How the Civil Rights Act of 1964 led to White Guilt and Minority Entitlement in America, and led to the creation of White Nationalism and the loss of National Identity. In this episode of American Identity, Dale Partridge examines the logic behind the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 and how it opened the floodgates to mass third-world immigration and was the initiation of national theft.
00:22:12.100If outsiders, if immigrants want to fully participate in Japanese society, they are
00:22:16.740strongly incentivized to learn the language, to adopt the cultures and customs and respect that
00:22:22.180culture and that society. In contrast, what do we do over here in America? America has done the
00:22:27.220exact opposite. Because we are forbidden from discriminating against those who don't speak
00:22:31.540English, we have removed the natural social barriers that encourage assimilation. Instead,
00:22:36.400we accommodate foreigners, which helps them remain foreign, all while they exploit our economy and1.00
00:22:42.200our institutions. And as I mentioned in the last episode, 67% of Hispanic immigrants still cannot1.00
00:22:48.200speak English even after living in the United States for 15 years. This failure of assimilation1.00
00:22:55.340is a direct result of the Civil Rights Act and this kind of culture of forced integration it0.72
00:23:00.740created. So prior to the Civil Rights Act, the Irish faced a pretty brutal discrimination in
00:23:06.120America early on. You'd have signs that say, no Irish need apply to jobs, right? Signs in
00:23:14.440businesses and neighborhoods that were against the Irish. Yet that very pressure eventually forced
00:23:20.720the Irish to assimilate, to work hard and advance without any civil rights legislation needed.
00:23:27.200This was, and has been for thousands of years, the normal way that societies handled
00:23:32.060integration and cultural cohesion through natural social consequences rather than federal force.
00:23:38.860And this principle is not only wise civics, it's also biblical. Okay. It's also biblical.
00:23:44.220This entitlement and kind of rejection of assimilation are most glaringly on display0.97
00:23:50.740in the black community, which has been largely shielded by the civil rights act from the natural0.68
00:23:55.520social pressures that normally drive culture and moral assimilation. For example, we know
00:24:01.720blacks who comprise about 13% of the United States population, commit murder at 7 to 10 times0.99
00:24:09.700the per capita rate of whites, robbery at 9 to 10 times the rate, and overall violent crimes at 50.99
00:24:16.660to 6 times the rates of whites. And they also account for over 50% of all the robberies and0.96
00:24:21.740roughly 60% of the murders. Now, because of the Civil Rights Act, store owners are effectively
00:24:27.380held hostage and forbidden from exercising basic discrimination based on a particular group's
00:24:32.680behavior. So if businesses and communities could legally refuse service or association due to these
00:24:39.220high rates of theft and violence and disruptive behavior, the market would strongly incentivize
00:24:43.780what? Better conduct. Now, instead, what do they have to do? They're legally prohibited from doing
00:24:50.720these things. And as a result, store owners can't protect themselves or their customers by refusing
00:24:56.040service to these high risk groups. So what happens? Well, you get McDonald's starting to
00:25:01.220eliminate self-service drinks because consumer habits are changing. Okay. Businesses are forced
00:25:08.100to what? Lock up basic items like batteries and laundry detergent and deodorant. And they have to
00:25:13.160install bulletproof glass and higher private security. And what does this do? It raises the
00:25:18.400prices for everyone else. See, ultimately the rest of society suffers the widespread criminality
00:25:25.160and dysfunction of one particular community.0.99
00:25:28.060And yes, I know white people steal too,0.99
00:25:30.680but they do so at roughly one-tenth the rate of blacks.0.99
00:25:34.920In other words, the Civil Rights Act0.80
00:25:36.240gives protected classes immunity despite their behavior.
00:25:41.660And compounding this is the pervasive culture
00:25:44.320of white guilt that ensures that any serious attempt0.98
00:25:47.280to hold blacks accountable is instantly labeled racist.0.80
00:25:51.780Okay, and what this does is it further removes0.70
00:25:53.280any real incentive for civilized behavior. Martin Luther King Jr., he actually said himself,
00:25:59.420he said, quote, it is a historical fact that a privileged group seldom gives up their privileges
00:26:04.680voluntarily, end quote. Now, what many people don't know is that blacks were actually making
00:26:11.200significant social and economic progress prior to the Civil Rights Act and the massive expansion
00:26:17.560of welfare. That's certainly involved as well. But once white guilt and the reparations mentality
00:26:23.620took root, Black accountability largely just collapsed. But they were. They were doing,0.97
00:26:28.720there was higher morality, lower divorce rates. Fathers were more in the home. I mean, they were
00:26:34.640truly assimilating into an American culture, at least morally, prior to the Civil Rights Act.
00:26:44.040Now, why would any group willingly surrender legal protections, government preferences,
00:26:49.260affirmative action, DEI initiatives, and kind of the powerful high moral ground of perpetual
00:26:55.520victimhood? Like, why would they give that up? Okay, this has created a deeply unhealthy dynamic.
00:27:01.640So whites are paralyzed by guilt and blacks are insulated from the normal social pressures that0.86
00:27:07.120encourage good behavior and assimilation. Okay, the Civil Rights Act is truly the murderer of0.94
00:27:13.160assimilation and national cohesion. It forces people together regardless of behavior or0.63
00:27:19.740preference. And as a result, it breeds resentment and creates far more racism than it ever actually
00:27:24.780cured. And so lastly, the Civil Rights Act gave us something even more insidious. It's called
00:27:32.900disparate impact theory. And this legal doctrine holds that even if a policy or practice is
00:27:41.020completely colorblind. Okay. There's no racial intent whatsoever. It can still be ruled illegal
00:27:48.280as a form of discrimination if it produces unequal outcomes between particular racial groups.
00:27:57.880So I'm going to give you an example. The landmark case for this is Griggs versus Duke Power Company
00:28:03.400in 1971. And it's the foundation of this disparate impact theory. Duke Power,
00:28:09.720They're a private company and they're simply requiring a high school diploma and a basic
00:28:15.940aptitude test for certain higher paying jobs, right? Very normal. The company applied this
00:28:22.520standard equally to every single applicant, regardless of race. However, because Black1.00
00:28:28.240applicants as a group scored lower on average, the Supreme Court ruled their requirements were
00:28:35.320illegal, even though there were zero evidence of intentional discrimination. Okay, the court
00:28:41.240essentially said, if the test has a racially unequal outcome, it's discriminatory. Okay, this
00:28:49.720decision, what did it do? It opened the floodgates for lawsuits against any objective standards that
00:28:57.440didn't produce equal racial results because, let me remind you, blacks and whites are not equal,0.97
00:29:03.760especially in IQ. And so because of that, the results are all that matters. So this is again,1.00
00:29:12.260classic Marxism. If you can't raise the bottom, lower the top. Okay. That's exactly what happened
00:29:19.060because whites average, uh, you know, have an average IQ of about a hundred and blacks are0.96
00:29:23.520between 80 and 85. The civil rights act says that we must play to the lowest common denominator,0.66
00:29:28.800which, as a result, reduces societal output as a whole. Now, even a more absurd case, which is,
00:29:37.660I think, a little more modern, is Ritchie v. Stefano in 2009. This is in New Haven, Connecticut,
00:29:45.920and the city gave a promotion exam to firefighters. White and Hispanic firefighters,
00:29:50.980they studied hard, they passed the test at high rates, and they earned promotions as a result.
00:29:55.220However, because almost no black firefighters passed this test, the city threw out the test
00:30:01.940results entirely. They discarded the legitimate achievements of the men who had prepared and
00:30:07.540performed very well solely to do what? To avoid a potential disparate impact lawsuit from the black0.99
00:30:14.900applicants. Okay. The white firefighters, they sued and the Supreme court actually ruled in their0.89
00:30:22.420favor, which was great, but the case perfectly exposes the insanity. The government actively0.88
00:30:27.840punished competence and rewarded failure in order to achieve racial balance. It truly is a form of0.87
00:30:35.800tyranny. The equity or equality was higher than the meritocracy of results. And as a result of
00:30:44.580this chaos is the direct result of rejecting a biblical definition of nations. And what I mean
00:30:51.820by that is that all of this is happening because we are neglecting God's design and the historical
00:30:59.840witness of nations. Scripture presents nations as what? Large extended families. They're bound by
00:31:06.460blood, bound by language, culture, land, religion. When you abandon that definition and you import0.84
00:31:13.460large numbers of different peoples into the same country, then you grant them protected class
00:31:19.920status, while making any pressure to assimilate illegal, you are not building a stronger nation.
00:31:26.300You are basically guaranteeing the future conflict and possibly the failure of the nation.
00:31:32.640See, real community can only exist among people who voluntarily choose one another.
00:31:38.680Okay, when the state forces association and removes the natural social costs of being different,
00:31:44.100it destroys the very possibility of genuine unity.
00:31:49.920And this doesn't just apply to race. If we actually followed scripture, homosexuals would1.00
00:31:55.120have no special privileges in a Christian nation. Muslims and Hindus would not be celebrated for1.00
00:31:59.960building mosques and shrines in our Christian towns. It doesn't mean that we don't treat them
00:32:05.520with charity. We're not saying that we are cruel to them, but it does mean that we should make
00:32:12.600them feel the natural cost of being religiously and morally foreign in a Christian homeland.1.00
00:32:21.120And they should expect essentially that the native population will not want their culture,0.95
00:32:26.740their values, or their religions, or their morals to reshape or replace the native populations.0.84
00:32:32.600Okay. This is exactly why immigration naturally was limited for most of human history.0.96
00:32:39.300People didn't want to move to places where they would forever feel like outsiders and
00:32:45.520face kind of the disapproval of the native population.
00:32:49.120That healthy social pressure is why places like Japan remain culturally distinct.
00:32:53.820When you remove that pressure through law and incentivized foreign invasion with no
00:33:00.240assimilation, you don't get harmony.0.90
00:33:02.580You get native resentment, balkanization, and eventual national collapse.0.89
00:33:08.480So the Civil Rights Act was not progress. It was a rebellion, and it was truly against the
00:33:17.640created order. And I believe that it's time that we repeal it. But here we are. This is our moment.
00:33:24.200We need to have these conversations. And a lot of people ask me, why are we having these
00:33:27.840conversations? It's almost impossible to repeal something like the Civil Rights Act or the 19th
00:33:33.240Amendment. I may have said this in a previous episode, but I'm going to say it again.
00:33:36.620We're talking about it because if America does balkanize, if we do get a new America,
00:33:43.340you know, the 12 nations structure or whatever it may be, if we get some sort of structure,
00:33:48.440I want those that separate from the liberal world and liberal order to understand the rationale
00:33:55.540against things like the Civil Rights Act, against the post-war consensus, against the Hart-Celler
00:34:02.040Act against the 19th Amendment. So that when, and I do believe maybe in five to 10 years,
00:34:07.420we do have some sort of birth of a new nation after some sort of conflict or intensity or
00:34:14.800agitation that's, I believe, growing right now, that that new nation would remember.
00:34:20.840And so my hope is really just building up some of this momentum for that future reality. And
00:34:27.840we just kind of lay this in the hands of God and his providence, and we'll see what happens.
00:34:33.500So let's go ahead and let's move on to our weekly audit.
00:34:43.740So I have a few videos for you guys today, about three videos, and they kind of revolve around
00:34:49.920this theme of the civil rights. And we're going to look at the BLM era, talking about the COVID
00:34:55.300era and the kind of white, you know, atonement for their past racism. We're also going to look at
00:35:01.360some individuals and black people in businesses that are not following the rules or the laws.
00:35:08.820So let's go ahead and go to the first video. We'll have some commentary after it.
00:35:25.300So what we're seeing here, this, of course, is, again, during the COVID-2020 BLM era.0.89
00:35:39.820And we witnessed, you know, I think is one of the most pathetic spectacles in modern history,0.81
00:35:44.480right? You got whites kneeling and publicly confessing their whiteness to atone for the0.99
00:35:48.660sins of their ancestors. And it wasn't just this one video. We saw this everywhere, right? Everybody's0.88
00:35:54.220taken a knee and corporate executives and pastors and politicians are bowing to people who were
00:36:00.160never enslaved, okay? Now, why is this insane? Okay, first, most American whites descended from
00:36:06.500people who arrived after slavery ended or never even owned slaves, okay? Second, blacks in America0.94
00:36:13.300are far wealthier, safer, and freer than blacks living in any other black-run nation on earth.0.95
00:36:19.180Third, slavery was a universal human practice for thousands of years. Africans themselves0.93
00:36:26.360sold other Africans into the trade. And so it was white Christians who ended chattel slavery.0.76
00:36:33.720Again, so the Civil Rights Act turned this kind of historical guilt complex into public policy.0.53
00:36:39.840And instead of encouraging personal responsibility and assimilation,
00:36:43.320it created a permanent victim class with these kind of legal and social privileges.
00:36:47.900And so what began as equal rights became ritualized racial theater. And I think we saw that through the BLM era. It was the first time I think it kind of came out and presented itself, manifested itself on a grand scale. We thought, wow, this is really a thing.
00:37:05.360but it's not it doesn't just stop there we all know that uh there is differences in the way
00:37:12.880that white consumers and black consumers relate to businesses and let's look at those videos right0.99
00:37:18.880now it ups oh you gotta have a shirt on man get my shit on get it free you gotta have a shirt on0.97
00:37:25.840i can't serve you no shirt yeah bro right i'm gonna need that i'm gonna need that all right0.90