The NXR Podcast - BONUS EPISODE - #FontGate #G3 ｜ The Statement On Christian Nationalism And The Gospel

00:00:00 All right, listen, guys, I get it.

00:00:02 Many of you are unable to financially support this ministry

00:00:04 because you're spending your cash and your lives

00:00:07 on raising young children

00:00:08 in the fear and admonition of the Lord.

00:00:10 Praise God for you and that endeavor.

00:00:13 However, algorithms are a thing.

00:00:16 Shadow banning, sadly, is a thing.

00:00:18 And one major way that you can help to expand

00:00:21 the reach and effectiveness of this ministry

00:00:24 that doesn't cost you a dime

00:00:25 is by spending just a few moments

00:00:28 leaving us a five-star review. Also, perhaps even more effective than that, you can share

00:00:34 our podcast with a friend. We hope you'll take the time to do so. Thank you so much. God bless.

00:00:43 All right, welcome back to another live Monday episode. I am your host, Pastor Joel Webin with

00:00:48 Right Response Ministries. What we're going to be discussing today is the statement on Christian

00:00:54 nationalism and the gospel. I am one of the contributors to this statement, so there were

00:01:01 about six or eight guys that were involved in the process. Two of the guys, Dusty Devers being one

00:01:07 of them, another guy, James, they were in it for the long haul. They were doing a lot of the

00:01:12 original drafting, original writing from the very beginning over the course of a few months now,

00:01:17 since February actually is when they began this project, recognizing that at the end of the day

00:01:22 we have faithful brothers that we continue to talk past one another because we need clearly defined

00:01:28 terms what do we mean by christian how christian are mormons christian jehovah's witness catholic

00:01:35 what does that mean christian uh christian uh defined by what and then we also of course

00:01:41 the bigger beef is probably what is a nation and what about this this uh the the last three little

00:01:48 letters on that word nationalism what about that ism right are we talking third reich hitler

00:01:55 nationalism what what kind of nationalism are we talking about so there's just been a lot of

00:02:01 confusion a lot of talking past one another there's been guys on both sides of the aisle

00:02:05 that you know have gone i think beyond the pale in ways that are unhelpful i am squarely within

00:02:12 the Christian nationalist position. So my true position, you guys know if you've been following

00:02:19 me for any length of time, is that I am confessionally reformed. I am covenant in my

00:02:25 theology, covenant theology. I hold to biblical patriarchy. Complementarianism is too soft for me.

00:02:31 Biblical patriarchy is where I would hang my hat. I'm also presuppositional. I am not a Thomist.

00:02:37 at the end of the day natural revelation and natural law these things i think are true there's

00:02:43 a true sense to them but i do not want to put my hope ultimately in man's reason man's reason is

00:02:49 flawed by the fall he is totally depraved including his rationale and so as a presuppositional guy

00:02:57 the the shortest way i could define that is when guys are making arguments about god and about his

00:03:02 law and about the gospel and salvation and all these different things, I'm going to say God wrote

00:03:08 a book. Other guys are going to say, here's the book. The book is authoritative, but the reason

00:03:13 you know the book's authoritative is because of these other authorities that the book's authority

00:03:17 rests upon. And I'm going to say, no, thank you. There are other authorities, but all of them are

00:03:23 ultimately secondary authorities, not primary. The Bible is the foundational authority. So I can trust

00:03:29 my sense perception. I can trust my reason and rationale. Laws of logic are trustworthy because

00:03:35 there's a God in heaven and he told me so. So what's the reliability for the Bible? I know that

00:03:41 the Bible is the authoritative word of God because the Bible tells me so. And if some Thomas wants to

00:03:48 say that's circular logic and you can't use that or whatever, at the end of the day, God wrote a

00:03:53 book, right? So if you're wondering, what does it mean to be Vantillian? What's it mean to be

00:03:57 presuppositional in the vein of Cornelius Van Til, in the vein of Greg Bonson and some of the

00:04:04 early Reconstructionists, you know, R.J. Rush Dooney, guys like Gary North. What does it mean

00:04:08 to be presuppositional in that light? Guys like James White, guys like Jeff Durbin. It means that

00:04:15 we're going to say God wrote a book and we can use the book. That I don't have to make all these

00:04:21 other arguments. I can just say God wrote the book. So my position, I am confessionally reformed.

00:04:26 I hold to covenant theology.

00:04:27 I hold to biblical patriarchy.

00:04:30 I am presuppositional rather than atonist.

00:04:32 I am Kyperian rather than, certainly not radical 2K,

00:04:36 but there's a distinction between radical two-kingdom theology

00:04:39 versus a classic two-kingdom theology.

00:04:42 I would disavow both, recognizing that one is far worse than the other,

00:04:47 but I would disavow both.

00:04:48 I would hold to a Kyperian, all of Christ, for all of life. 0.98

00:04:52 I think there are two kingdoms,

00:04:53 but the separation between these two kingdoms is not the common and the sacred,

00:04:57 but rather is the kingdom of light and darkness.

00:05:00 One king, Jesus Christ, over both kingdoms, light and darkness,

00:05:05 and three autonomous, individual, divinely instituted sovereign spheres,

00:05:10 the home, the church, and the state.

00:05:12 You can have the kingdom of darkness in the church when you have an apostate,

00:05:15 when you have a false teacher.

00:05:16 You can have the kingdom of light in the state.

00:05:19 It's not common, merely common. 1.00

00:05:21 It is sacred when you have a Christian in the civil magistrate who is living and executing

00:05:27 laws in a Christianly manner, all right? 1.00

00:05:30 So, Kuyperian.

00:05:32 And then lastly, or the last two, is that I would hold to general equity theonomy, and

00:05:38 then I would also hold to post-millennial eschatology.

00:05:42 So, Reformed Confessionally Reformed, 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith would be

00:05:48 my home where I rest.

00:05:51 my head um so reformed and confessionally reformed and then covenant theology not dispensationalism

00:05:57 uh biblical patriarchy certainly not egalitarianism also not a soft complementarianism biblical

00:06:03 patriarchy uh presuppositional not atonist uh kyperion all of christ for all of life two kingdoms

00:06:11 yes but it's light and dark not common and sacred um and then general equity theonomy god's law i

00:06:18 think it's theonomy or autonomy it's either god's law or man's law i will take god's law

00:06:23 by what standard and then lastly a hopeful eschatology post-millennial eschatology that

00:06:28 christ is reigning here and now the pre-millennial believes that christ will reign here but not now

00:06:34 the all-millennial believes that christ is reigning now but not here the post-millennial

00:06:40 believes that christ is reigning both here and now and progressively in real tangible ways is it a

00:06:46 culture war or spiritual war the answer is both yes it's a spiritual war but here's the thing

00:06:51 about this spiritual war the spiritual war is between the god of heaven and the devil and all

00:06:57 his minions and guess what god cares about the earth and the devil cares about the earth i've

00:07:03 found that the only entity that i'm aware of that doesn't democrats care about what happens in the

00:07:07 world physical tangible things so the democrats care about the world god cares about the world

00:07:12 the devil cares about the world the only people that don't care about the world are evangelical

00:07:16 christians i'm not among them not in that sense not in that way so yes it's a spiritual war

00:07:23 but it's both it's a spiritual war that has cultural implications and therefore it is also

00:07:28 a cultural war because god cares about the culture and the devil cares about the culture

00:07:33 and the progressives and the wokies and they care about the culture and i think that evangelical 0.57

00:07:38 christians should too so when i say post-millennial i'm saying that god is reigning now but not in the

00:07:45 17th dimension. He's not only reigning now, but he's also reigning here. The post-millennial and

00:07:51 the pre-millennial agree on the nature of the kingdom. The all-millennial and the post-millennial

00:07:58 agree on the timing of the kingdom. So the all-mill and the post-mill, they say, hey, we agree on the

00:08:03 timing. Christ is reigning now. Yes and amen. Pre-mill and post-mill agree on the nature of

00:08:08 the kingdom, that it's physical, that it's tangible, that it's real, it's actual. But the

00:08:15 post mill is the only one, in my assessment, even among optimistic all mill guys who I appreciate

00:08:20 and I'm grateful for, the post mill is the only guy with his eschatology that says Christ reign

00:08:25 is both here, tangible, physical realities. It has cultural effects, physical effects,

00:08:32 political effects. Christ is reigning here and he's reigning now. So that's my theology. So if

00:08:38 you're wondering well what's joel's position my position is that i'm a theonomist my position is

00:08:43 that i'm post-millennial my position is that i'm also a reformed baptist my position is i'm

00:08:48 presuppositional i'm patriarchal i'm covenantal and i am kyperian all of christ for all of life

00:08:54 that's my position so why christian nationalism um because you catch more flies with honey than

00:09:02 vinegar and as someone who's post-millennial here's one of the things i'm committed to because

00:09:07 I think some post-millennials, they just want to do hashtag that post-mill, but it's all just pie

00:09:11 in the sky. They're not serious. I'm interested in being a serious person and I'm interested in

00:09:17 partnering with serious people. The reason why I'm willing to wear the Christian nationalist

00:09:21 badge is because I'm not, it's not whether but which, right? So if you're not Christian, 0.87

00:09:27 there's no neutral ground. If you're not Christian, you're pagan. Secularism is just a placeholder 0.82

00:09:32 for paganism right so i am distinctly christian and then the nationalist side while i'm not a

00:09:37 tribalist i'm certainly not a globalist no thank you george soros i am a nationalist i believe in

00:09:43 the biblical goodness of nations that god act 17 he appoints their times and borders so i believe

00:09:51 in nations and i am a christian so in that sense i'm a christian nationalist i'm hosting the

00:09:56 theonomy and post-millennialism conference this weekend so so that's my strategy that is my

00:10:02 doctrinal conviction but i'm willing to not set that aside never going to set my convictions

00:10:09 aside but but i'm willing to work within those convictions under a larger banner that i see as

00:10:15 being christian nationalism that can catch more flies with honey than vinegar that can get some

00:10:20 other people who maybe aren't post-millennial maybe they're not theonomic maybe they're not

00:10:24 maybe they're not presuppositional maybe they're not even reformed in their theology and their

00:10:29 understanding of salvation the sovereignty of god but but they're this dispensational arminian

00:10:35 you know christian normie uh but but they you know what they can agree with what they can get

00:10:40 behind of uh they can get behind the christian nationalist mantra it apparently seems to have 0.61

00:10:46 come about that our mantra is this uh christian nation gooder than transing kids

00:10:51 christian nation gooder than trans and kids right that it's the cry of the people the blue collar

00:10:59 pew sitting uh baptist or anglican or presbyterian uh who just says at the end of the day yeah 0.82

00:11:05 christian culture is good it's a good thing and it's worth fighting for and i'd rather be in a

00:11:09 christian nation um that has to figure out you know blasphemy laws you know 200 years from now

00:11:15 than a secular humanistic nation that murders 65 million children in their mother's womb and is 0.94

00:11:23 sexually mutilating children. It's not that hard, right? So that guy may not be post-millennial. 0.72

00:11:28 He may not be theonomic, but he can get behind Christian nation gooder than transing kids, 0.90

00:11:36 Christian nationalism. And that's why I was willing to participate with about six or eight 0.97

00:11:40 other guys in writing the statement on christian nationalism and the gospel and i stand behind the

00:11:47 statement i think it's fantastic so i came on as one of the primary editors in the in the 11th hour

00:11:54 i'm making some edits with dusty deavers who's one of the the first original writers him and james

00:12:00 and so i stand behind the statement i think it's glorious i think it's fantastic we're going to go

00:12:05 over at least some of it. It's 21 affirmations and denials with kind of an introduction defining

00:12:11 what we mean by Christian and what we mean by nationalist. So we'll get the introduction,

00:12:18 those definitions of Christian and nationalists, and we'll get through as many of the affirmations

00:12:23 and denials as we can. I stand behind the statement. I think it's fantastic. Before

00:12:27 jumping into that, though, I do want to address Fontgate 2023. All right. So it's Monday. It's

00:12:35 the very beginning of the week, and we've wasted no time in Christian Twitter world

00:12:42 jumping into the next controversy. Still, it's been about a month now, controversy about Christian

00:12:48 nationalism, but there's been new pieces of the puzzle, new chapters in this book of the saga of

00:12:55 the war with Christian nationalism versus whatever. And the latest chapter starting this

00:13:03 week is font gate 2023. So let me go ahead and dispel some myths. Uh, number one, it is absolutely

00:13:11 true, uh, that the exact font, not just accidental, not, it's not a coincidence. I'm going to shoot 0.62

00:13:18 you straight. Not a coincidence, not accidental. It is the exact same font as the statement on 0.99

00:13:24 social justice and the gospel, uh, which is not G3 statement. They participated Josh Bice. I have

00:13:30 on good authority, that he was one of the editors that came in with final revisions. But most of the

00:13:36 work was actually done by Tom Askell and one other gentleman, I forget his name. So it's not G3

00:13:42 statement. But G3 certainly was involved in it and stood behind it and signed it. And guess what?

00:13:47 I signed it. And I signed it with members of my church at the time, not appreciating that I signed

00:13:52 it. But it was true and a good statement. It's still true and still a good statement. And so all

00:13:58 that being said, the statement on social justice and the gospel a few years ago, they had the exact

00:14:05 same font for the title of their statement and the exact same color scheme as our statement has.

00:14:14 Now, so that being said, so that's true. It is exactly the same. That decision was made last

00:14:20 night as I was sleeping in bed with my wife. So I didn't make that decision. I didn't make that

00:14:27 call. I did some of the final revisions. I think the content of the statement is fantastic. I stand

00:14:34 behind it 100%. The choice to use the exact same font and color scheme as the statement on social

00:14:40 justice and the gospel, that was not my decision. If I had been consulted, which I'm not offended

00:14:46 that I wasn't, it's fine. I don't think it's some grievous, nefarious sin. But if I had been

00:14:50 consulted, I would have said, no, no, let's not do that. I think it's, you know, I just think it's

00:14:56 dumb. Um, I think it's tacky. I think it's unnecessarily muddies the waters or, you know, 0.95

00:15:02 just, it's just gonna, it's just gonna poke the bear unnecessarily. The bear has already been

00:15:06 poked. Um, I don't think we need to poke it anymore. Let's just not do that. Uh, that would

00:15:10 have been my decision. Now that said, I voiced that decision. Uh, but I found out that the,

00:15:15 the font and color scheme was exactly the same. I found out this morning, same as you. So I found

00:15:20 out as it was publicly posted, uh, same, same as everybody else. So I, you know, I didn't have any

00:15:24 inside information on that particular decision. Since I found out, along with everybody else,

00:15:30 I reached out to Dusty Devers and William Wolfe and other guys who were involved in writing the

00:15:36 statement and editing the statement, revising it, and said, hey, change the font. That's my vote.

00:15:42 Now, here's the thing. Here's the irony. The Christian Nationalists, despite popular opinion,

00:15:46 we actually don't hold to a Protestant Pope. Because we don't hold to a Protestant Pope,

00:15:52 and because i'm not the protestant pope i don't have executive power to just go ahead and make

00:15:57 that decision so it's a team effort um but i will say that william wolf and dusty devers and

00:16:03 everybody else on the team agrees so guess what we're going to change the font and again uh it

00:16:10 wasn't an accident that would be not uh that would be untruthful it wasn't an accident uh

00:16:14 william wolf and dusty devers said yeah we we did it intentionally because we think it looks great

00:16:19 and and and because we want to say yeah this is a statement just like that a statement that is

00:16:25 thoroughly biblical a statement that that heralds the gospel a statement um that that that is that

00:16:32 is clear and and and serious and i think the serious element was actually subtracted from

00:16:39 by by copying the font so i gave them my two cents and guess what they said you're right so we're

00:16:44 going to change the font i don't know when that's going to happen uh they may change it today that

00:16:48 was my vote. I said, Hey, I think as soon as possible, go ahead and change the font. We don't

00:16:52 need any more controversy than we already have. So go ahead and change the font. And they're either

00:16:58 going to change it today. I'm going to let them decide because I don't control them. I'm not the

00:17:02 Protestant Pope and they're good guys and I love them. And whatever the decision they make, it's

00:17:07 at the end of the day, it matters, but it's really not that big of a deal. It's really not. We can

00:17:11 all just calm down and uh and not be um i want to be charitable but um not not be so emotional 0.99

00:17:21 effeminate i think it's a little bit effeminate i do i think choosing the same font was stupid 0.97

00:17:28 so i'll say that i think the response to the choosing the same font was effeminate so my side 1.00

00:17:34 the decision, I'll be honest, it's stupid. The other side, their response, 0.99

00:17:44 a little bit effeminate, emotional. It's what I would expect from, you know, maybe a response from

00:17:51 unregenerate women. And so, yeah, I don't like either one. Don't like either one. So the font's 1.00

00:17:58 going to change, but I'm not in charge. So the team is going to figure it out. They'll change

00:18:02 it today, or they're making some revisions. Some of you guys have already gotten to us and reached

00:18:07 out and said, I love the statement, but this part I think could be shored up a little bit strengthened

00:18:11 here. So they may take a couple of days, make the revisions and then just, and then just republish

00:18:16 the statement once the revisions are made with the new font. So it'll be today, change of font

00:18:22 only, or it'll be a few days from now, change of font and the revisions. Either way, let's go ahead

00:18:27 and calm down. Uh, we got that out of the way. There you have it. Um, so let's actually deal

00:18:33 with the statement, uh, real quick before we do, do we have any, anything in the chat? The chat's

00:18:37 blown up a little bit. Do we have anything worthy of addressing? Ben Bowman says, but the font was

00:18:47 the only reason I agreed with the statement. Well, there you go. And then I guess in God's

00:18:51 providence, I'm glad I wouldn't have made the decision myself, but I'm glad that we went with

00:18:54 the font um all right uh what's that other one let's see just in case it should have never been

00:19:00 the same font it made something serious petty fair fine fine with that no you know i don't

00:19:08 have an argument not my decision it happened and so we're going to change it uh so if you view

00:19:16 the response to the font as petty which i do or you view the choice of the font from the christian

00:19:23 nationalist side as petty, which I also kind of do. I don't think it's quite as petty, but I,

00:19:27 yeah, I think it was foolish. I think it was stupid. Um, great. Okay. So we'll change the 1.00

00:19:32 font. Uh, let's go ahead and move on and read the statement at a certain point, right? So I

00:19:40 understand the initial, you know, reaction with me. I don't completely understand it, but I, you

00:19:44 know, within reason, I understand, but eventually what you're going to have to do, and this is what

00:19:48 I think some of our brothers at G3 don't really want to do is you're going to have to deal with

00:19:52 the content you're going to have to deal with the arguments and you're going to have to deal with

00:19:58 the scriptural backing for the arguments and i'll tell you this straight up front just giving you 0.95

00:20:04 a highlight of the of the statement um it is a full-fledged repudiation of any sinful ethnic

00:20:12 partiality so you won't get to play the race card anymore not with us now are there christian

00:20:19 nationalists that might be just straight up racist yeah i've seen a few i've seen a few

00:20:24 but if you're dealing with us if you're tagging us in your tweets if you're talking to us and us 0.65

00:20:34 being dusty deavers william wolf guys like ad robles guys like joel webin um if you're dealing

00:20:41 with us you're not going to be able to play the race card anymore that won't work that's why we

00:20:45 wrote the statement so that we could stop talking past each other and you guys have told us right

00:20:51 because we keep saying you're you're not understanding the position and you guys and

00:20:55 and justly so fairly so you said well then then you need to define your terms tell us what you

00:21:01 mean that's what the statement is that's why we got it out there so font not a great look not a

00:21:08 great look i mean it is a great look it's a great font way to go guys um but not a great look copying

00:21:14 the font so we'll change it but we're gonna have to move on we're gonna have to move on from the

00:21:20 font right pettiness on both sides okay we got but we're gonna have to we're gonna have to put

00:21:25 that aside get on our big boy pants and be men and deal with arguments substance content scripture 0.74

00:21:35 theology and i'm really hoping that by the grace of god that our brothers with g3 will do that

00:21:42 that they'll actually engage the arguments it's going to be tough though it's going to be tough

00:21:49 because um there is a full repudiation of racism a full repudiation of pragmatism

00:21:56 a full repudiation of legalism a clear distinction between law and gospel

00:22:02 uh it's it's going to be hard to pick apart but we've now defined the terms

00:22:10 and in g3's defense part of the reason why it was difficult to know our position is because a lot

00:22:16 of guys are underneath this banner of christian nationalism and we're not all in agreement we're

00:22:22 not all in agreement but the only reason i'm willing to wear the label at all as i've already

00:22:26 said is because when it comes down to it i am a christian and i'm not a globalist and i'm not a

00:22:34 tribalist and i believe that neutrality is a myth a misnomer that classical liberalism is not

00:22:41 the savior that it has failed us so color me a christian nationalist and if they're a racist

00:22:48 like bona fide legitimate racist not just natural affection you know whatever but like

00:22:54 genuine race racist that come underneath that banner it's still an appropriate label and so 0.86

00:23:00 I'm going to wear it. And then I'll just have to clarify from time to time. Well, no, I don't agree 0.80

00:23:05 with him. No, I don't agree with him. But the statement would hopefully put me and others on

00:23:10 our team in the position where we don't have to clarify like 12 times a day. I'm hoping that we

00:23:17 don't get more tweets saying, do you repudiate this random Twitter follower that no one knew

00:23:23 existed until I actually retweeted him for his racism. Well, I'm hoping that by doing the

00:23:30 statement, it could be kind of a one and done situation. And that's how I'm going to treat it

00:23:36 from now on. So next time somebody calls me to repudiate something, I'm just telling you right

00:23:40 now, I'm done with that. I have spoken. Read the statement. That's my position. So I'm not going

00:23:52 to kowtow every 15 minutes on Twitter or YouTube or anywhere else, especially to brothers

00:24:00 who should give the benefit of the doubt. They should give the benefit of the doubt. So

00:24:06 all that being said, there we have it. So we'll fix the font. Not my decision. I think it was a

00:24:12 little dumb, but let me say this, but it's not nefarious. I do not believe the decision to use

00:24:19 that particular font and that exact color scheme was sin. Sin in the proper sense, definitively,

00:24:29 objectively sinful. So we're not apologizing. I want to be clear about that. We are not apologizing.

00:24:35 I didn't even do it and I'm not apologizing. And William Wolfe is not going to apologize. I can

00:24:41 tell you that right now. Dusty Devers is not going to apologize. They're going to change the font.

00:24:45 they're going to change the font because it's been clearly voiced that it's not appreciated

00:24:51 and i can understand practically why um but see false repentance waters down true repentance

00:24:59 and it reminds me honestly it reminds me of of the trailer for by what standard

00:25:07 that founders did a few years back you remember when that trailer came out and everybody lost

00:25:12 their minds ever i mean grown men lost their minds hysterical in the sbc outside of the sbc

00:25:19 all this kind of stuff and when that happened um tom askell and jared longshore god bless both

00:25:27 those men forever they said we are not going to repent because we have a disdain for repentance

00:25:37 no because we love repentance and false repentance waters down and cheapens real repentance and you

00:25:47 cannot truly have real repentance for something that's not real sin the founder's trailer for the

00:25:57 by what standard doc was not sinful in fact in the province of god it played out to be prophetic

00:26:06 for lack of a better word rachel den hollander is a snake like did he just say a snake yeah i'll

00:26:15 say it again just in case you know just to tell you how deliberate those word wording is uh she's 0.99

00:26:21 a snake and the trailer made it look like maybe she might be a snake and she is a snake great

00:26:29 trailer great trailer and even if she wasn't it was not so i mean subliminal at most very subtle

00:26:41 it was not sin we don't repent of things that aren't sin now not everybody felt the same way

00:26:51 on the founders board if you remember that fiasco at the time about half of the board resigned and

00:26:59 they resigned um because they disagreed with tom and jared um of over whether or not uh the trailer

00:27:07 um whether or not it it merited the need for repentance tom and jared said hey we can switch

00:27:15 things we can switch some things up uh and you know we can we can correct some things

00:27:21 but we're not going to repent it is not sinful we were even willing to say that maybe it wasn't

00:27:26 the wisest decision that if we could do it over, we would have done it better. There's other ways

00:27:31 to do it. We're willing to say all that. We're not willing to call it sin because we can't call

00:27:36 it sin. We therefore cannot repent. And they lost half the board of founders. So let me be really

00:27:42 clear. The font with the statement, it wasn't my decision. I wouldn't have personally made the

00:27:50 decision and yet i'm not going to do what the founders board did i like william wolf i'm still

00:27:59 on his team i like dusty deavers i'm still on his team better than i like because that's cheap

00:28:05 i respect william wolf he's a godly man he's a godly man in fact me being on this team with

00:28:14 Guys like William Wolfe and guys like Dusty Devers, if anything, I'm out of my league.

00:28:19 If anything, they're better men than I am.

00:28:22 So no, I'm not embarrassed by them.

00:28:24 There's not a board for Christian nationalists.

00:28:26 And if there was, I would not be resigning.

00:28:29 I will not repent.

00:28:31 I will not even apologize.

00:28:33 And I certainly will not quit on my friends.

00:28:40 I'm not going to do what the Founders Board did.

00:28:42 when i say the founders board i mean half of it tom askell is a gem god bless him forever so

00:28:48 um that's my position on that we'll change the font but what you have to do whoever you are

00:28:56 whoever's listening now is you have to read and deal with the statement on its face you got to

00:29:04 deal with the content the substance and so we're going to go ahead and deal with some of that now

00:29:09 all right here we go the statement on christian nationalism and the gospel

00:29:14 this is a draft version that's the last thing that we should say there will be some final revisions

00:29:20 and we're actually going to probably hold a summit a two-day summit sometime lord willing

00:29:25 this summer 2023 in the summer maybe june or july uh for anyone who's interested in hearing the

00:29:31 statement hearing uh us publicly teach on the statement and uh and kind of uh draw out its

00:29:38 sense and its meaning, give some further teaching, instruction, explanation on each of the affirmations

00:29:44 and denials, and then call for those who are on board to sign the statement and to get more

00:29:52 signatures. So this is a draft version, and we will do the final version, likely do that after

00:30:00 the summit, an in-person summit sometime this summer. So draft version, we're going to start

00:30:08 with the definition and introduction, but I know I've already kept you in suspense. We're going to

00:30:13 do it in about 90 seconds because first we need a quick word from our sponsors. Mercy Meadows Ranch

00:30:19 is a family owned and operated cattle company producing top quality beef in central Texas.

00:30:25 Mercy Meadows Ranch serves families across the nation by supplying beef that is hormone,

00:30:30 antibiotic, and vaccine free. They ship bulk beef nationwide because they want to enable

00:30:37 families to take control over a major portion of their food supply. Their vision is to help create

00:30:44 a Christian-based parallel economy and community to become your trusted beef supplier in support

00:30:51 of a multi-generational family heritage. And because of their bulk beef deposit launch

00:30:58 taking place this summer, they are hosting a giveaway to stuff your family's freezer

00:31:03 with their grass-fed, grain-finished, beef-raised right on their ranch.

00:31:09 Now, to enter the giveaway, go to the link in the description and enter your email and you'll be all set.

00:31:16 Mercy Meadows Ranch. Check out their website, mercymeadowsranch.com.

00:31:21 With the banking industry and another tailspin, and the Fed ready to raise interest rates once again,

00:31:27 many of you are probably asking, when does this madness stop?

00:31:31 If you're interested in learning how to establish a family banking system outside of today's mainstream banking insanity, then schedule a call with our sponsors at Private Family Banking.

00:31:43 There's a way for individuals and families to put their hard-earned money to work continuously accruing compounding interest and have those resources available as collateral for cash or for financing investments, business, college, and other major life expenditures without going to the big banks for loans.

00:32:06 income tax protected safety from stock market losses guaranteed rates of compounding interest

00:32:14 and the ability to store up an inheritance for your children's children and avoid the death tax

00:32:21 on your estate if this interests you then email our friends at familybankingnow at gmail.com

00:32:30 to schedule a call. Again, that's familybankingnow at gmail.com. Send them an email today.

00:32:40 All right, here we go. This is the draft version of the statement on Christian nationalism and

00:32:44 the gospel. It starts with this definition. Christian nationalism is a set of governing

00:32:49 principles rooted in scripture's teaching on Christ's rule as supreme Lord and King of all

00:32:55 creation who has ordained civil magistrates with delegated authority to be under him over the

00:33:01 people to order their ordained jurisdiction by punishing evil and promoting good for his own

00:33:08 glory that is god's own glory and the common good of the nation lots of scripture cited i'm not going

00:33:14 to do the scripture for each one because it'll take forever but pull up the statement you can go

00:33:18 to statement on christian nationalism.com statement on christian nationalism.com you'll

00:33:27 be able to read the statement yourself and see all the scripture citation next so that's definition

00:33:31 introduction while christian nationalism is primarily concerned with the righteous rule

00:33:37 of the civil magistrate christian nationalism is not just for magistrates just as submitting

00:33:43 to christ lordship is not just for magistrates but for all people after the lord jesus declares

00:33:49 his sovereign authority in matthew 28 18 he gives the great commission and commands his followers

00:33:55 empowered by his everlasting presence to make disciples of all nations and to baptize them

00:34:01 and teach them to obey all that i have commanded that's matthew 28 19 and 20 our lord did not

00:34:09 exclude all civil authorities devoted allegiance to him he did not exclude their devoted allegiance

00:34:16 to him we recognize the existence of other definitions of christian nationalism we certainly

00:34:22 do not endorse every iteration of christian nationalism and explicitly repudiate some such

00:34:28 forms as will be evident in our affirmations and denials you may sign this document and delineate

00:34:35 if you affirm civil authorities legislating both tables of the law,

00:34:40 first and second table of the Decalogue, the Ten Commandments.

00:34:43 I'll explain this part.

00:34:44 Or you can sign it designating that you are only adhering to,

00:34:49 only in support of Christian nationalism as it pertains to the second table of the law.

00:34:56 So let me read that again.

00:34:56 You may sign this document and delineate if you affirm civil authorities legislating

00:35:03 of both tables of the law or only the second table of the law at the end of the article what do we

00:35:09 mean by that the decalogue exodus 20 10 commandments first table of the law would be commandments one

00:35:15 through four uh that pertain um the best way we could sum that up is our duty our obligation to

00:35:21 love the lord our god with all our heart with all our soul and with all our mind right the first

00:35:26 commandment have no other gods before me forbidding idolatry do not make any graven images do not take

00:35:32 the Lord's name in vain, right? So that would be banning blasphemy. And then remember the Sabbath

00:35:37 and keep it holy. So some Christian nationalists, myself, I would be one of them. Remember, I'm a

00:35:42 general equity theonomist guy, post-millennial guy, Kyperian guy, presuppositional guy. So I

00:35:47 very much am in favor of all Ten Commandments. And not just all Ten Commandments in terms of,

00:35:54 well, Christians are obligated to obey these Ten Commandments. No, I believe that God gives,

00:35:58 this is the key on what basis does god give his law god does not give his law to on the basis of

00:36:07 him being savior of some rather god gives his law to humanity on the basis of him being creator of

00:36:15 all say that again god does not issue his law as a moral obligation to his creatures on the basis

00:36:23 of him being savior of some but on the basis of him being universal creator of all therefore the

00:36:32 law of god is not merely given to christian people but it is given by god and morally obligatory

00:36:39 to all people all people and that would be all of his law so it's not some of the law for some

00:36:47 people or all the law for some people or some of the law for all people it's all of god's word

00:36:54 to all people all of god's word to all people that said part of the intention in this project

00:37:01 this movement for lack of a better term this big tent pan protestant christian nationalism

00:37:08 is recognizing that not everybody's going to be a post-mill theonomist

00:37:11 but we want to get as many people on board as possible so there is a delineation an option

00:37:20 to say you know what i agree with everything in the statement except when it comes to what the

00:37:25 state should legislate for a nation i think it should be the second table of the law second

00:37:31 table of the law commandments five through ten pertaining to our love for neighbor right so

00:37:35 loving god commandments one through four first table of the law uh and then loving neighbor as

00:37:41 yourself that would be commandments number five through ten second table of the law and so we left

00:37:46 the option the option because we want to have a big tent we want to be successful we want to win

00:37:52 we want the nation to turn back to jesus we we want to see repentance we we want to see um 0.98

00:38:00 transgenderism and and lesbianism and uh sodomy and homosexuality and and you know all this 1.00

00:38:08 madness and abortion uh we want to see it stop we want to see it stop and we know that uh that 0.93

00:38:14 practically speaking we need numbers we can't afford i i'm not interested in storming the

00:38:20 gates of hell with 14 people i'm not interested in storming the gates of hell with perfect theology

00:38:28 but 14 people and i know that i don't have perfect theology but you with my theology that i think is

00:38:35 right otherwise i wouldn't hold it but with only 14 other people that agree with me rather i would

00:38:40 i would rather make not compromises but tactical biblically permissible concessions so guys who

00:38:48 signed second table only do i in the objective theological sense disagree with them and think

00:38:53 they're wrong therefore yes because we're not relative to this somebody's right somebody's

00:38:59 wrong. But we're trying to be as ecumenical in all the right ways and all the ways that we can

00:39:05 without compromise as possible. And there are going to be some faithful Christians that do not 0.88

00:39:09 think the nation, that the civil magistrate should have the authority to legislate 0.84

00:39:13 Sabbatarian laws. I think they're wrong about that. Not just from scripture, but even in our

00:39:20 own American history, they're wrong about that. We've done it before. We've done it in recent

00:39:25 history in this nation before. But if they're saying, yeah, but I'll storm the gates of hell

00:39:31 on every other item in your statement, then welcome brother, come along, come along. So

00:39:38 let me keep going. Um, we are honored to receive signatures now. If you affirm the statement as

00:39:47 it currently stands, we do not accept anonymous signatures, right? You're going to have to sign

00:39:52 your name. In July, we will host an editorial summit to discuss any necessary amendments

00:39:58 followed the next day by a conference. Details forthcoming. But if you feel like, hey, I can get

00:40:05 behind the statement now, then sign it. If you feel like, ah, no, I'd like to see a couple revisions

00:40:08 first, but this is a good start. This is a good start. Then don't sign it, but help us get the

00:40:14 word out there. Share it. Share it on your social media and say, I'm not signing yet. I've got a few

00:40:17 reservations, but I think that this is a step in the right direction. It repudiates racism,

00:40:22 but it also repudiates antinomianism and pietism and says that christians should care about christian

00:40:28 culture that's what we need right now that's what we need right now so if you can say hey i can't

00:40:33 quite sign it but i like where this is going i see some good potential and i'm glad that you guys are

00:40:39 not just talking past one another any longer but that you're defining your terms this is a good

00:40:43 endeavor change the font but the substance way to go then help us out you don't have to sign

00:40:50 that's between you and the lord and your conscience um you also don't have to share that's between you

00:40:55 and the lord and your conscience also but if you can't sign but are willing to share please get it

00:41:00 out there share the statement here we go um the authors james silberman dusty deavers those are

00:41:07 the two main guys and then contributing editors would be william wolf joel webin jeff wright

00:41:13 Corey Anderson and Ben Woodring. We affirm and deny. Here we go. So now affirmations and denials,

00:41:21 and that's the rest of the statement. It's just 21 affirmations and denials. We affirm and deny

00:41:25 the following propositions. Number one, the source of truth. We affirm that the Bible is God's word

00:41:31 breathed out by him as the only sufficient, certain, inerrant, infallible, necessary,

00:41:37 and final authority for all saving knowledge faith what we must believe and obedience how we

00:41:43 must live all truth claims and ethical standards must be tested by god's final word which is

00:41:50 scripture alone we affirm that the bible is um clear perspicuity of scripture is i always joked

00:41:57 that perspicuity uh is a very unclear word that means clarity so uh so let me let me read it like

00:42:04 that just so that that i don't lose anybody there but um all truth claims and ethical standards must

00:42:09 be tested by god's final word which is scripture alone we affirm that the bible is clear in all

00:42:14 essential matters and we think christian ethics is one of those matters not just salvation

00:42:19 but how we should live right the bible is breathed out by god all scripture is is inspired and

00:42:28 breathed out by god useful for training and and and it's it's it's clear and and infallible to

00:42:36 what end to just showing you how to get to heaven salvation exclusively no for all life and godliness

00:42:43 here's the thing about that word life life is a a pretty wide umbrella a lot of stuff falls

00:42:53 underneath that category of life like civil life christian ethics in life so we believe that that's

00:43:03 one of the things in scripture that is clear we deny that true beliefs good character or good

00:43:11 conduct can be dictated by any authority other than god's revelation so what we're saying right

00:43:17 here from the very beginning and then there's scripture every single affirmation denial is

00:43:20 going to have scriptural proofs so what do we mean by we deny well then the civil magistrate can't do

00:43:26 it no no all authority parents in the home right that's the sphere of the family pastors elders

00:43:33 in the church that's the ecclesiastical sphere and civil magistrates in the civil sphere the

00:43:39 sphere of the state they can tell people what to do they can but all authority is vested authority

00:43:45 They can only tell people what to do insofar as it's in line with the ultimate authority,

00:43:51 which is God's word.

00:43:52 So we're saying we deny that true beliefs, good character, or good conduct can be dictated

00:43:56 in an autonomous sense by strictly just because of the person's position.

00:44:04 Well, I'm a governor.

00:44:05 Therefore, I can shut down churches during COVID.

00:44:08 No, no, it doesn't matter.

00:44:11 The position, all authority is vested authority.

00:44:14 there's no inherent human authority all human authority is vested authority in all three

00:44:20 spheres in the home parents have vested authority not inherent authority vested authority by god

00:44:25 they have jurisdictions with their children in the church pastors have jurisdictions vested

00:44:32 authority by god it's you you only can go as far as the word of god allows you to go so we deny

00:44:36 that true beliefs good character or good conduct can be dictated by any authority other than god's

00:44:41 revelation. So human authorities can dictate these things like good conduct, but only insofar

00:44:46 as it lines up with scripture. All right, here we go. Number two, orthodox Christian faith. We

00:44:51 affirm the orthodox Christian faith. So here we're trying to define a little bit, right? So

00:44:55 Christian nationalism, well, first word that needs to be defined as Christian, right? Which Christians, 0.67

00:45:01 a lot of people claim to be Christians, which Christians are included in this project? We

00:45:06 affirm the orthodox christian faith as defined by the historic creeds e.g apostles creed nicene

00:45:12 creed athanasius creed which the christian church throughout church history has universally

00:45:17 affirmed we deny that orthodoxy is defined by any particular confessions what do we mean by that

00:45:24 what we're saying is that when we argue for a christian nation we are not arguing for any form

00:45:31 of denominationalism we're arguing for a christian nation not a presbyterian nation not an anglican

00:45:39 nation not an episcopalian nation i don't even know if episcopalians would argue for that

00:45:44 themselves not a baptist nation not a calvinist nation i think it's right no a christian nation

00:45:52 so so you have to set the parameters of of how narrow but also how broad so christian means uh 0.99

00:46:01 we, um, we are not interested in having a Muslim nation. We are not interested. I believe it's 1.00

00:46:07 Minneapolis that now has a citywide audible, public audible call to Muslim prayer, Islamic prayer.

00:46:17 No, America is not an Islamic nation. No, no. And we're also, we are, we are not, um, uh, Islam.

00:46:26 no judaism no judy islam is a christian heresy judaism is also a christian heresy 0.79

00:46:36 atheism is a religion and it is a false religion hinduism is a false religion secularism is a 0.96

00:46:44 false religion so christian so how narrow well christian that's how narrow it's not muslim it's 0.91

00:46:50 not hindu it's not atheist but how broad right setting the parameters here how broad well um

00:46:58 it's not denominational not setting it by confessions like the westminster which is

00:47:04 strictly presbyterian or the 1689 which is strictly baptist not confessions that belong

00:47:11 to individual denominations or strains of christian theology and tradition but rather

00:47:17 creeds so we're arguing for a creedal a creedal christian nationalism and the creeds have been

00:47:27 universally the three that we're mentioning by name apostles nicene and athanasius have been

00:47:32 universally affirmed by the christian church for approximately 2 000 years of church history

00:47:38 give or take the first three or four hundred years when they were still sorting things out

00:47:41 for a long time is the point and it's been affirmed these creeds by across the board

00:47:47 of all different kinds of denominations so that's what we're saying pan-protestant

00:47:53 big tent christian not presbyterian or baptist but christian and how do you define christian

00:48:01 will you say orthodoxy but then you have to ask the question begs the question how do you define

00:48:05 orthodoxy what is christian orthodoxy creedal not confessional creedal not confessional

00:48:11 so can you get behind the apostles creed okay great yeah we want a nation that affirms the

00:48:19 apostles creed that's what we want at a public level that not just the church and not just

00:48:25 christians privately in their homes but that the state that caesar himself the civil magistrate

00:48:32 that they publicly declare allegiance not just to um a god not not not a mere ambiguous theism

00:48:41 but they pledge their allegiance to the triune god the christian god and that they would be able

00:48:48 to affirm the civil magistrate publicly affirm the apostles creed in christian orthodoxy that's

00:48:56 what we mean by that okay the orthodox christian faith that was number two number three the standard

00:49:02 of justice. We affirm that God's word is authoritative on everything to which it speaks

00:49:07 and we affirm that God's word speaks abundantly regarding the nature and importance of civil

00:49:12 government and justice. We affirm that God's moral law is enduring and binding on all people

00:49:17 including civil magistrates and nations throughout all time and that it is that it is comprehended

00:49:24 summarized and comprehended in the 10 commandments. We further affirm that every political thought

00:49:30 must be taken captive to the obedience of christ amen we deny that there is any objective standard

00:49:37 by which to discern justice from injustice outside of god's revelation written on the heart of the

00:49:44 most perfect written on the heart and most perfectly revealed in scripture we deny that

00:49:51 governing officials may rule autonomously apart from the rule of christ and we deny that christians

00:49:57 may embrace any political ideology or position that is not rooted in scripture see that's part

00:50:04 of the problem with evangelicals for decades now we've said well hey there's there's religion

00:50:08 and then there's politics and you know what you know christians shouldn't bind the conscience

00:50:14 nine marks oh my goodness this makes me livid nine marks you know everybody's hopping on the

00:50:21 train you know they saw hey g3 is going after a christian nationalist and g3 looks like they

00:50:26 they're, they're relevant and nine marks. Nobody even knows who we are. Cause we shot

00:50:29 ourself in the foot three years ago with COVID, but we'd like to be relevant again. So maybe we'll

00:50:33 jump on the train of bashing Christian nationalists. And then they wrote an article

00:50:37 that I'm pretty sure they, they, I'm pretty sure they stole it and plagiarized it from,

00:50:43 from the gospel coalition. Cause that's what it reads like. They literally said,

00:50:48 they literally said that a Christian in a local church, you know, that we shouldn't judge about 0.96

00:50:52 this or that with political affiliations because a christian might vote democrat for a baby killer

00:50:57 a pro-abortion democrat because they have concerns about human life when it comes to climate change

00:51:05 that is not hyperbole i paraphrased but that is not hyperbole that that is literally what was said

00:51:12 in a nine marks article like i think two or three days ago

00:51:18 as nine marches we want to be cool too nobody cares what we have to say because

00:51:24 we we kowtowed

00:51:28 but but oh there's something cool happening again and evangelicalism we want it we want to see it

00:51:35 at the table and so we'll write an article about christian nationalism and and and then they say

00:51:40 one of the reasons we disagree with christian nationalism is because you know christians should

00:51:44 be able to agree to disagree on politics okay great give me an example the example like we 0.58

00:51:49 could agree to disagree on whether or not we should vote for baby murderers

00:51:53 like i've come to expect that from tim keller and the gospel coalition and now i guess i'm mad

00:52:05 because because i love these guys i i love nine marks and now nine marks is just

00:52:13 just the gospel coalition disgusting and disgusting is the proper word disgusting

00:52:20 so all that being said uh we deny that there is any where where was i

00:52:27 let's see we affirm that god's moral law is enduring and binding on all people including

00:52:33 civil magistrates and nations throughout all time and that is uh summarized comprehended in

00:52:39 the 10 commandments we further affirm that every political thought must be taken captive to the

00:52:43 obedience of christ we deny that there is any objective standard by which to discern justice

00:52:47 or injustice or justice from injustice outside of the bible god's revelation which is written on the

00:52:54 heart but also most perfectly revealed in scripture special revelation we deny that governing officials

00:53:00 may rule autonomously apart from the rule of christ and we deny that christians may embrace

00:53:05 any political ideology or position not rooted in scripture what we're saying in that is back to the

00:53:10 perspicuity of scripture, the clarity of scripture, that scripture is clear, not just on eternal

00:53:15 things or the way of salvation, but the scripture is also clear on civil ethics. And the scripture

00:53:21 therefore is clear that certain things that we like to say are merely political, that these

00:53:29 things are deeply theological as well. Scripture speaks to whether or not you can vote for a baby

00:53:35 murderer it does and scripture also speaks to whether or not you can vote for a thief aka 0.94

00:53:43 aoc bernie sanders socialism so we're saying no no no it's not a theology we need to get that

00:53:52 straight but politics is up for grabs no we're saying scripture speaks to politics and it binds

00:53:56 the conscience there are certain political ideologies that are actually antagonistic to

00:54:02 scripture and you cannot support them let's keep going this is number four now the definition of

00:54:08 a nation all right this is a big one we affirm that a nation is not merely an idea abstract

00:54:15 principle or ideology but tangibly defined it's not just america is an idea the american dream no

00:54:22 people in place it's tangible it's physical tangibly defined by a particular people in

00:54:30 a particular place. We affirm that a particular people are necessarily bound together by both a

00:54:36 shared culture and history and may be comprised of multiple ethnicities while sharing, right? So

00:54:43 you can be black, right? Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight.

00:54:47 You can be different ethnicities. You can be black, you can be white, you can be Latino,

00:54:52 but shared history, shared culture, and shared culture and history and may be comprised of

00:54:59 multiple ethnicities while sharing common interests, virtues, languages, and worship.

00:55:06 We affirm in regards to place that a nation is definitively set by both its borders and its times,

00:55:13 physically, literally, tangibly, physically defined by God. That's Acts 17 verse 26. It says

00:55:19 that God appoints, he sets the time period of nations, when they rise, when they fall,

00:55:25 and he sets their borders nations are not ideas they're not principles they're not dreams it's

00:55:31 not abstract they are places with people particular people and a particular place those people don't

00:55:37 have to look the same but they do have to have a common shared culture and history and interest 0.98

00:55:45 and virtues and worship we want we want america to be christian we don't want it to be white

00:55:52 we want it to be christian we we want that to be held in common by all okay

00:56:01 thusly we affirm that nations should rightly maintain autonomous government and sovereign

00:56:09 control of their people and place with the necessary rights and duties to number one

00:56:15 prioritize the safety prosperity and well-being of their defined limited national citizenry

00:56:22 first and foremost before seeking the good of non-citizens and the global population so number

00:56:29 one so nations are god's god's idea he sets their times and borders it's physical not just a

00:56:35 principle it's not just ideology it's tangible it's a people an actual people flesh and blood

00:56:42 in an actual place um and and the civil magistrates they have three duties that i'm

00:56:48 going to spell out here number one they have a duty to work towards the physical welfare

00:56:53 and prosperity and blessing of the citizens of their nation and not illegal immigrants

00:56:59 who are not citizens but the citizens of their nation and also not other nations

00:57:06 so let me just give you a real you know practical example 0.59

00:57:10 um our leaders should care more about americans than ukraine

00:57:16 and our leaders should not be taxing americans and using their hard-earned tax dollars 0.72

00:57:24 to to support um illegal immigrants who have broken the law and come into our our nation illegally

00:57:33 so we're saying uh christian nationalism it's not a white mono ethnic nationalism

00:57:41 but it is america first it is america first and christian nationalism that is not just about it's

00:57:48 not only for america any other nation can be a christian nationalist if you're in zambia and you

00:57:52 want zambia to be a christian nation then it needs to be zambia first that nations have a duty in the

00:57:58 civil magistrate of a particular nation has a a hierarchy of of priority and their first priority

00:58:06 is not to the other side of the world but to their own citizens to their own citizens so let's keep

00:58:12 going here that was number one in terms of their their duties civil magistrates the government of

00:58:21 a sovereign nation their duties is number one prioritize their people number two secure their

00:58:27 borders and number three punish evil within their sovereign territory so domestic evil those who are

00:58:35 within their borders who commit crimes. And number four, establish a necessary defense against

00:58:41 potential foreign evil. That's what the civil magistrate does. We're lining it out and saying

00:58:48 what, biblically speaking, Romans 13 is cited for this, multiple different texts.

00:58:53 Biblically speaking, what does the civil magistrate exist for? What are its roles,

00:58:58 its responsibilities its duties as designated by god it punishes evil and praises the good

00:59:07 do they do public schools nope they don't welfare nope they don't punish evil and not just punish

00:59:19 evil but praise the good in terms of punishing evil that's the big one right god gave them the

00:59:24 sword and not in vain they are god's avengers on the evildoer what does it mean to punish evil

00:59:29 well and to protect your citizens to protect the innocent what it means is that you have to have

00:59:36 borders and you need to police them what it means is you need to work towards the prosperity and

00:59:41 blessing of your nation's citizens what it means is that you punish evil domestically within your

00:59:47 borders you also mount a necessary defense for any potential foreign evil right that would speak

00:59:55 to a military being defended against foreign evil that might seek to do harm to your citizens

01:00:01 so you're punishing domestic evil that would be criminals within your borders mounting a

01:00:06 necessary whatever necessary defense is needed in order to to ward off potential foreign evil

01:00:14 doers and then policing your own borders and and not not being a globalist and serving other 0.83

01:00:22 countries at the expense of your own citizens and not serving illegal immigrants at the expense

01:00:27 of your legal citizens so that's number one number two secure their borders that just really goes in 0.73

01:00:33 with number one number three punish evil within their sovereign territory number four establish

01:00:39 a necessary defense against potential foreign adversaries evildoers so we've covered that

01:00:44 here's the denial we deny that a nation should cede its sovereignty to international bodies that

01:00:49 may subvert the will of the national interest for a global order we deny any efforts to establish a

01:00:57 one world governmental system before the return of christ as such efforts are a modern day as such

01:01:06 efforts are a modern day reenactment of the tower of babel so we repudiate that we further deny that

01:01:13 sovereign nations must be composed of mono-ethnic populations to be united under god therefore as

01:01:21 christian nationalists we utterly repudiate sinful ethnic partiality in all its various forms we

01:01:29 repudiate sinful ethnic partiality in all its various forms we must be united common interests

01:01:35 virtues religion worship shared history shared culture all those kinds of things we don't have

01:01:43 to have the same skin pigment in order to be united in that way so it doesn't have to be

01:01:47 mono-ethnic it can be diverse in terms of ethnicities within a sovereign nation but we

01:01:54 are not globalist we're not globalist we deny any efforts to establish a one world order which

01:02:02 is really just a reenactment of the tower of babel all right let's go on this is number five

01:02:09 We affirm that in addition to possessing the titles of Savior, Messiah, and many others,

01:02:16 Jesus, the Son of God, who is truly God, is also the King of all earthly kings,

01:02:21 the Lord of all earthly lords, and the lawmaker for all earthly lawmakers.

01:02:26 He is the possessor of all authority in heaven and on earth.

01:02:31 We affirm that as God, Jesus Christ is preeminent over all creation,

01:02:36 sovereignly rules over all things visible and invisible in heaven earth and hell and ordains

01:02:43 all things according to the counsel of his perfect will for the good of those who are in him

01:02:49 in his mediatorial role or rule rather christ rules by his spirit and word through earthly

01:02:58 authority which he has which he divinely has ordained to execute his will on the earth to

01:03:04 orient humankind toward himself we affirm that christ alone through the blood of his cross

01:03:11 grants repentance and forgiveness of sins to reconcile sinners to his father here's the denial

01:03:18 we deny any theology which would seek to segregate sacred aspects of life where god's word is

01:03:27 authoritative and supposedly secular aspects of life where the christian must operate by a standard

01:03:34 other than god's word we deny any theology which claims that bringing god's word into the civil

01:03:40 sphere is unwise or unfruitful or sinful or anything other than fitting and required we

01:03:48 deny that jesus kingship and lordship are merely heavenly or that his word is only authoritative

01:03:55 over confessing christians that's what i kind of started all this way his word his law word is

01:04:02 given not on the basis of being savior of christian people but on the basis of him being

01:04:08 universal creator of all people so we deny any theology that would try to segregate divorce

01:04:15 sacred at uh sacred aspects of life where god's word is authoritative and then supposedly secular

01:04:23 realms of life where christian a christian must operate by some other standard other than god's

01:04:30 word we also deny any theology that claims that bringing god's word into the civil sphere is

01:04:35 unwise unfruitful sinful or anything other than fitting and required we must bring his word into

01:04:42 the civil sphere and we deny that jesus kingship and lordship are merely heavenly or that his word

01:04:49 is only given to christian people rather than all people his kingship and lordship is also it's

01:04:55 heavenly and earthly and his word is given not only to christian people but all people that's

01:04:59 number five number six the identity of civil off officials and the source of their authority we

01:05:06 affirm that the civil officials are god's deacons of justice therefore they must obey his commands

01:05:12 and rule under his authority we affirm that all human authorities including civil officials

01:05:18 possess authority only as it has been delegated to them by god and accordingly are accountable

01:05:24 to him for how they wield their delegated authority in accordance with god's prescriptions for civil

01:05:30 government as revealed in his word we deny the authority of civil officials and documents to

01:05:37 contradict what god has said in his word or to govern beyond the bounds of god's word has

01:05:44 established for them number seven the duty of civil authorities we affirm that god has armed

01:05:51 civil magistrates with the sword of justice to promote citizens welfare without partiality

01:05:57 number one by writing and enforcing just laws as god defines justice which are a terror to those

01:06:05 who do evil as god defines evil number two by defending and approving those who do good

01:06:11 as god defines good and number three by avenging victims of crimes with proportional punishments

01:06:18 for evildoers eye for an eye tooth for a tooth life for a life we affirm that civil authorities

01:06:25 must ensure that the church shall enjoy the full free and unquestioned liberty of distort

01:06:31 just discharging every part of their sacred functions without violence or danger the civil

01:06:37 authorities must discharge this duty without showing favoritism to or biased against any

01:06:43 Christian any particular Christian denomination for their historic beliefs and teachings this

01:06:50 includes but is not limited to their teachings and beliefs concerning the immutability of biological

01:06:55 sex the union of marriage as existing solely between one man and one woman and other historic

01:07:02 Christian teachings on sexual morality we affirm that the government has the right to intervene

01:07:07 to prevent or stop any ceremonial religious practices that violate the natural law and

01:07:14 welfare of mankind including but not limited to child sacrifice polygamy child sexual exploitation

01:07:21 acts of religious masochism and so forth we're saying that the state actually has an obligation

01:07:28 it has an obligation to believe on these issues what the bible says that there are two genders

01:07:35 not 86 and that the state must operate in such a way to protect the freedom of the church

01:07:44 that the church can be the church and it should do so without partiality to any particular

01:07:49 denomination the state and we're arguing for a christian nation so we believe that america

01:07:54 should be a christian nation and as such that the civil magistrate in america should absolutely

01:08:00 prioritize the christian faith and give partiality special treatment to the christian faith over false

01:08:09 religions but not partiality within the christian faith within christian orthodoxy which is defined

01:08:14 at the beginning of the document in regards to particular christian denominations okay

01:08:19 we deny that civil authorities are tasked with being the primary caretakers of citizens or

01:08:28 educators of children no nanny state as these duties belong primarily to families and the

01:08:35 church we deny that the civil government should endeavor to take on these responsibilities

01:08:40 and we deny that they do so to the benefit of society rather such charity charity in quotations

01:08:48 marks because it's rarely charitable it rather charity displaces families by creating a culture

01:08:56 of dependence upon a nanny state and its education often debauches children with godless philosophies

01:09:04 and perverse instruction we deny that in scripture god ever approves of tolerance towards depravity 0.63

01:09:10 like child sacrifice and mutilation and drag queen story hour we would follow our king and he does

01:09:18 no such thing that's a good one number eight the purpose of civil government we affirm that god's

01:09:25 purpose for civil government is to orient citizens toward the true and eternal through the

01:09:30 establishment of justice for his glory and the good of his image bears, whether or not they

01:09:35 possess saving faith. We affirm that unjust laws, for example, those which permit child sacrifice

01:09:42 often debauch a people and that just laws often have an evangelistic impact. All right.

01:09:49 i'm gonna have to clarify a little bit here it's in the statement i'll keep reading but we do

01:09:57 believe the civil magistrate has an evangelistic effect an evangelistic effect because the civil

01:10:03 magistrate is not called to gospel ministry and the gospel is the only power of god for salvation

01:10:09 to all who believe first for the jew then for the greek the civil magistrate does not save

01:10:14 and the law does not save even just right biblical laws do not save no man will be saved by works as

01:10:20 done unto the law the gospel of free grace which is by grace alone through faith alone in christ

01:10:27 alone is the only power of god to save yet the civil magistrate in its duty to legislate righteous

01:10:35 laws that accurately reflect god's justice as the bible defines it it does have an evangelist

01:10:43 effect in the sense that there is the law functions as a tutor and when we have just laws

01:10:49 there is a discipleship element where just laws actually shape a people to recognize if you have

01:10:57 just laws it accurately reflects god's justice and in accurately reflecting god's justice it

01:11:03 reveals our sinfulness and therefore drives us to christ shows us our need for a savior

01:11:10 Charles Spurgeon said a man cannot appreciate the beauty of Christ unless he first comes to see the

01:11:15 necessity for Christ and the way we see the necessity for Christ this is the first use of

01:11:20 the law that the law functions as a mirror it reveals to us the holiness of God and therefore

01:11:25 by way of consequence it reflects to us the sinfulness of man the the infinite chasm in

01:11:30 between and therefore our desperate need for Christ and in so far as the civil magistrate

01:11:35 upholds biblical just laws it then accurately reflects the true holy nature of the triune god

01:11:41 in such a way that man can better see his own sinfulness and need for the law which saves the

01:11:49 state which saves no the gospel of jesus christ which saves we deny that the purpose of civil

01:11:55 government is to establish a secular neutral godless order and we deny that any government

01:12:01 is capable of neutrality because every individual and system has moral preferences and functional

01:12:08 gods for example ultimate allegiances and ultimate standards by which they judge reality

01:12:15 we further deny that natural law is a standard different or apart from god's moral and universal

01:12:22 law which is summarized and comprehended in the ten commandments natural so what we're saying

01:12:28 right there is that natural law is synonymous with moral law, which Stephen Wolf, in his

01:12:35 articulation, the case for Christian nationalism, he would agree on that point as well. So natural

01:12:41 law is not something less than the Ten Commandments. The natural law written on the hearts

01:12:46 of men is the moral law of God as expressed in the scripture. Okay. Number nine, sphere

01:12:56 sovereignty we affirm that god has established spheres spheres of authority such as the home

01:13:01 or family to include oneself and individual conscience and household economics the church

01:13:08 and the state we affirm that god has given unique responsibilities and instructions to authorities

01:13:14 within each sphere authorities in each sphere are subject to the rule of christ each retaining

01:13:21 sovereignty over its own sphere while being checked and balanced by the other two parents

01:13:27 as the authority in the home wield the rod for the purposes of instruction training and discipline

01:13:34 in wisdom and righteousness the church wields the keys of the kingdom for the binding and loosing

01:13:40 of gospel professions and god's word in preaching the law and gospel for conversion sanctification

01:13:47 and discipleship. And the state wields the sword as God's servants to maintain justice and civil

01:13:54 order by punishing evildoers, avenging the innocent, commending the good, and ensuring 0.64

01:14:00 that wholesome societal conditions are righteously upheld so that all men may lead a quiet and

01:14:06 peaceful life in all godliness and honesty. We affirm that Jesus Christ has appointed over his

01:14:14 church both government and discipline and no law of any government should interfere or hinder

01:14:20 the due exercise thereof among the voluntary members of any denomination of christians

01:14:27 according to their own profession and belief we deny that human authority in any sphere

01:14:34 possesses absolute or unchecked authority even within their sphere all human authority is vested

01:14:41 authority not inherent so we deny that human authority in any sphere church home or state

01:14:48 possesses absolute or unchecked authority even within their designated sphere as christ delegates

01:14:55 all human authority therefore all are accountable to christ and his moral law we further we deny

01:15:02 that civil authorities may assume to themselves the administration of the word and sacraments

01:15:08 or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven but must be uniquely protective of the free

01:15:14 exercise of the christian faith according to the dictates of conscience under the orthodox christian

01:15:21 faith so the civil magistrate can't serve the sacraments or the word or the power of the keys

01:15:28 of the kingdom of heaven but it does have an obligation a moral obligation under god to

01:15:36 protect the free exercise of christians not muslims but christians and the christian church

01:15:43 according to the dictates of conscience under the orthodox christian faith not a presbyterian

01:15:50 state not a baptist state but you bet you by golly a christian state number 10 on nationalism

01:15:58 and policy priorities we affirm that nations possess the inviolable right to establish justice

01:16:06 and safeguard the peace and prosperity of their own citizens in the face of unjust international

01:16:12 pressures we affirm that the specific short-term priorities of christian nationalism in the

01:16:17 context of the united states are repentance and faith which lead to the abolition of abortion

01:16:23 placing parents in control of education caring for widows and orphans and de-weaponizing the

01:16:29 federal and state bureaucracies i love this part de-weaponizing the federal and state

01:16:36 bureaucracies which target christians for censorship and persecution securing our borders

01:16:44 recapturing our national sovereignty from godless global entities who present a grave threat to

01:16:50 civilization such as the united nations the world health organization and the world economic forum

01:16:57 etc and exercising far more restraint in american international military intervention

01:17:05 and adventurism in overseas democracy building far more restraint we affirm that different forms

01:17:14 of government can achieve just laws and we do not seek to coerce other nations into one

01:17:20 particular form of government so what that's saying is get rid of the united nations get rid

01:17:26 of the wef the world economic forum the world health organization what a joke that's been um

01:17:32 no we also you get rid of the fbi while we're at it just saying um that that's what it's talking

01:17:43 about. And let's stop this global empirical export of our sacred democracy. You can have a

01:17:52 monarchy. I'm not arguing for it here. I don't think it's the best form of government. But

01:17:58 biblically speaking, we're Christians and we need to be a Christian nation. And if we're a Christian

01:18:03 nation, then the goal is not to export democracy to other nations. No, it's to export the gospel

01:18:11 to other nations by sending missionaries not by sending military right so we're not necessarily

01:18:17 saying that we need to be full-fledged isolationist but we certainly do not need to be the the global 0.96

01:18:23 globalistic imperialistic um homo jihad empire that we've been for the last few decades 0.93

01:18:31 definitely don't need to do that and we don't need to go into nations and and export democracy

01:18:38 we can send missionaries into nations to export the gospel and discipleship and as people are

01:18:46 saved by the preaching of the gospel and discipled in god's word including his law and his moral

01:18:51 obligations for civil magistrates in that nation then they can be a christian nation too and not

01:18:57 all of them will be a christian nation that's a constitutional republic i'm a bit partial to that

01:19:02 one. I think it's a good form of government. But we may have some Christian nations that

01:19:07 have a Christian prince that are a monarchy, but Christian. The goal is not to export democracy 0.92

01:19:14 in third world countries. The goal is to put America first as Americans and every other

01:19:24 Christian nation to put their citizens first and to be Christian, be Christian. We deny, 1.00

01:19:29 here we go uh we deny that seeking to maintain and assert national sovereignty against wicked

01:19:35 global entities has anything to do with dislike for any particular race or not or nation we deny

01:19:43 that the sin of racism has any place in the church of jesus christ or in a nation that seeks to honor

01:19:49 him on the contrary a christian nation would be an m would be impartial in its judgment number 11

01:19:57 big picture agenda we affirm that the christian nationalist project entails national recognition

01:20:04 of essential christian orthodoxy as a christian consensus under jesus christ the supreme lord and

01:20:11 king of all creation and the establishment of the general equity of the ten commandments as a

01:20:17 foundational law of the nation we affirm the responsibility of civil authorities to protect

01:20:22 the soul not to convert the soul and there is a difference alternative option right so that's

01:20:30 that's one because we're leaving a couple options here you can be a second table guy

01:20:34 only or you can be a all ten commandment guy i'm an all ten commandment guy but we want to have a

01:20:39 big tent alternative option for those who affirm legislating only the second table we affirm that

01:20:45 the christian nationalist project entails a national recognition of essential christian

01:20:50 orthodoxy as a christian consensus under jesus christ the supreme lord and king of all the world

01:20:56 and the establishment of the general equity of the second table of the ten commandments as the

01:21:01 foundational law of the nation with warnings informing of the consequences of blaspheming

01:21:07 the one true and living god warnings of blaspheming the one true and living god often resulting in

01:21:14 second table violations namely the harming of our neighbors lives and property pretty good

01:21:21 we deny that laws against public blasphemy coerce conversion right because the guys who

01:21:27 would sign that first article be being first and second table guys not just second only but first

01:21:32 and second all ten commandments uh we said at the end of that we affirm the responsibility of civil

01:21:36 authorities to protect the soul but not to convert the soul because they can't only the gospel can

01:21:43 do that. So here in the denial, we spell that out just with a little bit more clarification. We

01:21:47 deny that laws against public blasphemy, for instance, coerce conversion or hinder religious

01:21:54 liberty in private. Let me use the Sabbath, Sabbatarian laws for just a moment. The civil

01:22:00 magistrate, I believe, has a right. I believe that the civil magistrate has a right to enforce

01:22:06 Sabbatarian laws. I don't think this is going to happen tomorrow. The church lives in light of

01:22:10 eternity. Therefore, it can afford to be patient. Remember, I'm post-millennial, so I'm down for a

01:22:15 200-year plan. However, I do think that that is perfectly biblical and honors God if you have a

01:22:21 Christian nation and the civil magistrate enforces the Sabbath. But what do we mean by that? The best

01:22:26 way I've heard it expressed is like this. The state does, in fact, have the authority to mandate

01:22:33 a day of rest, but only Christ, who is Lord of the Sabbath, can mandate a day of worship.

01:22:40 the state can mandate a day of rest but only christ who actually can change the heart of man

01:22:49 to be worshipful to actually desire the living god only christ can institute a day of worship

01:22:56 but the state can institute and mandate a day of rest so what are we talking about sabbatarian laws

01:23:03 that uh that you're going to have um civil magistrates state informants in every single

01:23:08 local church uh keeping attendance to see who who went to church that day no no all what we mean by

01:23:16 sabbatarian laws for guys who are first and second table and you don't even have to be first and

01:23:20 second table to sign this statement you could be second table only guy but for those like me who

01:23:24 are first and second table we're saying uh the the state um what do we mean by sabbatarian we

01:23:29 mean uh chick-fil-a that's what we mean closed on sunday chick-fil-a we don't mean that the state

01:23:36 forces church attendance. We don't mean that the state is policing things in people's homes.

01:23:43 We mean that as a society, that there are certain, you would pay certain fines for opening your

01:23:50 business on the Lord's Day. That as a society, we work six days and we rest on the seventh. And

01:23:56 those who are regenerate by the power of the gospel, which alone can change the human heart,

01:23:59 will rest in worship of the triune God. And those who are unregenerate would still have a

01:24:04 a general Christian tradition and culture and would rest from their work, but ultimately would

01:24:11 not be worshiping because they're not saved. They wouldn't be worshiping, at least in the 0.76

01:24:16 truest sense. They may still attend church, which would be wonderful because hopefully they hear

01:24:20 the gospel and they get saved and worship in the truest sense. So that's what we mean with that.

01:24:23 Moving on, number 12, on the vocation and calling of Christian officials and legislators. We affirm

01:24:30 that in God's ordinary providence he works in the world

01:24:33 by his grace through the Holy Spirit through human means

01:24:37 to glorify himself in extending the mediatorial rule of Christ

01:24:42 by calling to and gifting Christians for vocation

01:24:45 to rule according to his word in civil government. 0.72

01:24:48 We affirm that citizens are to submit to our rulers

01:24:52 as unto Christ for his glory and our good.

01:24:56 We affirm the need for more theologically sound Christians

01:24:59 to enter the political realm to proclaim the excellencies of christ and his law while calling

01:25:06 ungodly governments and governing officials to repentance we deny any theology which holds that

01:25:13 christian participation in the civil realm is necessarily unwise unfruitful sinful or anything

01:25:21 other than fitting and then a fitting and necessary vocation and calling for christians in other words

01:25:28 we are saying perhaps not in the exact same way but in a like sense in a like manner

01:25:35 first timothy 3 1 if any man aspires to the office of an elder an officer in the church

01:25:42 he desires a noble task likewise if any man any christian man aspires to the office of a civil

01:25:51 magistrate in the civil realm we believe that that is also a noble desire and that god blesses that

01:25:58 and we deny and repudiate any theology which would hold that christian participation in the

01:26:06 civil realm is unwise or unfruitful or sinful or anything other than fitting which there's a lot

01:26:12 contained in that and it's all spelled out in the statement and what i've read so far and what i'll

01:26:16 read here in a moment but one thing i just want to draw your attention whatever theology you choose

01:26:22 to hold it must be a theology that encompasses a christian who's serving in the civil magistrate

01:26:29 what i mean by that is either your theology says uh that that christians can't be civil magistrates

01:26:39 can't run for city council can't be a governor can't be a police officer can't be in the military

01:26:45 can't this can't that or you say that christians can be in those spaces and that it's noble and

01:26:52 right and pleases the lord it is nothing to be ashamed of that it's not unwise that it's not

01:26:57 unfruitful but here's the kicker if you affirm that a christian can can serve as a civil magistrate

01:27:04 then you must also affirm that a christian can serve as a civil magistrate in a christian manner

01:27:10 you cannot say young man you cannot say as a pastor young man you you can you can hold the

01:27:18 vocation of a civil magistrate but you can't do that and also follow the scripture you need to

01:27:26 be a biblical christian in every realm of your life in your home in your marriage and your

01:27:29 parenting here at church and your recreation but when you go to work you need to take that 0.99

01:27:34 christian hat off do you hear how asinine that is how foolish that is so either your doctrine 0.97

01:27:44 it must be if you're going to be consistent because that's inconsistent so you only have 0.99

01:27:49 two other options because it can't be that one it's either your biblical doctrine is just

01:27:53 straight up pietism and certainly at least pietism may be a bit of a stretch but i'm using it in a

01:27:59 certain sense but certainly pacifism is a proper word your doctrine is is that you're a pacifist

01:28:04 and that Christians cannot serve in the military

01:28:06 and they cannot serve as civil magistrates, 0.68

01:28:07 they can't be a governor,

01:28:08 can't be a city council member,

01:28:09 can't be a police officer,

01:28:10 can't be this, can't be that.

01:28:13 Or, that's your position,

01:28:15 that if you're a Christian, 0.70

01:28:16 you just can't be in the civil realm. 0.93

01:28:20 Or, your position has to be,

01:28:22 you can be a Christian in the civil realm

01:28:23 and not only is it permissible,

01:28:24 but it actually pleases the Lord

01:28:26 and it's honorable.

01:28:27 It's honorable.

01:28:28 And you're going to do so as a Christian,

01:28:31 faithfully.

01:28:31 and you're not going you're not going to operate under the delusion as though neutrality was a

01:28:40 thing you're going to know that every man has an allegiance they're either for christ or against

01:28:45 them there is good and evil in the world and good is defined by the standard of god's word

01:28:51 and you're going to go as a civil magistrate and serve your citizens faithfully with good laws

01:28:59 and and good work defined by god's definition of goodness which is his work that's that's it so

01:29:09 it's either you're allowed to be a christian magistrate but you do so as a christian you're

01:29:14 allowed to be a civil magistrate but you have to be able to be a christian in as a civil magistrate

01:29:19 or you're not allowed to be uh if you're a christian you're not allowed to be a civil

01:29:23 magistrate it's one of those two positions and i think this one's bad the one that says if you're

01:29:27 christian you can't be in the civil realm but it's one of those two those two positions one's

01:29:33 bad one's good but at least they're both consistent what's inconsistent is to say

01:29:37 that christians are called to submit to the lordship of christ in every facet of life

01:29:42 except if they're a civil magistrate when they go to work

01:29:46 that i mean that's that's silly all right number 13 the great commission we affirm that christ

01:29:53 This commissioning of his church to make disciples of all nations,

01:29:56 baptizing them and teaching them to obey all that he has commanded,

01:29:59 includes civil authorities,

01:30:01 who are to be called to repentance, faith, and obedience to Christ.

01:30:05 We affirm that the church is to instruct civil authorities

01:30:08 regarding their identity and duties as rulers before the throne of Christ.

01:30:11 We affirm that this duty is a great commission issue.

01:30:16 We deny that there is any sphere of life

01:30:18 in which the command to teach them to obey all I have commanded

01:30:21 does not apply including politics and government number 14 the uses of the law we affirm that

01:30:29 applying the general equity core moral principle of the 10 commandments to a nation's laws number

01:30:34 one reflects to citizens both the perfect righteousness of god and our own sinfulness

01:30:39 and shortcomings number two secure civil order by restraining evil through protecting the righteous

01:30:44 from the wicked and number three guides christians into good works that god has planned for them

01:30:50 and thus are an essential aspect of keeping the Great Commission

01:30:55 in teaching all nations to obey everything Christ commanded.

01:30:59 Further, we affirm that God issues his law in common grace

01:31:04 based on being the creator of all.

01:31:07 We affirm that God issues his effectual call in the gospel

01:31:11 based on being the savior of many.

01:31:15 We affirm that no man will be saved by works done under the law,

01:31:19 even just laws yet we affirm that the law is a tutor and when laws are just they accurately

01:31:26 reflect the character of god and in this way alone just uh just christian governments serve

01:31:32 the church in its mission of evangelism we affirm that the civil authorities possessing

01:31:37 a moral and spiritual foundation and orienting citizens towards a concept of truth and morality

01:31:44 is an inescapable reality this is number 14 i like this one because this was one of my revisions

01:31:51 so i i did a lot of this writing i think it's fantastic super biased but i think it's good um

01:31:57 we deny now that god we deny that god intended the law um as uh as um summarized and comprehended

01:32:07 in the ten commandments for application solely in the old covenant but rather that it represents

01:32:14 the enduring righteousness of god that is to be loved and obeyed for the good of man and of the

01:32:20 glory of god so the ten commandments are given to all people in all times in all places not just

01:32:26 not just for israel under the old covenant number 15 on the distinction between law and gospel

01:32:33 we affirm that the content of the gospel is the good news of god acting in the person and work

01:32:41 of jesus christ to reconcile sinners and all of fallen creation to himself the essential elements

01:32:46 of the gospel are number one god who created all things is perfectly holy number two all men were

01:32:51 created for god's glory but have sinned and fallen short of his glory and the deserved penalty of our

01:32:57 sin is death and eternal damnation number three the son of god jesus christ while maintaining his

01:33:03 divinity became flesh in the womb of mary lived a sinless life became sin on the cross and as a

01:33:10 substitute died the death that we deserve rose from the dead three days later and ascended to

01:33:16 the right hand of the father and number four by the grace of christ atoning work both his passive

01:33:22 and active obedience on our behalf and through faith in that work the free gift of salvation

01:33:28 is offered to all who would repent of their sin and believe on jesus christ we affirm that salvation

01:33:34 is by grace alone through faith alone in christ alone according to the scripture alone to the

01:33:40 glory of god alone furthermore we affirm that god gave adam a law of universal obedience written on

01:33:48 his heart this same law continued to be a perfect rule of righteousness after the fall and was

01:33:54 delivered by God upon Mount Sinai in Ten Commandments. Obedience to this moral law is

01:34:00 the delight of all who are born again in Christ, those empowered by the Holy Spirit to love and

01:34:06 keep the law. The general equity of this law is the essential moral principle embedded by God in

01:34:13 each command, which all men are bound by God to obey, reflects God's holy character, and applies

01:34:20 in various circumstances in each sphere of life furthermore we affirm that good works done by

01:34:28 christians in obedience to god's commandments are the fruits and evidences of a true and lively

01:34:34 faith and are valuable for assurance of salvation we affirm that to keep the law is to love god

01:34:41 completely and our neighbor as ourselves we affirm that living in a christian nation oriented toward

01:34:48 the true and the eternal provides cultural conditions conducive eat your heart out g3

01:34:55 cultural conditions conducive to the spread of the gospel for salvation the perpetuation

01:35:03 and thriving of the family the perso uh perso preservation and advancement of the christian

01:35:11 church and the abundance of common grace to the unbelieving we deny that the content of the gospel

01:35:19 includes obedience to the law and that any work of obedience merits salvation we deny that law

01:35:27 keeping contributes in any way to justification before god or declaring the sinner righteous

01:35:32 based on anything other than faith on christ in his passive and active obedience we deny that the

01:35:40 law can be separated from the love of the personal god who gave the law we deny that citizenship in

01:35:47 a god-glorifying christian nation or anything outside of the above affirmation has any saving

01:35:54 power there you have law and gospel the same kind of principled thinking that the theologian the

01:36:04 pastor employs in thinking about the inner workings the relationship between the law and the gospel

01:36:10 keeping them distinct but also seeing them work together hand in glove take that same

01:36:15 principled thinking of distinctions with law and gospel and apply it to the church and the state

01:36:21 that's it the law doesn't save obedience to the law doesn't save likewise christian culture

01:36:30 doesn't save it's not salvific but here's the deal it's good it's good and we think that it

01:36:37 aids in salvation. Christian culture doesn't save, but it sure as heck doesn't damn. And as a wise 0.98

01:36:44 man once said, I've said several times before, I'll say it again, Christian culture gooder than 0.97

01:36:49 transing kids. Christian culture gooder than transing kids. That's my theological position. 0.90

01:36:57 Number 16, on civil disobedience. We affirm that categorical opposition to civil disobedience

01:37:03 is idolatry of the state let me say that again on civil disobedience we affirm that categorical

01:37:11 opposition to civil disobedience is idolatry of the state meaning categorical that in every case

01:37:18 you would just say you can't ever exercise opposition to the state we would say that's

01:37:24 idolatry of the state we affirm that civil disobedience is the proper christian response to

01:37:31 to civil dictates which number one command what god forbids number two forbid what forbid what

01:37:39 god commands number three overstep their jurisdiction number four buying the conscience

01:37:45 where god alone has jurisdiction or number five have no basis in rationality meaning a just law

01:37:53 is always a rational law we affirm further that lesser magistrates may and sometimes must disobey

01:38:01 a lawless higher magistrate to obey god a lesser magistrate at times may and must disobey a lawless

01:38:10 higher magistrate in order to be obedient to god if the higher magistrate is being rebellious to

01:38:16 god for example lesser magistrates such as a as state governments counties and municipalities

01:38:23 must disregard any order statute or ruling from a higher magistrate such as the federal government

01:38:30 instructing them to allow abortion that would be an example we deny we deny that men's consciences

01:38:39 homes churches or states are bound by legal or moral inventions of men apart from the word of

01:38:45 god we further deny that civil authorities have the right to coerce or command obedience to the

01:38:52 dictates of men apart from god's word moreover we deny that authority of rulers we deny the

01:38:59 authority of rulers to quelch civil disobedience if the free and necessary worship of the triune

01:39:07 god is at stake stake or being hindered that's number 16 almost done guys we're going to make

01:39:15 number 17 methodology we affirm that the kingdom of god does not advance by carnal means but by the

01:39:22 working of the spirit in bringing men to repentance and faith in jesus christ we affirm that culture

01:39:28 affects law and that law also affects culture we affirm that while political maneuvering and

01:39:35 cultural expertise can be good and helpful god works most powerfully through bold proclamation

01:39:41 of his truth by his people we affirm that god in his ordinary providence makes use of means

01:39:49 yet is free to work without above and against them at his pleasure we deny that pragmatism

01:39:57 should be the driving force behind the decision making of any christian movement it's the word of

01:40:04 god number 18 just war just war we affirm we affirm that war is only to be waged one these

01:40:15 are just basically seven principles of just war theory here we go number one for a just cause

01:40:20 involving the protection of human life from persecution number two as a last resort when

01:40:26 peaceful methods of conflict resolution have been diligently pursued and exhausted old language

01:40:32 would say after full diplomacies number three in pursuit of achievable goals not ideological wars

01:40:40 needs to be achievable winnable number four with a pure motive and intention of establishing

01:40:45 peace and justice as quickly as possible number five by moral means that scrupulously avoid

01:40:52 civilian casualties and only inflicts as much violence as is necessary for the achievement

01:40:59 of the objective we affirm that even when a war is just according to the above criteria

01:41:05 nations should be extremely cautious in discerning whether a proposed war is wise

01:41:11 taking every contingency into account we affirm that many imperial wars have been waged throughout

01:41:17 human history primarily for self-serving purposes such as vainglory or acquiring money land or

01:41:25 natural resources and that those who declare and wage such a war are guilty of the sin of murder

01:41:32 amen we deny that war is ever a means by which the gospel is to be spread we're not arguing for

01:41:41 the spanish inquisition okay there you go we deny that war is ever a means by which the gospel

01:41:48 or simply good ideas about government and society are to be spread we deny that holy wars are ever

01:41:57 morally permissible we deny that governments may coerce civilian participation in unjust wars

01:42:05 number 19 imago de and equal protection we affirm that all civil authorities have a duty before god

01:42:14 to uphold justice by establishing equal protection under the law for all image bearers of God

01:42:20 from the moment of fertilization which is conception. Not implantation, fertilization

01:42:27 which is conception. We affirm that civil authorities must reject all partiality in

01:42:34 judgment by asserting the same legal prohibitions and available sanctions against homicide that

01:42:41 exist to protect persons after birth and persons before birth. Equal penalties means equal

01:42:49 protection. Equal protection means equal value. You cannot say that the unborn child has equal

01:42:57 worth, value, and dignity before God if you will not equally protect them. And you are not equally

01:43:03 protecting them if you will not give equal punishments to those who seek to murder them.

01:43:09 if you are against full penalties for a mother who murders the child in her womb the same penalty

01:43:17 for her as you would give to a homicidal murderer in the first degree who murders their three-year-old

01:43:24 child in the back alley if you are lighter on the mother getting an abortion than you are on the

01:43:29 mother who murders her five-year-old child out of the womb then you are ultimately saying that the

01:43:34 child in the womb is of less value less penalty is less protection you're saying it's open season

01:43:42 it's it's purge season it you the penalty will be liked slap on the wrist you're essentially saying 0.63

01:43:49 it's it's one day a year is purge season for one group of people not white people not black people

01:43:55 not brown people not women people male people rich people poor people unborn people and that's

01:44:02 we've been doing in this nation and after roe we still do it we still do equal penalties that's the

01:44:09 only way that you can actually say we have equal protections and equal protections is the only way

01:44:14 you can actually say that we believe as christians in equal value that the child in the womb is of

01:44:21 equal value we deny that any law which classifies abortion as a lesser crime than homicide or which

01:44:28 allows any class of humans to murder pre-born children with legal immunity is a just law we

01:44:35 deny any law that allows for those things we deny that it would be a just law it is not number 20

01:44:43 oh this is the last one uh because we we worked it in earlier the the 21st affirmation denial so

01:44:50 last one number 20 on neutrality and this is quotation marks rightfully so because it's a

01:44:55 on neutrality and the separation of church and state we affirm that the church and the state

01:45:02 each possess their own sovereign sphere of influence for example church officials ought

01:45:08 not to write or enforce civil laws in their capacity as church officials officials and

01:45:14 civil officials ought not to administer ordinances or dictate doctrine in their capacity as civil

01:45:20 officials but both spheres are under the absolute authority of christ separation of church and state

01:45:27 no separation of christ and state we deny that the separation between the church's sphere of

01:45:35 authority and that of the state means that there must be a separation of the christian worldview

01:45:40 and the state on the contrary the state is doing its duty and fulfilling its purpose only in so far

01:45:48 as it upholds its biblical obligations before god we further deny that there can ever be a

01:45:55 separation between religion and state everyone possesses views about ultimate reality purpose

01:46:01 and cause which inform their morality and preferred policies the question is not whether morality or

01:46:09 religion will influence law but whose morality and religion will influence law all laws are moral

01:46:17 it's not whether but which separation of church and state great separation of christ and state

01:46:25 no thank you it's not whether but which there you have it brothers and sisters down at the bottom

01:46:31 again if you're just now tuning in this is uh you can go to the website statement on christian

01:46:38 nationalism.com statement on christian nationalism.com you'll be able to read the

01:46:44 whole statement at the very bottom, you'll find that you can give your, your first name, last name

01:46:49 and email, and you can say, I'm interested in signing the statement, or you can say, I'm

01:46:54 interested in the upcoming summit. We're going to hold an in-person summit in the month of July,

01:46:59 probably a two day summit, uh, where we do final revisions on the statement, because this is

01:47:04 officially a draft. We just wanted to go ahead and get it out there. We wanted to say, this is

01:47:08 our position. We're being misrepresented left and right. And we're trying to clear that up on

01:47:13 twitter and twitter of course we all knew this but lo and behold it has been confirmed over this

01:47:19 last month that twitter is not a great uh context for clarification and and definitions and uh deep

01:47:25 theological work so we've been misrepresented by guys who are not heretics they're not false

01:47:31 teachers they're brothers but they are misrepresenting us g3 has misrepresented um many

01:47:36 christian nationalists but part of the problem is because many christian nationalists have

01:47:40 differing opinions so me and the christian nationalists that i align with because there

01:47:44 are guys who would wear the banner that i would say no i'm i disagree with your position but i'm

01:47:50 not going to throw the label away it's still the right label i believe it's still the right label

01:47:55 so i am a christian nationalist but i'm a particular kind of christian nationalist

01:48:00 and so me and the other guys that agree with me ironically baptist baptist right you presbyterians

01:48:07 i love you you guys are my brothers you've been saying baptist you need to do the work

01:48:11 this is us doing the work so we're doing the work um trying to come up with with a theologically

01:48:18 robust biblical sound position that addresses civil political theology and so we came up and

01:48:25 said we're not going to just say christian nationalism is a bad label we're not going to wear

01:48:28 no we're gonna we're gonna say no it's a good term and we're going to keep the term and also

01:48:34 we know that not everybody who wears the Christian nationalist hat agrees. And some guys have a

01:48:42 different view, but it's not heretical. And then some guys have a different view and it is heretical

01:48:46 and it's really bad. And we don't want to be associated with them. We keep getting lumped in

01:48:52 and misrepresented by brothers in Christ that we love. You told us to define our terms. So here you

01:49:00 go. You're welcome. We've defined our terms. So if you want to know what me, what William Wolfe,

01:49:06 what Dusty Deavers, what all these guys, let me read the authors for you one more time. It's at

01:49:11 the beginning of the document. I was a lead editor, but the original authors, there's two guys that

01:49:18 co-wrote it. James Silberman and Dusty Deavers were the authors. And then contributing editors

01:49:24 was William Wolfe, Joel Webin, Jeff Wright, Corey Anderson, and Ben Woodring. So we were the team.

01:49:31 I think Ben is Presbyterian, actually. So I take it back. Mostly Baptists. We let one Presbyterian

01:49:36 in because he's a friend. But all that being said, Baptists are trying to do the work. We did the 0.97

01:49:40 work. And if you, when I say this is my position, I can't speak for every Christian nationalist,

01:49:45 but I'm not going to throw away the label because I think it's worth fighting for. I think it's a

01:49:48 good term. I think it's a good term. And so like other guys who were saying, yeah, we think it's

01:49:53 a good term. I'm fighting for the term. I'm going to wear the label, but I'm also going to define

01:49:58 my terms. I get to define what kind of Christian, I don't get to define Christian nationalism for

01:50:02 everybody, but I get to define it for me. And so we're saying this is what we, James Silberman,

01:50:09 Dusty Devers, William Wolfe, Joel Webin, Jeff Wright, Corey Anderson, Ben Woodring, this is

01:50:14 what we mean when we say we are Christian nationalists. And so from now on, if G3 or

01:50:19 anybody else wants to say christian nationalism is really really bad um they're going to have to

01:50:24 they're going to need to specify and say um these christian nationalists that are blatantly racist

01:50:30 or these christian nationalists that are fill in the blank whatever um but they they can't do any

01:50:37 more posts and tag us by name and say this is bad um without dealing with the arguments you've got

01:50:44 to show me from our arguments now from our definitions from our theological arguments

01:50:48 from the scripture why our position is not biblical or why it is biblical but a baptist

01:50:56 can't hold it and i think that's going to be a tough task i think that's going to be a pretty

01:51:01 tough task so uh if you're interested again go to christian uh statement statement on christian

01:51:08 nationalism.com statement on christian nationalism.com nathan also is putting it right now in

01:51:16 the chat and also put it in the comment section once the video is done being live for anybody who

01:51:24 watches after the fact statement on christian nationalism.com and again you can scroll all the

01:51:31 way to the bottom after having read it and give us your name last name email and then you can say

01:51:36 i'm interested in signing the statement or i'm interested in the upcoming summit this is a draft

01:51:41 the upcoming summit summit in july will be a conference and final revisions and then you can

01:51:48 also push for a press inquiry so that's that i hope that this helps to dispel some of the confusion

01:51:58 i have no doubt we'll continue to have some arguments with our brothers but i'd love to

01:52:04 have actual arguments and so i'm hoping that this will at least get us to the the step of having

01:52:09 actual theological arguments and not just uh misrepresenting each other mischaracterizing each 0.61

01:52:14 other talking past each other and again i think some of that is g3's fault i really do i think

01:52:19 that they in some capacity have chosen um to to talk past us on the other hand i think some of it

01:52:27 also on the christian nationalist side my side of the io is the fact that there's a whole wide

01:52:32 spectrum of people claiming to be Christian nationalists. And so it has been a little bit

01:52:36 confusing. And so this is our attempt, not just to win or beat G3, but our attempt to do what G3

01:52:45 has asked us to do and be clear about our position. So now hopefully we can actually

01:52:50 engage the arguments and hopefully get some unity. Winning would be unity. Winning would

01:52:58 actually be agreeing i don't want to win by beating g3 i want to win over g3 that's what i want i

01:53:07 want scott annual god bless him he's a brother i want scott annual to say you know what i read

01:53:12 this statement and after further reflection i think that baptist theology is compatible with

01:53:18 christendom and christian culture gooder than trans and kids that's what i want to see so

01:53:24 thanks for tuning in hope this has been helpful this friday saturday and sunday it's it was months

01:53:31 away forever we've been talking about this for a year it's finally here i feel like like it's

01:53:35 christmas day um the theonomy and postmillennialism conference this weekend may 5th 6th and 7th uh

01:53:43 we've got dr james white we've got dr joe boot we've got uh dale partridge and myself 550 people

01:53:48 uh 200 people on a waiting list god bless their hearts we don't have room we can't fit them in

01:53:52 the venue uh but we are recording everything and uh we're gonna we're gonna be having panels with

01:53:57 me and james white and joe boot and dale partridge we're gonna be taking questions from the audience

01:54:01 and you know some of those questions are gonna be about the controversy with christian nationalism

01:54:05 um and and we'll do our best to address some of those things and me and james white are are

01:54:10 you know i'm more on the christian nationalist side he's right kind of probably smack dab in

01:54:14 the middle i think is is fair i think he's directly in the middle and so i you know i'm

01:54:19 not as hard as maybe some christian nationalist guys and and uh james white certainly is not

01:54:24 taking the exact same stance as the g3 guys although he loves him and and he's uh those

01:54:28 are his brothers you know they're my brothers too but they're his friends he has some close 1.00

01:54:32 relationship with them and so you know i i think they'll there won't be a huge difference uh space

01:54:38 between me and dr white but i think there'll be some and and i'm sure in the panel you guys will

01:54:42 ask questions if you're not interested we won't talk about it but i got a feeling you'll be

01:54:46 interested and so that'll probably come up so you're going to have panel discussions with with

01:54:50 me and dr white you know talking about these things it's it's hot right now and we do need

01:54:55 to figure it out we need to do it charitably we need to seek unity uh we need to not denounce

01:55:00 people as heretics g3 they are not heretics they are brothers um i think they're just wrong i just

01:55:06 think they're wrong on this issue and um and so we've got a conference we come out with a statement

01:55:11 on Christian nationalism and the gospel on Monday. And then this weekend is the Theonomy

01:55:17 and Postmill Conference with live panels with me and James White and Joe Boot and Dale Partridge

01:55:22 and this topic almost inevitably coming up. And I think it'll be, I think it'll be talked about

01:55:28 well. I do not plan. Trust me, I'm not suicidal, right? I don't think that day in my life I've

01:55:34 ever woken up and thought, I'd like to get in a debate with James White today. I've never lived

01:55:40 that that morning i've never had that morning where i wake out uh wake up and get out of bed

01:55:43 and i think today you know what i'd really love you know a cold glass of lemonade sounds delightful

01:55:49 and a public debate with dr james white so that's not that's not where i'm at and i know i james

01:55:56 white is a godly uh man i think that he's going to be level-headed in in this and um and i know

01:56:01 that he's kind of taken the middle path and so i think that we'll actually won't be debating each

01:56:05 other i think we'll actually be able to have some really helpful uh conversations and it's just

01:56:09 I could, I'll just say this. I could not have planned this. I feel like I fell into chocolate

01:56:14 pie. Um, and whether or not that's good or bad is still, you know, it's still, uh, the verdict's

01:56:20 still out, you know, but I feel like providentially this, everything with G3, I didn't start it. 0.98

01:56:25 Scott started with the infamous tweet, you know, Baptists are not compatible with Christendom. 0.93

01:56:29 I'm like, well, I'm a local Baptist pastor who's been discipling my church, that Christendom is

01:56:35 one of the things that we're working towards and you just publicly as a as a lead baptist guy just 0.98

01:56:41 said that that not just that i disagree with your position but um you can't do it baptist can't do

01:56:47 this that's what started it saying baptist can't do this it'd be one thing you know if a baptist

01:56:52 says um i think continuationist baptist are wrong okay um yeah and that's fine i think baptist

01:57:02 continuationists are wrong i'm a cessationist um but when you say uh you need to quit being a baptist

01:57:09 because you're not one not really you you have to be a presbyterian um if you're working for

01:57:15 christian culture and see that as a positive good see that as something that um that that

01:57:21 does not actually hinder gospel preaching and conversion um then you can't be a baptist that's

01:57:29 how it started and and the memes started flying and some of them are hardcore you know so i'm not

01:57:35 saying it's all been good like the christian nationalists have just done everything perfectly

01:57:38 but i'm just saying remember how it started it's it started when a baptist brother who is a brother

01:57:43 and a good brother um didn't just say i think this position is wrong he said if you're a baptist like

01:57:49 me you can't do this and i'm a baptist minister who's been telling my local congregation and my

01:57:54 podcast with right response ministries publicly uh that we can do it and should be doing it so

01:58:00 yeah i have to publicly address that that's an elephant in the room that you can't just

01:58:04 pretend it's not there so then i engaged so i didn't plan this but i engaged i didn't i didn't

01:58:10 plan it i didn't start it but i engaged and then engaging i got invited to be a part of this

01:58:18 statement and then the timing with the statement drops the week before my conference and now we

01:58:22 have this conference happening with all and it's providential i think it's awesome i think dr james

01:58:30 white probably i think he thinks the timing's horrible i think he's like this is crazy i can't

01:58:33 believe and i'm like this is kind of awesome i feel like yeah it's uncomfortable and it's weird

01:58:37 but i but we're christians and we're grown men and we can do it and i think it's going to bless

01:58:40 the church and bring a lot of clarity so please be praying this weekend um please please be praying

01:58:45 for those who are attending the conference for me and and dr james white and dr joe boot and

01:58:50 Dale Partridge who are speaking at the conference. And, uh, and we're going to get the content from

01:58:54 the conference for all those of you who weren't able to, to attend because we sold out six months

01:58:58 in advance. Uh, we're going to record everything and get it out as soon as possible. We would

01:59:02 live stream. Many of you have asked, we would live stream if, um, the venue had good internet.

01:59:08 It doesn't. And we've tried hotspot and we've tried whatever Elon Musk thing is. What's that

01:59:14 called nathan start oh we did we did not try starlink because um because we didn't have a

01:59:20 million dollars um and so uh but but we tried every everything that we could to do the live

01:59:25 stream we can't um and so what we're going to do is record it in really high quality instead of

01:59:30 doing a failed live stream we're going to have a really high quality and just get it out as soon

01:59:35 as possible so hopefully as soon as uh next week you'll be able to see the uh at least if not the

01:59:40 main sessions, at least see the panels, which I know most of you, uh, that that's probably your,

01:59:44 your highest interest is seeing the panels, uh, with, with, with me and James and Joe and Dale.

01:59:48 And so, um, hopefully, um, we'll have the panels next, next week, early next week for you guys to

01:59:54 watch on YouTube and on our podcast platform, Spotify and iTunes and, uh, the, the right

01:59:59 response website and our app and the whole nine yards. And, um, just be praying for us, pray for

02:00:04 us pray that um that we would honor christ um and pray that god would unite his church how good it

02:00:12 is when when brothers dwell with one another in unity um we want that and i'm a sinner i want that

02:00:20 and you know what i don't always act that way i do stupid things because i'm a sinner so i don't

02:00:26 always act in a unifying uh manner but pray that i would pray that i would and um and pray that

02:00:35 this statement helps to bring clarity and it's not just a one upping and and the optic isn't

02:00:41 just viewed as a one upping or a beating but it's viewed as a as as we're trying to be clear because

02:00:46 that's what you guys are asking for and we know that clarity is needed because there's a million

02:00:50 different definitions for what christian nationalism is and so pray that this brings

02:00:53 clarity and that with that clarity uh doesn't come further enmity um but further unity that's

02:01:01 my prayer let that be your prayer and um and be praying uh that that happens with the statement

02:01:06 and that all also happens through our conference and uh next week you'll see the content for those

02:01:11 of you who are not able to attend in person and you also at this conference we are going to unveil

02:01:16 our next two conferences and the topics that those conferences are on

02:01:20 and the speakers and it's awesome it's awesome it's i it's just as good if not better than than

02:01:29 the theonomy and postmail conference um not just the next conference but two upcoming conferences

02:01:34 so you'll have a chance to register if you miss this one you'll have a chance to register for the

02:01:38 next we're going to publicly announce it this friday live in person at our conference and we

02:01:43 will publicly on the internet announce it and open it up for registration uh either uh sunday night

02:01:50 or probably monday morning uh may 8th a week from today so a lot of exciting things our documentary

02:01:56 we're filming this week nathan anderson that the director of um on earth as it is in heaven he gets

02:02:01 in tomorrow from chile his his plane lands and his assistant from germany gets in on wednesday

02:02:05 and we're going to be filming uh the next couple days and filming during the conference and they're

02:02:09 staying for a total of 12 days four days after so and i've got a book coming out uh fight by flight

02:02:14 Doug Wilson wrote The Ford, and Meg Basham, and Steve Dace, and Michael Foster, and Dale

02:02:19 Partridge, and Joe Boot, and Samuel Say, and maybe I'm forgetting some other guys endorsed it.

02:02:26 And so this week, my book comes out by God's grace. And so it's just, God is just, I don't

02:02:34 know. He's just put it all together. And it's not me. I have nothing to boast in. It's just the

02:02:39 grace of God. But you got the statement on Christian nationalism in the gospel. You've got

02:02:43 fight by flight. Why leaving godless places is loving godless places. My book coming out this

02:02:50 weekend, theonomy and post-mail conference coming out this weekend and announcing the next two

02:02:54 conferences this weekend, filming the documentary over the next 10 days. Awesome stuff in store for

02:03:00 you guys. So, so those of you who are supporting this ministry, praying for this ministry, watching

02:03:04 and participating, encouraging, emailing. I know it's been a heck of a ride the last month with

02:03:10 all the debates about christian nationalism but stay with us um i believe that by god's grace

02:03:15 nothing nothing with joel webin but by god's grace that we're doing um we're doing good work

02:03:21 we're doing um good faithful ministry and uh and we need you to come along for the ride and and to

02:03:28 stand with us and uh to support us uh through prayers and encouragement and financial support

02:03:34 if you're able to. And we've got a lot of great stuff coming out all at once over the next few

02:03:41 weeks for you, for your edification, for your blessing and for the glory of God. So thank you

02:03:46 and keep us in your prayers. Exciting stuff, but I am going to be more busy than I've ever been in

02:03:51 my life. So I need your prayers for strength. All right. Thanks for tuning in and we will see you

02:03:56 tomorrow. We've got another episode of Theology Applied, 2 p.m. Central Time,

02:04:01 our flagship show, Theology Applied. That's tomorrow at 2 p.m. Central Time. Bye.

02:04:17 Can I be frank with you for just a second right here at the end? Look, some of you guys,

02:04:22 you're financially supporting this ministry, and from the bottom of my heart, I say thank you. I

02:04:28 cannot thank you enough. However, some of you, you just, you can't afford it. In fact, some of you,

02:04:35 you shouldn't afford it. Let's be honest. I mean, we're living in Joe Biden's ridiculous economy.

02:04:42 Our nation and our totalitarian political elites lost their minds over the last three years 0.91

02:04:50 due to COVID. We have written checks that we simply cannot cash. It doesn't matter if people

02:04:57 change the definition of a recession. We are living in a recession right now regardless.

02:05:04 Some of you are struggling to afford a carton of eggs at the grocery store. You cannot support

02:05:10 financially this ministry at this time, nor should you, but you could still help us tremendously.

02:05:17 I am asking you, please, if you're willing to do so, take one minute of your time. Leave us a

02:05:24 five-star review on your favorite podcast platform, iTunes, Spotify, whatever that might be.

02:05:31 This is the way the system works. We want to be innocent as doves, but shrewd as vipers.

02:05:36 We need to be strategic. You leave us a five-star review, and our podcast shows up for more people.

02:05:44 And the Word of God and courageous theology applied in practical ways to every realm of life

02:05:51 gets out there. Help us get it out there. Thanks for tuning in.

`witch hunt`	Both words, anywhere in the episode.
`"witch hunt"`	The exact phrase.
`witch OR hunt`	Either word.
`"alpha male" -"high value"`	The first phrase, but not the second.
`(feminist OR feminism) AND (marriage OR divorce)`	Parentheses group alternatives.
`"decline civilization"~5`	Both words within 5 words of each other.

`misogyn*`	Any word starting with "misogyn": misogyny, misogynist, misogynistic…
`feminizm~1`	Words one letter off: catches typos and transcription errors.

`person:"Andrew Tate"`	Episodes where they host, guest, or are mentioned.
`host:"Glenn Beck"`	Episodes they host.
`guest:"Jordan Peterson"`	Episodes they appear on as a guest.
`mentioned:"Andrew Tate" -host:"Andrew Tate"`	Talked about on other people's shows.
`show:"Bannon's War Room"`	Episodes from one show.

`topics:abortion`	Episodes tagged with a topic (see the Topics page).
`summary:"Andrew Tate"`	Words in the episode summary. Summaries are machine-written and can be wrong.

`"great replacement" AND episode_date:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW]`	From the past 12 months.
`lockdown AND episode_date:[2020-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2020-12-31T23:59:59Z]`	From one year. Dates need the full time, as shown.
`"high value" AND misogyny_count:[100 TO *]`	Episodes with 100 or more sentences flagged as misogynistic. Also: hate_speech_count, toxicity_count, word_count.

The NXR Podcast - May 06, 2023

BONUS EPISODE - #FontGate #G3 ｜ The Statement On Christian Nationalism And The Gospel

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript