00:22:12.100If outsiders, if immigrants want to fully participate in Japanese society, they are
00:22:16.740strongly incentivized to learn the language, to adopt the cultures and customs and respect that
00:22:22.180culture and that society. In contrast, what do we do over here in America? America has done the
00:22:27.220exact opposite. Because we are forbidden from discriminating against those who don't speak
00:22:31.540English, we have removed the natural social barriers that encourage assimilation. Instead,
00:22:36.400we accommodate foreigners, which helps them remain foreign, all while they exploit our economy and1.00
00:22:42.200our institutions. And as I mentioned in the last episode, 67% of Hispanic immigrants still cannot1.00
00:22:48.200speak English even after living in the United States for 15 years. This failure of assimilation1.00
00:22:55.340is a direct result of the Civil Rights Act and this kind of culture of forced integration it0.72
00:23:00.740created. So prior to the Civil Rights Act, the Irish faced a pretty brutal discrimination in
00:23:06.120America early on. You'd have signs that say, no Irish need apply to jobs, right? Signs in
00:23:14.440businesses and neighborhoods that were against the Irish. Yet that very pressure eventually forced
00:23:20.720the Irish to assimilate, to work hard and advance without any civil rights legislation needed.
00:23:27.200This was, and has been for thousands of years, the normal way that societies handled
00:23:32.060integration and cultural cohesion through natural social consequences rather than federal force.
00:23:38.860And this principle is not only wise civics, it's also biblical. Okay. It's also biblical.
00:23:44.220This entitlement and kind of rejection of assimilation are most glaringly on display0.97
00:23:50.740in the black community, which has been largely shielded by the civil rights act from the natural0.68
00:23:55.520social pressures that normally drive culture and moral assimilation. For example, we know
00:24:01.720blacks who comprise about 13% of the United States population, commit murder at 7 to 10 times0.99
00:24:09.700the per capita rate of whites, robbery at 9 to 10 times the rate, and overall violent crimes at 50.99
00:24:16.660to 6 times the rates of whites. And they also account for over 50% of all the robberies and0.96
00:24:21.740roughly 60% of the murders. Now, because of the Civil Rights Act, store owners are effectively
00:24:27.380held hostage and forbidden from exercising basic discrimination based on a particular group's
00:24:32.680behavior. So if businesses and communities could legally refuse service or association due to these
00:24:39.220high rates of theft and violence and disruptive behavior, the market would strongly incentivize
00:24:43.780what? Better conduct. Now, instead, what do they have to do? They're legally prohibited from doing
00:24:50.720these things. And as a result, store owners can't protect themselves or their customers by refusing
00:24:56.040service to these high risk groups. So what happens? Well, you get McDonald's starting to
00:25:01.220eliminate self-service drinks because consumer habits are changing. Okay. Businesses are forced
00:25:08.100to what? Lock up basic items like batteries and laundry detergent and deodorant. And they have to
00:25:13.160install bulletproof glass and higher private security. And what does this do? It raises the
00:25:18.400prices for everyone else. See, ultimately the rest of society suffers the widespread criminality
00:25:25.160and dysfunction of one particular community.0.99
00:25:28.060And yes, I know white people steal too,0.99
00:25:30.680but they do so at roughly one-tenth the rate of blacks.0.99
00:25:34.920In other words, the Civil Rights Act0.80
00:25:36.240gives protected classes immunity despite their behavior.
00:25:41.660And compounding this is the pervasive culture
00:25:44.320of white guilt that ensures that any serious attempt0.98
00:25:47.280to hold blacks accountable is instantly labeled racist.0.80
00:25:51.780Okay, and what this does is it further removes0.70
00:25:53.280any real incentive for civilized behavior. Martin Luther King Jr., he actually said himself,
00:25:59.420he said, quote, it is a historical fact that a privileged group seldom gives up their privileges
00:26:04.680voluntarily, end quote. Now, what many people don't know is that blacks were actually making
00:26:11.200significant social and economic progress prior to the Civil Rights Act and the massive expansion
00:26:17.560of welfare. That's certainly involved as well. But once white guilt and the reparations mentality
00:26:23.620took root, Black accountability largely just collapsed. But they were. They were doing,0.97
00:26:28.720there was higher morality, lower divorce rates. Fathers were more in the home. I mean, they were
00:26:34.640truly assimilating into an American culture, at least morally, prior to the Civil Rights Act.
00:26:44.040Now, why would any group willingly surrender legal protections, government preferences,
00:26:49.260affirmative action, DEI initiatives, and kind of the powerful high moral ground of perpetual
00:26:55.520victimhood? Like, why would they give that up? Okay, this has created a deeply unhealthy dynamic.
00:27:01.640So whites are paralyzed by guilt and blacks are insulated from the normal social pressures that0.86
00:27:07.120encourage good behavior and assimilation. Okay, the Civil Rights Act is truly the murderer of0.94
00:27:13.160assimilation and national cohesion. It forces people together regardless of behavior or0.63
00:27:19.740preference. And as a result, it breeds resentment and creates far more racism than it ever actually
00:27:24.780cured. And so lastly, the Civil Rights Act gave us something even more insidious. It's called
00:27:32.900disparate impact theory. And this legal doctrine holds that even if a policy or practice is
00:27:41.020completely colorblind. Okay. There's no racial intent whatsoever. It can still be ruled illegal
00:27:48.280as a form of discrimination if it produces unequal outcomes between particular racial groups.
00:27:57.880So I'm going to give you an example. The landmark case for this is Griggs versus Duke Power Company
00:28:03.400in 1971. And it's the foundation of this disparate impact theory. Duke Power,
00:28:09.720They're a private company and they're simply requiring a high school diploma and a basic
00:28:15.940aptitude test for certain higher paying jobs, right? Very normal. The company applied this
00:28:22.520standard equally to every single applicant, regardless of race. However, because Black1.00
00:28:28.240applicants as a group scored lower on average, the Supreme Court ruled their requirements were
00:28:35.320illegal, even though there were zero evidence of intentional discrimination. Okay, the court
00:28:41.240essentially said, if the test has a racially unequal outcome, it's discriminatory. Okay, this
00:28:49.720decision, what did it do? It opened the floodgates for lawsuits against any objective standards that
00:28:57.440didn't produce equal racial results because, let me remind you, blacks and whites are not equal,0.97
00:29:03.760especially in IQ. And so because of that, the results are all that matters. So this is again,1.00
00:29:12.260classic Marxism. If you can't raise the bottom, lower the top. Okay. That's exactly what happened
00:29:19.060because whites average, uh, you know, have an average IQ of about a hundred and blacks are0.96
00:29:23.520between 80 and 85. The civil rights act says that we must play to the lowest common denominator,0.66
00:29:28.800which, as a result, reduces societal output as a whole. Now, even a more absurd case, which is,
00:29:37.660I think, a little more modern, is Ritchie v. Stefano in 2009. This is in New Haven, Connecticut,
00:29:45.920and the city gave a promotion exam to firefighters. White and Hispanic firefighters,
00:29:50.980they studied hard, they passed the test at high rates, and they earned promotions as a result.
00:29:55.220However, because almost no black firefighters passed this test, the city threw out the test
00:30:01.940results entirely. They discarded the legitimate achievements of the men who had prepared and
00:30:07.540performed very well solely to do what? To avoid a potential disparate impact lawsuit from the black0.99
00:30:14.900applicants. Okay. The white firefighters, they sued and the Supreme court actually ruled in their0.89
00:30:22.420favor, which was great, but the case perfectly exposes the insanity. The government actively0.88
00:30:27.840punished competence and rewarded failure in order to achieve racial balance. It truly is a form of0.87
00:30:35.800tyranny. The equity or equality was higher than the meritocracy of results. And as a result of
00:30:44.580this chaos is the direct result of rejecting a biblical definition of nations. And what I mean
00:30:51.820by that is that all of this is happening because we are neglecting God's design and the historical
00:30:59.840witness of nations. Scripture presents nations as what? Large extended families. They're bound by
00:31:06.460blood, bound by language, culture, land, religion. When you abandon that definition and you import0.84
00:31:13.460large numbers of different peoples into the same country, then you grant them protected class
00:31:19.920status, while making any pressure to assimilate illegal, you are not building a stronger nation.
00:31:26.300You are basically guaranteeing the future conflict and possibly the failure of the nation.
00:31:32.640See, real community can only exist among people who voluntarily choose one another.
00:31:38.680Okay, when the state forces association and removes the natural social costs of being different,
00:31:44.100it destroys the very possibility of genuine unity.
00:31:49.920And this doesn't just apply to race. If we actually followed scripture, homosexuals would1.00
00:31:55.120have no special privileges in a Christian nation. Muslims and Hindus would not be celebrated for1.00
00:31:59.960building mosques and shrines in our Christian towns. It doesn't mean that we don't treat them
00:32:05.520with charity. We're not saying that we are cruel to them, but it does mean that we should make
00:32:12.600them feel the natural cost of being religiously and morally foreign in a Christian homeland.1.00
00:32:21.120And they should expect essentially that the native population will not want their culture,0.95
00:32:26.740their values, or their religions, or their morals to reshape or replace the native populations.0.84
00:32:32.600Okay. This is exactly why immigration naturally was limited for most of human history.0.96
00:32:39.300People didn't want to move to places where they would forever feel like outsiders and
00:32:45.520face kind of the disapproval of the native population.
00:32:49.120That healthy social pressure is why places like Japan remain culturally distinct.
00:32:53.820When you remove that pressure through law and incentivized foreign invasion with no
00:33:00.240assimilation, you don't get harmony.0.90
00:33:02.580You get native resentment, balkanization, and eventual national collapse.0.89
00:33:08.480So the Civil Rights Act was not progress. It was a rebellion, and it was truly against the
00:33:17.640created order. And I believe that it's time that we repeal it. But here we are. This is our moment.
00:33:24.200We need to have these conversations. And a lot of people ask me, why are we having these
00:33:27.840conversations? It's almost impossible to repeal something like the Civil Rights Act or the 19th
00:33:33.240Amendment. I may have said this in a previous episode, but I'm going to say it again.
00:33:36.620We're talking about it because if America does balkanize, if we do get a new America,
00:33:43.340you know, the 12 nations structure or whatever it may be, if we get some sort of structure,
00:33:48.440I want those that separate from the liberal world and liberal order to understand the rationale
00:33:55.540against things like the Civil Rights Act, against the post-war consensus, against the Hart-Celler
00:34:02.040Act against the 19th Amendment. So that when, and I do believe maybe in five to 10 years,
00:34:07.420we do have some sort of birth of a new nation after some sort of conflict or intensity or
00:34:14.800agitation that's, I believe, growing right now, that that new nation would remember.
00:34:20.840And so my hope is really just building up some of this momentum for that future reality. And
00:34:27.840we just kind of lay this in the hands of God and his providence, and we'll see what happens.
00:34:33.500So let's go ahead and let's move on to our weekly audit.
00:34:43.740So I have a few videos for you guys today, about three videos, and they kind of revolve around
00:34:49.920this theme of the civil rights. And we're going to look at the BLM era, talking about the COVID
00:34:55.300era and the kind of white, you know, atonement for their past racism. We're also going to look at
00:35:01.360some individuals and black people in businesses that are not following the rules or the laws.
00:35:08.820So let's go ahead and go to the first video. We'll have some commentary after it.
00:35:25.300So what we're seeing here, this, of course, is, again, during the COVID-2020 BLM era.0.89
00:35:39.820And we witnessed, you know, I think is one of the most pathetic spectacles in modern history,0.81
00:35:44.480right? You got whites kneeling and publicly confessing their whiteness to atone for the0.99
00:35:48.660sins of their ancestors. And it wasn't just this one video. We saw this everywhere, right? Everybody's0.88
00:35:54.220taken a knee and corporate executives and pastors and politicians are bowing to people who were
00:36:00.160never enslaved, okay? Now, why is this insane? Okay, first, most American whites descended from
00:36:06.500people who arrived after slavery ended or never even owned slaves, okay? Second, blacks in America0.94
00:36:13.300are far wealthier, safer, and freer than blacks living in any other black-run nation on earth.0.95
00:36:19.180Third, slavery was a universal human practice for thousands of years. Africans themselves0.93
00:36:26.360sold other Africans into the trade. And so it was white Christians who ended chattel slavery.0.76
00:36:33.720Again, so the Civil Rights Act turned this kind of historical guilt complex into public policy.0.53
00:36:39.840And instead of encouraging personal responsibility and assimilation,
00:36:43.320it created a permanent victim class with these kind of legal and social privileges.
00:36:47.900And so what began as equal rights became ritualized racial theater. And I think we saw that through the BLM era. It was the first time I think it kind of came out and presented itself, manifested itself on a grand scale. We thought, wow, this is really a thing.
00:37:05.360but it's not it doesn't just stop there we all know that uh there is differences in the way
00:37:12.880that white consumers and black consumers relate to businesses and let's look at those videos right0.99
00:37:18.880now it ups oh you gotta have a shirt on man get my shit on get it free you gotta have a shirt on0.97
00:37:25.840i can't serve you no shirt yeah bro right i'm gonna need that i'm gonna need that all right0.90