. At the same time, if the Liberals win, I think that
00:06:07.560 there does need to be some, not soul searching, but strategy professionalization inside the Conservative
00:06:14.520 Party. It might be better candidates, it might be more broader messaging, because as much as people
00:06:20.360 do not like the carbon tax, the problem is if you only talk about the carbon tax in the GTA, it's not
00:06:25.160 that people like the carbon tax in the GTA, but we need to be talking more about crime, we need to be
00:06:29.320 talking more about immigration, and if we're proving ourselves that in these winnable by-elections,
00:06:34.760 we're not getting across the finish line on a few of these tax issues, then it proves that we probably
00:06:39.400 need a more broad cultural, social and fiscal message, and it can't just be the carbon tax.
00:06:45.240 I hate the carbon tax as much as the next guy, but we should be also marketing on overall personal
00:06:49.880 income taxes, corporate income taxes, shutting down like funding to any woke organizations, we should 0.99
00:06:55.720 be pulling out of the WHO, because of just how ridiculous that organization is, it's a CCP front
00:07:01.480 group at this point. We should be marketing on having some stance on life issues, we should be
00:07:06.600 marketing against MAID. I know the party has stances on many of these issues, but it's sometimes that
00:07:11.560 if you don't turn up the volume on talking about it enough, it really didn't happen. That's where I
00:07:15.880 always get annoyed whenever people say, well, did you read the policy platform from that party? It was
00:07:20.680 really good on page 30. I liked some of those ideas. Guys, unless people know what you're running on
00:07:26.360 without having to read your platform, it didn't really happen, because most people don't know
00:07:30.680 what you said in your platform, so it makes it very easy to break those promises later, because only
00:07:34.920 like 15 people usually read the platform all the way through, and they're usually party insiders
00:07:40.120 or members of other parties trying to find lines where you had a misspelling in order to attack you
00:07:44.520 in the media. But anyways, we'll form up here tomorrow, I want to talk a little bit more about how this
00:07:50.120 by-election is going to affect the Canadian political landscape, should be interesting. If you guys want to sign
00:07:55.320 up to my political organizing list so I can recommend good nomination candidates or just good
00:08:00.120 people to vote for in any riding around the country, go sign up in my website in the description
00:08:05.720 below, wyattclaypool.com. You can even just type that in if you know how to spell my name,
00:08:09.720 wyattclaypool.com, and you can donate to my legal fund. The Give, Send, Go link in the description
00:08:14.760 below is where you can access the legal fund. We're being sued by a dishonest Chinese billionaire 1.00
00:08:20.120 trying to sue us for defamation, even though in two and a half years he has not found a shred of
00:08:24.440 evidence to how to prove what we said was defamatory at all. All of our reporting actually
00:08:29.720 on him was based off previous reporting from the Globe and Mail, and he apparently was too scared to
00:08:34.280 sue them, so he decided to sue someone who was 22 years old at the time that this lawsuit started.
00:08:40.200 Anyways, so that should be it for me today, guys. Have a good one.